Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport MSI GT75 8RG Titan (i9-8950HK, GTX 1080, Full-HD) Laptop

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 15-05-2018

Gaming-gigant. De GT75 8RG Titan markeert de vernieuwde uitgave van MSI's krachtigste en grootste 17-inch-notebook. De desktopvervanger beschikt over een hexa-core-CPU, een 120-Hz-scherm en Nvidia's snelste mobile GPU om zijn hoge claims waar te maken. We vergelijking deze gaming-gigant met zijn meest geduchte concurrenten.

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (GT75 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i9-8950HK
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1582 MHz, Geheugen: 2500 MHz, GDDR5X, ForceWare 390.94
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, 2 van 4 sleuven bezet, max. 64 GB
Beeldscherm
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, Full-HD, G-Sync, 120 Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel CM246
Opslag
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0), 512 GB 
, NVMe SSDs & HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD @ 7,200 RPM. Sleuven: 3x M.2-2280, 1x 2.5-inch
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH
Verbindingen
6 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 1x koptelefoon, 1x microfoon, 1x Line-in, 1x Line-out, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Aquantia AQtion 10Gbit Network Adapter (10/100/1000/10000MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 58 x 428 x 314
Batterij
75 Wh Lithium-Ion, 8 cellen
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: FHD (1080p, 30 fps)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2x 3-W-luidspreker, 1x 5-W-woofer, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, mechanisch, RGB, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 2x 230-W-voeding, garantiekaart, Quick-Start-handleiding, Dragon Center en bijkomende tools van fabrikant, Killer Performance Suite, XSplit Gamecaster, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
4.564 kg, Voeding: 1.56 kg
Prijs
4200 EUR
Links
MSI startpagina
MSI laptopsectie
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Formaat Vergelijking

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks 
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
202 MB/s ∼100% +153%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s ∼90% +128%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=205)
90.1 MB/s ∼45% +13%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s ∼40%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼39% -1%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73.04 MB/s ∼36% -9%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus X9 DT
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s ∼100% +177%
Asus G703
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
240 MB/s ∼100% +176%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=203)
109 MB/s ∼45% +25%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼37% +2%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87.35 MB/s ∼36% 0%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
686 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
681 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
639 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
606 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=182)
595 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
593 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
681 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
628 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
604 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Aorus X9 DT
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
601 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Alienware 17 R4
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1435 Wireless Network Adapter
589 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 721, n=182)
535 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Asus G703
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
506 MBit/s ∼74% -26%
264
cd/m²		265
cd/m²		271
cd/m²
244
cd/m²		240
cd/m²		253
cd/m²
234
cd/m²		224
cd/m²		240
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 271 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 248.3 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 83 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 240 cd/m²
Contrast: 1091:1 (Zwart: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 1.54
ΔE Greyscale 1.62 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
CMN N173HHE-G32 (CMN1747), TN, 1920x1080		Aorus X9 DT
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus G703
AUO B173HAN03.0 (AUO309D), IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
LP173WF4-SPF5 (LGD056D), IPS, 1920x1080		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
AU Optronics B173HW01, IPS, 1920x1080		Alienware 17 R4
TN LED, 2560x1440
Response Times
-122%
-110%
-432%
-457%
-202%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4.4, 3.6)
18.4 (9.2, 9.2)
-130%
17.6 (8.4, 9.2)
-120%
45 (18, 27)
-463%
44 (22, 22)
-450%
30 (18.8, 11.2)
-275%
Response Time Black / White *
5.6 (3.8, 1.8)
12 (6.8, 5.2)
-114%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-100%
28 (6, 22)
-400%
31.6 (16, 15.6)
-464%
12.8 (10.8, 2)
-129%
PWM Frequency
26000 (19)
Screen
11%
-33%
-31%
-19%
-60%
Brightness middle
240
280
17%
274
14%
380
58%
343
43%
402.3
68%
Brightness
248
262
6%
268
8%
362
46%
332
34%
372
50%
Brightness Distribution
83
86
4%
80
-4%
91
10%
83
0%
86
4%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.29
-32%
0.37
-68%
0.35
-59%
0.62
-182%
Contrast
1091
1273
17%
945
-13%
1027
-6%
980
-10%
649
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.14
1.78
17%
3.99
-86%
4.12
-93%
3.35
-57%
5.6
-162%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.04
3.91
22%
7.33
-45%
8.19
-63%
5.62
-12%
9.8
-94%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.54
1.79
-16%
2.5
-62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.62
0.74
54%
4.14
-156%
3.95
-144%
2.4
-48%
4.7
-190%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.43 91%
2.58 85%
2.47 89%
2.35 94%
2.14 103%
CCT
6846 95%
6494 100%
7352 88%
6539 99%
6495 100%
7519 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77
60
-22%
60
-22%
55
-29%
57
-26%
53.7
-30%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
92
-8%
92
-8%
84
-16%
88
-12%
82.2
-18%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-56% / -11%
-72% / -45%
-232% / -97%
-238% / -86%
-131% / -83%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ
De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
   ↔    Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
5.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 3.8 ms stijging
↘ 1.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
   ↔    Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4.4 ms stijging
↘ 3.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 26000 Hz ≤ 19 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 26000 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 19 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 26000 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9064 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
205 Points ∼100%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
185 Points ∼90% -10%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
185 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
184 Points ∼90% -10%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
171 Points ∼83% -17%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
162 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 209, n=423)
152 Points ∼74% -26%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1388 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1378 Points ∼99%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
932 Points ∼67% -32%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
874 Points ∼63% -37%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
867 Points ∼62% -37%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
770 Points ∼55% -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1865, n=424)
751 Points ∼54% -46%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.33 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
2.1 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.09 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
2.08 Points ∼89% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.84 Points ∼79% -21%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.69 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=408)
1.68 Points ∼72% -28%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Aorus X9 DT
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.13 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
Intel Core i9-8950HK
15.05 Points ∼99%
Asus G703
Intel Core i7-7820HK
10.33 Points ∼68% -31%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.55 Points ∼63% -37%
Alienware 17 R4
Intel Core i7-7820HK
9.53 Points ∼63% -37%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.47 Points ∼56% -44%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.2, n=509)
7.28 Points ∼48% -52%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.33 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
15.05 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
205 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1378 Points
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
6558 Points ∼100%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6387 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5290 Points ∼81% -19%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5035 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 6959, n=122)
4944 Points ∼75% -25%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
6123 Points ∼100% +6%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
6055 Points ∼99% +4%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
6016 Points ∼98% +4%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5801 Points ∼95%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5450 Points ∼89% -6%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5088 Points ∼83% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=317)
4931 Points ∼81% -15%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5975 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, 2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)
5944 Points ∼99% +4%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, Transcend TS1TMTE850
5859 Points ∼98% +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK, 2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
5720 Points ∼96%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5221 Points ∼87% -9%
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK, SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
5064 Points ∼85% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=335)
4222 Points ∼71% -26%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5720 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5801 punten
Help
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)		Aorus X9 DT
Transcend TS1TMTE850		Asus G703
2x Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP NVMe (RAID 0)		Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP		Alienware 17 R4
SK Hynix PC300 NVMe 512 GB
AS SSD
-41%
13%
-19%
-18%
-35%
Score Total
4066
2145
-47%
3962
-3%
2581
-37%
2862
-30%
2072
-49%
Score Write
1553
916
-41%
1519
-2%
930
-40%
1029
-34%
858
-45%
Score Read
1691
828
-51%
1633
-3%
1118
-34%
1248
-26%
831
-51%
4K Write
97.68
98.92
1%
148.44
52%
133.79
37%
116.23
19%
113.36
16%
4K Read
38.37
22.23
-42%
47.61
24%
39.52
3%
44.81
17%
35.61
-7%
Seq Write
2196.29
1018.64
-54%
2556.32
16%
1338.19
-39%
1145.25
-48%
734.8
-67%
Seq Read
3058.28
1517.93
-50%
3177.06
4%
2261.03
-26%
2352.48
-23%
1752.03
-43%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
2x Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3485 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2440 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 364.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 308.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3321 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2288 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.09 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 111.8 MB/s
012345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22566 Points ∼100% +5%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22240 Points ∼99% +4%
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
22160 Points ∼98% +3%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21846 Points ∼97% +2%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
21422 Points ∼95%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
20307 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=451)
10264 Points ∼45% -52%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G703
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
29109 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28918 Points ∼99%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
28595 Points ∼98% -1%
Aorus X9 DT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27966 Points ∼96% -3%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
27109 Points ∼93% -6%
Alienware 17 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
26438 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=524)
11902 Points ∼41% -59%
3DMark 11 Performance
23175 punten
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
193287 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42660 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18738 punten
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware 17 R4
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
78.1 fps ∼100% +2%
Asus G703
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
77.9 fps ∼100% +1%
Aorus X9 DT
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
77.4 fps ∼99% +1%
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 8950HK
76.8 fps ∼98%
Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
68.5 fps ∼88% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
65 fps ∼83% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=226)
44.4 fps ∼57% -42%
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 14876.8fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 11060.5fps
FIFA 18 (2017) 427418fps
Need for Speed Payback (2017) 145141fps
Star Wars Battlefront 2 (2017) 139121fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 120113fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
32 / 34 / 37 dB (A)
HDD
34 dB (A)
Belasting
43 / 62 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Noise
-7%
1%
3%
11%
1%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.3
6%
28.2
6%
Idle Minimum *
32
36
-13%
35
-9%
33
-3%
31.5
2%
35.6
-11%
Idle Average *
34
37
-9%
36
-6%
35
-3%
31.6
7%
35.6
-5%
Idle Maximum *
37
43
-16%
38
-3%
37
-0%
31.6
15%
35.7
4%
Load Average *
43
50
-16%
46
-7%
40
7%
36.8
14%
50.2
-17%
Witcher 3 ultra *
57
57
-0%
48
16%
48.2
15%
50.2
12%
Load Maximum *
62
61
2%
54
13%
50
19%
52.1
16%
50.2
19%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 37 °C37 °C47 °C 
 34 °C35 °C44 °C 
 27 °C30 °C28 °C 
Maximum: 47 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.4 °C
53 °C36 °C44 °C
50 °C36 °C42 °C
29 °C26 °C26 °C
Maximum: 53 °C
Gemiddelde: 38 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  49 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-1.3 °C / -2.3 F).
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Heat
-2%
-13%
-5%
14%
-9%
Maximum Upper Side *
47
43
9%
55
-17%
44.2
6%
35.6
24%
49.6
-6%
Maximum Bottom *
53
55
-4%
54
-2%
43
19%
39
26%
56
-6%
Idle Upper Side *
26
27
-4%
29
-12%
32.4
-25%
24.2
7%
29.6
-14%
Idle Bottom *
27
29
-7%
32
-19%
32.8
-21%
27.4
-1%
29.2
-8%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.442.52537.237.33130384035.538.45027.136.36327.338.38027.247.310028.253.212525.154.316022.464.220023.370.42502273.931520.676.740018.877.950019.372.363018.363.780017.866.9100018.371.8125017.681.2160017.184.4200017.285.9250017.183.7315017.179.5400017.272.7500017.180.663001779.4800017.177.11000017.170.71250017.2651600016.966.4SPL29.892.7N1.394.7median 17.6median 72.7Delta1.96.541.441.235.834.629.827.736.933.428.727.325.832.627.443.225.947.124.645.821.753.221.958.522.663.219.867.319.170.717.968.217.764.917.66417.964.817.465.517.165.517.168.117.468.117.46917.463.817.766.817.56217.552.417.452.817.552.817.254.129.8781.344.1median 17.6median 641.66.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI GT75 8RG-090 TitanAorus X9 DT
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Aorus X9 DT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 1.8 / 2.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 31 / 35 / 45 Watt
Belasting midlight 130 / 374 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)		Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
7%
11%
17%
31%
9%
Idle Minimum *
31
28
10%
26
16%
27
13%
21.6
30%
37.5
-21%
Idle Average *
35
37
-6%
30
14%
32
9%
26.4
25%
37.6
-7%
Idle Maximum *
45
40
11%
37
18%
41
9%
26.6
41%
37.6
16%
Load Average *
130
109
16%
123
5%
102
22%
95.6
26%
122.4
6%
Load Maximum *
374
353
6%
341
9%
248
34%
199.6
47%
277.4
26%
Witcher 3 ultra *
268
256
4%
257
4%
221.7
17%
180.3
33%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
3h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2h 54min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 03min
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 75 Wh		Aorus X9 DT
8950HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh		Asus G703
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 71 Wh		Acer Predator 17 X GX-792-76DL
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 88.8 Wh		HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh		Alienware 17 R4
7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Batterijduur
17%
-14%
33%
71%
17%
Reader / Idle
225
252
12%
200
-11%
313
39%
348
55%
276
23%
H.264
174
143
-18%
204
17%
Load
63
77
22%
54
-14%
90
43%
117
86%
69
10%
WiFi v1.3
190
151
251
333
181

Pro

+ mechanisch toetsenbord met RGB-verlichting
+ veel upgrade- en onderhoudsopties
+ grote variëteit aan poorten
+ snel 120-Hz-scherm
+ erg hoge prestaties
+ handige tools van fabrikant
+ prima geluid
+ NVMe-SSD's
+ G-Sync

Contra

- luidruchtige ventilator bij 3D-applicaties
- soms 'coil whine' in inactieve modus
- twee voedingen vereist voor de i9-8950HK CPU
- de behuizing is erg dik en zwaar
- korte batterijduur
MSI GT75 8RG Titan; testtoestel voorzien door MSI Deutschland.
MSI GT75 8RG Titan; testtoestel voorzien door MSI Deutschland.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Als je zijn formaat en gewicht door de vingers kan zien, is de MSI GT75 8RG een hoogwaardige, prima uitgeruste en ongelooflijk krachtige desktopvervanger die doet denken aan de klassieke PC-torens. De GT75 biedt talrijke opties voor onderhoud en upgrades en een grote variëteit aan poorten.

Daarnaast integreert MSI een bliksemsnel 120-Hz-scherm met nauwkeurige kleuren en een degelijk geluidssysteem. De invoerapparatuur is al even indrukwekkend. Een van de hoogtepunten van de GT75 is zijn mechanische toetsenbord, dat een typervaring biedt die de concurrentie ver achter zich laat.

We kunnen de GT75 8RG echter niet onvoorwaardelijk aanbevelen. Net als bij zijn voorganger is het storende ventilatorgeluid een ernstig minpunt. Hoewel het 17-inch-toestel bijna 6 cm dik is, zijn de ventilatoren extreem luid onder belasting; zo luid dat je een koptelefoon nodig hebt om comfortabel te kunnen gamen. Hetzelfde geldt voor de Aorus X9 DT, al is dit toestel slechts 3 cm dik. De vergelijkbare prestaties van de Aorus tonen aan dat MSI's koeling nog wat te wensen over laat.

MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan - 16-05-2018 v6
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
79 / 98 → 81%
Toetsenbord
87%
Aanwijsapparaat
75%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
71 / 81 → 87%
Gewicht
43 / 10-66 → 59%
Batterij
67%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
100%
Applicatie-performance
100%
Temperatuur
85 / 95 → 90%
Luidheid
55 / 90 → 61%
Audio
84%
Gemiddelde
78%
87%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

MSI GT75 8RG Titan
MSI GT75 8RG Titan
MSI GT75 8RG Titan
MSI GT75 8RG Titan
MSI GT75 8RG Titan
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport MSI GT75 8RG Titan (i9-8950HK, GTX 1080, Full-HD) Laptop
Florian Glaser, 2018-05-15 (Update: 2018-05-15)