Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) Smartphone

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, T. Hinum (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 26-11-2018

Alle goede dingen komen per drie. Volgens onze tests is het hoogtepunt van de Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) niet zijn triple-camera. Het is een andere hardwarecomponent die alle andere mid-range smartphones achter zich laat.

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Galaxy Serie)
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G71 MP2
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
6 inch 18.5:9, 2220 x 1080 pixel 411 PPI, capacitief multi-touchscreen, Super AMOLED, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audio-klink, Card Reader: opslaguitbreiding: microSD (tot 512 GB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: accelerometer, gyroscoop, afstandssensor, kompas, Miracast, VoLTE, WiFi-Calling, LED, OTG
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM band: GSM 850 MHz, GSM 900 MHz, DCS 1800 MHz, PCS 1900 MHz; UMTS band: B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B5 (850), B8 (900); LTE band: B1 (2100), B3 (1800), B5 (850), B7 (2600), B8 (900), B20 (800), 4G TDD LTE B38 (2600), B40 (2300), B41 (2500), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.5 x 159.8 x 76.8
Batterij
3300 mAh, Gesprekstijd 3G (volgens fabrikant): 19 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 24 MPix 24-MP hoofdcamera met diafragma van f/1.7, een 8-MP-sensor met een 120-graden, f/2.4 en 5-MP-sensor met f/2.2; videoresolutie: Full HD (1920 x 1080 pixels) @30fps
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono-luidspreker, Toetsenbord: on-screen-toetsenbord, modular power supply, USB cable, Samsung Experience UI, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waarde hoofd: 0.335 W/Kg SAR-waarde lichaam: 1.425 W/Kg , fanless
Gewicht
168 g, Voeding: 61 g
Prijs
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 vs Honor 8X
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018

Formaat Vergelijking

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +142%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s ∼46% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼41% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼41%
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
275 MBit/s ∼41% -1%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼37% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s ∼36% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=311)
212 MBit/s ∼31% -24%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
207 (min: 162, max: 243) MBit/s ∼31% -26%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s ∼51% +4%
BQ Aquaris X2
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
322 (min: 275) MBit/s ∼50% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼49%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼47% -4%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s ∼45% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s ∼42% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=311)
206 MBit/s ∼32% -36%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 136, max: 231) MBit/s ∼28% -43%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (265-284)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø320 (164-362)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
GPS Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Standaardhoek
Standaardhoek
Groothoek
Groothoek
Standaardhoek
Standaardhoek
Groothoek
Groothoek
Automatische modus
Automatische modus
Live Focus modus
Live Focus modus
Foto 's nachts
Foto 's nachts
Foto overdag
Foto overdag
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Galaxy A7 2018
Galaxy A7 2018
583
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
574
cd/m²
570
cd/m²
546
cd/m²
583
cd/m²
571
cd/m²
553
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 583 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 565.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.79 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 93 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 570 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
98.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Xiaomi Mi 6X
LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18
Honor 8X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5
BQ Aquaris X2
IPS LCD, 2160x1080, 5.65
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Screen
-84%
-101%
-173%
-91%
-191%
-124%
-170%
-48%
Brightness middle
570
541
-5%
458
-20%
459
-19%
489
-14%
484
-15%
631
11%
513
-10%
566
-1%
Brightness
565
538
-5%
463
-18%
441
-22%
486
-14%
469
-17%
622
10%
506
-10%
564
0%
Brightness Distribution
93
96
3%
92
-1%
91
-2%
93
0%
93
0%
96
3%
93
0%
94
1%
Black Level *
0.22
0.47
0.34
0.55
0.61
0.42
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.5
5.8
-287%
4
-167%
5.8
-287%
3.8
-153%
7.3
-387%
5.5
-267%
5
-233%
2.7
-80%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.6
7.4
-106%
10.7
-197%
7.1
-97%
11.1
-208%
8.5
-136%
11.4
-217%
5.4
-50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.2
2.7
-125%
4.7
-292%
7.3
-508%
4.4
-267%
7.4
-517%
5.6
-367%
7.8
-550%
3.1
-158%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.07 106%
2.19 100%
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
2.38 92%
2.2 100%
2.15 102%
CCT
6504 100%
6570 99%
7425 88%
7984 81%
7213 90%
8534 76%
7531 86%
7964 82%
6335 103%
Contrast
2082
977
1438
880
1034
1221
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 240.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 240.4 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2.8 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4026 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3680 Points ∼26% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5486 Points ∼38% +36%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14369 Points ∼100% +257%
Honor 8X
4083 Points ∼28% +1%
BQ Aquaris X2
4309 Points ∼30% +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (3680 - 4026, n=2)
3853 Points ∼27% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=198)
4508 Points ∼31% +12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4429 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points ∼48% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼64% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5843 Points ∼64% +32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9182 Points ∼100% +107%
Honor 8X
5557 Points ∼61% +25%
BQ Aquaris X2
4974 Points ∼54% +12%
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points ∼45% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4429 - 4431, n=2)
4430 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=248)
4298 Points ∼47% -3%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1525 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points ∼62% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼67% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1620 Points ∼66% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2468 Points ∼100% +62%
Honor 8X
1614 Points ∼65% +6%
BQ Aquaris X2
1323 Points ∼54% -13%
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points ∼35% -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1525 - 1526, n=2)
1526 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=249)
1267 Points ∼51% -17%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5387 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points ∼64% -3%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼75% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5995 Points ∼74% +11%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8101 Points ∼100% +50%
Honor 8X
7141 Points ∼88% +33%
BQ Aquaris X2
5706 Points ∼70% +6%
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points ∼62% -7%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (5214 - 5387, n=2)
5301 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3146 - 9868, n=256)
4551 Points ∼56% -16%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
5625 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points ∼61% +5%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼71% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
6723 Points ∼70% +20%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
9664 Points ∼100% +72%
Honor 8X
8939 Points ∼92% +59%
BQ Aquaris X2
6437 Points ∼67% +14%
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points ∼60% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (5625 - 5916, n=2)
5771 Points ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (4058 - 13531, n=424)
4956 Points ∼51% -12%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1845 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2051 Points ∼74% +11%
Nokia 7 Plus
2789 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2764 Points ∼99% +50%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2257 Points ∼81% +22%
Honor 8X
2702 Points ∼97% +46%
BQ Aquaris X2
2396 Points ∼86% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2
1696 Points ∼61% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1845 - 2051, n=2)
1948 Points ∼70% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼61% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
629 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
577 Points ∼13% -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
1239 Points ∼28% +97%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1244 Points ∼28% +98%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4468 Points ∼100% +610%
Honor 8X
801 Points ∼18% +27%
BQ Aquaris X2
872 Points ∼20% +39%
Sony Xperia XA2
790 Points ∼18% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (577 - 629, n=2)
603 Points ∼13% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼33% +133%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
737 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
687 Points ∼19% -7%
Nokia 7 Plus
1441 Points ∼39% +96%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1417 Points ∼39% +92%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3669 Points ∼100% +398%
Honor 8X
950 Points ∼26% +29%
BQ Aquaris X2
1016 Points ∼28% +38%
Sony Xperia XA2
896 Points ∼24% +22%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (687 - 737, n=2)
712 Points ∼19% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼37% +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1871 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2003 Points ∼71% +7%
Nokia 7 Plus
2768 Points ∼98% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2815 Points ∼99% +50%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2832 Points ∼100% +51%
Honor 8X
2697 Points ∼95% +44%
BQ Aquaris X2
2359 Points ∼83% +26%
Sony Xperia XA2
1657 Points ∼59% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1871 - 2003, n=2)
1937 Points ∼68% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=293)
1686 Points ∼60% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
954 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
971 Points ∼14% +2%
Nokia 7 Plus
1980 Points ∼29% +108%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1981 Points ∼29% +108%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6898 Points ∼100% +623%
Honor 8X
1316 Points ∼19% +38%
BQ Aquaris X2
1402 Points ∼20% +47%
Sony Xperia XA2
1305 Points ∼19% +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (954 - 971, n=2)
963 Points ∼14% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=293)
2062 Points ∼30% +116%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1071 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1097 Points ∼21% +2%
Nokia 7 Plus
2114 Points ∼40% +97%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2121 Points ∼41% +98%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5230 Points ∼100% +388%
Honor 8X
1485 Points ∼28% +39%
BQ Aquaris X2
1540 Points ∼29% +44%
Sony Xperia XA2
1370 Points ∼26% +28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1071 - 1097, n=2)
1084 Points ∼21% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=294)
1729 Points ∼33% +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1821 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points ∼71% +7%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2757 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2528 Points ∼92% +39%
Honor 8X
2663 Points ∼97% +46%
BQ Aquaris X2
2353 Points ∼85% +29%
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points ∼59% -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1821 - 1950, n=2)
1886 Points ∼68% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼60% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
634 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points ∼13% -3%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼24% +83%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1164 Points ∼25% +84%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4746 Points ∼100% +649%
Honor 8X
798 Points ∼17% +26%
BQ Aquaris X2
816 Points ∼17% +29%
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points ∼15% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (618 - 634, n=2)
626 Points ∼13% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼25% +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
741 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points ∼18% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼34% +80%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1335 Points ∼34% +80%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3972 Points ∼100% +436%
Honor 8X
945 Points ∼24% +28%
BQ Aquaris X2
955 Points ∼24% +29%
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points ∼20% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (729 - 741, n=2)
735 Points ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼29% +53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1829 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points ∼71% +6%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2680 Points ∼98% +47%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
2720 Points ∼99% +49%
Honor 8X
2645 Points ∼97% +45%
BQ Aquaris X2
2338 Points ∼86% +28%
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points ∼64% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1829 - 1946, n=2)
1888 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=385)
1538 Points ∼56% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
845 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points ∼11% +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼23% +124%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1891 Points ∼23% +124%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
8261 Points ∼100% +878%
Honor 8X
1280 Points ∼15% +51%
BQ Aquaris X2
1337 Points ∼16% +58%
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points ∼15% +48%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (845 - 879, n=2)
862 Points ∼10% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=385)
1627 Points ∼20% +93%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
960 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points ∼18% +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼36% +112%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2023 Points ∼36% +111%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
5687 Points ∼100% +492%
Honor 8X
1445 Points ∼25% +51%
BQ Aquaris X2
1478 Points ∼26% +54%
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points ∼23% +39%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (960 - 1001, n=2)
981 Points ∼17% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=393)
1384 Points ∼24% +44%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
13914 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points ∼38% -4%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼58% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21016 Points ∼60% +51%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
34928 Points ∼100% +151%
Honor 8X
17450 Points ∼50% +25%
BQ Aquaris X2
16747 Points ∼48% +20%
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points ∼38% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (13306 - 13914, n=2)
13610 Points ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=540)
12875 Points ∼37% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15567 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points ∼19% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼36% +88%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
28984 Points ∼35% +86%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
82125 Points ∼100% +428%
Honor 8X
21533 Points ∼26% +38%
BQ Aquaris X2
20806 Points ∼25% +34%
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points ∼23% +19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (15262 - 15567, n=2)
15415 Points ∼19% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=540)
17971 Points ∼22% +15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
15167 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points ∼23% -3%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼42% +75%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
26731 Points ∼42% +76%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
63159 Points ∼100% +316%
Honor 8X
20468 Points ∼32% +35%
BQ Aquaris X2
19743 Points ∼31% +30%
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points ∼27% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (14779 - 15167, n=2)
14973 Points ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=541)
15098 Points ∼24% 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps ∼23%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
50 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
150 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
39 fps ∼26%
BQ Aquaris X2
36 fps ∼24%
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps ∼20%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
34 fps ∼23%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=565)
31.3 fps ∼21%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps ∼52%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
48 fps ∼80%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
60 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
36 fps ∼60%
BQ Aquaris X2
34 fps ∼57%
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps ∼52%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
31 fps ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=568)
24.9 fps ∼42%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps ∼23%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
23 fps ∼32%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
71 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
21 fps ∼30%
BQ Aquaris X2
16 fps ∼23%
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps ∼20%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
16 fps ∼23%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=487)
16.8 fps ∼24%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps ∼26%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21 fps ∼36%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
58 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
19 fps ∼33%
BQ Aquaris X2
15 fps ∼26%
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps ∼26%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
15 fps ∼26%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=490)
16 fps ∼28%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps ∼28%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
15 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
14 fps ∼40%
BQ Aquaris X2
10 fps ∼29%
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps ∼28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
9.9 fps ∼28%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼41%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps ∼18%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
14 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
54 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
13 fps ∼24%
BQ Aquaris X2
9.8 fps ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps ∼19%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
9.6 fps ∼18%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼26%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
5.2 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
22 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
4.1 fps ∼19%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼46%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
3.2 fps ∼23%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
14 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
2.6 fps ∼19%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼46%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
8.2 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
31 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
5.2 fps ∼17%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼46%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
8.6 fps ∼27%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
32 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
4.6 fps ∼14%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼49%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps ∼17%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
9 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
35 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
7.6 fps ∼22%
BQ Aquaris X2
6.3 fps ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps ∼16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
6 fps ∼17%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼28%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps ∼18%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
8.6 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
33 fps ∼100%
Honor 8X
6.4 fps ∼19%
BQ Aquaris X2
6 fps ∼18%
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps ∼18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
5.8 fps ∼18%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼27%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
122826 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points ∼44% -5%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼54% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
140714 Points ∼53% +15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
263165 Points ∼100% +114%
Honor 8X
140188 Points ∼53% +14%
BQ Aquaris X2
116748 Points ∼44% -5%
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points ∼34% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (116746 - 122826, n=2)
119786 Points ∼46% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=171)
117893 Points ∼45% -4%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
87728 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
83284 Points ∼37% -5%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points ∼52% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
110680 Points ∼49% +26%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
227026 Points ∼100% +159%
Honor 8X
112870 Points ∼50% +29%
BQ Aquaris X2
96430 Points ∼42% +10%
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points ∼32% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (83284 - 87728, n=2)
85506 Points ∼38% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=394)
76519 Points ∼34% -13%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1090 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points ∼92% +10%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼85% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1108 Points ∼85% +2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
1296 Points ∼100% +19%
Honor 8X
1207 Points ∼93% +11%
BQ Aquaris X2
1059 Points ∼82% -3%
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points ∼71% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1090 - 1195, n=2)
1143 Points ∼88% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=500)
697 Points ∼54% -36%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
1356 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points ∼17% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼29% +69%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2295 Points ∼29% +69%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
7945 Points ∼100% +486%
Honor 8X
1456 Points ∼18% +7%
BQ Aquaris X2
1597 Points ∼20% +18%
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points ∼19% +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1331 - 1356, n=2)
1344 Points ∼17% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=500)
1735 Points ∼22% +28%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2445 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points ∼52% -7%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼57% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2470 Points ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3239 Points ∼74% +32%
Honor 8X
4360 Points ∼100% +78%
BQ Aquaris X2
2016 Points ∼46% -18%
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points ∼30% -46%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (2275 - 2445, n=2)
2360 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=500)
1243 Points ∼29% -49%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
4506 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points ∼67% -3%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼76% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
4797 Points ∼74% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6506 Points ∼100% +44%
Honor 8X
5529 Points ∼85% +23%
BQ Aquaris X2
4434 Points ∼68% -2%
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points ∼50% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4358 - 4506, n=2)
4432 Points ∼68% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=500)
2509 Points ∼39% -44%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
2009 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points ∼52% -1%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼62% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2343 Points ∼61% +17%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
3838 Points ∼100% +91%
Honor 8X
2410 Points ∼63% +20%
BQ Aquaris X2
1972 Points ∼51% -2%
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points ∼41% -22%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (1993 - 2009, n=2)
2001 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=504)
1253 Points ∼33% -38%

Legende

 
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
75.959 Points ∼100% +58%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼71% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
52.139 Points ∼69% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points ∼65% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (48 - 49.1, n=2)
48.5 Points ∼64% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼63%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
47.012 Points ∼62% -2%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
44.245 Points ∼58% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=423)
36.7 Points ∼48% -24%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.368 Points ∼36% -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
14514 Points ∼100% +58%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼75% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
9995 Points ∼69% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points ∼64% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (9165 - 9350, n=2)
9258 Points ∼64% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼63%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
9095 Points ∼63% -1%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
9004 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=559)
5558 Points ∼38% -39%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points ∼33% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=579)
11477 ms * ∼100% -178%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10235.7 ms * ∼89% -148%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
4768.9 ms * ∼42% -16%
BQ Aquaris X2
4733 ms * ∼41% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275.2 ms * ∼37% -4%
Honor 8X
4247.7 ms * ∼37% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (4123 - 4275, n=2)
4199 ms * ∼37% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼36%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼34% +4%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
2713.6 ms * ∼24% +34%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼100% +12%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼99% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
61 Points ∼96% +7%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
58 Points ∼91% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼90%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
57 Points ∼90% 0%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
54 Points ∼85% -5%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)
223 Points ∼100% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
173 Points ∼78% +3%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼75% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼75%
BQ Aquaris X2 (Chrome 67)
164 Points ∼74% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 7885 (156 - 168, n=2)
162 Points ∼73% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points ∼70% -7%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
147 Points ∼66% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼50% -34%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points ∼48% -37%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Galaxy A8 2018Nokia 7 PlusXiaomi Mi 6XXiaomi Pocophone F1Honor 8XBQ Aquaris X2Sony Xperia XA2Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-2%
15%
5%
39%
51%
3%
-6%
2%
-24%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
62.31
-3%
65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
68.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
62.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
64.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
54.3 (14.1 - 74.7, n=71)
-16%
45.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=323)
-29%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
82.21
5%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
9%
75.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
82.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
86.01 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
72.6 (21.1 - 86.9, n=71)
-7%
64 (8.2 - 96.5, n=323)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
15.45
14.69
-5%
19.62
27%
6.89
-55%
17.81
15%
59.87
288%
14.4
-7%
13.82
-11%
19.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=78)
28%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=608)
4%
Random Read 4KB
83.98
82.62
-2%
54.65
-35%
72.98
-13%
101.01
20%
49.54
-41%
43.9
-48%
43.07
-49%
50.3 (11.4 - 149, n=78)
-40%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=608)
-54%
Sequential Write 256KB
104.87
104.2
-1%
211.6
102%
203.7
94%
155.57
48%
169.98
62%
188.7
80%
127.38
21%
164 (40 - 246, n=78)
56%
79.8 (2.99 - 246, n=608)
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB
295.76
299.94
1%
283.12
-4%
271.98
-8%
705.38
138%
283.87
-4%
270.5
-9%
271.46
-8%
269 (115 - 704, n=78)
-9%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=608)
-22%
010203040Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø29.3 (22-31)
; HD: Ø28.7 (19-31)
010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.4 (21-31)
Max. Belasting
 34.7 °C34.7 °C29.4 °C 
 33.9 °C34.8 °C29.4 °C 
 33.4 °C33.2 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 34.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.6 °C
28.3 °C30.5 °C34.5 °C
26.9 °C29.5 °C35.8 °C
27.6 °C29.7 °C33.2 °C
Maximum: 35.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.7 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  25.5 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.733.8252528.73126.828.44026.328.75029.838.26327.424.7802123.210019.525.812518.825.716019.240.420017.641.325016.947.431515.855.54001556.75001562.863014.766.980014.868100014.666.5125014.369.2160013.471.8200014.472.5250014.473.2315014.876.640001577.7500014.875.3630014.774.380001575.31000014.972.81250015.264.51600015.755.1SPL26.885.5N0.961.4median 15median 66.9Delta1.210.835.240.932.939.937.234.931.740.339.639.128.334.127.332.326.928.726.731.5243920.946.220.948.319.555.718.562.917.565.817.569.615.769.215.87016.675.215.873.715.474.215.573.51671.615.873.11671.616.367.116.367.716.271.816.475.516.459.928.684.11.158.5median 16.4median 69.22.18.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Xiaomi Mi 6X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.22 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.71 / 1.36 / 1.47 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.13 / 7.89 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6X
3010 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 7885
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
-9%
-7%
-15%
-24%
-14%
19%
10%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.71
0.67
6%
0.65
8%
0.65
8%
0.65
8%
0.92
-30%
0.65
8%
0.39
45%
0.69 (0.67 - 0.71, n=2)
3%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=642)
-24%
Idle Average *
1.36
1.02
25%
1.76
-29%
1.94
-43%
1.97
-45%
2.3
-69%
2.24
-65%
1.61
-18%
1.19 (1.02 - 1.36, n=2)
12%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=641)
-27%
Idle Maximum *
1.47
1.1
25%
1.78
-21%
1.97
-34%
2.01
-37%
2.32
-58%
2.26
-54%
1.62
-10%
1.285 (1.1 - 1.47, n=2)
13%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=642)
-36%
Load Average *
5.13
3.86
25%
4.47
13%
4.65
9%
4.29
16%
4.37
15%
3.87
25%
3.12
39%
4.5 (3.86 - 5.13, n=2)
12%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=636)
21%
Load Maximum *
7.89
5.97
24%
9.13
-16%
5.93
25%
9.05
-15%
6.13
22%
6.8
14%
4.92
38%
6.93 (5.97 - 7.89, n=2)
12%
5.76 (1.2 - 14.2, n=636)
27%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
24h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 56min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 33min
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 6X
3010 mAh
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
4000 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
BQ Aquaris X2
3100 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Batterijduur
4%
-8%
-26%
17%
41%
2%
30%
Reader / Idle
1467
1546
5%
1703
16%
1046
-29%
2088
42%
2503
71%
H.264
836
908
9%
706
-16%
608
-27%
936
12%
766
-8%
WiFi v1.3
605
646
7%
672
11%
495
-18%
808
34%
852
41%
617
2%
886
46%
Load
273
260
-5%
158
-42%
192
-30%
220
-19%
298
9%

Pro

+ uitstekend OLED-paneel
+ boede batterijduur
+ prima bouwkwaliteit
+ precieze GPS
+ drie sleuven
+ triple-camera

Contra

- plastic frame
- SoC eerder ondermaats
- oude USB-standaard
- trage vingerafdruklezer
Onder de loep: Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018). Testtoestel voorzien door notebooksbilliger.com
Onder de loep: Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018). Testtoestel voorzien door notebooksbilliger.com

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) blinkt uit met zijn uitstekende Super AMOLED-scherm dat erg helder wordt en uiterst precieze kleuren en kijkhoeken biedt. Bovendien is het contrast perfect dankzij de onklopbare zwartwaarde, die typisch is voor OLED-schermen. Al bij al is dit scherm ongeëvenaard in zijn prijsklasse.

We waren minder onder de indruk van Samsung's eigen mid-range processor. De Exynos 7885 vertoont verschillende zwaktes bij het uitvoeren van alledaagse taken. De systeemprestaties van de Samsung-SoC kunnen niet op tegen de concurrentie van Qualcomm. De Honor 8X met de nieuwe HiSilicon Kirin 710 bieden ook meer consistente prestaties.

Het uithangbord van de Galaxy A7 (2018) is zijn triple-camera, die een grotere veelzijdigheid en betere fotokwaliteit biedt. De groothoeklens en Live Focus-functionaliteit zorgen voor interessante mogelijkheden, al bleek deze laatste functionaliteit soms wat teleurstellende resultaten op te leveren.

Net als bij de Honor 8X vragen we ons af waarom Samsung ervoor heeft gekozen om zijn model van 2018 uit te rusten met de oude microUSB-standaard. Dit slaat nergens op, zeker omdat de Galaxy A5 van 2017 reeds over een USB Type-C-poort beschikte.

Liefhebbers van mooie schermen kunnen niet voorbij de Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) als ze op zoek zijn naar een geschikt toestel voor een betaalbare prijs.

Er zijn veel interessante alternatieven in deze mid-range categorie, waaronder de krachtige Pocophone F1 of de veel goedkopere prijs/prestaties-kampioen Xiaomi Mi A2. Als de prijs van de Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) wat zou dalen, zou hij met zijn uitstekende scherm en groothoeklens een ijzersterk alternatief zijn.

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 - 19-11-2018 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
84%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
89%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
44 / 60 → 74%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
94%
Beeldscherm
91%
Gaming-performance
42 / 63 → 66%
Applicatie-performance
58 / 70 → 83%
Temperatuur
93%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
67 / 91 → 74%
Camera
70%
Gemiddelde
76%
86%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) Smartphone
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-11-26 (Update: 2018-11-26)