Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport OnePlus 7T smartphone: een fors pakket verbeteringen

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, 14-10-2019

De Pro wordt normaal. De OnePlus 7T is een krachtige update van zijn voorganger en komt met vele features die voorheen gereserveerd waren voor het "Pro"-model. Dit klinkt als iets goeds voor alle klanten, maar je leest in het testrapport of deze betaalbare high-end smartphone het geld echt waard is.

OnePlus 7T (7 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 640
Geheugen
8192 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.55 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 402 PPI, capacitief touchscherm, AMOLED, druppel notch, 90 Hz, glimmend: ja, HDR
Opslag
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 101 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, Audio Verbindingen: audio uitgang via USB-C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: accelerometer, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.13 x 160.94 x 74.44
Batterij
3800 mAh Lithium-Polymer, WarpCharge 30T snelladen (30 watt)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.6, contrast detectie AF, fase detectie AF, OIS, dual LED flits, videos @2160p/​60fps (camera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, breedhoeklens (camera 2); 12.0MP, f/​2.2, telefoto lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: stereo luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, snellader, USB-C-kabel, siliconen hoes, SIM-tool, OnePlus Community, OnePlus Switch, Game Space, 24 Maanden Garantie, LTE Cat 18/​13 (1200Mbps/​150Mbps); A-GPS (L1/​L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/​E5a); SAR: 1.06 W/kg (hoofd), 0.93 W/kg (lichaam), fanless
Gewicht
190 g, Voeding: 128 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

EvaluatieratingversionDatumModelGewichtHoogteFormaatResolutieBest Price
86%710-2019OnePlus 7T
855+, Adreno 640
190 g8.13 mm6.55"2400x1080
85%706-2019OnePlus 7
855, Adreno 640
182 g8.2 mm6.41"2340x1080
86%705-2019OnePlus 7 Pro
855, Adreno 640
206 g8.8 mm6.67"3120x1440
89%608-2019Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
855, Adreno 640
191 g8.8 mm6.39"2340x1080
87%709-2019Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
194 g8.3 mm6.1"1792x828
85%703-2019Samsung Galaxy S10e
9820, Mali-G76 MP12
150 g7.9 mm5.8"2280x1080
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T

Size comparison

162.6 mm 75.9 mm 8.8 mm 206 g160.94 mm 74.44 mm 8.13 mm 190 g157.7 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 182 g156.7 mm 74.3 mm 8.8 mm 191 g150.9 mm 75.7 mm 8.3 mm 194 g142.2 mm 69.9 mm 7.9 mm 150 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
563 (min: 490, max: 597) MBit/s ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
520 (min: 445, max: 571) MBit/s ∼92% +21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼83% +9%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼76%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
388 (min: 361, max: 421) MBit/s ∼69% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼68% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼40% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
529 (min: 204, max: 603) MBit/s ∼100% +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼89% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
468 (min: 351, max: 489) MBit/s ∼88% +11%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼74% -8%
OnePlus 7
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
330 (min: 232, max: 365) MBit/s ∼62% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼41% -49%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø430 (374-485)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø422 (238-447)
GPS OnePlus 7T – Overview
GPS OnePlus 7T – Overview
GPS OnePlus 7T – Turning point
GPS OnePlus 7T – Turning point
GPS OnePlus 7T – Bridge
GPS OnePlus 7T – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turning point
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Turning point
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – Bridge

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Standard lens photo
Standard lens photo
Standard lens photo
Standard lens photo
Telephoto lens photo
Standard lens photo
Wide-angle lens photo
Night mode photo
ColorChecker Photo
5.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T: 6.84 ∆E min: 2.08 - max: 14.39 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
15.6 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
12 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T: 10.22 ∆E min: 3.21 - max: 19.38 ∆E
Test chart under perfect lighting
Test chart under perfect lighting
Test chart at 1 lux
723
cd/m²
698
cd/m²
701
cd/m²
704
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
699
cd/m²
696
cd/m²
711
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 723 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 703.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.26 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 96 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 693 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.42 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
OnePlus 7
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Apple iPhone 11
IPS, 1792x828, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S10e
AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8
Screen
-7%
23%
12%
33%
8%
Brightness middle
693
603
-13%
586
-15%
594
-14%
679
-2%
426
-39%
Brightness
703
605
-14%
584
-17%
607
-14%
671
-5%
427
-39%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
97
1%
91
-5%
93
-3%
96
0%
Black Level *
0.68
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.42
3.5
-2%
1.39
59%
1.51
56%
0.8
77%
2.14
37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.12
7.7
-26%
2.7
56%
4.27
30%
2.4
61%
3.29
46%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.7
18%
1.6
52%
2.6
21%
1.1
67%
1.8
45%
Gamma
2.265 97%
2.266 97%
2.243 98%
2.219 99%
2.24 98%
2.111 104%
CCT
6799 96%
6775 96%
6672 97%
6390 102%
6610 98%
6329 103%
Contrast
999

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 357 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 357 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 357 Hz is relatief hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Er zijn echter rapporten die beweren dat sommige mensen toch flickering met 500 Hz en hoger kunnen waarnemen: opgelet dus.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9266 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5
OpenCL Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2707 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2652 - 2716, n=3)
2692 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=28)
2014 Points ∼74% -26%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2753 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3463 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2753 - 2940, n=3)
2878 Points ∼83% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=38)
2018 Points ∼58% -27%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
783 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1343 Points ∼100% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (783 - 792, n=3)
789 Points ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=38)
592 Points ∼44% -24%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8317 Points ∼82%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7372 Points ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7470 Points ∼73% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10170 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
8317 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=325)
4691 Points ∼46% -44%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11388 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10812 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10976 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10553 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
11388 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=384)
4726 Points ∼41% -59%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3705 Points ∼82%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3510 Points ∼78% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3472 Points ∼77% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3429 Points ∼76% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4506 Points ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
3705 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=384)
1426 Points ∼32% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9205 Points ∼92% +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼100% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼93% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7966 Points ∼80% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8702 - 10700, n=3)
9948 Points ∼100% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=387)
5331 Points ∼53% -39%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼85%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
12095 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼97% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼92% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
10008 Points ∼83% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10286 - 12907, n=3)
11946 Points ∼99% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=555)
5782 Points ∼48% -44%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3324 Points ∼94% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼94% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼75% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (3489 - 3564, n=2)
3527 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=67)
2678 Points ∼76% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5862 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼86% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6527 - 6640, n=2)
6584 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=67)
2745 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5012 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (5509 - 5530, n=2)
5520 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=67)
2496 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4416 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼95% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼70% -29%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3219 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3106 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4635 - 4683, n=3)
4667 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=395)
1979 Points ∼42% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7089 Points ∼87% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼88% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼83% -16%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
8119 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5368 Points ∼66% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7977 - 8006, n=3)
7996 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=395)
1788 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6249 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6067 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4620 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6875 - 6916, n=3)
6902 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=396)
1659 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼99%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4405 Points ∼96% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼95% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼72% -27%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3411 Points ∼75% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3077 Points ∼67% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4517 - 4604, n=3)
4575 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=423)
1891 Points ∼41% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10302 Points ∼58% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼58% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼38% -41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
17853 Points ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4886 Points ∼27% -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (11433 - 11448, n=3)
11443 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=423)
2388 Points ∼13% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼93%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7940 Points ∼86% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼86% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼59% -36%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
9199 Points ∼100% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4321 Points ∼47% -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8531 - 8605, n=3)
8580 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=423)
2004 Points ∼22% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4093 Points ∼91% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼83% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2429 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
3005 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4492 - 4519, n=3)
4510 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=475)
1887 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6336 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼88% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5726 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
5206 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7044 - 7150, n=3)
7079 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=475)
1479 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5648 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4400 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4477 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6266 - 6319, n=3)
6284 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=476)
1423 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4068 Points ∼91% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼84% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
2906 Points ∼65% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4377 - 4503, n=3)
4461 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=515)
1752 Points ∼39% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
10008 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4507 Points ∼42% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10637 - 10781, n=3)
10685 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=514)
1937 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7556 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4015 Points ∼49% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8136 - 8165, n=3)
8155 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=517)
1673 Points ∼21% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼81% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33864 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
32155 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (30561 - 33697, n=3)
31606 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=675)
14216 Points ∼42% -58%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points ∼56%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼51% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼50% -11%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
209204 Points ∼100% +78%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
72022 Points ∼34% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (117304 - 118129, n=3)
117854 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=673)
22187 Points ∼11% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points ∼78%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼66% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼66% -15%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
97276 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
56465 Points ∼58% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (72173 - 75613, n=3)
73320 Points ∼75% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=673)
17924 Points ∼18% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼57%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼52% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼52% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼52% -10%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
322 fps ∼100% +74%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
141 fps ∼44% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (185 - 185, n=2)
185 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼12% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼86%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼87% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
60 fps ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (59 - 60, n=2)
59.5 fps ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼41% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
100 fps ∼57% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼58% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼51% -20%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
175 fps ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
85 fps ∼49% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (111 - 112, n=2)
112 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼13% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼92% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (57 - 59, n=2)
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼32% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
67 fps ∼57% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼61% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼53% -22%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
117 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼45% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (79 - 79, n=2)
79 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼15% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼97%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼85% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
53 fps ∼88% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (40 - 58, n=2)
49 fps ∼82% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼28% -71%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼45%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼43% -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼25% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼28% -37%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +122%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
28 fps ∼47% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (17 - 27, n=3)
20.3 fps ∼34% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=188)
10 fps ∼17% -63%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼55%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼52% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼48% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼73% +33%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33 fps ∼100% +83%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼48% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.7 fps ∼57% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=187)
7 fps ∼21% -61%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
38 fps ∼63% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼38% -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼60% -12%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
16 fps ∼27% -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (25 - 41, n=3)
30.7 fps ∼51% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=192)
14.7 fps ∼25% -64%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼54%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
43 fps ∼49% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼48% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼48% -11%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
87 fps ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
41 fps ∼47% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (47 - 47, n=3)
47 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=192)
16.5 fps ∼19% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼64%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼58% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼58% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼49% -23%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
73 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
43 fps ∼59% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (47 - 48, n=2)
47.5 fps ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼17% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼35% -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼68% 0%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
40 fps ∼67% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (24 - 41, n=2)
32.5 fps ∼54% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼18% -73%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
395265 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
370908 Points ∼81% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
369294 Points ∼81% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
372734 Points ∼82% -6%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
456891 Points ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
329444 Points ∼72% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
395265 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=296)
143587 Points ∼31% -64%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1407 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
1439 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (1236 - 1485, n=2)
1361 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 9387, n=635)
773 Points ∼52% -48%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9477 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
8484 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10611 - 10618, n=2)
10615 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼20% -80%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼87%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5610 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼93% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼70% -19%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4474 Points ∼80% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4869 - 5091, n=2)
4980 Points ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼27% -69%
System (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8986 Points ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼81% -17%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
7831 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8988 - 9294, n=2)
9141 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼33% -67%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5089 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 11
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144
4548 Points ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4992 - 5124, n=2)
5058 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼29% -71%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
132.886 Points ∼100% +104%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 65.3, n=2)
63.9 Points ∼48% -2%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
63.057 Points ∼47% -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼47% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼44% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=106)
35.7 Points ∼27% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
293.36 Points ∼100% +143%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (115 - 121, n=2)
118 Points ∼40% -2%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
117.76 Points ∼40% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼33% -20%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=531)
41.9 Points ∼14% -65%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
157 runs/min ∼100% +127%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼44%
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)
67.9 runs/min ∼43% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (66.4 - 69.1, n=2)
67.8 runs/min ∼43% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼39% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
42.5 runs/min ∼27% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=94)
40 runs/min ∼25% -42%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
184 Points ∼100% +84%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼60% +11%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
110 Points ∼60% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼58% +7%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (93 - 100, n=2)
96.5 Points ∼52% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=165)
67 Points ∼36% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
48819 Points ∼100% +93%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼52%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
25051 Points ∼51% -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼51% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23999 - 25353, n=2)
24676 Points ∼51% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼42% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
18697 Points ∼38% -26%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=693)
6801 Points ∼14% -73%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=717)
10531 ms * ∼100% -421%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼22% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)
2239.5 ms * ∼21% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2021 - 2134, n=2)
2077 ms * ∼20% -3%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼19%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼19% +3%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)
1958 ms * ∼19% +3%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)
572.8 ms * ∼5% +72%

* ... kleiner is beter

OnePlus 7TOnePlus 7OnePlus 7 ProXiaomi Mi 9T ProApple iPhone 11Samsung Galaxy S10eAverage 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
21%
17%
82%
-24%
77%
-58%
Random Write 4KB
29.9
28.7
-4%
24.8
-17%
148.51
397%
24.1
-19%
100 (29.9 - 170, n=2)
234%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=751)
-25%
Random Read 4KB
170.1
175.3
3%
174.1
2%
142.5
-16%
136.9
-20%
181 (170 - 192, n=2)
6%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=751)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
218.4
392
79%
387
77%
196.87
-10%
194.1
-11%
370 (218 - 522, n=2)
69%
97.4 (2.99 - 590, n=751)
-55%
Sequential Read 256KB
1406
1463
4%
1468
4%
808.76
-42%
792.2
-44%
1411 (1406 - 1416, n=2)
0%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=751)
-80%
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.6 (59-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.6 (48-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.7.3a: Ø29.7 (27-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.7.3a: Ø30 (29-31)
Max. Belasting
 48.2 °C45.7 °C41.1 °C 
 46.9 °C45.3 °C41.7 °C 
 46.7 °C45.2 °C41.1 °C 
Maximum: 48.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 44.7 °C
37.4 °C41.7 °C44.2 °C
38.4 °C42.2 °C44.1 °C
38.8 °C42.6 °C44.2 °C
Maximum: 44.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 41.5 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  41.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.843.92542.542.53134.235.24034.239.25039.240.5632932.18025.826.210024.227.912524.434.416022.64520021.452.525021.458.431519.958.140019.159.550019.462.363018.663.980017.866.8100019.169.9125017.874.7160019.274.920001877.1250017.476.6315016.975.2400016.975500016.967.7630016.962.8800017.268.71000017.270.11250017.266.11600017.359.4SPL71.772.930.185.2N26.627.71.359.2median 18median 66.1Delta1.86.940.242.244.145.434.135.238.141.338.939.5303425.928.825.329.123.236.120.546.220.451.92056.918.658.617.356.217.255.820.263.119.667.616.173.913.978.515.280.815.574.414.56614.266.714.169.515.969.815.368.814.96714.662.514.960.714.757.174.265.528.362.985.62818.11.115.556.2median 15.9median 63.12.46.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 7TOnePlus 7
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 7T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.4 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.4 / 2.9 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.7 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
21%
-9%
15%
-7%
12%
-38%
10%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.6
33%
0.9
-0%
0.7
22%
0.56
38%
0.6
33%
1.7 (0.9 - 2.1, n=3)
-89%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=781)
2%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.1
21%
1.8
-29%
1
29%
2.99
-114%
1.2
14%
2.47 (1.4 - 3, n=3)
-76%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=780)
-24%
Idle Maximum *
2.9
2
31%
2.9
-0%
1.3
55%
3.02
-4%
1.5
48%
3.3 (2.9 - 3.5, n=3)
-14%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=781)
30%
Load Average *
4.7
4
15%
5.5
-17%
5.2
-11%
4.17
11%
5.2
-11%
5.1 (4.7 - 5.3, n=3)
-9%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=775)
13%
Load Maximum *
8.3
8
4%
8.2
1%
10
-20%
5.44
34%
10.2
-23%
8.3 (8.3 - 8.3, n=3)
-0%
5.92 (1.2 - 14.2, n=775)
29%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
33h 23min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 07min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 43min
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
OnePlus 7
3700 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11
3110 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10e
3100 mAh
Batterijduur
-2%
-15%
-9%
12%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2003
1989
-1%
1745
-13%
1768
-12%
2765
38%
1185
-41%
H.264
967
933
-4%
802
-17%
987
2%
1147
19%
795
-18%
WiFi v1.3
896
901
1%
768
-14%
762
-15%
866
-3%
416
-54%
Load
283
278
-2%
236
-17%
249
-12%
267
-6%
164
-42%

Pro

+ 90-Hz beeldscherm
+ fantastische triple-camera opstelling
+ fraaie en stevige behuizing
+ goede stereo luidsprekers
+ lange batterijduur
+ nauwkeurige GPS
+ meerdere LTE frequenties

Contra

- forse warmteontwikkeling bij belasting
- geen microSD
- niet stof- en waterbestendig
- 90 Hz modus in veel games standaard niet aan

Verdict – Great technology with minor shortcomings

In review: OnePlus 7T. Review device provided by OnePlus Germany.
In review: OnePlus 7T. Review device provided by OnePlus Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

OnePlus heeft de OnePlus 7T een grote update gegeven met vele features die voorheen voorbehouden waren aan het Pro-model. Voor kopers is dit goed omdat ze meer krijgen voor minder geld: er is de nog snellere oplaadtechnologie WarpCharge 30T, de betere camera, fraaie behuizing en natuurlijk, het belangrijkste, het voortreffelijke 90 Hz beeldscherm, dat bij alledaags gebruik een zegen is. Helaas gebruikt OnePlus nog geen 90 Hz in games.

Aan de ene kant wil je OnePlus feliciteren omdat zij het aandurft features zoals draadloos opladen achterwege te laden: volgens een interview met de oprichter voldoet deze technologie nog niet wat betreft snelheid en betrouwbaarheid. Aan de andere kant is het voor sommige gebruikers ergerlijk dat behalve draadloos opladen, ook een IP-certificering en uitbreidbare opslag middels microSD ontbreken.

Er zijn nog verschillen met het Pro-model wat betreft het beeldscherm; de OnePlus 7T bevind zich onderin de hoogste klasse, en het Pro-model van vorig jaar doet het nog aanzienlijk beter wat betreft resolutie en kleurechtheid.

De OnePlus 7T is een erg goed toestel in de topklasse. Als draadloos opladen en waterbestendigheid je niet zoveel kunnen schelen, dan kun je gerust deze smartphone kopen.

Al met al krijg je veel waar voor je geld met de OnePlus 7T. Met zijn extreem snelle laadproces en het 90 Hz beeldscherm bewijst de OnePlus 7T een plezante metgezel te zijn.

OnePlus 7T - 07-10-2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Behuizing
87%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
97%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
44 / 70 → 63%
Gewicht
89%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
59 / 64 → 92%
Applicatie-performance
76 / 86 → 88%
Temperatuur
84%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 81%
Camera
70%
Gemiddelde
79%
86%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport OnePlus 7T smartphone: een fors pakket verbeteringen
Florian Schmitt, 2019-10-14 (Update: 2019-10-14)