Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Huawei Mate 20 Pro Smartphone

Allen Ngo, Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, 22-10-2018

Live test – De technische specificaties van de Huawei Mate 20 Pro staat vol met vlaggenschip hardware, waaronder de nieuwe Kirin 980 SoC, de op dit moment snelste LTE modem in een consumenten smartphone, draadloos laden en een vingerafdrukscanner onder het beeldscherm. Dit testrapport bekijkt al dit en nog meer om te bepalen of de indrukwekkende specificaties van de Mate 20 Pro vertaald zijn naar indrukwekkende prestaties in de praktijk.

Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Mate 20 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Dual-Core NPU
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G76 MP10, GPU Turbo 2.0
Geheugen
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Beeldscherm
6.3 inch 13:6, 3120 x 1440 pixel 545 PPI, capacitief, 10 multi-touch punten, OLED, HDR, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 112.8 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C, Card Reader: Nano-Speicherkarte (bis zu 256 GB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: nabijheidssensor, kompas, gyroscoop, Hall-sensor, infrarood, laser, kleurtemperatuur, OTG
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge, UMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 21, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.6 x 156.9 x 72.4
Batterij
4200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Huawei Super Charge - 40 W, Qi draadloos opladen, Gesprekstijd 2G (volgens fabrikant): 41 h, Gesprekstijd 3G (volgens fabrikant): 30 h, Standby 2G (volgens fabrikant): 502 h, Standby 3G (volgens fabrikant): 555 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix Hoofdcamera: 40 MP, f/1.8. Ultra-wide-angle sensor: 20 MP, f/2.2. Telefoto sensor: 8 MP, f/2.4, OIS. Dual-tone LED flits, AI ondersteuning.
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, SuperCharge-oplader, USB-kabel, headerset, SIM-tool, snelstarthandleiding, EMUI 9.0, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR: 0.4 W/kg, IP68-certificering, fanless
Gewicht
189 g, Voeding: 125 g
Prijs
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

From left to right: Huawei Mate 9, Mate 20 Pro and Mate 10 Pro
From left to right: Huawei Mate 9, Mate 20 Pro and Mate 10 Pro
The Mate 20 Pro’s Hybrid slot
The Mate 20 Pro’s 40 W charger

Size Comparison

Topside: IR transmitter, Microphone
Topside: IR transmitter, Microphone
Left-hand side:
Left-hand side:
Right-hand side: Volume rocker, power button
Right-hand side: Volume rocker, power button
Bottom edge: Microphone, card slot, USB 3.1 Type-C, Microphone
Bottom edge: Microphone, card slot, USB 3.1 Type-C, Microphone
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
656 MBit/s ∼97% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼96% +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼91% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼91%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼73% -20%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
609 MBit/s ∼90% -1%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
338 MBit/s ∼50% -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=300)
209 MBit/s ∼31% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% -5%
LG G7 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 6
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
612 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
225 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=300)
203 MBit/s ∼29% -71%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Finale Firmware iperf 3.1.3: Ø615 (532-642)
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø490 (100-534)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø696 (647-714)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Finale Firmware iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (289-805)
Mate 10 Pro
Mate 10 Pro
Mate 20 Pro
Mate 20 Pro
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Wide-Angle
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Hybrid Zoom
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Hybrid Zoom
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Hybrid Zoom
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: 10x Digital zoom
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Wide-Angle
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera - Night mode
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Wide-Angle
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Main Camera
Huawei Mate 20 Pro: Wide-Angle
560
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
605
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
559
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 620 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 581.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.84 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 576 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.18
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
OLED, 2160x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
LG G7 ThinQ
IPS, 3120x1440, 6.1
OnePlus 6
Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.28
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Screen
-10%
-22%
-40%
1%
-110%
-35%
-62%
Brightness middle
576
629
9%
565
-2%
477
-17%
656
14%
974
69%
430
-25%
429
-26%
Brightness
582
636
9%
571
-2%
453
-22%
659
13%
975
68%
437
-25%
432
-26%
Brightness Distribution
90
94
4%
96
7%
86
-4%
88
-2%
96
7%
87
-3%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.33
0.49
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.3
1.7
-31%
2.3
-77%
2.1
-62%
1.7
-31%
5.4
-315%
2.3
-77%
3.39
-161%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.5
3.6
-3%
4.8
-37%
8.2
-134%
2.8
20%
13.1
-274%
4.6
-31%
5.25
-50%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
2.4
-50%
1.9
-19%
1.6
-0%
1.7
-6%
5
-213%
2.4
-50%
3.3
-106%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.15 102%
2.16 102%
2.28 96%
1.998 110%
2.31 95%
2.28 96%
2.238 98%
CCT
6561 99%
6337 103%
6332 103%
6425 101%
6487 100%
7480 87%
6160 106%
7135 91%
Contrast
1445
1988

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 245.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 245.1 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8758 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8938 Points ∼62%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8572 Points ∼59% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14417 Points ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
14299 Points ∼99% +60%
LG G7 ThinQ
13497 Points ∼94% +51%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
8938 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=190)
4475 Points ∼31% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
10024 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6792 Points ∼60% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼80% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8522 Points ∼76% -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11244 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8548 Points ∼76% -15%
LG G7 ThinQ
9029 Points ∼80% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9965 - 10024, n=2)
9995 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=241)
4284 Points ∼38% -57%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3378 Points ∼71%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1898 Points ∼40% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼79% +12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2457 Points ∼51% -27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4774 Points ∼100% +41%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2441 Points ∼51% -28%
LG G7 ThinQ
2448 Points ∼51% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (3360 - 3378, n=2)
3369 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=242)
1264 Points ∼26% -63%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9225 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6932 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼57% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8178 Points ∼88% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7360 Points ∼79% -20%
OnePlus 6
8282 Points ∼89% -10%
LG G7 ThinQ
7717 Points ∼83% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (9225 - 9326, n=2)
9276 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (9063 - 9868, n=249)
4531 Points ∼49% -51%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
12535 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8439 Points ∼65% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼45% -54%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
9858 Points ∼76% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8967 Points ∼69% -28%
OnePlus 6
9630 Points ∼74% -23%
LG G7 ThinQ
9503 Points ∼73% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (12535 - 13531, n=2)
13033 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (3681 - 13531, n=417)
4944 Points ∼38% -61%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4364 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3002 Points ∼68% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2546 Points ∼58% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2713 Points ∼62% -38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2723 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2227 Points ∼51% -49%
OnePlus 6
3566 Points ∼81% -18%
LG G7 ThinQ
3416 Points ∼78% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4364 - 4439, n=2)
4402 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (611 - 4439, n=271)
1707 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4250 Points ∼75%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3034 Points ∼54% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3792 Points ∼67% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5651 Points ∼100% +33%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4828 Points ∼85% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4209 Points ∼74% -1%
OnePlus 6
5547 Points ∼98% +31%
LG G7 ThinQ
5322 Points ∼94% +25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4250 - 4319, n=2)
4285 Points ∼76% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (75 - 8206, n=271)
1470 Points ∼26% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4275 Points ∼87%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3027 Points ∼61% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3420 Points ∼69% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4555 Points ∼92% +7%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4121 Points ∼83% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3512 Points ∼71% -18%
OnePlus 6
4937 Points ∼100% +15%
LG G7 ThinQ
4735 Points ∼96% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4275 - 4315, n=2)
4295 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (93 - 5189, n=274)
1363 Points ∼28% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4407 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2983 Points ∼67% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2561 Points ∼58% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2721 Points ∼61% -38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2961 Points ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2145 Points ∼48% -51%
OnePlus 6
3555 Points ∼80% -19%
LG G7 ThinQ
3109 Points ∼70% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4407 - 4493, n=2)
4450 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=286)
1683 Points ∼38% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5854 Points ∼56%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3306 Points ∼32% -44%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4797 Points ∼46% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7609 Points ∼73% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
10374 Points ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
5922 Points ∼57% +1%
OnePlus 6
8014 Points ∼77% +37%
LG G7 ThinQ
7882 Points ∼76% +35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5854 - 5893, n=2)
5874 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=286)
2065 Points ∼20% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5456 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3228 Points ∼48% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4018 Points ∼60% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5438 Points ∼82% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
6667 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4232 Points ∼63% -22%
OnePlus 6
6267 Points ∼94% +15%
LG G7 ThinQ
5877 Points ∼88% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5456 - 5511, n=2)
5484 Points ∼82% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=287)
1729 Points ∼26% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4183 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2871 Points ∼68% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼59% -41%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3620 Points ∼86% -13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3027 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2118 Points ∼50% -49%
OnePlus 6
3432 Points ∼82% -18%
LG G7 ThinQ
3255 Points ∼78% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4183 - 4216, n=2)
4200 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (549 - 4216, n=346)
1639 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4206 Points ∼81%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2844 Points ∼55% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5190 Points ∼100% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3726 Points ∼71% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3742 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 6
5212 Points ∼100% +24%
LG G7 ThinQ
5006 Points ∼96% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4206 - 4232, n=2)
4219 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 5241, n=346)
1187 Points ∼23% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4201 Points ∼89%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2850 Points ∼60% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4734 Points ∼100% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3544 Points ∼75% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3197 Points ∼68% -24%
OnePlus 6
4673 Points ∼99% +11%
LG G7 ThinQ
4471 Points ∼94% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4201 - 4228, n=2)
4215 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (86 - 4734, n=354)
1133 Points ∼24% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4150 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
2896 Points ∼69% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
2541 Points ∼61% -39%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2713 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2176 Points ∼52% -48%
OnePlus 6
3452 Points ∼83% -17%
LG G7 ThinQ
3150 Points ∼75% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4150 - 4215, n=2)
4183 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=378)
1532 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5305 Points ∼64%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3353 Points ∼41% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8219 Points ∼100% +55%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
7055 Points ∼85% +33%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6554 Points ∼79% +24%
OnePlus 6
8252 Points ∼100% +56%
LG G7 ThinQ
7633 Points ∼92% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5245 - 5305, n=2)
5275 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8312, n=378)
1624 Points ∼20% -69%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4996 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3239 Points ∼51% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼62% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
5492 Points ∼87% +10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
5205 Points ∼83% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4529 Points ∼72% -9%
OnePlus 6
6304 Points ∼100% +26%
LG G7 ThinQ
5799 Points ∼92% +16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4975 - 4996, n=2)
4986 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (69 - 6454, n=386)
1380 Points ∼22% -72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
36755 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22629 Points ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼71% -29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
36762 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
27717 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
30765 Points ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 6
34191 Points ∼93% -7%
LG G7 ThinQ
27817 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (35932 - 36755, n=2)
36344 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=533)
12822 Points ∼35% -65%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
67730 Points ∼42%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
34008 Points ∼21% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼29% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
81502 Points ∼51% +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
159735 Points ∼100% +136%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
77003 Points ∼48% +14%
OnePlus 6
81269 Points ∼51% +20%
LG G7 ThinQ
80534 Points ∼50% +19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (67730 - 67956, n=2)
67843 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=533)
17894 Points ∼11% -74%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
57047 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
30590 Points ∼39% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼51% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
64152 Points ∼83% +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
77599 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
57711 Points ∼74% +1%
OnePlus 6
62241 Points ∼80% +9%
LG G7 ThinQ
56669 Points ∼73% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (56722 - 57047, n=2)
56885 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=534)
15022 Points ∼19% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
120 fps ∼53%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
112 fps ∼50% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼65% +23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
150 fps ∼66% +25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
226 fps ∼100% +88%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
102 fps ∼45% -15%
OnePlus 6
150 fps ∼66% +25%
LG G7 ThinQ
144 fps ∼64% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (120 - 134, n=2)
127 fps ∼56% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=557)
31 fps ∼14% -74%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
61 fps ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
58 fps ∼94% -5%
OnePlus 6
60 fps ∼98% -2%
LG G7 ThinQ
60 fps ∼98% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (61 - 62, n=2)
61.5 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=560)
24.7 fps ∼40% -60%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
73 fps ∼68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
54 fps ∼50% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼69% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
71 fps ∼66% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
107 fps ∼100% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
54 fps ∼50% -26%
OnePlus 6
66 fps ∼62% -10%
LG G7 ThinQ
63 fps ∼59% -14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (73 - 87, n=2)
80 fps ∼75% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=479)
16.6 fps ∼16% -77%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
42 fps ∼71%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
56 fps ∼95% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼98% +38%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
59 fps ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
51 fps ∼86% +21%
OnePlus 6
58 fps ∼98% +38%
LG G7 ThinQ
41 fps ∼69% -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (42 - 60, n=2)
51 fps ∼86% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=482)
15.8 fps ∼27% -62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29 fps ∼42%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
37 fps ∼53% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼68% +62%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
58 fps ∼84% +100%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
69.3 fps ∼100% +139%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
32 fps ∼46% +10%
OnePlus 6
56 fps ∼81% +93%
LG G7 ThinQ
51 fps ∼74% +76%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (29 - 55, n=2)
42 fps ∼61% +45%
Average of class Smartphone (1.3 - 88, n=342)
14.2 fps ∼20% -51%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
26 fps ∼44%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
38 fps ∼65% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼41% -8%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
56 fps ∼95% +115%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
58.9 fps ∼100% +127%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
29 fps ∼49% +12%
OnePlus 6
54 fps ∼92% +108%
LG G7 ThinQ
26 fps ∼44% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (26 - 51, n=2)
38.5 fps ∼65% +48%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 110, n=345)
13.8 fps ∼23% -47%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
19 fps ∼59%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
14 fps ∼44% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
25 fps ∼78% +32%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
32.1 fps ∼100% +69%
OnePlus 6
23 fps ∼72% +21%
LG G7 ThinQ
13 fps ∼40% -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
19 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.7 - 59, n=54)
10.4 fps ∼32% -45%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
13 fps ∼80%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8.5 fps ∼52% -35%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
14 fps ∼86% +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
16.3 fps ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 6
14 fps ∼86% +8%
LG G7 ThinQ
14 fps ∼86% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
13 fps ∼80% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 22, n=54)
6.23 fps ∼38% -52%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
18 fps ∼38%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
23 fps ∼49% +28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
40 fps ∼85% +122%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
47 fps ∼100% +161%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼74% +94%
LG G7 ThinQ
20 fps ∼43% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
18 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 59, n=54)
14.7 fps ∼31% -18%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
33 fps ∼87%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
24 fps ∼63% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
38 fps ∼100% +15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
36.8 fps ∼97% +12%
OnePlus 6
38 fps ∼100% +15%
LG G7 ThinQ
37 fps ∼97% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
33 fps ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 63, n=54)
16.2 fps ∼43% -51%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
31 fps ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
21 fps ∼53% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼70% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
35 fps ∼88% +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
40 fps ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
25 fps ∼63% -19%
OnePlus 6
35 fps ∼88% +13%
LG G7 ThinQ
33 fps ∼83% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (31 - 32, n=2)
31.5 fps ∼79% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.72 - 54, n=274)
9.88 fps ∼25% -68%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16 fps ∼43%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
22 fps ∼59% +38%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼38% -12%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
37 fps ∼100% +131%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
31 fps ∼84% +94%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
24 fps ∼65% +50%
OnePlus 6
32 fps ∼86% +100%
LG G7 ThinQ
17 fps ∼46% +6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (16 - 30, n=2)
23 fps ∼62% +44%
Average of class Smartphone (1.1 - 58, n=277)
8.88 fps ∼24% -44%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼83%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
16.82 (min: 5.26, max: 61.1) fps ∼48% -42%
OnePlus 6
35.26 (min: 20.31, max: 62.64) fps ∼100% +21%
LG G7 ThinQ
30.49 (min: 9.86, max: 49.99) fps ∼86% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
29.1 fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 651, n=36)
32.4 fps ∼92% +11%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼59%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
6.67 (min: 2.29, max: 86.53) fps ∼23% -61%
OnePlus 6
26.15 (min: 15.32, max: 59.39) fps ∼91% +55%
LG G7 ThinQ
17.42 (min: 10.81, max: 36.84) fps ∼60% +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
16.9 fps ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 606, n=34)
28.8 fps ∼100% +70%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼71%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
8.37 (min: 3.32, max: 81.15) fps ∼23% -67%
OnePlus 6
28.35 (min: 16.41, max: 60.76) fps ∼79% +11%
LG G7 ThinQ
28.33 (min: 16.3, max: 60.18) fps ∼78% +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
25.6 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 739, n=32)
36.1 fps ∼100% +41%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
300617 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
212278 Points ∼70% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼83% -17%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
246366 Points ∼81% -18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
302955 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
288062 Points ∼95% -4%
OnePlus 6
266686 Points ∼88% -11%
LG G7 ThinQ
256276 Points ∼85% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (300617 - 302465, n=2)
301541 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=165)
117556 Points ∼39% -61%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
250848 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
177341 Points ∼70% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼88% -11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
226124 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
232931 Points ∼92% -7%
OnePlus 6
230421 Points ∼91% -8%
LG G7 ThinQ
223464 Points ∼88% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (250848 - 254229, n=2)
252539 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=385)
75866 Points ∼30% -70%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5025 Score ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1704 Score ∼34% -66%
OnePlus 6
4710 Score ∼94% -6%
LG G7 ThinQ
4598 Score ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
5025 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 5025, n=39)
1773 Score ∼35% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1424 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
1234 Points ∼71% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼64% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
1400 Points ∼81% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1731 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
1288 Points ∼74% -10%
OnePlus 6
1386 Points ∼80% -3%
LG G7 ThinQ
1374 Points ∼79% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1424 - 1430, n=2)
1427 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=494)
695 Points ∼40% -51%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6273 Points ∼40%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3657 Points ∼23% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼41% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
7743 Points ∼49% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
15659 Points ∼100% +150%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7965 Points ∼51% +27%
OnePlus 6
7949 Points ∼51% +27%
LG G7 ThinQ
7906 Points ∼50% +26%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5455 - 6273, n=2)
5864 Points ∼37% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=494)
1728 Points ∼11% -72%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6283 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
4142 Points ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼42% -58%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3704 Points ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
1815 Points ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3521 Points ∼56% -44%
OnePlus 6
3799 Points ∼60% -40%
LG G7 ThinQ
3744 Points ∼60% -40%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (5929 - 6283, n=2)
6106 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=494)
1237 Points ∼20% -80%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8604 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
5244 Points ∼45% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼55% -25%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
8418 Points ∼72% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
11675 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6556 Points ∼56% -24%
OnePlus 6
8228 Points ∼70% -4%
LG G7 ThinQ
8070 Points ∼69% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (8602 - 8604, n=2)
8603 Points ∼74% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=494)
2491 Points ∼21% -71%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4687 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
3147 Points ∼64% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼67% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
4288 Points ∼88% -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
4895 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3923 Points ∼80% -16%
OnePlus 6
4308 Points ∼88% -8%
LG G7 ThinQ
4257 Points ∼87% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (4466 - 4687, n=2)
4577 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=498)
1246 Points ∼25% -73%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1571 Points ∼65%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro
788 Points ∼33% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1481 Points ∼62% -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
2407 Points ∼100% +53%
OnePlus 6
1169 Points ∼49% -26%
LG G7 ThinQ
1176 Points ∼49% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
1571 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼29% -56%

Legende

 
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
LG G7 ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
The Huawei Mate 20 Pro live review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.
The Huawei Mate 20 Pro live review. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Huawei Mate 20 Pro vindt de smartphone niet opnieuw uit, maar Huawei heeft wel op de juiste vlakken verbeteringen aangebracht om een goede smartphone nog beter te maken. De nieuwe Kirin 980 zou wel eens de snelste SoC in een Android smartphone van 2018 kunnen zijn. De verbeteringen aan de camera maken het een waardige upgrade van de Mate 10 Pro. Kortom, Huawei heeft het op alle vlakken goed gedaan met de Mate 20 Pro.

De smartphone heeft ook een groot 6.3-inch OLED beeldscherm met HDR-ondersteuning. Verder is er snelle LTE Cat. 21 ondersteuning, Bluetooth 5.0 en NFC. Er is zelfs 802.11ac Wi-Fi met een MIMO-antenne, draadloos opladen en IP68-certificering.


Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Huawei Mate 20 Pro Smartphone
Allen Ngo, Daniel Schmidt, 2018-10-22 (Update: 2018-10-22)