Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Motorola Moto G7 Plus Smartphone

Harde concurrentie. Je moet niet altijd 800 euro uitgeven om een smartphone te krijgen die goede foto's kan maken. Althans, dat is de boodschap die Motorola met de Moto G7 Plus en zijn prijskaartje van 300 euro wilt geven. De G7 Plus beschikt over een optisch gestabiliseerde 16 MP-camera en intelligente softwarefunctionaliteiten.
Stefan Schomberg, 👁 Florian Schmitt (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Motorola Moto G7 Plus (Moto G7 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 8 x 1.8 GHz, Kryo 260
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 509
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.20 inch 19:9, 2270 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 47.4 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: Tot 512 GB microSD-kaarten, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, Gyroscoop, Afstandssensor, USB 3.0 Type-C-poort, OTG en PD (Power Delivery)
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B19. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B18, B19, B20, B26, B28, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.3 x 157 x 75.3
Batterij
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Camera
Webcam: 12 MP, 1.25 μm, LED-flash
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/1.7, Phase Detection Auto-focus, OIS, Dual LED Flash, video's aan max. 2160p/30 FPS. Hoofdcamera: 5.0 MP, f/2.2, Scherptediepte (Secondary Camera)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 12.0 MPix, video's aan max. 1080p/30 FPS
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo – telefoonluidspreker en aan onderzijde van het toestel, Toetsenbord: Virtueel, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 24 Maanden Garantie, LTE Cat 13/5 – 400 Mbps/75 Mbps. SAR-waardes: hoofd - 0.788 W/kg. ExFAT-ondersteuning. DRM Widevine L1-certificaat, fanless
Gewicht
176 g, Voeding: 88 g
Prijs
299.99 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
zoekrelatie.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus

Formaat Vergelijking

160.4 mm 76.6 mm 7.8 mm 175 g160 mm 75.5 mm 8 mm 167 g159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 75.4 mm 8.3 mm 175 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=295, last 2 years)
399 MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (164min - 362max) MBit/s ∼80% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼78% +8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (138min - 294max) MBit/s ∼72%
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 (252min - 263max) MBit/s ∼65% -10%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 (136min - 231max) MBit/s ∼46% -37%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=295, last 2 years)
406 MBit/s ∼100% +22%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (314min - 341max) MBit/s ∼82%
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
330 (63min - 342max) MBit/s ∼81% -1%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, SD 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (265min - 284max) MBit/s ∼69% -16%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
207 (162min - 243max) MBit/s ∼51% -38%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360319324329314330333335332333336333334331331330330319328334334338332338337333337336331341318314331336332338338341342337337341338341337340336337334338341321340340341337339338338337280275281281281278280281279274280271279276280275265280278277275281275274279278282279279284225185221197200206220226196210205203163174162218234184215187243239194210227216234202208210319324329314330333335332333336333334331331330330319328334334338332338337333337336331341318314331336332338338341342337337341338341337340336337334338341321340340341337339338338337280275281281281278280281279274280271279276280275265280278277275281275274279278282279279284225185221197200206220226196210205203163174162218234184215187243239194210227216234202208210268291288288288285288291288288284290290292279290290284294291286285290287291286291284289290257261257262256261261255258257261255262262256263258252256262256262256259262257260254260259362342324164311321327326325324336331336305319339303314317325321267317302350324347334336341193182217198193172166148211161205193193177167231225199212181167141151160155136184170212160Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (314-341)
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (314-342)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (265-284)
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø207 (162-243)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø288 (268-294)
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø259 (252-263)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø320 (164-362)
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø182 (136-231)
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overzicht
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overzicht
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Lus
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Lus
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Brug
GPS-test: Garmin Edge 520 - Brug
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Overzicht
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Overzicht
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Lus
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Lus
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Brug
GPS-test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Brug

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Passport: de onderkant van elk kleurvlak toont de referentiekleur
ColorChecker Passport: de onderkant van elk kleurvlak toont de referentiekleur
Een foto van ons testbeeld
Een foto van ons testbeeld
Ons testbeeld in detail
Ons testbeeld in detail
536
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 573 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 525 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 85 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 537 cd/m²
Contrast: 926:1 (Zwart: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.41 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.099
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.20
HTC U12 Life
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.00
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6.00
Honor 8X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.50
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.90
Screen
-5%
42%
-5%
34%
Brightness middle
537
468
-13%
570
6%
484
-10%
761
42%
Brightness
525
452
-14%
565
8%
469
-11%
723
38%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
93
9%
93
9%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.58
0.62
-7%
0.55
5%
0.69
-19%
Contrast
926
755
-18%
880
-5%
1103
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.41
6.09
5%
1.5
77%
7.3
-14%
2.4
63%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.86
10.23
6%
3.6
67%
11.1
-2%
5.2
52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.7
6.8
-1%
1.2
82%
7.4
-10%
1.8
73%
Gamma
2.099 105%
2.708 81%
2.07 106%
2.16 102%
2.21 100%
CCT
8310 78%
6972 93%
6504 100%
8534 76%
6312 103%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 2315 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2315 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 2315 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9713 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
24 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 9 ms stijging
↘ 13 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (24.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
30 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 7 ms stijging
↘ 23 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼53%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1338 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼60% +14%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1614 Points ∼64% +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
822 Points ∼32% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1323 - 1506, n=11)
1351 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (412 - 5099, n=79, last 2 years)
2531 Points ∼100% +89%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼65%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4914 Points ∼64% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼57% -11%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5557 Points ∼72% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4011 Points ∼52% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4781 - 5426, n=11)
4960 Points ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1163 - 14895, n=79, last 2 years)
7737 Points ∼100% +55%
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼64%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4465 Points ∼67% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼60% -6%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4083 Points ∼61% -5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3763 Points ∼56% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4278 - 5041, n=11)
4505 Points ∼67% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2166 - 12228, n=66, last 2 years)
6676 Points ∼100% +56%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼77%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6412 Points ∼65% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼57% -26%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8939 Points ∼90% +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5712 Points ∼58% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6040 - 7618, n=11)
6624 Points ∼67% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=235, last 2 years)
9901 Points ∼100% +30%
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼80%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5730 Points ∼73% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼69% -14%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7141 Points ∼91% +14%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4875 Points ∼62% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5611 - 6277, n=11)
5833 Points ∼75% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=269, last 2 years)
7807 Points ∼100% +24%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼50%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19777 Points ∼50% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼39% -22%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
20468 Points ∼52% +5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
16818 Points ∼43% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (19525 - 20404, n=11)
19846 Points ∼50% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=220, last 2 years)
39384 Points ∼100% +102%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼37%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20778 Points ∼37% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼27% -26%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21533 Points ∼38% +3%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
18449 Points ∼33% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (20610 - 21067, n=11)
20839 Points ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=220, last 2 years)
56664 Points ∼100% +170%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼69%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16924 Points ∼74% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼61% -12%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17450 Points ∼76% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
12845 Points ∼56% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (15766 - 19365, n=11)
17020 Points ∼74% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=220, last 2 years)
22977 Points ∼100% +46%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼63%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼63% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼65% +3%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
28 fps ∼50% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (30 - 40, n=12)
34.3 fps ∼61% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)
55.8 fps ∼100% +59%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼35%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼35% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼38% +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
30 fps ∼29% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (35 - 36, n=12)
35.6 fps ∼35% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=218, last 2 years)
103 fps ∼100% +186%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼34%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼34% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼43% +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
13 fps ∼29% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (13 - 18, n=12)
15 fps ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)
44.1 fps ∼100% +194%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼26%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼26% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼35% +31%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
14 fps ∼23% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (16 - 16, n=12)
16 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)
60.4 fps ∼100% +278%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼28%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼28% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼38% +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
9.4 fps ∼27% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.7 - 12, n=12)
9.47 fps ∼27% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=214, last 2 years)
34.5 fps ∼100% +252%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼24%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼24% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼34% +40%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
9.8 fps ∼24% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6.3 - 10, n=12)
9.68 fps ∼23% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=214, last 2 years)
41.3 fps ∼100% +313%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼28%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼28% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼30% +7%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.3 fps ∼25% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.1 - 7.4, n=12)
5.96 fps ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=213, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼100% +260%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼25%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼25% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps ∼31% +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.6 fps ∼23% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6.3 - 6.3, n=12)
6.3 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=213, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼100% +294%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼26%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.7 fps ∼26% +2%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5.2 fps ∼24% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4.9 - 6.9, n=9)
5.59 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=274, last 2 years)
21.6 fps ∼100% +286%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼22%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼24% +11%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.6 fps ∼19% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.4 - 6.1, n=9)
5.93 fps ∼24% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=274, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼100% +359%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼14%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.6 fps ∼25% +80%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.1 fps ∼29% +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2 - 4.4, n=9)
3.27 fps ∼23% +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=275, last 2 years)
14.3 fps ∼100% +615%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼23%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼22% -4%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼26% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2.2 - 3.5, n=9)
2.36 fps ∼24% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=274, last 2 years)
9.85 fps ∼100% +328%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼53%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
116595 Points ∼52% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼55% +4%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
140188 Points ∼63% +19%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
90347 Points ∼40% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (115565 - 138661, n=11)
118863 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (64824 - 462516, n=31, last 2 years)
223193 Points ∼100% +90%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
92015 Points ∼63%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
95287 Points ∼65% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
87728 Points ∼60% -5%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
112870 Points ∼78% +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
71635 Points ∼49% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (92015 - 125213, n=10)
98051 Points ∼67% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51390 - 293444, n=17, last 2 years)
145591 Points ∼100% +58%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)
88.6 Points ∼100% +94%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼54% +5%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
47.012 Points ∼53% +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
45.778 Points ∼52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=11)
45.3 Points ∼51% -1%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
44.314 Points ∼50% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=212, last 2 years)
17077 Points ∼100% +104%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼54% +10%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
9121 Points ∼53% +9%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
9095 Points ∼53% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=12)
8665 Points ∼51% +4%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼100%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
4757.5 ms * ∼100% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 5066, n=12)
4687 ms * ∼98% +2%
Honor 8X
4247.7 ms * ∼89% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)
4167 ms * ∼87% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼86% +14%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=203, last 2 years)
77.6 Points ∼100% +44%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
58 Points ∼75% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼73% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (46 - 61, n=9)
54.4 Points ∼70% +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼70%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (165 - 285, n=23, last 2 years)
174 Points ∼100% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼97% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (147 - 184, n=8)
158 Points ∼91% +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
156 Points ∼90%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
147 Points ∼84% -6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Motorola Moto G7 PlusHTC U12 LifeSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Honor 8XMotorola Moto G6 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-20%
-12%
-5%
-19%
53%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.6
272.79
-4%
295.76
4%
283.87
0%
286.64
1%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=164)
-3%
729 (41.9 - 2037, n=280, last 2 years)
157%
Sequential Write 256KB
208.7
209.45
0%
104.87
-50%
169.98
-19%
216.09
4%
178 (40 - 274, n=164)
-15%
314 (11.9 - 1321, n=280, last 2 years)
50%
Random Read 4KB
76.6
56.71
-26%
83.98
10%
49.54
-35%
58.39
-24%
58.3 (11.4 - 149, n=164)
-24%
130 (13.5 - 325, n=280, last 2 years)
70%
Random Write 4KB
73.1
16.2
-78%
15.45
-79%
59.87
-18%
62.76
-14%
29 (3.4 - 147, n=164)
-60%
115 (4.97 - 330, n=280, last 2 years)
57%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
75.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
77.5 (21.1 - 108, n=143)
-6%
76 (13.4 - 154, n=182, last 2 years)
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
68.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
58.5 (11.2 - 83.3, n=143)
-6%
58 (1.7 - 83.3, n=182, last 2 years)
-7%
Game Compare - Asphalt 9: Legends
051015202530354045505560396060525551928271113182027232519283026281823292114575791010982929302829302829302729302930292829292930282929292929292927282928292728292828292829302729302929292729273028302827292828292828272929272728302829292928302730283028292828272829292828302929282928292825272826282727272828282627292828282926272825272829282728262720362829302827292929292928292929282830302828292829293030272328282628282929282927282929282928282927292828292628273028202828282729282928282723606051365272927262891919282718263029242729242822263029282035510910910232829282828282926292928292729282926272928282827302529262927292626302829282829282829262929293029302627262827262828282827292630282727292828282828282728262729252339606052555192827111318202723251928302628182329211457579101098292930282930282930272930293029282929293028292929292929292728292829272829282829282930272930292929272927302830282729282829282827292927272830282929292830273028302829282827282929282830292928292829282527282628272727282828262729282828292627282527282928272826272036282930282729292929292829292928283030282829282929303027232828262828292928292728292928292828292729282829262827302820282828272928292828272360605136527292726289191928271826302924272924282226302928203551091091023282928282828292629292829272928292627292828282730252926292729262630282928282928282926292929302930262726282726282828282729263028272729282828282828272826272925233960605255519282711131820272325192830262818232921145757910109829293028293028293027293029302928292929302829292929292929272829282927282928282928293027293029292927292730283028272928282928282729292727283028292929283027302830282928282728292928283029292829282928252728262827272728282826272928282829262728252728292827282627203628293028272929292929282929292828303028282928292930302723282826282829292829272829292829282829272928282926282730282028282827292829282827Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26.8 (3-60)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26 (3-60)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø26.8 (3-60)
Game Compare - Shadow Fight 3
0510152025303540455055601923536106614210111215359594560113957603713443533312918386058295760586058606059604847305060465760606060605550163260585759591953606057604750144717575959606060605958595456575260606060484757575858575857565160606060595425560606060606060596058576059605858555659515656505653576060Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; 1.16.1: Ø47.1 (1-60)
Max. Belasting
 32 °C33 °C34 °C 
 32 °C32.6 °C34.6 °C 
 32.2 °C32.5 °C34.1 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 33 °C
31.6 °C33.3 °C33 °C
31.6 °C33 °C33.4 °C
32.2 °C32.6 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 33.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.5 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  42.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.434.72530.432.3312732.34033.1295034.631.56329.126.9802423.910023.621.712521.231.416021.140.620018.841.125018.747.231517.650.140016.657.150015.861.763015.864.580015.369.6100016.370.8125014.771.316001668.620001570.7250014.768.7315014.769.4400014.372.9500014.868.9630015.162800015.257.91000014.456.81250014.462.71600014.462.8SPL6063.75527.580.9N12.915.59.30.947median 15.3median 62.7Delta1.39.930.740.32531.926.828.326.333.629.840.927.425.12125.419.527.518.825.519.237.617.642.116.94415.852.81555.91559.614.764.114.86714.670.314.36913.469.614.469.914.471.814.876.2158014.869.814.766.5157014.968.115.25315.741.126.884.80.956.5median 15median 66.51.210.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G7 PlusHonor 8X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Honor 8X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.7 / 2.1 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.1 / 7.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
9%
17%
1%
27%
-4%
6%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.7
36%
0.71
35%
0.92
16%
0.5
55%
0.944 (0.6 - 1.75, n=12)
14%
0.933 (0.37 - 2.5, n=231, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.5
12%
1.36
20%
2.3
-35%
1.78
-5%
2.22 (1.4 - 4.48, n=12)
-31%
1.843 (0.82 - 3.94, n=231, last 2 years)
-8%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
2.5
-19%
1.47
30%
2.32
-10%
1.81
14%
2.54 (2 - 4.5, n=12)
-21%
2.12 (0.85 - 4.2, n=231, last 2 years)
-1%
Load Average *
5.1
4.7
8%
5.13
-1%
4.37
14%
3.3
35%
4.51 (3.65 - 7.92, n=12)
12%
4.43 (2.1 - 8.4, n=231, last 2 years)
13%
Load Maximum *
7.9
7.4
6%
7.89
-0%
6.13
22%
5.14
35%
7.37 (5.1 - 13.6, n=12)
7%
7.22 (3.16 - 12.3, n=231, last 2 years)
9%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 29min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 16min
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Batterijduur
-16%
9%
19%
24%
Reader / Idle
1467
1846
H.264
809
836
3%
542
-33%
WiFi v1.3
715
603
-16%
605
-15%
852
19%
702
-2%
Load
196
273
39%
404
106%

Pro

+ uitstekende camera's
+ 4K-video mogelijk
+ HD-videostreaming
+ degelijke Wi-Fi-snelheden
+ geen SoC-throttling
+ hoogwaardig design
+ veel waar voor het geld

Contra

- het touchscreen klinkt hol
- scherm met blauwachtige tint
- GPU zou sneller mogen
Getest: de Motorola Moto G7 Plus smartphone. Testtoestel voorzien door Motorola Germany.
Getest: de Motorola Moto G7 Plus smartphone. Testtoestel voorzien door Motorola Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Motorola Moto G7 Plus is een fantastisch toestel die herdefinieert wat je mag verwachten van een mid-range smartphone. Voor minder dan 300 euro heeft Motorola een smartphone afgeleverd met uitstekende camera, een degelijk scherm en bijna alle features van moderne vlaggenschip-smartphones. De G7 Plus ziet er dankzij zijn moderne design stijlvol uit en de bouwkwaliteit is eveneens prima.

De Motorola Moto G7 Plus is een uitstekende smartphone die mensen serieus zou doen twijfelen over de aankoop van een duur vlaggenschip-toestel. Zo goed is hij.

Helaas heeft de G7 Plus ook een aantal zwakke punten. Het touchscreen klinkt redelijk hol, al kan het hier ook gaan om een probleem met ons specifieke testtoestel. De GPU is ook wat aan de trage kant en Motorola lijkt de smartphone te hebben uitgerust met een scherm van mindere kwaliteit dan zijn voorganger. We zouden ook graag een grotere batterij hebben gezien, al slaagt de inbegrepen oplader er nu wel in om het toestel in minder dan een uur volledig op te laden. Kort gezegd: de Motorola Moto G7 Plus is een uitzonderlijke smartphone voor de prijs en een uitstekend alternatief voor moderne - en aanzienlijk duurdere - vlaggenschip-smartphones.

Pricecompare

Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 3621 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018
contact me via: @aldersonaj
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Motorola Moto G7 Plus Smartphone
Stefan Schomberg, 2019-02-24 (Update: 2019-02-28)