Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 Smartphone

Name: Xiaomi Mi 9
Brand: Xiaomi

Een betaalbaar vlaggenschip. Xiaomi heeft het onmogelijke mogelijk gemaakt met de Mi 9 - tenminste volgens de standaarden die de andere fabrikanten hebben gezet. De Mi 9 kost slechts 450 euro, wat een mid-range prijs is, maar het toestel behoort tot de beste vlaggenschip-smartphones die je momenteel kan kopen. Zijn 48-MP triple-camera, UFS 2.1-flash-opslag, hoogwaardige design en AMOLED-scherm zijn maar enkele pluspunten, net als zijn splinternieuwe Snapdragon 855-SoC. We nemen de Mi 9 onder de loep en vergelijken hem met de concurrentie.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 30-03-2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Testtoestel voorzien door TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Xiaomi Mi 9 (Mi 9 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 8 x 2.8 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)

Grafische kaart

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Geheugen

6144 MB

, LPDDR4x, 2133 MHz dual-channel

Beeldscherm

6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, oleophobic coating, anti-fingerprint, NTSC 103.8%, 90.7% screen-to-body ratio, glimmend: ja, 60 Hz

Opslag

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 50.51 GB beschikbaar

Verbindingen

1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, camera-laser-focus-sensor, elektronisch kompas, gyroscoop, afstandssensor, USB Type-C, aptX, aptX-HD, dual-SIM VoLTE, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi 2x2 MIMO, MU-MIMO, Google Pay

Netwerkmogelijkheden

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. UMTS: B1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 34, 39. LTE: B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40. 4x4 MIMO antenna. SAR values: Body – 1.301 W/kg, Head - 1.389 W/kg., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Afmetingen

hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.61 x 157.5 x 74.67

Batterij

3300 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Quick Charge 4.0, 20-W draadloos laden, 27-W bedraad laden

Besturingssysteem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix Triple-camera: 48-MP-hoofdcamera (Sony IMX586, f/1.75, 1/2", 0,8 µm) + 16-MP-groothoekcamera (f/2.2, 13 mm, 1/3.0", 1,0 µm) + 12-MP-zoom-camera (f/2.2, 54 mm, 1/3.6", 1.0 µm, 2x optische zoom), foto's tot 4K, video's tot 8.000 x 6.000 Pixel
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.0, 0.9 µm, HDR, tot [email protected] slow motion, [email protected]

Bijkomende functionaliteiten

Luidsprekers: 1 luidspreker, Toetsenbord: Virtueel, Modulaire voeding, USB Type-C-naar-Type-A-kabel, cover, SIM-tool, snelstarthandleiding, garantiekaart, MIUI 10, 12 Maanden Garantie, fanless

Gewicht

173 g, Voeding: 35 g

Prijs

449 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

zie alle specificaties

Formaat Vergelijking

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	1001 (209^min - 1106^max) MBit/s ∼100% +48%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	615 (532^min - 642^max) MBit/s ∼61% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (100^min - 534^max) MBit/s ∼49% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (561^min - 684^max) MBit/s ∼63% -7%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	629 (621^min - 638^max) MBit/s ∼63% -7%
Apple iPhone XR A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	517 (477^min - 528^max) MBit/s ∼52% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	491 (444^min - 499^max) MBit/s ∼49% -28%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	339 (325^min - 351^max) MBit/s ∼34% -50%
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641)	290 MBit/s ∼29% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	696 (647^min - 714^max) MBit/s ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	663 (289^min - 805^max) MBit/s ∼95% +24%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 (6^min - 792^max) MBit/s ∼93% +22%
Apple iPhone XR A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe	644 (578^min - 672^max) MBit/s ∼93% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s ∼77%
OnePlus 6T Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	474 (241^min - 497^max) MBit/s ∼68% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 (398^min - 508^max) MBit/s ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Adreno 630, SD 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	429 (256^min - 448^max) MBit/s ∼62% -20%
Honor View 20 Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	298 (278^min - 319^max) MBit/s ∼43% -44%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641)	276 MBit/s ∼40% -48%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (549-725)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø534 (430-578)

GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - overzicht

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden


568 cd/m²	587 cd/m²	589 cd/m²
589 cd/m²	593 cd/m²	600 cd/m²
591 cd/m²	564 cd/m²	601 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 601 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 586.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.28 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 94 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 593 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27

	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39	Apple iPhone XR IPS, 1792x828, 6.10	Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.30	Honor View 20 LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.40	OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.40	Xiaomi Mi 8 AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Screen		-18%	-22%	-79%	-58%	-113%	-157%
Brightness middle	593	672 13%	576 -3%	492 -17%	437 -26%	710 20%	430 -27%
Brightness	587	641 9%	582 -1%	475 -19%	442 -25%	721 23%	434 -26%
Brightness Distribution	94	92 -2%	90 -4%	94 0%	95 1%	97 3%	94 0%
Black Level *		0.35		0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	0.9	1.3 -44%	1.3 -44%	2.4 -167%	2.21 -146%	3.7 -311%	5.09 -466%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	2	2.7 -35%	3.5 -75%	5.2 -160%	4.27 -114%	10.3 -415%	8.05 -303%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.5	2.2 -47%	1.6 -7%	3.2 -113%	2.1 -40%	1.5 -0%	3.3 -120%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2.3 ^96%	2.18 ^101%	2.06 ^107%	2.307 ^95%	2.1 ^105%	2.257 ^97%
CCT	6548 ^99%	6868 ^95%	6561 ^99%	7125 ^91%	6353 ^102%	6611 ^98%	7026 ^93%
Contrast		1920		1230

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen

245.1 Hz

≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 245.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 245.1 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 2 ms stijging
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 2.4 ms stijging
4.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points ∼36%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	21070 Points ∼100% +182%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8938 Points ∼42% +19%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9028 Points ∼43% +21%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13341 Points ∼63% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10177 Points ∼48% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	13371 Points ∼63% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12)	7629 Points ∼36% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=365)	4925 Points ∼23% -34%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	11276 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	10024 Points ∼89% -9%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9868 Points ∼88% -10%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8995 Points ∼80% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10259 Points ∼91% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8907 Points ∼79% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14)	10955 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 14476, n=432)	5053 Points ∼45% -54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	4750 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3378 Points ∼71% -4%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3314 Points ∼70% -6%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2384 Points ∼50% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4505 Points ∼95% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2430 Points ∼51% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14)	3480 Points ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4970, n=432)	1545 Points ∼33% -56%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points ∼93%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9225 Points ∼95% +2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	9243 Points ∼95% +2%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8487 Points ∼87% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7812 Points ∼80% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7983 Points ∼82% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19)	9710 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=568)	6082 Points ∼63% -33%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points ∼86%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	12535 Points ∼98% +14%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	12778 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	10590 Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9793 Points ∼77% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	9689 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19)	12161 Points ∼95% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=717)	6703 Points ∼52% -39%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3030 Points ∼69% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4364 Points ∼100% +16%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4381 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3681 Points ∼84% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2925 Points ∼67% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2215 Points ∼51% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1934 - 5024, n=19)	3937 Points ∼90% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (573 - 5780, n=576)	2290 Points ∼52% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5061 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4250 Points ∼60% -40%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3718 Points ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5877 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5371 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4471 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5184 - 7148, n=19)	6802 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 12146, n=576)	2288 Points ∼32% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	4405 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4275 Points ∼72% -28%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	3847 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5189 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points ∼77% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3646 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3969 - 6404, n=19)	5820 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 9643, n=577)	2113 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	2880 Points ∼65% -24%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4407 Points ∼100% +16%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4393 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3374 Points ∼77% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3087 Points ∼70% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2181 Points ∼49% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2345 - 4703, n=18)	3892 Points ∼88% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 5765, n=607)	2208 Points ∼50% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	14085 Points ∼100% +37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5854 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5327 Points ∼38% -48%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8397 Points ∼60% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4449 Points ∼32% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5328 Points ∼38% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6358 - 10420, n=18)	9569 Points ∼68% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (70 - 22052, n=607)	3140 Points ∼22% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points ∼99%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	7555 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5456 Points ∼72% -27%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5087 Points ∼67% -32%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6310 Points ∼84% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4052 Points ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4034 Points ∼53% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5268 - 8141, n=18)	7186 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (88 - 11895, n=607)	2578 Points ∼34% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3121 Points ∼75% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4183 Points ∼100% +11%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4175 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3537 Points ∼85% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2977 Points ∼71% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2137 Points ∼51% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2705 - 4612, n=19)	3976 Points ∼95% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (435 - 5318, n=656)	2165 Points ∼52% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3806 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4206 Points ∼66% -34%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4256 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	5241 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4010 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5663 - 6362, n=19)	6242 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 11573, n=656)	1906 Points ∼30% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3629 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4201 Points ∼76% -24%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4238 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4734 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4452 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3356 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4556 - 5747, n=19)	5522 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 9138, n=657)	1809 Points ∼33% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	2960 Points ∼70% -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4150 Points ∼98% +15%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4214 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3483 Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2875 Points ∼68% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	2124 Points ∼50% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3001 - 4618, n=18)	3925 Points ∼93% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 5301, n=698)	2038 Points ∼48% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	7806 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5305 Points ∼53% -47%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5252 Points ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8272 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5303 Points ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6243 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (6122 - 10008, n=18)	9272 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 16670, n=697)	2545 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5724 Points ∼80% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4996 Points ∼70% -30%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4979 Points ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6336 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4465 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4363 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5251 - 7820, n=18)	7091 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 11256, n=700)	2173 Points ∼30% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	27413 Points ∼74% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	36755 Points ∼99% +45%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	37164 Points ∼100% +47%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35022 Points ∼94% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32302 Points ∼87% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	27858 Points ∼75% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (20636 - 45072, n=18)	32923 Points ∼89% +30%
Average of class Smartphone (735 - 59268, n=842)	15957 Points ∼43% -37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	162695 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	67730 Points ∼42% -36%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67388 Points ∼41% -37%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	84998 Points ∼52% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	70318 Points ∼43% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	77203 Points ∼47% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (97354 - 110432, n=17)	105781 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (536 - 224130, n=840)	29153 Points ∼18% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	77597 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	57047 Points ∼74% -8%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	57073 Points ∼74% -8%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	64534 Points ∼83% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55740 Points ∼72% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	55397 Points ∼71% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (55771 - 83518, n=17)	70036 Points ∼90% +13%
Average of class Smartphone (662 - 117606, n=840)	22274 Points ∼29% -64%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	232 fps ∼100% +39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	120 fps ∼52% -28%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	118 fps ∼51% -29%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	152 fps ∼66% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	96 fps ∼41% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	120 fps ∼52% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20)	153 fps ∼66% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=835)	48.7 fps ∼21% -71%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼95%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼95% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	61 fps ∼96% +2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	60 fps ∼95% 0%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼95% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	58 fps ∼91% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	60 fps ∼95% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20)	63.4 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=844)	32.5 fps ∼51% -46%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	132 fps ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	73 fps ∼55% -27%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	67 fps ∼51% -33%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼45% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps ∼51% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	67 fps ∼51% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20)	92.3 fps ∼70% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=740)	28.9 fps ∼22% -71%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	42 fps ∼70% -30%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	59 fps ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	56 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20)	59.6 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=748)	23.8 fps ∼40% -60%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps ∼78%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	88 fps ∼100% +28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29 fps ∼33% -58%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	50 fps ∼57% -28%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	59 fps ∼67% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	47 fps ∼53% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20)	62 fps ∼70% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=603)	23.1 fps ∼26% -67%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	60 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	26 fps ∼43% -55%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	48 fps ∼80% -17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	53 fps ∼88% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps ∼62% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	45 fps ∼75% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20)	47.7 fps ∼80% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=605)	20.6 fps ∼34% -64%

GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps ∼41%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps ∼100% +146%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	19 fps ∼32% -21%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	20 fps ∼34% -17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps ∼37% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps ∼27% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	22 fps ∼37% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (11 - 26, n=19)	21.3 fps ∼36% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 60, n=367)	11.8 fps ∼20% -51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	20 fps ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	13 fps ∼65% -19%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	14 fps ∼70% -12%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	14 fps ∼70% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8.5 - 24, n=20)	16.3 fps ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 101, n=365)	8.21 fps ∼41% -49%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps ∼63%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	59 fps ∼100% +59%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	18 fps ∼31% -51%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	31 fps ∼53% -16%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps ∼58% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps ∼44% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼59% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17 - 38, n=19)	33.2 fps ∼56% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 60, n=371)	17.6 fps ∼30% -52%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps ∼65%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	63 fps ∼100% +54%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	33 fps ∼52% -20%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	34 fps ∼54% -17%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	37 fps ∼59% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps ∼73% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	34 fps ∼54% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=20)	40 fps ∼63% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 257, n=371)	20.1 fps ∼32% -51%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps ∼78%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	54 fps ∼100% +29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	31 fps ∼57% -26%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	32 fps ∼59% -24%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35 fps ∼65% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps ∼80% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	26 fps ∼48% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22 - 43, n=20)	39.2 fps ∼73% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.6 - 75, n=528)	15.4 fps ∼29% -63%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps ∼66%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	58 fps ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	16 fps ∼28% -58%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	28 fps ∼48% -26%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	31 fps ∼53% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps ∼40% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	28 fps ∼48% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (16 - 41, n=20)	31.7 fps ∼55% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 60, n=532)	13.6 fps ∼23% -64%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37.41 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29.12 (9.74^min - 74.17^max) fps ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	35.34 fps ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32.26 (8.31^min - 85.07^max) fps ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)	35.9 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (7.73 - 85.6, n=74)	19.1 fps ∼51% -49%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	32.2 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	16.92 (6.06^min - 28.78^max) fps ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	29.68 fps ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.18 (8.36^min - 46.5^max) fps ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)	27.5 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 63, n=64)	16 fps ∼50% -50%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35.63 fps ∼93%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	25.57 (7.38^min - 46.96^max) fps ∼66% -28%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	32.86 fps ∼85% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.5 (9.69^min - 72.94^max) fps ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)	32.2 fps ∼84% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)	19.9 fps ∼52% -44%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	300617 Points ∼80% -20%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	306296 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	294488 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	333277 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16)	354450 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297)	143610 Points ∼38% -62%

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	257246 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	250848 Points ∼92% -2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	252800 Points ∼92% -2%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	228939 Points ∼84% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	273655 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	234421 Points ∼86% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (239512 - 268271, n=12)	255436 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=490)	87858 Points ∼32% -66%

VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4964 Score ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5025 Score ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4716 Score ∼94% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4967 Score ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4486 - 4969, n=3)	4806 Score ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 7649, n=100)	2561 Score ∼51% -48%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	1722 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1424 Points ∼83% +3%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	1404 Points ∼82% +2%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1398 Points ∼81% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1383 Points ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1292 Points ∼75% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1076 - 1601, n=19)	1356 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 2169, n=765)	843 Points ∼49% -39%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	15969 Points ∼100% +72%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6273 Points ∼39% -32%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	7484 Points ∼47% -19%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7969 Points ∼50% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8401 Points ∼53% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	7895 Points ∼49% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8125 - 9510, n=19)	9174 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 16996, n=765)	2614 Points ∼16% -72%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points ∼64%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	3263 Points ∼52% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	6283 Points ∼100% +56%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	5616 Points ∼89% +39%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4344 Points ∼69% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4306 Points ∼69% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3261 Points ∼52% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (2661 - 7500, n=19)	5097 Points ∼81% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 8874, n=765)	1977 Points ∼31% -51%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	11946 Points ∼100% +42%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	8604 Points ∼72% +2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	8594 Points ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	8156 Points ∼68% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8344 Points ∼70% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	6620 Points ∼55% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (5993 - 9143, n=19)	8539 Points ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 14189, n=765)	3587 Points ∼30% -58%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	5721 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4687 Points ∼82% +2%
Honor View 20 HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192	4746 Points ∼83% +3%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	4458 Points ∼78% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4520 Points ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	3852 Points ∼67% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3847 - 5397, n=19)	4796 Points ∼84% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 6402, n=765)	1844 Points ∼32% -60%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1415 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone XR Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072	2754 Points ∼100% +95%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1571 Points ∼57% +11%
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144	1201 Points ∼44% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1928 Points ∼70% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=4)	1334 Points ∼48% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 3575, n=148)	909 Points ∼33% -36%

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	267.84 Points ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	110.54 Points ∼41%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	109.18 Points ∼41% -1%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	108.07 Points ∼40% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (84.4 - 120, n=17)	108 Points ∼40% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	91.774 Points ∼34% -17%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	86.123 Points ∼32% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	75.483 Points ∼28% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=660)	50.4 Points ∼19% -54%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	42897 Points ∼100% +75%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points ∼57%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	23285 Points ∼54% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=20)	23240 Points ∼54% -5%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	22500 Points ∼52% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20849 Points ∼49% -15%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	16824 Points ∼39% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	15086 Points ∼35% -39%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=830)	8415 Points ∼20% -66%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=856)	9483 ms * ∼100% -406%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	2818 ms * ∼30% -50%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	2281.6 ms * ∼24% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19)	2147 ms * ∼23% -15%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	2048.1 ms * ∼22% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	1951.9 ms * ∼21% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873.2 ms * ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1856.6 ms * ∼20% +1%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	610.3 ms * ∼6% +67%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	161 Points ∼100% +49%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	124 Points ∼77% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	115 Points ∼71% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20)	105 Points ∼65% -3%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	99 Points ∼61% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	83 Points ∼52% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=298)	71 Points ∼44% -34%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)	343 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)	334 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	314 Points ∼92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (260 - 316, n=2)	288 Points ∼84%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)	263 Points ∼77%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)	260 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)	245 Points ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone (165 - 362, n=347)	124 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 9	Points ∼0%

* ... kleiner is beter

	Xiaomi Mi 9	Huawei Mate 20 Pro	Honor View 20	OnePlus 6T	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus	Xiaomi Mi 8	Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-5%	-3%	-33%	-28%	-35%	-28%	-61%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)			60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		51.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=32)	51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)			73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		68.1 (18 - 87.1, n=32)	69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564)
Random Write 4KB	165.32	157.84 -5%	138.85 -16%	22 -87%	22.7 -86%	21 -87%	68.8 (8.77 - 165, n=43) -58%	40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -76%
Random Read 4KB	149.36	157.42 5%	168.91 13%	138.5 -7%	135.16 -10%	136.3 -9%	133 (78.2 - 173, n=43) -11%	63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -58%
Sequential Write 256KB	388.27	196.39 -49%	250.06 -36%	204.4 -47%	249.06 -36%	207.8 -46%	199 (133 - 388, n=43) -49%	139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -64%
Sequential Read 256KB	666.06	853.28 28%	847.48 27%	735.3 10%	811.17 22%	693.2 4%	703 (476 - 895, n=43) 6%	363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) -46%

Max. Belasting

Inactief


31 °C	31.8 °C	30 °C
31.8 °C	30.7 °C	30.1 °C
31.3 °C	31.4 °C	30.2 °C

Maximum: 31.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.9 °C


28.8 °C	30.3 °C	30.5 °C
28.5 °C	30 °C	30.8 °C
29 °C	30.2 °C	30.9 °C

Maximum: 30.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.9 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 26.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Inactief	0.67 / 1.26 / 1.29 Watt
Belasting	3.71 / 9.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-38%	-35%	-58%	-11%	-30%	-76%	-24%	-22%
Idle Minimum *	0.67	0.61 9%	0.95 -42%	0.97 -45%	0.7 -4%	0.73 -9%	1.5 -124%	0.939 (0.58 - 1.96, n=19) -40%	0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=927) -33%
Idle Average *	1.26	2.67 -112%	2.17 -72%	2.58 -105%	1.1 13%	1.53 -21%	2.2 -75%	1.506 (0.85 - 2.8, n=19) -20%	1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=926) -40%
Idle Maximum *	1.29	2.69 -109%	2.25 -74%	2.63 -104%	2.1 -63%	2.07 -60%	2.6 -102%	1.799 (1 - 2.9, n=19) -39%	2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=927) -58%
Load Average *	3.71	4.34 -17%	4.47 -20%	5.24 -41%	4.2 -13%	6.03 -63%	6.1 -64%	4.61 (3.64 - 5.8, n=19) -24%	4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=921) -11%
Load Maximum *	9.3	5.66 39%	6.15 34%	8.73 6%	8.3 11%	9.18 1%	10.9 -17%	9.04 (7.49 - 11.9, n=19) 3%	6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=921) 34%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		27h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16h 48min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		3h 14min

	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh	Honor View 20 4000 mAh	OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh
Batterijduur		47%	19%	25%	25%	-8%	9%
Reader / Idle	1650	2969 80%	1747 6%	1928 17%	1936 17%	1560 -5%	1634 -1%
H.264	1008	1011 0%	854 -15%	932 -8%	903 -10%	921 -9%	897 -11%
WiFi v1.3	546	910 67%	767 40%	969 77%	865 58%	483 -12%	736 35%
Load	194	270 39%	282 45%	222 14%	261 35%	187 -4%	215 11%

Pro

+ hoogwaardige, glazen behuizing

+ snelle Wi-Fi

+ nauwkeurige GPS

+ dual-SIM

+ Widevine DRM L1

+ uitstekende triple-camera's aan achterzijde

+ snelle vingerafdruklezer

+ snelle gezichtsherkenning

+ indrukwekkend AMOLED-scherm

+ krachtig SoC

+ UFS 2.1 opslag

+ draadloos laden

+ Quick Charge 4.0

Contra

- behuizing is gevoelig voor vingerafdrukken

- niet bestand tegen water of stof

- toestel ligt niet vlak door zijn triple-camera's aan achterzijde

- geen micro-SD-kaart

- Type-C-poort werkt slechts als USB 2.0

- geen audioklink

- PWM

- ondermaatse batterijduur

Getest: de Xiaomi Mi 9 smartphone. Testtoestel voorzien door TradingShenzhen.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Xiaomi Mi 9 is een uitstekende smartphone die ongelooflijk veel waar voor het geld biedt ten opzichte van de andere vlaggenschip-smartphones. Het basismodel met 6 GB RAM en 64 GB opslag is reeds prima uitgerust volgens moderne standaarden. Toch is het model met 128 GB wellicht een betere keuze voor veel mensen, aangezien de Mi 9 geen ondersteuning biedt voor uitbreidbare opslag.

Xiaomi heeft alle Mi 9-modellen uitgerust met uitstekende triple-camera's, een helder AMOLED-scherm met voorbeeldige kleurweergave en een stijlvolle en hoogwaardige, glazen behuizing. De nieuwe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC maakt de Mi 9 ook tot een van de krachtigste smartphones die je momenteel kan kopen. Dit zal echter veranderen naarmate er meer smartphones met een Snapdragon 855 verschijnen.

De Xiaomi Mi 9 is dé smartphone die je moet kopen als je op zoek bent naar een vlaggenschip-ervaring voor een beperkt budget. Het toestel biedt alles dat zijn concurrenten ook bieden, maar dan zonder een fortuin te kosten.

Hoewel we ook een aantal punten van kritiek hebben, over o.a. het ontbreken van een audioklink en ondersteuning voor microSD-kaart, is de Mi 9 in goed gezelschap, aangezien veel van zijn concurrenten deze features ook missen. De stijlvolle, glazen behuizing is ook gevoelig voor vingerafdrukken en de triple-camera aan de achterzijde zorgt ervoor dat het toestel wiebelt op een tafel, maar deze minpunten doen weinig af aan het feit dat dit voorlopig een van de beste vlaggenschip-smartphones is die je kan kopen in 2019.

Xiaomi Mi 9 - 2019-09-2727-09-2019 v7
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing

84%

Toetsenbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Aanwijsapparaat

95%

Aansluitmogelijkheden

50 / 70 → 71%

Gewicht

90%

Batterij

88%

Beeldscherm

90%

Gaming-performance

55 / 64 → 86%

Applicatie-performance

76 / 86 → 88%

Temperatuur

94%

Luidheid

100%

Audio

81 / 90 → 90%

Camera

70%

Gemiddelde

80%

86%

Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Linked Articles

Xiaomi Mi 9 (Mi 9 Serie)

Testrapport

•

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 L...

Testrapport

•

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9T ...

Testrapport

•

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9T ...

Testrapport

•

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 S...

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 Smartphone

Formaat Vergelijking

Top 10 Testrapporten

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Responstijd Scherm

Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi 8 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Linked Articles

Pricecompare