Kort testrapport Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Smartphone

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 03-10-2018

Prijsbreker De Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is een smartphone met hardware van een vlaggenschip, een goede camera, lange batterijduur, maar een prijskaartje van minder dan €350 (~$404). Kom in dit testrapport te weten of Xiaomi's concept van een betaalbaar vlaggenschip ook werkt en waarop de fabrikant moest besparen om de prijs binnen de perken te houden.

Testtoestel voorzien door cyberport.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000 Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

Formaat Vergelijking

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	677 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	675 (min: 630, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	652 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
OnePlus 6 Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	609 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Honor 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	210 MBit/s ∼31% -69%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 939, n=279)	199 MBit/s ∼29% -71%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	647 (min: 598, max: 665) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus 6 Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	612 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	519 MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Honor 10 Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	236 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 703, n=279)	195 MBit/s ∼30% -70%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø674 (630-704)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø647 (598-665)

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden


483 cd/m²	468 cd/m²	477 cd/m²
502 cd/m²	489 cd/m²	483 cd/m²
498 cd/m²	483 cd/m²	494 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 502 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 486.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.09 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 93 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 489 cd/m²
Contrast: 1438:1 (Zwart: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22

	Xiaomi Pocophone F1 IPS, 2246x1080, 6.18	Honor 10 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84	OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28	Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2	LG G7 ThinQ IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1
Screen		9%	15%	7%	27%	7%
Brightness middle	489	555 13%	430 -12%	458 -6%	565 16%	974 99%
Brightness	486	537 10%	437 -10%	463 -5%	571 17%	975 101%
Brightness Distribution	93	94 1%	87 -6%	92 -1%	96 3%	96 3%
Black Level *	0.34	0.39 -15%		0.22 35%		0.49 -44%
Contrast	1438	1423 -1%		2082 45%		1988 38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	3.8	2.3 39%	2.3 39%	4 -5%	2.3 39%	5.4 -42%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7.1	6 15%	4.6 35%	7.4 -4%	4.8 32%	13.1 -85%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.4	3.9 11%	2.4 45%	4.7 -7%	1.9 57%	5 -14%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.19 ^100%	2.28 ^96%	2.19 ^100%	2.16 ^102%	2.31 ^95%
CCT	7213 ^90%	6212 ^105%	6160 ^106%	7425 ^88%	6332 ^103%	7480 ^87%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen

2315 Hz

≤ 20 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2315 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 20 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 2315 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8677 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
24 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 9.2 ms stijging
24 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 14.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
44 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 21.6 ms stijging
44 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 22.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	227026 Points ∼99%
Honor 10	174272 Points ∼76% -23%
OnePlus 6	230421 Points ∼100% +1%
Nokia 7 Plus	117165 Points ∼51% -48%
LG G7 ThinQ	223464 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	222290 Points ∼96% -2%
Huawei P20 Pro	179709 Points ∼78% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	226124 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 232931, n=11)	221422 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=366)	72912 Points ∼32% -68%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	263165 Points ∼98%
Honor 10	205297 Points ∼76% -22%
OnePlus 6	266686 Points ∼99% +1%
Nokia 7 Plus	141701 Points ∼53% -46%
LG G7 ThinQ	256276 Points ∼95% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	250577 Points ∼93% -5%
Huawei P20 Pro	207959 Points ∼77% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	246366 Points ∼91% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 290397, n=15)	269351 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=145)	111758 Points ∼41% -58%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	8101 Points ∼98%
Honor 10	7046 Points ∼85% -13%
OnePlus 6	8282 Points ∼100% +2%
Nokia 7 Plus	6077 Points ∼73% -25%
LG G7 ThinQ	7717 Points ∼93% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	5319 Points ∼64% -34%
Huawei P20 Pro	6982 Points ∼84% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	8178 Points ∼99% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=15)	8225 Points ∼99% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (6998 - 9868, n=233)	4440 Points ∼54% -45%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	9664 Points ∼98%
Honor 10	8530 Points ∼87% -12%
OnePlus 6	9630 Points ∼98% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus	6825 Points ∼69% -29%
LG G7 ThinQ	9503 Points ∼96% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	5822 Points ∼59% -40%
Huawei P20 Pro	8115 Points ∼82% -16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	9858 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=13)	9824 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4147 - 13211, n=396)	4801 Points ∼49% -50%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	1296 Points ∼93%
Honor 10	1316 Points ∼94% +2%
OnePlus 6	1386 Points ∼99% +7%
Nokia 7 Plus	1101 Points ∼79% -15%
LG G7 ThinQ	1374 Points ∼98% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	1109 Points ∼79% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro	1273 Points ∼91% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	1400 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=13)	1356 Points ∼97% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=471)	680 Points ∼49% -48%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	7945 Points ∼100%
Honor 10	4397 Points ∼55% -45%
OnePlus 6	7949 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus	2298 Points ∼29% -71%
LG G7 ThinQ	7906 Points ∼99% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	6370 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro	3725 Points ∼47% -53%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	7743 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 7965, n=13)	7736 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15875, n=471)	1622 Points ∼20% -80%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	3239 Points ∼80%
Honor 10	3808 Points ∼94% +18%
OnePlus 6	3799 Points ∼94% +17%
Nokia 7 Plus	2503 Points ∼62% -23%
LG G7 ThinQ	3744 Points ∼92% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	2625 Points ∼65% -19%
Huawei P20 Pro	4050 Points ∼100% +25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	3704 Points ∼91% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 4798, n=13)	3442 Points ∼85% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4798, n=471)	1171 Points ∼29% -64%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	6506 Points ∼77%
Honor 10	5882 Points ∼70% -10%
OnePlus 6	8228 Points ∼98% +26%
Nokia 7 Plus	4976 Points ∼59% -24%
LG G7 ThinQ	8070 Points ∼96% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	6413 Points ∼76% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro	5965 Points ∼71% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	8418 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8435, n=13)	7672 Points ∼91% +18%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=471)	2367 Points ∼28% -64%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	3838 Points ∼89%
Honor 10	3374 Points ∼78% -12%
OnePlus 6	4308 Points ∼100% +12%
Nokia 7 Plus	2369 Points ∼55% -38%
LG G7 ThinQ	4257 Points ∼99% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3302 Points ∼77% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro	3271 Points ∼76% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	4288 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3489 - 4478, n=13)	4056 Points ∼94% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=475)	1185 Points ∼28% -69%

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	14369 Points ∼100%
Honor 10	8634 Points ∼60% -40%
LG G7 ThinQ	13497 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	6202 Points ∼43% -57%
Huawei P20 Pro	8025 Points ∼56% -44%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	14417 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12493 - 14417, n=12)	13856 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 14417, n=170)	4186 Points ∼29% -71%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	9182 Points ∼100%
Honor 10	6610 Points ∼72% -28%
Nokia 7 Plus	5867 Points ∼64% -36%
LG G7 ThinQ	9029 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	8963 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei P20 Pro	6756 Points ∼74% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	8522 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7983 - 9182, n=14)	8707 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1099 - 11598, n=220)	4163 Points ∼45% -55%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	2468 Points ∼65%
Honor 10	1890 Points ∼50% -23%
Nokia 7 Plus	1646 Points ∼44% -33%
LG G7 ThinQ	2448 Points ∼65% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3776 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei P20 Pro	1922 Points ∼51% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	2457 Points ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2330 - 2468, n=14)	2441 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=221)	1229 Points ∼33% -50%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	2528 Points ∼70%
Honor 10	2582 Points ∼71% +2%
OnePlus 6	3432 Points ∼95% +36%
Nokia 7 Plus	2749 Points ∼76% +9%
LG G7 ThinQ	3255 Points ∼90% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	2469 Points ∼68% -2%
Huawei P20 Pro	2926 Points ∼81% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	3620 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3669, n=14)	3196 Points ∼88% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=325)	1588 Points ∼44% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	4746 Points ∼91%
Honor 10	2993 Points ∼57% -37%
OnePlus 6	5212 Points ∼100% +10%
Nokia 7 Plus	1161 Points ∼22% -76%
LG G7 ThinQ	5006 Points ∼96% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3582 Points ∼69% -25%
Huawei P20 Pro	3017 Points ∼58% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	5190 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5220, n=14)	4908 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5220, n=325)	1124 Points ∼22% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	3972 Points ∼84%
Honor 10	2891 Points ∼61% -27%
OnePlus 6	4673 Points ∼99% +18%
Nokia 7 Plus	1332 Points ∼28% -66%
LG G7 ThinQ	4471 Points ∼94% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3256 Points ∼69% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro	2996 Points ∼63% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	4734 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=14)	4370 Points ∼92% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=333)	1075 Points ∼23% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	2720 Points ∼79%
Honor 10	2773 Points ∼80% +2%
OnePlus 6	3452 Points ∼100% +27%
Nokia 7 Plus	2734 Points ∼79% +1%
LG G7 ThinQ	3150 Points ∼91% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	2496 Points ∼72% -8%
Huawei P20 Pro	2885 Points ∼84% +6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	2541 Points ∼74% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3642, n=14)	3001 Points ∼87% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=356)	1484 Points ∼43% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	8261 Points ∼100%
Honor 10	3573 Points ∼43% -57%
OnePlus 6	8252 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus	1895 Points ∼23% -77%
LG G7 ThinQ	7633 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	4637 Points ∼56% -44%
Huawei P20 Pro	3335 Points ∼40% -60%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	8219 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=14)	7753 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (104 - 8312, n=356)	1527 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	5687 Points ∼90%
Honor 10	3358 Points ∼53% -41%
OnePlus 6	6304 Points ∼100% +11%
Nokia 7 Plus	2035 Points ∼32% -64%
LG G7 ThinQ	5799 Points ∼92% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	3895 Points ∼62% -32%
Huawei P20 Pro	3223 Points ∼51% -43%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	5492 Points ∼87% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6378, n=14)	5712 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (127 - 6378, n=364)	1304 Points ∼21% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	34928 Points ∼95%
Honor 10	21070 Points ∼57% -40%
OnePlus 6	34191 Points ∼93% -2%
Nokia 7 Plus	20085 Points ∼55% -42%
LG G7 ThinQ	27817 Points ∼76% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	26226 Points ∼71% -25%
Huawei P20 Pro	22441 Points ∼61% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	36762 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (27817 - 36762, n=14)	33715 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7095 - 36762, n=511)	12516 Points ∼34% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	82125 Points ∼100%
Honor 10	32674 Points ∼40% -60%
OnePlus 6	81269 Points ∼99% -1%
Nokia 7 Plus	29333 Points ∼36% -64%
LG G7 ThinQ	80534 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	46610 Points ∼57% -43%
Huawei P20 Pro	33472 Points ∼41% -59%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	81502 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 84681, n=14)	80769 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 160199, n=511)	16923 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	63159 Points ∼98%
Honor 10	29111 Points ∼45% -54%
OnePlus 6	62241 Points ∼97% -1%
Nokia 7 Plus	26610 Points ∼41% -58%
LG G7 ThinQ	56669 Points ∼88% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	39745 Points ∼62% -37%
Huawei P20 Pro	30176 Points ∼47% -52%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	64152 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56669 - 64592, n=14)	61576 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=512)	14348 Points ∼22% -77%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	150 fps ∼100%
Honor 10	124 fps ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 6	150 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus	50 fps ∼33% -67%
LG G7 ThinQ	144 fps ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	147 fps ∼98% -2%
Huawei P20 Pro	121 fps ∼81% -19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	150 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 151, n=15)	143 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=537)	29.5 fps ∼20% -80%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	60 fps ∼100%
Honor 10	59 fps ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 6	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus	48 fps ∼80% -20%
LG G7 ThinQ	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 60, n=14)	59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=540)	24.2 fps ∼40% -60%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	71 fps ∼96%
Honor 10	59 fps ∼80% -17%
OnePlus 6	66 fps ∼89% -7%
Nokia 7 Plus	23 fps ∼31% -68%
LG G7 ThinQ	63 fps ∼85% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	74 fps ∼100% +4%
Huawei P20 Pro	61 fps ∼82% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	71 fps ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=14)	73.9 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 115, n=459)	15.8 fps ∼21% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	58 fps ∼100%
Honor 10	50 fps ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 6	58 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus	22 fps ∼38% -62%
LG G7 ThinQ	41 fps ∼71% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	45 fps ∼78% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro	54 fps ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	58 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 59, n=14)	54.9 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=462)	15.3 fps ∼26% -74%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	35 fps ∼60%
Honor 10	39 fps ∼67% +11%
OnePlus 6	56 fps ∼97% +60%
Nokia 7 Plus	14 fps ∼24% -60%
LG G7 ThinQ	51 fps ∼88% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	47 fps ∼81% +34%
Huawei P20 Pro	39 fps ∼67% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	58 fps ∼100% +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 60.9, n=15)	53.9 fps ∼93% +54%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 69.3, n=324)	13.4 fps ∼23% -62%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	54 fps ∼96%
Honor 10	34 fps ∼61% -37%
OnePlus 6	54 fps ∼96% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus	15 fps ∼27% -72%
LG G7 ThinQ	26 fps ∼46% -52%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	24 fps ∼43% -56%
Huawei P20 Pro	36 fps ∼64% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	56 fps ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (26 - 59, n=14)	49 fps ∼88% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=326)	13.3 fps ∼24% -75%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	35 fps ∼100%
Honor 10	23 fps ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 6	35 fps ∼100% 0%
Nokia 7 Plus	8.3 fps ∼24% -76%
LG G7 ThinQ	33 fps ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	28 fps ∼80% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro	23 fps ∼66% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	35 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=14)	34.1 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 40, n=254)	9.31 fps ∼27% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Pocophone F1	33 fps ∼89%
Honor 10	20 fps ∼54% -39%
OnePlus 6	32 fps ∼86% -3%
Nokia 7 Plus	9.1 fps ∼25% -72%
LG G7 ThinQ	17 fps ∼46% -48%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	14 fps ∼38% -58%
Huawei P20 Pro	22 fps ∼59% -33%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	37 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=14)	29.9 fps ∼81% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 50, n=257)	8.44 fps ∼23% -74%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus	15.07 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	35.83 fps ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro	25.93 fps ∼72%
Average of class Smartphone (1.06 - 38.7, n=72)	12.1 fps ∼34%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6	1169 Points ∼79%
Nokia 7 Plus	349 Points ∼24%
LG G7 ThinQ	1176 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	1481 Points ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro	887 Points ∼60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1176, n=4)	1174 Points ∼79%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2606, n=70)	679 Points ∼46%

Legende

Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Honor 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash

LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)	88.081 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)	87.695 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	75.959 Points ∼86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 89.5, n=15)	72.7 Points ∼83% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	71.172 Points ∼81% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	69.59 Points ∼79% -8%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	58.255 Points ∼66% -23%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	56.506 Points ∼64% -26%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	53.89 Points ∼61% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=394)	35.4 Points ∼40% -53%

Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)	17026 Points ∼100% +17%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)	16720 Points ∼98% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	14760 Points ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 17131, n=15)	14744 Points ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	14514 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	13360 Points ∼78% -8%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	11584 Points ∼68% -20%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	10965 Points ∼64% -24%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	10945 Points ∼64% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=530)	5305 Points ∼31% -63%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=549)	11710 ms * ∼100% -332%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	3937.3 ms * ∼34% -45%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	3899 ms * ∼33% -44%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	3852.2 ms * ∼33% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	3179 ms * ∼27% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2264 - 11204, n=15)	3122 ms * ∼27% -15%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	2713.6 ms * ∼23%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)	2484.1 ms * ∼21% +8%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)	2445 ms * ∼21% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	2059.7 ms * ∼18% +24%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)	252 Points ∼100% +13%
LG G7 ThinQ (Chrome 66)	252 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=14)	237 Points ∼94% +6%
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (Chrome 68)	223 Points ∼88%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)	211 Points ∼84% -5%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)	182 Points ∼72% -18%
Honor 10 (Chrome 66)	182 Points ∼72% -18%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	168 Points ∼67% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)	164 Points ∼65% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=263)	105 Points ∼42% -53%

* ... kleiner is beter

	Xiaomi Pocophone F1	Nokia 7 Plus	LG G7 ThinQ	Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus	Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium	Honor 10	OnePlus 6	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-12%	8%	17%	-7%	225%	23%	30%	-43%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	65.58 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.31 -5%	62.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4%	67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -54%			50.5 (17.1 - 71.9, n=23) -23%	44.7 (3.4 - 87.1, n=301) -32%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	82.21 -4%	84.72 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -60%			66.9 (18 - 85.3, n=23) -22%	63 (8.2 - 96.5, n=301) -26%
Random Write 4KB	17.81	19.62 10%	23.26 31%	22.74 28%	21.75 22%	163 815%	21.8 22%	46.8 (8.77 - 156, n=30) 163%	14.8 (0.14 - 164, n=580) -17%
Random Read 4KB	101.01	54.65 -46%	110.46 9%	129.68 28%	135.99 35%	145.88 44%	137 36%	134 (78.2 - 173, n=30) 33%	36.4 (1.59 - 173, n=580) -64%
Sequential Write 256KB	155.57	211.6 36%	176.45 13%	204.94 32%	170.98 10%	192.12 23%	201.4 29%	191 (133 - 214, n=30) 23%	75.8 (2.99 - 242, n=580) -51%
Sequential Read 256KB	705.38	283.12 -60%	695.15 -1%	818.69 16%	748.59 6%	827.69 17%	725.6 3%	730 (529 - 895, n=30) 3%	222 (12.1 - 895, n=580) -69%

PUBG Mobile

; Balanced; 0.8.0: Ø38.6 (11-41)

; HD; 0.8.0: Ø39.6 (18-41)

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Pocophone F1 Smartphone

Top 10 Testrapporten

Formaat Vergelijking

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Responstijd Scherm

PUBG Mobile

Arena of Valor