Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Aorus 17 YA Gaming Laptop: Extreme prestaties, extreem geluid

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser, 06-12-2019

De walvis ademt. Het is groot, het is luid en het is zwaar. Zeker, de Aorus 17 is niet bedoeld voor degenen die van verfijnde en stille laptops houden. In plaats daarvan biedt het apparaat veel prestaties voor gamers en is het gericht op diegenen die niet bang zijn voor enorme notebooks. In onze test ontdekken we wat de nieuwe Aorus 17 YA precies te bieden heeft.

EvaluatieDatumModelGewichtHoogteFormaatResolutieBest Price
82%12-2019Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
3.8 kg38 mm17.3"1920x1080
87%11-2019Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.3"3840x2160
86%Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.7 kg48 mm17.3"1920x1080
83%09-2019Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
4.8 kg42 mm17.3"1920x1080
84%06-2019MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.3"1920x1080
Aorus 17 YA
Processor
Intel Core i9-9980HK
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1380 MHz, Geheugen: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, alle slots bezet, 64 GB max
Beeldscherm
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, Full-HD, 240 Hz, X-Rite Pantone, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8, 1024 GB 
, + WDC WDC20SPZX-22UA7T0, 2 TB HDD. Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 and 1x 2.5 inche
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Verbindingen
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: 1x 3.5 mm koptelefoon, 1x 3.5 mm microfoon, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 38 x 396 x 293
Batterij
94.24 Wh, 6200 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280 x 720)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2.1 luidsprekersysteem (stereo + subwoofer), Toetsenbord: chiclet, RGB, mechanisch, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 2x 330 Watt stroomadapter, XSplit Gamecaster Premium abonnement (3 maanden), XSplit Broadcaster Premium abonnement (3 maanden), 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
3.826 kg, Voeding: 2.352 kg
Prijs
3900 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
Linkerkant: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, 1x Thunderbolt 3, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, 1x microfoon, 1x koptelefoon
Linkerkant: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, 1x Thunderbolt 3, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, 1x microfoon, 1x koptelefoon
Rechterkant: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, UHS-II SD kaartlezer, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A
Rechterkant: 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C, UHS-II SD kaartlezer, 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A
Achterkant: HDMI, 2x stroomaansluiting, GigabitLAN
Achterkant: HDMI, 2x stroomaansluiting, GigabitLAN
Voorkant: geen aansluitingen
Voorkant: geen aansluitingen
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17 YA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181.3 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=264)
91.5 MB/s ∼44% -56%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG G703GXR
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Aorus 17 YA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s ∼83% -17%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=262)
109 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
692 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Aorus 17 YA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
687 MBit/s ∼99%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
682 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
655 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1490, n=286)
620 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Aorus 17 YA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
743 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
729 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
677 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
668 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
647 (min: 652) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1420, n=286)
573 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
253
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
255
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 261 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 251.6 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 93 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 253 cd/m²
Contrast: 1265:1 (Zwart: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.14 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 1.12 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 66% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Aorus 17 YA
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
Asus ROG G703GXR
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
AU Optronics B173HAN03.1 (AUO319D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Chi Mei N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Response Times
6%
23%
-5%
33%
36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 (8.4, 7.6)
15.2 (8.4, 6.8)
5%
6.4 (3.4, 3)
60%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-5%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
55%
6.8 (3.4, 3.4)
57%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6.4, 4.8)
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
7%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-14%
11.6 (6, 5.6)
-4%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
11%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
14%
PWM Frequency
25510 (17)
Screen
-124%
-101%
-136%
-10%
-64%
Brightness middle
253
346.7
37%
290
15%
288
14%
366
45%
299.3
18%
Brightness
252
332
32%
281
12%
271
8%
343
36%
294
17%
Brightness Distribution
93
91
-2%
91
-2%
85
-9%
91
-2%
94
1%
Black Level *
0.2
0.27
-35%
0.2
-0%
0.2
-0%
0.29
-45%
0.29
-45%
Contrast
1265
1284
2%
1450
15%
1440
14%
1262
0%
1032
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.14
5.62
-393%
4.77
-318%
5.79
-408%
1.51
-32%
2.55
-124%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.01
9.36
-366%
9.08
-352%
11.89
-492%
3.22
-60%
4.73
-135%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.01
3.81
-277%
1.46
-45%
1.89
-87%
0.71
30%
2.9
-187%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.12
5.5
-391%
5.83
-421%
6.92
-518%
1.93
-72%
3.5
-213%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.25 98%
2.47 89%
2.46 89%
2.38 92%
2.28 96%
CCT
6366 102%
6175 105%
8076 80%
8433 77%
6881 94%
7101 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
66
87.2
32%
59
-11%
60
-9%
60
-9%
57
-14%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98
100
2%
92
-6%
92
-6%
94
-4%
88.7
-9%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-59% / -104%
-39% / -82%
-71% / -116%
12% / -4%
-14% / -49%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
11.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6.4 ms stijging
↘ 4.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
16 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 8.4 ms stijging
↘ 7.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 13573 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780Tooltip
Aorus 17 YA Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1717 (1628.6-1778.57)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77 Intel Core i9-9980HK, Intel Core i9-9980HK: Ø1328 (1301.11-1593.37)
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1024 (1016.29-1117.57)
Asus ROG G703GXR Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1251 (1244.71-1256.04)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1224 (1159.08-1279)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1133 (1114.27-1233.11)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 17 YA
Intel Core i9-9980HK
213 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points ∼94% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
185 Points ∼87% -13%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
171 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=540)
157 Points ∼74% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus 17 YA
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1880 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1481 Points ∼79% -21%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H
1279 Points ∼68% -32%
Asus ROG G703GXR
Intel Core i7-9750H
1256 Points ∼67% -33%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1233 Points ∼66% -34%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points ∼63% -37%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
1094 Points ∼58% -42%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=543)
845 Points ∼45% -55%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
213 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1880 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
159.45 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
7082 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0)
6453 Points ∼91% -9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6202 Points ∼88% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5955 Points ∼84% -16%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5804 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5780 Points ∼82% -18%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=235)
5264 Points ∼74% -26%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
6524 Points ∼100%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
5716 Points ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=409)
5060 Points ∼78% -22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4755 Points ∼73% -27%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4668 Points ∼72% -28%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5731 Points ∼100%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
4461 Points ∼78% -22%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=426)
4272 Points ∼75% -25%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4255 Points ∼74% -26%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
3841 Points ∼67% -33%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5731 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6524 punten
Help
Aorus 17 YA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Asus ROG G703GXR
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 (RAID 0)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR (RAID 0)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-12%
15%
12%
-23%
Write 4K
139.6
99.28
-29%
115.3
-17%
95.46
-32%
100.7
-28%
Read 4K
62.89
40.25
-36%
41.79
-34%
42.59
-32%
41.03
-35%
Write Seq
1573
2001
27%
2841
81%
2851
81%
1146
-27%
Read Seq
2808
2107
-25%
2547
-9%
2696
-4%
1115
-60%
Write 4K Q32T1
509.3
348.3
-32%
498.6
-2%
402.6
-21%
384.6
-24%
Read 4K Q32T1
639.3
391.5
-39%
554.5
-13%
443.9
-31%
429.5
-33%
Write Seq Q32T1
1573
2003
27%
3123
99%
3420
117%
1859
18%
Read Seq Q32T1
3082
3482
13%
3476
13%
3514
14%
3179
3%
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
Sequential Read: 2423 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1563 MB/s
512K Read: 1284 MB/s
512K Write: 1517 MB/s
4K Read: 35.85 MB/s
4K Write: 134.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 644.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 542.7 MB/s
3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
168006 Points ∼100% +17%
Aorus 17 YA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK
143755 Points ∼86%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
124764 Points ∼74% -13%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
124677 Points ∼74% -13%
Asus ROG G703GXR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
119847 Points ∼71% -17%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
118058 Points ∼70% -18%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=547)
68923 Points ∼41% -52%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-9980HK
39456 Points ∼23% -73%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47736 punten
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
105 (min: 86) fps ∼100% +10%
Asus ROG G703GXR
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
97.1 (min: 80) fps ∼92% +2%
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
95.4 (min: 80) fps ∼91%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
92.7 fps ∼88% -3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
87.4 fps ∼83% -8%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
76.9 fps ∼73% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK
66.5 fps ∼63% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=335)
50.8 fps ∼48% -47%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 high (2/3)
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
140.7 (min: 123) fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 141, n=28)
96.2 fps ∼68% -32%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
200 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
189.5 fps ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
177.7 fps ∼89% -11%
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
163.7 fps ∼82% -18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 XA RP77
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9980HK
155.7 fps ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=358)
99.7 fps ∼50% -50%
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Aorus 17 YA
GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK
107 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 107, n=11)
59.9 fps ∼56% -44%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100105110Tooltip
Aorus 17 YA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9980HK, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø97 (89-104)
lage gem. hoge ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 200 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 95.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 152.8 144.7 140.7 133.8 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 107 fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
42 / 44 / 52 dB (A)
Belasting
56 / 64 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.536.836.534.832.42546.644.944.940.543.53140.435.336.935.234.54041.636.139.633.1375046.149.640.439.946.56346.839.834.732.838.18041.140.139.627.155.9100424240.823.746.112540.536.933.224.439.816038.137.230.725.4402003733.729.523.441.525039.335.429.322.143.63154237.731.1214740043.640.832.619.349.450044.14132.618.950.263044.139.531.32050.880043.640.432.617.951100044.441.234.418.951.4125044.741.63318.552.3160045.241.732.318.252.3200046.1423417.453.4250046.343.13017.354.2315046.54126.617.453.5400043.337.825.117.553.5500039.333.221.117.550.1630034.628.420.417.546.1800030.124.31817.543.610000272117.817.540.61250024.319.217.817.338.91600021.31817.817.234.4SPL55.851.942.530.363.6N10.784.11.418.1median 42median 37.8median 30.7median 18.2median 49.4Delta5.154.61.65.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAorus 17 YA
Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
20%
15%
20%
25%
23%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.2
6%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=338)
2%
Idle Minimum *
42
33
21%
30
29%
31
26%
28.2
33%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=761)
25%
Idle Average *
44
34
23%
34
23%
32
27%
28.2
36%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=761)
26%
Idle Maximum *
52
35
33%
45
13%
38
27%
30.8
41%
34.6 (28 - 52, n=761)
33%
Load Average *
56
38
32%
40
29%
47
16%
42
25%
40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=762)
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
60
50
17%
57
5%
48
20%
51
15%
Load Maximum *
64
54
16%
60
6%
49
23%
53
17%
48.2 (38.9 - 64.1, n=762)
25%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 44 °C38 °C46 °C 
 32 °C34 °C41 °C 
 32 °C32 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 46 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.6 °C
49 °C46 °C45 °C
46 °C45 °C41 °C
32 °C31 °C30 °C
Maximum: 49 °C
Gemiddelde: 40.6 °C
Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-6%
-3%
-19%
2%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
46
46
-0%
37
20%
55
-20%
43
7%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=726)
-0%
Maximum Bottom *
49
49
-0%
40
18%
65
-33%
47.2
4%
49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=724)
-1%
Idle Upper Side *
28
31
-11%
34
-21%
30
-7%
27.2
3%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=678)
-10%
Idle Bottom *
28
32
-14%
36
-29%
32
-14%
30
-7%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=676)
-14%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.835.42540.5443135.235.94033.139.55039.941.86332.8368027.140.310023.741.812524.437.416025.436.820023.438.725022.150.53152153.840019.358.950018.964.56302069.980017.968.6100018.964.1125018.562.3160018.261.2200017.459.7250017.359.9315017.466.4400017.561.8500017.560.6630017.555.1800017.5581000017.557.81250017.3521600017.244.8SPL30.375.4N1.435.7median 18.2median 58.9Delta1.65.843.64438.140.737.939.338.939.537.336.336.836.435.337.234.242.933.148.433.558.332.962.331.467.831.171.43170.130.271.629.472.629.175.728.773.828.175.327.974.627.671.127.667.727.463.127.466.327.170.927.271.127.164.32759.226.956.726.954.640.283.63.960.4median 28.1median 67.81.95.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus 17 YARazer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Aorus 17 YA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.63 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 2 / 3 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 34 / 37 / 41 Watt
Belasting midlight 123 / 386 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
7%
9%
42%
38%
34%
Idle Minimum *
34
34.2
-1%
27
21%
28
18%
13
62%
16.2
52%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=722)
43%
Idle Average *
37
37.2
-1%
32
14%
34
8%
17
54%
20.4
45%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=722)
33%
Idle Maximum *
41
50
-22%
39
5%
45
-10%
25
39%
26.1
36%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=722)
26%
Load Average *
123
106.1
14%
124
-1%
98
20%
96
22%
96.5
22%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=713)
15%
Load Maximum *
386
223.6
42%
338
12%
307
20%
239
38%
214.3
44%
173 (21.9 - 590, n=712)
55%
Witcher 3 ultra *
250
178.7
29%
274
-10%
263
-5%
156
38%
182.9
27%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 55min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 51min
Aorus 17 YA
9980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus ROG G703GXR
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 96 Wh
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 72 Wh
MSI GS75 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
-5%
6%
-36%
10%
-2%
-10%
Reader / Idle
484
213
461
295
349 (39 - 1174, n=681)
WiFi v1.3
235
223
-5%
367
56%
168
-29%
357
52%
280
19%
259 (78 - 622, n=387)
10%
Load
111
61
-45%
63
-43%
74
-33%
86
-23%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=648)
-29%
H.264
410
257 (88 - 508, n=149)

Pro

+ zeer goede CPU en GPU prestaties
+ veel onderhoudsmogelijkheden
+ mechanisch toetsenbord

Contra

- extreem luid
- groot en zwaar
- heeft twee stroomadapter nodig

Samenvatting - Sterke prestaties ten koste van stilte

Aorus 17 YA. Testmodel geleverd door Gigabyte Germany.
Aorus 17 YA. Testmodel geleverd door Gigabyte Germany.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

In onze tests laat de Aorus 17 YA zich zien zoals hij is: een gaming-laptop voor gepassioneerde gamers. De hardware is in staat om huidige games soepel en zonder problemen op het Full-HD-beeldscherm te draaien, en de bijbehorende reserve aan rekenkracht maakt de notebook ook toekomstbestendig. De CPU kan zijn volledige prestaties gebruiken en er zijn ook nauwelijks beperkingen voor de grafische kaart. Gebruikers kunnen het gedrag van de notebook sterk beïnvloeden met behulp van de ventilatorbesturing in het Control Center, wat een hoge flexibiliteit garandeert. Daarnaast zijn er uitstekende onderhoudsopties, een beeldscherm dat bij aflevering al goed is gekalibreerd en voldoende aansluitapparatuur.

Dankzij de goede koeling kan de hardware zijn volledige prestaties in de Aorus 17 YA gebruiken. Het ventilatorgeluid blijkt echter extreem luid te zijn.

Een krachtig koelsysteem maakt eersteklas prestaties mogelijk, maar dit leidt ook tot de grootste klacht over de Aorus 17 YA. Hoewel het hoge stroomverbruik te verwachten is van een notebook met dit type hardware, is het volume van het ventilatorgeluid extreem hoog, zelfs voor een gaming-notebook. Degenen die de volledige prestaties eisen, zullen alleen blij zijn met het dragen van een hoofdtelefoon en zullen nog steeds andere mensen irriteren die zich in dezelfde ruimte kunnen bevinden. Afgezien daarvan krijgen kopers een echt hoogwaardige gaming-notebook die zelfs een mechanisch toetsenbord biedt.

Aorus 17 YA - 04-12-2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
81 / 98 → 83%
Toetsenbord
85%
Aanwijsapparaat
83%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
71 / 80 → 89%
Gewicht
51 / 10-66 → 73%
Batterij
57 / 95 → 60%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
95%
Applicatie-performance
96%
Temperatuur
88 / 95 → 93%
Luidheid
22 / 90 → 24%
Audio
68%
Camera
33 / 85 → 39%
Gemiddelde
71%
82%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Aorus 17 YA Gaming Laptop: Extreme prestaties, extreem geluid
Mike Wobker, 2019-12- 6 (Update: 2019-12- 6)