Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

Dit is een professionele workstation videokaart (voor CAD en andere 3D programma's geoptimalizeerd) met DirectX 10 en goede OpenGL ondersteuning - waarschijnlijk gebaseerd op de GeForce 8700M GT videokaart. Hij is gemaakt voor digitale content makers, architecten, ingenieurs en andere professionele 3D gebruikers. Gecertificeerde drivers staan in voor betere en snellere weergava van professionele programma's (CAD, CCD, visualizatie software).

Quadro FX Serie

Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 bit @ 350 MHz
CodenaamNB8P-GLM
ArchitectuurG8x
Pipelines32 - verenigd
Core-snelheid625 MHz
Shader-snelheid1250 MHz
Geheugensnelheid800 MHz
Geheugenbusbreedte128 bit
GeheugentypeGDDR3
Max. hoeveelheid geheugen512 MB
Gedeeld geheugennee
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Stroomverbruik50 Watt
Aantal Transistoren289 miljoen
technologie80 nm
Faciliteiten PureVideo, Video van grote wijzigen, LCD's met 1920x1200 pixels, PCI-Express, connector voor een externe videokaart
Laptop Groottegroot
Aangekondigde datum01.06.2007
Informatie CG shading, 32 bits floating point precisie, 12 bits subpixel precisie, 128 bits preciesie van de grafishe pipelines, vertex- en pixelshaders programeerbaar, PCI-E uitvoering, FSAA met roterend grid, nView multidispay ondersteuning, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technologie, 3D Hardware clipping, volledige anti-aliasing.
Link naar fabrikantwww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 27822     gem: 32843     mediaan: 35198 (37%)     max: 35509 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 15060     gem: 16009     mediaan: 15915 (8%)     max: 17144 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9344     gem: 9963     mediaan: 9873 (11%)     max: 10375 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings +
3DMark 06
min: 4535     gem: 4623     mediaan: 4622.5 (6%)     max: 4710 punten
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 4798     gem: 4916     mediaan: 4915.5 (6%)     max: 5033 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 +
3DMark 06
5608 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3899     gem: 4670     mediaan: 4885 (3%)     max: 5226 punten
- Benchmarkresultaten voor deze videokaart
- Gemiddelde benchmarkresultaten voor deze videokaart
* Kleinere getallen betekenen een hogere prestatie

Game Benchmarks

De volgende benchmarks zijn afgeleid van onze laptop-testrapporten. De prestaties variëren afhankelijk van het gebruikte grafische geheugen, kloksnelheid, processor, systeeminstellingen, drivers en besturingssysteem. De resultaten zijn daarom niet noodzakelijk representatief voor alle laptops met deze GPU. Voor meer gedetailleerde informatie over de benchmarkresultaten, klik op het fps-aantal.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
lage 1024x768
83.2 84.2 ~ 84 fps    + Vergelijk
gem. 1024x768
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps    + Vergelijk
hoge 1024x768
13.6 14.4 15.9 ~ 15 fps    + Vergelijk
» Met alle geteste laptops speelbaar met lage instellingen.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
67.2
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
25.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
57.2
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
21.9
16.4
High 1280x800
12.3
9.9
High 800x600
19.4
Medium 1680x1050
13.6
Low 1920x1200
23.5
Low 1920x1200
35.8
Medium 1920x1200
13.4
High 1920x1200
5.3
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
lage 1024x768
12.7 72.2 73.1 ~ 53 fps    + Vergelijk
gem. 1024x768
23.5 29.6 ~ 27 fps    + Vergelijk
hoge 1024x768
13.2 15.6 ~ 14 fps    + Vergelijk
» Met de meeste geteste laptops speelbaar met lage instellingen.
Additional Benchmarks
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
59.9
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
22.6
Low 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
50.6
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
19.4
15.7
High 1440x900
9.4
Medium 1680x1050
12.6
High 1920x1200
5.1
Medium 1920x1200
9.8
Low 1920x1200
31.6
19.1
High 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
11.9
High 0xAF 0xAA 800x600
18.5
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
gem. 1024x768
36 37 ~ 37 fps    + Vergelijk
hoge 1024x768
21 23 ~ 22 fps    + Vergelijk
» Met alle geteste laptops speelbaar met gem. instellingen.
Additional Benchmarks
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1280x800
33
31
High 2xAF 2xAA 1280x800
20
18
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1440x900
29
27
High 2xAF 2xAA 1440x900
18
14
Medium 0xAF 0xAA 1680x1050
24
High 2xAF 2xAA 1680x1050
12
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
lage 640x480
444 476 493 ~ 471 fps    + Vergelijk
gem. 800x600
153 162 167 ~ 161 fps    + Vergelijk
hoge 1024x768
56 56 59 ~ 57 fps    + Vergelijk
» Met alle geteste laptops speelbaar met hoge instellingen.
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
lage 640x480
160.8 173.6 ~ 167 fps    + Vergelijk
gem. 640x480
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps    + Vergelijk
hoge 800x600
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps    + Vergelijk
ultra 1024x768
129.1 129.2 ~ 129 fps    + Vergelijk
» Met alle geteste laptops speelbaar met ultra instellingen.
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
lagegem.hogeultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark843215
Crysis - CPU Benchmark532714
World in Conflict - Benchmark3722
F.E.A.R.47116157
Doom 3167169163129
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo549
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1
2
1
2

2
3
1

2



1






Voor meer games die mogelijk speelbaar zijn of voor een lijst van alle games en videokaarten, bezoek onze Gaming List

v1.26
log 15. 13:35:47

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Mar 2024 05:40:26 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.033s ... 0.033s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.034s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.035s

#12 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#15 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.036s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.037s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.037s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.037s

#22 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.037s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 183 +0.012s ... 0.05s

#24 got single benchmarks 183 +0.011s ... 0.061s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#26 min, max, avg, median took s +0.199s ... 0.259s

#27 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.259s

#28 Got 36 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.264s

#29 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.264s

#30 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.266s

#31 benchmarks composed for output. +0.133s ... 0.399s

#32 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 0.402s

#33 return log +0s ... 0.402s

Please share our article, every link counts!

Klasse 0

Arc A380

Klasse 1

GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU

Klasse 2

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Klasse 3

Vega M GH
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Quadro P1000
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M620 *
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Quadro M520
Vega 8
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics G7 (Lakefield GT2 64 EU)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
UHD Graphics G4 (Lakefield GT1 48 EU) *

Klasse 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600

Klasse 5

* Benaderende positie van de videokaart

> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > FAQ / Techniek > Vergelijking van Video Kaarten > NVIDIA > NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Klaus Hinum, 2008-04-29 (Update: 2012-05-18)