Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 Smartphone
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.0, 0.9 µm, HDR, tot [email protected] slow motion, [email protected]
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Honor View 20 | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.9 - 1414, n=641) | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Honor View 20 | |
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 1599, n=641) |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 94 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 593 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
95.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39 | Apple iPhone XR IPS, 1792x828, 6.10 | Huawei Mate 20 Pro OLED, 3120x1440, 6.30 | Honor View 20 LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.40 | OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.40 | Xiaomi Mi 8 AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -18% | -22% | -79% | -58% | -113% | -157% | |
Brightness middle | 593 | 672 13% | 576 -3% | 492 -17% | 437 -26% | 710 20% | 430 -27% |
Brightness | 587 | 641 9% | 582 -1% | 475 -19% | 442 -25% | 721 23% | 434 -26% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 92 -2% | 90 -4% | 94 0% | 95 1% | 97 3% | 94 0% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.4 | |||||
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 0.9 | 1.3 -44% | 1.3 -44% | 2.4 -167% | 2.21 -146% | 3.7 -311% | 5.09 -466% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 2 | 2.7 -35% | 3.5 -75% | 5.2 -160% | 4.27 -114% | 10.3 -415% | 8.05 -303% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.5 | 2.2 -47% | 1.6 -7% | 3.2 -113% | 2.1 -40% | 1.5 -0% | 3.3 -120% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.06 107% | 2.307 95% | 2.1 105% | 2.257 97% |
CCT | 6548 99% | 6868 95% | 6561 99% | 7125 91% | 6353 102% | 6611 98% | 7026 93% |
Contrast | 1920 | 1230 |
* ... kleiner is beter
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 245.1 Hz | ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling | |
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 245.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 245.1 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager). Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9725 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. |
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 2 ms stijging | |
↘ 2 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
4.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 2.4 ms stijging | |
↘ 2 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (7372 - 8024, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (663 - 21070, n=365) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10187 - 11388, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 14476, n=432) | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (3406 - 3537, n=14) | |
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4970, n=432) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 15299, n=568) | |
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 19989, n=717) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (85 - 167, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.5 - 322, n=835) | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (59 - 91, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 142, n=844) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (50 - 102, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.8 - 180, n=740) | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (46 - 85, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 117, n=748) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (35 - 71, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.87 - 117, n=603) | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (27 - 58, n=20) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 110, n=605) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (33.1 - 37.4, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.73 - 85.6, n=74) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (22.7 - 32.2, n=2) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.57 - 63, n=64) | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (24.5 - 36.3, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.88 - 71.6, n=62) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16) | |
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 462516, n=297) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
Honor View 20 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (239512 - 268271, n=12) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5600 - 293444, n=490) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (4486 - 4969, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 7649, n=100) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1075 - 1425, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (35 - 3575, n=148) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (84.4 - 120, n=17) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72) | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 375, n=660) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 25640, n=20) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72) | |
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 58632, n=830) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 59466, n=856) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) |
WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72) | |
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=298) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (260 - 316, n=2) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Xiaomi Mi 8 (Chrome 72) | |
Average of class Smartphone (165 - 362, n=347) | |
Xiaomi Mi 9 |
* ... kleiner is beter
Xiaomi Mi 9 | Huawei Mate 20 Pro | Honor View 20 | OnePlus 6T | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | Xiaomi Mi 8 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -5% | -3% | -33% | -28% | -35% | -28% | -61% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) | 60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 51.8 (17.1 - 71.9, n=32) | 51.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=564) | ||||
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB) | 73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 68.1 (18 - 87.1, n=32) | 69.5 (8.1 - 96.5, n=564) | ||||
Random Write 4KB | 165.32 | 157.84 -5% | 138.85 -16% | 22 -87% | 22.7 -86% | 21 -87% | 68.8 (8.77 - 165, n=43) -58% | 40.2 (0.14 - 319, n=935) -76% |
Random Read 4KB | 149.36 | 157.42 5% | 168.91 13% | 138.5 -7% | 135.16 -10% | 136.3 -9% | 133 (78.2 - 173, n=43) -11% | 63.1 (1.59 - 325, n=935) -58% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 388.27 | 196.39 -49% | 250.06 -36% | 204.4 -47% | 249.06 -36% | 207.8 -46% | 199 (133 - 388, n=43) -49% | 139 (2.99 - 1321, n=935) -64% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 666.06 | 853.28 28% | 847.48 27% | 735.3 10% | 811.17 22% | 693.2 4% | 703 (476 - 895, n=43) 6% | 363 (12.1 - 2037, n=935) -46% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi 9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Xiaomi Mi 8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Uit / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Inactief | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Belasting |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh | Honor View 20 4000 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | -35% | -58% | -11% | -30% | -76% | -24% | -22% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.61 9% | 0.95 -42% | 0.97 -45% | 0.7 -4% | 0.73 -9% | 1.5 -124% | 0.939 (0.58 - 1.96, n=19) -40% | 0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=927) -33% |
Idle Average * | 1.26 | 2.67 -112% | 2.17 -72% | 2.58 -105% | 1.1 13% | 1.53 -21% | 2.2 -75% | 1.506 (0.85 - 2.8, n=19) -20% | 1.758 (0.6 - 6.2, n=926) -40% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.29 | 2.69 -109% | 2.25 -74% | 2.63 -104% | 2.1 -63% | 2.07 -60% | 2.6 -102% | 1.799 (1 - 2.9, n=19) -39% | 2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=927) -58% |
Load Average * | 3.71 | 4.34 -17% | 4.47 -20% | 5.24 -41% | 4.2 -13% | 6.03 -63% | 6.1 -64% | 4.61 (3.64 - 5.8, n=19) -24% | 4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=921) -11% |
Load Maximum * | 9.3 | 5.66 39% | 6.15 34% | 8.73 6% | 8.3 11% | 9.18 1% | 10.9 -17% | 9.04 (7.49 - 11.9, n=19) 3% | 6.13 (1.2 - 14.2, n=921) 34% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh | Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 Pro 4200 mAh | Honor View 20 4000 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 8 3400 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batterijduur | 47% | 19% | 25% | 25% | -8% | 9% | |
Reader / Idle | 1650 | 2969 80% | 1747 6% | 1928 17% | 1936 17% | 1560 -5% | 1634 -1% |
H.264 | 1008 | 1011 0% | 854 -15% | 932 -8% | 903 -10% | 921 -9% | 897 -11% |
WiFi v1.3 | 546 | 910 67% | 767 40% | 969 77% | 865 58% | 483 -12% | 736 35% |
Load | 194 | 270 39% | 282 45% | 222 14% | 261 35% | 187 -4% | 215 11% |
Pro
Contra
Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.
De Xiaomi Mi 9 is een uitstekende smartphone die ongelooflijk veel waar voor het geld biedt ten opzichte van de andere vlaggenschip-smartphones. Het basismodel met 6 GB RAM en 64 GB opslag is reeds prima uitgerust volgens moderne standaarden. Toch is het model met 128 GB wellicht een betere keuze voor veel mensen, aangezien de Mi 9 geen ondersteuning biedt voor uitbreidbare opslag.
Xiaomi heeft alle Mi 9-modellen uitgerust met uitstekende triple-camera's, een helder AMOLED-scherm met voorbeeldige kleurweergave en een stijlvolle en hoogwaardige, glazen behuizing. De nieuwe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SoC maakt de Mi 9 ook tot een van de krachtigste smartphones die je momenteel kan kopen. Dit zal echter veranderen naarmate er meer smartphones met een Snapdragon 855 verschijnen.
De Xiaomi Mi 9 is dé smartphone die je moet kopen als je op zoek bent naar een vlaggenschip-ervaring voor een beperkt budget. Het toestel biedt alles dat zijn concurrenten ook bieden, maar dan zonder een fortuin te kosten.
Hoewel we ook een aantal punten van kritiek hebben, over o.a. het ontbreken van een audioklink en ondersteuning voor microSD-kaart, is de Mi 9 in goed gezelschap, aangezien veel van zijn concurrenten deze features ook missen. De stijlvolle, glazen behuizing is ook gevoelig voor vingerafdrukken en de triple-camera aan de achterzijde zorgt ervoor dat het toestel wiebelt op een tafel, maar deze minpunten doen weinig af aan het feit dat dit voorlopig een van de beste vlaggenschip-smartphones is die je kan kopen in 2019.
Xiaomi Mi 9 - 27-09-2019 v7
Manuel Masiero