Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Asus TUF FX504GD (Core i5-8300H, GTX 1050) Laptop

Gamer voor starters. Asus heeft zijn goedkope FX-serie nog betaalbaarder gemaakt door de batterijcapaciteit, GPU en selectie van poorten te verkleinen. Het eindresultaat is zeker vriendelijker voor de portemonnee, maar het TN beeldscherm en de HDD halen het systeem omlaag.

Asus FX504GD (FX Serie)
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) - 6144 MB, Core: 1354 MHz, Geheugen: 7008 MHz, GDDR5, 388.73, Optimus
Geheugen
8192 MB 
, DDR4-2666, PC4-21300
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, ID: AUO38ED, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, 1027 GB 
, 5400 rpm
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm combo
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 25 x 384 x 262
Batterij
48 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, Asus Hello, 12 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.3 kg, Voeding: 505 g
Prijs
700 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: Kensington Lock
Right: Kensington Lock
Rear: No connectivity (Status LEDs)
Rear: No connectivity (Status LEDs)
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 1.4, USB 2.0, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio
Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 1.4, USB 2.0, 2x USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus FX504GD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
513 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
141 MBit/s ∼21% -79%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus FX504GD
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
614 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
458 MBit/s ∼75% -25%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3168
316 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
242.9
cd/m²
250.6
cd/m²
246.6
cd/m²
236.7
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
228.6
cd/m²
220.5
cd/m²
257.2
cd/m²
222.1
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 260 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 240.6 cd/m² Minimum: 15.76 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 85 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 260 cd/m²
Contrast: 473:1 (Zwart: 0.55 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3, calibrated: 5.27
ΔE Greyscale 6.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
61% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 35.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 1.97
Asus FX504GD
AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus FX503VM-EH73
AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
ID: LG Philips LGD053F, Name: 156WF6, Dell P/N: 4XK13, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
CMN N156HGE-EAL, TN LED, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
LGD05C0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-43%
-48%
-42%
-27%
43%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.6 (19.6, 22)
39 (21, 18)
6%
36.8 (19.6, 17.2)
12%
41 (20, 21)
1%
34.4 (22.4, 12.4)
17%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
60%
Response Time Black / White *
15.2 (10, 5.2)
29 (16, 13)
-91%
31.6 (18.4, 13.2)
-108%
28 (15, 13)
-84%
26 (20, 6)
-71%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
26%
PWM Frequency
21000 (90)
200 (99)
Screen
19%
21%
39%
3%
56%
Brightness middle
260
283
9%
235.9
-9%
257
-1%
265.7
2%
313
20%
Brightness
241
281
17%
235
-2%
229
-5%
243
1%
300
24%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
91
7%
84
-1%
87
2%
78
-8%
Black Level *
0.55
0.39
29%
0.27
51%
0.17
69%
0.63
-15%
0.33
40%
Contrast
473
726
53%
874
85%
1512
220%
422
-11%
948
100%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
7
6.1
13%
4.81
31%
5.34
24%
9.6
-37%
1.29
82%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
22.52
11.08
51%
21.55
4%
9.99
56%
18.5
18%
2.04
91%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
5.27
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.1
5.69
7%
3.1
49%
4.82
21%
12.7
-108%
0.69
89%
Gamma
1.97 112%
2.44 90%
2.31 95%
2.46 89%
2.01 109%
2.43 91%
CCT
7894 82%
6702 97%
6984 93%
6587 99%
13654 48%
6550 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35.5
37
4%
36
1%
38
7%
76
114%
60
69%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61
58
-5%
56
-8%
60
-2%
100
64%
94
54%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-12% / 8%
-14% / 9%
-2% / 25%
-12% / -2%
50% / 54%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
15.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 10 ms stijging
↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
41.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19.6 ms stijging
↘ 22 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8781 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6835
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20061
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6482
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
70.38 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
6.2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.72 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
103.12 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
604 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
170 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5676 Points ∼87% +13%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
5174 Points ∼79% +3%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
5130 Points ∼79% +2%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
5018 Points ∼77%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
4849 Points ∼74% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4746 Points ∼73% -5%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
7238 Points ∼76% +56%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
5054 Points ∼53% +9%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
4646 Points ∼49%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
4608 Points ∼48% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
4390 Points ∼46% -6%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
4940 Points ∼81% +26%
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
4504 Points ∼74% +15%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
3928 Points ∼64% 0%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
3909 Points ∼64%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
3807 Points ∼62% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
3651 Points ∼60% -7%
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
5059 Points ∼65% +33%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
4856 Points ∼63% +28%
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
4568 Points ∼59% +20%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
3995 Points ∼51% +5%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
3808 Points ∼49%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
3380 Points ∼44% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3909 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4646 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5018 punten
Help
Asus FX504GD
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
Asus FX503VM-EH73
SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Average Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
17374%
-10%
38862%
24089%
25%
Write 4K
0.27
51.19
18859%
0.42
56%
158.4
58567%
94.43
34874%
0.4682 (0.179 - 1.27, n=5)
73%
Read 4K
0.586
24.82
4135%
0.41
-30%
45.04
7586%
37.65
6325%
0.533 (0.28 - 0.93, n=5)
-9%
Write Seq
86.83
313.1
261%
55.58
-36%
621.6
616%
1335
1437%
75.6 (53.5 - 101, n=5)
-13%
Read Seq
113.2
458.3
305%
114.3
1%
1592
1306%
1404
1140%
116 (107 - 125, n=5)
2%
Write 4K Q32T1
0.242
208.1
85892%
0.238
-2%
434.2
179321%
268.6
110892%
0.643 (0.238 - 1.22, n=5)
166%
Read 4K Q32T1
0.963
279.3
28903%
0.942
-2%
589.8
61146%
332.8
34459%
1.067 (0.695 - 1.68, n=5)
11%
Write Seq Q32T1
98.43
337.9
243%
68.16
-31%
630.4
540%
1375
1297%
81.9 (63.7 - 98.4, n=5)
-17%
Read Seq Q32T1
110.2
545.3
395%
69.62
-37%
2108
1813%
2627
2284%
97 (69.6 - 114, n=5)
-12%
Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
Overdrachtssnelheid Minimum: 47 MB/s
Overdrachtssnelheid Maximum: 137.2 MB/s
Overdrachtssnelheid Gemiddeld: 100.6 MB/s
Toegangstijd: 20.2 ms
Pieksnelheid: 135.5 MB/s
CPU-gebruik: 3.4 %
3DMark
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
5373 Points ∼27% +97%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
4851 Points ∼24% +77%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
4623 Points ∼23% +69%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
3701 Points ∼19% +35%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
3517 Points ∼18% +29%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
3245 Points ∼16% +19%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
2733 Points ∼14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
  (2192 - 2817, n=23)
2648 Points ∼13% -3%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1988 Points ∼10% -27%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Combined
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
4335 Points ∼35% +84%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
4000 Points ∼33% +69%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
3663 Points ∼30% +55%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
2733 Points ∼22% +16%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
2722 Points ∼22% +15%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
2361 Points ∼19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
  (2099 - 2361, n=34)
2283 Points ∼19% -3%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
2282 Points ∼19% -3%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
1652 Points ∼13% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
1135 Points ∼9% -52%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Physics
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
14558 Points ∼54% +59%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
11246 Points ∼41% +23%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
10498 Points ∼39% +15%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9756 Points ∼36% +7%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9551 Points ∼35% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
  (5524 - 11971, n=38)
9392 Points ∼35% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
9241 Points ∼34% +1%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
9136 Points ∼34%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
6664 Points ∼25% -27%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4710 Points ∼17% -48%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
11483 Points ∼28% +81%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
10263 Points ∼25% +61%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
9608 Points ∼24% +51%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
7953 Points ∼20% +25%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
7348 Points ∼18% +16%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7321 Points ∼18% +15%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
6356 Points ∼16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
  (5329 - 6393, n=38)
6025 Points ∼15% -5%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4133 Points ∼10% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
3291 Points ∼8% -48%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
8828 Points ∼49% +26%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
8633 Points ∼48% +23%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
8343 Points ∼46% +19%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
7952 Points ∼44% +13%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
7696 Points ∼42% +10%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
7025 Points ∼39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
  (4446 - 7607, n=37)
6824 Points ∼38% -3%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
6264 Points ∼35% -11%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4466 Points ∼25% -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4000 Points ∼22% -43%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus FX503VM-EH73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
14550 Points ∼29% +104%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 7300HQ
13075 Points ∼26% +83%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ
12472 Points ∼24% +75%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i7-8705G
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, 8705G
10118 Points ∼20% +42%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
9824 Points ∼19% +38%
Asus GL703GE-ES73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 8750H
9128 Points ∼18% +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
  (6744 - 8223, n=37)
7642 Points ∼15% +7%
Asus FX504GD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H
7133 Points ∼14%
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6500U
4826 Points ∼9% -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad T580-20LAS01H00
NVIDIA GeForce MX150, 8550U
4392 Points ∼9% -38%
3DMark 11 Performance
6971 punten
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
128216 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
18404 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
5656 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
2702 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
1729 punten
Help
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Alienware 13 R3 (i5-7300HQ, GTX 1050 Ti)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
69.8 fps ∼100% +11%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps ∼100% +10%
Asus GL503VD-DB74
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7700HQ, ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB
66 fps ∼95% +5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
64.3 (min: 20.9, max: 125.4) fps ∼92% +2%
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
63 fps ∼90%
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 UX561UD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8550U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN
55.5 fps ∼80% -12%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5
GeForce MX150, 8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
27.9 fps ∼40% -56%
lage gem. hoge ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 192.7167.8151.563fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 119.972.240.922.2fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 85.971.838.231.9fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
29 / 29.2 / 29.7 dB (A)
Belasting
44.3 / 47.7 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
Asus FX504GD
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR
Asus FX503VM-EH73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 7300HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
Noise
0%
-3%
-3%
-5%
-11%
off / environment *
28.1
30.6
-9%
27.8
1%
31
-10%
28
-0%
29
-3%
Idle Minimum *
29
31.9
-10%
29.6
-2%
32.7
-13%
32.2
-11%
30
-3%
Idle Average *
29.2
31.9
-9%
29.6
-1%
32.7
-12%
32.2
-10%
31
-6%
Idle Maximum *
29.7
31.9
-7%
29.6
-0%
32.7
-10%
32.2
-8%
35
-18%
Load Average *
44.3
34.6
22%
37.3
16%
38.7
13%
40.9
8%
49
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40.7
39.3
3%
49.8
-22%
39
4%
45.4
-12%
51
-25%
Load Maximum *
47.7
41.7
13%
53.7
-13%
44.6
6%
48.6
-2%
54
-13%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 41 °C46.4 °C36.8 °C 
 34.4 °C55.8 °C35.4 °C 
 30.8 °C27.2 °C26.4 °C 
Maximum: 55.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.1 °C
39.8 °C42 °C44.4 °C
41 °C51.4 °C41.6 °C
28.8 °C29.4 °C38.4 °C
Maximum: 51.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  55 °C | Kamertemperatuur 23 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.8 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.4 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 41.6 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.3 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-3.7 °C / -6.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.937253536.73133.533.84033.435.2503233.86332.533.78031.831.110028.330.512528.530.516028.740.920027.445.92502750.931526.653.440025.953.950024.854.863024.659.680024.864.7100023.964.8125023.860.2160023.762.6200023.466.3250023.661.7315023.366400023.570.4500023.369.8630023.365.9800023.460.31000023.359.21250023.3511600023.456.3SPL3677.5N2.638.8median 23.8median 59.6Delta1.66.135.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus FX504GDApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus FX504GD audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.44 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 80% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.42 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 7.2 / 10.2 / 10.9 Watt
Belasting midlight 93.3 / 102.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus FX504GD
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX503VM-EH73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1002, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), Toshiba NVMe THNSN5128GP, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 4K
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6
Power Consumption
15%
-35%
-44%
-65%
3%
Idle Minimum *
7.2
5.2
28%
12.8
-78%
14.6
-103%
14
-94%
5.5
24%
Idle Average *
10.2
8.3
19%
15.4
-51%
17.2
-69%
18
-76%
10.5
-3%
Idle Maximum *
10.9
10.1
7%
15.9
-46%
17.3
-59%
22
-102%
10.9
-0%
Load Average *
93.3
62.7
33%
78
16%
82.7
11%
91
2%
72
23%
Load Maximum *
102.5
100
2%
143.4
-40%
136.7
-33%
173
-69%
130.4
-27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
95.8
94
2%
107.3
-12%
107
-12%
142
-48%
97.4
-2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
7h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 43min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
0h 56min
Asus FX504GD
8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 48 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE
7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 45 Wh
Asus FX503VM-EH73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577
7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook), 56 Wh
MSI GP62 7REX-1045US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 41 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Batterijduur
42%
7%
74%
-30%
126%
Reader / Idle
449
634
41%
340
-24%
665
48%
259
-42%
762
70%
WiFi v1.3
223
310
39%
276
24%
405
82%
174
-22%
513
130%
Load
56
81
45%
67
20%
108
93%
41
-27%
156
179%

Pro

+ 2.5-inch SATA III + M.2 NVMe slot
+ ondersteuning voor Intel Optane geheugen
+ relatief lage core temperaturen
+ geen PWM
+ stabiele CPU prestaties
+ goedkoop

Contra

- budget TN paneel: beperkt kleurbereik
- vreemd Turbo Boost gedrag
- zachte touchpad trekt vingervegen aan
- mat beeldscherm is wat korrelig
- geen USB Type-C of SD-kaartlezer
- lastiger onderhoudbaar
- slechte luidsprekers
- korte batterijduur
In review: ASUS TUF FX504GD
In review: ASUS TUF FX504GD

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

We verwelkomen goedkopere en betaalbaardere game notebooks zolang ze hun kernwaarden behouden en een gebalanceerde ervaring bieden. Teveel compromissen sluiten en de nadelen gaan teveel afleiden. Voor $ 700 USD offert de FX504 beeldkwaliteit en ontbreekt een SSD voor een algeheel slechte ervaring. Gebruikers zullen beter afzijn met een investering van $ 100 tot $ 200 meer voor de aanwezigheid van een SSD en een kwalitatief goed IPS paneel.

Notebook gamers die nu beschikken over een i5-7300HQ of i7-7700HQ systeem hoeven niet te upgraden naar de i5-8300H als gamen een prioriteit is. Het is wellicht zelfs beter om te investeren in een systeem met de oudere i7-7700HQ en GTX 1060, daar de prestaties van die combinatie aanzienlijk beter zijn dan de nieuwere i5-8300H met een GTX 1050 of 1050 Ti.

De FX504 schiet ook tekort in de vergelijking met andere budget game systemen. Alternatieven zoals de Legion Y520, Sabre 15 en Inspiron 7577 hebben allen een langere batterijduur en meer poorten, inclusief USB Type-C en SD-kaartlezers. Gamers met een beperkt budget kunnen wellicht beter de FX503 in plaats van de FX504 overwegen, omdat deze in feite hetzelfde systeem is, maar dan makkelijker onderhoudbaar, grotere batterij en beter gebalanceerde CPU en GPU opties.

De FX504GD is een van de goedkoopste game notebooks met een GTX 1050 op de markt. Toch raden we aan om wat meer geld uit te geven aan higher-end SKU's met IPS en SSD opties, of zelfs de oudere FX503 met GTX 1060 voor ongeveer dezelfde prijs.

Asus FX504GD - 24-05-2018 v6
Allen Ngo

Behuizing
75 / 98 → 77%
Toetsenbord
89%
Aanwijsapparaat
75%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
41 / 81 → 51%
Gewicht
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Batterij
73%
Beeldscherm
79%
Gaming-performance
88%
Applicatie-performance
92%
Temperatuur
84 / 95 → 89%
Luidheid
83 / 90 → 92%
Audio
60%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Gemiddelde
73%
79%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Asus TUF FX504GD (Core i5-8300H, GTX 1050) Laptop
Allen Ngo, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06- 3)