Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport OnePlus 6T Smartphone

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, 08-11-2018

The 6T element. OnePlus heeft de nieuwste concurrent voor vlaggenschip smartphones aangekondigd, die op subtiele wijze verschilt van zijn voorganger die we in augustus hebben getest. Bovenal heeft de 6T heeft een groter beeldscherm dankzij de kleinere inkeping, maar de hoofdtelefoonaansluiting ontbreekt nu. OnePlus heeft dezelfde camera's uit de 6 overgenomen en heeft zijn prijsstelling grotendeels hetzelfde gehouden, hoewel het basismodel nu $20 duurder is. Die extra uitgave levert je echter wel een dubbele opslag op, dus het is geen willekeurige prijsstijging. Ontdek in dit testrapport of de OnePlus 6T net zo voordelig is als zijn voorgangers.

OnePlus 6T (6 Serie)
Grafische kaart
Geheugen
6144 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.41 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, Capacitief touchscreen, Optisch AMOLED, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: Audio output via USB Type-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, Kompas, Vingerafdrukscanner, Gyroscoop, Hall sensor, Nabijheidssensor
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM, UMTS, LTE: Band – 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.2 x 157.5 x 74.8
Batterij
14.06 Wh, 3700 mAh Lithium-Ion, OnePlus Fast Charge
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix Primaire camera - Sony IMX 519, 20 MP, OIS, f/1.7, 1.22 μm pixelgrootte. Secundaire sensor: Sony IMX 376K, f/1.7, 1 μm pixelgrootte
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Sony IMX 371, 16 MP, f/2.0, 1 μm pixelgrootte
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1, Toetsenbord: Virtueel toetsenbord, Snellader, USB Type-A naar Type-C kabel, USB Type-C naar 3.5 mm adapter, Silicone behuizing, SIM tool, 24 Maanden Garantie, LTE: Cat. 16 downloads - 1 GBit/s; Cat. 13 uploads – 150 MBit/s, fanless
Gewicht
185 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T
OnePlus 6T

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% +4%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼93%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% -1%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼90% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=297)
205 MBit/s ∼30% -67%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼100% +36%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼95% +29%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼93% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼80% +9%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼73%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=297)
200 MBit/s ∼31% -58%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø629 (621-638)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø466 (241-497)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Fietsend
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Fietsend
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Brug
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 – Brug
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Overzicht
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Overzicht
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Fietsend
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Fietsend
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Brug
GPS test: OnePlus 6T – Brug

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen zonder nachtmodus
Foto genomen met nachtmodus
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
Foto genomen met de OnePlus 6T
433
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
454
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
437
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 454 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 441.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.93 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 437 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.21 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.307
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Screen
-6%
9%
-10%
28%
30%
Brightness middle
437
430
-2%
565
29%
477
9%
656
50%
569
30%
Brightness
442
437
-1%
571
29%
453
2%
659
49%
578
31%
Brightness Distribution
95
87
-8%
96
1%
86
-9%
88
-7%
95
0%
Black Level *
0.33
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.21
2.3
-4%
2.3
-4%
2.1
5%
1.7
23%
1.3
41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.27
4.6
-8%
4.8
-12%
8.2
-92%
2.8
34%
2.1
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
2.4
-14%
1.9
10%
1.6
24%
1.7
19%
1.6
24%
Gamma
2.307 95%
2.28 96%
2.16 102%
2.28 96%
1.998 110%
2.31 95%
CCT
6353 102%
6160 106%
6332 103%
6425 101%
6487 100%
6401 102%
Contrast
1445

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 240 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 240 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 240 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8773 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
12 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6 ms stijging
↘ 6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
13341 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43% -54%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points ∼100% +8%
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼56% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12493 - 14489, n=16)
13824 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=187)
4407 Points ∼31% -67%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
8995 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼80% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼76% -5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11244 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼60% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7934 - 9231, n=18)
8727 Points ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=237)
4249 Points ∼38% -53%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
2384 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼79% +58%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4774 Points ∼100% +100%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼40% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=18)
2430 Points ∼51% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=238)
1253 Points ∼26% -47%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
8487 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼63% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8701 - 9868, n=20)
7951 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2829 - 9868, n=246)
4511 Points ∼53% -47%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
10590 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼55% -45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points ∼93% -7%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=18)
10037 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13211, n=414)
4904 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
3681 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
3566 Points ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2546 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2713 Points ∼74% -26%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2723 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
2942 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2223 - 3764, n=20)
3132 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (611 - 4364, n=268)
1696 Points ∼46% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
5877 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
5547 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3792 Points ∼65% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5651 Points ∼96% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4828 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
3109 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4209 - 8206, n=20)
5575 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8206, n=268)
1451 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
5189 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
4937 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3420 Points ∼66% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4555 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4121 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P20 Pro
3070 Points ∼59% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5189, n=20)
4704 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 5189, n=271)
1345 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
3374 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 6
3555 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2561 Points ∼72% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2721 Points ∼77% -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2961 Points ∼83% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
2940 Points ∼83% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=19)
3098 Points ∼87% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4407, n=283)
1672 Points ∼47% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
8397 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 6
8014 Points ∼77% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4797 Points ∼46% -43%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7609 Points ∼73% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
10374 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro
3503 Points ∼34% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=19)
7762 Points ∼75% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=283)
2042 Points ∼20% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
6310 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 6
6267 Points ∼94% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4018 Points ∼60% -36%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5438 Points ∼82% -14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
6667 Points ∼100% +6%
Huawei P20 Pro
3360 Points ∼50% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4054 - 6568, n=19)
5798 Points ∼87% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=284)
1709 Points ∼26% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
3537 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼95% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼68% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3027 Points ∼84% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼81% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=19)
3304 Points ∼91% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4183, n=343)
1630 Points ∼45% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
5241 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼68% -32%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3726 Points ∼71% -29%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5241, n=19)
4969 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=343)
1169 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
4734 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3544 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=19)
4456 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=351)
1117 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
3483 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼72% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼73% -27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2713 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3668, n=19)
3155 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4150, n=375)
1524 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
8272 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -44%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
7055 Points ∼85% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼40% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=19)
7835 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=375)
1603 Points ∼19% -81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
6336 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼61% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
5205 Points ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4529 - 6454, n=19)
5870 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6454, n=383)
1363 Points ∼22% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
35022 Points ∼95%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼93% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼71% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
27717 Points ∼75% -21%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼61% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (27817 - 36794, n=17)
34083 Points ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 36794, n=528)
12685 Points ∼35% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
84998 Points ∼53%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼51% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼29% -45%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
159735 Points ∼100% +88%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼21% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 84998, n=17)
81178 Points ∼51% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=528)
17508 Points ∼11% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
64534 Points ∼83%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼80% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼51% -38%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
77599 Points ∼100% +20%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼39% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56669 - 65330, n=17)
62042 Points ∼80% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=529)
14737 Points ∼19% -77%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
152 fps ∼67%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼66% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼65% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼66% -1%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
226 fps ∼100% +49%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼54% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=18)
144 fps ∼64% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=553)
30.4 fps ∼13% -80%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
60 fps ∼98%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=17)
61.5 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=556)
24.6 fps ∼40% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼55%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼62% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼69% +25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼66% +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
107 fps ∼100% +81%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼57% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=17)
74.1 fps ∼69% +26%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=475)
16.3 fps ∼15% -72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
59 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 75, n=17)
56 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=478)
15.6 fps ∼26% -74%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼85%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼81% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼68% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼84% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
69.3 fps ∼100% +17%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼56% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 60.9, n=18)
54.7 fps ∼79% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=338)
13.9 fps ∼20% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
53 fps ∼90%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼92% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼41% -55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼95% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
58.9 fps ∼100% +11%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼61% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (26 - 59, n=17)
48.5 fps ∼82% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=341)
13.6 fps ∼23% -74%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
22 fps ∼69%
OnePlus 6
23 fps ∼72% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
25 fps ∼78% +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
32.1 fps ∼100% +46%
Huawei P20 Pro
14 fps ∼44% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 25, n=6)
19.8 fps ∼62% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 59, n=51)
10.1 fps ∼31% -54%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
14 fps ∼86%
OnePlus 6
14 fps ∼86% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14 fps ∼86% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
16.3 fps ∼100% +16%
Huawei P20 Pro
8.6 fps ∼53% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (14 - 14, n=6)
14 fps ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 22, n=51)
6.09 fps ∼37% -56%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
34 fps ∼72%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼74% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
40 fps ∼85% +18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
47 fps ∼100% +38%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼49% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 40, n=6)
30.2 fps ∼64% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 59, n=51)
14.2 fps ∼30% -58%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
37 fps ∼97%
OnePlus 6
38 fps ∼100% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
38 fps ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
36.8 fps ∼97% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼61% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 38, n=6)
36.5 fps ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 63, n=51)
15.8 fps ∼42% -57%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
35 fps ∼88%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼70% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
40 fps ∼100% +14%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼58% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=18)
34.3 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=270)
9.67 fps ∼24% -72%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
31 fps ∼84%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼86% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼38% -55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
31 fps ∼84% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼59% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (17 - 37, n=18)
28.9 fps ∼78% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=273)
8.73 fps ∼24% -72%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
35.34 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6
35.26 (min: 20.31, max: 62.64) fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
24.45 (min: 9.63, max: 65.63) fps ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (24.5 - 35.3, n=4)
31.4 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1.24 - 651, n=35)
33.3 fps ∼94% -6%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
29.68 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6
26.15 (min: 15.32, max: 59.39) fps ∼88% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
10.52 (min: 5, max: 27.66) fps ∼35% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15.8 - 29.7, n=4)
22.3 fps ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (2.79 - 606, n=33)
29.7 fps ∼100% 0%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
32.86 fps ∼88%
OnePlus 6
28.35 (min: 16.41, max: 60.76) fps ∼76% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro
11.8 (min: 5.55, max: 28.23) fps ∼32% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21.3 - 32.9, n=4)
27.7 fps ∼74% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2.03 - 739, n=31)
37.3 fps ∼100% +14%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
294488 Points ∼97%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼88% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼83% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼81% -16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
302955 Points ∼100% +3%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼69% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=20)
274906 Points ∼91% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=162)
115755 Points ∼38% -61%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
228939 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼96% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points ∼98% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=16)
224225 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 250848, n=382)
74754 Points ∼32% -67%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
4716 Score ∼100%
OnePlus 6
4710 Score ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
1980 Score ∼42% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4598 - 4731, n=4)
4689 Score ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (437 - 5025, n=38)
1820 Score ∼39% -61%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
1398 Points ∼81%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼80% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼64% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼81% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1731 Points ∼100% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼74% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=17)
1351 Points ∼78% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=490)
691 Points ∼40% -51%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
7969 Points ∼51%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼51% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼41% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
15659 Points ∼100% +96%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼24% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=17)
7793 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=490)
1698 Points ∼11% -79%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
4344 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1815 Points ∼42% -58%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=17)
3566 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=490)
1219 Points ∼28% -72%
System (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
8156 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼70% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼55% -21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼72% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11675 Points ∼100% +43%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼51% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8613, n=17)
7809 Points ∼67% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=490)
2466 Points ∼21% -70%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
4458 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼88% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼67% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼88% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4895 Points ∼100% +10%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼67% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3489 - 4693, n=17)
4111 Points ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=494)
1230 Points ∼25% -72%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 6T
1201 Points ∼50%
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼49% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼62% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2407 Points ∼100% +100%
Huawei P20 Pro
887 Points ∼37% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5)
1179 Points ∼49% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=75)
701 Points ∼29% -42%

Legende

 
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
273.01 Points ∼100% +217%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
87.695 Points ∼32% +2%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 89.5, n=18)
75.1 Points ∼28% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
71.172 Points ∼26% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼25% -19%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼21% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=411)
36.1 Points ∼13% -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +156%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
17026 Points ∼39% +1%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=19)
15280 Points ∼35% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼34% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% -21%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼27% -31%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=548)
5466 Points ∼13% -68%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=567)
11574 ms * ∼100% -407%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼33% -69%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼27% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=19)
2939 ms * ∼25% -29%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
2445 ms * ∼21% -7%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼18% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼5% +74%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
98 Points ∼63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 101, n=10)
77.5 Points ∼50%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
75 Points ∼48%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points ∼41%
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=53)
60.7 Points ∼39%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
347 Points ∼100% +33%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼75%
OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66)
252 Points ∼73% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=18)
223 Points ∼64% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
211 Points ∼61% -19%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼52% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼47% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=276)
108 Points ∼31% -58%

* ... kleiner is beter

OnePlus 6TOnePlus 6Samsung Galaxy S9 PlusSony Xperia XZ2 PremiumHuawei P20 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
2%
-4%
161%
81%
-59%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
67.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
63.9 (51.3 - 72.4, n=4)
45.2 (3.4 - 87.1, n=313)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
79.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
79.1 (75.4 - 83.2, n=4)
63.5 (8.2 - 96.5, n=313)
Random Write 4KB
22
21.8
-1%
22.74
3%
21.75
-1%
160.49
630%
92.5 (20 - 164, n=15)
320%
15.4 (0.14 - 164, n=596)
-30%
Random Read 4KB
138.5
137
-1%
129.68
-6%
135.99
-2%
144.33
4%
141 (132 - 157, n=15)
2%
37.5 (1.59 - 173, n=597)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
204.4
201.4
-1%
204.94
0%
170.98
-16%
196.69
-4%
202 (192 - 212, n=15)
-1%
78.4 (2.99 - 246, n=597)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
735.3
725.6
-1%
818.69
11%
748.59
2%
831.82
13%
768 (692 - 853, n=15)
4%
226 (12.1 - 895, n=597)
-69%
Shadow Fight 3
 InstellingenWaarde
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Asphalt 9: Legends
 InstellingenWaarde
 High Quality30 fps
 Standard / low30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 48.6 °C45.2 °C41.7 °C 
 46.8 °C44.5 °C42.3 °C 
 45.8 °C43.9 °C41.8 °C 
Maximum: 48.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 44.5 °C
36 °C38.9 °C42 °C
36.1 °C39.4 °C38.9 °C
37.1 °C40.3 °C41.5 °C
Maximum: 42 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  42.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22 to 326 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.3292538.131.33128.5284031.428.55036.634.26324.628.68024.126.510020.523.11251927.316016.939.920019.151.425016.652.431513.9554001559.550014.659.163012.357.480011.858.6100011.863.8125011.968.6160011.469.5200011.270250011.573.3315011.370.5400010.968.7500010.568.6630010.766800010.665.21000010.566.41250010.655.71600010.638.9SPL64.357.22480.5N16.810.40.545.3median 11.8median 59.5Delta2.28.422.924.324.224.125.12522.230.227.739.917.420.717.517.214.918.61419.514.732.112.243.413.649.513.153.910.857.29.754.29.357.19.6628.2668.168.1869.97.771.37.875.17.874.47.869.47.864.47.857.48.159.78.157.98.147.98.129.257.920.681.69.90.343.5median 8.1median 57.42.211hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 6TOnePlus 6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 6T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 2.1 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.2 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
19%
-26%
-8%
15%
-23%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.6
14%
0.68
3%
0.67
4%
1
-43%
0.84
-20%
0.826 (0.42 - 1.8, n=17)
-18%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=630)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.1
1
9%
0.95
14%
2.5
-127%
1.4
-27%
1.54
-40%
1.802 (1 - 2.9, n=17)
-64%
1.723 (0.6 - 6.2, n=629)
-57%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
1.6
24%
1.09
48%
2.51
-20%
1.7
19%
1.57
25%
2.18 (1.5 - 3.5, n=17)
-4%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=630)
5%
Load Average *
4.2
4.3
-2%
4.58
-9%
4.3
-2%
4.6
-10%
2.47
41%
4.86 (3.7 - 7.2, n=17)
-16%
4.03 (0.8 - 10.8, n=624)
4%
Load Maximum *
8.3
8.6
-4%
5.16
38%
6.87
17%
6.7
19%
2.49
70%
9.2 (6.2 - 12.3, n=17)
-11%
5.73 (1.2 - 14.2, n=624)
31%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
32h 16min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 03min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 21min
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
OnePlus 6
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Batterijduur
-9%
-26%
-30%
-18%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1936
1806
-7%
1343
-31%
1347
-30%
1305
-33%
1727
-11%
H.264
903
791
-12%
674
-25%
520
-42%
801
-11%
784
-13%
WiFi v1.3
865
762
-12%
521
-40%
547
-37%
742
-14%
744
-14%
Load
261
246
-6%
237
-9%
235
-10%
223
-15%
345
32%

Pro

+ krachtig
+ veel opslagruimte en RAM
+ goede GPS-nauwkeurigheid
+ moderne en snelle software
+ 60 FPS-gaming
+ indrukwekkende batterijlevensduur
+ robuuste behuizing

Contra

- geen hoofdtelefoonaansluiting
- langzame Wi-Fi module
- vingerafdruksensor op het beeldscherm is onbetrouwbaar
- geen microSD-kaartslot
- VoLTE wordt niet ondersteund op alle netwerken
- Matige luidspreker
- behuizing is niet stof- en waterbestendig
Getest: OnePlus 6T. Testmodel geleverd door OnePlus Germany.
Getest: OnePlus 6T. Testmodel geleverd door OnePlus Germany.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Ja, de OnePlus 6T is een echte concurrent voor vlaggenschepen die alle essentiële eigenschappen bezit en tegelijkertijd een geweldige batterijlevensduur heeft. Naast regionale prijsverschillen heeft de 6T een iets hogere startprijs dan zijn voorganger, maar je krijgt wel dubbel zoveel opslagruimte voor slechts $20 meer. Helaas is de vingerafdruksensor op het scherm langzamer en minder nauwkeurig bij het herkennen van vingerafdrukken dan bij de sensor aan de achterzijde van de voorganger.

We zouden de belangrijkste eigenschappen van de 6T eerder willen uitleggen, maar er is nog veel meer te vertellen over het apparaat. De 6T behoudt bijvoorbeeld het razendsnelle besturingssysteem, de ingebouwde donkere modus en het minimalistische ontwerp van zijn voorgangers, terwijl de batterij ook een langere levensduur heeft. Snel opladen werkt nog steeds uitstekend.

De OnePlus 6T is een elegant en robuust vlaggenschip dat goede prestaties combineert met de toonaangevende batterijlevensduur. De geïntegreerde vingerafdruklezer en de beslissing van OnePlus om de koptelefoonaansluiting te verwijderen, voorkomen echter dat we de 6T verkiezen boven zijn voorganger.

De OnePlus 6T is waarschijnlijk geen waardevolle upgrade voor OnePlus 6-bezitters, vooral omdat de belangrijkste nieuwe functie minder nuttig zijn dan wat het zou moeten vervangen. We verwachten dat de technologie die de vingerafdruksensoren op het scherm ondersteunt in de komende twaalf tot achttien maanden aanzienlijk zal verbeteren, maar op dit moment weegt het toegevoegde gemak van een vingerafdruksensor onder een scherm niet op tegen de nadelen. OnePlus heeft de 6T uitgerust met veel van de hardware van zijn voorganger, dus de verschillen die u opmerkt, zijn mogelijk alleen softwaregerelateerd of, nog erger, alleen een placebo.

 

De kleinere beeldschermrand is ook geen reden om te schakelen, vooral omdat OnePlus de hoofdtelefoonaansluiting heeft verwijderd. Kortom, de OnePlus 6T is een geweldige smartphone die serieus concurreert met duurdere smartphones. We raden je echter aan om bij zijn voorganger te blijven als je deze al bezet en het oudere model te overwegen als je erover denkt zijn opvolger te kopen.

OnePlus 6T - 08-11-2018 v6
Florian Schmitt

Behuizing
90%
Toetsenbord
70 / 75 → 93%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
47 / 60 → 78%
Gewicht
89%
Batterij
97%
Beeldscherm
90%
Gaming-performance
54 / 63 → 85%
Applicatie-performance
78 / 70 → 100%
Temperatuur
85%
Luidheid
100%
Camera
88%
Gemiddelde
82%
89%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport OnePlus 6T Smartphone
Florian Schmitt, 2018-11- 8 (Update: 2018-11- 8)