Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A50 Smartphone

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, 19-04-2019

Driedubbel fotoplezier? Driedubbele camera aan de achterzijde en een helder AMOLED-beeldscherm op een smartphone in het middensegment? Dat klinkt misschien als een veelbelovende mix, maar kan de Samsung Galaxy A50 zijn verwachtingen waarmaken? Lees verder in dit artikel om erachter te komen.

Samsung Galaxy A50 (Galaxy A Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9610
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.4 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, AMOLED, 2.5D gebogen, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 106 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm audiopoort, Card Reader: tot 512 GB microSD kaarten, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Versnellingsmeter, kompas, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, USB Type-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.7 x 158.5 x 74.7
Batterij
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charging, 15 Watt
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 25 MPix , f/1.7, Fasevergelijking AF, LED flits, video's @ 1080p/30 FPS (Camera 1); 8.0 MP, f/2.2, groothoeklens (camera 2); 5.0 MP, f/2.2, Scherptediepte (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix , f/2.0
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Mono luidspreker aan de onderkant, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, Lader, USB kabel, SIM tool, oortjes, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR waardes: 1.39 W/kg – Body, 0.27 W/kg – Head. LTE Cat.6 (300 MBit/s downloads, 50 MBit/s uploads. FM radio, fanless
Gewicht
166 g
Prijs
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Galaxy A50

Size Comparison

159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 74.7 mm 7.7 mm 166 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g149.7 mm 71.2 mm 8 mm 160 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +131%
Nokia 7.1
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
334 (min: 311, max: 342) MBit/s ∼49% +14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼49% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼41% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=408)
222 MBit/s ∼33% -24%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼100% +96%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼60% +18%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼54% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼51%
Nokia 7.1
Adreno 509, 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash
232 (min: 217, max: 244) MBit/s ∼43% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=408)
212 MBit/s ∼40% -22%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (278-302)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø272 (250-285)
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Overzicht
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Overzicht
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Lus
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Lus
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Brug
GPS test: Samsung Galaxy A50 - Brug
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Brug
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Brug

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Onze testkaart
Onze testkaart
Onze testkaart (detail)
Onze testkaart (detail)
ColorChecker Passport: de onderste helft van elk vlak vertegenwoordigt de referentiekleur
ColorChecker Passport: de onderste helft van elk vlak vertegenwoordigt de referentiekleur
587
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
644
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
644
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 646 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 628.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 644 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.64 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
141.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.024
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
Nokia 7.1
IPS, 2280x1080, 5.84
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Screen
23%
-62%
-96%
29%
Brightness middle
644
570
-11%
537
-17%
577
-10%
593
-8%
Brightness
628
565
-10%
525
-16%
550
-12%
587
-7%
Brightness Distribution
91
93
2%
85
-7%
91
0%
94
3%
Black Level *
0.58
0.36
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.64
1.5
43%
6.41
-143%
7.4
-180%
0.9
66%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.23
3.6
61%
10.86
-18%
15
-63%
2
78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.2
52%
6.7
-168%
10.2
-308%
1.5
40%
Gamma
2.024 109%
2.07 106%
2.099 105%
2.29 96%
2.27 97%
CCT
6649 98%
6504 100%
8310 78%
9657 67%
6548 99%
Contrast
926
1603

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 119 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 119 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 119 Hz is erg laag en kan dus aanleiding geven tot geïrriteerde ogen en hoofdpijn bij langer gebruik.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9439 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4913 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼54% -18%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼57% -13%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4560 Points ∼61% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
4913 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=307)
4559 Points ∼61% -7%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5605 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼40% -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼45% -11%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4902 Points ∼45% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼100% +96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
5605 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=362)
4549 Points ∼41% -19%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1721 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼43% -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼38% -22%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1333 Points ∼38% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼100% +105%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1721 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=364)
1354 Points ∼38% -21%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼60% -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼69% +8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5663 Points ∼63% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼100% +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
5827 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=357)
4997 Points ∼55% -14%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼51% -20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼69% +8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6343 Points ∼58% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼100% +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
7029 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=525)
5466 Points ∼50% -22%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3288 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1779 - 15735, n=44)
2435 Points ∼74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5723 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (209 - 14536, n=44)
2471 Points ∼43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4914 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (260 - 14786, n=47)
2125 Points ∼43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1845 Points ∼49% -19%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2310 Points ∼62% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2266 Points ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=372)
1830 Points ∼49% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
629 Points ∼9% -47%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
869 Points ∼12% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +496%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1188 Points ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=372)
1598 Points ∼23% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
737 Points ∼12% -45%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1009 Points ∼17% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +345%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1328 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=375)
1484 Points ∼25% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1871 Points ∼49% -17%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2347 Points ∼62% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼100% +69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2241 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=386)
1805 Points ∼48% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼15%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
954 Points ∼9% -39%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1396 Points ∼14% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼100% +563%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1553 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=386)
2194 Points ∼21% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1071 Points ∼14% -36%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1534 Points ∼21% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +347%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1667 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=387)
1860 Points ∼25% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1821 Points ∼48% -23%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2251 Points ∼60% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2351 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=448)
1760 Points ∼47% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
634 Points ∼10% -45%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
811 Points ∼13% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +453%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1149 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=450)
1324 Points ∼21% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼24%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
741 Points ∼13% -43%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
945 Points ∼17% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +325%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1296 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=458)
1262 Points ∼23% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1829 Points ∼51% -25%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2316 Points ∼64% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2432 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=480)
1667 Points ∼46% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
845 Points ∼8% -34%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1323 Points ∼13% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +679%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1279 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=480)
1801 Points ∼18% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
960 Points ∼13% -33%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1462 Points ∼20% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +401%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1430 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=488)
1541 Points ∼22% +8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼55% -3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼62% +10%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
17274 Points ∼68% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼100% +77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
14353 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=640)
13636 Points ∼54% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼15% -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼20% +26%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
20610 Points ∼19% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼100% +542%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
16593 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11427 - 162695, n=640)
19988 Points ∼19% +20%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼26%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼24% -5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼31% +22%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
19762 Points ∼32% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼100% +288%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
16037 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (11565 - 83518, n=641)
16573 Points ∼27% +3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼22% -8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
35 fps ∼21% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼100% +328%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
39 fps ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=668)
34.9 fps ∼21% -11%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼60%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼58% -3%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
34 fps ∼57% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
36 fps ∼60% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=671)
26.9 fps ∼45% -25%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼23%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼16% -30%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
16 fps ∼16% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼100% +335%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
23 fps ∼23% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=587)
19.2 fps ∼19% -17%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -29%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
15 fps ∼25% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +186%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
21 fps ∼35% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=592)
17.8 fps ∼30% -15%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼14% -29%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
10 fps ∼14% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +393%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
14 fps ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=448)
15.8 fps ∼23% +13%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼22%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼17% -25%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
9.6 fps ∼17% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +346%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
13 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=451)
15.1 fps ∼26% +16%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼8% -59%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
3.5 fps ∼15% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +390%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
4.9 fps ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=151)
8.97 fps ∼37% +83%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼19%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼14% -26%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
2.2 fps ∼14% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼100% +416%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
3.1 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=151)
6.19 fps ∼39% +100%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼22%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼15% -32%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5.5 fps ∼15% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼100% +351%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
8.2 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=153)
13.4 fps ∼36% +63%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼22%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼13% -40%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6 fps ∼15% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼100% +356%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
9 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=152)
14.8 fps ∼36% +64%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼15% -29%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
6.3 fps ∼15% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼100% +372%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
8.9 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=377)
10.7 fps ∼25% +20%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼16% -26%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
5.9 fps ∼16% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +369%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
8.1 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=381)
9.64 fps ∼25% +19%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
144194 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼33% -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼31% -18%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
116496 Points ∼31% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +160%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
144194 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=270)
130378 Points ∼35% -10%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1090 Points ∼79% +18%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1046 Points ∼76% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼100% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
927 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=600)
741 Points ∼54% -20%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1356 Points ∼15% -31%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1590 Points ∼17% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼100% +374%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
1957 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=600)
1942 Points ∼21% -1%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2445 Points ∼61% -2%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1917 Points ∼48% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2492 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=600)
1446 Points ∼36% -42%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4506 Points ∼53% -12%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
4457 Points ∼53% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼100% +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
5112 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=600)
2852 Points ∼34% -44%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
2009 Points ∼44% -8%
Nokia 7.1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072
1941 Points ∼42% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼100% +110%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
2193 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=604)
1418 Points ∼31% -35%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (14.6 - 108, n=79)
30.7 Points ∼54%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼100% +99%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 123, n=70)
34.2 runs/min ∼52% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
33.1 runs/min ∼50% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼50%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼100% +74%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=131)
63.2 Points ∼59% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
62 Points ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼53% -8%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
54 Points ∼50% -13%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼50% -13%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼100% +138%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
10322 Points ∼42% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼37% -11%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
8627 Points ∼35% -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼34% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=661)
6268 Points ∼26% -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=681)
10805 ms * ∼100% -177%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼44% -23%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)
4562.2 ms * ∼42% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼38% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼36%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
3897 ms * ∼36% -0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17% +52%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy A50Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Motorola Moto G7 PlusNokia 7.1Xiaomi Mi 9Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
43%
-27%
248%
76%
-29%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
2%
61.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
61.5 (27.8 - 72.4, n=17)
1%
48.6 (9.5 - 87.1, n=403)
-20%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
83.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
77 (31.3 - 88.2, n=17)
4%
66.6 (8.1 - 96.5, n=403)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
18.2
15.45
-15%
73.1
302%
11.93
-34%
165.32
808%
83.2 (18.2 - 250, n=37)
357%
20.1 (0.14 - 250, n=710)
10%
Random Read 4KB
98.9
83.98
-15%
76.6
-23%
44.9
-55%
149.36
51%
138 (98.9 - 158, n=37)
40%
44.7 (1.59 - 175, n=710)
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB
192.1
104.87
-45%
208.7
9%
125.98
-34%
388.27
102%
206 (182 - 503, n=37)
7%
92 (2.99 - 503, n=710)
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
507.3
295.76
-42%
283.6
-44%
250.9
-51%
666.06
31%
747 (427 - 912, n=37)
47%
258 (12.1 - 1468, n=710)
-49%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.8 (55-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.9 (58-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.3a: Ø28.9 (24-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.3a: Ø29.5 (28-31)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.18.0: Ø59.3 (52-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.18.0: Ø59.2 (52-60)
Max. Belasting
 42.9 °C37.4 °C34.1 °C 
 41.6 °C37.1 °C34.6 °C 
 40 °C36.9 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 42.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.7 °C
31.7 °C34.7 °C40.7 °C
32 °C35 °C40.1 °C
32.5 °C35.9 °C38.1 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  39.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.246.72542.143.93134.636.74037.342.75039.8456332.736.48027.729.310027.83112525.734.316023.340.22002344.225021.449.231521.455.740020.161.650020.563.463021.869.580020.472.110002074.6125018.273.9160018.972.920001874250019.174.5315018.276.740001871.250001968.263001872.4800018.1751000018.166.41250018.252.31600018.148.3SPL65.965.66267.731.385N18.518.514.623.11.662.7median 19.1median 68.2Delta1.811.930.733.82528.726.828.426.328.729.838.227.424.72123.219.525.818.825.719.240.417.641.316.947.415.855.51556.71562.814.766.914.86814.666.514.369.213.471.814.472.514.473.214.876.61577.714.875.314.774.31575.314.972.815.264.515.755.126.885.50.961.4median 15median 66.91.210.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy A50Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.9 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Nokia 7.1
3060 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9610
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
10%
-11%
-7%
16%
0%
3%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.71
11%
1.1
-38%
1.01
-26%
0.67
16%
0.8
-0%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=742)
-10%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.36
9%
1.7
-13%
2.2
-47%
1.26
16%
1.5
-0%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=741)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
1.47
14%
2.1
-24%
2.25
-32%
1.29
24%
1.7
-0%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=742)
-19%
Load Average *
5.9
5.13
13%
5.1
14%
3.76
36%
3.71
37%
5.9
-0%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=736)
31%
Load Maximum *
8.3
7.89
5%
7.9
5%
5.56
33%
9.3
-12%
8.3
-0%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=736)
29%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
26h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 29min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 35min
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
Nokia 7.1
3060 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Batterijduur
-7%
-11%
-44%
-8%
Reader / Idle
1587
1467
-8%
983
-38%
1650
4%
H.264
869
836
-4%
809
-7%
507
-42%
1008
16%
WiFi v1.3
701
605
-14%
715
2%
346
-51%
546
-22%
Load
275
273
-1%
196
-29%
156
-43%
194
-29%

Pro

+ degelijke prestaties
+ geweldig beeldscherm
+ lange looptijden
+ apart microSD kaartslot
+ modern ontwerp

Contra

- onnauwkeurige vingerafdruksensor
- onnauwkeurige GPS-module
- matige camera aan de voorkant
- vooraf geïnstalleerde reclame
Samsung Galaxy A50 smartphone. Testmodel geleverd door notebooksbilliger.de.
Samsung Galaxy A50 smartphone. Testmodel geleverd door notebooksbilliger.de.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Samsung Galaxy A50 is een uitstekende middenklasse smartphone. Het is gebaseerd op de successen van zijn voorganger, zoals de drie achterwaarts gerichte camera's, maar combineert deze met een moderner ontwerp en een verbeterde SoC.

De A50 heeft weinig tekortkomingen, hoewel de vingerafdruksensor er langer over doet om vingers te herkennen en een lagere detectie heeft dan conventionele sensoren. Bovendien is zijn GPS-module merkwaardig onnauwkeurig en zijn Wi-Fi-prestaties soms slechter dan die van zijn voorganger.

Geweldig beeldscherm, lange batterijlevensduur, fatsoenlijke camera's. De Samsung Galaxy A50 presteert op alle belangrijke gebieden en is een topper van een middenklasse smartphone.

Samsung heeft ook op sommige gebieden wat steken laten vallen, zoals het beperken van LTE-prestaties onder wat de SoC kan bereiken, wat willekeurig lijkt. Het integreren van een aan de voorzijde gerichte sensor met een vaste focus heeft ook weinig zin.

Met dat gezegd, de A50 maakt echte vooruitgang in andere gebieden ten opzichte van de Galaxy A7 (2018). De Exynos 9610 is een grote sprong van de Exynos 7885 en presteert zelfs vergelijkbare Snapdragon-chips eruit. Samsung heeft ook een ongeveer 20% grotere batterij geïntegreerd, wat de A50 helpt om betere batterijduur te leveren dan zijn voorganger.

Over het algemeen zou de Galaxy A50 een uitstekende keuze zijn voor iedereen die op zoek is naar een smartphone die ongeveer €350 kost. De Galaxy A7 van vorig jaar (2018) biedt echter bijna dezelfde ervaring in een ouder ontwerp voor een fractie van de kosten.

 

 

Samsung Galaxy A50 - 18-04-2019 v6
Florian Schmitt

Behuizing
84%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
44 / 60 → 74%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
95%
Beeldscherm
90%
Gaming-performance
53 / 63 → 84%
Applicatie-performance
62 / 70 → 89%
Temperatuur
89%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
59 / 91 → 65%
Camera
73%
Gemiddelde
77%
87%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy A50 Smartphone
Florian Schmitt, 2019-04-19 (Update: 2019-04-19)