Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite Smartphone: Big Bang for the Buck

Inclusief in-screen vingerafdrukscanner. Xiaomi's Mi 9 Lite beschikt over veel technologie en legt de lat aanzienlijk hoger voor $250 kostende smartphones. Ontdek in dit artikel of deze Chinese smartphone voldoende presteert.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt,
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Mi 9 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 360
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Geheugen
6144 MB 
, DDR4x, 2.133 MHz, dual-channel
Beeldscherm
6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitief, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glimmend: ja, HDR
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm koptelefoon poort, USB Type-C, Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, tot 256GB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingsmeter, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas, USB-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5, 2G GSM (B2/B3/B5/B8), 3G WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE FDD/TDE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.67 x 156.8 x 74.5
Batterij
4030 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2", 0.8µm) + 8MP + 2MP
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 0.8 µm)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2 luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: digitaal, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, modulaire USB stroomadapter, USB Type-C kabel, SIM tool, beschermhoes, MIUI Global 10.3.6 Stable, 12 Maanden Garantie, head SAR: 1,42 W/kg, body SAR: 1,4 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
179 g, Voeding: 80 g
Prijs
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vergleichsgeräte

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
80 %
12-2019
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
SD 710, Adreno 616
179 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
80 %
04-2019
Samsung Galaxy A50
Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3
166 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
79 %
10-2019
Nokia 7.2
SD 660, Adreno 512
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
77 %
06-2019
HTC Desire 19+
Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320
170 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.2"1520x720
78 %
11-2019
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
SD 665, Adreno 610
188 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2280x1080
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Adreno 616, SD 710, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
347 (min: 338, max: 351) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
344 (min: 336, max: 352) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 (min: 278, max: 302) MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
HTC Desire 19+
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
186 (min: 115, max: 228) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 11, max: 259) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 (min: 223, max: 308) MBit/s ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Adreno 616, SD 710, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
296 (min: 228, max: 370) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
272 (min: 250, max: 285) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
152 (min: 1, max: 254) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
HTC Desire 19+
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash
84 (min: 22, max: 191) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø347 (338-351)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø296 (228-370)
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500
GNSS - Garmin Edge 500

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
35 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
27 ∆E
62 ∆E
63 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
82.3 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite: 44.62 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 82.34 ∆E
ColorChecker
12.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite: 6.48 ∆E min: 1.91 - max: 17.11 ∆E
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - testkaart
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - testkaart (ingezoomd)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - testkaart (1 lux)
623
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
638
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 638 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 626.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.51 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 97 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 618 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6
95.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Samsung Galaxy A50
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Nokia 7.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
HTC Desire 19+
IPS, 1520x720, 6.2
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3
Screen
-85%
-175%
-134%
-172%
Brightness middle
618
644
4%
604
-2%
491
-21%
597
-3%
Brightness
626
628
0%
593
-5%
470
-25%
596
-5%
Brightness Distribution
97
91
-6%
92
-5%
84
-13%
93
-4%
Black Level *
0.4
0.33
0.52
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1
2.64
-164%
5.1
-410%
4.34
-334%
5.93
-493%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.4
9.23
-285%
10.3
-329%
8.17
-240%
9.42
-293%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.5
-56%
6.4
-300%
4.3
-169%
5.3
-231%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.024 109%
2.23 99%
2.302 96%
2.232 99%
CCT
6389 102%
6649 98%
8149 80%
7214 90%
7632 85%
Contrast
1510
1488
1148

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 240.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 240.4 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17886 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
2.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 1.6 ms stijging
↘ 1.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
680 Points ∼50%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
183 Points ∼13% -73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
680 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=45)
1362 Points ∼100% +100%
OpenCL Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
830 Points ∼48%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
601 Points ∼35% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
370 Points ∼21% -55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
830 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=53)
1738 Points ∼100% +109%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1515 Points ∼83%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1483 Points ∼81% -2%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1031 Points ∼57% -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1379 Points ∼76% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
1515 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=65)
1821 Points ∼100% +20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
394 Points ∼76%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
313 Points ∼60% -21%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
165 Points ∼32% -58%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
315 Points ∼61% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
394 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=65)
519 Points ∼100% +32%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
6719 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5827 Points ∼85% -13%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5917 Points ∼87% -12%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
5703 Points ∼84% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6534 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (6453 - 7460, n=6)
6824 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=492)
5837 Points ∼86% -13%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
8093 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
7029 Points ∼86% -13%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7753 Points ∼95% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8186 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (7041 - 9345, n=6)
8137 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=650)
6377 Points ∼78% -21%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2337 Points ∼89%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2207 Points ∼84% -6%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2268 Points ∼86% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2129 - 2406, n=3)
2291 Points ∼87% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=151)
2634 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1630 Points ∼56%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1141 Points ∼39% -30%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
901 Points ∼31% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1579 - 1635, n=3)
1615 Points ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=151)
2899 Points ∼100% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1747 Points ∼67%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1278 Points ∼49% -27%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1040 Points ∼40% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1675 - 1760, n=3)
1727 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=151)
2613 Points ∼100% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2462 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2266 Points ∼84% -8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2693 Points ∼100% +9%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1221 Points ∼45% -50%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2341 Points ∼87% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1840 - 2720, n=6)
2330 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=498)
2175 Points ∼81% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1842 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1188 Points ∼57% -36%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1256 Points ∼61% -32%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
489 Points ∼24% -73%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
981 Points ∼47% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1842 - 1875, n=6)
1860 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=498)
2074 Points ∼100% +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1951 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1328 Points ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1425 Points ∼73% -27%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
564 Points ∼29% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1867 - 2006, n=6)
1941 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=499)
1926 Points ∼99% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2447 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2241 Points ∼85% -8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2640 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1213 Points ∼46% -50%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2393 Points ∼91% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1862 - 2634, n=6)
2362 Points ∼89% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=528)
2085 Points ∼79% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2853 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1553 Points ∼54% -46%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2007 Points ∼70% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
817 Points ∼28% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1670 Points ∼58% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2841 - 2931, n=6)
2875 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=528)
2763 Points ∼96% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2752 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1667 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2120 Points ∼77% -23%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
881 Points ∼32% -68%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1790 Points ∼65% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2544 - 2859, n=6)
2736 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=528)
2322 Points ∼84% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2435 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2351 Points ∼89% -3%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2649 Points ∼100% +9%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1183 Points ∼45% -51%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2424 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2054 - 2847, n=6)
2457 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=578)
2062 Points ∼78% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1698 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1149 Points ∼66% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1181 Points ∼68% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
441 Points ∼25% -74%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
979 Points ∼56% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1698 - 1764, n=6)
1716 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=578)
1734 Points ∼100% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1820 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1296 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1347 Points ∼73% -26%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
512 Points ∼28% -72%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1128 Points ∼61% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1774 - 1927, n=6)
1837 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=579)
1658 Points ∼90% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2441 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2432 Points ∼92% 0%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2632 Points ∼100% +8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1177 Points ∼45% -52%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2452 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1878 - 2780, n=6)
2410 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=620)
1925 Points ∼73% -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2730 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1279 Points ∼46% -53%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1913 Points ∼69% -30%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
733 Points ∼26% -73%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1634 Points ∼59% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2725 - 2857, n=6)
2767 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=619)
2278 Points ∼82% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2660 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1430 Points ∼54% -46%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2037 Points ∼76% -23%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
800 Points ∼30% -70%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1765 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2490 - 2840, n=6)
2670 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=622)
1963 Points ∼74% -26%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13595 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14353 Points ∼77% +6%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
18094 Points ∼97% +33%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
17468 Points ∼93% +28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18698 Points ∼100% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13595 - 18181, n=6)
14925 Points ∼80% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=768)
15261 Points ∼82% +12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
39745 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16593 Points ∼42% -58%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
28898 Points ∼73% -27%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
12205 Points ∼31% -69%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24992 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (37157 - 40461, n=6)
39183 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=766)
25927 Points ∼65% -35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
27843 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16037 Points ∼56% -42%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
25513 Points ∼89% -8%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
13081 Points ∼46% -53%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23253 Points ∼81% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (26967 - 31801, n=6)
28731 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=766)
20383 Points ∼71% -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
56 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
39 fps ∼61% -30%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼79% -11%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼57% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (56 - 65, n=6)
63.5 fps ∼100% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=773)
43.9 fps ∼69% -22%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
65 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36 fps ∼55% -45%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
46 fps ∼71% -29%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
34 fps ∼52% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (54 - 65, n=6)
57.3 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=782)
30.5 fps ∼47% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
32 fps ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼71% -28%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼71% -28%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼62% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (32 - 33, n=6)
32.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=678)
25.9 fps ∼80% -19%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
20 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
21 fps ∼71% +5%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
21 fps ∼71% +5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼61% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (20 - 40, n=6)
29.7 fps ∼100% +49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=686)
21.8 fps ∼73% +9%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
23 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼65% -35%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (23 - 23, n=6)
23 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=541)
20.8 fps ∼90% -10%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
21 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼58% -38%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼58% -38%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼54% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (19 - 30, n=6)
22.3 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=543)
19 fps ∼85% -10%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
7.8 fps ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4.9 fps ∼44% -37%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.9 fps ∼44% -37%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
4.7 fps ∼42% -40%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼40% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5.9 - 11, n=6)
8.03 fps ∼72% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=290)
11.2 fps ∼100% +44%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5.1 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.1 fps ∼39% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼40% -37%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
1.5 fps ∼19% -71%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼35% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (4.9 - 7.8, n=6)
5.53 fps ∼69% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=288)
8.03 fps ∼100% +57%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
12 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.2 fps ∼49% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.7 fps ∼46% -36%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
7.3 fps ∼44% -39%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼46% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 17, n=6)
13 fps ∼78% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=294)
16.6 fps ∼100% +38%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9 fps ∼47% -36%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼45% -38%
HTC Desire 19+
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096
3.9 fps ∼20% -72%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.2 fps ∼42% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 14, n=6)
13.8 fps ∼72% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=293)
19.3 fps ∼100% +38%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.9 fps ∼64% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9 fps ∼64% -31%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.2 fps ∼51% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (13 - 13, n=6)
13 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=466)
14 fps ∼100% +8%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
12 fps ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.1 fps ∼64% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.2 fps ∼65% -32%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼52% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (11 - 16, n=6)
12.7 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=470)
12.5 fps ∼98% +4%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
172068 Points ∼55%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
157877 Points ∼50% -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
169222 Points ∼54% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (172068 - 205722, n=2)
188895 Points ∼60% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=95)
314806 Points ∼100% +83%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
1155 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
927 Points ∼80% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
926 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (1070 - 1307, n=6)
1140 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=710)
808 Points ∼70% -30%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
3100 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1957 Points ∼63% -37%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1916 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2906 - 3112, n=6)
3060 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=710)
2431 Points ∼78% -22%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2872 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2492 Points ∼79% -13%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2835 Points ∼90% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2872 - 3575, n=6)
3138 Points ∼100% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=710)
1810 Points ∼58% -37%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
5813 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5112 Points ∼88% -12%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5000 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (5603 - 5813, n=6)
5698 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=710)
3379 Points ∼58% -42%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710, Adreno 616, 6144
2780 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy A50
Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2193 Points ∼78% -21%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2240 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
  (2731 - 2970, n=6)
2808 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=710)
1719 Points ∼61% -38%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=172)
40.2 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
36.478 Points ∼91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (29 - 38.5, n=3)
34.7 Points ∼86% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.531 Points ∼76% -16%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
66.615 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (50.5 - 66.6, n=6)
61.4 Points ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
49.754 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=601)
46.4 Points ∼70% -30%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=156)
43.1 runs/min ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
38.7 runs/min ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (29 - 38.7, n=3)
34.8 runs/min ∼81% -10%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)
33.07 runs/min ∼77% -15%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
30.5 runs/min ∼71% -21%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=237)
69.9 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
69 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (57 - 72, n=6)
66.2 Points ∼95% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
62 Points ∼89% -10%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
51 Points ∼73% -26%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
12520 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (9771 - 12802, n=6)
11817 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
10322 Points ∼82% -18%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
9107 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=768)
7701 Points ∼62% -38%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=794)
9883 ms * ∼100% -175%
Motorola Moto G8 Plus (Chrome 78)
4504 ms * ∼46% -25%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)
3897 ms * ∼39% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite (Chrome 78)
3593.7 ms * ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 (3035 - 3800, n=6)
3370 ms * ∼34% +6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Mi 9 LiteSamsung Galaxy A50Nokia 7.2HTC Desire 19+Motorola Moto G8 PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 2.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-20%
-32%
-29%
-19%
-12%
-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.89 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
63.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
61.75 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
52.2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-18%
54 (28.6 - 70.2, n=15)
-15%
50.7 (1.7 - 87.1, n=509)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
73.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
83.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
81.85 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
72.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
69.7 (30.2 - 86, n=15)
-19%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=509)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
116.6
18.2
-84%
13.38
-89%
20.4
-83%
124.9
7%
76.2 (13.5 - 180, n=20)
-35%
33.2 (0.14 - 319, n=858)
-72%
Random Read 4KB
113.5
98.9
-13%
79.64
-30%
76.5
-33%
59.9
-47%
122 (88.4 - 173, n=20)
7%
57.2 (1.59 - 324, n=858)
-50%
Sequential Write 256KB
252.1
192.1
-24%
161.4
-36%
210.8
-16%
217.4
-14%
192 (143 - 257, n=20)
-24%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=858)
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
421.5
507.3
20%
290.83
-31%
288
-32%
302.5
-28%
494 (409 - 733, n=20)
17%
330 (12.1 - 1802, n=858)
-22%
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.4 (21-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.7 (23-31)
Arena of Valor
010203040506070Tooltip
; min: Ø60 (58-61)
; high HD: Ø60 (56-61)
Max. Belasting
 40.8 °C37.2 °C34 °C 
 40.5 °C37 °C34 °C 
 39.4 °C36.9 °C33.8 °C 
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.1 °C
32.6 °C35.7 °C39.7 °C
32.9 °C35.3 °C39.3 °C
33.4 °C35.8 °C38.3 °C
Maximum: 39.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  39.9 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.935.12529.132.53125.426.94029.426.95039.441.56327.326.88021.626.61002424.512520.732.816019.945.52001848.625016.851.931516.256.240015.959.250013.564.763013.967.180012.973.810001476.6125014.775.6160014.174.4200014.274.2250014.575.8315015.475.1400014.979.2500014.879.163001575.5800015.373.41000015.363.21250015.661.41600015.568.7SPL2787.4N0.970.1median 15.3median 68.7Delta1.311.141.239.237.53630.528.43329.237.635.928.624.523.923.222.823.421.925.820.336.6204519.152.71754.316.555.916.863.316.270.315.571.114.87014.171.715.572.715.574.114.572.913.871.813.771.213.871.61468.31464.814.163.514.257.714.351.862.127.18314.70.954.1median 15.5median 64.81.911.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 9 LiteMotorola Moto G8 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.8 / 1.2 / 1.6 Watt
Belasting midlight 2.6 / 4.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
HTC Desire 19+
3850 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-48%
-61%
-52%
-94%
-16%
-35%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.8
-0%
0.77
4%
1.3
-63%
1.7
-113%
0.772 (0.7 - 0.8, n=5)
3%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
-11%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.5
-25%
2.32
-93%
2
-67%
2.3
-92%
1.474 (1.2 - 2.07, n=5)
-23%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
-46%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
1.7
-6%
2.41
-51%
2.9
-81%
3.5
-119%
1.882 (1.6 - 2.31, n=5)
-18%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
-28%
Load Average *
2.6
5.9
-127%
4.44
-71%
3.6
-38%
4.7
-81%
3.33 (2.6 - 3.97, n=5)
-28%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
-57%
Load Maximum *
4.5
8.3
-84%
8.79
-95%
5
-11%
7.5
-67%
5.2 (4.5 - 5.82, n=5)
-16%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
-34%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
49h 17min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 51min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 14min
Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite
4030 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A50
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
HTC Desire 19+
3850 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
4000 mAh
Batterijduur
-11%
-22%
8%
8%
Reader / Idle
2957
1587
-46%
2002
-32%
H.264
891
869
-2%
996
12%
WiFi v1.3
734
701
-4%
570
-22%
795
8%
980
34%
Load
254
275
8%
302
19%

Pro

+ Degelijke systeemprestaties
+ In-screen vingerafdrukscanner
+ Goede prijs/prestaties verhouding

Contra

- Bepaalde instellingen kunnen alleen online met een Mi account worden gewijzigd
- Slechte prestaties van de camera bij weinig licht
- Vingerafdrukscanner is langzaam
Getest: Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite. Testmodel geleverd door notebooksbilliger
Getest: Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite. Testmodel geleverd door notebooksbilliger

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Xiaomi wil opnieuw bewijzen dat goede connectiviteit en behoorlijke prestaties niet noodzakelijkerwijs duur hoeven te zijn. De Mi 9 Lite heeft zijn concurrenten in veel van onze tests overtroffen en introduceert functies zoals de in-screen vingerafdruklezer en 2x optische zoom in zijn klasse van betaalbare smartphones, welke tot nu toe beperkt waren tot duurdere high-end apparaten.

Xiaomi slaagde erin om bijna alles goed te doen bij de Mi 9 Lite. Onze enige grote klacht is het feit dat om sommige instellingen te veranderen, een actieve internetverbinding is vereist.

De batterijlevensduur is goed, maar had iets beter kunnen zijn. De enige grote fout zit in de software. Hoewel lokalisatie uitstekend is, is het feit dat het wijzigen van bepaalde instellingen een actieve internetverbinding en een Xiaomi-account vereisen niet acceptabel.

Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite - 02-12-2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
84%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
48 / 70 → 68%
Gewicht
90%
Batterij
89%
Beeldscherm
90%
Gaming-performance
21 / 64 → 33%
Applicatie-performance
62 / 86 → 72%
Temperatuur
90%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
58%
Gemiddelde
74%
80%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite Smartphone: Big Bang for the Buck
Mike Wobker, 2019-12- 6 (Update: 2019-12- 6)