Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Smartphone - goedkopere versie van de pen phablet

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger, 16-02-2020

Goedkoper schetsen. Om meer gebruikers te winnen voor zijn stylus-geschikte Galaxy Note-serie, heeft Samsung de goedkopere Galaxy Note 10 Lite gelanceerd. Lees verder in ons testrapport of dit een goed idee was.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Galaxy Note Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 9810
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G72 MP18
Geheugen
6144 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.7 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitief touchscherm, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, glimmend: ja, 60 Hz
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5mm combo aansluiting, Card Reader: microSD max. 1 TB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingssensor, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas, barometer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1800/​1900), LTE (1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,14,18,19,20,28,29,30), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.7 x 163.7 x 76.1
Batterij
4500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​1.7, fase detectie AF (dual-pixel), OIS, LED flits, videos @2160p/​60FPS (camera 1); 12.0MP, f/​2.4, fase detectie AF, OIS, telefoto lens (camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, breedhoek lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, snellader, USB-kabel, headset, SIM-tool, 24 Maanden Garantie, LTE-A pro Cat 18 (1200/150 Mbit/s); SAR value: 0.291W/​kg (hoofd), 1.077W/​kg (lichaam); stylus, fanless
Gewicht
199 g, Voeding: 71 g
Prijs
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
82 %
02-2020
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18
199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
86 %
09-2019
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12
168 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.3"2280x1080
89 %
12-2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
09-2019
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g64 GB SSD6.1"1792x828
83 %
12-2019
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
86 %
10-2019
OnePlus 7T
SD 855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +173%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% +44%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼56% +52%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼43% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
390 (min: 294, max: 447) MBit/s ∼39% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
370 (min: 342, max: 372) MBit/s ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
331 (min: 317, max: 341) MBit/s ∼33% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=508)
247 MBit/s ∼24% -33%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +133%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% +53%
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼55% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
440 (min: 245, max: 489) MBit/s ∼46% +6%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼44% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
415 (min: 295, max: 452) MBit/s ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
327 (min: 321, max: 333) MBit/s ∼34% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1544, n=508)
232 MBit/s ∼24% -44%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (315-388)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø415 (295-452)
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – turn
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – overview
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – turn
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – bridge
GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – bridge

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
23.3 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
29 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
37.4 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
21 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite: 29.86 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 43.43 ∆E
ColorChecker
13 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite: 7.97 ∆E min: 1.71 - max: 16.26 ∆E
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – perfect lighting
Test chart – 1 lux
542
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
510
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 560 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 536.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 510 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
140.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.242
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Dynamic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
35%
29%
49%
15%
29%
Brightness middle
510
764
50%
592
16%
679
33%
625
23%
693
36%
Brightness
536
757
41%
605
13%
671
25%
607
13%
703
31%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
96
5%
93
2%
89
-2%
96
5%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.6
2.66
60%
2.5
62%
0.8
88%
4.38
34%
3.42
48%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
17.56
5.65
68%
5.5
69%
2.4
86%
6.83
61%
6.12
65%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.9
3.2
-10%
2.6
10%
1.1
62%
4.1
-41%
3.3
-14%
Gamma
2.242 98%
2.073 106%
2.16 102%
2.24 98%
2.251 98%
2.265 97%
CCT
6989 93%
6326 103%
6173 105%
6610 98%
7251 90%
6799 96%
Contrast
999

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 229.4 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 229.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 229.4 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 50 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17113 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
10 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 5 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3794 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2457 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3222 Points ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
891 Points ∼23% -77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
3794 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3794, n=44)
1380 Points ∼36% -64%
OpenCL Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4140 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4593 Points ∼100% +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4442 Points ∼97% +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1128 Points ∼25% -73%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2707 Points ∼59% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
4140 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=52)
1756 Points ∼38% -58%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2033 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2191 Points ∼63% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3059 Points ∼88% +50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3463 Points ∼100% +70%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1723 Points ∼50% -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2753 Points ∼79% +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
2033 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=64)
1831 Points ∼53% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
679 Points ∼51%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
822 Points ∼61% +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
783 Points ∼58% +15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1343 Points ∼100% +98%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
543 Points ∼40% -20%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
783 Points ∼58% +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
679 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=64)
522 Points ∼39% -23%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8801 Points ∼85% +50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼100% +76%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
7558 Points ∼73% +29%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼84% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5184 - 5851, n=4)
5411 Points ∼52% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=439)
5530 Points ∼54% -5%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
11011 Points ∼79% +68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼100% +112%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
9052 Points ∼65% +38%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼74% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5736 - 6571, n=4)
6022 Points ∼43% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=602)
6028 Points ∼43% -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2758 Points ∼71% -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2768 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼90% +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
3120 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=106)
2685 Points ∼69% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4201 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6342 Points ∼96% +51%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼96% +52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2153 Points ∼32% -49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
4201 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=106)
2828 Points ∼43% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3613 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4921 Points ∼88% +36%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼100% +54%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2265 Points ∼41% -37%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼99% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
3613 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=106)
2561 Points ∼46% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3649 Points ∼65% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼58% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3188 Points ∼57% +2%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼83% +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2546 - 3120, n=4)
2717 Points ∼49% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5728, n=445)
2052 Points ∼37% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
6087 Points ∼75% +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼82% +39%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2425 Points ∼30% -50%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼98% +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3697 - 4806, n=4)
4023 Points ∼50% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9345, n=445)
1893 Points ∼23% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5300 Points ∼77% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼93% +49%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% +41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2561 Points ∼37% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼100% +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3376 - 4291, n=4)
3634 Points ∼53% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 7982, n=446)
1759 Points ∼26% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3746 Points ∼73% +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼66% +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3193 Points ∼62% +1%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼88% +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2561 - 3148, n=4)
2752 Points ∼54% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5718, n=474)
1962 Points ∼38% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5605 Points ∼31% +42%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼45% +101%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +351%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3646 Points ∼20% -8%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64% +189%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3958 - 4904, n=4)
4626 Points ∼26% +17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=474)
2509 Points ∼14% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5048 Points ∼55% +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼77% +90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +146%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3535 Points ∼38% -6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93% +128%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3744 - 4124, n=4)
3994 Points ∼43% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=474)
2116 Points ∼23% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3559 Points ∼72% +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +61%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼49% -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3171 Points ∼65% +4%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼92% +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2469 - 3056, n=4)
2645 Points ∼54% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 4971, n=525)
1952 Points ∼40% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5659 Points ∼79% +28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼91% +46%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼80% +29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2237 Points ∼31% -49%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼100% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3553 - 4422, n=4)
3808 Points ∼53% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=525)
1580 Points ∼22% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5003 Points ∼79% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼96% +50%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼70% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
2394 Points ∼38% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼100% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3244 - 4022, n=4)
3469 Points ∼55% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7012, n=526)
1513 Points ∼24% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3670 Points ∼75% +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3191 Points ∼65% +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼89% +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2496 - 3087, n=4)
2675 Points ∼55% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=566)
1820 Points ∼37% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5732 Points ∼53% +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼71% +37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3498 Points ∼32% -37%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100% +93%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (4569 - 5586, n=4)
4905 Points ∼45% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11488, n=565)
2062 Points ∼19% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5096 Points ∼63% +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼84% +44%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼42% -28%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100% +72%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3895 - 4734, n=4)
4137 Points ∼51% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8866, n=568)
1782 Points ∼22% -62%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
80 fps ∼25%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
50 fps ∼16% -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼47% +90%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +303%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
84 fps ∼26% +5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57% +131%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (80 - 147, n=4)
129 fps ∼40% +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=734)
40.4 fps ∼13% -49%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55 fps ∼92% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (58 - 60, n=4)
59.5 fps ∼99% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=743)
29.1 fps ∼49% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
73 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
69 fps ∼39% -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼61% +45%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
41 fps ∼23% -44%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64% +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (73 - 76, n=4)
74 fps ∼42% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=638)
23.5 fps ∼13% -68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
57 fps ∼95% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼63% -33%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (45 - 57, n=4)
48.5 fps ∼81% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=647)
20.3 fps ∼34% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
47 fps ∼40% +96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼48% +133%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +388%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
30 fps ∼26% +25%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68% +229%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (24 - 47, n=4)
40.5 fps ∼35% +69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=503)
19 fps ∼16% -21%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
45 fps ∼62% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼37% -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼79% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (24 - 46, n=4)
29.8 fps ∼41% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=505)
17.6 fps ∼24% -62%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
29 fps ∼48% +71%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼43% +53%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +253%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼17% -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45% +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
17 fps ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=238)
10.3 fps ∼17% -39%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
18 fps ∼55% +64%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼58% +73%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +200%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
10 fps ∼30% -9%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼55% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
11 fps ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 68, n=236)
7.41 fps ∼22% -33%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼47%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼58% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼67% +43%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +114%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -43%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
28 fps ∼47% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=242)
15.3 fps ∼26% -45%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38 fps ∼44% +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼56% +58%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +181%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼21% -42%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54% +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
31 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 165, n=242)
17.4 fps ∼20% -44%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
29 fps ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
21 fps ∼29% -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼56% +41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +152%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼23% -41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64% +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (28 - 29, n=4)
28.3 fps ∼39% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=428)
12.9 fps ∼18% -56%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
25 fps ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
21 fps ∼35% -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼57% +36%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼25% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (14 - 25, n=4)
17 fps ∼28% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=432)
11.5 fps ∼19% -54%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1300 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1638 Points ∼100% +26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼89% +12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
1237 Points ∼76% -5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼91% +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (1099 - 1300, n=4)
1160 Points ∼71% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=669)
779 Points ∼48% -40%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6444 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9465 Points ∼89% +47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼95% +57%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3878 Points ∼37% -40%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼100% +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (6370 - 6506, n=4)
6423 Points ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=669)
2218 Points ∼21% -66%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2771 Points ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4598 Points ∼75% +66%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼100% +121%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
4281 Points ∼70% +54%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼79% +76%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (2068 - 2771, n=4)
2533 Points ∼41% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=669)
1625 Points ∼27% -41%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5707 Points ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8014 Points ∼86% +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼100% +63%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
6445 Points ∼69% +13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼97% +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (5707 - 6413, n=4)
6123 Points ∼66% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=669)
3155 Points ∼34% -45%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3393 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy Note10
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4889 Points ∼91% +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼100% +59%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
3392 Points ∼63% 0%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼95% +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
  (3110 - 3393, n=4)
3273 Points ∼61% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=669)
1586 Points ∼29% -53%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58288 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
70955 Points ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
49376 Points ∼70% -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
58288 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=54)
47088 Points ∼66% -19%
MEM (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
51005 Points ∼51%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
100390 Points ∼100% +97%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
51664 Points ∼51% +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
51005 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (16319 - 101089, n=54)
51411 Points ∼51% +1%
GPU (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
117851 Points ∼73%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
160733 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
70647 Points ∼44% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
117851 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5938 - 214615, n=54)
91083 Points ∼57% -23%
CPU (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
102716 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
151146 Points ∼100% +47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
94730 Points ∼63% -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
102716 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40620 - 178616, n=54)
96005 Points ∼64% -7%
Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
329860 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼100% +46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144
266417 Points ∼55% -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
329860 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (84645 - 599843, n=54)
285624 Points ∼59% -13%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +312%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼50% +104%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49% +102%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
47.968 Points ∼36% +49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
46.038 Points ∼35% +43%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=134)
37.3 Points ∼28% +16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
32.3 Points ∼24% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
32.259 Points ∼24%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +366%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41% +92%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼39% +83%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
86.917 Points ∼30% +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
79.228 Points ∼27% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (62.9 - 69.6, n=4)
65.8 Points ∼22% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.949 Points ∼21%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=565)
43.7 Points ∼15% -31%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +303%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼47% +90%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44% +77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chome 76)
59.7 runs/min ∼38% +53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
43.3 runs/min ∼28% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=122)
40.9 runs/min ∼26% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)
39 runs/min ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
39 runs/min ∼25% 0%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +156%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼65% +65%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
97 Points ∼53% +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
77 Points ∼42% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
72 Points ∼39%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (63 - 72, n=4)
67.8 Points ∼37% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=196)
67.6 Points ∼37% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +277%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52% +96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +82%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
18908 Points ∼39% +46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
16241 Points ∼33% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (12933 - 15233, n=4)
14397 Points ∼29% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
12933 Points ∼26%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=726)
7151 Points ∼15% -45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=751)
10247 ms * ∼100% -221%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
3188.8 ms * ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)
2769.8 ms * ∼27% +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2060 - 3189, n=4)
2509 ms * ∼24% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)
2478.2 ms * ∼24% +22%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼20% +37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19% +38%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼6% +82%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy Note10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Note10Huawei Mate 30 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10OnePlus 7TAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
95%
71%
-12%
11%
-4%
-45%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
16%
59.3 (25.5 - 72.4, n=21)
-1%
50.2 (1.7 - 87.1, n=473)
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
12%
74.1 (28.2 - 88.2, n=21)
1%
68.4 (8.1 - 96.5, n=473)
-7%
Random Write 4KB
142
191.9
35%
259.21
83%
118.9
-16%
29.9
-79%
90.8 (18.2 - 250, n=45)
-36%
26.4 (0.14 - 272, n=803)
-81%
Random Read 4KB
132
194.2
47%
226.38
72%
106.2
-20%
170.1
29%
138 (96.8 - 161, n=45)
5%
51.6 (1.59 - 228, n=803)
-61%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.8
590.3
209%
401.79
111%
243.6
28%
218.4
14%
213 (182 - 503, n=45)
12%
107 (2.99 - 729, n=803)
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
776.7
1478.3
90%
1780.5
129%
480.5
-38%
1406
81%
759 (427 - 912, n=45)
-2%
297 (12.1 - 1781, n=803)
-62%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.8 (59-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.8 (59-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (26-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (25-31)
Max. Belasting
 38.5 °C35.6 °C33.2 °C 
 39.4 °C35.8 °C33.2 °C 
 38.9 °C35.9 °C32.4 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.9 °C
31.2 °C34.6 °C35 °C
31.4 °C34.4 °C37.5 °C
30.8 °C34.6 °C39.1 °C
Maximum: 39.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 34.3 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  38.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260/Fluke t3000 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.642.32545.343.23137.137.24037.4385040.238.7633734.48028.628.210027.528.512526.927.116024.931.520022.942.125022.549.131521.455.24002361.150021.165.763022.265.78002068.1100019.871.5125018.373.8160017.876.7200017.673.8250016.868.431501770.4400016.770500017.867.5630016.871.4800017.173.71000017.2681250017.453.51600017.448SPL68.530.983.6N22.91.556.7median 18.3median 67.5Delta2.610.939.943.643.849.536.538.836.142.745.144.635.736.426.732.328.529.326.532.824.841.824.646.82452.122.555.62058.320.466.519.866.719.365.223.869.117.871.31871.517.37016.668.615.760.915.765.715.770.915.672.115.769.415.76415.757.715.755.763.268.730.780.917.322.21.549.5median 18median 65.24.38.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteSamsung Galaxy Note10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.6 / 1.9 Watt
Belasting midlight 8.4 / 10.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 9810
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
18%
-2%
12%
4%
19%
16%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.9
-0%
0.87
3%
0.56
38%
0.7
22%
0.9
-0%
0.783 (0.65 - 0.9, n=4)
13%
0.88 (0.2 - 3.4, n=824)
2%
Idle Average *
1.6
1.2
25%
1.75
-9%
2.99
-87%
1.8
-13%
1.4
12%
1.315 (0.81 - 1.9, n=4)
18%
1.742 (0.6 - 6.2, n=823)
-9%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
2
-5%
1.83
4%
3.02
-59%
2.2
-16%
2.9
-53%
1.903 (0.92 - 3.7, n=4)
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=824)
-7%
Load Average *
8.4
7.7
8%
3.85
54%
4.17
50%
5.2
38%
4.7
44%
5.76 (4.58 - 8.4, n=4)
31%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=818)
51%
Load Maximum *
10.3
10.5
-2%
6.64
36%
5.44
47%
7.5
27%
8.3
19%
7.06 (5.16 - 10.3, n=4)
31%
5.99 (1.2 - 14.2, n=818)
42%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
36h 45min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 51min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 34min
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
5260 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Batterijduur
-27%
-7%
6%
24%
-4%
Reader / Idle
2205
1392
-37%
2174
-1%
2765
25%
2134
-3%
2003
-9%
H.264
1071
803
-25%
1098
3%
1147
7%
1423
33%
967
-10%
WiFi v1.3
904
583
-36%
823
-9%
866
-4%
1127
25%
896
-1%
Load
274
246
-10%
219
-20%
267
-3%
387
41%
283
3%

Pro

+ wonderbaarlijke pen
+ lange batterijduur
+ goede camera opstelling
+ nauwkeurige GPS
+ lage warmteontwikkeling

Contra

- thottling bij langdurige belasting
- matige kwaliteit plastic achterzijde
- geen IP-certificering

Verdict - Cheap Entry With Trade-offs

In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite
In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite is de goedkopere versie van Samsung’s vlaggenschip smartphones. Dit blijkt al snel uit het simpele hoesje, middenklasse SoC, basis mono luidspreker, het beeldscherm met een vrij lage helderheid en de lagere hoeveelheid ondersteunde LTE frequenties.

Echter hoeft de Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite niet gezien te worden als een afgeslankte versie. Afhankelijk van de gebruiker zijn voorkeuren, heeft de Note 10 Lite zelfs een paar voordelen, bijvoorbeeld de langere batterijduur. Diegene die liever analoog audio willen hebben toegang tot een 3.5 mm audio poort en gebruikers kunnen de opslagruimte uitbreiden met een microSD kaart. De Galaxy Note10 heeft geen van deze beide opties.

De Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite is een relatief goedkoop instapmodel voor de Galaxy Note toestellen en wij kunnen deze smartphone dan ook aanraden.

Verder is de kwaliteit van de camera’s goed. De GPS is accuraat, de software is modern en de uitstekende stylus is bijna uniek doordat hiermee een reeks aan nieuwe mogelijkheden ontsloten wordt waarbij slechts een paar features ten opzicht van de andere Note10 smartphones ontbreken.

We bevelen de Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite aan aan diegene die altijd al een goedkopere Galaxy Note smartphone wilden. Echter is het misschien ook handig om naar de Galaxy Note 9 te kijken. Omdat deze een paar maanden ouder is, kan deze voor een vergelijkbare prijs als de Note 10 Lite gekocht worden.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - 14-02-2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Behuizing
76%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
96%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
51 / 70 → 72%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
82%
Gaming-performance
42 / 64 → 66%
Applicatie-performance
63 / 86 → 74%
Temperatuur
90%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
73%
Gemiddelde
76%
82%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Smartphone - goedkopere versie van de pen phablet
Florian Schmitt, 2020-02-16 (Update: 2020-02-17)