Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 6X (Mi A2) Smartphone

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Tanja Hinum (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 16-07-2018

Waarom veel uitgeven wanneer je niet moet? De Mi 6X (Mi A2), de nieuwe mid-range smartphone van Xiaomi, biedt alles waar een smartphonegebruiker van kan dromen – en dit alles voor minder dan 250 euro ($293). Kom in dit testrapport te weten hoe de Xiaomi Mi 6X (Mi A2) zich verhoudt tot de concurrentie.

Xiaomi Mi 6X (Mi 6 Serie)
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 512
Geheugen
6144 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.99 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Multitouch, capacitive, LCD IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, eMMC 5.1, 50.3 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Verbindingen: USB-Type-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: afstandssensor, gyroscoop, accelerometer, e-kompas, Hall-sensor, OTG, Miracast, Status LED
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, network standard 4G, FDD LTE: Band 1/3/5/7/8; network standard 3G, WCDMA: 850/900/1900/2100 MHz; network standard 2G, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.3 x 158.6 x 75.4
Batterij
3010 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12+20 MP, 12MP, SONY IMX486, 1.25 µm Pixel, f/1,75; 20MP, SONY IMX376, 2 µm Pixel, f/1,75
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/1.75, SONY IMX376, 2 µm Pixel
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Mono, Toetsenbord: Onscreen, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB-kabel, CHN-oplader+ (EU-stekker), MiUI, 12 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
168 g, Voeding: 35 g
Prijs
230 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 MBit/s ∼100% +135%
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s ∼58% +37%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s ∼47% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1368, n=534)
256 MBit/s ∼44% +4%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
247 MBit/s ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
246 MBit/s ∼42%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s ∼39% -9%
Sony Xperia XA1
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼19% -56%
TP-Link Neffos N1
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 64 GB eMMC Flash
101 MBit/s ∼17% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼100% +72%
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
336 MBit/s ∼59% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s ∼58%
Nokia 7 Plus
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
307 MBit/s ∼54% -8%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s ∼48% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=534)
242 MBit/s ∼42% -27%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 MBit/s ∼32% -45%
Sony Xperia XA1
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼20% -66%
TP-Link Neffos N1
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼18% -69%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Xiaomi Mi 6X
GPS Xiaomi Mi 6X
GPS Xiaomi Mi 6X
GPS Xiaomi Mi 6X
GPS Xiaomi Mi 6X
GPS Xiaomi Mi 6X
Normale modus
Normale modus
HDR-modus
HDR-modus
Bokeh-effect
Bokeh-effect

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
418
cd/m²
451
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 461 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 441.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.28 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 459 cd/m²
Contrast: 977:1 (Zwart: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Mi 6X
LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
TP-Link Neffos N1
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Sony Xperia XA1
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Nokia 7 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2
Motorola Moto X4
LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Screen
23%
12%
-3%
34%
18%
9%
29%
Brightness middle
459
580
26%
634
38%
522
14%
458
0%
545
19%
469
2%
395
-14%
Brightness
441
560
27%
635
44%
499
13%
463
5%
526
19%
479
9%
402
-9%
Brightness Distribution
91
94
3%
96
5%
92
1%
92
1%
87
-4%
86
-5%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.47
0.3
36%
0.49
-4%
0.74
-57%
0.22
53%
0.42
11%
0.37
21%
0.37
21%
Contrast
977
1933
98%
1294
32%
705
-28%
2082
113%
1298
33%
1268
30%
1068
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.8
5.6
3%
5.9
-2%
4.2
28%
4
31%
4.9
16%
5.5
5%
1.6
72%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.7
11.2
-5%
11.6
-8%
11.5
-7%
7.4
31%
8.5
21%
10.7
-0%
3.4
68%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.3
7.4
-1%
7.8
-7%
6.4
12%
4.7
36%
5.4
26%
6.7
8%
1.1
85%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.22 99%
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
2.19 100%
2.31 95%
2.1 105%
2.14 103%
CCT
7984 81%
8584 76%
8464 77%
7044 92%
7425 88%
7610 85%
8064 81%
6536 99%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 1174 Hz ≤ 21 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 1174 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 21 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 1174 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 50 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
29.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 14.8 ms stijging
↘ 14.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 71 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
50.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 23.6 ms stijging
↘ 26.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (39.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
110680 Points ∼50%
TP-Link Neffos N1
66472 Points ∼30% -40%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
46651 Points ∼21% -58%
Sony Xperia XA1
59082 Points ∼27% -47%
Nokia 7 Plus
117165 Points ∼53% +6%
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points ∼33% -33%
Motorola Moto X4
70445 Points ∼32% -36%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼100% +101%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (105973 - 120479, n=11)
116194 Points ∼52% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=490)
87858 Points ∼40% -21%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
140714 Points ∼55%
TP-Link Neffos N1
57974 Points ∼23% -59%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
58282 Points ∼23% -59%
Nokia 7 Plus
141701 Points ∼55% +1%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼100% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10)
137699 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼56% +2%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5995 Points ∼70%
TP-Link Neffos N1
4634 Points ∼54% -23%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3623 Points ∼42% -40%
Sony Xperia XA1
Points ∼0% -100%
Nokia 7 Plus
6077 Points ∼71% +1%
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points ∼56% -19%
Motorola Moto X4
4887 Points ∼57% -18%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5789 - 6187, n=11)
6012 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 11690, n=463)
5673 Points ∼66% -5%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
6723 Points ∼66%
TP-Link Neffos N1
5893 Points ∼57% -12%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
4709 Points ∼46% -30%
Sony Xperia XA1
4759 Points ∼46% -29%
Nokia 7 Plus
6825 Points ∼66% +2%
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points ∼57% -13%
Motorola Moto X4
5919 Points ∼58% -12%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼100% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6274 - 7026, n=10)
6654 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 15193, n=624)
6193 Points ∼60% -8%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1108 Points ∼77%
TP-Link Neffos N1
749 Points ∼52% -32%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Sony Xperia XA1
847 Points ∼59% -24%
Nokia 7 Plus
1101 Points ∼77% -1%
HTC U11 Life
858 Points ∼60% -23%
Motorola Moto X4
795 Points ∼55% -28%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼100% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1027 - 1146, n=10)
1092 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=687)
792 Points ∼55% -29%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2295 Points ∼29%
TP-Link Neffos N1
1117 Points ∼14% -51%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
788 Points ∼10% -66%
Sony Xperia XA1
1016 Points ∼13% -56%
Nokia 7 Plus
2298 Points ∼29% 0%
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points ∼19% -34%
Motorola Moto X4
1519 Points ∼19% -34%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼100% +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1970 - 2332, n=10)
2257 Points ∼28% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=687)
2309 Points ∼29% +1%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2470 Points ∼68%
TP-Link Neffos N1
1467 Points ∼40% -41%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
778 Points ∼21% -69%
Sony Xperia XA1
1063 Points ∼29% -57%
Nokia 7 Plus
2503 Points ∼69% +1%
HTC U11 Life
838 Points ∼23% -66%
Motorola Moto X4
1405 Points ∼39% -43%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1737 - 2799, n=10)
2360 Points ∼65% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 7945, n=687)
1707 Points ∼47% -31%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
4797 Points ∼61%
TP-Link Neffos N1
3063 Points ∼39% -36%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1805 Points ∼23% -62%
Sony Xperia XA1
2969 Points ∼38% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
4976 Points ∼63% +4%
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points ∼41% -33%
Motorola Moto X4
3279 Points ∼42% -32%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3745 - 5282, n=10)
4957 Points ∼63% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=687)
3252 Points ∼41% -32%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2343 Points ∼55%
TP-Link Neffos N1
1393 Points ∼33% -41%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
323 Points ∼8% -86%
Sony Xperia XA1
1284 Points ∼30% -45%
Nokia 7 Plus
2369 Points ∼56% +1%
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points ∼32% -42%
Motorola Moto X4
1536 Points ∼36% -34%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼100% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1905 - 2428, n=11)
2314 Points ∼54% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6097, n=687)
1644 Points ∼39% -30%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5486 Points ∼44%
TP-Link Neffos N1
2576 Points ∼21% -53%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2190 Points ∼18% -60%
Sony Xperia XA1
2747 Points ∼22% -50%
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points ∼32% -28%
Motorola Moto X4
3894 Points ∼31% -29%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼100% +128%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4983 - 5811, n=9)
5524 Points ∼44% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=346)
4786 Points ∼38% -13%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
5843 Points ∼66%
TP-Link Neffos N1
3539 Points ∼40% -39%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2601 Points ∼30% -55%
Sony Xperia XA1
3621 Points ∼41% -38%
Nokia 7 Plus
5867 Points ∼67% 0%
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points ∼48% -28%
Motorola Moto X4
4115 Points ∼47% -30%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4895 - 5913, n=11)
5694 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 13279, n=408)
4874 Points ∼55% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1620 Points ∼67%
TP-Link Neffos N1
839 Points ∼35% -48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
681 Points ∼28% -58%
Sony Xperia XA1
828 Points ∼34% -49%
Nokia 7 Plus
1646 Points ∼68% +2%
HTC U11 Life
877 Points ∼36% -46%
Motorola Moto X4
870 Points ∼36% -46%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1431 - 1646, n=11)
1598 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4824, n=408)
1483 Points ∼61% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2757 Points ∼86%
TP-Link Neffos N1
1246 Points ∼39% -55%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1134 Points ∼35% -59%
Sony Xperia XA1
1804 Points ∼56% -35%
Nokia 7 Plus
2749 Points ∼86% 0%
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points ∼56% -35%
Motorola Moto X4
1811 Points ∼57% -34%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1883 - 2759, n=11)
2579 Points ∼81% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 4987, n=549)
2003 Points ∼63% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1164 Points ∼33%
TP-Link Neffos N1
624 Points ∼18% -46%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
262 Points ∼8% -77%
Sony Xperia XA1
574 Points ∼16% -51%
Nokia 7 Plus
1161 Points ∼33% 0%
HTC U11 Life
729 Points ∼21% -37%
Motorola Moto X4
724 Points ∼21% -38%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼100% +200%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1061 - 1201, n=11)
1174 Points ∼34% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 8469, n=549)
1646 Points ∼47% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1335 Points ∼39%
TP-Link Neffos N1
702 Points ∼21% -47%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
316 Points ∼9% -76%
Sony Xperia XA1
677 Points ∼20% -49%
Nokia 7 Plus
1332 Points ∼39% 0%
HTC U11 Life
839 Points ∼25% -37%
Motorola Moto X4
835 Points ∼24% -37%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼100% +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1175 - 1372, n=12)
1339 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 7190, n=550)
1575 Points ∼46% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2680 Points ∼97%
TP-Link Neffos N1
1469 Points ∼53% -45%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
1103 Points ∼40% -59%
Sony Xperia XA1
1892 Points ∼68% -29%
Nokia 7 Plus
2734 Points ∼99% +2%
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points ∼62% -36%
Motorola Moto X4
1816 Points ∼65% -32%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2383 - 2834, n=11)
2693 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5054, n=591)
1870 Points ∼67% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
1891 Points ∼34%
TP-Link Neffos N1
832 Points ∼15% -56%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
527 Points ∼9% -72%
Sony Xperia XA1
827 Points ∼15% -56%
Nokia 7 Plus
1895 Points ∼34% 0%
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points ∼22% -34%
Motorola Moto X4
1259 Points ∼22% -33%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼100% +198%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1711 - 1938, n=11)
1893 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 12394, n=590)
2146 Points ∼38% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
2023 Points ∼44%
TP-Link Neffos N1
921 Points ∼20% -54%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
596 Points ∼13% -71%
Sony Xperia XA1
945 Points ∼21% -53%
Nokia 7 Plus
2035 Points ∼44% +1%
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points ∼29% -34%
Motorola Moto X4
1351 Points ∼29% -33%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼100% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1825 - 2073, n=11)
2026 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 9123, n=593)
1854 Points ∼40% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21016 Points ∼62%
TP-Link Neffos N1
13959 Points ∼41% -34%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
8990 Points ∼27% -57%
Sony Xperia XA1
16394 Points ∼48% -22%
Nokia 7 Plus
20085 Points ∼59% -4%
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points ∼38% -39%
Motorola Moto X4
12870 Points ∼38% -39%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼100% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (15088 - 21016, n=11)
19242 Points ∼57% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 57583, n=739)
14942 Points ∼44% -29%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
28984 Points ∼35%
TP-Link Neffos N1
13879 Points ∼17% -52%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
10262 Points ∼13% -65%
Sony Xperia XA1
13125 Points ∼16% -55%
Nokia 7 Plus
29333 Points ∼36% +1%
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points ∼23% -36%
Motorola Moto X4
18355 Points ∼22% -37%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼100% +182%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (25561 - 29496, n=11)
28596 Points ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209431, n=737)
24413 Points ∼30% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
26731 Points ∼43%
TP-Link Neffos N1
13897 Points ∼22% -48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
9949 Points ∼16% -63%
Sony Xperia XA1
13734 Points ∼22% -49%
Nokia 7 Plus
26610 Points ∼43% 0%
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points ∼27% -37%
Motorola Moto X4
16767 Points ∼27% -37%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼100% +133%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (22145 - 26731, n=11)
25782 Points ∼41% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 110468, n=737)
19480 Points ∼31% -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
50 fps ∼51%
TP-Link Neffos N1
24 fps ∼24% -52%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
18 fps ∼18% -64%
Sony Xperia XA1
22 fps ∼22% -56%
Nokia 7 Plus
50 fps ∼51% 0%
HTC U11 Life
30 fps ∼31% -40%
Motorola Moto X4
30 fps ∼31% -40%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼100% +96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=11)
48.4 fps ∼49% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=751)
42.1 fps ∼43% -16%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
48 fps ∼81%
TP-Link Neffos N1
22 fps ∼37% -54%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
14 fps ∼24% -71%
Sony Xperia XA1
33 fps ∼56% -31%
Nokia 7 Plus
48 fps ∼81% 0%
HTC U11 Life
29 fps ∼49% -40%
Motorola Moto X4
31 fps ∼53% -35%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (42 - 52, n=11)
47.6 fps ∼81% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 120, n=760)
29.8 fps ∼51% -38%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
23 fps ∼32%
TP-Link Neffos N1
11 fps ∼15% -52%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
7.6 fps ∼11% -67%
Sony Xperia XA1
9.6 fps ∼13% -58%
Nokia 7 Plus
23 fps ∼32% 0%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼19% -39%
Motorola Moto X4
14 fps ∼19% -39%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼100% +213%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (20 - 23, n=11)
22.4 fps ∼31% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=656)
24.6 fps ∼34% +7%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
21 fps ∼60%
TP-Link Neffos N1
11 fps ∼31% -48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
7.5 fps ∼21% -64%
Sony Xperia XA1
19 fps ∼54% -10%
Nokia 7 Plus
22 fps ∼63% +5%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps ∼40% -33%
Motorola Moto X4
15 fps ∼43% -29%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼100% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19 - 23, n=11)
21.3 fps ∼61% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=664)
21.1 fps ∼60% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
15 fps ∼38%
TP-Link Neffos N1
6.8 fps ∼17% -55%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.4 fps ∼6% -84%
Sony Xperia XA1
3.4 fps ∼9% -77%
Nokia 7 Plus
14 fps ∼36% -7%
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps ∼25% -35%
Motorola Moto X4
9.6 fps ∼25% -36%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼100% +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (13 - 15, n=11)
14.5 fps ∼37% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=519)
19.9 fps ∼51% +33%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
14 fps ∼45%
TP-Link Neffos N1
6.9 fps ∼22% -51%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
4.8 fps ∼15% -66%
Sony Xperia XA1
15 fps ∼48% +7%
Nokia 7 Plus
15 fps ∼48% +7%
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps ∼32% -30%
Motorola Moto X4
11 fps ∼35% -21%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼100% +121%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 15, n=12)
13.7 fps ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=521)
18.3 fps ∼59% +31%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
9 fps ∼26%
TP-Link Neffos N1
4.1 fps ∼12% -54%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.7 fps ∼8% -70%
Sony Xperia XA1
3.7 fps ∼11% -59%
Nokia 7 Plus
8.3 fps ∼24% -8%
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps ∼16% -39%
Motorola Moto X4
5.3 fps ∼15% -41%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼100% +289%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.1 - 9.1, n=11)
8.89 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=444)
13.5 fps ∼39% +50%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
8.6 fps ∼43%
TP-Link Neffos N1
4.1 fps ∼21% -52%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
2.7 fps ∼14% -69%
Sony Xperia XA1
7.9 fps ∼40% -8%
Nokia 7 Plus
9.1 fps ∼46% +6%
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps ∼27% -37%
Motorola Moto X4
5.7 fps ∼29% -34%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼100% +133%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 9.8, n=12)
8.55 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=448)
12 fps ∼60% +40%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XA1
4.88 fps ∼32%
Nokia 7 Plus
15.07 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
15.1 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (0.74 - 38.7, n=71)
12.3 fps ∼81%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 6X
353 Points ∼42%
Sony Xperia XA1
191 Points ∼23% -46%
Nokia 7 Plus
349 Points ∼42% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (349 - 353, n=2)
351 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 3575, n=124)
831 Points ∼100% +135%

Legende

 
Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
TP-Link Neffos N1 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris VS Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA1 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼100% +67%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
53.89 Points ∼62% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=10)
52.4 Points ∼60% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
52.139 Points ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=582)
45.1 Points ∼52% -14%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
30.81 Points ∼35% -41%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)
29.019 Points ∼33% -44%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.993 Points ∼33% -44%
Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58)
28.45 Points ∼33% -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼100% +63%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
10945 Points ∼67% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=11)
10080 Points ∼62% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
9995 Points ∼61%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=745)
7422 Points ∼46% -26%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
5050 Points ∼31% -49%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points ∼30% -51%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)
4797 Points ∼29% -52%
Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58)
3956 Points ∼24% -60%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3305 Points ∼20% -67%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)
13541.3 ms * ∼100% -184%
Average of class Smartphone (550 - 59466, n=770)
10102 ms * ∼75% -112%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)
9701.2 ms * ∼72% -103%
Sony Xperia XA1
9506.4 ms * ∼70% -99%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * ∼70% -99%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
8396 ms * ∼62% -76%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
4768.9 ms * ∼35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=10)
4057 ms * ∼30% +15%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
3937.3 ms * ∼29% +17%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼18% +49%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
257 Points ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)
173 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)
171 Points ∼67% -1%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)
168 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=343)
124 Points ∼48% -28%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points ∼39% -42%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
86 Points ∼33% -50%
Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58)
78 Points ∼30% -55%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)
78 Points ∼30% -55%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Mi 6XTP-Link Neffos N1BQ Aquaris VS PlusSony Xperia XA1Nokia 7 PlusHTC U11 LifeMotorola Moto X4HTC U12 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
132%
-10%
9%
42%
135%
157%
408%
64%
68%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.59 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
68.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
62.31
59.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
57.5 (11.2 - 74.7, n=117)
50.5 (1.7 - 87.1, n=491)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
75.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
82.21
82.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
83.91 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.5 (21.1 - 87.2, n=117)
68.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=491)
Random Write 4KB
6.89
45.48
560%
6.4
-7%
13.2
92%
19.62
185%
50.2
629%
55.3
703%
104.24
1413%
27 (3.4 - 133, n=134)
292%
29.5 (0.14 - 272, n=828)
328%
Random Read 4KB
72.98
57.37
-21%
48.3
-34%
66.2
-9%
54.65
-25%
39.3
-46%
45.4
-38%
118.14
62%
56 (11.4 - 149, n=134)
-23%
54.2 (1.59 - 265, n=828)
-26%
Sequential Write 256KB
203.7
184.56
-9%
205.1
1%
127.8
-37%
211.6
4%
120
-41%
120.5
-41%
195.82
-4%
174 (40 - 254, n=134)
-15%
113 (2.99 - 750, n=828)
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
271.98
262.1
-4%
274.3
1%
248.5
-9%
283.12
4%
268
-1%
281.6
4%
709.11
161%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=134)
0%
311 (12.1 - 1781, n=828)
14%
World of Tanks Blitz
 InstellingenWaarde
 high, 0xAA, 0xAF60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Dead Trigger 2
 InstellingenWaarde
 high30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InstellingenWaarde
 high28 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 36.9 °C34.6 °C37 °C 
 37.2 °C34.4 °C36.3 °C 
 35.7 °C33 °C34.5 °C 
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.5 °C
33.5 °C36 °C36.5 °C
33.9 °C36 °C36.7 °C
32.9 °C35.2 °C36.1 °C
Maximum: 36.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  32.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.240.92532.939.93137.234.94031.740.35039.639.16328.334.18027.332.310026.928.712526.731.5160243920020.946.225020.948.331519.555.740018.562.950017.565.863017.569.680015.769.2100015.870125016.675.2160015.873.7200015.474.2250015.573.531501671.6400015.873.150001671.6630016.367.1800016.367.71000016.271.81250016.475.51600016.459.9SPL28.684.1N1.158.5median 16.4median 69.2Delta2.18.835.245.132.941.137.238.931.736.639.642.728.33427.33026.930.226.736.32441.720.946.520.950.619.551.718.557.517.556.917.556.615.760.915.870.316.675.715.878.515.479.615.581.21679.415.8781674.416.377.316.381.316.283.816.468.316.455.328.690.21.176median 16.4median 68.32.113.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 6XHTC U11 Life
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

HTC U11 Life audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.65 / 1.94 / 1.97 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.65 / 5.93 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 6X
3010 mAh
TP-Link Neffos N1
3260 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XA1
2300 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
19%
-8%
43%
-6%
7%
13%
-29%
-13%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.65
0.69
-6%
0.79
-22%
0.64
2%
0.65
-0%
0.63
3%
0.65
-0%
0.77
-18%
0.741 (0.56 - 1.2, n=11)
-14%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=842)
-36%
Idle Average *
1.94
1.64
15%
2.29
-18%
0.81
58%
1.76
9%
2.1
-8%
1.51
22%
2.18
-12%
1.941 (1.4 - 2.32, n=11)
-0%
1.748 (0.6 - 6.2, n=841)
10%
Idle Maximum *
1.97
1.67
15%
2.3
-17%
0.86
56%
1.78
10%
2.15
-9%
1.57
20%
2.21
-12%
2.22 (1.54 - 4.1, n=11)
-13%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=842)
-3%
Load Average *
4.65
2.59
44%
3.84
17%
2.09
55%
4.47
4%
3.34
28%
3.88
17%
6.25
-34%
4.59 (3.47 - 8.2, n=11)
1%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=836)
12%
Load Maximum *
5.93
4.36
26%
5.95
-0%
3.31
44%
9.13
-54%
4.83
19%
5.47
8%
10.16
-71%
8.27 (5.93 - 12.2, n=11)
-39%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=836)
-2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
17h 26min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 08min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 12min
Xiaomi Mi 6X
3010 mAh
TP-Link Neffos N1
3260 mAh
BQ Aquaris VS Plus
3400 mAh
Sony Xperia XA1
2300 mAh
Nokia 7 Plus
3800 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Batterijduur
57%
30%
33%
24%
52%
39%
9%
Reader / Idle
1046
1433
37%
1703
63%
1820
74%
1652
58%
1452
39%
H.264
608
751
24%
706
16%
798
31%
688
13%
464
-24%
WiFi v1.3
495
776
57%
644
30%
675
36%
672
36%
725
46%
659
33%
507
2%
Load
192
256
33%
158
-18%
303
58%
289
51%
230
20%

Pro

+ uitstekende bouwkwaliteit
+ prima camera's
+ nauwkeurige GPS
+ prima prestaties

Contra

- luidspreker
- lage schermhelderheid
- batterijduur
- (software + verkrijgbaarheid)
Onder de loep: Xiaomi Mi 6X. Testtoestel voorzien door: TradingShenzhen.
Onder de loep: Xiaomi Mi 6X. Testtoestel voorzien door: TradingShenzhen.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Xiaomi Mi 6X is een krachtige mid-range smartphone die minder kost dan vergelijkbaar uitgeruste smartphones die verkrijgbaar zijn in Europa. De prestaties en connectiviteit zijn indrukwekkend voor een smartphone in deze prijsklasse. Ook de bouwkwaliteit en aluminium behuizing zijn van een ander niveau.

Xiaomi heeft moeten besparen op de luidspreker, de ontbrekende SD-kaartlezer en de relatief beperkte batterijcapaciteit. Gezichtsherkenning presteert ook zwak en de dual-camera-module heeft het lastig bij weinig licht.

De beperkte verkrijgbaarheid, Chinese software en ontoereikende LTE-dekking maken het moeilijk m de Mi 6X aan te bevelen aan Europese consumenten. Dit alles zal echter veranderen wanneer de Mi A2 naar Europa komt.

De Xiaomi Mi 6X zal interessant worden wanneer het zustermodel Mi A2 de Europese markt betreedt, wat in augustus zou moeten gebeuren. De Mi A2 beschikt over Android One en biedt ondersteuning voor LTE-band 20. De Mi 6X is een evenwichtige smartphone die krachtige hardware biedt en slechts een aantal toegevingen moet doen ten opzichte van andere toestellen in deze prijsklasse.

Xiaomi Mi 6X - 02-07-2018 v6(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
87%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
92%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
43 / 60 → 72%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
54 / 63 → 86%
Applicatie-performance
60 / 70 → 85%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
75%
Gemiddelde
77%
86%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 6X (Mi A2) Smartphone
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-07-16 (Update: 2018-07-16)