C 2018
Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Eurocom Sky X7C (i7-8086K, GTX 1080, Clevo P775TM1-G) Laptop

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo, 11-08-2018

Core i7-8086K mobiel debuut. De Sky X7C slaagt erin een Core i7-8086K LGA1151-CPU in een 15,6-inch chassis te passen om er een van de snelste gaminglaptops van te maken die momenteel verkrijgbaar zijn. Niettemin zijn de voordelen van de prestaties enigszins marginaal. Het belangrijkste verkoopargument van de Eurocom-laptop is nog steeds het onderhoudsgemak.

Eurocom Sky X7C (Sky Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8086K
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1657 MHz, Geheugen: 10010 MHz, GDDR5X, 398.11
Geheugen
65536 MB 
, PC4-24000 DDR4 Corsair, 1499.6 MHz, 16-18-18-39, Dual-Channel
Beeldscherm
17.3 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, ID: AUO109B, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Opslag
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), 1024 GB 
Geluidskaart
NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Verbindingen
5 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm external 7.1CH audio output; headphone out, microphone in, S/PDIF and Line-in port;, Card Reader: SDXC kaartlezer, 1 Vingerafdruklezer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 39.9 x 418 x 295
Batterij
82 Wh, 5200 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo 2.2 W + 2.5 W subwoofer, Toetsenbord: Afgeschuind, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Service manual, extra screws, drivers disc, thermal paste, 2.5-inch drive brackets, 12 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
4.44 kg, Voeding: 1.54 kg
Prijs
3000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Linkerkant: Gigabit RJ-45, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0, SD kaartlezer
Linkerkant: Gigabit RJ-45, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0, SD kaartlezer
Achterkant: HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, stroomadapter
Achterkant: HDMI 2.0, 2x mini DisplayPort 1.3, stroomadapter
Rechterkant: 3.5 mm 7.1 audio, koptelefoon, microfoon-in, S/PDIF line-in, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
Rechterkant: 3.5 mm 7.1 audio, koptelefoon, microfoon-in, S/PDIF line-in, 2x USB 3.0, Kensington Lock
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
194.3 MB/s ∼98%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼40% -59%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼39% -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Eurocom Sky X7C
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
209.48 MB/s ∼85%
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼35% -58%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼35% -58%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s ∼98%
Aorus X7 DT v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
655 MBit/s ∼95% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
679 MBit/s ∼98%
Aorus X7 DT v8
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
599 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
317.4
cd/m²
326.7
cd/m²
339.9
cd/m²
334.3
cd/m²
333
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
323.3
cd/m²
310.1
cd/m²
333.9
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 352 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 330.1 cd/m² Minimum: 16.7 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 88 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 333 cd/m²
Contrast: 833:1 (Zwart: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.87 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 4.59
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
Eurocom Sky X7C
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3, 3840x2160
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 17.3, 1920x1080
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
CV69H_173WF4 (LGD0459), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Asus Chimera G703GI
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Aorus X7 DT v8
AU Optronics B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 17.3, 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3, 3840x2160
Response Times
79%
14%
72%
54%
-51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.4 (18, 20.4)
8 (4.4, 3.6)
79%
33 (13, 20)
14%
6.4 (3.4, 3)
83%
18 (8.8, 9.2)
53%
60.8 (28.8, 32)
-58%
Response Time Black / White *
26.8 (15.6, 11.2)
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
79%
23 (5, 18)
14%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
60%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
55%
38.4 (22, 16.4)
-43%
PWM Frequency
26000 (19)
204.9 (20)
Screen
22%
-3%
19%
21%
1%
Brightness middle
333
240
-28%
360
8%
285
-14%
297
-11%
230
-31%
Brightness
330
248
-25%
336
2%
275
-17%
281
-15%
207
-37%
Brightness Distribution
88
83
-6%
90
2%
82
-7%
84
-5%
83
-6%
Black Level *
0.4
0.22
45%
0.44
-10%
0.22
45%
0.23
42%
0.2
50%
Contrast
833
1091
31%
818
-2%
1295
55%
1291
55%
1150
38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.87
2.14
64%
4.76
19%
3.18
46%
2.19
63%
5.62
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.74
5.04
48%
10.8
-11%
5.99
39%
4.81
51%
10.24
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.59
1.54
66%
1.73
62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
1.62
64%
3.69
18%
2.93
35%
1.31
71%
4.54
-1%
Gamma
2.34 94%
2.28 96%
2.24 98%
2.45 90%
2.42 91%
2.36 93%
CCT
6384 102%
6846 95%
6091 107%
7165 91%
6464 101%
6625 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88
77
-12%
55
-37%
60
-32%
59
-33%
88
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
84
-16%
93
-7%
91
-9%
100
0%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
51% / 31%
6% / 0%
46% / 27%
38% / 26%
-25% / -7%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
26.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 15.6 ms stijging
↘ 11.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
38.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 18 ms stijging
↘ 20.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8677 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
207 Points ∼100%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
199 Points ∼96% -4%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
190 Points ∼92% -8%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
190 Points ∼92% -8%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points ∼89% -11%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼84% -16%
AMD Ryzen 1800X
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
162 Points ∼78% -22%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
162 Points ∼78% -22%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
149 Points ∼72% -28%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
144 Points ∼70% -30%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
142 Points ∼69% -31%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
138 Points ∼67% -33%
CPU Multi 64Bit
AMD Ryzen 1800X
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
1619 Points ∼52% +15%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1408 Points ∼45% 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
1408 Points ∼45%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
1405 (min: 1375.04, max: 1405.28) Points ∼45% 0%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1388 Points ∼45% -1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
1334 Points ∼43% -5%
MSI GT63 Titan 8RG-046
Intel Core i7-8750H
1091 Points ∼35% -23%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
897 Points ∼29% -36%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
798 Points ∼26% -43%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
723 Points ∼23% -49%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
681 Points ∼22% -52%
HP Spectre x360 15-ch011nr
Intel Core i7-8550U
523 Points ∼17% -63%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.27 Points ∼97% +3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
2.23 Points ∼95% +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
2.2 Points ∼94%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
2.19 Points ∼94% 0%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points ∼90% -5%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
1.78 Points ∼76% -19%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.64 Points ∼70% -25%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
1.63 Points ∼70% -26%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.62 Points ∼69% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
15.76 Points ∼58% +2%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.64 Points ∼58% +1%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
15.41 Points ∼57%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points ∼56% -2%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
15.02 Points ∼55% -3%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
9.78 Points ∼36% -37%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.03 Points ∼30% -48%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
7.48 Points ∼28% -51%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.47 Points ∼28% -52%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
7423 Points ∼69% +13%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
7413 Points ∼68% +13%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
7222 Points ∼67% +10%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
6978 Points ∼64% +7%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
6541 Points ∼60%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
6115 Points ∼56% -7%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
5454 Points ∼50% -17%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5432 Points ∼50% -17%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
4286 Points ∼40% -34%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
39624 Points ∼80% +20%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
39382 Points ∼79% +19%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
39380 Points ∼79% +19%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
33064 Points ∼66%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
29330 Points ∼59% -11%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
28189 Points ∼57% -15%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
21883 Points ∼44% -34%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
21752 Points ∼44% -34%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20324 Points ∼41% -39%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
357.5 s * ∼4% -199%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
229.514 s * ∼3% -92%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
205.94 s * ∼2% -72%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
176.329 s * ∼2% -47%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
119.722 s * ∼1%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
118.6 s * ∼1% +1%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
116.591 s * ∼1% +3%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T
AMD Ryzen 7 1700
677.2 Seconds * ∼3% -34%
Aorus X5S v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
565.023 Seconds * ∼3% -12%
Asus ROG Strix GL702VI-WB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
561.7 Seconds * ∼2% -11%
MSI GV62 8RE-016US
Intel Core i5-8300H
558.56 Seconds * ∼2% -11%
Eurocom Sky X7C
Intel Core i7-8086K
503.822 Seconds * ∼2%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
481.1 Seconds * ∼2% +5%
Eurocom Sky X9C
Intel Core i7-8700K
452.938 Seconds * ∼2% +10%
no name
Intel Core i7-8700K
442.8 Seconds * ∼2% +12%
Eurocom Tornado F5
Intel Core i7-7700K
440.036 Seconds * ∼2% +13%

* ... kleiner is beter

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6831
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
33064
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6541
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
91.96 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.41 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.2 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
155.78 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1408 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
207 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6607 Points ∼85% +4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼84% +3%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
6495 Points ∼84% +2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼82% 0%
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
6369 Points ∼82%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points ∼51% -37%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6093 Points ∼100% +24%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼96% +19%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼94% +17%
Eurocom Sky X9C
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K, 2x Samsung SSD 960 Pro 1TB m.2 NVMe (RAID 0)
5005 Points ∼82% +2%
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
4908 Points ∼81%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points ∼74% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4908 punten
Help
Eurocom Sky X7C
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Asus Chimera G703GI
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
Aorus X7 DT v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-20%
30%
-43%
-28%
-45%
Write 4K
152.2
111.8
-27%
130.2
-14%
88.55
-42%
124
-19%
104.4
-31%
Read 4K
60.4
42.09
-30%
57.33
-5%
30.76
-49%
40.68
-33%
35.69
-41%
Write Seq
3002
2288
-24%
4049
35%
1340
-55%
617.8
-79%
1015
-66%
Read Seq
3329
3321
0%
5325
60%
1362
-59%
2446
-27%
1283
-61%
Write 4K Q32T1
432.9
308.3
-29%
383.2
-11%
305.7
-29%
554.3
28%
308.9
-29%
Read 4K Q32T1
494
364.9
-26%
424.9
-14%
366.8
-26%
627.1
27%
371.9
-25%
Write Seq Q32T1
3391
2440
-28%
4316
27%
1562
-54%
620.4
-82%
1056
-69%
Read Seq Q32T1
3405
3485
2%
8905
162%
2414
-29%
2228
-35%
2204
-35%
2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3405 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3391 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 494 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 432.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3329 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3002 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 60.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 152.2 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
14228 Points ∼81%
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
14119 Points ∼80% -1%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
12215 Points ∼70% -14%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
11498 Points ∼65% -19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (7533 - 14228, n=25)
11220 Points ∼64% -21%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
10351 Points ∼59% -27%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
9771 Points ∼56% -31%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
8935 Points ∼51% -37%
Eurocom X8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4940MX
8693 Points ∼49% -39%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points ∼47% -41%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
7838 Points ∼45% -45%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X9C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 8700K
46773 Points ∼92% +71%
MSI Gaming X GeForce GTX 1080 Desktop PC
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
32126 Points ∼63% +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
  (24868 - 31412, n=25)
28086 Points ∼55% +3%
Eurocom Sky X7C
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K
27275 Points ∼53%
Asus Zephyrus GX501
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ
23540 Points ∼46% -14%
Eurocom X8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M SLI, 4940MX
22072 Points ∼43% -19%
Eurocom Q8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8950HK
21286 Points ∼42% -22%
Eurocom Q6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H
18363 Points ∼36% -33%
Asus ROG Strix GL702ZC-GC204T
AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), 1600
15182 Points ∼30% -44%
Asus Strix GL703GM-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 8750H
14528 Points ∼28% -47%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% -54%
3DMark 11 Performance
22653 punten
Help
lage gem. hoge ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 379.5320.7303.4178.5fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 72fps
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra. Red represents frames per second with Control Center active while Orange is with Control Center disabled. The results mirror our experience on the Eurocom Q8.

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
28.2 / 28.2 / 29 dB (A)
Belasting
41.8 / 42.2 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
Eurocom Sky X7C
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8086K, 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
Aorus X7 DT v8
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8850H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
Noise
-22%
-9%
-21%
-22%
-15%
off / environment *
28.2
30
-6%
30
-6%
29
-3%
29
-3%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
32
-13%
31
-10%
30
-6%
35
-24%
30
-6%
Idle Average *
28.2
34
-21%
32
-13%
34
-21%
36
-28%
31
-10%
Idle Maximum *
29
37
-28%
33
-14%
42
-45%
41
-41%
33
-14%
Load Average *
41.8
43
-3%
38
9%
53
-27%
43
-3%
43
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.2
57
-35%
51
-21%
53
-26%
55
-30%
Load Maximum *
42.2
62
-47%
50
-18%
53
-26%
54
-28%
58
-37%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 35.2 °C38 °C30.2 °C 
 29.8 °C42 °C28.6 °C 
 24.6 °C24.8 °C22.2 °C 
Maximum: 42 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.6 °C
37.4 °C33.8 °C40.2 °C
25 °C25.6 °C29 °C
23 °C24.4 °C25.4 °C
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.3 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  43 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.940.42536.235.23133.334.44031.933.25032.234.46333.433.98029.636.210029.147.81252952.71602856.520027.153.325026.851.831525.457.940025.255.750024.961.763024.259.980023.960.8100023.759.5125023.563.2160023.260200023.260.7250023.159.9315023.156400023.158.7500023.158.763002359.5800023.158.7100002356.61250022.856.11600022.953.6SPL35.671.8N2.531median 23.5median 58.7Delta1.92.935.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseEurocom Sky X7CApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Eurocom Sky X7C audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (63.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 47%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.33 / 1.84 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 33.3 / 40.1 / 42.1 Watt
Belasting midlight 95.6 / 220 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Eurocom Sky X7C
8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB (RAID 0), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), TN, 1920x1080, 17.3
Alienware 17 R3 (A17-9935)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Aorus X7 DT v8
8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Razer Blade Pro 2017
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), Transcend TS1TMTE850, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
-28%
35%
-27%
-6%
-9%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
33.3
31
7%
12
64%
29
13%
23
31%
31
7%
28
16%
Idle Average *
40.1
35
13%
18
55%
37
8%
33
18%
36
10%
37
8%
Idle Maximum *
42.1
45
-7%
26
38%
46
-9%
37
12%
44
-5%
40
5%
Load Average *
95.6
130
-36%
95
1%
156
-63%
115
-20%
107
-12%
109
-14%
Load Maximum *
220
374
-70%
188
15%
314
-43%
281
-28%
258
-17%
353
-60%
Witcher 3 ultra *
152.9
268
-75%
252
-65%
225
-47%
212
-39%
256
-67%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 23min
Eurocom Sky X7C
8086K, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 71 Wh
Aorus X7 DT v8
8850H, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 2017
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Eurocom Sky X9C
8700K, GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop), 89 Wh
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Batterijduur
-9%
59%
38%
-45%
33%
Reader / Idle
225
169
296
253
83
252
WiFi v1.3
143
130
-9%
228
59%
197
38%
78
-45%
190
33%
Load
63
51
80
81
47
77

Pro

+ vele configuratie-opties
+ 4x interne opslagruimtes
+ goede geluidskwaliteit
+ verwisselbare batterij
+ gemakkelijk te onderhouden
+ LGA 1151-aansluiting
+ Thunderbolt 3

Contra

- software vol fouten - zorg ervoor dat u het systeem bijwerkt!
- inconsistente Turbo Boost
- zwaar en prijzig
- korte batterijlevensduur
Getest: Eurocom Sky X7C. Testmodel geleverd door Eurocom
Getest: Eurocom Sky X7C. Testmodel geleverd door Eurocom

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Alvorens onze gedachten te uiten over de Sky X7C, is het noodzakelijk dat eigenaren van het systeem hun software hier bijwerken naar de nieuwste versie. Oudere versies van Control Center bevatten een bug waardoor de GPU onder bepaalde gametoepassingen zoals Witcher 3 slecht presteert. Helaas werd ons testmodel geleverd met de slechte versie van de software en daarom weerspiegelen onze testresultaten deze standaard configuratie. We hebben exact dezelfde resultaten waargenomen in ons recente testrapport van de Eurocom Q8.

Met onze waarschuwing uit de weg is de standaard Core i7-8086K in de Eurocom op zijn best 5 tot 10 procent sneller in ruwe prestaties dan zowel de i7-8700K in de Sky X9C en i9-8950HK in de Aorus X9 DT. Volle belasting bij de basiskloksnelheid van 4.0 GHz zal al een constante kerntemperatuur van 83 °C veroorzaken. De prestatievoordelen bij gamen zijn op zijn zachtst gezegd marginaal.

Het beste aspect van de Sky X7C blijft zijn modulariteit. Liefhebbers die hunkeren naar elk greintje multi-coreprestaties, verkiezen wellicht de goedkopere Ryzen 1800X boven de i7-8086K. Totdat dergelijke AMD-opties beschikbaar komen, is de Sky X7C echter nog steeds de ultieme DTR in het 17-inch segment.

De Sky X7C bevat de snelste Intel-CPU die momenteel beschikbaar is voor mobiel gebruik. Niettemin hopen we dat de Threadripper-opties in de toekomst beschikbaar zullen zijn, gewoon omdat AMD sinds kort extreem concurrerend is in de desktopruimte.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Eurocom Sky X7C (i7-8086K, GTX 1080, Clevo P775TM1-G) Laptop
Allen Ngo, 2018-08-11 (Update: 2018-08-11)