Kort testrapport Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Smartphone
Prijsbreker De Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is een smartphone met hardware van een vlaggenschip, een goede camera, lange batterijduur, maar een prijskaartje van minder dan €350 (~$404). Kom in dit testrapport te weten of Xiaomi's concept van een betaalbaar vlaggenschip ook werkt en waarop de fabrikant moest besparen om de prijs binnen de perken te houden.
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
Formaat Vergelijking
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=342) | |
Honor 10 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Honor 10 | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=342) |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 93 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 489 cd/m²
Contrast: 1438:1 (Zwart: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18 | Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84 | OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28 | Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2 | LG G7 ThinQ IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 9% | 15% | 7% | 27% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 489 | 555 13% | 430 -12% | 458 -6% | 565 16% | 974 99% |
Brightness | 486 | 537 10% | 437 -10% | 463 -5% | 571 17% | 975 101% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 94 1% | 87 -6% | 92 -1% | 96 3% | 96 3% |
Black Level * | 0.34 | 0.39 -15% | 0.22 35% | 0.49 -44% | ||
Contrast | 1438 | 1423 -1% | 2082 45% | 1988 38% | ||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 3.8 | 2.3 39% | 2.3 39% | 4 -5% | 2.3 39% | 5.4 -42% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7.1 | 6 15% | 4.6 35% | 7.4 -4% | 4.8 32% | 13.1 -85% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 4.4 | 3.9 11% | 2.4 45% | 4.7 -7% | 1.9 57% | 5 -14% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 7213 90% | 6212 105% | 6160 106% | 7425 88% | 6332 103% | 7480 87% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 2315 Hz | ≤ 20 % helderheid instelling | |
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2315 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 20 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 2315 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9258 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. |
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 9.2 ms stijging | |
↘ 14.8 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
44 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 21.6 ms stijging | |
↘ 22.4 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=21) | |
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=422) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=25) | |
Average of class Smartphone (54871 - 348178, n=203) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8099 - 9868, n=25) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2828 - 9868, n=288) | |
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3977 - 13531, n=456) |
Geekbench 4.3 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=22) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1131 - 21070, n=227) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1635 - 11598, n=278) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (590 - 4824, n=279) |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (503 - 4216, n=381) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 5246, n=382) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (440 - 4734, n=391) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4215, n=415) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=415) | |
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=423) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=572) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1152 - 162695, n=572) | |
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=573) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=25) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=597) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=600) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=519) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=522) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=25) | |
Average of class Smartphone (4.7 - 88, n=380) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 110, n=383) |
GFXBench | |
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.5 - 54, n=311) | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | |
Honor 10 | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=24) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 58, n=314) |
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde) | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
OnePlus 6 | |
Nokia 7 Plus | |
LG G7 ThinQ | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
Huawei P20 Pro | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=79) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68) | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=455) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=25) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68) | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=591) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=611) | |
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=25) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68) | |
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (260 - 291, n=22) | |
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68) | |
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
Honor 10 (Chrome 66) | |
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (77 - 362, n=300) |
* ... kleiner is beter
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 | Nokia 7 Plus | LG G7 ThinQ | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | Honor 10 | OnePlus 6 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -12% | 8% | 17% | -7% | 225% | 23% | 33% | -38% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 62.31 -5% | 62.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4% | 67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2% | 30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -54% | 50.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=26) -23% | 46.9 (59.5 - 87.1, n=351) -28% | ||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 82.21 -4% | 84.72 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1% | 79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7% | 34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -60% | 67.1 (18 - 86.6, n=26) -21% | 65.2 (76.6 - 96.5, n=351) -24% | ||
Random Write 4KB | 17.81 | 19.62 10% | 23.26 31% | 22.74 28% | 21.75 22% | 163 815% | 21.8 22% | 50.5 (8.77 - 156, n=34) 184% | 17.6 (0.14 - 250, n=639) -1% |
Random Read 4KB | 101.01 | 54.65 -46% | 110.46 9% | 129.68 28% | 135.99 35% | 145.88 44% | 137 36% | 134 (78.2 - 173, n=34) 33% | 40.4 (1.59 - 173, n=639) -60% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 155.57 | 211.6 36% | 176.45 13% | 204.94 32% | 170.98 10% | 192.12 23% | 201.4 29% | 193 (133 - 229, n=34) 24% | 84.4 (2.99 - 253, n=639) -46% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 705.38 | 283.12 -60% | 695.15 -1% | 818.69 16% | 748.59 6% | 827.69 17% | 725.6 3% | 727 (529 - 895, n=34) 3% | 238 (12.1 - 912, n=639) -66% |