Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A51 Smartphone: toegewijd aan succes

Een voorbeeldige mid-range telefoon. De Samsung Galaxy A51 is de opvolger van een van de meest succesvolle smartphones van 2019. Onze verwachtingen staan dus ook hoog gespannen - maar de concurrentie slaapt nooit. Lees verder om te weten te komen of de Galaxy-smartphone met zijn vijf camera's ook zijn mannetje kan staan.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (vertaald door Siemon Boes),
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Galaxy A50 Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.5 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, AMOLED, glimmend: ja, 60 Hz
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm audio-klink, Card Reader: microSD tot 512 GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: accelerometer, gyroscoop, afstandssensor, kompas, USB-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.9 x 158.5 x 73.6
Batterij
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​2.0, fasedetectie auto-focus, LED-flash, video's @2160p/​30fps (camera 1); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, groothoeklens (camera 2); 5.0MP, f/​2.2, scherptediepte (camera 3); 5.0MP, f/​2.4, macro-lens (camera 4)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono-luidspreker aan onderzijde, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, AC-snellader, USB-kabel, headset, SIM-tool, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waarde: 0.369W/​kg (hoofd), 1.59W/​kg (body); LTE-snelheid: 600 Mbit/s (download) en 150 Mbit/s (upload); FM-radio, fanless
Gewicht
172 g, Voeding: 55 g
Prijs
369 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
80 %
01-2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
80 %
04-2019
Samsung Galaxy A50
Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3
166 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
81 %
07-2019
Xiaomi Mi 9T
SD 730, Adreno 618
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
80 %
05-2019
Google Pixel 3a
SD 670, Adreno 616
147 g64 GB eMMC Flash5.6"2220x1080
84 %
10-2019
Huawei Nova 5T
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
174 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.26"2340x1080
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Galaxy A51
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
637 (min: 275, max: 679) MBit/s ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (min: 297, max: 343) MBit/s ∼52% +12%
Huawei Nova 5T
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
317 (min: 30, max: 340) MBit/s ∼50% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (min: 185, max: 350) MBit/s ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=553)
264 MBit/s ∼41% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Google Pixel 3a
Adreno 616, SD 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
541 (min: 422, max: 570) MBit/s ∼100% +82%
Huawei Nova 5T
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
315 (min: 226, max: 345) MBit/s ∼58% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (min: 189, max: 335) MBit/s ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (min: 161, max: 346) MBit/s ∼54% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼50% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=553)
250 MBit/s ∼46% -16%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø298 (185-350)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø297 (189-335)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bocht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bocht
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – brug
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – brug
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – overzicht
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – overzicht
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – bocht
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – bocht
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – brug
GPS Samsung Galaxy A51 – brug

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
27.8 ∆E
44.9 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
39 ∆E
52.7 ∆E
42 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
53 ∆E
51.6 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
39.7 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A51: 37.61 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 54.12 ∆E
ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy A51: 5.94 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 17.17 ∆E
Testbeeld – perfecte belichting
Test chart – perfect lighting
Testbeeld – 1 lux
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto groothoeklens
Foto groothoeklens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens – manuele helderheid
Foto standaardlens – automatische helderheid
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto groothoeklens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto standaardlens
Foto macro-lens
576
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
575
cd/m²
589
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 609 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 589.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 94 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 589 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.22 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.111
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Google Pixel 3a
P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6
Huawei Nova 5T
LTPS, 2340x1080, 6.26
Screen
-2%
11%
-33%
-88%
Brightness middle
589
644
9%
589
0%
403
-32%
524
-11%
Brightness
589
628
7%
589
0%
411
-30%
510
-13%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
96
2%
96
2%
86
-9%
Black Level *
0.39
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.22
2.64
-19%
2.5
-13%
5.1
-130%
6.6
-197%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.24
9.23
-12%
4.9
41%
11
-33%
12.2
-48%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
2.5
4%
1.6
38%
2
23%
9.1
-250%
Gamma
2.111 104%
2.024 109%
2.24 98%
2.22 99%
2.34 94%
CCT
6508 100%
6649 98%
6544 99%
6589 99%
8987 72%
Contrast
1344

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 242.7 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 242.7 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 242.7 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 50 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 18115 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
24 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 21 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (24.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
26 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 21 ms stijging
↘ 5 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1079 Points ∼49%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2203 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (663 - 1079, n=3)
932 Points ∼42% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=45)
1362 Points ∼62% +26%
OpenCL Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1522 Points ∼45%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3360 Points ∼100% +121%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1393 - 1522, n=3)
1451 Points ∼43% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=53)
1738 Points ∼52% +14%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1326 Points ∼52%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2549 Points ∼100% +92%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1063 - 1326, n=3)
1229 Points ∼48% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=65)
1821 Points ∼71% +37%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
347 Points ∼49%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
707 Points ∼100% +104%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (345 - 349, n=3)
347 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=65)
519 Points ∼73% +50%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼70% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼91% +33%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7387 Points ∼89% +31%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8279 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5351 - 5925, n=5)
5606 Points ∼68% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=480)
5766 Points ∼70% +2%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼69% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼89% +41%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
9458 Points ∼93% +47%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10209 Points ∼100% +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5886 - 6697, n=5)
6269 Points ∼61% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=638)
6307 Points ∼62% -2%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼82% +29%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3406 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2061 - 2163, n=5)
2119 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=140)
2631 Points ∼77% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼40% +33%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4853 Points ∼100% +237%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1320 - 1442, n=5)
1415 Points ∼29% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=140)
2894 Points ∼60% +101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼46% +33%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4434 Points ∼100% +185%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1442 - 1557, n=5)
1527 Points ∼34% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=140)
2605 Points ∼59% +68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼46% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼66% +40%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2763 Points ∼56% +20%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4917 Points ∼100% +113%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2058 - 2332, n=5)
2217 Points ∼45% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=486)
2148 Points ∼44% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼23% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼42% +42%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1611 Points ∼31% +5%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5157 Points ∼100% +237%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1267 - 1533, n=5)
1477 Points ∼29% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=486)
2032 Points ∼39% +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼26% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼46% +42%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1772 Points ∼35% +7%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5102 Points ∼100% +208%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1390 - 1659, n=5)
1594 Points ∼31% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=487)
1886 Points ∼37% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼45% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼66% +41%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2771 Points ∼55% +19%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4997 Points ∼100% +114%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2275 - 2336, n=4)
2301 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=516)
2058 Points ∼41% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼24% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼52% +66%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2533 Points ∼40% +27%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6350 Points ∼100% +219%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1634 - 2021, n=4)
1910 Points ∼30% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=516)
2703 Points ∼43% +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼28% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼55% +61%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2582 Points ∼43% +25%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5990 Points ∼100% +191%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1743 - 2074, n=4)
1983 Points ∼33% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=516)
2272 Points ∼38% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼52% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼72% +46%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2728 Points ∼61% +23%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4509 Points ∼100% +103%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2080 - 2258, n=5)
2198 Points ∼49% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=566)
2035 Points ∼45% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼23% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼41% +36%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1482 Points ∼30% +1%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4937 Points ∼100% +235%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1203 - 1478, n=5)
1415 Points ∼29% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=566)
1698 Points ∼34% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼27% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼45% +38%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1651 Points ∼34% +4%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4835 Points ∼100% +204%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1342 - 1601, n=5)
1535 Points ∼32% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=567)
1622 Points ∼34% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼55% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼73% +46%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2708 Points ∼61% +22%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4436 Points ∼100% +99%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2195 - 2286, n=4)
2226 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=608)
1901 Points ∼43% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼21% -37%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼52% +57%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2419 Points ∼40% +19%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6111 Points ∼100% +201%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1468 - 2048, n=4)
1891 Points ∼31% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=607)
2224 Points ∼36% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼25% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼57% +55%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2477 Points ∼44% +20%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5638 Points ∼100% +173%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1595 - 2088, n=4)
1952 Points ∼35% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=610)
1918 Points ∼34% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼60% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼81% -5%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
18523 Points ∼78% -9%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
23870 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (19797 - 20393, n=4)
20109 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=756)
15100 Points ∼63% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼32% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼91% +86%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
35401 Points ∼69% +41%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
51362 Points ∼100% +105%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (15971 - 25625, n=4)
22961 Points ∼45% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=754)
25291 Points ∼49% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼39% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼87% +49%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29229 Points ∼71% +22%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
40895 Points ∼100% +71%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (16738 - 24052, n=4)
22123 Points ∼54% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=754)
19970 Points ∼49% -16%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼28% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼56% +67%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
58 fps ∼42% +26%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
137 fps ∼100% +198%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (36 - 48, n=5)
42.2 fps ∼31% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=762)
43.1 fps ∼31% -6%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼97% +45%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
52 fps ∼87% +30%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (32 - 44, n=5)
38 fps ∼63% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=771)
30.2 fps ∼50% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼26% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼43% +58%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
29 fps ∼33% +21%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +267%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (18 - 26, n=5)
21.6 fps ∼25% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=667)
25.3 fps ∼29% +5%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼36% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼58% +48%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
27 fps ∼46% +17%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +157%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (17 - 24, n=5)
21 fps ∼36% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=675)
21.5 fps ∼36% -7%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼25% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼48% +80%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
20 fps ∼36% +33%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
56 fps ∼100% +273%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (14 - 16, n=5)
15.4 fps ∼28% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=530)
20.4 fps ∼36% +36%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼27% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼50% +71%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
19 fps ∼40% +36%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +243%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (14 - 14, n=5)
14 fps ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=532)
18.7 fps ∼39% +34%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼23% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼44% +69%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
7 fps ∼33% +27%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
21 fps ∼100% +282%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (5.5 - 8.3, n=5)
6.18 fps ∼29% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=278)
11.1 fps ∼53% +102%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼22% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼44% +74%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
4.4 fps ∼31% +26%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
14 fps ∼100% +300%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (3.5 - 3.6, n=5)
3.56 fps ∼25% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=276)
7.98 fps ∼57% +128%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼25% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼45% +65%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼33% +21%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +263%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.8 - 9.7, n=5)
9.28 fps ∼28% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=282)
16.4 fps ∼50% +80%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼27%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼24% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼43% +60%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
12 fps ∼32% +20%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +270%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (9.8 - 10, n=5)
9.96 fps ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=281)
19 fps ∼51% +90%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼28% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼50% +60%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
11 fps ∼34% +10%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
32 fps ∼100% +220%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (9.6 - 10, n=5)
9.92 fps ∼31% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=455)
13.8 fps ∼43% +38%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼29% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼46% +51%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
10 fps ∼36% +16%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
28 fps ∼100% +226%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (8.6 - 9.6, n=5)
9.06 fps ∼32% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=459)
12.3 fps ∼44% +43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼63% +9170%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼75% +10890%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
1229 Points ∼84% +12190%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% +14520%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (10 - 1202, n=5)
451 Points ∼31% +4410%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=699)
800 Points ∼55% +7900%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼26% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼47% +64%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2818 Points ∼37% +30%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
7640 Points ∼100% +252%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (2127 - 2168, n=5)
2153 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=699)
2379 Points ∼31% +10%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼49% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼91% +189%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
3288 Points ∼64% +105%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5116 Points ∼100% +219%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (1605 - 2122, n=5)
1778 Points ∼35% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8398, n=699)
1763 Points ∼34% +10%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼60% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼80% +43%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
5480 Points ∼65% +16%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8456 Points ∼100% +78%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (4029 - 4978, n=5)
4620 Points ∼55% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=699)
3325 Points ∼39% -30%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼47% +246%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼71% +425%
Google Pixel 3a
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Adreno 616, 4096
2811 Points ∼60% +343%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4689 Points ∼100% +640%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (634 - 2191, n=5)
1234 Points ∼26% +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6205, n=699)
1684 Points ∼36% +166%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
38475 Points ∼58%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
66660 Points ∼100% +73%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (33717 - 44600, n=5)
39466 Points ∼59% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=85)
53317 Points ∼80% +39%
MEM (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
43405 Points ∼60%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
71845 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (38016 - 44128, n=5)
40638 Points ∼57% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9394 - 104954, n=84)
54687 Points ∼76% +26%
GPU (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36821 Points ∼27%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
135337 Points ∼100% +268%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (34020 - 46247, n=5)
38559 Points ∼28% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29020 - 224320, n=84)
99879 Points ∼74% +171%
CPU (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
62594 Points ∼46%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
136978 Points ∼100% +119%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (57481 - 63005, n=5)
60559 Points ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23816 - 185108, n=84)
103367 Points ∼75% +65%
Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼44%
Huawei Nova 5T
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
410820 Points ∼100% +127%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
  (174870 - 187087, n=5)
179222 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=84)
311945 Points ∼76% +72%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼100% +70%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=160)
39.5 Points ∼84% +43%
Google Pixel 3a
33.563 Points ∼71% +21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 28.7, n=4)
27.9 Points ∼59% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼59%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
109.88 Points ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
87.488 Points ∼80% +71%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (50.3 - 51.9, n=4)
51.1 Points ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=590)
45.6 Points ∼41% -11%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼100% +60%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=144)
42.6 runs/min ∼92% +46%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼71% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (29 - 30.5, n=4)
29.5 runs/min ∼63% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼63%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
124 Points ∼100% +118%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
86 Points ∼69% +51%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=224)
69.2 Points ∼56% +21%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼50% +9%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=4)
51.8 Points ∼42% -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
22379 Points ∼100% +120%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼78% +72%
Google Pixel 3a
10844 Points ∼48% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼46% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10194, n=4)
9184 Points ∼41% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=755)
7556 Points ∼34% -26%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2000 - 59466, n=781)
9995 ms * ∼100% -128%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=4)
4948 ms * ∼50% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼39% +11%
Google Pixel 3a
3589.4 ms * ∼36% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼26% +41%
Huawei Nova 5T (Chrome 74)
2059 ms * ∼21% +53%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy A51Samsung Galaxy A50Xiaomi Mi 9TGoogle Pixel 3aHuawei Nova 5TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
4%
-12%
63%
-5%
-36%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
54 (28.6 - 70.2, n=15)
-10%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
69.7 (30.2 - 86, n=15)
-5%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
-6%
Random Write 4KB
104.4
18.2
-83%
107.82
3%
99.86
-4%
247.05
137%
76.2 (13.5 - 180, n=20)
-27%
31.7 (0.14 - 272, n=845)
-70%
Random Read 4KB
110.8
98.9
-11%
128.65
16%
63.6
-43%
146.23
32%
122 (88.4 - 173, n=20)
10%
55.8 (1.59 - 265, n=845)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
184.9
192.1
4%
179.19
-3%
253.87
37%
186.43
1%
192 (143 - 257, n=20)
4%
118 (2.99 - 756, n=845)
-36%
Sequential Read 256KB
496.1
507.3
2%
492.74
-1%
301.99
-39%
904.03
82%
494 (409 - 733, n=20)
0%
322 (12.1 - 1781, n=845)
-35%
010203040506070Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.32.1.2: Ø60 (60-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.32.1.2: Ø59.8 (53-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.9.3a: Ø27.8 (20-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.9.3a: Ø28.8 (18-31)
Max. Belasting
 38.8 °C35.9 °C33.3 °C 
 39.9 °C35.5 °C33.3 °C 
 39 °C35.4 °C32.7 °C 
Maximum: 39.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 36 °C
32.3 °C34.7 °C36.3 °C
31.5 °C34.2 °C39.3 °C
31.4 °C34.4 °C38.6 °C
Maximum: 39.3 °C
Gemiddelde: 34.7 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  38.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.544.22539.937.83134.532.54033.8355033.940.96328.933.58024.129.110023.22812523.233.516022.339.32002041.425018.743.531517.449.440017.153.550016.858.663014.562.680014.462.310001669.9125014.370.8160014.37020001570.8250014.272.1315014.273400014.166.3500014.569630014.569.2800014.971.91000015.265.31250015.557.31600016.156.6SPL68.227.281.7N22.60.949.7median 15.2median 62.6Delta2.510.942.246.742.143.934.636.737.342.739.84532.736.427.729.327.83125.734.323.340.22344.221.449.221.455.720.161.620.563.421.869.520.472.12074.618.273.918.972.9187419.174.518.276.71871.21968.21872.418.17518.166.418.252.318.148.365.965.66267.731.38518.518.514.623.11.662.7median 19.1median 68.21.811.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A51Samsung Galaxy A50
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A51 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 15% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.4 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.7 / 1.8 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.2 / 6.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Huawei Nova 5T
3750 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9611
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-2%
38%
27%
-12%
-31%
3%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.8
11%
0.54
40%
0.61
32%
0.87
3%
1.122 (0.9 - 1.6, n=5)
-25%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=859)
2%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.5
12%
0.95
44%
1.56
8%
2.34
-38%
2.39 (1.7 - 4.24, n=5)
-41%
1.751 (0.6 - 6.2, n=858)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
1.8
1.7
6%
1.08
40%
1.6
11%
2.4
-33%
2.91 (1.8 - 4.34, n=5)
-62%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=859)
-13%
Load Average *
5.2
5.9
-13%
2.7
48%
2.67
49%
4.56
12%
5.86 (5 - 6.99, n=5)
-13%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=853)
21%
Load Maximum *
6.6
8.3
-26%
5.4
18%
4.33
34%
6.97
-6%
7.6 (6.3 - 9.4, n=5)
-15%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=853)
9%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
28h 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 06min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 49min
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Google Pixel 3a
3000 mAh
Huawei Nova 5T
3750 mAh
Batterijduur
-2%
25%
-12%
11%
Reader / Idle
1689
1587
-6%
2138
27%
H.264
846
869
3%
1208
43%
WiFi v1.3
698
701
0%
991
42%
612
-12%
776
11%
Load
289
275
-5%
258
-11%

Pro

+ dunne, elegante behuizing
+ veelzijdige camera van goede kwaliteit
+ veel LTE-frequenties
+ aparte microSD-sleuf
+ 60-fps-gaming in sommige games
+ helder scherm met accurate kleuren
+ warmt nauwelijks op

Contra

- prestaties slechts matig voor deze prijsklasse
- batterijduur zou beter mogen
- geen naadloze zoom
- browsen voelt wat traag aan

Conclusie – goede mid-range

Review: Samsung Galaxy A51.
Review: Samsung Galaxy A51.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Samsung's Galaxy A51 is opnieuw een mid-range toestel dat nauwelijks echte zwaktes vertoont. De camera's behoren zeker tot de hoogtepunten van het toestel - al is er nog altijd een merkbaar verschil met de echte high-end toestellen, bijvoorbeeld op het vlak van prestaties bij weinig licht en bij in-/uitzoomen. Niettemin schiet de Galaxy A51 best wel indrukwekkende foto's. Het helder AMOLED-scherm is ook een waar plezier - we waren vooral onder de indruk van de nauwkeurige kleurweergave.

De telefoon ondersteunt een aanzienlijk groter aantal LTE-frequenties dan zijn voorganger, maar de Wi-Fi is nog altijd aan de trage kant.

Samsung had meer kunnen focussen op de prestaties en de batterijduur van het toestel, die niet van hetzelfde niveau zijn als de concurrentie. Deze aspecten worden vooral merkbaar bij een rechtstreekse vergelijking. De Galaxy A51 is nog altijd een betrouwbare mid-range smartphone.

De Galaxy A51 is een mid-range smartphone die op alle vlakken prima presteert en goede foto's maakt.

Aangezien Samsung geen enkele echte fout heeft gemaakt kunnen we de Galaxy A51-smartphone zonder enige twijfel aanbevelen.

Samsung Galaxy A51 - 13-01-2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Behuizing
83%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
46 / 70 → 65%
Gewicht
90%
Batterij
89%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
17 / 64 → 27%
Applicatie-performance
50 / 86 → 58%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
71 / 90 → 79%
Camera
63%
Gemiddelde
73%
80%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A51 Smartphone: toegewijd aan succes
Florian Schmitt, 2020-01-15 (Update: 2020-01-18)