Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Nokia 7 Plus Smartphone

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 21-05-2018

Smartphone met Android One. Kopers van de Nokia 7 Plus zullen kunnen genieten van regelmatige software-upgrades, een pure versie van Android en up-to-date beveiligingspatches dankzij het Android One Program. Of de nieuwe mid-range smartphone met de splinternieuwe Snapdragon 660 ook indruk weet te maken op het vlak van hardware komt aan bod in dit testrapport.

Nokia 7 Plus (7 Serie)
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 512
Geheugen
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4
Beeldscherm
6 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Capacitief, Multi-Touch, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audioklink, Card Reader: microSD-kaarten tot 256 GB , 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: afstands-, bewegingssensor, E-kompas, gyroscoop, Hall-sensor, USB-C, Miracast, OTG
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GPRS / EDGE (2G): 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz; UMTS / HSPA (3G): 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz; LTE (4G): 800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz - Frequentiebanden 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 9.55 x 158.4 x 75.64
Batterij
3800 mAh Lithium-Ion, Gesprekstijd 3G (volgens fabrikant): 19 h, Standby 3G (volgens fabrikant): 720 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual-camera 12 MP (f/1.75, 1.4 µm) + 12 MP (f/2.6, 1.0 µm)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1.0 µm
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Mono-luidspreker met SMART-amp, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Beschermingscover, USB-C-oplader, oplaad-/datakabel, handleiding, SIM-kaart-tool, Android One, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR: 0.361 W/kg (head), 1.77 W/kg(body), fanless
Gewicht
186 g, Voeding: 51 g
Prijs
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Nokia 7 Plus
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼39%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.7 MBit/s ∼8% -78%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
334 MBit/s ∼53% +35%
Wiko WIM
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
351 MBit/s ∼55% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
280 MBit/s ∼44% +13%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
386 MBit/s ∼61% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
329 MBit/s ∼52% +33%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼100% +157%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼40% +4%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼47%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼9% -82%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
305 MBit/s ∼47% -1%
Wiko WIM
Adreno 506, 626, 64 GB eMMC Flash
276 MBit/s ∼42% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 32 GB eMMC Flash
269 MBit/s ∼41% -12%
OnePlus 5T
Adreno 540, SD 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 MBit/s ∼100% +112%
Samsung Galaxy S8
Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼100% +112%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼67% +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼37% -21%
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Nokia 7 Plus
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
HDR-modus
HDR-modus
HDR-modus (auto)
HDR-modus (auto)
Standaardmodus
Standaardmodus
Foto's met...
Foto's met...
...een Bokeh-effect
...een Bokeh-effect
2x zoom
2x zoom
Normal
Normal

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
485
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
448
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 485 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 463 cd/m² Minimum: 2.76 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 458 cd/m²
Contrast: 2082:1 (Zwart: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
IPS, 1920x1080, 6
Wiko WIM
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
OnePlus 5T
AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01
Samsung Galaxy S8
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Screen
-25%
-4%
-28%
7%
22%
24%
43%
Brightness middle
458
456
0%
659
44%
344
-25%
541
18%
425
-7%
566
24%
569
24%
Brightness
463
455
-2%
680
47%
353
-24%
538
16%
423
-9%
564
22%
578
25%
Brightness Distribution
92
85
-8%
88
-4%
90
-2%
96
4%
92
0%
94
2%
95
3%
Black Level *
0.22
0.56
-155%
Contrast
2082
1177
-43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4
5.6
-40%
2.8
30%
5.7
-43%
5.8
-45%
2.1
47%
2.7
32%
1.3
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.4
11.1
-50%
6.5
12%
12.2
-65%
3.4
54%
5.4
27%
2.1
72%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
6.9
-47%
3
36%
5.1
-9%
2.7
43%
2.5
47%
3.1
34%
1.6
66%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.3 96%
2.18 101%
2.73 81%
2.07 106%
2.32 95%
2.15 102%
2.31 95%
CCT
7425 88%
7883 82%
6938 94%
7407 88%
6570 99%
6455 101%
6335 103%
6401 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.87

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 50 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
29.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 14 ms stijging
↘ 15.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
43.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 20.4 ms stijging
↘ 22.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 62 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (39.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼66%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
81789 Points ∼38% -42%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
89349 Points ∼42% -37%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
116746 Points ∼54% -18%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼100% +52%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼97% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10)
137699 Points ∼64% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼67% +1%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼87%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
5558 Points ∼80% -9%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5051 Points ∼72% -17%
Wiko WIM
4660 Points ∼67% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5214 Points ∼75% -14%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼94% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5370 Points ∼77% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5789 - 6187, n=11)
6012 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼81% -7%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼84%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
7846 Points ∼97% +15%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5083 Points ∼63% -26%
Wiko WIM
5621 Points ∼69% -18%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5916 Points ∼73% -13%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼95% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6035 Points ∼74% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6274 - 7026, n=10)
6654 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼76% -9%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼83%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
828 Points ∼62% -25%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
912 Points ∼69% -17%
Wiko WIM
933 Points ∼70% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1195 Points ∼90% +9%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1156 Points ∼87% +5%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼96% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1027 - 1146, n=10)
1092 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=687)
792 Points ∼60% -28%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼38%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1026 Points ∼17% -55%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1492 Points ∼24% -35%
Wiko WIM
965 Points ∼16% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1331 Points ∼22% -42%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼100% +165%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6096 Points ∼100% +165%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼61% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1970 - 2332, n=10)
2257 Points ∼37% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=687)
2309 Points ∼38% 0%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼62%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1108 Points ∼27% -56%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1325 Points ∼33% -47%
Wiko WIM
1007 Points ∼25% -60%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
2275 Points ∼56% -9%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼95% +54%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3039 Points ∼75% +21%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1737 - 2799, n=10)
2360 Points ∼58% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7945, n=687)
1707 Points ∼42% -32%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼83%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3261 Points ∼55% -34%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3287 Points ∼55% -34%
Wiko WIM
3549 Points ∼59% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4358 Points ∼73% -12%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼98% +18%
Samsung Galaxy S8
5386 Points ∼90% +8%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼100% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3745 - 5282, n=10)
4957 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=687)
3252 Points ∼55% -35%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼64%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
1323 Points ∼36% -44%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1560 Points ∼42% -34%
Wiko WIM
1339 Points ∼36% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1993 Points ∼54% -16%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3277 Points ∼89% +38%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼89% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1905 - 2428, n=11)
2314 Points ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=687)
1644 Points ∼45% -31%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼87%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
4320 Points ∼64% -26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
4234 Points ∼63% -28%
Wiko WIM
4562 Points ∼68% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
4431 Points ∼66% -24%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼99% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S8
6711 Points ∼99% +14%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4895 - 5913, n=11)
5694 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 13279, n=408)
4874 Points ∼72% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼82%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
875 Points ∼44% -47%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
865 Points ∼43% -47%
Wiko WIM
939 Points ∼47% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1526 Points ∼76% -7%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼98% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S8
1997 Points ∼100% +21%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼96% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1431 - 1646, n=11)
1598 Points ∼80% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=408)
1483 Points ∼74% -10%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼90%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
2177 Points ∼71% -21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1706 Points ∼56% -38%
Wiko WIM
2106 Points ∼69% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1950 Points ∼64% -29%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2494 Points ∼81% -9%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼95% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1883 - 2759, n=11)
2579 Points ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼65% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼29%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
381 Points ∼9% -67%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
727 Points ∼18% -37%
Wiko WIM
381 Points ∼9% -67%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
618 Points ∼15% -47%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼100% +246%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3472 Points ∼86% +199%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼75% +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1061 - 1201, n=11)
1174 Points ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼41% +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼35%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
467 Points ∼12% -65%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
833 Points ∼22% -37%
Wiko WIM
466 Points ∼12% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
729 Points ∼19% -45%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼100% +182%
Samsung Galaxy S8
3194 Points ∼85% +140%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼80% +125%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1175 - 1372, n=12)
1339 Points ∼36% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼42% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼90%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
2157 Points ∼71% -21%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1698 Points ∼56% -38%
Wiko WIM
2140 Points ∼71% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1946 Points ∼64% -29%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼100% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S8
2440 Points ∼81% -11%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼95% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2383 - 2834, n=11)
2693 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼62% -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼33%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
743 Points ∼13% -61%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1256 Points ∼22% -34%
Wiko WIM
742 Points ∼13% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
879 Points ∼15% -54%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼100% +206%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4923 Points ∼85% +160%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼58% +76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1711 - 1938, n=11)
1893 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼37% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼42%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
870 Points ∼18% -57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
1333 Points ∼28% -34%
Wiko WIM
868 Points ∼18% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
1001 Points ∼21% -51%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼100% +137%
Samsung Galaxy S8
4015 Points ∼83% +97%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼67% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1825 - 2073, n=11)
2026 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼38% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼90%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
16146 Points ∼72% -20%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
13054 Points ∼58% -35%
Wiko WIM
16939 Points ∼75% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
13306 Points ∼59% -34%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼95% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S8
21543 Points ∼96% +7%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼100% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (15088 - 21016, n=11)
19242 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 57583, n=739)
14942 Points ∼67% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼50%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
13491 Points ∼23% -54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
18528 Points ∼32% -37%
Wiko WIM
13241 Points ∼23% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15262 Points ∼26% -48%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼100% +98%
Samsung Galaxy S8
36347 Points ∼63% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼58% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (25561 - 29496, n=11)
28596 Points ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209431, n=737)
24413 Points ∼42% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼63%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
14003 Points ∼33% -47%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
16949 Points ∼40% -36%
Wiko WIM
14074 Points ∼33% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
14779 Points ∼35% -44%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼100% +58%
Samsung Galaxy S8
31532 Points ∼75% +18%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼72% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (22145 - 26731, n=11)
25782 Points ∼61% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 110468, n=737)
19480 Points ∼46% -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼41%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
23 fps ∼19% -54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
29 fps ∼24% -42%
Wiko WIM
23 fps ∼19% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
34 fps ∼28% -32%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼93% +126%
Samsung Galaxy S8
121 fps ∼100% +142%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼100% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=11)
48.4 fps ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=751)
42.1 fps ∼35% -16%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼80%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
22 fps ∼37% -54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
31 fps ∼52% -35%
Wiko WIM
23 fps ∼38% -52%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
31 fps ∼52% -35%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼100% +25%
Samsung Galaxy S8
60 fps ∼100% +25%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (42 - 52, n=11)
47.6 fps ∼79% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=760)
29.8 fps ∼50% -38%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼37%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
9.9 fps ∼16% -57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
14 fps ∼23% -39%
Wiko WIM
10 fps ∼16% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
16 fps ∼26% -30%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼97% +161%
Samsung Galaxy S8
62 fps ∼100% +170%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼98% +165%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (20 - 23, n=11)
22.4 fps ∼36% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=656)
24.6 fps ∼40% +7%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼41%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
9.5 fps ∼18% -57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
15 fps ∼28% -32%
Wiko WIM
10 fps ∼19% -55%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
15 fps ∼28% -32%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼98% +141%
Samsung Galaxy S8
41 fps ∼76% +86%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼100% +145%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19 - 23, n=11)
21.3 fps ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=664)
21.1 fps ∼39% -4%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼34%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
6.4 fps ∼16% -54%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5.2 fps ∼13% -63%
Wiko WIM
6.4 fps ∼16% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.9 fps ∼24% -29%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼100% +193%
Samsung Galaxy S8
24 fps ∼59% +71%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼95% +179%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (13 - 15, n=11)
14.5 fps ∼35% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=519)
19.9 fps ∼49% +42%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼41%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
6.5 fps ∼18% -57%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
11 fps ∼30% -27%
Wiko WIM
6.4 fps ∼17% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
9.6 fps ∼26% -36%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼100% +147%
Samsung Galaxy S8
23 fps ∼62% +53%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼97% +140%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 15, n=12)
13.7 fps ∼37% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=521)
18.3 fps ∼49% +22%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼33%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3.5 fps ∼14% -58%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
5.5 fps ∼22% -34%
Wiko WIM
3.8 fps ∼15% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
6 fps ∼24% -28%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼100% +201%
Samsung Galaxy S8
25 fps ∼100% +201%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼92% +177%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.1 - 9.1, n=11)
8.89 fps ∼36% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=444)
13.5 fps ∼54% +63%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼40%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3.5 fps ∼15% -62%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
6 fps ∼26% -34%
Wiko WIM
3.5 fps ∼15% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
5.8 fps ∼25% -36%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼100% +153%
Samsung Galaxy S8
13 fps ∼57% +43%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼96% +142%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 9.8, n=12)
8.55 fps ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=448)
12 fps ∼52% +32%

Legende

 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko WIM Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼100% +23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
65.846 Points ∼99% +22%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼88% +8%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=10)
52.4 Points ∼79% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
49.07 Points ∼74% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=582)
45.1 Points ∼68% -16%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
28.107 Points ∼42% -48%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
27.556 Points ∼41% -49%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
26.965 Points ∼41% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
12941 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼97% +14%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼90% +6%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=11)
10080 Points ∼78% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
9350 Points ∼72% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=745)
7422 Points ∼57% -32%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
5052 Points ∼39% -54%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
4786 Points ∼37% -56%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
4625 Points ∼36% -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=770)
10102 ms * ∼100% -157%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
9823.3 ms * ∼97% -149%
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL (Chrome 64)
9564.3 ms * ∼95% -143%
Wiko WIM (Chrome Version 59)
8781.2 ms * ∼87% -123%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
4275.2 ms * ∼42% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=10)
4057 ms * ∼40% -3%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼39%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼38% +2%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼31% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
1886.6 ms * ∼19% +52%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
194 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼94% +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼93% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)
171 Points ∼88% +2%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137)
156 Points ∼80% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=343)
124 Points ∼64% -26%
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra (Chrome 65)
110 Points ∼57% -35%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼100% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=214)
68.8 Points ∼100% +9%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
63 Points ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (58 - 63, n=6)
60.7 Points ∼88% -4%

* ... kleiner is beter

Nokia 7 PlusAsus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KLSony Xperia XA2 UltraWiko WIMSamsung Galaxy A8 2018OnePlus 5TSamsung Galaxy S8Huawei P20 ProAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-16%
-7%
-17%
-4%
75%
41%
267%
1%
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.31
72.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
16%
63.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
61.4
-1%
62.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
53.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-14%
57.5 (11.2 - 74.7, n=117)
-8%
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
-19%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.21
83.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
85.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
83.8
2%
77.92 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
63.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-22%
76.5 (21.1 - 87.2, n=117)
-7%
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
19.62
12
-39%
10.1
-49%
13.34
-32%
14.69
-25%
20
2%
15.25
-22%
160.49
718%
27 (3.4 - 133, n=134)
38%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
50%
Random Read 4KB
54.65
36.8
-33%
76
39%
38.1
-30%
82.62
51%
138.1
153%
127.17
133%
144.33
164%
56 (11.4 - 149, n=134)
2%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-1%
Sequential Write 256KB
211.6
139.5
-34%
138.8
-34%
136.67
-35%
104.2
-51%
203.4
-4%
193.23
-9%
196.69
-7%
174 (40 - 254, n=134)
-18%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
-47%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.12
269.3
-5%
273.7
-3%
272.08
-4%
299.94
6%
698.7
147%
792.86
180%
831.82
194%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=134)
-4%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
10%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InstellingenWaarde
 high29 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InstellingenWaarde
 high30 fps
World of Tanks Blitz
 InstellingenWaarde
 high, 0xAA, 0xAF30 fps
Max. Belasting
 39.6 °C39.2 °C35.6 °C 
 38.3 °C37.1 °C38.2 °C 
 36.9 °C37 °C35.4 °C 
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.5 °C
34.4 °C37.3 °C38.7 °C
35.6 °C36.3 °C38.3 °C
35.5 °C37 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 38.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.7 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  29.8 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.244.42532.941.73137.232.54031.737.35039.641.86328.335.88027.335.910026.934.112526.7361602439.920020.944.825020.952.231519.550.140018.554.150017.564.863017.561.880015.769.2100015.873.8125016.675.1160015.874.1200015.474.1250015.574.731501675.9400015.87450001672.2630016.374.3800016.371.91000016.268.21250016.456.41600016.452.1SPL28.685.3N1.161.3median 16.4median 68.2Delta2.111.935.245.132.940.337.238.231.741.739.642.728.327.327.32926.92726.730.32437.620.942.820.951.919.555.518.560.717.564.617.567.915.769.515.872.316.670.115.872.215.470.815.573.11674.615.876.81670.216.373.716.376.616.273.716.465.716.454.328.6851.162.6median 16.4median 69.52.110.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 7 PlusSamsung Galaxy A8 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 7 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A8 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.13 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.76 / 1.78 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.47 / 9.13 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3580 mAh
Wiko WIM
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
36%
-6%
21%
25%
16%
21%
23%
-9%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.58
11%
0.77
-18%
0.93
-43%
0.67
-3%
0.58
11%
0.78
-20%
0.84
-29%
0.741 (0.56 - 1.2, n=11)
-14%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
-36%
Idle Average *
1.76
1.31
26%
2.12
-20%
1.28
27%
1.02
42%
1.44
18%
1.1
37%
1.54
12%
1.941 (1.4 - 2.32, n=11)
-10%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
1%
Idle Maximum *
1.78
1.33
25%
2.17
-22%
1.37
23%
1.1
38%
1.53
14%
1.16
35%
1.57
12%
2.22 (1.54 - 4.1, n=11)
-25%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
-14%
Load Average *
4.47
1.88
58%
4.3
4%
2.39
47%
3.86
14%
3.17
29%
4.15
7%
2.47
45%
4.59 (3.47 - 8.2, n=11)
-3%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
9%
Load Maximum *
9.13
3.8
58%
6.73
26%
4.25
53%
5.97
35%
8.54
6%
5.12
44%
2.49
73%
8.27 (5.93 - 12.2, n=11)
9%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
34%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
28h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 46min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 38min
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
Asus ZenFone 4 Selfie Pro ZD552KL
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra
3580 mAh
Wiko WIM
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A8 2018
3000 mAh
OnePlus 5T
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S8
3000 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Batterijduur
-3%
27%
-27%
20%
22%
20%
35%
Reader / Idle
1703
1788
5%
1546
-9%
1754
3%
1667
-2%
1727
1%
H.264
706
876
24%
908
29%
799
13%
771
9%
784
11%
WiFi v1.3
672
654
-3%
849
26%
492
-27%
646
-4%
718
7%
719
7%
744
11%
Load
158
238
51%
260
65%
257
63%
264
67%
345
118%

Pro

+ bouwkwaliteit
+ scherm
+ Android One
+ prestaties
+ batterijduur

Contra

- luidspreker
- ergonomie
- eMMC-geheugen
- alleen LTE Cat. 6
Onder de loep: Nokia 7 Plus. Testtoestel voorzien door: HMD Global Germany.
Onder de loep: Nokia 7 Plus. Testtoestel voorzien door: HMD Global Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Met de Nokia 7 Plus biedt de Finse fabrikant HMD Global een erg interessant toestel in de prijsklasse van 360-400 euro (op het moment van schrijven). Vooral aangezien de smartphone deel uitmaakt van het Android One Program en daarom gegarandeerd beveiligings- en software-updates krijgt voor een lange tijd in de toekomst.

De Nokia 7 Plus ziet er goed uit en voelt ook zo aan. Toch vonden we de materiaalkeuze aan de achterkant van het toestel niet 100% indrukwekkend. De zijkanten van de smartphone zijn daarnaast ook wat hoekig en zorgen ervoor dat hij ietwat ongemakkelijk in de hand ligt.

Het scherm, de camera en de SoC zijn best competitief voor een toestel van 400 euro. Als je echter bereid bent om ongeveer 50/100 euro meer uit te geven, kan je reeds een Samsung Galaxy S8 krijgen, die een veel beter scherm en een snellere SoC heeft. De batterijduur is uitstekend, maar hier en daar blijft er toch ruimte voor verbetering.

Rekening houdend met de waarschijnlijkheid dat de prijs na de lancering nog wat zal zakken, biedt de Nokia 7 Plus een interessante mix van hard- en software. Potentiële kopers die op zoek zijn naar een mid-range smartphone doen er goed aan de Nokia 7 Plus eens van dichterbij te bekijken.

Nokia 7 Plus - 04-11-2019 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
88%
Toetsenbord
69 / 75 → 92%
Aanwijsapparaat
93%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
49 / 70 → 70%
Gewicht
89%
Batterij
89%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
16 / 64 → 24%
Applicatie-performance
55 / 86 → 64%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 85%
Camera
54%
Gemiddelde
74%
79%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Nokia 7 Plus Smartphone
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-05-21 (Update: 2018-05-21)