Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Smartphone

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Sven Kloevekorn (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 06-03-2018

8 volgt op 5. De Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) volgt de Galaxy A5 (2017) op als het nieuwste toestel van de populaire Galaxy A-serie. Het prijskaartje van 499 euro zou wel eens onpopulair kunnen blijken. We achterhalen in onze tests of Samsung deze ambitieuze prijs kan rechtvaardigen.

Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Galaxy Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7885, Exynos 7885 Octa
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.6 inch 18:9, 2220 x 1080 pixel 441 PPI, Super AMOLED, Infinity Display, Full-HD+, glimmend: ja
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23.3 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm-audio-klink, Card Reader: MicroSD-kaarten tot 256 GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, gyroscoop, afstandssensor, barometer, geomagnetische sensor, lichtsensor, vingerafdruklezer, Hall-sensor, Wi-Fi Direct, ANT+, App2SD
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat.11 (700, 800, 850, 900, 1.800, 1.900, 2.100, 2.300, 2.500, 2.600 MHz), Downloads tot 600 MBit/s, Uploads tot 50 MBit/s, 2x Nano-SIM, Head-SAR 0,241 W/kg, Body-SAR 1,25 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.4 x 149.2 x 70.6
Batterij
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Gesprekstijd 2G (volgens fabrikant): 24 h, Gesprekstijd 3G (volgens fabrikant): 24 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix 16 MP, f 1.7, pixelgrootte 1.12 µm, sensorgrootte 1/2.8", FOV 78°, PDAV, video's tot 1080p @ 30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Dual-frontcamera: 16 MP (f 1.9, pixelgrootte 1.12 µm, sensorgrootte 1/4.0", FOV 85°) + 8 MP (f 1.9, pixelgrootte 1.0 µm, Sensor size 1/3.1”, FOV 76°) video's tot 1080p @ 30 FPS
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Mono-luidspreker, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Modulaire voeding, USB Type-C-naar-Type-A-kabel, koptelefoon, SIM-tool, korthandleiding, 24 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
172 g, Voeding: 25 g
Prijs
499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)

Formaat Vergelijking

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
489 MBit/s ∼100% +75%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼79% +38%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼68% +19%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
283 MBit/s ∼58% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼57%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
242 MBit/s ∼49% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=303)
210 MBit/s ∼43% -25%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼100% +142%
Sony Xperia XZ1
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
500 MBit/s ∼77% +86%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
329 MBit/s ∼51% +22%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=303)
205 MBit/s ∼32% -24%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
148 MBit/s ∼23% -45%
Honor 9
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
140 MBit/s ∼22% -48%
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) - Totale afstand
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) - Totale afstand
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) - Brug
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) - Brug
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) - Omkeerpunt
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) - Omkeerpunt
Garmin Edge 500 - Totale afstand
Garmin Edge 500 - Totale afstand
Garmin Edge 500 - Brug
Garmin Edge 500 - Brug
Garmin Edge 500 - Omkeerpunt
Garmin Edge 500 - Omkeerpunt

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
540
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
534
cd/m²
541
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
549
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 549 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 538.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.77 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 96 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 541 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris X Pro
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Honor 9
IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.15
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Sony Xperia XZ1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-10%
-69%
1%
5%
2%
Brightness middle
541
656
21%
458
-15%
550
2%
425
-21%
620
15%
Brightness
538
634
18%
473
-12%
535
-1%
423
-21%
610
13%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
88
-8%
92
-4%
92
-4%
93
-3%
Black Level *
0.4
0.51
0.42
0.79
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.8
5.3
9%
7.1
-22%
3.3
43%
2.1
64%
4.2
28%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.7
5.2
-93%
10.5
-289%
3.6
-33%
2.5
7%
3.9
-44%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
2.38 92%
2.32 95%
2.02 109%
CCT
6570 99%
7905 82%
8951 73%
7226 90%
6455 101%
7086 92%
Contrast
1640
898
1310
785
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.8
14.5
4.5
3.4
5.8

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 242.7 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 242.7 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 242.7 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8943 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
5.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2.4 ms stijging
↘ 2.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points ∼33%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
68282 Points ∼27% -18%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
66226 Points ∼26% -20%
Honor 9
150276 Points ∼59% +80%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼68% +107%
Sony Xperia XZ1
167748 Points ∼66% +101%
Oukitel K10
54763 Points ∼22% -34%
Ulefone Power 3
54201 Points ∼21% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (83284 - 87728, n=2)
85506 Points ∼34% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=387)
75990 Points ∼30% -9%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points ∼51%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5085 Points ∼49% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4915 Points ∼48% -6%
Honor 9
6113 Points ∼59% +17%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼64% +26%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6443 Points ∼62% +24%
Oukitel K10
4706 Points ∼46% -10%
Ulefone Power 3
4770 Points ∼46% -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (5214 - 5387, n=2)
5301 Points ∼51% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=255)
4555 Points ∼44% -13%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points ∼44%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
6264 Points ∼46% +6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
5886 Points ∼44% -1%
Honor 9
7034 Points ∼52% +19%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼57% +31%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7056 Points ∼52% +19%
Oukitel K10
6135 Points ∼45% +4%
Ulefone Power 3
6344 Points ∼47% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (5625 - 5916, n=2)
5771 Points ∼43% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (6412 - 13531, n=423)
4958 Points ∼37% -16%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points ∼59%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
766 Points ∼38% -36%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
806 Points ∼40% -33%
Honor 9
1069 Points ∼53% -11%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼65% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1181 Points ∼58% -1%
Oukitel K10
700 Points ∼34% -41%
Ulefone Power 3
829 Points ∼41% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1090 - 1195, n=2)
1143 Points ∼56% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=499)
698 Points ∼34% -42%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points ∼5%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1496 Points ∼5% +12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1012 Points ∼4% -24%
Honor 9
4126 Points ∼14% +210%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼21% +358%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5923 Points ∼21% +345%
Oukitel K10
855 Points ∼3% -36%
Ulefone Power 3
855 Points ∼3% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1331 - 1356, n=2)
1344 Points ∼5% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=499)
1737 Points ∼6% +31%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points ∼36%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1380 Points ∼22% -39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1046 Points ∼17% -54%
Honor 9
3258 Points ∼52% +43%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼61% +69%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1752 Points ∼28% -23%
Oukitel K10
1609 Points ∼26% -29%
Ulefone Power 3
1566 Points ∼25% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (2275 - 2445, n=2)
2360 Points ∼38% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=499)
1244 Points ∼20% -45%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points ∼26%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3319 Points ∼20% -24%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3492 Points ∼21% -20%
Honor 9
4154 Points ∼25% -5%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼36% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ1
5840 Points ∼35% +34%
Oukitel K10
2913 Points ∼18% -33%
Ulefone Power 3
2906 Points ∼18% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4358 - 4506, n=2)
4432 Points ∼27% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=499)
2512 Points ∼15% -42%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points ∼24%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1513 Points ∼18% -24%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
1314 Points ∼16% -34%
Honor 9
2779 Points ∼33% +39%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼44% +85%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2909 Points ∼34% +46%
Oukitel K10
1294 Points ∼15% -35%
Ulefone Power 3
1340 Points ∼16% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1993 - 2009, n=2)
2001 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=503)
1255 Points ∼15% -37%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points ∼8%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3942 Points ∼9% +7%
Honor 9
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼18% +117%
Sony Xperia XZ1
7979 Points ∼18% +117%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (3680 - 4026, n=2)
3853 Points ∼9% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=197)
4524 Points ∼10% +23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points ∼12%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
4172 Points ∼12% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
4369 Points ∼12% -1%
Honor 9
6527 Points ∼18% +47%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼18% +51%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6493 Points ∼18% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4429 - 4431, n=2)
4430 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=247)
4308 Points ∼12% -3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points ∼24%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
865 Points ∼14% -43%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
928 Points ∼15% -39%
Honor 9
1869 Points ∼29% +22%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼31% +29%
Sony Xperia XZ1
1856 Points ∼29% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1525 - 1526, n=2)
1526 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=248)
1270 Points ∼20% -17%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points ∼46%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1751 Points ∼42% -10%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2132 Points ∼51% +9%
Honor 9
2287 Points ∼54% +17%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼73% +57%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2928 Points ∼69% +50%
Oukitel K10
1257 Points ∼30% -36%
Ulefone Power 3
1240 Points ∼29% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1821 - 1950, n=2)
1886 Points ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼39% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points ∼11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
726 Points ∼13% +17%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
379 Points ∼7% -39%
Honor 9
2798 Points ∼52% +353%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼75% +550%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3961 Points ∼74% +541%
Oukitel K10
56 Points ∼1% -91%
Ulefone Power 3
54 Points ∼1% -91%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (618 - 634, n=2)
626 Points ∼12% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼22% +92%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points ∼15%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
835 Points ∼18% +15%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
464 Points ∼10% -36%
Honor 9
2666 Points ∼56% +266%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼79% +416%
Sony Xperia XZ1
3673 Points ∼78% +404%
Oukitel K10
71 Points ∼1% -90%
Ulefone Power 3
69 Points ∼1% -91%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (729 - 741, n=2)
735 Points ∼16% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼24% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points ∼46%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1785 Points ∼42% -8%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
2127 Points ∼50% +9%
Honor 9
1809 Points ∼43% -7%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼72% +56%
Sony Xperia XZ1
2564 Points ∼61% +32%
Oukitel K10
1200 Points ∼28% -38%
Ulefone Power 3
1237 Points ∼29% -36%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1829 - 1946, n=2)
1888 Points ∼45% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=384)
1540 Points ∼37% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points ∼11%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1289 Points ∼16% +47%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
725 Points ∼9% -18%
Honor 9
2990 Points ∼36% +240%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼70% +559%
Sony Xperia XZ1
6057 Points ∼73% +589%
Oukitel K10
55 Points ∼1% -94%
Ulefone Power 3
57 Points ∼1% -94%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (845 - 879, n=2)
862 Points ∼10% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=384)
1632 Points ∼20% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points ∼16%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
1374 Points ∼21% +37%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
849 Points ∼13% -15%
Honor 9
2611 Points ∼40% +161%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼75% +381%
Sony Xperia XZ1
4649 Points ∼72% +364%
Oukitel K10
70 Points ∼1% -93%
Ulefone Power 3
72 Points ∼1% -93%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (960 - 1001, n=2)
981 Points ∼15% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=392)
1387 Points ∼21% +39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points ∼17%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
13014 Points ∼16% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
17044 Points ∼22% +28%
Honor 9
15150 Points ∼19% +14%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼27% +60%
Sony Xperia XZ1
23046 Points ∼29% +73%
Oukitel K10
6847 Points ∼9% -49%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (13306 - 13914, n=2)
13610 Points ∼17% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=539)
12880 Points ∼16% -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points ∼3%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
18386 Points ∼3% +20%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13277 Points ∼3% -13%
Honor 9
38979 Points ∼7% +155%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼11% +281%
Sony Xperia XZ1
47857 Points ∼9% +214%
Oukitel K10
9862 Points ∼2% -35%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (15262 - 15567, n=2)
15415 Points ∼3% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=539)
17994 Points ∼3% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points ∼7%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
16841 Points ∼8% +14%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
13963 Points ∼7% -6%
Honor 9
28883 Points ∼14% +95%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼20% +184%
Sony Xperia XZ1
31618 Points ∼15% +114%
Oukitel K10
8983 Points ∼4% -39%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (14779 - 15167, n=2)
14973 Points ∼7% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=540)
15114 Points ∼7% +2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
30 fps ∼0% -12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
23 fps ∼0% -32%
Honor 9
60 fps ∼0% +76%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼1% +232%
Sony Xperia XZ1
111 fps ∼1% +226%
Oukitel K10
22 fps ∼0% -35%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
34 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=564)
31.4 fps ∼0% -8%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps ∼1%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
29 fps ∼1% -6%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
22 fps ∼1% -29%
Honor 9
55 fps ∼2% +77%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼2% +94%
Sony Xperia XZ1
60 fps ∼2% +94%
Oukitel K10
21 fps ∼1% -32%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
31 fps ∼1% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=567)
25 fps ∼1% -19%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼0% -12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.8 fps ∼0% -39%
Honor 9
30 fps ∼0% +88%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼1% +275%
Sony Xperia XZ1
56 fps ∼1% +250%
Oukitel K10
10 fps ∼0% -37%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
16 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=486)
16.8 fps ∼0% +5%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
14 fps ∼0% -7%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
9.6 fps ∼0% -36%
Honor 9
28 fps ∼1% +87%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼1% +253%
Sony Xperia XZ1
52 fps ∼1% +247%
Oukitel K10
10 fps ∼0% -33%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
15 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=489)
16 fps ∼0% +7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.7 fps ∼0% -2%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.4 fps ∼0% -35%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼0% +122%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼1% +314%
Sony Xperia XZ1
41 fps ∼1% +314%
Oukitel K10
6.5 fps ∼0% -34%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
9.9 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼0% +44%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.5 fps ∼0% -1%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
6.3 fps ∼0% -34%
Honor 9
22 fps ∼1% +129%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼1% +285%
Sony Xperia XZ1
42 fps ∼1% +338%
Oukitel K10
6.2 fps ∼0% -35%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
9.6 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼0% +45%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼0% -12%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼0% -42%
Honor 9
15 fps ∼0% +150%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼1% +317%
Sony Xperia XZ1
24 fps ∼1% +300%
Oukitel K10
3.7 fps ∼0% -38%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
6 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼0% +64%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps ∼0%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
5.3 fps ∼0% -9%
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3.5 fps ∼0% -40%
Honor 9
16 fps ∼1% +176%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼1% +297%
Sony Xperia XZ1
25 fps ∼1% +331%
Oukitel K10
3.6 fps ∼0% -38%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
5.8 fps ∼0% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼0% +53%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3.052 fps ∼8%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
9.81 fps ∼25% +221%
Oukitel K10
5.25 fps ∼14% +72%
Ulefone Power 3
4.99 fps ∼13% +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
3.05 fps ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)
12.1 fps ∼31% +296%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
355 Points ∼7%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
190 Points ∼4% -46%
Oukitel K10
242 Points ∼5% -32%
Ulefone Power 3
242 Points ∼5% -32%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
355 Points ∼7% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼13% +95%

Legende

 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Oukitel K10 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Power 3 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
61.335 Points ∼92% +25%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
58.6 Points ∼88% +19%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points ∼74%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (48 - 49.1, n=2)
48.5 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=422)
36.7 Points ∼55% -25%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
28.09 Points ∼42% -43%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
26.837 Points ∼40% -45%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
22.91 Points ∼34% -53%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
19.84 Points ∼30% -60%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼100% +34%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
10208 Points ∼82% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
10096 Points ∼81% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points ∼75%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (9165 - 9350, n=2)
9258 Points ∼74% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=557)
5556 Points ∼44% -41%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
4424 Points ∼35% -53%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
4398 Points ∼35% -53%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
3155 Points ∼25% -66%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
3051 Points ∼24% -67%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
23714.1 ms * ∼100% -455%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
22892.5 ms * ∼97% -435%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=578)
11474 ms * ∼48% -168%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
9425 ms * ∼40% -120%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
8741.5 ms * ∼37% -104%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275.2 ms * ∼18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4123 - 4275, n=2)
4199 ms * ∼18% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
3267.9 ms * ∼14% +24%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
3149 ms * ∼13% +26%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼13% +28%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼100% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61)
170 Points ∼94% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (156 - 168, n=2)
162 Points ∼90% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼61% -29%
Honor 9 (Chrome 59)
107 Points ∼59% -31%
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62)
95 Points ∼52% -39%
BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
86 Points ∼48% -45%
Oukitel K10 (Standard Browser 7.1.1)
46 Points ∼25% -71%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
43 Points ∼24% -72%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy A8 2018Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLBQ Aquaris X ProHonor 9OnePlus 5TSony Xperia XZ1Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
-11%
21%
83%
46%
-16%
-23%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
49.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-20%
34.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-44%
47.71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-23%
47.1 (3.4 - 87.1, n=111)
-24%
45.5 (3.4 - 87.1, n=317)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
77.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.93 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
78.69 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
1%
67.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
65.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
66.3 (8.2 - 96.5, n=111)
-15%
63.7 (8.2 - 96.5, n=317)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
14.69
7.59
-48%
12.07
-18%
32.7
123%
20
36%
14.93
2%
18.9 (0.75 - 77.3, n=151)
29%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=607)
10%
Random Read 4KB
82.62
68.57
-17%
37.97
-54%
55.7
-33%
138.1
67%
156.61
90%
36.3 (3.59 - 117, n=151)
-56%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=607)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
104.2
205.27
97%
139.63
34%
204
96%
203.4
95%
204.43
96%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=151)
-9%
79.9 (2.99 - 246, n=607)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB
299.94
287.38
-4%
270.46
-10%
293
-2%
698.7
133%
679.13
126%
230 (25.8 - 440, n=151)
-23%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=607)
-23%
Dead Trigger 2
 InstellingenWaarde
 high54 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InstellingenWaarde
 high30 fps
 very low30 fps
Max. Belasting
 36.2 °C36.3 °C35.5 °C 
 36.5 °C37.9 °C35.8 °C 
 36.9 °C37.8 °C37.7 °C 
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.7 °C
32.7 °C34.4 °C35.1 °C
33.9 °C38.1 °C36.7 °C
34.4 °C37.4 °C39.2 °C
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  28.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.245.12532.940.33137.238.24031.741.75039.642.76328.327.38027.32910026.92712526.730.31602437.620020.942.825020.951.931519.555.540018.560.750017.564.663017.567.980015.769.5100015.872.3125016.670.1160015.872.2200015.470.8250015.573.131501674.6400015.876.850001670.2630016.373.7800016.376.61000016.273.71250016.465.71600016.454.3SPL28.685N1.162.6median 16.4median 69.5Delta2.110.235.236.232.929.237.228.431.73539.633.428.329.927.329.626.928.926.727.52432.720.94320.947.919.55018.55717.565.517.566.715.772.215.869.616.67015.870.315.469.615.572.91672.515.868.11669.916.371.816.369.416.264.316.461.116.455.528.682.21.152.8median 16.4median 66.72.11035.240.732.946.337.244.431.748.639.648.928.337.627.329.926.933.726.732.92445.520.955.320.956.619.559.118.568.417.564.917.567.415.766.215.87016.672.715.873.815.474.415.575.91679.315.8781671.816.371.516.371.416.272.416.464.716.446.328.686.31.165.5median 16.4median 68.42.18.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A8 2018Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KLOnePlus 5T
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 5T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.15 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.02 / 1.1 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.86 / 5.97 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Power Consumption
-59%
-30%
-72%
-18%
-68%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.84
-25%
0.67
-0%
1.13
-69%
0.58
13%
0.51
24%
Idle Average *
1.02
2.31
-126%
1.7
-67%
2.25
-121%
1.44
-41%
2.16
-112%
Idle Maximum *
1.1
2.33
-112%
1.78
-62%
2.3
-109%
1.53
-39%
2.23
-103%
Load Average *
3.86
4.76
-23%
4.42
-15%
4.89
-27%
3.17
18%
7.45
-93%
Load Maximum *
5.97
6.39
-7%
6.3
-6%
7.99
-34%
8.54
-43%
9.28
-55%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
25h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 08min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 20min
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL
3300 mAh
BQ Aquaris X Pro
3100 mAh
Honor 9
3200 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1
2700 mAh
Batterijduur
-5%
0%
-15%
3%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1546
1665
8%
1840
19%
1399
-10%
1754
13%
1612
4%
H.264
908
698
-23%
644
-29%
564
-38%
799
-12%
580
-36%
WiFi v1.3
646
562
-13%
730
13%
516
-20%
718
11%
601
-7%
Load
260
286
10%
254
-2%
278
7%
257
-1%
172
-34%

Pro

+ hoogwaardig design
+ echte Dual-SIM-functionaliteit
+ nauwkeurige GPS
+ water- en stofdicht
+ helder Super-AMOLED-scherm met prima kleuren
+ goede camera
+ fast charging

Contra

- onmogelijk om voorgeïnstalleerde apps te verwijderen
- PWM-flikkeren van het scherm
- interne opslag niet erg snel
- throttling onder belasting
De Galaxy A8 (2018). Testtoestel van allestechnick.
De Galaxy A8 (2018). Testtoestel van allestechnick.

Dit is de verkort versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Met de Galaxy A8 (2018) heeft Samsung een een prima mid-range smartphone gemaakt met heel wat positieve punten. Het design voelt en ziet er premium uit, terwijl het toestel ook IP68-gecertificeerd is. Het Super-AMOLED Infinity-Display ziet er indrukwekkend uit, is goed gekalibreerd en helder en heeft een hoge resolutie. De Dual-SIM-variant is ook daadwerkelijk Dual-SIM, terwijl uitbreiding met microSD-kaarten mogelijk is via een aparte sleuf, i.p.v. moeten kiezen tussen een tweede SIM- of microSD-kaart. Liefhebbers van selfies krijgen een dual-frontcamera met prima eigenschappen, die ruimte laat voor gimmicks, maar toch goede beelden schiet. Dit laatste geldt ook voor de 16-MP-camera aan de achterzijde.

Goede prestaties, maar aan een bedenkelijke prijs. De Galaxy A8 (2018) concurreert onnodig concurrentie voor zichzelf; de snellere en beter uitgerust high-end Galaxy S8 kost ongeveer 100 euro meer.

Ondanks de positieve punten zou de ambitieuze prijs van 499 euro potentiële kopers kunnen afschrikken. Hoewel je hem nu ook voor minder geld kan vinden, blijft de prijs van de Galaxy A8 (2018) dicht bij die van de Galaxy S8, die betere features en prestaties op tafel legt voor maar 100 euro meer op het moment van schrijven. Er bestaan ook alternatieven voor de Galaxy A8 (2018) die even snel zijn, zoals de Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL of de BQ Aquaris X Pro. Deze zijn verkrijgbaar voor ongeveer 450 en 430 euro, respectievelijk.

Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 - 25-02-2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing
86%
Toetsenbord
72 / 75 → 96%
Aanwijsapparaat
92%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
47 / 60 → 78%
Gewicht
90%
Batterij
95%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
41 / 63 → 65%
Applicatie-performance
58 / 70 → 82%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
80%
Gemiddelde
78%
86%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Smartphone
Manuel Masiero, 2018-03- 6 (Update: 2018-03- 6)