Kort testrapport Asus ROG Zephyrus GX501 Laptop
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Size Comparison
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
| Asus Zephyrus GX501 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Helderheidsverdeling: 83 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 1312:1 (Zwart: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.02 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 6.32 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
92% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Responstijd Scherm
| ↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 11.6 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 12.4 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (24.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
| ↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
| 40.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 23.2 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (38.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen |  | ||
Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9693 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5057 punten | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5289 punten | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 5125 punten | |
Help | ||
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 39562 punten | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 16821 punten | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 140964 punten | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27935 punten | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14260 punten | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5390 punten | |
Help | ||
| lage | gem. | hoge | ultra | QHD | 4K | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 118 | 61.9 | 43.7 | fps | |||
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 124 | 88 | 48 | fps | |||
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 164 | 144 | 55.6 | fps | |||
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 74.4 | 50.3 | 40 | fps | |||
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 197 | 172 | 65.7 | fps | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 125 | 105 | 43.6 | fps | |||
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 92 | 87 | 41 | fps | |||
| The Division (2016) | 107 | 83.8 | 40.8 | fps | |||
| Doom (2016) | 134 | 128 | 53.9 | fps | |||
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 106 | 97.8 | 38.8 | fps | |||
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 87.3 | 47.9 | 29.6 | fps | |||
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 130 | 113 | 49 | fps | |||
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 131 | 113 | 46.6 | fps | |||
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 123 | 118 | 63.7 | fps | |||
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 78.2 | 66.5 | 43.4 | fps | |||
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 86.7 | 66.7 | 34.9 | fps | |||
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 166 | 140 | 47.4 | fps | |||
| For Honor (2017) | 155 | 115 | 47.9 | fps | |||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 86.7 | 51.9 | 34.1 | fps | |||
| Mass Effect Andromeda (2017) | 81.4 | 73.2 | 35.1 | fps | |||
| Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017) | 88 | 86 | 41.9 | fps | |||
| Prey (2017) | 135 | 131 | 50.5 | fps | |||
| Rocket League (2017) | 235 | 103 | fps | ||||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 136 | 88.4 | fps | ||||
| Team Fortress 2 (2017) | 124 | 125 | fps | ||||
| Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) (2017) | 125 | 111 | 104 | 79 | 27.1 | fps | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 130 | 86 | 64 | 27.2 | fps | ||
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 66 | 38 | fps | ||||
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 75 | 55.9 | 33.7 | fps | |||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 74 | 51.5 | 27.8 | fps | |||
| League of Legends (2019) | 145 | 144 | fps |
Geluidsniveau
| Onbelast |
| 32 / 33 / 34 dB (A) |
| Belasting |
| 39 / 46 dB (A) |
 | ||
30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand) environment noise: 31 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-13.2 °C / -23.8 F).
Asus Zephyrus GX501 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Gigabyte Aero 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
| Uit / Standby | 0.7 / 0.9 Watt |
| Inactief | 18 / 23 / 31 Watt |
| Belasting |
79 / 196 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.
We kunnen na korte tijd met het apparaat enkele nadelen van de slanke behuizing aanwijzen. Het toetsenbord en de GPU prestaties van de GTX 1080 Max-Q hebben met name last van de uitdagende condities. Onze eerste tests suggereren prestaties die meer lijken op het toch ook krachtige GTX 1070 model, niet het hier gebruikte GTX 1080. Het koelingssysteem is - subjectief - comforabel stil dankzij een 40 dB(A) limiet, maar onze gedetailleerde metingen zullen dit met zekerheid kunnen zeggen. Dit geld ook voor het beeldscherm, al is aan twee belangrijk criteria al voldaan met het 120 Hz verversing en matte oppervlakte.
We verwachten momenteel het volledige testrapport volgende week online te hebben... wordt vervolgd!
