Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Asus ROG Chimera G703GI (i9 8950HK, GTX 1080, Full HD) Laptop

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 12-06-2018

Als een adrenaline-shot. De nieuwe ROG Chimera G703GI van Asus is een van de snelste gaming-laptops die je momenteel op de markt kan vinden. Dankzij de Core i9-8950HK en GeForce GTX 1080 met overclocking, worden zelfs de meest veeleisende games vloeiend weergegeven. G-Sync en een 144-Hz-monitor werken het totaalpakket mooi af.

Asus Chimera G703GI (G703 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-8950HK
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1682 MHz, Geheugen: 2578 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 388.92
Geheugen
65536 MB 
, 4x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel, alle sleuven in gebruik
Beeldscherm
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, Full HD, G-Sync, 144 Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID), 1431 GB 
, + Seagate FireCuda ST2000LX001, hybride harde schijf, 2 TB @5400 rpm; sleuven: 3x M.2 type 2280 & 1x 2.5-inch
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Verbindingen
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 1x koptelefoon, 1x microfoon, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC,MMC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 51 x 425 x 319
Batterij
71 Wh Lithium-Ion, 8 cellen
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2.0, Toetsenbord: chiclet RGB, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 2x 280-Watt-voeding, sticker, sleutelhanger, verschillende tools van fabrikant, McAfee Security testversie, XSplit Gamecaster testversie, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
4.72 kg, Voeding: 1.67 kg
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Formaat Vergelijking

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
187 MB/s ∼93% -6%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼90% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=203)
90.3 MB/s ∼45% -54%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼40% -60%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus Chimera G703GI
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
246 MB/s ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=201)
109 MB/s ∼44% -56%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼35% -65%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
689 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
681 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
681 MBit/s ∼99%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
639 MBit/s ∼93% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=175)
595 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
690 MBit/s ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
601 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
596 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (213 - 697, n=175)
533 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
281
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
272
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 301 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 274.9 cd/m² Minimum: 32 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 82 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 285 cd/m²
Contrast: 1295:1 (Zwart: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.18 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 1.73
ΔE Greyscale 2.93 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Asus Chimera G703GI
B173HAN03.2 (AUO329D), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus G703
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080
Aorus X9 DT
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 3840x2160
Response Times
-90%
12%
-100%
-359%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.4 (3.4, 3)
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-175%
8 (4.4, 3.6)
-25%
18.4 (9.2, 9.2)
-188%
44 (22.8, 21.2)
-588%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 (6, 4.8)
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-4%
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
48%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-11%
24.8 (11.6, 13.2)
-130%
PWM Frequency
26000 (19)
Screen
-15%
9%
15%
-1%
Brightness middle
285
274
-4%
240
-16%
280
-2%
332
16%
Brightness
275
268
-3%
248
-10%
262
-5%
313
14%
Brightness Distribution
82
80
-2%
83
1%
86
5%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.22
0.29
-32%
0.22
-0%
0.22
-0%
0.28
-27%
Contrast
1295
945
-27%
1091
-16%
1273
-2%
1186
-8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.18
3.99
-25%
2.14
33%
1.78
44%
3.86
-21%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.99
7.33
-22%
5.04
16%
3.91
35%
5.88
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.73
1.79
-3%
1.54
11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.93
4.14
-41%
1.62
45%
0.74
75%
4.33
-48%
Gamma
2.45 90%
2.58 85%
2.28 96%
2.43 91%
2.41 91%
CCT
7165 91%
7352 88%
6846 95%
6494 100%
6595 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
77
28%
60
0%
88
47%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
92
-1%
100
8%
92
-1%
100
8%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-53% / -26%
11% / 9%
-43% / -4%
-180% / -61%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
10.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6 ms stijging
↘ 4.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
6.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3.4 ms stijging
↘ 3 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8781 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
latencies
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
206 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
190 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼90% -10%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=413)
151 Points ∼73% -27%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1388 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼99% +5%
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1312 Points ∼95%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
1167 Points ∼84% -11%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼67% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=414)
744 Points ∼54% -43%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.34 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
2.18 Points ∼93% -7%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.09 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=406)
1.679 Points ∼72% -28%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Chimera G703GI
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.14 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Intel Core i7-8700
12.9 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
10.33 Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=507)
7.26 Points ∼48% -52%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.14 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
206 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1312 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6607 Points ∼100%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼99% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5976 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5035 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=115)
4933 Points ∼75% -25%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6281 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
6016 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=310)
4919 Points ∼78% -22%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4849 Points ∼77% -23%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
6093 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5944 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
4865 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=328)
4218 Points ∼69% -31%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
6093 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6281 punten
Help
Asus Chimera G703GI
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
Asus G703
2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
AS SSD
-20%
-28%
-57%
-24%
Score Total
4843
3962
-18%
4066
-16%
2145
-56%
4173
-14%
Score Write
1855
1519
-18%
1553
-16%
916
-51%
1615
-13%
Score Read
1999
1633
-18%
1691
-15%
828
-59%
1716
-14%
4K Write
141.26
148.44
5%
97.68
-31%
98.92
-30%
139.47
-1%
4K Read
57.4
47.61
-17%
38.37
-33%
22.23
-61%
43.65
-24%
Seq Write
4110.47
2556.32
-38%
2196.29
-47%
1018.64
-75%
1771.22
-57%
Seq Read
4885.76
3177.06
-35%
3058.28
-37%
1517.93
-69%
2532.5
-48%
2x Intel 760p 512 GB + 1x Samsung SM961 512 GB (RAID)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 8905 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4316 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 424.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 383.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 5325 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4049 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.33 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 130.2 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22240 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22160 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus Chimera G703GI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21849 Points ∼98%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21422 Points ∼96% -2%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21104 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=441)
10260 Points ∼46% -53%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Chimera G703GI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29696 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29109 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28918 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28621 Points ∼96% -4%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27966 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=515)
11872 Points ∼40% -60%
3DMark 11 Performance
23488 punten
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
214443 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38913 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18999 punten
Help
01234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
77.9 fps ∼100% +2%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
77.4 fps ∼99% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
76.8 fps ∼99% 0%
Asus Chimera G703GI
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
76.7 fps ∼98%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8700
75.6 fps ∼97% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=217)
44.8 fps ∼58% -42%
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 14576.7fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 113103fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30 / 34 / 42 dB (A)
HDD
31 dB (A)
Belasting
53 / 53 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
8700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
-1%
-8%
-2%
8%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
30
-3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=222)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30
35
-17%
32
-7%
36
-20%
34
-13%
31.6 (28 - 41.7, n=643)
-5%
Idle Average *
34
36
-6%
34
-0%
37
-9%
35
-3%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=643)
4%
Idle Maximum *
42
38
10%
37
12%
43
-2%
40
5%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=643)
17%
Load Average *
53
46
13%
43
19%
50
6%
45
15%
40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=644)
24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
48
6%
57
-12%
57
-12%
52
-2%
Load Maximum *
53
54
-2%
62
-17%
61
-15%
60
-13%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=644)
10%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 42 °C44 °C50 °C 
 41 °C42 °C40 °C 
 29 °C30 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 50 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.6 °C
50 °C45 °C48 °C
49 °C42 °C47 °C
30 °C33 °C35 °C
Maximum: 50 °C
Gemiddelde: 42.1 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  53 °C | Kamertemperatuur 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
8700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-2%
9%
8%
6%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
55
-10%
47
6%
43
14%
41
18%
45.5 (28 - 68.8, n=608)
9%
Maximum Bottom *
50
54
-8%
53
-6%
55
-10%
48
4%
49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=606)
2%
Idle Upper Side *
32
29
9%
26
19%
27
16%
30
6%
30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=559)
4%
Idle Bottom *
33
32
3%
27
18%
29
12%
35
-6%
31.6 (21.1 - 50.3, n=557)
4%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.735.52531.229.73129.929.94027.229.25025316326.140.3802451.910023.557.812524.261.816022.866.220025.166.625022.569.431520.373.840019.274.850018.477.363017.878.280017.477.8100017.880.4125017.580.2160017.277.7200017.277250017.477.7315017.377.1400017.576.7500017.272.8630017.269.4800017.467.91000017.365.41250017.258.3160001752.4SPL29.888.8N1.382.3median 17.5median 73.8Delta1.76.143.442.537.237.3303835.538.427.136.327.338.327.247.328.253.225.154.322.464.223.370.42273.920.676.718.877.919.372.318.363.717.866.918.371.817.681.217.184.417.285.917.183.717.179.517.272.717.180.61779.417.177.117.170.717.26516.966.429.892.71.394.7median 17.6median 72.71.96.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Chimera G703GIMSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Chimera G703GI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 29 / 37 / 46 Watt
Belasting midlight 156 / 314 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
8700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
-1%
5%
5%
35%
Idle Minimum *
29
26
10%
31
-7%
28
3%
32
-10%
20.2 (3.9 - 113, n=603)
30%
Idle Average *
37
30
19%
35
5%
37
-0%
38
-3%
25.8 (6.8 - 119, n=603)
30%
Idle Maximum *
46
37
20%
45
2%
40
13%
45
2%
30.9 (8.3 - 122, n=603)
33%
Load Average *
156
123
21%
130
17%
109
30%
96
38%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=594)
33%
Load Maximum *
314
341
-9%
374
-19%
353
-12%
331
-5%
166 (21.9 - 590, n=593)
47%
Witcher 3 ultra *
252
257
-2%
268
-6%
256
-2%
237
6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
2h 49min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
2h 10min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
0h 51min
Asus Chimera G703GI
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 71 Wh
Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 71 Wh
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75 Wh
Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 17
8700, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
13%
29%
49%
14%
80%
Reader / Idle
169
200
18%
225
33%
252
49%
164
-3%
329 (39 - 1174, n=592)
95%
WiFi v1.3
130
151
16%
190
46%
142
9%
250 (78 - 622, n=268)
92%
Load
51
54
6%
63
24%
77
51%
70
37%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=560)
54%
H.264
143
174
148
244 (88 - 506, n=122)

Pro

+ optionele overclocking
+ prima invoerapparatuur
+ uitstekende prestaties
+ RGB-verlichting
+ handige tools
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ 144-Hz-paneel
+ uitstekende audio
+ SSD-RAID
+ G-Sync

Contra

- luidruchtig
- hoog stroomverbruik
- beperkte onderhoudsvriendelijkheid
- korte batterijduur
- screen-bleeding
- zwaar
ROG Chimera G703GI, testtoestel voorzien door Asus Germany
ROG Chimera G703GI, testtoestel voorzien door Asus Germany

Net als zijn voorganger behoort de nieuwe Coffee-Lake-editie van de Asus ROG Chimera G703 tot de beste high-end laptops voor fanatieke gamers.

Als we zijn hoge gewicht en dikke profiel even buiten beschouwing nemen, heeft de behuizing heel wat sterktes. De 17-inch-krachtpatser scoort niet alleen met zijn snelle en contrastrijke 144-Hz-scherm met stabiele kijkhoeken en G-Sync-ondersteuning, maar ook met zijn moderne connecties (Thunderbolt 3) en prima invoerapparatuur.

Op het vlak van prestaties valt er weinig te bekritiseren. In de originele resolutie van het toestel volstaan de hexa-core-CPU en GeForce GTX 1080 om elke game vlot weer te geven. De laptop wordt erg luidruchtig onder belasting, maar de concurrentie, zoals de MSI GT75 8RG en Aorus X9 DT, maken nog meer lawaai in 3D-modus.

Alles bij elkaar genomen scoort de computer juist sterk genoeg voor een "Zeer Goed". In onze Gaming Top 10 kan de G703 opnieuw een toppositie bemachtigen.


Asus Chimera G703GI - 07-06-2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
82 / 98 → 83%
Toetsenbord
89%
Aanwijsapparaat
86%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
71 / 81 → 87%
Gewicht
41 / 10-66 → 55%
Batterij
64%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
100%
Applicatie-performance
100%
Temperatuur
84 / 95 → 88%
Luidheid
59 / 90 → 65%
Audio
88%
Gemiddelde
79%
88%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Asus ROG Chimera G703GI
Asus ROG Chimera G703GI
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Asus ROG Chimera G703GI (i9 8950HK, GTX 1080, Full HD) Laptop
Florian Glaser, 2018-06-12 (Update: 2018-06-12)