Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Huawei Mate 30 Pro Smartphone: Een sterke smartphone, zelfs zonder Google

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Andrea Grüblinger, 18-12-2019

Spot on! Film off! Met de Mate 30 Pro richt Huawei zich voor het eerst op videografie en heeft het zijn high-end smartphone niet alleen de nieuwste Kirin SoC gegeven, maar ook een tweede 40 MP-sensor voor ultragroothoekfoto's en video-opnames. Bovendien heeft het Chinese bedrijf veel geavanceerde technologie in deze smartphone gestopt, of op zijn minst waar het bedrijf toegang tot heeft.

Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Mate 30 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 990
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-G76 MP16
Geheugen
8192 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.53 inch 18.37:9, 2400 x 1176 pixel 409 PPI, capacitief, 10-punts multitouch, knokkelgebaren, native pen support, OLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glimmend: ja, HDR
Opslag
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, , 237.75 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C, Card Reader: tot 256 GB nano geheugenkaart, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, barometer, kompas, gyroscoop, hall sensor, nabijheidssensor, USB Type-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800 and 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19. LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 , 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.8 x 158.1 x 73.1
Batterij
17.33 Wh, 4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.85 Volt
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix (Wide angle, f/1.6, 27 mm, 1/1.7") + 8 MPix (3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 80 mm, 1/4") + 40 MPix (SuperSensing video camera, f/1.8, 18 mm, 1/1.54") + 3D ToF, 7,680 FPS slow-motion; Camera2 API level: Limited
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 3D ToF)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Two, Toetsenbord: digitaal, stroomadapter, USB kabel, SIM tool, koptelefoon, documentatie, EMUI 10.0, 24 Maanden Garantie, Dual-band GNSS: Beidou, Galileo, Glonass, GPS, fanless, waterproof
Gewicht
198 g, Voeding: 125 g
Prijs
1099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device Comparison

EvaluatieDatumModelGewichtDriveFormaatResolutieBest Price
89%12-2019Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87%10-2018Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.3"3120x1440
87%09-2019Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
87%09-2019Samsung Galaxy Note10+
9825, Mali-G76 MP12
196 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.8"3040x1440
84%10-2019LG G8X ThinQ
855, Adreno 640
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2340x1080
87%11-2019OnePlus 7T Pro
855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -47%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1001 (min: 209, max: 1106) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
651 (min: 539, max: 678) MBit/s ∼64% -36%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼57% -43%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
349 (min: 310, max: 384) MBit/s ∼35% -65%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1014, n=479)
235 MBit/s ∼23% -77%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (min: 6, max: 792) MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Mali-G76 MP12, 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
558 (min: 496, max: 582) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
LG G8X ThinQ
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
343 (min: 290, max: 411) MBit/s ∼36% -64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 966, n=479)
222 MBit/s ∼23% -77%
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Nighthawk AX 12 (iperf 3.1.3): Ø1009 (912-1092)
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø533 (468-602)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Nighthawk AX 12 (iperf 3.1.3): Ø966 (923-995)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø637 (584-715)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overzicht
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Rondom een meer
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Rondom een meer
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lus
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Lus
GPS test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Overzicht
GPS test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Overzicht
GPS test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Rondom een meer
GPS test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Rondom een meer
GPS test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Lus
GPS test: Huawei Mate 30 Pro - Lus
Mate 30 Pro @ 60 FPS
Mate 30 Pro @ 60 FPS
Mate 30 Pro @ 30 FPS
Mate 30 Pro @ 30 FPS
Galaxy S10+ @ 30 FPS
Galaxy S10+ @ 60 FPS
iPhone 11 Pro @ 30 FPS
iPhone 11 Pro @ 60 FPS
Xiaomi Mi 9 @ 30 FPS
Xiaomi Mi 9 @ 60 FPS
P30 Pro @ 30 FPS

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker Photo
5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate 30 Pro: 6.66 ∆E min: 1.92 - max: 10.85 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
24 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
18 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Huawei Mate 30 Pro: 11.22 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 24.04 ∆E
Testkaart @ 2,500 lux (40 MP)
Testkaart @ 2,500 lux (Zoomed-in section)
Testkaart @ 1 lux
603
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
616
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
592
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
612
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 616 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 605.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 96 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 592 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
98.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8
LG G8X ThinQ
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Screen
18%
29%
7%
-60%
-3%
Brightness middle
592
576
-3%
790
33%
683
15%
570
-4%
606
2%
Brightness
605
582
-4%
790
31%
694
15%
581
-4%
611
1%
Brightness Distribution
96
90
-6%
97
1%
96
0%
90
-6%
95
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.3
48%
1.4
44%
2.9
-16%
6.27
-151%
3.46
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.5
3.5
36%
3.4
38%
4.8
13%
9.75
-77%
5.64
-3%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.6
38%
1.9
27%
2.2
15%
5.7
-119%
2
23%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.18 101%
2.23 99%
2.11 104%
2.37 93%
2.258 97%
CCT
6173 105%
6561 99%
6466 101%
6247 104%
7309 89%
6779 96%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 245.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 245.1 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 13560 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
3.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 1.6 ms stijging
↘ 1.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
3.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 1.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5
Metal Score (sorteer op waarde)
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6448 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3294 - 6448, n=5)
5360 Points ∼83%
Vulkan Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3222 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2245 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2837 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2430 Points ∼75% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
3222 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (143 - 3222, n=41)
1345 Points ∼42% -58%
OpenCL Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4442 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3460 Points ∼76% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4567 Points ∼100% +3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2305 Points ∼50% -48%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2716 Points ∼59% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
4442 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=47)
1789 Points ∼39% -60%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3059 Points ∼94%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
2347 Points ∼72% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3242 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2177 Points ∼67% -29%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2571 Points ∼79% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2940 Points ∼91% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
3059 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=59)
1883 Points ∼58% -38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
783 Points ∼58%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
685 Points ∼51% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1344 Points ∼100% +72%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
805 Points ∼60% +3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
746 Points ∼56% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
792 Points ∼59% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
783 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 1344, n=59)
537 Points ∼40% -31%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8938 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11300 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=330)
4670 Points ∼41%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
10024 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
10367 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=389)
4721 Points ∼46%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
3378 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4549 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=389)
1425 Points ∼31%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
9225 Points ∼88% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9027 Points ∼86% -13%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9259 Points ∼89% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼100% +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
10322 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11690, n=414)
5417 Points ∼52% -48%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
12535 Points ∼90% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
11813 Points ∼85% -15%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
11795 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼91% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
13947 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 15193, n=578)
5888 Points ∼42% -58%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
2571 Points ∼66% -34%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3128 Points ∼81% -19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
3870 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=87)
2660 Points ∼69% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6186 Points ∼95% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5733 Points ∼88% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼100% +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6369 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=87)
2655 Points ∼41% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4713 Points ∼85% -15%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4838 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼99% -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
5570 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=87)
2439 Points ∼44% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4364 Points ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3389 Points ∼61% -39%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3866 Points ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% -16%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
5576 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5576, n=421)
2010 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4250 Points ∼53% -36%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
6036 Points ∼75% -9%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6857 Points ∼86% +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼100% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6657 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=421)
1808 Points ∼23% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼92%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4275 Points ∼62% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5143 Points ∼74% -19%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5851 Points ∼85% -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼100% +8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6382 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=422)
1684 Points ∼24% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4407 Points ∼86% -14%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3498 Points ∼68% -32%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3308 Points ∼64% -36%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼90% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
5133 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5133, n=450)
1920 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼70%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5854 Points ∼51% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5083 Points ∼44% -36%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9724 Points ∼85% +22%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼100% +44%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
7970 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=450)
2418 Points ∼21% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼82%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5456 Points ∼63% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4618 Points ∼54% -35%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6795 Points ∼79% -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼100% +21%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
7098 Points ∼82% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=450)
2039 Points ∼24% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4183 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3353 Points ∼68% -32%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4429 Points ∼90% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
4909 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4909, n=501)
1916 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼92%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4206 Points ∼60% -35%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼86% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5712 Points ∼81% -12%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6275 Points ∼89% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼100% +9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6478 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=501)
1503 Points ∼21% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼97%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4201 Points ∼67% -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼87% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4940 Points ∼79% -18%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5743 Points ∼92% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼100% +4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6048 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=502)
1450 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4150 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
3273 Points ∼67% -33%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3260 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼92% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
4900 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4900, n=542)
1782 Points ∼36% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5305 Points ∼47% -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
5043 Points ∼45% -34%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9806 Points ∼87% +28%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼94% +39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
7671 Points ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=541)
1979 Points ∼18% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4996 Points ∼61% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼97% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4502 Points ∼55% -34%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6780 Points ∼83% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100% +20%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6815 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8338, n=544)
1713 Points ∼21% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
36755 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33268 Points ∼77% -23%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
31384 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
43459 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=701)
14394 Points ∼33% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
67730 Points ∼33% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +175%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
66142 Points ∼32% -12%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
103509 Points ∼50% +38%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57% +57%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
75073 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=699)
22589 Points ∼11% -70%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
57047 Points ∼59% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
54233 Points ∼56% -16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
68517 Points ∼71% +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75% +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
64626 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=699)
18255 Points ∼19% -72%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
120 fps ∼42% -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +89%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
95 fps ∼33% -37%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
151 fps ∼53% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% +22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
152 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=714)
38.7 fps ∼13% -75%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼98%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
61 fps ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
58 fps ∼95% -3%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼98% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
60 fps ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=723)
28.5 fps ∼47% -52%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
73 fps ∼46% -31%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +48%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
89 fps ∼57% -16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
85 fps ∼54% -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
106 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=619)
22.4 fps ∼14% -79%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
42 fps ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
56 fps ∼93% -7%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=628)
19.7 fps ∼33% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29 fps ∼29% -48%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +79%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
65 fps ∼65% +16%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
51 fps ∼51% -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% +41%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
56 fps ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=484)
18.2 fps ∼18% -67%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
26 fps ∼36% -64%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
36 fps ∼49% -51%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
73 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=486)
17 fps ∼23% -77%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
19 fps ∼41% -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
17 fps ∼37% -35%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25 fps ∼54% -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
26 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=212)
9.95 fps ∼22% -62%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
13 fps ∼45% -32%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼62% -5%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼55% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=211)
6.88 fps ∼24% -64%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
18 fps ∼31% -55%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27 fps ∼47% -32%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼66% -5%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
40 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=216)
14.7 fps ∼25% -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
33 fps ∼44% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +53%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
48 fps ∼64% -2%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼56% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
49 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=216)
16.4 fps ∼22% -67%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
31 fps ∼49% -24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +54%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
28 fps ∼44% -32%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
36 fps ∼57% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76% +17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
41 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=409)
12.4 fps ∼20% -70%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16 fps ∼33% -53%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
18 fps ∼38% -47%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼69% -3%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
34 fps ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=413)
11.1 fps ∼23% -67%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (min: 4.07, max: 95.16) fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
29.12 (min: 9.74, max: 74.17) fps ∼1% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
33.38 (min: 8.52, max: 83.34) fps ∼1% +14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4528 fps ∼100% +15396%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
29.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=67)
84.4 fps ∼2% +189%
Vulkan Medium Native (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (min: 11.09, max: 63.1) fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
16.92 (min: 6.06, max: 28.78) fps ∼1% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
27.47 (min: 12.07, max: 47.94) fps ∼1% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2850 fps ∼100% +9058%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
31.1 fps ∼1% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=60)
62 fps ∼2% +99%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (min: 9.36, max: 74.72) fps ∼1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
25.57 (min: 7.38, max: 46.96) fps ∼1% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
39.13 (min: 10.62, max: 99.35) fps ∼1% +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4462 fps ∼100% +13062%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
33.9 fps ∼1% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=57)
95.9 fps ∼2% +183%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
300617 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
462516 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
347229 Points ∼75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=297)
143610 Points ∼31%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
250848 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
291772 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5600 - 293444, n=490)
87858 Points ∼30%
VRMark - Amber Room (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼99%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
5025 Score ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4985 Score ∼99% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼99% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
4997 Score ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=64)
2267 Score ∼45% -55%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
1424 Points ∼82% -3%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
1374 Points ∼79% -6%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1256 Points ∼72% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71% -15%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
1462 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=650)
767 Points ∼44% -48%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6273 Points ∼37% -38%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
9092 Points ∼53% -10%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9339 Points ∼55% -8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62% +5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
10112 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=650)
2126 Points ∼13% -79%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼98%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
6283 Points ∼100% +2%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼37% -62%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4646 Points ∼74% -24%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5140 Points ∼82% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼81% -17%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
6130 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=650)
1571 Points ∼25% -74%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
8604 Points ∼61% -8%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
7965 Points ∼56% -14%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9113 Points ∼64% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
9309 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=650)
3061 Points ∼22% -67%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼96%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144
4687 Points ∼84% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 12288
4637 Points ∼83% -14%
LG G8X ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4841 Points ∼86% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼89% -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
5389 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=650)
1535 Points ∼27% -72%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +96%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
65.9 Points ∼51% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
63.096 Points ∼49% -4%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48% -5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 74)
48.44 Points ∼38% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2)
42.69 Points ∼33% -35%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=118)
36.3 Points ∼28% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +161%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
115 Points ∼38% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼36% -5%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
106.73 Points ∼35% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
84.48 Points ∼28% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=547)
42.7 Points ∼14% -63%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +106%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
74.1 runs/min ∼48% 0%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chome 78)
66.8 runs/min ∼44% -10%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 71)
58.6 runs/min ∼38% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=106)
40 runs/min ∼26% -46%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
runs/min ∼0% -100%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +52%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼69% +4%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
119 Points ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
118 Points ∼65% -1%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% -22%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
90 Points ∼50% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=179)
67.4 Points ∼37% -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +110%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
23568 Points ∼48% 0%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
23506 Points ∼48% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼47% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
19135 Points ∼39% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=708)
6954 Points ∼14% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=733)
10398 ms * ∼100% -430%
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2)
2527.8 ms * ∼24% -29%
LG G8X ThinQ (Chrome 78)
2201.2 ms * ∼21% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼21% -9%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
1963 ms * ∼19% -0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼19% +1%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼5% +71%

* ... kleiner is beter

Huawei Mate 30 ProHuawei Mate 20 ProSamsung Galaxy Note10+LG G8X ThinQOnePlus 7T ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
-7%
-33%
-33%
-15%
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
72.38 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
5%
59.47 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
47.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-31%
64.3 (59.5 - 69.2, n=2)
-7%
49.8 (1.7 - 87.1, n=450)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
83.18 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
1%
71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-14%
68.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-16%
76.7 (71 - 82.5, n=2)
-7%
68.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=450)
-17%
Random Write 4KB
259.21
157.84
-39%
183.59
-29%
30.2
-88%
26
-90%
106 (24.8 - 259, n=7)
-59%
24 (0.14 - 259, n=777)
-91%
Random Read 4KB
226.38
157.42
-30%
196.22
-13%
160.5
-29%
169
-25%
186 (169 - 226, n=7)
-18%
49.4 (1.59 - 226, n=777)
-78%
Sequential Write 256KB
401.79
196.39
-51%
588.06
46%
497.1
24%
405
1%
453 (387 - 590, n=7)
13%
101 (2.99 - 590, n=777)
-75%
Sequential Read 256KB
1780.5
853.28
-52%
1503.7
-16%
704.8
-60%
1489
-16%
1525 (1463 - 1781, n=7)
-14%
283 (12.1 - 1781, n=777)
-84%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; PUBG Mobile (0.15.0): Ø39.9 (30-41)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Asphalt 9 (1.8.1a): Ø29.7 (16-31)
; Dead Trigger 2; Dead Trigger 2 (1.6.3): Ø60 (58-61)
Max. Belasting
 39.8 °C39.4 °C36.6 °C 
 38.2 °C38.2 °C34.7 °C 
 36.8 °C35.9 °C34.3 °C 
Maximum: 39.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.1 °C
31.8 °C35.6 °C41 °C
32.4 °C34.4 °C39.5 °C
31.3 °C34.8 °C37.3 °C
Maximum: 41 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.3 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  27.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.934.82529.224.73121.528.44024.2255034.330.76324.423.4802519.310024.322.812523.529.516023.845.520020.945.325019.446.931518.251.940016.752.850015.85863014.665.880014.468.310001472.8125014.573.4160014.271.2200014.368.8250013.570.5315014.870.340001572.6500014.472.1630014.966800014.554.4100001552.21250014.853.11600015.146.9SPL27.182N0.949.4median 14.9median 58Delta2.511.132.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei Mate 30 ProApple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei Mate 30 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.17 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.87 / 1.75 / 1.83 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.85 / 6.64 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
LG G8X ThinQ
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-13%
-24%
-25%
-11%
-73%
0%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
0.87
0.95
-9%
0.92
-6%
0.7
20%
1.1
-26%
2.1
-141%
0.87
-0%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=800)
-1%
Idle Average *
1.75
2.17
-24%
2.9
-66%
1.81
-3%
1.49
15%
3
-71%
1.75
-0%
1.741 (0.6 - 6.2, n=799)
1%
Idle Maximum *
1.83
2.25
-23%
2.94
-61%
1.92
-5%
1.76
4%
3.5
-91%
1.83
-0%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=800)
-11%
Load Average *
3.85
4.47
-16%
3.65
5%
7.57
-97%
4.2
-9%
5.3
-38%
3.85
-0%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=794)
-6%
Load Maximum *
6.64
6.15
7%
6.18
7%
9.34
-41%
9.2
-39%
8.3
-25%
6.64
-0%
5.94 (1.2 - 14.2, n=794)
11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
36h 14min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 78)
13h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 18min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 39min
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10+
4300 mAh
LG G8X ThinQ
4000 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Batterijduur
-5%
35%
-10%
13%
5%
Reader / Idle
2174
1747
-20%
2618
20%
1585
-27%
2015
-7%
H.264
1098
854
-22%
1346
23%
934
-15%
957
-13%
WiFi v1.3
823
767
-7%
909
10%
532
-35%
930
13%
912
11%
Load
219
282
29%
408
86%
305
39%
283
29%

Pro

+ sterke SoC
+ snelle en uitbreidbare opslag
+ snelle communicatiemodules
+ goed beeldscherm met uitzonderlijke invoeropties
+ IP68-gecertificeerd
+ snel opladen (bedraad en draadloos)
+ nauwkeurige locatie
+ geweldige gesprekskwaliteit

Contra

- alleen hybride SIM
- nano geheugenkaart in plaats van microSD
- geen aptX of aptX HD
- ontbrekende Google services
- middelmatige luidsprekerkwaliteit

Samenvatting - Huawei laat zijn spierballen zien

De Huawei Mate 30 Pro smartphone. Testmodel geleverd door TradingShenzen.
De Huawei Mate 30 Pro smartphone. Testmodel geleverd door TradingShenzen.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Met de Mate 30 Pro is Huawei er opnieuw in geslaagd een zeer krachtige en high-end smartphone te leveren. Helaas heeft het Chinese bedrijf op verschillende vlakken bezuinigd. De kromming van het beeldscherm is voorlopig zeker uniek en biedt een paar interessante invoeralternatieven, die ook goed werken in het dagelijks leven. Dit gaat echter ten koste van de resolutie en de kleurnauwkeurigheid. Vooral de resolutie past niet bij een smartphone voor deze prijs. We hadden ook graag een 90 of 120 Hz-beeldscherm bij de Mate 30 Pro gezien en op zijn minst de DC dimmen optie. Helaas, deze functies zijn niet aanwezig.

Een hoogtepunt van de Huawei-smartphone zijn de quad-camera's. Met name de extra 40 MP-sensor valt op met video-opnamen en ultragroothoekfoto's in omstandigheden met weinig licht. We raden Huawei aan om de standaardcamera-app aan te passen, omdat we de kleurreproductie van veel van zijn concurrenten prefereren.

De Huawei Mate 30 Pro blijkt een krachtige smartphone te zijn, maar vertoont ook enkele zwakke punten.

De luidspreker onder het beeldscherm is in ieder geval een betere oplossing dan binnen de USB Type-C-poort, hoewel de geluidskwaliteit op vol volume veel te wensen overlaat. De integratie van de M-Pen-ondersteuning is ook geweldig, hoewel Huawei het gebruiksgemak van de actieve stylus kan verbeteren. Kortom, het schrijven met de pen voelt niet natuurlijk aan en de herkenning van handpalmen is niet geweldig.

 

Per saldo is het Huawei gelukt om een ​​zeer goede smartphone te maken die fans zeker niet zal teleurstellen. Iedereen die voor de Chinese versie kiest, moet er rekening mee houden dat deze geen DRM-certificering of Google Play-services heeft. De laatste moet handmatig worden geïnstalleerd, en zelfs dan zullen sommige diensten zoals Google Pay waarschijnlijk niet werken tot het einde van het handelsgeschil tussen China en de VS.

 

 

Huawei Mate 30 Pro - 16-12-2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing
95%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
97%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
68 / 70 → 98%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
89%
Gaming-performance
56 / 64 → 88%
Applicatie-performance
81 / 86 → 94%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
68 / 90 → 75%
Camera
81%
Gemiddelde
82%
89%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Huawei Mate 30 Pro Smartphone: Een sterke smartphone, zelfs zonder Google
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-12-18 (Update: 2019-12-18)