Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Eluktronics Matrix RP-17 Laptop: Core i9-prestaties zonder de Core i9-prijs

Kunnen we a.u.b. een GeForce RTX 2070-optie krijgen? Met zo'n 1100 euro heeft de Eluktronics RP-17 ongeveer dezelfde prijs als de meeste Intel-aangedreven versies met dezelfde GeForce RTX 2060-GPU, maar de Ryzen 7 4800H zal sneller zijn dan elke mobiele Core i7-optie die je kunt vinden.
Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo,
Eluktronics RP-17
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir (Zen 2)
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile - 6144 MB, Core: 1005 MHz, Geheugen: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 442.80
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, Avant DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Beeldscherm
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, BOE07B6, glimmend: nee, 144 Hz
Moederbord
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Opslag
Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD, 1024 GB 
Geluidskaart
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD-lezer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 30 x 395 x 261
Batterij
62 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 4 W x2, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Eluktronics Control Center, 12 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.553 kg, Voeding: 563 g
Prijs
1300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
84 %
08-2020
Eluktronics RP-17
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.6 kg30 mm17.3"1920x1080
85 %
07-2020
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.6 kg27.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
87 %
06-2020
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.7 kg19.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
83 %
05-2020
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
2.6 kg26 mm17.3"1920x1080
85 %
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.5 kg27.5 mm17.3"1920x1080
82 %
12-2019
Aorus 17 YA
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
3.8 kg38 mm17.3"1920x1080
396 mm 293 mm 38 mm 3.8 kg395 mm 261 mm 30 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 269 mm 26 mm 2.6 kg397 mm 269 mm 27.5 mm 2.6 kg396 mm 261 mm 27.5 mm 2.5 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.7 kg
Voor: geen connectiviteit
Voor: geen connectiviteit
Rechts: SD-lezer, 2x USB 3.1 Gen. 1 Type-A
Rechts: SD-lezer, 2x USB 3.1 Gen. 1 Type-A
Achter: 2x mini-DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB Type-C, AC-voeding
Achter: 2x mini-DisplayPort, HDMI 2.0, USB Type-C, AC-voeding
Links: Kensington Lock, Gigabit RJ-45, USB 2.0 Type-A, 3.5-mm-microfoon, 3.5-mm-koptelefoon
Links: Kensington Lock, Gigabit RJ-45, USB 2.0 Type-A, 3.5-mm-microfoon, 3.5-mm-koptelefoon
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.5 MB/s ∼100% +476%
Aorus 17 YA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206 MB/s ∼99% +469%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.7 MB/s ∼35% +101%
Eluktronics RP-17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.2 MB/s ∼17%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
27.4 MB/s ∼13% -24%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17 YA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100% +568%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208.3 MB/s ∼85% +466%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.7 MB/s ∼34% +125%
Eluktronics RP-17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
36.8 MB/s ∼15%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.5 MB/s ∼13% -14%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Eluktronics RP-17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1453 (1227min - 1527max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1338 (743min - 1500max) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1182 (1085min - 1338max) MBit/s ∼81% -19%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
634 (621min - 646max) MBit/s ∼44% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1468 (1308min - 1587max) MBit/s ∼100% +20%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1283 (1089min - 1413max) MBit/s ∼87% +5%
Eluktronics RP-17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1223 (1026min - 1365max) MBit/s ∼83%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
623 (577min - 656max) MBit/s ∼42% -49%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1452 (1227-1527)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1026-1365)
ColorChecker
5.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Eluktronics RP-17: 8.49 ∆E min: 2.23 - max: 14.37 ∆E
295.5
cd/m²
297.1
cd/m²
298.7
cd/m²
302.4
cd/m²
311.5
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
308.4
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
284.3
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
BOE NV173FHM-N44
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 311.5 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 301.3 cd/m² Minimum: 14.45 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 311.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1005:1 (Zwart: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.13 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 2.93
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Eluktronics RP-17
BOE NV173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Sharp LQ173M1JW02, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
BOE NV173FHM-NX1, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
BOE HF N173FHM-N44, IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Aorus 17 YA
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Response Times
882%
48%
-30%
6%
18%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
22.4 (10.8, 11.6)
6.8 (3.4, 3.4)
70%
5.6 (2.6, 3)
75%
22.4 (11.6, 10.8)
-0%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
21%
16 (8.4, 7.6)
29%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (7.2, 4.8)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
27%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
20%
19.2 (9.6, 9.6)
-60%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-7%
11.2 (6.4, 4.8)
7%
PWM Frequency
943.4
25000 (18)
2550%
980.4 (99)
4%
Screen
19%
-11%
-26%
11%
29%
Brightness middle
311.5
337.9
8%
328
5%
264.8
-15%
314.2
1%
253
-19%
Brightness
301
305
1%
329
9%
253
-16%
307
2%
252
-16%
Brightness Distribution
91
81
-11%
78
-14%
90
-1%
92
1%
93
2%
Black Level *
0.31
0.29
6%
0.35
-13%
0.31
-0%
0.26
16%
0.2
35%
Contrast
1005
1165
16%
937
-7%
854
-15%
1208
20%
1265
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.13
2.18
47%
4.74
-15%
4.73
-15%
3.15
24%
1.14
72%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.32
3.9
47%
8.99
-23%
18.89
-158%
5.4
26%
2.01
73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.93
0.69
76%
2.12
28%
4.64
-58%
2.74
6%
1.01
66%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
3.1
6%
6.8
-106%
1.4
58%
2.6
21%
1.12
66%
Gamma
2.17 101%
2.07 106%
2.2 100%
2.16 102%
2.31 95%
2.43 91%
CCT
7157 91%
6882 94%
6446 101%
6641 98%
6928 94%
6366 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59.5
62
4%
64.8
9%
38.4
-35%
59.6
0%
66
11%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.6
98.2
7%
98.6
8%
59.3
-35%
91.8
0%
98
7%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
451% / 204%
19% / -2%
-28% / -27%
9% / 10%
24% / 28%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
12 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 7.2 ms stijging
↘ 4.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
22.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 10.8 ms stijging
↘ 11.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 943.4 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 943.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 943.4 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17699 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940Tooltip
Eluktronics RP-17 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1923 (1913.23-1932.18)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1620 (1596.04-1713.21)
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1587 (1552.73-1737.47)
MSI GE75 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1619 (1602.44-1728.31)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) - CPU (Multi Core)
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
6381 Points ∼100% +40%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
4926 Points ∼77% +8%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4552 Points ∼71%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (3956 - 4663, n=11)
4312 Points ∼68% -5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4288 Points ∼67% -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
3885 Points ∼61% -15%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3883 Points ∼61% -15%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
3712 Points ∼58% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points ∼51% -29%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
3178 Points ∼50% -30%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
2308 Points ∼36% -49%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) - CPU (Single Core)
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
532 Points ∼100% +10%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
509 Points ∼96% +5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
495 Points ∼93% +2%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
489 Points ∼92% +1%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
484 Points ∼91%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (468 - 491, n=10)
482 Points ∼91% 0%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
475 Points ∼89% -2%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
460 Points ∼86% -5%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
441 Points ∼83% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points ∼80% -12%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points ∼79% -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit - CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
2620 Points ∼100% +36%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points ∼77% +5%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1932 (1913.23min - 1932.18max) Points ∼74%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (1741 - 1995, n=15)
1867 Points ∼71% -3%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
1863 Points ∼71% -4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1737 (1552.73min - 1737.47max) Points ∼66% -10%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼66% -11%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1713 (1596.04min - 1713.21max) Points ∼65% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (1313.46min - 1397.77max) Points ∼53% -28%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1347 (1253.05min - 1347.16max) Points ∼51% -30%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
1116 (974.99min - 1115.73max) Points ∼43% -42%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit - CPU Single 64Bit
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
224 Points ∼100% +20%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points ∼95% +13%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
203 Points ∼91% +9%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
198 Points ∼88% +6%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
193 Points ∼86% +3%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼84% +1%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
189 Points ∼84% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (186 - 189, n=11)
188 Points ∼84% +1%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points ∼83%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points ∼79% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points ∼77% -7%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU - BMW27 CPU
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
466 Seconds * ∼100% -88%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
347 Seconds * ∼74% -40%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * ∼74% -39%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
297 Seconds * ∼64% -20%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
293 Seconds * ∼63% -18%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
286 Seconds * ∼61% -15%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
280 Seconds * ∼60% -13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (248 - 284, n=8)
264 Seconds * ∼57% -6%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
248 Seconds * ∼53%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
167.3 Seconds * ∼36% +33%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 - 7z b 4 -mmt1
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
5954 MIPS ∼100% +28%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5336 MIPS ∼90% +15%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
5232 MIPS ∼88% +13%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
5026 MIPS ∼84% +8%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
4924 MIPS ∼83% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (4584 - 4725, n=8)
4675 MIPS ∼79% +1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
4634 MIPS ∼78% 0%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4634 MIPS ∼78%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
4580 MIPS ∼77% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS ∼75% -4%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 - 7z b 4
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
70968 MIPS ∼100% +41%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50428 MIPS ∼71%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (45679 - 53883, n=8)
49957 MIPS ∼70% -1%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
48577 MIPS ∼68% -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
48397 MIPS ∼68% -4%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
46591 MIPS ∼66% -8%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
45938 MIPS ∼65% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS ∼52% -27%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
36370 MIPS ∼51% -28%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
29342 MIPS ∼41% -42%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
1449 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1302 Points ∼90% +11%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
1271 Points ∼88% +8%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
1219 Points ∼84% +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (1154 - 1207, n=9)
1183 Points ∼82% +1%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1176 Points ∼81%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
1117 Points ∼77% -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points ∼76% -6%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
11414 Points ∼100% +45%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8666 Points ∼76% +10%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
8363 Points ∼73% +6%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7864 Points ∼69%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (5920 - 8672, n=9)
7736 Points ∼68% -2%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
6298 Points ∼55% -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points ∼46% -33%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
4897 Points ∼43% -38%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset - 4k Preset
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
21 fps ∼100% +60%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.1 fps ∼62%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps ∼61% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (10.8 - 14.1, n=8)
12.6 fps ∼60% -4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.5 fps ∼60% -5%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
12.193 fps ∼58% -7%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
11.865 fps ∼57% -9%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.5 fps ∼50% -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps ∼44% -29%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.2 fps ∼39% -37%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF - 20 Documents To PDF
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
76.02 s ∼100% +32%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (28.6 - 95.8, n=8)
66.9 s ∼88% +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s ∼84% +11%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
57.7 s ∼76%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
55.3 s ∼73% -4%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
51.9 s ∼68% -10%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
50.2 s ∼66% -13%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean - Overall mean
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.679 sec * ∼100% -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec * ∼92% -8%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.617 sec * ∼91% -6%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.589 sec * ∼87% -1%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.582 sec * ∼86%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
  (0.568 - 0.603, n=8)
0.582 sec * ∼86% -0%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.581 sec * ∼86% -0%
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K
0.528 sec * ∼78% +9%

* ... kleiner is beter

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1932 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
90.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
187 Points
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
10434 Points ∼81% +56%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8560 Points ∼66% +28%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8094 Points ∼63% +21%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7301 Points ∼56% +9%
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
6681 Points ∼52%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5695 - 6808, n=5)
6491 Points ∼50% -3%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
6436 Points ∼50% -4%
Productivity
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
8877 Points ∼85% +23%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8219 Points ∼79% +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
8028 Points ∼77% +11%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7587 Points ∼73% +5%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
7547 Points ∼72% +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (7122 - 7586, n=5)
7278 Points ∼70% +1%
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
7221 Points ∼69%
Essentials
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
10408 Points ∼91% +14%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
10047 Points ∼88% +10%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9852 Points ∼86% +8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
9831 Points ∼86% +8%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9598 Points ∼84% +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (8806 - 9784, n=5)
9355 Points ∼82% +3%
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
9125 Points ∼80%
Score
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7082 Points ∼87% +30%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6290 Points ∼78% +15%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6268 Points ∼77% +15%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5797 Points ∼71% +6%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5617 Points ∼69% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5095 - 5706, n=5)
5459 Points ∼67% 0%
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
5454 Points ∼67%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6524 Points ∼96% +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
6317 Points ∼93% +10%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5928 Points ∼87% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5742 - 5983, n=4)
5867 Points ∼86% +2%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5749 Points ∼84% 0%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5746 Points ∼84% 0%
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
5742 Points ∼84%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5731 Points ∼94% +19%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
5217 Points ∼86% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (4698 - 5197, n=4)
4912 Points ∼81% +2%
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
4816 Points ∼79%
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4780 Points ∼78% -1%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4515 Points ∼74% -6%
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4445 Points ∼73% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4816 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5742 punten
Help
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8851.6 μs * ∼100% -690%
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
1217.7 μs * ∼14% -9%
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
1120.3 μs * ∼13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
1029.5 μs * ∼12% +8%

* ... kleiner is beter

Eluktronics RP-17
Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
Lite-On CA5-8D512
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Aorus 17 YA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
AS SSD
4%
-27%
-22%
-29%
-9%
Copy Game MB/s
1303.65
1418.64
9%
1506.29
16%
1263.5
-3%
1327.7
2%
Copy Program MB/s
578.92
205.48
-65%
621.74
7%
552.56
-5%
564.17
-3%
Copy ISO MB/s
2124.04
1900.16
-11%
1714.9
-19%
1736.07
-18%
1612.15
-24%
Score Total
4112
4863
18%
2392
-42%
2333
-43%
2137
-48%
3062
-26%
Score Write
2194
2045
-7%
1034
-53%
1132
-48%
992
-55%
1254
-43%
Score Read
1262
1865
48%
913
-28%
775
-39%
730
-42%
1232
-2%
Access Time Write *
0.102
0.09
12%
0.167
-64%
0.113
-11%
0.127
-25%
0.03
71%
Access Time Read *
0.04
0.049
-23%
0.058
-45%
0.043
-8%
0.045
-13%
0.052
-30%
4K-64 Write
1841.37
1734.24
-6%
812.64
-56%
819.84
-55%
724.56
-61%
978.73
-47%
4K-64 Read
1042.88
1600.88
54%
664.71
-36%
586.4
-44%
583.09
-44%
925.62
-11%
4K Write
182.93
127.15
-30%
90.18
-51%
158.51
-13%
107.45
-41%
118.88
-35%
4K Read
50.04
60.56
21%
46.61
-7%
56.27
12%
42.9
-14%
34.96
-30%
Seq Write
1694.54
1834.63
8%
1314.33
-22%
1538.61
-9%
1604.22
-5%
1561.35
-8%
Seq Read
1688.73
2036.44
21%
2019.26
20%
1319.58
-22%
1037.88
-39%
2715.87
61%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
4%
7%
-6%
-12%
8%
Write 4K
226.1
139.2
-38%
119
-47%
189.7
-16%
134
-41%
139.6
-38%
Read 4K
54.74
53.03
-3%
51.87
-5%
62.25
14%
55.45
1%
62.89
15%
Write Seq
1868
1950
4%
2258
21%
1681
-10%
1292
-31%
1573
-16%
Read Seq
1648
2328
41%
2283
39%
1608
-2%
1476
-10%
2808
70%
Write 4K Q32T1
429.9
408.9
-5%
491
14%
468.6
9%
545.4
27%
509.3
18%
Read 4K Q32T1
521.2
550.9
6%
539.7
4%
540.6
4%
581.9
12%
639.3
23%
Write Seq Q32T1
2248
1938
-14%
2253
0%
1770
-21%
1746
-22%
1573
-30%
Read Seq Q32T1
2484
3467
40%
3172
28%
1898
-24%
1793
-28%
3082
24%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
4% / 4%
-10% / -15%
-14% / -16%
-21% / -23%
-1% / -2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2484 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2248 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 521.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 429.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1648 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1868 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 54.74 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 226.1 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650166016701680169017001710172017301740175017601770178017901800181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010202020302040205020602070208020902100211021202130214021502160217021802190Tooltip
: Ø2166 (1715.05-2181.67)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H
10181 Points ∼100% +60%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
9638 Points ∼95% +51%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
8000 Points ∼79% +26%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points ∼76% +21%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7358 Points ∼72% +15%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
7057 Points ∼69% +11%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6374 Points ∼63%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6312 Points ∼62% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5660 - 6910, n=30)
6173 Points ∼61% -3%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5689 Points ∼56% -11%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5454 Points ∼54% -14%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3749 Points ∼37% -41%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
3506 Points ∼34% -45%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
9629 Points ∼100% +44%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H
9526 Points ∼99% +43%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7878 Points ∼82% +18%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
7863 Points ∼82% +18%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
7633 Points ∼79% +14%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
7392 Points ∼77% +11%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6680 Points ∼69%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
6610 Points ∼69% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (5679 - 6926, n=30)
6232 Points ∼65% -7%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5651 Points ∼59% -15%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
5640 Points ∼59% -16%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
3751 Points ∼39% -44%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
3437 Points ∼36% -49%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H
25727 Points ∼100% +54%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
24416 Points ∼95% +46%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
21138 Points ∼82% +27%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
21004 Points ∼82% +26%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points ∼75% +16%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
18807 Points ∼73% +13%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
18517 Points ∼72% +11%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
17792 Points ∼69% +7%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
16694 Points ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (14768 - 18114, n=33)
16174 Points ∼63% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14444 Points ∼56% -13%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
12038 Points ∼47% -28%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
9274 Points ∼36% -44%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
17605 Points ∼100% +36%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
17603 Points ∼100% +36%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
16266 Points ∼92% +25%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points ∼78% +6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
13126 Points ∼75% +1%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
12972 Points ∼74%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12851 Points ∼73% -1%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
12512 Points ∼71% -4%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H
12286 Points ∼70% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (1107 - 14726, n=29)
11587 Points ∼66% -11%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11288 Points ∼64% -13%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
7358 Points ∼42% -43%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
6528 Points ∼37% -50%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-9750H
35754 Points ∼100% +53%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
34021 Points ∼95% +45%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
27955 Points ∼78% +19%
Eurocom Nightsky RX17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
26752 Points ∼75% +14%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points ∼74% +13%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H
25706 Points ∼72% +10%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H
24066 Points ∼67% +3%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H
23414 Points ∼65% 0%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
23409 Points ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (19143 - 24617, n=29)
21114 Points ∼59% -10%
Asus ROG Strix G GL731GU-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20224 Points ∼57% -14%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ
15145 Points ∼42% -35%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 3550H
13337 Points ∼37% -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
20068 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39513 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15584 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
6680 punten
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K, NVIDIA Titan RTX
142 (88min - 220max) fps ∼100% +115%
Asus Strix Scar 17 G732LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
95.7 (49min) fps ∼67% +45%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.6 (31min - 114max) fps ∼51% +10%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
66.1 fps ∼47%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
62.4 fps ∼44% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (56.8 - 66.1, n=3)
62.3 fps ∼44% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
42 (20min) fps ∼30% -36%
Asus TUF FX705DT-AU068T
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
33.6 fps ∼24% -49%
010203040506070Tooltip
Eluktronics RP-17 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD: Ø59 (55-64)
lage gem. hoge ultra4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 266.5 121.9 62.1 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 118 113 105 101 87 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 144 85.6 66.1 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 92.1 81.8 68.8 fps
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Lite-On CA5-8D512
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Noise
-7%
-7%
-8%
-0%
-44%
off / environment *
26.2
28.4
-8%
28.2
-8%
28.7
-10%
28.7
-10%
30
-15%
Idle Minimum *
26.2
30.2
-15%
28.2
-8%
28.7
-10%
28.7
-10%
42
-60%
Idle Average *
26.2
30.2
-15%
28.2
-8%
30.5
-16%
28.7
-10%
44
-68%
Idle Maximum *
30
32
-7%
30.5
-2%
32.5
-8%
29.5
2%
52
-73%
Load Average *
38.5
33.2
14%
42.2
-10%
42.5
-10%
31.4
18%
56
-45%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47.2
55
-17%
53
-12%
50.1
-6%
44.5
6%
60
-27%
Load Maximum *
54.6
55
-1%
55.5
-2%
53.4
2%
54
1%
64
-17%

* ... kleiner is beter

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
26.2 / 26.2 / 30 dB (A)
Belasting
38.5 / 54.6 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 26.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.232.535.333.835.92531.330.530.432.330.73132.232.533.332.532.6402426.223.925.824.95027.824.522.824.724.6632527.226.626.726.38024.723.62322.627.11002522.721.120.826.512526.423.522.717.829.816027.323.719.717.629.420030.325.221.318.332.125031.326.721.317.736.331534.129.723.618.339.14003731.224.21740.850036.930.222.11641.763036.228.821.714.741.380036.528.620.114.143.2100036.927.818.513.743.1125037.428.118.613.844.3160034.725.617.813.642.2200036.727.718.61344.625003727.615.413.744.431503723.315.113.843.2400034.322.414.513.843.9500031.521.614.313.843630028.220.213.813.739.2800023.224.913.913.734.31000020.723.213.913.731.21250020.322.813.813.727.21600020.526.81313.121.9SPL47.238.53026.254.6N5.83.11.30.89.8median 34.1median 25.6median 18.6median 13.8median 40.8Delta5.72.63.51.35.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseEluktronics RP-17
Max. Belasting
 36.4 °C38.8 °C36.2 °C 
 29.8 °C37.8 °C27.4 °C 
 24.6 °C26.2 °C26.4 °C 
Maximum: 38.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 31.5 °C
41 °C41.8 °C45.8 °C
25.8 °C37.2 °C34 °C
24.2 °C25.2 °C25.2 °C
Maximum: 45.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 33.4 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  55 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.2 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 42.6 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.2 °C / 2.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.335.333.32532.330.432.33132.233.332.24024.723.924.75023.522.823.56323.526.623.58022.62322.610022.121.122.112527.722.727.716040.419.740.42004521.34525052.121.352.131555.523.655.540059.324.259.35006122.16163069.221.769.280073.720.173.7100070.418.570.4125065.518.665.5160064.617.864.6200065.118.665.125006015.460315059.415.159.4400062.814.562.8500063.314.363.3630063.413.863.4800063.313.963.31000063.413.963.41250063.513.863.51600059.71359.7SPL783078N41.31.341.3median 62.8median 18.6median 62.8Delta5.53.55.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEluktronics RP-17Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eluktronics RP-17 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.59 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 20.2 / 24.5 / 28.7 Watt
Belasting midlight 110.4 / 217.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eluktronics RP-17
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Aorus 17 YA
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
8%
-2%
34%
11%
-50%
Idle Minimum *
20.2
14.7
27%
19.6
3%
7.4
63%
11.4
44%
34
-68%
Idle Average *
24.5
20.4
17%
21.7
11%
10.5
57%
16.3
33%
37
-51%
Idle Maximum *
28.7
26.9
6%
36.1
-26%
17
41%
31.8
-11%
41
-43%
Load Average *
110.4
93.2
16%
115.6
-5%
103.7
6%
92.9
16%
123
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
166.3
185.4
-11%
157
6%
128.1
23%
171.5
-3%
250
-50%
Load Maximum *
217.4
237.8
-9%
219.9
-1%
183.2
16%
243.3
-12%
386
-78%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 23min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 08min
Eluktronics RP-17
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh
MSI GE75 Raider 10SE-008US
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 65 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2070 Max-Q 300 Hz
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus TUF A17 FA706IU-AS76
R7 4800H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 90 Wh
Walmart EVOO Gaming 17
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 46 Wh
Aorus 17 YA
i9-9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 94.24 Wh
Batterijduur
-16%
13%
142%
-5%
26%
Reader / Idle
543
WiFi v1.3
263
222
-16%
296
13%
512
95%
249
-5%
235
-11%
Load
68
196
188%
111
63%

Pro

+ 144-Hz 1080p-paneel met snelle responstijden als standaard
+ eenvoudig te upgraden WLAN, 2x M.2 opslag en RAM
+ degelijke core-temperaturen tijdens het gamen
+ uitstekende CPU-prestaties
+ bescheiden, onopvallend design
+ hoge CPU-prestaties per euro

Contra

- PWM op bijna alle helderheidsniveaus
- ernstige ongelijkmatige backlight-bleeding
- geen 2,5-inch SATA III-ondersteuning
- kan niet worden opgeladen via USB-C
- zeer trage SD-kaartlezer
- geen RGB-verlichting per toets
- geen webcam-sluiter
- relatief dik
Getest: Eluktronics RP-17. Testtoestel voorzien door Eluktronics
Getest: Eluktronics RP-17. Testtoestel voorzien door Eluktronics

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Net als bij de 15,6-inch Eluktronics RP-15, is de 17,3-inch RP-17 aantrekkelijk vanwege het eenvoudige ontwerp, het 144 Hz-scherm, de eenvoudige upgradebaarheid en de Zen 2 Ryzen 7-CPU voor dezelfde prijs als de meeste Core i7-alternatieven uitgerust met dezelfde GeForce RTX 2060 GPU. Core-temperaturen tijdens het gamen liggen ook lager dan verwacht, waarschijnlijk omdat de behuizing zelf nog snellere GPU-opties kan ondersteunen die Eluktronics momenteel helaas niet biedt. De turboventilatormodus is niet echt nodig om de framesnelheden te maximaliseren, zodat gebruikers kunnen gamen met de functie uitgeschakeld voor stillere ventilatoren. De behuizing voelt duurzamer aan dan de MSI GF75, ook al bereikt het niet helemaal hetzelfde niveau als de duurdere MSI GT-serie of Asus ROG Strix-serie.

De merkbare backlight-bleeding en de iets dikkere behuizing zijn de belangrijkste nadelen van het systeem. Verwacht van de RP-17 niet dezelfde gestroomlijnde, fotogenieke ervaring die je zou kunnen verwachten van een MSI GS66, Asus Zephyrus of Razer Blade.

Misschien is de grootste concurrent de Asus TUF A17, die kan worden geconfigureerd met exact dezelfde CPU- en GPU-opties voor ongeveer 100 tot 200 euro meer. Het Asus-systeem wordt warmer en luider tijdens het gamen, deels omdat het een dunnere machine is.

De Eluktronics RP-17 richt zich op de basis-game-ervaring zonder enige visuele afleiding die de prijs kan opdrijven. Het basispaneel van 144 Hz is opmerkelijk in vergelijking met andere gaming-laptops in deze prijsklasse, waar minderwaardige 60-Hz- of 120-Hz-panelen gebruikelijk zijn.

Eluktronics RP-17 - 09-08-2020 v7
Allen Ngo

Behuizing
80 / 98 → 82%
Toetsenbord
89%
Aanwijsapparaat
75%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
61 / 80 → 77%
Gewicht
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Batterij
60 / 95 → 63%
Beeldscherm
84%
Gaming-performance
93%
Applicatie-performance
92%
Temperatuur
90 / 95 → 95%
Luidheid
78 / 90 → 87%
Audio
73%
Camera
36 / 85 → 42%
Gemiddelde
75%
84%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde