Kort testrapport Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Laptop
Concurrerend dankzij Kaby Lake. De geüpdatete Apple MacBook Pro 15 krijgt een moderne Kaby Lake processor van Intel en standaard een krachtiger GPU. Verder is er weinig veranderd.
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
Size Comparison
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Helderheidsverdeling: 86 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 545 cd/m²
Contrast: 1239:1 (Zwart: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.26
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 2880x1800, 15.4 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) APPA031, , 2880x1800, 15.4 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Apple APPA030, , 2880x1800, 15.4 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) 3840x2160, 15.6 | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE BOE NV156QUM-N44, , 3840x2160, 15.6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 2% | -7% | -21% | -45% | -17% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 (23.6, 24.4) | 47.3 (22.1, 25.2) 1% | 46.4 (18.8, 27.6) 3% | 46 (18, 28) 4% | 57.2 (27.2, 30) -19% | 38.4 (20.4, 18) 20% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.8 (19.6, 14.2) | 31.2 (16.7, 14.5) 8% | 39.2 (7.6, 31.6) -16% | 56 (11, 45) -66% | 39.2 (23.6, 15.6) -16% | 24.8 (13.6, 11.2) 27% |
| PWM Frequency | 119000 (80, 210) | 117000 (80, 200) -2% | 119000 (80) 0% | 961.5 -99% | 980.4 (90) -99% | |
| Screen | 12% | 13% | -21% | -68% | -48% | |
| Brightness | 523 | 465 -11% | 532 2% | 401 -23% | 356 -32% | 290 -45% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 92 7% | 83 -3% | 90 5% | 87 1% | 85 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.33 25% | 0.297 32% | 0.3 32% | 0.37 16% | 0.32 27% |
| Contrast | 1239 | 1464 18% | 1912 54% | 1400 13% | 1000 -19% | 991 -20% |
| Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 1.6 | 1.4 12% | 1.4 12% | 3.33 -108% | 5.3 -231% | 3.6 -125% |
| Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.9 | 1.5 21% | 2.3 -21% | 2.73 -44% | 4.6 -142% | 4.2 -121% |
| Gamma | 2.26 106% | 2.34 103% | 2.29 105% | 2.48 97% | 2.31 104% | 2.24 107% |
| CCT | 6834 95% | 6650 98% | 7165 91% | 6457 101% | 6284 103% | 6740 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 77.4 | 78.09 | 88.3 | 59.5 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.9 | 99.97 | 100 | 91.1 | ||
| Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | 7% /
9% | 3% /
8% | -21% /
-21% | -57% /
-60% | -33% /
-37% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
| ↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 19.6 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 14.2 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 86 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (26.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
| ↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
| 48 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 23.6 ms stijging |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms daling | ||
| Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (42.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 119000 Hz | 80 % helderheid instelling |  |
| 210 cd/m² helderheid | |||
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 119000 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 80 % (210 cd/m²) en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 119000 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Fllickering treedt zelfs op aan een relatief hoge helderheid. Daarom kan het de gebruiker in veel alledaagse situaties beïnvloeden. Ter vergelijking: 57 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4054 punten | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4914 punten | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4648 punten |
| 3DMark 06 Standard | 26389 punten | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5566 punten | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15337 punten | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3430 punten | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1207 punten |
Geluidsniveau
| Onbelast |
| 31.3 / 31.3 / 31.7 dB (A) | |||
| Belasting |
| 39.7 / 48.6 dB (A) | |||
 | |||||
30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid |
|||||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand) environment noise: 30.9 dB(A) | |||||
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) Radeon Pro 555, 7700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) Radeon Pro 450, 6700HQ, Apple SSD SM0256L | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) Radeon Pro 455, 6820HQ, Apple SSD SM0512L | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) Radeon Pro 460, 6920HQ, Apple SSD SM1024L | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, Lite-on CX2-8B512-Q11 NVMe SSD | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE Quadro M520, 7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 2% | 6% | -6% | 8% | |
| off / environment * | 30.9 | 30.4 2% | 30.4 2% | 29 6% | 28.4 8% | 29.2 6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.3 | 30.6 2% | 30.8 2% | 30.3 3% | 29 7% | 29.2 7% |
| Idle Average * | 31.3 | 30.6 2% | 30.8 2% | 30.3 3% | 29 7% | 29.2 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.7 | 30.6 3% | 30.8 3% | 30.3 4% | 32.2 -2% | 31.1 2% |
| Load Average * | 39.7 | 34.7 13% | 38.7 3% | 35.1 12% | 47.1 -19% | 36.7 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.5 | 52 -46% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 48.6 | 46.3 5% | 48.8 -0% | 46 5% | 47.1 3% | 39.4 19% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.8 GHz, 555) 7700HQ, Radeon Pro 555, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.7 GHz, 455) 6820HQ, Radeon Pro 455, 76 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) 6920HQ, Radeon Pro 460, 76 Wh | Dell Precision 3520 7820HQ, Quadro M620, 68 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 97 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P51s 20HB000SGE 7600U, Quadro M520, 104 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batterijduur | -5% | -6% | -3% | -1% | 20% | 162% | |
| Reader / Idle | 996 | 831 | 1581 | ||||
| H.264 | 511 | 516 1% | 547 7% | 483 -5% | 700 37% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 644 | 602 -7% | 637 -1% | 619 -4% | 455 -29% | 434 -33% | 712 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 87 | ||||||
| Load | 60 | 55 -8% | 54 -10% | 52 -13% | 79 32% | 103 72% | 323 438% |
Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.
De eerste indruk van de huidige MacBook Pro 15 is na onze eerste tests goed. De prestaties zijn van een vergelijkbaar niveau als de concurrentie dankzij de nieuwe Kaby Lake processoren en de prestaties blijven constant bij langere periodes van belasting. Apple gebruikt nu standaard snellere GPU's. De prestaties hiervan kunnen niet op tegen de huidige middenklasse Pascal GPU's van nVidia, maar daar staat tegenover dat de AMD chips erg zuinig zijn.
We zullen het testrapport in de komende dagen afronden.