Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Asus ROG Strix GL504GM Hero II (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop

Een held voor het massapubliek. Uitstekend vasthouden van prestaties en een prachtig 144 Hz IPS beeldscherm maken van de GL504 een van de indrukwekkender 15-inch game notebooks op de markt. Een aantal ontbrekende features zorgen ervoor dat het systeem niet een "absolute aanrader" is voor de mainstream gamer.

Asus Strix GL504GM (GL504 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1455 MHz, Geheugen: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 398.2, Optimus
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, SK Hynix, DDR4-2666, PC4-21300, 19-19-19-43, Single-channel
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, 256 GB 
, Secondair: 1 TB WDC WD10SPZX-80Z10T1 HDD
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 26 x 361 x 262
Batterij
66 Wh, 4210 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2x 3.5 watt, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, McAfee LiveSafe, , 12 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.456 kg, Voeding: 590 g
Prijs
1700 USD

 

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Eurocom Sky X4C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.6 MB/s ∼100% +148%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
191 MB/s ∼99% +145%
Asus Strix GL504GM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼40%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75 MB/s ∼39% -4%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +203%
Eurocom Sky X4C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206.3 MB/s ∼85% +158%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼35% +6%
Asus Strix GL504GM
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼33%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
682 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
677 MBit/s ∼99% +3%
Asus Strix GL504GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL504GM
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
675 MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
642 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
585 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
315.9
cd/m²
343.6
cd/m²
317.8
cd/m²
343.6
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
342.7
cd/m²
334.4
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
341.5
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 350 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 337.6 cd/m² Minimum: 18.11 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 350 cd/m²
Contrast: 1061:1 (Zwart: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 2.83
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
92.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Asus Strix GL504GM
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus GL504GS
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus GL503VD-DB74
LG Philips LP156WF6, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
12%
-75%
-45%
8%
-260%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
7.8 (4.4, 3.4)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
8%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-126%
13.6 (7.6, 6)
-74%
6.6 (3.4, 3.2)
15%
36.4 (16.4, 20)
-367%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
15%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-23%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
-15%
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
-0%
26.2 (14, 12.4)
-152%
PWM Frequency
21010 (99)
Screen
7%
16%
11%
-7%
-10%
Brightness middle
350
271
-23%
254
-27%
304.3
-13%
307
-12%
315.9
-10%
Brightness
338
261
-23%
262
-22%
293
-13%
296
-12%
304
-10%
Brightness Distribution
90
86
-4%
89
-1%
80
-11%
89
-1%
88
-2%
Black Level *
0.33
0.32
3%
0.22
33%
0.38
-15%
0.25
24%
0.37
-12%
Contrast
1061
847
-20%
1155
9%
801
-25%
1228
16%
854
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.3
2.61
39%
2.37
45%
1.79
58%
5.74
-33%
4.9
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.78
4.93
37%
4.71
39%
3.69
53%
11.32
-46%
9.7
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.83
2.33
18%
1.84
35%
1.94
31%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
1.97
55%
1.58
64%
1.1
75%
6.44
-46%
3.8
14%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.4 100%
2.48 97%
2.27 106%
2.48 97%
2.24 107%
CCT
7517 86%
6398 102%
6785 96%
6665 98%
8395 77%
6847 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
59
-2%
60
0%
59.8
0%
60
0%
55
-8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92.5
90
-3%
92
-1%
92.8
0%
93
1%
84
-9%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
10% / 8%
-30% / 2%
-17% / 2%
1% / -5%
-135% / -51%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
10.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5.2 ms stijging
↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
7.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4.4 ms stijging
↘ 3.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
206 Points ∼100% +18%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
192 Points ∼93% +10%
Asus Strix GL504GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=31)
173 Points ∼84% -1%
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
Intel Core i7-8550U
172 Points ∼83% -1%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
170 Points ∼82% -2%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼71% -15%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼70% -17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
142 Points ∼69% -18%
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T
Intel Core i7-7500U
141 Points ∼68% -19%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼45% +17%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1359 Points ∼44% +13%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1312 Points ∼42% +9%
Asus Strix GL504GM
Intel Core i7-8750H
1203 Points ∼39%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (915 - 1251, n=32)
1100 Points ∼35% -9%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
710 Points ∼23% -41%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼22% -43%
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD
Intel Core i7-8550U
663 Points ∼21% -45%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
604 Points ∼19% -50%
Asus ZenBook UX530UX-FY070T
Intel Core i7-7500U
307 Points ∼10% -74%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.34 Points ∼100%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.16 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1.92 - 2, n=23)
1.966 Points ∼84%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.72 Points ∼74%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼72%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼70%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.61 Points ∼69%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼58%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.14 Points ∼56%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
14.98 Points ∼55%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (10.5 - 13.4, n=23)
12.3 Points ∼45%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.5 Points ∼28%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.13 Points ∼26%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
6.2 Points ∼23%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7243 Points ∼67%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (6292 - 6643, n=10)
6484 Points ∼60%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
6482 Points ∼60%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5463 Points ∼50%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5426 Points ∼50%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
38810 Points ∼78%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (29952 - 35307, n=10)
33562 Points ∼67%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20528 Points ∼41%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
20061 Points ∼40%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
19801 Points ∼40%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
252.12 s * ∼3%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
247 s * ∼3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (125 - 160, n=4)
147 s * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
120.923 s * ∼1%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (1 - 10645, n=29)
2524 Seconds * ∼11%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
638.9 Seconds * ∼3%
Asus FX504GD
Intel Core i5-8300H
547.965 Seconds * ∼2%
Eurocom Sky X4C
Intel Core i7-8700K
465.128 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
103.98 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1203 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6369 Points ∼82% +17%
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6154 Points ∼79% +13%
Asus Strix GL504GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5463 Points ∼70%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (5019 - 5525, n=5)
5258 Points ∼68% -4%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
5184 Points ∼67% -5%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
5095 Points ∼66% -7%
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
4854 Points ∼63% -11%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5953 Points ∼91% +9%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
5705 Points ∼88% +4%
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
5673 Points ∼87% +4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
5621 Points ∼86% +3%
Asus Strix GL504GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
5474 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (5111 - 5697, n=6)
5472 Points ∼84% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5773 Points ∼95% +32%
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
5390 Points ∼88% +24%
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
4908 Points ∼81% +13%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
4665 Points ∼77% +7%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
4650 Points ∼76% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (4119 - 5371, n=6)
4563 Points ∼75% +5%
Asus Strix GL504GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
4362 Points ∼72%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4362 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5474 punten
Help
Asus Strix GL504GM
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Asus GL504GS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
AS SSD
75%
66%
53%
50%
Copy Game MB/s
1087.7
882.4
-19%
Copy Program MB/s
752.17
370.7
-51%
Copy ISO MB/s
1006.21
1452.41
44%
Score Total
2233
4318
93%
4122
85%
4095
83%
3649
63%
Score Write
724
1983
174%
2051
183%
1955
170%
1446
100%
Score Read
1007
1542
53%
1346
34%
1407
40%
1471
46%
Access Time Write *
0.045
0.035
22%
0.035
22%
0.037
18%
0.041
9%
Access Time Read *
0.072
0.049
32%
0.073
-1%
0.05
31%
0.046
36%
4K-64 Write
520.16
1704.11
228%
1760.16
238%
1663.95
220%
1198.18
130%
4K-64 Read
832.2
1305.47
57%
1170.26
41%
1176.71
41%
1218.4
46%
4K Write
96.46
105.67
10%
107.15
11%
99.18
3%
90.23
-6%
4K Read
32
53.26
66%
48.94
53%
48.56
52%
43.42
36%
Seq Write
1071.18
1729.74
61%
1834.04
71%
1916.59
79%
1580.23
48%
Seq Read
1432.81
1836.5
28%
1266.1
-12%
1819.95
27%
2090.99
46%

* ... kleiner is beter

Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2391.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1154.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 897.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 637.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 521.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 384.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 40.13 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 110.3 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
14228 Points ∼81% +52%
Asus GL504GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
11267 Points ∼64% +20%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
11160 Points ∼63% +19%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
10663 Points ∼61% +14%
Asus Strix GL504GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
9352 Points ∼53%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
8935 Points ∼51% -4%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points ∼47% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (5655 - 12930, n=66)
8206 Points ∼47% -12%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼25% -52%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
3787 Points ∼22% -60%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
27275 Points ∼53% +88%
Asus GL504GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
21058 Points ∼41% +45%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
18687 Points ∼37% +29%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
17401 Points ∼34% +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (12731 - 15607, n=67)
14736 Points ∼29% +2%
Asus Strix GL504GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
14476 Points ∼28%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
14180 Points ∼28% -2%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% -14%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -67%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
4191 Points ∼8% -71%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Combined
Asus GL504GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
6893 Points ∼56% +56%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
5956 Points ∼49% +35%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
4630 Points ∼38% +5%
Asus Strix GL504GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
4421 Points ∼36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (4098 - 4602, n=62)
4306 Points ∼35% -3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
4207 Points ∼34% -5%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
3663 Points ∼30% -17%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1652 Points ∼13% -63%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Asus GL504GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
16525 Points ∼61% +4%
Asus Strix GL504GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
15897 Points ∼59%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
13636 Points ∼50% -14%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
13212 Points ∼49% -17%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
12873 Points ∼47% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (5822 - 17458, n=68)
10631 Points ∼39% -33%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
9758 Points ∼36% -39%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9756 Points ∼36% -39%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4710 Points ∼17% -70%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus GL504GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
16345 Points ∼40% +38%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
14780 Points ∼36% +25%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
12984 Points ∼32% +10%
Asus Strix GL504GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
11829 Points ∼29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
  (10708 - 12298, n=68)
11524 Points ∼28% -3%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H
11315 Points ∼28% -4%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points ∼24% -19%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -65%
Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8250U
3389 Points ∼8% -71%
3DMark 11 Performance
12841 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30707 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10475 punten
Help
lage gem. hoge ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 242.2211198104.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 192133.480.637.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 145.9121.68266.9fps
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30 / 30 / 30 dB (A)
Belasting
41.8 / 50 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 28.5 dB(A)
Asus Strix GL504GM
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Asus GL504GS
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
Aorus X5 v8
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Noise
-12%
0%
-0%
-6%
-13%
off / environment *
28.5
29
-2%
30
-5%
28.1
1%
29
-2%
30
-5%
Idle Minimum *
30
32
-7%
30
-0%
28.1
6%
30
-0%
33
-10%
Idle Average *
30
33
-10%
31
-3%
33
-10%
31
-3%
35
-17%
Idle Maximum *
30
40
-33%
34
-13%
33.5
-12%
33
-10%
40
-33%
Load Average *
41.8
49
-17%
43
-3%
42.2
-1%
49
-17%
45
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
47.6
51
-7%
42
12%
45.3
5%
50
-5%
50
-5%
Load Maximum *
50
53
-6%
44
12%
45.7
9%
52
-4%
55
-10%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 41.4 °C36.8 °C40.8 °C 
 32.6 °C37 °C33.8 °C 
 24.4 °C24.2 °C26 °C 
Maximum: 41.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 33 °C
39.6 °C51.2 °C38 °C
37 °C37 °C30.2 °C
29.4 °C27.2 °C27.6 °C
Maximum: 51.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  50.4 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.4 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203837.52534.2363133.134.34031.734.55031.934.26330.439.28030.247.510030.453.612529.859.716027.465.520028.664.825026.964.131526.464.140025.660.550024.662.163024.462.88002464.8100024.364.3125023.762.6160023.659.9200023.657.8250023.657.4315023.455.1400023.453.7500023.552.5630023.355.3800023.251.91000023.353.5125002347.91600023.138.6SPL35.971.9N2.632.2median 23.7Asus Strix GL504GMmedian 59.7Delta1.64.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHzmedian 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Strix GL504GM audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 10 / 16.9 / 21.1 Watt
Belasting midlight 112.4 / 157.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Strix GL504GM
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus GL504GS
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ-000L7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus ROG GU501GM-BI7N8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Power Consumption
-69%
12%
-2%
-25%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
10
29
-190%
7
30%
14.9
-49%
16
-60%
12.35
-24%
Idle Average *
16.9
32
-89%
11
35%
17.5
-4%
19
-12%
19.98
-18%
Idle Maximum *
21.1
38
-80%
20
5%
19.2
9%
26
-23%
25.44
-21%
Load Average *
112.4
100
11%
98
13%
103.2
8%
103
8%
94.28
16%
Load Maximum *
157.3
217
-38%
182
-16%
132.7
16%
223
-42%
140.63
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
135.5
170
-25%
132
3%
123.1
9%
164
-21%
132.86
2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 55min
Asus Strix GL504GM
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 66 Wh
Asus GL504GS
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 66 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060
8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Asus Zephyrus M GM501
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 55 Wh
Aorus X5 v8
8850H, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 92.24 Wh
Batterijduur
-59%
2%
13%
-54%
Reader / Idle
176
507
237
294
WiFi v1.3
355
146
-59%
362
2%
402
13%
164
-54%
Load
71
81
70
87

Pro

+ 144 Hz beeldscherm met een minimum van ghosting en dunne randen
+ stiller en koeler dan de GL504GS
+ langere batterijduur dan de GL504GS
+ helderder backlight dan de GL504GS
+ twee sloten voor opslagapparaten
+ fantastische luidsprekers
+ makkelijk onderhoud

Contra

- suboptimale plaatsing camere
- niet per-toets RGB-verlichting
- nog steeds erg luid tijdens gamen
- geen Thunderbolt 3
In review: Asus Republic of Gamers GL504GM Hero II. Test models provided by Asus and CUKUSA.com
In review: Asus Republic of Gamers GL504GM Hero II. Test models provided by Asus and CUKUSA.com

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Vergelijkbaar met hoe de Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 koeler, langer en stiller werkt dan de Blade 15 GTX 1070, werkt de GL504GM ook koeler, langer en stiller dan de GL504GS. Er zijn dan ook behalve de kosten enkele redenen waarom je de minder dure GL504GM zou verkiezen boven de GL504GS, daar de GL504GS eigenlijk een krachtiger koeling zou kunnen gebruiken. Er is immers een reden waarom andere 15-inch notebooks met dezelfde GTX 1070 GPU, zoals de MSI GT63, twee keer zoveel heatpipes gebruiken.

Het beste aan de GL504-serie is nog steeds het 144 Hz matte beeldscherm. De dunne beeldschermranden en enorm verbeterde refreshrate en responsetijden van het beeldscherm laten de vorige generatie GL503 modellen erg verouderd lijken. Om het meeste uit de hoge refreshrate te halen is de GL504GS echter nog steeds de beste optie omdat de GTX 1070 nodig is om in de meeste games tot dergelijke framerates te komen. Een upgrade moet nog steeds overwogen worden voor gebruikers van Maxwell GPU's, al was het enkel voor het beeldscherm.

Het ontbreken van G-Sync is jammer, maar de GL504GM compenseert hiervoor met Optimus, wat zorgt voor langere batterijduur en stillere koeling dan de GL504GS. Het is een van de betere 15-inch ontwerpen met dunne beeldschermranden die momenteel beschikbaar zijn, en zeker steviger dan wat de MSI GS65 te bieden heeft.

Asus Strix GL504GM - 31-08-2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Behuizing
82 / 98 → 83%
Toetsenbord
85%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
64 / 81 → 79%
Gewicht
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batterij
88%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
93%
Applicatie-performance
96%
Temperatuur
88 / 95 → 93%
Luidheid
81 / 90 → 90%
Audio
86%
Camera
47 / 85 → 56%
Gemiddelde
80%
87%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Asus ROG Strix GL504GM Hero II (i7-8750H, GTX 1060, FHD) Laptop
Allen Ngo, 2018-09- 3 (Update: 2018-09- 3)