Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Asus FX550IU (FX-9830P, Radeon RX 460) Laptop

Allen Ngo (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 18-09-2017

Zwanenzang van Bristol Ridge. Wat één van de laatste Bristol Ridge-gamingtoestellen van 2017 zou moeten zijn, voordat Ryzen zich op de mobiele markt stort, toont aan waarom AMD-notebooks zo'n mislukking zijn geweest. Een ouderwetse, plastic behuizing, goedkoop TN-paneel en zwakke CPU-prestaties bewijzen de Polaris-GPU niet bepaald een gunst.

Asus FX550IU-WSFX (FX Serie)
Processor
Grafische kaart
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop) - 4096 MB, Core: 1180 MHz, Geheugen: 1250 MHz, GDDR5, 21.19.128.4
Geheugen
8192 MB 
, 1200 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel, gesoldeerd
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, ID: AUO38ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
AMD CZ FCH
Opslag
SK Hynix HFS128G32TND, 128 GB 
, Secundair: 1 TB Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Geluidskaart
AMD Kabini - High Definition Audio Controller
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD-lezer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (ac), Bluetooth 4.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 31.8 x 380 x 251
Batterij
44 Wh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 4-cell
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: nee, AC-voeding, Crimson, Asus Smart Gesture, 12 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.45 kg, Voeding: 499 g
Prijs
700 USD

 

Voor: SD-kaartlezer
Voor: SD-kaartlezer
Links: AC-voeding, VGA-out, HDMI, Gigabit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset
Links: AC-voeding, VGA-out, HDMI, Gigabit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset
Achter: verwijderbare batterij
Achter: verwijderbare batterij
Rechts: USB 2.0, Kensington-Lock
Rechts: USB 2.0, Kensington-Lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
168 MB/s ∼100% +527%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
26.8 MB/s ∼16%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
22.2 MB/s ∼13% -17%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus G701VIK-BA049T
246 MB/s ∼100% +747%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
29.04 MB/s ∼12%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
27.2 MB/s ∼11% -6%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
648 MBit/s ∼100% +89%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
343 MBit/s ∼53%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
240 MBit/s ∼37% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
529 MBit/s ∼100% +139%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
319 MBit/s ∼60% +44%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
221 MBit/s ∼42%
230.1
cd/m²
226.4
cd/m²
232
cd/m²
205
cd/m²
231.9
cd/m²
212
cd/m²
207.8
cd/m²
221.2
cd/m²
218.8
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Maximum: 232 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 220.6 cd/m² Minimum: 10.84 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 88 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 231.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 515:1 (Zwart: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 12 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 14 | - Ø
54.8% sRGB (Argyll) 34.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.09
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
ID: AUO38ED, Name: AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
CMN15E8 (N156HCE-EN1), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, TN, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
1%
-12%
12%
-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.2 (21.2, 18)
38.8 (20.4, 18.4)
1%
36 (17, 19)
8%
32 (16.4, 15.6)
18%
43.2 (21.2, 22)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
27.2 (22.8, 4.4)
27.2 (14.8, 12.4)
-0%
36 (19, 17)
-32%
25.6 (15.6, 10)
6%
31.2 (16.4, 14.8)
-15%
PWM Frequency
25910 (20)
20000 (99)
Screen
59%
-5%
25%
61%
Brightness
221
313
42%
235
6%
241
9%
289
31%
Brightness Distribution
88
83
-6%
75
-15%
84
-5%
86
-2%
Black Level *
0.45
0.27
40%
0.55
-22%
0.3
33%
0.26
42%
Contrast
515
1241
141%
447
-13%
828
61%
1169
127%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
12
4.7
61%
10.97
9%
7.5
37%
3.46
71%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
14
5.8
59%
14.25
-2%
6.5
54%
2.46
82%
Gamma
2.09 115%
2.06 117%
1.83 131%
2.19 110%
2.38 101%
CCT
16348 40%
6518 100%
11200 58%
7852 83%
6915 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
34.8
58.7
69%
35
1%
37
6%
59
70%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
54.8
90.1
64%
55
0%
57.9
6%
91
66%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
30% / 47%
-9% / -6%
19% / 23%
24% / 46%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
27.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 22.8 ms stijging
↘ 4.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (26.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
39.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 21.2 ms stijging
↘ 18 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (42.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 57 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 6668 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼78% +63%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
145 Points ∼74% +56%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
133 Points ∼68% +43%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
132 Points ∼68% +42%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
123 Points ∼63% +32%
Medion Akoya E6422
Intel Core i3-6100U
97 Points ∼50% +4%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
93 Points ∼48%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
86 Points ∼44% -8%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
72 Points ∼37% -23%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
69 Points ∼35% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼34% +145%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
543 Points ∼25% +80%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
538 (min: 467.61) Points ∼25% +79%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
503 Points ∼23% +67%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
464 Points ∼22% +54%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points ∼15% +9%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
301 Points ∼14%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
256 Points ∼12% -15%
Medion Akoya E6422
Intel Core i3-6100U
247 Points ∼11% -18%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
230 Points ∼11% -24%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
229 Points ∼11% -24%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.73 Points ∼78% +57%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
1.6 Points ∼72% +45%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
1.51 Points ∼68% +37%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
1.49 Points ∼67% +35%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.45 Points ∼66% +32%
Medion Akoya E6422
Intel Core i3-6100U
1.1 Points ∼50% 0%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
1.1 Points ∼50%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
1.03 Points ∼47% -6%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
0.94 Points ∼43% -15%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
0.81 Points ∼37% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.14 Points ∼34% +124%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
6.11 Points ∼26% +68%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
5.81 Points ∼24% +60%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
5.32 Points ∼22% +46%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.67 Points ∼15% +1%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
3.64 Points ∼15%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
2.85 Points ∼12% -22%
Medion Akoya E6422
Intel Core i3-6100U
2.75 Points ∼12% -24%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
2.7 Points ∼11% -26%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
2.66 Points ∼11% -27%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5877 Points ∼66% +94%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
5545 Points ∼63% +83%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
4975 Points ∼56% +64%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
4920 Points ∼55% +62%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
4815 Points ∼54% +59%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
3871 Points ∼44% +28%
Medion Akoya E6422
Intel Core i3-6100U
3714 Points ∼42% +22%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
3033 Points ∼34%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
2640 Points ∼30% -13%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
2277 Points ∼26% -25%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21824 Points ∼44% +122%
Acer Aspire V17 Nitro BE VN7-793G-52XN
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
17618 Points ∼35% +79%
HP Omen 17-w100ng
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
16456 Points ∼33% +68%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
14148 Points ∼28% +44%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
11373 Points ∼23% +16%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
9822 Points ∼20%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
8718 Points ∼18% -11%
Medion Akoya E6422
Intel Core i3-6100U
8413 Points ∼17% -14%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
7420 Points ∼15% -24%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
7200 Points ∼14% -27%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Medion Akoya E6422
Intel Core i3-6100U
656.927 s * ∼8% -108%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
644.6 s * ∼8% -104%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
489.402 s * ∼6% -55%
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
470.94 s * ∼6% -49%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
415.484 s * ∼5% -32%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
315.907 s * ∼4%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
314.7 s * ∼4% -0%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
225.617 s * ∼3% +29%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
AMD A10-9620P
977.05 Seconds * ∼4% -12%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD FX-9830P
870.396 Seconds * ∼4%
HP Pavilion 17z 1EX13AV
AMD A12-9720P
863.551 Seconds * ∼4% +1%
Medion Akoya E6422
Intel Core i3-6100U
837.557 Seconds * ∼4% +4%
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS
Intel Core i3-7100U
817.6 Seconds * ∼4% +6%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US
Intel Core i5-7200U
627.687 Seconds * ∼3% +28%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-52N-566U
Intel Core i5-8250U
611 Seconds * ∼3% +30%
Eurocom Q5
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
561.342 Seconds * ∼2% +36%

* ... kleiner is beter

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6157
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
9822
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
3033
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
42.05 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.1 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
93 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
57.24 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
301 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5348 Points ∼82% +26%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
5068 Points ∼78% +19%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
5063 Points ∼78% +19%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
5040 Points ∼77% +18%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
4260 Points ∼65%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4858 Points ∼81% +44%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
3850 Points ∼64% +14%
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
3832 Points ∼64% +13%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
3431 Points ∼57% +1%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
3384 Points ∼57%
PCMark 10
Essentials
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
8191 Points ∼87% +51%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
7542 Points ∼80% +39%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
5417 Points ∼58%
Score
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4861 Points ∼74% +87%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
4364 Points ∼66% +68%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
2603 Points ∼40%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3384 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4640 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4260 punten
Help
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
Liteonit CV3-8D128
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
Hynix HFS128G39TND
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
AS SSD
76%
79%
20%
247%
Copy Game MB/s
110.59
286.18
159%
323.54
193%
442.81
300%
Copy Program MB/s
70.78
224.01
216%
195.3
176%
326.34
361%
Copy ISO MB/s
150.75
425.43
182%
446.8
196%
1128.09
648%
Score Total
587
734
25%
752
28%
798
36%
1829
212%
Score Write
177
227
28%
234
32%
175
-1%
600
239%
Score Read
278
332
19%
337
21%
419
51%
849
205%
Access Time Write *
0.27
0.057
79%
0.073
73%
0.273
-1%
0.034
87%
Access Time Read *
0.145
0.094
35%
0.141
3%
0.119
18%
0.079
46%
4K-64 Write
114.47
118.34
3%
132.19
15%
97.01
-15%
428.18
274%
4K-64 Read
208.73
258.63
24%
257.03
23%
342.15
64%
628.03
201%
4K Write
50.56
66.58
32%
53.75
6%
65.47
29%
112.04
122%
4K Read
22.09
25.16
14%
28.3
28%
26.34
19%
35.84
62%
Seq Write
120.13
416.13
246%
479.79
299%
129.15
8%
601
400%
Seq Read
468.46
481.62
3%
515.92
10%
502.61
7%
1847.57
294%

* ... kleiner is beter

SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
Sequential Read: 468.46 MB/s
Sequential Write: 120.13 MB/s
4K Read: 22.09 MB/s
4K Write: 50.56 MB/s
4K-64 Read: 208.73 MB/s
4K-64 Write: 114.47 MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.145 ms
Access Time Write: 0.27 ms
Copy ISO: 150.75 MB/s
Copy Program: 70.78 MB/s
Copy Game: 110.59 MB/s
Score Read: 278 Points
Score Write: 177 Points
Score Total: 587 Points
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K
12186 Points ∼30% +141%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6166 Points ∼15% +22%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
5863 Points ∼14% +16%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
5701 Points ∼14% +13%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
5062 Points ∼12%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -18%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7200U
3576 Points ∼9% -29%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
3574 Points ∼9% -29%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1593 Points ∼4% -69%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K
72213 Points ∼44% +131%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
39507 Points ∼24% +26%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
34892 Points ∼21% +11%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
34679 Points ∼21% +11%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
31294 Points ∼19%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
25986 Points ∼16% -17%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
22439 Points ∼14% -28%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7200U
19333 Points ∼12% -38%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
8385 Points ∼5% -73%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K
10801 Points ∼68% +294%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
8447 Points ∼53% +208%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
7182 Points ∼45% +162%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
6707 Points ∼42% +145%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼28% +63%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7200U
4156 Points ∼26% +52%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4113 Points ∼26% +50%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
2742 Points ∼17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
1770 Points ∼11% -35%
1280x720 Performance GPU
AMD Radeon RX 480 8 GB Reference
AMD Radeon RX 480 (Desktop), 4790K
17919 Points ∼35% +130%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K
8597 Points ∼17% +10%
HP Omen 17-w010ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
7903 Points ∼16% +1%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P
7794 Points ∼15%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ
7731 Points ∼15% -1%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -38%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (Laptop GT 1030), 7200U
4575 Points ∼9% -41%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U
4251 Points ∼8% -45%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 7500U
2230 Points ∼4% -71%
3DMark 11 Performance
5537 punten
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
60282 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9968 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3962 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2148 punten
Help
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
61 fps ∼100% +47%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K, Intel SSD 530 Series SSDSC2BW240A
55.3 fps ∼91% +34%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
52.4 fps ∼86% +27%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
49.9 fps ∼82% +21%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
41.4 fps ∼68%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
35 fps ∼57% -15%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
30.2 fps ∼50% -27%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
GeForce 940MX, 7500U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
13.5 fps ∼22% -67%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7360U
12.5 fps ∼20% -70%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
34.2 fps ∼100% +74%
Gigabyte P55K v5
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
28.3 fps ∼83% +44%
XFX RX-460P4DFG5 Double Dissipation 4 GB
Radeon RX 460 (Desktop), 4790K, Intel SSD 530 Series SSDSC2BW240A
27.9 (min: 24) fps ∼82% +42%
MSI GL72 6QF
GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 256GB m.2 NVMe
25.6 fps ∼75% +30%
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
19.7 fps ∼58%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-51RL
GeForce MX150, 7200U
17.2 fps ∼50% -13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
GeForce GTX 950M, 7200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
16.9 fps ∼49% -14%
lage gem. hoge ultra
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) 175.348.7fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 9641.4fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 42.629.5fps
Thief (2014) 24.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 71.729.617.2fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 4335fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 55.432.327.7fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 61.528.419.7fps
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 24.221fps
Overwatch (2016) 10079.743fps
Prey (2017) 57.549.236.430.3fps
Dirt 4 (2017) 95.460.739.622.4fps
F1 2017 (2017) 37272420fps
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435Tooltip
The Witcher 3 high

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30.2 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB (A)
Belasting
41.6 / 45.3 dB (A)
 
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), FX-9830P, SK Hynix HFS128G32TND
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Hynix HFS128G39TND
Noise
-5%
-10%
-6%
-8%
off / environment *
28.2
30.3
-7%
28.2
-0%
30
-6%
30.8
-9%
Idle Minimum *
30.2
30.9
-2%
33
-9%
30
1%
32.9
-9%
Idle Average *
30.3
30.9
-2%
33.3
-10%
33
-9%
32.9
-9%
Idle Maximum *
30.3
31
-2%
34.7
-15%
37
-22%
33.5
-11%
Load Average *
41.6
46.5
-12%
44.5
-7%
41
1%
43.7
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
43.7
49.2
-13%
42
4%
46.2
-6%
Load Maximum *
45.3
46.8
-3%
52.8
-17%
50
-10%
47
-4%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 37.8 °C41.2 °C28.4 °C 
 41.8 °C46.2 °C29.8 °C 
 30.8 °C35.8 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 46.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 36.2 °C
27 °C40.2 °C51.2 °C
28.2 °C42.6 °C44 °C
32.6 °C30 °C27 °C
Maximum: 51.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  50 °C | Kamertemperatuur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.335.12532.931.83131.8324036.535.15032.428.9633328.98036.328.810048.32712561.52716052.924.820060.92425062.822.731563.32240069.521.250067.82163074.82080075.919.4100072.718.912507117.7160070.117.820006917.6250071.817.6315068.117.6400071.417.6500073.717.6630070.417.5800071.617.61000071.617.61250069.617.41600059.717.5SPL83.630.6N62.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.8Delta4.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.233 / 0.437 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 5.9 / 8.8 / 9.7 Watt
Belasting midlight 78.1 / 117 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
FX-9830P, Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), SK Hynix HFS128G32TND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567 Gaming (Core i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050)
7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Hynix HFS128G39TND, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
6500U, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-13%
-56%
-101%
14%
9%
Idle Minimum *
5.9
9.1
-54%
14.6
-147%
18
-205%
4
32%
5
15%
Idle Average *
8.8
10.3
-17%
17.2
-95%
23
-161%
6.7
24%
8.9
-1%
Idle Maximum *
9.7
13
-34%
17.3
-78%
30
-209%
9.6
1%
11.8
-22%
Load Average *
78.1
75.6
3%
82.7
-6%
85
-9%
81
-4%
55
30%
Load Maximum *
117
115.2
2%
136.7
-17%
158
-35%
107
9%
93
21%
Witcher 3 ultra *
112.4
83.8
25%
107
5%
96
15%
90
20%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
9h 05min
Surfen met WLAN v1.3
4h 07min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
0h 53min
Asus FX550IU-WSFX
FX-9830P, Radeon RX 460 (Laptop), 44 Wh
Asus ZenBook Pro UX550VD
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 73 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 74 Wh
Gigabyte Sabre 15G
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 47 Wh
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus FX553VD-DM249T
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 48 Wh
Batterijduur
81%
107%
14%
-7%
20%
Reader / Idle
545
1061
95%
1174
115%
493
-10%
256
-53%
587
8%
WiFi v1.3
247
535
117%
622
152%
261
6%
198
-20%
360
46%
Load
53
70
32%
81
53%
77
45%
80
51%
56
6%
Witcher 3 ultra
68

Pro

+ over het algemeen stabiele CPU-prestaties
+ toegankelijke HDD- en RAM-sleuf
+ snelle zwart-wit-responstijd
+ 2x opslagapparaten; VGA-output
+ verwijderbare Li-Ion-batterij
+ relatief goedkoop
+ stevige toetsen

Contra

- erg zwakke grijswaarden vóór kalibratie; lage helderheid
- ondermaats TN-paneel; matig contrast; slechte kleurweergave
- plastic behuizing voelt goedkoop aan; ouderwets design
- weinig indrukwekkende performance per Watt
- erg lage CPU-prestaties
- toetsenbord warmt sterk op onder belasting
- zwakke batterijduur
- SD-sleuf moeilijk te bereiken
- geen toetsenbordverlichting
- problemen met software-drivers
- goedkope, glanzende schermbehuizing
- zachte numpad-toetsen
- luide toetsaanslag
Onder de loep: Asus FX550IU
Onder de loep: Asus FX550IU

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De FX550UI heeft te lijden onder heel wat gelijkaardige problemen als de oudere AMD-gebaseerde gamingtoestellen. In dit geval vormt de trage FX-9830P APU een flessenhals voor de anders degelijke RX 460-GPU en de prestaties per Watt lopen heel wat achter ten opzichte van het aanbod van Nvidia. Energieverbruik is vergelijkbaar met de concurrerende notebooks met veel krachtigere Intel-CPU's van de HQ-klasse en GTX 1050 grafische kaart. De FX550UI is dus niet noodzakelijk koeler of stiller dan een alternatief met Intel/Nvidia, ondanks de lagere prestaties.

De ongeschikte combinatie van Bristol Ridge en Polaris 11 is niet het enige probleem. Het feit dat de FX550UI een gerecycleerde versie is van de veel oudere FX550DM, zorgt ervoor dat de hele notebook meer als een extra, weinig uitgedacht product beschouwd kan worden. Het TN-scherm is ondermaats en AMD verdient ongetwijfeld betere hardware van Asus, zoals gedemonstreerd in de UX550 of ROG Strix G501-serie. We stellen vast dat er stilaan meer wordt geïnvesteerd in AMD-notebooks nu de GL702ZC verkrijgbaar is en hopen dat dit in de toekomst ook het geval zal worden voor meer mainstream producten met AMD-hardware.

De prijs blijft het grootste voordeel van de FX550UI in vergelijking met Nvidia-alternatieven. Met 700 euro is de Asus zo'n 200 tot 300 euro goedkoper dan een Pavilion 15 of Sabre 15 met i7-7700HQ en GTX 1050 grafische kaart. Wie liever in een mainstream Nvidia-systeem investeert, zal bediend worden door veel hogere prestaties dan de FX550UI, zeker op het vlak van CPU-prestaties.

Het is moeilijk om de FX550UI aan te bevelen door zijn goedkope, plastic behuizing, trage processor en zwakke TN-scherm. Gamers met een beperkt budget, doen er goed aan een paar honderd euro meer uit te geven aan een nieuwere GTX 1050-notebook of een oudere en goedkopere notebook met GTX 965M.

Asus FX550IU-WSFX - 16-09-2017 v6
Allen Ngo

Behuizing
65 / 98 → 66%
Toetsenbord
68%
Aanwijsapparaat
78%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
43 / 81 → 53%
Gewicht
60 / 66 → 89%
Batterij
76%
Beeldscherm
77%
Gaming-performance
77%
Applicatie-performance
77%
Temperatuur
86 / 95 → 90%
Luidheid
85 / 90 → 94%
Audio
50%
Camera
34 / 85 → 40%
Gemiddelde
67%
72%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Asus FX550IU (FX-9830P, Radeon RX 460) Laptop
Allen Ngo, 2017-09-18 (Update: 2017-09-18)