Kort testrapport Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Smartphone: veel features voor een lage prijs

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Redmi Note Serie)

ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro: 41.94 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 64.93 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.nl/Kort-testrapport-Xiaomi-Redmi-Note-9-Pro-Smartphone-veel-features-voor-een-lage-prijs.477627.0.html">Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro</a> — Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro


575 cd/m²	610 cd/m²	578 cd/m²
563 cd/m²	610 cd/m²	567 cd/m²
559 cd/m²	578 cd/m²	567 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 610 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 578.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.25 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 610 cd/m²
Contrast: 1649:1 (Zwart: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.31

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Samsung Galaxy A51 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.53	realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6	Oppo A91 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4	Huawei P40 Lite IPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
Screen		-34%	-65%	-86%	-112%	-43%
Brightness middle	610	589 -3%	669 10%	442 -28%	594 -3%	478 -22%
Brightness	579	589 2%	630 9%	419 -28%	613 6%	448 -23%
Brightness Distribution	92	94 2%	87 -5%	90 -2%	89 -3%	87 -5%
Black Level *	0.37		0.42 -14%	0.37 -0%		0.49 -32%
Contrast	1649		1593 -3%	1195 -28%		976 -41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	1.8	2.22 -23%	4.8 -167%	6.1 -239%	6.1 -239%	3 -67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	3	8.24 -175%	9 -200%	9.7 -223%	10.6 -253%	5.6 -87%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.5	2.6 -4%	6.2 -148%	5.9 -136%	7 -180%	4.1 -64%
Gamma	2.31 ^95%	2.111 ^104%	2.24 ^98%	2.35 ^94%	2.28 ^96%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6864 ^95%	6508 ^100%	7846 ^83%	7631 ^85%	7370 ^88%	7282 ^89%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen

2404 Hz

≤ 43 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2404 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 43 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 2404 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17507 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
25.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 10.8 ms stijging
25.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 14.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
44.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 20.4 ms stijging
44.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 24.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	982 Points ∼59%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1063 Points ∼64% +8%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1337 Points ∼80% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (982 - 1063, n=3)	1017 Points ∼61% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 4043, n=67)	1668 Points ∼100% +70%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1163 Points ∼47%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1201 Points ∼48% +3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1338 Points ∼54% +15%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2493 Points ∼100% +114%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1163 - 1201, n=3)	1179 Points ∼47% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (272 - 4739, n=62)	1789 Points ∼72% +54%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1771 Points ∼91%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1759 Points ∼90% -1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1475 Points ∼76% -17%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1430 Points ∼73% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	1949 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1690 - 1771, n=3)	1740 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (421 - 3531, n=123)	1947 Points ∼100% +10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	569 Points ∼94%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	567 Points ∼94% 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	320 Points ∼53% -44%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	282 Points ∼47% -50%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	604 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (559 - 569, n=3)	565 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 1342, n=123)	553 Points ∼92% -3%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	7829 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5649 Points ∼56% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	9967 Points ∼99% +27%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	10106 Points ∼100% +29%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8185 Points ∼81% +5%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	9164 Points ∼91% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (7673 - 10106, n=3)	8536 Points ∼84% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 15299, n=526)	5979 Points ∼59% -24%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	9091 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	6416 Points ∼43% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14946 Points ∼100% +64%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	13777 Points ∼92% +52%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	12070 Points ∼81% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (9027 - 13777, n=3)	10632 Points ∼71% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=684)	6564 Points ∼44% -28%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2721 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2161 Points ∼73% -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2543 Points ∼85% -7%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2562 Points ∼86% -6%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2304 Points ∼77% -15%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2977 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2562 - 2765, n=3)	2683 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1740 - 4061, n=177)	2666 Points ∼90% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2250 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1438 Points ∼47% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1978 Points ∼64% -12%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2255 Points ∼73% 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1103 Points ∼36% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2552 Points ∼83% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2250 - 2257, n=3)	2254 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (203 - 9104, n=177)	3074 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2340 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1554 Points ∼57% -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2087 Points ∼76% -11%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2317 Points ∼85% -1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1248 Points ∼46% -47%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2636 Points ∼96% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2317 - 2353, n=3)	2337 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (253 - 6977, n=177)	2733 Points ∼100% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3236 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2311 Points ∼58% -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3326 Points ∼84% +3%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3067 Points ∼77% -5%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2621 Points ∼66% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3972 Points ∼100% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3067 - 3256, n=3)	3186 Points ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5780, n=529)	2232 Points ∼56% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2539 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1530 Points ∼56% -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2322 Points ∼84% -9%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2558 Points ∼93% +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1102 Points ∼40% -57%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2752 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2539 - 2558, n=3)	2549 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 10043, n=529)	2170 Points ∼79% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2667 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1654 Points ∼56% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points ∼82% -10%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2656 Points ∼90% 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1265 Points ∼43% -53%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2954 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2656 - 2680, n=3)	2668 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 8386, n=530)	2023 Points ∼68% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3226 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2336 Points ∼58% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3362 Points ∼84% +4%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3125 Points ∼78% -3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2606 Points ∼65% -19%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4003 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3125 - 3267, n=3)	3206 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5765, n=561)	2148 Points ∼54% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3785 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1993 Points ∼52% -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2323 Points ∼61% -39%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3835 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1747 Points ∼46% -54%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3488 Points ∼91% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3785 - 3835, n=3)	3808 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 20154, n=561)	2922 Points ∼76% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3645 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2060 Points ∼56% -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2412 Points ∼66% -34%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3651 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1885 Points ∼52% -48%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3591 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3645 - 3669, n=3)	3655 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 10699, n=561)	2451 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3170 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2217 Points ∼60% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3280 Points ∼89% +3%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3083 Points ∼84% -3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2550 Points ∼69% -20%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3676 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3083 - 3170, n=3)	3135 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5209, n=610)	2110 Points ∼57% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2356 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1473 Points ∼54% -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2218 Points ∼81% -6%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2388 Points ∼87% +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1117 Points ∼41% -53%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2740 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2356 - 2388, n=3)	2371 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 9167, n=610)	1830 Points ∼67% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2499 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1592 Points ∼55% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points ∼82% -4%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	2514 Points ∼87% +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1276 Points ∼44% -49%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	2904 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2499 - 2514, n=3)	2507 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 7678, n=611)	1740 Points ∼60% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3263 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2225 Points ∼61% -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3267 Points ∼90% 0%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3076 Points ∼85% -6%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2568 Points ∼71% -21%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3638 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3070 - 3263, n=3)	3136 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5274, n=653)	1980 Points ∼54% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3620 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2027 Points ∼55% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2219 Points ∼60% -39%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3683 Points ∼100% +2%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1767 Points ∼48% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3384 Points ∼92% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3620 - 3683, n=3)	3650 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 13305, n=652)	2426 Points ∼66% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3534 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2068 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	2390 Points ∼68% -32%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3528 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	1899 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3437 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3501 - 3534, n=3)	3521 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 9611, n=655)	2078 Points ∼59% -41%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20054 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	20393 Points ∼74% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	22928 Points ∼83% +14%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	14849 Points ∼54% -26%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	24514 Points ∼89% +22%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	27654 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (14849 - 20054, n=3)	18307 Points ∼66% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 58293, n=797)	15595 Points ∼56% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	51789 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	25086 Points ∼47% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	39137 Points ∼73% -24%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	53600 Points ∼100% +3%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23159 Points ∼43% -55%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	47563 Points ∼89% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (51789 - 53600, n=3)	52696 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 209431, n=795)	27325 Points ∼51% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38315 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23866 Points ∼58% -38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	33832 Points ∼83% -12%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	33926 Points ∼83% -11%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	23447 Points ∼57% -39%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	41003 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (33926 - 38671, n=3)	36971 Points ∼90% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 117606, n=795)	21222 Points ∼52% -45%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	85 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	46 fps ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	82 fps ∼92% -4%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	85 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	89 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (85 - 86, n=3)	85.3 fps ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=798)	46 fps ∼52% -46%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	40 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	58 fps ∼97% -3%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	59 fps ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (59 - 60, n=3)	59.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 138, n=807)	31.5 fps ∼53% -47%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	24 fps ∼45% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	49 fps ∼92% +20%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	41 fps ∼77% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	53 fps ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (41 - 42, n=3)	41.3 fps ∼78% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 175, n=703)	27.3 fps ∼52% -33%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	39 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps ∼44% -41%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	42 fps ∼81% +8%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	38 fps ∼73% -3%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	52 fps ∼100% +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (37 - 39, n=3)	38 fps ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 115, n=711)	22.8 fps ∼44% -42%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	15 fps ∼45% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	29 fps ∼88% -3%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	30 fps ∼91% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	33 fps ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (30 - 31, n=3)	30.3 fps ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=566)	21.9 fps ∼66% -27%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	29 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps ∼41% -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	26 fps ∼76% -10%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	27 fps ∼79% -7%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	34 fps ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (27 - 29, n=3)	27.7 fps ∼81% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=568)	19.8 fps ∼58% -32%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	11 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.5 fps ∼42% -50%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6.8 fps ∼52% -38%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	11 fps ∼85% 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	4.5 fps ∼35% -59%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	13 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (11 - 11, n=3)	11 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=322)	11.5 fps ∼88% +5%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6.9 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps ∼32% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	11 fps ∼100% +59%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	7 fps ∼64% +1%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	2.9 fps ∼26% -58%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	7.9 fps ∼72% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (6.9 - 7, n=3)	6.97 fps ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=320)	8.14 fps ∼74% +18%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.1 fps ∼43% -46%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	17 fps ∼81% 0%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	17 fps ∼81% 0%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	7.5 fps ∼36% -56%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	21 fps ∼100% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (17 - 17, n=3)	17 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=326)	17.1 fps ∼81% +1%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps ∼48% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	19 fps ∼90% +6%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	19 fps ∼90% +6%
Oppo A91 Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192	8.8 fps ∼42% -51%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	21 fps ∼100% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (18 - 19, n=2)	18.5 fps ∼88% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=325)	19.7 fps ∼94% +9%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps ∼53% -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	16 fps ∼84% -11%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	18 fps ∼95% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	19 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (18 - 18, n=3)	18 fps ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 73, n=491)	14.7 fps ∼77% -18%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.6 fps ∼43% -49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	14 fps ∼70% -18%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	16 fps ∼80% -6%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	20 fps ∼100% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (16 - 17, n=3)	16.3 fps ∼82% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=495)	13 fps ∼65% -24%

AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	271934 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	181295 Points ∼56% -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	282085 Points ∼87% +4%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	275464 Points ∼85% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	319383 Points ∼99% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (271934 - 275931, n=3)	274443 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (53335 - 622888, n=121)	322704 Points ∼100% +19%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1226 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 Points ∼1% -99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	1145 Points ∼89% -7%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	1233 Points ∼96% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	1267 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (1226 - 1410, n=3)	1290 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1745, n=737)	827 Points ∼64% -33%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3757 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2168 Points ∼50% -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3419 Points ∼79% -9%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3768 Points ∼87% 0%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4339 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3757 - 3807, n=3)	3777 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=737)	2554 Points ∼59% -32%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4452 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1605 Points ∼34% -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3609 Points ∼76% -19%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	4573 Points ∼97% +3%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	4726 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (4295 - 4573, n=3)	4440 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=737)	1901 Points ∼40% -57%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6856 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4738 Points ∼66% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	6155 Points ∼86% -10%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	6908 Points ∼96% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	7178 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (6828 - 6908, n=3)	6864 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=737)	3503 Points ∼49% -49%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3444 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A51 Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	634 Points ∼17% -82%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Mediatek Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4, 6144	3054 Points ∼83% -11%
realme 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192	3481 Points ∼94% +1%
Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810, Mali-G52 MP6, 6144	3695 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (3444 - 3542, n=3)	3489 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6273, n=737)	1792 Points ∼48% -48%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	55.352 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (47.9 - 48.5, n=2)	48.2 Points ∼87% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	47.901 Points ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=196)	40.9 Points ∼74% -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	35.298 Points ∼64% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	27.681 Points ∼50% -42%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	91.154 Points ∼100% +5%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	89.577 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (86.8 - 89.6, n=3)	88.6 Points ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	86.75 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	72.098 Points ∼79% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	51.257 Points ∼56% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=626)	47.7 Points ∼52% -45%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	53.2 runs/min ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	45.2 runs/min ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (44.1 - 45.2, n=2)	44.7 runs/min ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=177)	43 runs/min ∼81% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	41.6 runs/min ∼78% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	29.1 runs/min ∼55% -36%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	97 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	71 Points ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=264)	70 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (67 - 71, n=3)	69 Points ∼71% -3%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	67 Points ∼69% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	57 Points ∼59% -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	55 Points ∼57% -23%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	17925 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	17265 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (17157 - 17303, n=3)	17242 Points ∼96% 0%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	17157 Points ∼96% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	15606 Points ∼87% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	10194 Points ∼57% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=795)	7967 Points ∼44% -54%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=821)	9705 ms * ∼100% -241%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)	4375.1 ms * ∼45% -54%
realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83)	3033.1 ms * ∼31% -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro (Chrome 78)	3001.5 ms * ∼31% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (2794 - 3033, n=3)	2892 ms * ∼30% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99)	2850.1 ms * ∼29%
Huawei P40 Lite (Huawei Browser 10.1.0.300)	2471.6 ms * ∼25% +13%

* ... kleiner is beter

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro	Samsung Galaxy A51	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro	realme 6 Pro	Oppo A91	Huawei P40 Lite	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-1%	17%	19%	-6%	35%	-6%	-31%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	54.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 9%	57.33 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	63.43 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 15%	60.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 10%	70.6 (Nano Memory Card) 29%	55.4 (33.3 - 65.3, n=10) 1%	51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536) -7%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%	71.61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -7%	86.38 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%	77.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 1%	82.63 (Nano Memory Card) 8%	73.4 (36.8 - 85.4, n=10) -4%	69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536) -10%
Random Write 4KB	112.93	104.4 -8%	180.4 60%	154 36%	28.55 -75%	175.45 55%	78.1 (13.6 - 196, n=15) -31%	36.9 (0.14 - 319, n=893) -67%
Random Read 4KB	122.58	110.8 -10%	156.22 27%	158.66 29%	145.64 19%	157.32 28%	115 (60.6 - 157, n=15) -6%	60.1 (1.59 - 324, n=893) -51%
Sequential Write 256KB	171.09	184.9 8%	193.54 13%	203.28 19%	185.26 8%	181.69 6%	182 (135 - 222, n=15) 6%	131 (2.99 - 911, n=893) -23%
Sequential Read 256KB	498.15	496.1 0%	534.5 7%	512.61 3%	505.44 1%	912.99 83%	491 (272 - 687, n=15) -1%	347 (12.1 - 1802, n=893) -30%

; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.2.2a: Ø29.8 (21-31)

; PUBG Mobile; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (19-31)

Max. Belasting

Inactief


38.1 °C	38.4 °C	38.2 °C
38.2 °C	37.5 °C	37.7 °C
36.4 °C	36.6 °C	38.2 °C

Maximum: 38.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.7 °C


34.5 °C	34.7 °C	38.5 °C
33.9 °C	35 °C	37.5 °C
34.4 °C	35.2 °C	36.3 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.6 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 29.5 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.01 / 0.25 Watt
Inactief	0.75 / 2.19 / 2.24 Watt
Belasting	3.88 / 5.97 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Oppo A91 4025 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 4200 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-5%	-14%	-11%	15%	3%	-15%	0%
Idle Minimum *	0.75	0.9 -20%	0.79 -5%	0.92 -23%	0.82 -9%	0.79 -5%	1.057 (0.75 - 1.5, n=3) -41%	0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897) -19%
Idle Average *	2.19	1.7 22%	2.32 -6%	1.79 18%	1.73 21%	2.14 2%	2.03 (1.79 - 2.19, n=3) 7%	1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896) 20%
Idle Maximum *	2.24	1.8 20%	2.38 -6%	1.88 16%	1.75 22%	2.23 -0%	2.21 (1.88 - 2.5, n=3) 1%	2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897) 9%
Load Average *	3.88	5.2 -34%	4.72 -22%	5.41 -39%	2.33 40%	3.6 7%	4.83 (3.88 - 5.41, n=3) -24%	4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891) -6%
Load Maximum *	5.97	6.6 -11%	7.68 -29%	7.59 -27%	5.97 -0%	5.17 13%	7.02 (5.97 - 7.59, n=3) -18%	6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891) -2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		38h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		19h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 16min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		5h 03min

	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A51 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 4500 mAh	realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh	Oppo A91 4025 mAh	Huawei P40 Lite 4200 mAh
Batterijduur		-24%	-21%	-12%	-49%	-10%
Reader / Idle	2336	1689 -28%	1893 -19%			2154 -8%
H.264	1096	846 -23%	984 -10%			1176 7%
WiFi v1.3	1175	698 -41%	864 -26%	1031 -12%	605 -49%	1007 -14%
Load	303	289 -5%	212 -30%			228 -25%

Pro

+ waarde voor je geld

+ NFC

+ microSD & 2x dual SIM

+ snelle wifi

+ lage SAR-waarden

+ 33-watt lader

+ snelle systeemprestatie

+ geen throttling

+ zeer lange batterijlevensduur

Contra

- voorgeïnstalleerde bloatware

- foto's met een smal dynamisch bereik

- gamen beperkt tot 30 FPS

Getest: Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Testmodel met dank aan Xiaomi Germany

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Met de Redmi Note 9 Pro heeft Xiaomi weer een smartphone toegevoegd die uitblinkt met een geweldige prijs-prestatieverhouding.

Voor 250 euro (~282 dollar) biedt het veel: Een helder, 6,67-inch IPS-scherm, 6 GB RAM, 64 of 128 GB interne opslag, de snelle octa-core Snapdragon 720G SoC en een quad-camerasysteem met een resolutie van 64 MP. Dankzij de 5020-mAh batterij bereikt de Redmi Note 9 Pro uitstekende runtimes, de 33-watt voedingsadapter laadt de smartphone snel op en er zijn handige extra's zoals een grote kaartlade die tegelijkertijd een microSD en twee SIM-kaarten accepteert.

De Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro biedt veel waarde voor zijn geld, terwijl de lange batterijduur en extra functies zoals NFC hem doen opvallen.

De nadelen ervan zijn daarentegen gering en liggen ver uit elkaar. De 64-MP-camera is echter niet zo indrukwekkend als de specificaties doen vermoeden, omdat het uiteindelijk ontbreekt aan een dynamisch bereik. Daarentegen is het beperken van games tot 30 FPS niet zo'n groot probleem, vooral omdat ze zelden onder dit FPS-teken vallen. Hoewel de smartphone voorgeïnstalleerde reclamebloatware bevat, kunnen de respectievelijke apps worden verwijderd.

De release van deze smartphone kan kopers van de Redmi Note 9S met spijt vullen. Terwijl de Redmi Note 9 Pro fysiek bijna identiek is, biedt het verschillende high-end functies, waaronder een NFC-module voor een vrij kleine premie. Het upgraden van een Redmi Note 8 Pro is echter niet echt de moeite waard, omdat er slechts kleine gen-naar-gen verbeteringen zijn aangebracht.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro - 2020-06-2323-06-2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing

86%

Toetsenbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Aanwijsapparaat

96%

Aansluitmogelijkheden

50 / 70 → 72%

Gewicht

88%

Batterij

92%

Beeldscherm

89%

Gaming-performance

29 / 64 → 46%

Applicatie-performance

70 / 86 → 81%

Temperatuur

91%

Luidheid

100%

Audio

80 / 90 → 89%

Camera

65%

Gemiddelde

77%

83%

Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Linked Articles

Testrapport

•

Testrapport

•

Testrapport

•

Testrapport

•

Testrapport

•

Testrapport

•

Testrapport

•

Testrapport

•