Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Note20: Niet altijd beter dan de Note10

Gedimd. De Samsung Galaxy Note20 is meer dan 300 euro goedkkoper dan het Ultra-model. Als we naar de specificaties kijken, vallen ons enkele besparingen op, maar het is niet meteen duidelijk of de duurdere Note20 zijn meerprijs echt waard is of - nog belangrijker - of de Note20 de moeite waard is om over te schakelen van de Note10.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger,
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Galaxy Note Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Geheugen
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Beeldscherm
6.7 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, native pen support, Super AMOLED Plus, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, glimmend: ja, HDR, 60 Hz
Opslag
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 221.6 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: USB-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: gyroscoop, accelerometer, afstandssensor, hall-sensor, geomagnetische sensor, barometer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1,800, and 1,900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1,900, and 2,100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 66, 38, 39, 40, and 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.3 x 161.6 x 75.2
Batterij
4300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (1/1.76", f/1.8, OIS) + 12 MPix (ultra-groothoeklens, 1/2.55", f/2.2) + 64 MPix (hybride tele, 1/1.72", f/2.0, OIS), Camera2-API-Level: Full
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (f/2.2)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo-luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: on-screen, 24 Maanden Garantie, DRM Widevine L1, IP68-gecertificeerd, hoofd-SAR: W/kg, lichaam-SAR: W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Gewicht
192 g
Prijs
925 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
88 %
10-2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
192 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
86 %
03-2020
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3168x1440
88 %
04-2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
88 %
04-2020
OnePlus 8 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
199 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.78"3168x1440
89 %
12-2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
09-2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
89 %
09-2020
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
208 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.9"3088x1440
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (912min - 1092max) MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (468min - 602max) MBit/s ∼53% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
883 (834min - 919max) MBit/s ∼87% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (802min - 879max) MBit/s ∼86%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (346min - 881max) MBit/s ∼75% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (550min - 597max) MBit/s ∼57% -33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=597)
280 MBit/s ∼28% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (923min - 995max) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (584min - 715max) MBit/s ∼66% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
833 (418min - 883max) MBit/s ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
816 (403min - 832max) MBit/s ∼84% -2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (461min - 625max) MBit/s ∼61% -29%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (264min - 571max) MBit/s ∼53% -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=597)
266 MBit/s ∼28% -68%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø863 (802-879)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø819 (418-883)

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

WeitwinkelWeitwinkelZoom (5-fach)UltraweitwinkelLow-Light
ColorChecker
28.4 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
55.4 ∆E
55.7 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
41 ∆E
29.5 ∆E
58.1 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
54.5 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20: 38.83 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 58.06 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note20: 6.19 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 14.34 ∆E
614
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
637
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 637 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 620.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.52 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 95 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 610 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Super AMOLED Plus, 2400x1080, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Dynamic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.9
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
OnePlus 8 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.78
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.7
Screen
-2%
-22%
26%
-5%
42%
36%
-38%
Brightness middle
610
764
25%
860
41%
790
30%
592
-3%
796
30%
753
23%
778
28%
Brightness
621
757
22%
878
41%
790
27%
605
-3%
779
25%
762
23%
775
25%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
96
1%
97
2%
96
1%
94
-1%
96
1%
99
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
2.66
-11%
4.5
-88%
1.4
42%
2.5
-4%
0.68
72%
0.9
62%
4.4
-83%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.3
5.65
-31%
10.4
-142%
3.4
21%
5.5
-28%
1.55
64%
1.6
63%
8.7
-102%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.8
3.2
-14%
2.4
14%
1.9
32%
2.6
7%
1.1
61%
1.5
46%
5.6
-100%
Gamma
2.09 105%
2.073 106%
2 110%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.237 98%
2.24 98%
2.26 97%
CCT
6368 102%
6326 103%
6466 101%
6466 101%
6173 105%
6310 103%
6415 101%
7250 90%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 250 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 250 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 250 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17581 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
3.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 1.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
9.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4.8 ms stijging
↘ 4.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5364 Points ∼98%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5364 - 5532, n=2)
5448 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 5532, n=31)
2001 Points ∼37% -63%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4667 Points ∼99%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4667 - 4789, n=2)
4728 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=32)
1731 Points ∼37% -63%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2766 Points ∼82%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3360 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3338 Points ∼99% +21%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3318 Points ∼99% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼91% +11%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=5)
2800 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=118)
1936 Points ∼58% -30%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
917 Points ∼99%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
911 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
906 Points ∼98% -1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
909 Points ∼98% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼84% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=5)
929 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=118)
550 Points ∼59% -40%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9491 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9443 Points ∼77%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12228 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
8648 Points ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=357)
4918 Points ∼40%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13279 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13186 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
12280 Points ∼92%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (12557 - 12561, n=2)
12559 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=420)
5027 Points ∼38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4278 Points ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4261 Points ∼87%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3898 Points ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4791 - 4965, n=2)
4878 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=420)
1539 Points ∼32%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10008 Points ∼88%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11387 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10952 Points ∼96% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11153 Points ∼98% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼91% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10008 - 11784, n=5)
10612 Points ∼93% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=520)
5945 Points ∼52% -41%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
13627 Points ∼95%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13360 Points ∼93% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
13142 Points ∼91% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13471 Points ∼94% -1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼97% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (13627 - 14760, n=5)
14391 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=678)
6520 Points ∼45% -52%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3104 Points ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3843 Points ∼99% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3830 Points ∼99% +23%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3888 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3104 - 3230, n=5)
3154 Points ∼81% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=173)
2662 Points ∼68% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6136 Points ∼74%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8076 Points ∼98% +32%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8173 Points ∼99% +33%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8279 Points ∼100% +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼77% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6136 - 8783, n=5)
7254 Points ∼88% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=173)
2989 Points ∼36% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5042 Points ∼76%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6444 Points ∼97% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6578 Points ∼99% +30%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6618 Points ∼100% +31%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼84% +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5042 - 6355, n=5)
5599 Points ∼85% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=173)
2686 Points ∼41% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4143 Points ∼74%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼93% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5277 Points ∼95% +27%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5506 Points ∼99% +33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +35%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=5)
4284 Points ∼77% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=524)
2219 Points ∼40% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
870 Points ∼9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼100% +974%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9356 Points ∼100% +975%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9379 Points ∼100% +978%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼71% +665%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (870 - 9190, n=5)
7112 Points ∼76% +717%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=524)
2134 Points ∼23% +145%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7076 Points ∼87%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼98% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7986 Points ∼98% +13%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8111 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼79% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=5)
7083 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=525)
1993 Points ∼25% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4247 Points ∼78%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼95% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4283 Points ∼78% +1%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5480 Points ∼100% +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼94% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=5)
4240 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=556)
2135 Points ∼39% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11868 Points ∼93%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼99% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12694 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12665 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼63% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11868, n=5)
10329 Points ∼81% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=556)
2875 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8485 Points ∼87%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼98% +13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8823 Points ∼90% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9807 Points ∼100% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼72% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7385 - 8485, n=5)
7798 Points ∼80% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=556)
2417 Points ∼25% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3993 Points ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4582 Points ∼92% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4895 Points ∼98% +23%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4987 Points ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼98% +23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼81% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=5)
4091 Points ∼82% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=605)
2100 Points ∼42% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8005 Points ∼96%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8045 Points ∼97% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8299 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8106 Points ∼98% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼78% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼73% -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8005 - 8469, n=5)
8260 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9008, n=605)
1801 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6544 Points ∼91%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7012 Points ∼98% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7157 Points ∼100% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7117 Points ∼99% +9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼85% -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼76% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6544 - 6896, n=5)
6733 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=606)
1716 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4077 Points ∼81%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5054 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4729 Points ∼94% +16%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4928 Points ∼98% +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼97% +20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼76% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3846 - 4124, n=5)
3990 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=648)
1970 Points ∼39% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
11272 Points ∼91%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11458 Points ∼92% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12394 Points ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11371 Points ∼92% +1%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼62% -32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼91% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=5)
9004 Points ∼73% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=647)
2384 Points ∼19% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8097 Points ∼89%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8866 Points ∼97% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9123 Points ∼100% +13%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8811 Points ∼97% +9%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼75% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼87% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8097, n=5)
6920 Points ∼76% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=650)
2048 Points ∼22% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
39771 Points ∼92%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28147 Points ∼65% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
32384 Points ∼75% -19%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
32240 Points ∼74% -19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +9%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=4)
37265 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=792)
15527 Points ∼36% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
87223 Points ∼42%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145567 Points ∼71% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
150281 Points ∼73% +72%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
149017 Points ∼72% +71%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% -14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +136%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 87223, n=4)
74951 Points ∼36% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=790)
26885 Points ∼13% -69%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
68943 Points ∼71%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
75632 Points ∼78% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
82937 Points ∼86% +20%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
82562 Points ∼85% +20%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% -6%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +40%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 68943, n=4)
61100 Points ∼63% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=790)
20998 Points ∼22% -70%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
191 fps ∼67%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼70% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
203 fps ∼71% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
206 fps ∼72% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +50%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (145 - 200, n=5)
187 fps ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=794)
45.4 fps ∼16% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼67%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼67% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼66% -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=5)
81.8 fps ∼91% +36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=803)
31.4 fps ∼35% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
114 fps ∼73%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼78% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
122 fps ∼78% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
126 fps ∼80% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% -7%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (96 - 126, n=5)
109 fps ∼69% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=699)
26.8 fps ∼17% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼68%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼66% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +47%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼68% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 90, n=5)
65.8 fps ∼75% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=707)
22.6 fps ∼26% -62%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
80 fps ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼86% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼86% +8%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼88% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -30%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (65 - 85, n=5)
77.4 fps ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=562)
21.6 fps ∼22% -73%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼75%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼58% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
77 fps ∼100% +33%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼78% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼95% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼78% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 61, n=5)
59 fps ∼77% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=564)
19.6 fps ∼25% -66%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27 fps ∼59%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼39% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
30 fps ∼65% +11%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼67% +15%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +70%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 34, n=5)
29.8 fps ∼65% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=317)
11.3 fps ∼25% -58%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
23 fps ∼79%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼69% -13%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼69% -13%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 23, n=5)
21.8 fps ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=315)
8.06 fps ∼28% -65%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼90%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼48% -46%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼81% -10%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼83% -8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (49 - 52, n=5)
50.8 fps ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=321)
16.9 fps ∼29% -67%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
56 fps ∼75%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼71% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
54 (20min) fps ∼72% -4%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼72% -4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 58, n=5)
53.4 fps ∼71% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=320)
19.4 fps ∼26% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
49 fps ∼78%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼79% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼81% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (38 - 51, n=5)
47.6 fps ∼76% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=487)
14.5 fps ∼23% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
44 fps ∼92%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼54% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
45 fps ∼94% +2%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼94% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +9%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (34 - 45, n=5)
42 fps ∼88% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=491)
12.8 fps ∼27% -71%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
522516 Points ∼87%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
595466 Points ∼99% +14%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
585231 Points ∼98% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼81% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 527820, n=5)
469996 Points ∼78% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=114)
314203 Points ∼52% -40%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (4.07min - 95.16max) fps ∼34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼23%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (11.09min - 63.1max) fps ∼59%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼30%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (9.36min - 74.72max) fps ∼47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼28%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4988 Score ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7156 Score ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼70%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=89)
2609 Score ∼36%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1394 Points ∼80%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼77% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1514 Points ∼87% +9%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1496 Points ∼86% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1439, n=5)
1351 Points ∼77% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=732)
823 Points ∼47% -41%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10789 Points ∼63%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼68% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11567 Points ∼68% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11842 Points ∼70% +10%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -6%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10646 - 10803, n=5)
10744 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=732)
2512 Points ∼15% -77%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3829 Points ∼48%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼80% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7945 Points ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7240 Points ∼91% +89%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼77% +60%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼30% -39%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=5)
4037 Points ∼51% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=732)
1876 Points ∼24% -51%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9421 Points ∼66%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼67% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10002 Points ∼70% +6%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10058 Points ∼71% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% -1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=5)
9209 Points ∼65% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=732)
3475 Points ∼24% -63%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note20
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4826 Points ∼79%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼91% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6072 Points ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5993 Points ∼99% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼89% +12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼92% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=5)
4815 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=732)
1773 Points ∼29% -63%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +130%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
64.958 Points ∼50% +16%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
64.567 Points ∼50% +15%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
63.374 Points ∼49% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
56.102 Points ∼43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 56.8, n=5)
53.8 Points ∼42% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=191)
40.6 Points ∼31% -28%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +217%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
115.43 Points ∼38% +21%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.78 Points ∼38% +21%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼38% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
95.185 Points ∼32%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 96.2, n=5)
92.8 Points ∼31% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=621)
47.2 Points ∼16% -50%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +138%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48% +15%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
71 runs/min ∼46% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
68.6 runs/min ∼45% +7%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chome 80)
67.7 runs/min ∼44% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
64.4 runs/min ∼42%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 64.4, n=4)
60.4 runs/min ∼39% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=173)
42.7 runs/min ∼28% -34%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +79%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +18%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
104 Points ∼57% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
101 Points ∼56% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
101 Points ∼56%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼55% -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 102, n=5)
94.4 Points ∼52% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=259)
69.7 Points ∼39% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +147%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
23678 Points ∼48% +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +18%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼47% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
22834 Points ∼46% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
20022 Points ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 20022, n=5)
19019 Points ∼39% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=789)
7874 Points ∼16% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=815)
9745 ms * ∼100% -325%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2294 - 2511, n=5)
2387 ms * ∼24% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note20 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
2293.6 ms * ∼24%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼21% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro (Chrome 81)
2021.2 ms * ∼21% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼20% +14%
OnePlus 8 Pro (Chrome 80)
1944.7 ms * ∼20% +15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +75%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy Note20Samsung Galaxy Note10Oppo Find X2 ProXiaomi Mi 10 ProOnePlus 8 ProHuawei Mate 30 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-15%
-7%
10%
-6%
-6%
1%
-80%
Random Write 4KB
233.79
191.9
-18%
204.98
-12%
258.54
11%
197.7
-15%
259.21
11%
229 (205 - 269, n=5)
-2%
36 (0.14 - 319, n=886)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
207.64
194.2
-6%
202.63
-2%
264.9
28%
208.3
0%
226.38
9%
225 (187 - 267, n=5)
8%
59.4 (1.59 - 324, n=886)
-71%
Sequential Write 256KB
780.17
590.3
-24%
728.72
-7%
750.44
-4%
730.4
-6%
401.79
-48%
768 (732 - 802, n=5)
-2%
128 (2.99 - 911, n=886)
-84%
Sequential Read 256KB
1682.85
1478.3
-12%
1605.6
-5%
1738.65
3%
1627.3
-3%
1780.5
6%
1704 (1675 - 1782, n=5)
1%
342 (12.1 - 1802, n=886)
-80%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 1.0.0: Ø39.8 (27-41)
; Armajet; 1.15.1: Ø58.9 (44-61)
Max. Belasting
 35.5 °C34.7 °C31.2 °C 
 34.7 °C34.9 °C31.2 °C 
 34.2 °C33 °C29.4 °C 
Maximum: 35.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 33.2 °C
29 °C32.2 °C31.6 °C
28.1 °C31.5 °C32.6 °C
27.7 °C31.5 °C31.3 °C
Maximum: 32.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  24.5 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.537.92527.627.43120.725.3402326.65033.533.36326.823.68020.819.51002227.112518.238.516017.849.720014.750.925015.155.331513.46040012.262.650012.865.963011.568.680011.671.910001276.3125011.476.7160011.377.4200011.977.8250012.476.7315012.574.9400013.177.9500013.574.7630013.174.3800013.976.21000013.177.2125001478.51600013.767.7SPL24.887.9N0.673.4median 13.1median 74.3Delta1.59.736.923.32923.721.927.4222229.935.3222819.330.716.331.31440.316.956.114.954.614.158.61066.71165.711.766.710.969.411.972.31176.410.276.811.477.812.87912.97912.578.41378.513.175.813.475.315.776.113.573.51470.313.763.924.888.80.677.4median 13median 72.31.18.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note20Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.36 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.92 / 1.5 / 1.54 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.49 / 9.99 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note20
4300 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-67%
23%
-78%
7%
-22%
-3%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
1.47
-60%
0.61
34%
2.2
-139%
0.87
5%
0.92
-0%
0.846 (0.65 - 1, n=5)
8%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=890)
3%
Idle Average *
1.5
3.43
-129%
1.19
21%
3.3
-120%
1.75
-17%
2.9
-93%
1.534 (1.06 - 1.91, n=5)
-2%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=889)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
1.54
3.52
-129%
1.23
20%
3.7
-140%
1.83
-19%
2.94
-91%
1.858 (1.49 - 2.3, n=5)
-21%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=890)
-32%
Load Average *
5.49
6.2
-13%
4.18
24%
5.9
-7%
3.85
30%
3.65
34%
5.14 (4.72 - 5.8, n=5)
6%
4.11 (0.8 - 10.8, n=884)
25%
Load Maximum *
9.99
10.63
-6%
8.53
15%
8.3
17%
6.64
34%
6.18
38%
10.7 (9.99 - 11.8, n=5)
-7%
6.09 (1.2 - 14.2, n=884)
39%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
34h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 12.1)
9h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 43min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
5h 26min
Samsung Galaxy Note20
4300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 8 Pro
4510 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Batterijduur
-22%
-10%
11%
-1%
10%
3%
32%
Reader / Idle
2067
1392
-33%
1223
-41%
2133
3%
2103
2%
2174
5%
2618
27%
H.264
1123
803
-28%
993
-12%
973
-13%
1023
-9%
1098
-2%
1346
20%
WiFi v1.3
589
583
-1%
644
9%
654
11%
865
47%
923
57%
823
40%
909
54%
Load
326
246
-25%
338
4%
198
-39%
296
-9%
219
-33%
408
25%

Pro

+ scherm met accurate kleuren
+ krachtige S-pen
+ ruime en snelle USF 3.1-opslag
+ goede camera's
+ degelijke luidsprekers

Contra

- 5G niet standaard maar optioneel
- geen microSD-ondersteuning
- donkerder scherm dan zijn voorganger
- alleen 60-Hz-paneel
- geen aptX HD of Adaptive aptX

Conclusie – Beter dan zijn reputatie

Getest: Samsung Galaxy Note20 (SM-N980F). Testtoestel voorzien door Samsung Germany.
Getest: Samsung Galaxy Note20 (SM-N980F). Testtoestel voorzien door Samsung Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Als je de specificaties bekijkt en de Note20 en Note20 Ultra naast elkaar legt, lijkt het erop dat er nogal wat toegevingen moesten worden gedaan. 5G is bijvoorbeeld niet beschikbaar in het lagere model en het 60 Hz-scherm past niet in zijn klasse. De Koreaanse fabrikant ging zelfs nog verder en ging terug naar een oudere schermtechnologie dan op de voorganger van de Note20. Het is niet verwonderlijk dat de reactie van de typische techliefhebber ergens tussen opgetrokken wenkbrauwen en een milde hartaanval lag. De kers op de Europese taart is het feit dat Samsung zijn langzamere interne SoC's blijft gebruiken voor toestellen die in Europa worden verkocht, ondanks het feit dat de huidige Qualcomm SoC's erin zijn geslaagd de prestatiekloof nog verder te vergroten.

De Samsung Galaxy Note20 mist een aantal features die we hadden verwacht van een huidige high-end smartphone. Desalniettemin blijft het algemene concept erg krachtig en sterk.

Al bij al blijft de Galaxy Note20 een krachtige vlaggenschip-smartphone met een adviesprijs van minder dan 1000 euro en een aanzienlijk lagere straatprijs. Als je op zoek bent naar een krachtige smartphone met S-Pen-ondersteuning en verzekerde updates voor een beperkt budget, dan is de Note20 wellicht het juiste toestel voor jou. Het vlakke scherm en de kleinere camerabobbel maken het werken met de S-Pen zoveel handiger. Als je zelf nog nooit een scherm met meer dan 60 Hz hebt gezien, mis je het waarschijnlijk helemaal niet. Het enige echte nadeel is het minder helderde scherm met het extra voordeel van natuurlijkere kleuren dan op het Ultra-model.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Note20 - 29-09-2020 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing
91%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 90%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
66 / 70 → 94%
Gewicht
89%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
59 / 64 → 92%
Applicatie-performance
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperatuur
93%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 92%
Camera
74%
Gemiddelde
82%
88%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Note20: Niet altijd beter dan de Note10
Daniel Schmidt, 2020-10- 3 (Update: 2020-10- 3)