Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 Smartphone

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 30-03-2019

Een betaalbaar vlaggenschip. Xiaomi heeft het onmogelijke mogelijk gemaakt met de Mi 9 - tenminste volgens de standaarden die de andere fabrikanten hebben gezet. De Mi 9 kost slechts 450 euro, wat een mid-range prijs is, maar het toestel behoort tot de beste vlaggenschip-smartphones die je momenteel kan kopen. Zijn 48-MP triple-camera, UFS 2.1-flash-opslag, hoogwaardige design en AMOLED-scherm zijn maar enkele pluspunten, net als zijn splinternieuwe Snapdragon 855-SoC. We nemen de Mi 9 onder de loep en vergelijken hem met de concurrentie.

Xiaomi Mi 9 (Mi Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Geheugen
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x, 2133 MHz dual-channel
Beeldscherm
6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, oleophobic coating, anti-fingerprint, NTSC 103.8%, 90.7% screen-to-body ratio, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50.51 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, camera-laser-focus-sensor, elektronisch kompas, gyroscoop, afstandssensor, USB Type-C, aptX, aptX-HD, dual-SIM VoLTE, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display, Wi-Fi 2x2 MIMO, MU-MIMO, Google Pay
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. UMTS: B1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 34, 39. LTE: B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40. 4x4 MIMO antenna. SAR values: Body – 1.301 W/kg, Head - 1.389 W/kg., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.61 x 157.5 x 74.67
Batterij
3300 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Quick Charge 4.0, 20-W draadloos laden, 27-W bedraad laden
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix Triple-camera: 48-MP-hoofdcamera (Sony IMX586, f/1.75, 1/2", 0,8 µm) + 16-MP-groothoekcamera (f/2.2, 13 mm, 1/3.0", 1,0 µm) + 12-MP-zoom-camera (f/2.2, 54 mm, 1/3.6", 1.0 µm, 2x optische zoom), foto's tot 4K, video's tot 8.000 x 6.000 Pixel
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.0, 0.9 µm, HDR, tot [email protected] slow motion, [email protected]
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1 luidspreker, Toetsenbord: Virtueel, Modulaire voeding, USB Type-C-naar-Type-A-kabel, cover, SIM-tool, snelstarthandleiding, garantiekaart, MIUI 10, 12 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
173 g, Voeding: 35 g
Prijs
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Formaat Vergelijking

157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g156.9 mm 75.4 mm 8.1 mm 180 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
517 (min: 477, max: 528) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 444, max: 499) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (min: 325, max: 351) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=396)
220 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +30%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% +24%
Apple iPhone XR
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
644 (min: 578, max: 672) MBit/s ∼93% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼77%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼68% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼66% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
429 (min: 256, max: 448) MBit/s ∼62% -20%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (min: 278, max: 319) MBit/s ∼43% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=396)
210 MBit/s ∼30% -61%

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks 
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø678 (549-725)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø534 (430-578)
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - overzicht
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - overzicht
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - hoeken
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - hoeken
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - rotonde
GPS-test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - rotonde
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - overzicht
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - overzicht
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - hoeken
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - hoeken
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - rotonde
GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10+ - rotonde

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
568
cd/m²		587
cd/m²		589
cd/m²
589
cd/m²		593
cd/m²		600
cd/m²
591
cd/m²		564
cd/m²		601
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 601 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 586.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.28 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 94 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 593 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39		Apple iPhone XR
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1		Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3		Honor View 20
LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4		OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41		Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4		Xiaomi Mi 8
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Screen
-18%
-22%
-79%
-58%
-113%
-157%
Brightness middle
593
672
13%
576
-3%
492
-17%
437
-26%
710
20%
430
-27%
Brightness
587
641
9%
582
-1%
475
-19%
442
-25%
721
23%
434
-26%
Brightness Distribution
94
92
-2%
90
-4%
94
0%
95
1%
97
3%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.35
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.9
1.3
-44%
1.3
-44%
2.4
-167%
2.21
-146%
3.7
-311%
5.09
-466%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2
2.7
-35%
3.5
-75%
5.2
-160%
4.27
-114%
10.3
-415%
8.05
-303%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
2.2
-47%
1.6
-7%
3.2
-113%
2.1
-40%
1.5
-0%
3.3
-120%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.3 96%
2.18 101%
2.06 107%
2.307 95%
2.1 105%
2.257 97%
CCT
6548 99%
6868 95%
6561 99%
7125 91%
6353 102%
6611 98%
7026 93%
Contrast
1920
1230

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 245.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 245.1 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9524 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ
De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
   ↔    Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
   ↔    Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2.4 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.3 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | Basemark GPU | AnTuTu v7 | AnTuTu v6 | VRMark | BaseMark OS II | Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼36%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
21070 Points ∼100% +182%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8938 Points ∼42% +19%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9028 Points ∼43% +21%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13341 Points ∼63% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼48% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13371 Points ∼63% +79%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7372 - 8024, n=6)
7627 Points ∼36% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=297)
4520 Points ∼21% -40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼98%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
11276 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10024 Points ∼89% -9%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9868 Points ∼88% -10%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8995 Points ∼80% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8907 Points ∼79% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10187 - 11388, n=7)
11024 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=351)
4482 Points ∼40% -59%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
4750 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3378 Points ∼71% -4%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3314 Points ∼70% -6%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2384 Points ∼50% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼95% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2430 Points ∼51% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3460 - 3537, n=7)
3504 Points ∼74% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (758 - 4824, n=353)
1326 Points ∼28% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼93%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9225 Points ∼95% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9243 Points ∼95% +2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8487 Points ∼87% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼80% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7983 Points ∼82% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8342 - 11440, n=6)
9741 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=347)
4930 Points ∼51% -45%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼86%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
12535 Points ∼98% +14%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12778 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10590 Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼77% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9689 Points ∼76% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10330 - 14439, n=6)
12230 Points ∼96% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=515)
5389 Points ∼42% -51%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3030 Points ∼69% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4364 Points ∼100% +16%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4381 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3681 Points ∼84% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼67% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2215 Points ∼51% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3754 - 4535, n=6)
4244 Points ∼97% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=361)
1812 Points ∼41% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5061 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4250 Points ∼60% -40%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3718 Points ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5877 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4471 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6951 - 7115, n=6)
7074 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=361)
1553 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
4405 Points ∼72% -26%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4275 Points ∼69% -28%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3847 Points ∼62% -35%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5189 Points ∼84% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼74% -23%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3646 Points ∼59% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5913 - 6312, n=6)
6156 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=364)
1449 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2880 Points ∼65% -24%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4407 Points ∼100% +16%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4393 Points ∼100% +16%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3374 Points ∼77% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼70% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2181 Points ∼49% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3788 - 4462, n=5)
4206 Points ∼95% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4493, n=375)
1781 Points ∼40% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
14085 Points ∼100% +37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5854 Points ∼42% -43%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5327 Points ∼38% -48%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8397 Points ∼60% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼32% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5328 Points ∼38% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (10028 - 10420, n=5)
10268 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=375)
2124 Points ∼15% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼96%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
7555 Points ∼97% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5456 Points ∼70% -27%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5087 Points ∼65% -32%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6310 Points ∼81% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼52% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4034 Points ∼52% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7449 - 7980, n=5)
7771 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 7980, n=376)
1809 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3121 Points ∼75% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4183 Points ∼100% +11%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4175 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3537 Points ∼85% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼71% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2137 Points ∼51% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3037 - 4262, n=6)
3872 Points ∼93% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4262, n=437)
1740 Points ∼42% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3806 Points ∼60% -40%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4206 Points ∼66% -34%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4256 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5241 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4010 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (6233 - 6362, n=6)
6312 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=439)
1283 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3629 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4201 Points ∼76% -24%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4238 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼81% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3356 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5104 - 5734, n=6)
5521 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=447)
1227 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2960 Points ∼70% -18%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4150 Points ∼98% +15%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4214 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3483 Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼68% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2124 Points ∼50% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3614 - 4240, n=5)
3968 Points ∼94% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4240, n=469)
1644 Points ∼39% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
7806 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5305 Points ∼53% -47%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5252 Points ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8272 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6243 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (9653 - 10008, n=5)
9890 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=469)
1739 Points ∼17% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼97%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5724 Points ∼77% -20%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4996 Points ∼67% -30%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4979 Points ∼67% -31%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6336 Points ∼85% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼60% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4363 Points ∼59% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (7166 - 7673, n=5)
7422 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7673, n=477)
1493 Points ∼20% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
27413 Points ∼74% +8%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
36755 Points ∼99% +45%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
37164 Points ∼100% +47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35022 Points ∼94% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼87% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
27858 Points ∼75% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (25339 - 45072, n=5)
34043 Points ∼92% +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=629)
13516 Points ∼36% -47%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
162695 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
67730 Points ∼42% -36%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67388 Points ∼41% -37%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
84998 Points ∼52% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼43% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
77203 Points ∼47% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (106534 - 110432, n=5)
107520 Points ∼66% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=629)
19557 Points ∼12% -82%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
77597 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57047 Points ∼74% -8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
57073 Points ∼74% -8%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64534 Points ∼83% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55397 Points ∼71% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (62225 - 83518, n=5)
71771 Points ∼92% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=630)
16333 Points ∼21% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
232 fps ∼100% +39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
120 fps ∼52% -28%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
118 fps ∼51% -29%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
152 fps ∼66% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼41% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
120 fps ∼52% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (162 - 167, n=7)
166 fps ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=657)
34.2 fps ∼15% -80%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼93%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼93% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
61 fps ∼94% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼93% 0%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼93% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼90% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (60 - 91, n=7)
64.6 fps ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=660)
26.5 fps ∼41% -56%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
132 fps ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
73 fps ∼55% -27%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67 fps ∼51% -33%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼45% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼51% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
67 fps ∼51% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (97 - 102, n=7)
100 fps ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=576)
18.7 fps ∼14% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼96%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42 fps ∼67% -30%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼95% -2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼95% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼85% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼90% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (55 - 85, n=7)
62.4 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=581)
17.4 fps ∼28% -71%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼78%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
88 fps ∼100% +28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼33% -58%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
50 fps ∼57% -28%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼67% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
47 fps ∼53% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (41 - 71, n=7)
65.6 fps ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=438)
15.5 fps ∼18% -78%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼97%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
26 fps ∼43% -55%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
48 fps ∼80% -17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
53 fps ∼88% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
45 fps ∼75% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (36 - 58, n=7)
49.7 fps ∼83% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=441)
14.9 fps ∼25% -74%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼41%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +146%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19 fps ∼32% -21%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼34% -17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼37% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼27% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼37% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (15 - 26, n=6)
23.2 fps ∼39% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=142)
8.79 fps ∼15% -63%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
20 fps ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼65% -19%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼70% -12%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼85% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼70% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (16 - 17, n=7)
16.4 fps ∼82% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=142)
6.01 fps ∼30% -62%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼63%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
59 fps ∼100% +59%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
18 fps ∼31% -51%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31 fps ∼53% -16%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼58% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼44% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼59% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (23 - 38, n=6)
35 fps ∼59% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=143)
13.1 fps ∼22% -65%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼65%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
63 fps ∼100% +54%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼52% -20%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34 fps ∼54% -17%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼59% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼73% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
34 fps ∼54% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (40.7 - 43, n=7)
42 fps ∼67% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=142)
14.5 fps ∼23% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼78%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
54 fps ∼100% +29%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼57% -26%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼59% -24%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼65% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼80% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼48% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (41 - 42, n=7)
41.9 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=367)
10.4 fps ∼19% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼66%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
58 fps ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16 fps ∼28% -58%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28 fps ∼48% -26%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
31 fps ∼53% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼40% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
28 fps ∼48% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (21 - 38, n=7)
32.4 fps ∼56% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=371)
9.43 fps ∼16% -75%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35.34 fps ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (33.1 - 37.4, n=3)
35.9 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.09 - 651, n=59)
26.2 fps ∼70% -30%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
29.68 fps ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (22.7 - 32.2, n=2)
27.5 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.62 - 606, n=54)
23.3 fps ∼72% -28%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼93%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼66% -28%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
32.86 fps ∼85% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (24.5 - 36.3, n=3)
32.2 fps ∼84% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.16 - 739, n=54)
28.1 fps ∼73% -21%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
300617 Points ∼80% -20%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
306296 Points ∼82% -18%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
294488 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (217967 - 380913, n=7)
349259 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 380913, n=259)
127011 Points ∼34% -66%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
257246 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250848 Points ∼92% -2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
252800 Points ∼92% -2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
228939 Points ∼84% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
273655 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
234421 Points ∼86% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (239512 - 263002, n=7)
254639 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=463)
84012 Points ∼31% -67%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5025 Score ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4716 Score ∼94% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (4486 - 4969, n=3)
4806 Score ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (552 - 5025, n=56)
1920 Score ∼38% -61%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
1722 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1424 Points ∼83% +3%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1404 Points ∼82% +2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1398 Points ∼81% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1292 Points ∼75% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1264 - 1415, n=6)
1373 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=589)
734 Points ∼43% -47%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
15969 Points ∼100% +72%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6273 Points ∼39% -32%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7484 Points ∼47% -19%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7969 Points ∼50% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼53% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7895 Points ∼49% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (8125 - 9477, n=6)
9165 Points ∼57% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=589)
1890 Points ∼12% -80%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼64%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
3263 Points ∼52% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6283 Points ∼100% +56%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5616 Points ∼89% +39%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4344 Points ∼69% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼69% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3261 Points ∼52% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3560 - 6661, n=6)
5013 Points ∼80% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 6661, n=589)
1412 Points ∼22% -65%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼71%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
11946 Points ∼100% +42%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8604 Points ∼72% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8594 Points ∼72% +2%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8156 Points ∼68% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼70% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6620 Points ∼55% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (5993 - 9143, n=6)
8421 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=589)
2798 Points ∼23% -67%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼80%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
5721 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4687 Points ∼82% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4746 Points ∼83% +3%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4458 Points ∼78% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3852 Points ∼67% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (3847 - 5314, n=6)
4791 Points ∼84% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=593)
1388 Points ∼24% -70%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼51%
Apple iPhone XR
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 3072
2754 Points ∼100% +95%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1571 Points ∼57% +11%
OnePlus 6T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1201 Points ∼44% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼70% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
  (1075 - 1425, n=3)
1305 Points ∼47% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=97)
704 Points ∼26% -50%
JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 3 | WebXPRT 2015
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
267.84 Points ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
110.54 Points ∼41%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼41% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90.8 - 118, n=4)
109 Points ∼41% -1%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
108.07 Points ∼40% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
91.774 Points ∼34% -17%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼32% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
75.483 Points ∼28% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=494)
38.1 Points ∼14% -66%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
42897 Points ∼100% +75%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼57%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼54% -5%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
22500 Points ∼52% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25051, n=7)
22464 Points ∼52% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼49% -15%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼39% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
15086 Points ∼35% -39%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=650)
6112 Points ∼14% -75%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=670)
10908 ms * ∼100% -482%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
2818 ms * ∼26% -50%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼21% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1873 - 2611, n=6)
2211 ms * ∼20% -18%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
2048.1 ms * ∼19% -9%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼18% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼17% +1%
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
610.3 ms * ∼6% +67%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
161 Points ∼100% +49%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼77% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼71% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (94 - 114, n=7)
107 Points ∼66% -1%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
99 Points ∼61% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
83 Points ∼52% -23%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 161, n=123)
62.7 Points ∼39% -42%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0)
343 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
314 Points ∼92%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
263 Points ∼77%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72)
245 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (260 - 316, n=3)
192 Points ∼56%
Average of class Smartphone (66 - 362, n=326)
119 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Points ∼0%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Mi 9Huawei Mate 20 ProHonor View 20OnePlus 6TSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusXiaomi Mi 8Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-5%
-3%
-33%
-28%
-35%
-29%
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=26)
48.3 (9.5 - 87.1, n=392)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
67.1 (18 - 86.6, n=26)
66.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=392)
Random Write 4KB
165.32
157.84
-5%
138.85
-16%
22
-87%
22.7
-86%
21
-87%
53.8 (8.77 - 165, n=35)
-67%
19.3 (0.14 - 250, n=699)
-88%
Random Read 4KB
149.36
157.42
5%
168.91
13%
138.5
-7%
135.16
-10%
136.3
-9%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=35)
-10%
43.9 (1.59 - 175, n=699)
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB
388.27
196.39
-49%
250.06
-36%
204.4
-47%
249.06
-36%
207.8
-46%
198 (133 - 388, n=35)
-49%
90.2 (2.99 - 392, n=699)
-77%
Sequential Read 256KB
666.06
853.28
28%
847.48
27%
735.3
10%
811.17
22%
693.2
4%
725 (529 - 895, n=35)
9%
254 (12.1 - 1468, n=699)
-62%
Max. Belasting
 31 °C31.8 °C30 °C 
 31.8 °C30.7 °C30.1 °C 
 31.3 °C31.4 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 31.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.9 °C
28.8 °C30.3 °C30.5 °C
28.5 °C30 °C30.8 °C
29 °C30.2 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 30.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  26.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.432.92528.325.43118.726.54026.725.95033.229.46322.622.78021.822.210024.43112523.839.216018.550.420017.149.125017.853.831515.556.140014.162.55001467.963013.869.180014.773.5100015.477125015.276.6160014.376.5200014.574.9250013.971.7315014.675.9400014.178.1500014.374.3630014.574.6800014.875.71000014.8751250014.864.4160001558.2SPL26.887.1N0.871.4median 14.8median 71.7Delta1.51042.737.742.136.430.529.133.632.738.134.830.431.825.224.825.524.9262921.538.920.144.618.947.817.85418.35819.162.619.565.217.366.515.767.214.369.615.87114.874.915.470.714.766.814.361.314.768.414.870.714.267.51462.214.554.914.347.568.82881.222.2147.9median 15.7median 62.62.310.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9Xiaomi Mi 8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi 8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.24 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.26 / 1.29 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.71 / 9.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh		Apple iPhone XR
2942 mAh		Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh		Honor View 20
4000 mAh		OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-35%
-58%
-11%
-30%
-76%
-22%
-20%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.61
9%
0.95
-42%
0.97
-45%
0.7
-4%
0.73
-9%
1.5
-124%
0.88 (0.6 - 1.3, n=7)
-31%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=727)
-31%
Idle Average *
1.26
2.67
-112%
2.17
-72%
2.58
-105%
1.1
13%
1.53
-21%
2.2
-75%
1.446 (1.01 - 2.2, n=7)
-15%
1.736 (0.6 - 6.2, n=726)
-38%
Idle Maximum *
1.29
2.69
-109%
2.25
-74%
2.63
-104%
2.1
-63%
2.07
-60%
2.6
-102%
1.914 (1.13 - 2.9, n=7)
-48%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=727)
-57%
Load Average *
3.71
4.34
-17%
4.47
-20%
5.24
-41%
4.2
-13%
6.03
-63%
6.1
-64%
4.49 (3.64 - 5.8, n=7)
-21%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=721)
-10%
Load Maximum *
9.3
5.66
39%
6.15
34%
8.73
6%
8.3
11%
9.18
1%
10.9
-17%
8.65 (7.49 - 10.2, n=7)
7%
5.87 (1.2 - 14.2, n=721)
37%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
27h 30min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
9h 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 48min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 14min
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh		Apple iPhone XR
2942 mAh		Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh		Honor View 20
4000 mAh		OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh		Xiaomi Mi 8
3400 mAh
Batterijduur
47%
19%
25%
25%
-8%
9%
Reader / Idle
1650
2969
80%
1747
6%
1928
17%
1936
17%
1560
-5%
1634
-1%
H.264
1008
1011
0%
854
-15%
932
-8%
903
-10%
921
-9%
897
-11%
WiFi v1.3
546
910
67%
767
40%
969
77%
865
58%
483
-12%
736
35%
Load
194
270
39%
282
45%
222
14%
261
35%
187
-4%
215
11%

Pro

+ hoogwaardige, glazen behuizing
+ snelle Wi-Fi
+ nauwkeurige GPS
+ dual-SIM
+ Widevine DRM L1
+ uitstekende triple-camera's aan achterzijde
+ snelle vingerafdruklezer
+ snelle gezichtsherkenning
+ indrukwekkend AMOLED-scherm
+ krachtig SoC
+ UFS 2.1 opslag
+ draadloos laden
+ Quick Charge 4.0

Contra

- behuizing is gevoelig voor vingerafdrukken
- niet bestand tegen water of stof
- toestel ligt niet vlak door zijn triple-camera's aan achterzijde
- geen micro-SD-kaart
- Type-C-poort werkt slechts als USB 2.0
- geen audioklink
- PWM
- ondermaatse batterijduur
Getest: de Xiaomi Mi 9 smartphone. Testtoestel voorzien door TradingShenzhen.
Getest: de Xiaomi Mi 9 smartphone. Testtoestel voorzien door TradingShenzhen.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Xiaomi Mi 9 is een uitstekende smartphone die ongelooflijk veel waar voor het geld biedt ten opzichte van de andere vlaggenschip-smartphones. Het basismodel met 6 GB RAM en 64 GB opslag is reeds prima uitgerust volgens moderne standaarden. Toch is het model met 128 GB wellicht een betere keuze voor veel mensen, aangezien de Mi 9 geen ondersteuning biedt voor uitbreidbare opslag. 

Xiaomi heeft alle Mi 9-modellen uitgerust met uitstekende triple-camera's, een helder AMOLED-scherm met voorbeeldige kleurweergave en een stijlvolle en hoogwaardige, glazen behuizing. De nieuwe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC maakt de Mi 9 ook tot een van de krachtigste smartphones die je momenteel kan kopen. Dit zal echter veranderen naarmate er meer smartphones met een Snapdragon 855 verschijnen.

De Xiaomi Mi 9 is dé smartphone die je moet kopen als je op zoek bent naar een vlaggenschip-ervaring voor een beperkt budget. Het toestel biedt alles dat zijn concurrenten ook bieden, maar dan zonder een fortuin te kosten.

Hoewel we ook een aantal punten van kritiek hebben, over o.a. het ontbreken van een audioklink en ondersteuning voor microSD-kaart, is de Mi 9 in goed gezelschap, aangezien veel van zijn concurrenten deze features ook missen. De stijlvolle, glazen behuizing is ook gevoelig voor vingerafdrukken en de triple-camera aan de achterzijde zorgt ervoor dat het toestel wiebelt op een tafel, maar deze minpunten doen weinig af aan het feit dat dit voorlopig een van de beste vlaggenschip-smartphones is die je kan kopen in 2019.

Xiaomi Mi 9 - 27-03-2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing
85%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
95%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
46 / 60 → 76%
Gewicht
90%
Batterij
94%
Beeldscherm
91%
Gaming-performance
72 / 63 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
82 / 70 → 100%
Temperatuur
94%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
80%
Gemiddelde
82%
89%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 Smartphone
Manuel Masiero, 2019-03-30 (Update: 2019-03-31)