Kort testrapport Aorus X5 v8 (i7-8850H, GTX 1070, Full HD) Laptop
Prijzenswaardige zes cores. Gigabyte rust de 2018 versie van de Aorus X5 uit met een hexa-core CPU uit Intel's Coffee Lake-serie. De CPU wordt bijgestaan door een GeForce GTX 1070 en een 144 Hz beeldscherm. In ons testrapport vind je de 15-inch notebook mee kan komen met andere game apparaten.
Size Comparison
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
SDCardreader Transfer Speed | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Aorus X5 v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (11.7 - 202, n=211) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Aorus X5 v8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (13.4 - 257, n=209) |
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Average of class Gaming (141 - 702, n=190) | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Average of class Gaming (144 - 721, n=190) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 87 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 271 cd/m²
Contrast: 1004:1 (Zwart: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.81 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.09 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
Aorus X5 v8 AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 AUO B156HAN07.1 (AUO71ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | Acer Predator Triton 700 AUO B156HAN04.2 (AUO42ED), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 9% | -1% | 39% | -143% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18.8 (10, 8.8) | 16.8 (8.4, 8.4) 11% | 17.6 (9.2, 8.4) 6% | 6.6 (3.4, 3.2) 65% | 44.8 (21.2, 23.6) -138% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12 (7.6, 4.4) | 11.2 (6, 5.2) 7% | 12.8 (7.6, 5.2) -7% | 10.4 (5.2, 5.2) 13% | 29.6 (15.6, 14) -147% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 10% | -9% | -89% | -88% | |
Brightness middle | 271 | 313 15% | 254 -6% | 307 13% | 291 7% |
Brightness | 259 | 300 16% | 262 1% | 296 14% | 277 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 78 -10% | 89 2% | 89 2% | 84 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.33 -22% | 0.22 19% | 0.25 7% | 0.22 19% |
Contrast | 1004 | 948 -6% | 1155 15% | 1228 22% | 1323 32% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 1.81 | 1.29 29% | 2.37 -31% | 5.74 -217% | 5.52 -205% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 3.33 | 2.04 39% | 4.71 -41% | 11.32 -240% | 10.72 -222% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 1.09 | 0.69 37% | 1.58 -45% | 6.44 -491% | 6.59 -505% |
Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.43 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.44 90% |
CCT | 6435 101% | 6550 99% | 6785 96% | 8395 77% | 7816 83% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 60 -2% | 60 -2% | 60 -2% | 58 -5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 94 1% | 92 -1% | 93 0% | 89 -4% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 1.84 | 1.94 | |||
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | 10% /
10% | -5% /
-8% | -25% /
-68% | -116% /
-97% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
12 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 7.6 ms stijging | |
↘ 4.4 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
18.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 10 ms stijging | |
↘ 8.8 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen | |||
Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9308 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Average of class Gaming (79 - 209, n=428) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Average of class Gaming (196 - 1865, n=429) | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.65 - 2.38, n=409) | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Average of class Gaming (1.13 - 21.2, n=510) |
PCMark 10 - Score | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Average of class Gaming (2603 - 6959, n=127) |
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Average of class Gaming (2484 - 6515, n=322) | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Average of class Gaming (2554 - 6093, n=340) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5773 punten | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5953 punten | |
Help |
Aorus X5 v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Acer Predator Triton 700 2x SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND) (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 6% | 58% | 44% | 52% | |
Score Total | 2515 | 2536 1% | 4122 64% | 3649 45% | 3282 30% |
Score Write | 954 | 939 -2% | 2051 115% | 1446 52% | 1243 30% |
Score Read | 1061 | 1092 3% | 1346 27% | 1471 39% | 1350 27% |
4K Write | 84.51 | 80.44 -5% | 107.15 27% | 90.23 7% | 92.99 10% |
4K Read | 23.21 | 23.36 1% | 48.94 111% | 43.42 87% | 41.47 79% |
Seq Write | 965.76 | 1163.11 20% | 1834.04 90% | 1580.23 64% | 2371.95 146% |
Seq Read | 1813.23 | 2212.97 22% | 1266.1 -30% | 2090.99 15% | 2517.2 39% |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Average of class Gaming (385 - 40636, n=458) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Average of class Gaming (513 - 50983, n=532) |
3DMark 06 Standard | 38437 punten | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 18621 punten | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 172098 punten | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37234 punten | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15226 punten | |
Help |
lage | gem. | hoge | ultra | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 113 | 60 | fps | ||
Fortnite (2018) | 166 | 127 | fps | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 53.3 | fps | |||
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) | 87.8 | 65.2 | fps | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 94 | 90 | fps |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Acer Predator Triton 700 | |
Aorus X5 v8 | |
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 | |
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin | |
Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 | |
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 115, n=234) |
Geluidsniveau
Onbelast |
| 33 / 35 / 40 dB (A) |
HDD |
| 33 dB (A) |
Belasting |
| 45 / 55 dB (A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 4% | 11% | 5% | 5% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 30 | 29 3% | 30 -0% | 29 3% | 31 -3% | 29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=236) 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 33 | 30 9% | 30 9% | 30 9% | 33 -0% | 31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=659) 5% |
Idle Average * | 35 | 31 11% | 31 11% | 31 11% | 34 3% | 32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=659) 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 40 | 35 12% | 34 15% | 33 17% | 40 -0% | 34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=659) 13% |
Load Average * | 45 | 49 -9% | 43 4% | 49 -9% | 41 9% | 40.4 (30.3 - 58, n=660) 10% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 51 -2% | 42 16% | 50 -0% | 43 14% | |
Load Maximum * | 55 | 54 2% | 44 20% | 52 5% | 48 13% | 47.6 (38.9 - 64, n=660) 13% |
* ... kleiner is beter
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-13.3 °C / -23.9 F).
Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | 6% | -1% | -13% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 53 -6% | 49 2% | 52 -4% | 61 -22% | 45.6 (28 - 68.8, n=625) 9% |
Maximum Bottom * | 62 | 65 -5% | 63 -2% | 49 21% | 69 -11% | 49.1 (25.9 - 78, n=623) 21% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 26 4% | 24 11% | 31 -15% | 29 -7% | 30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=576) -14% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 30 -3% | 25 14% | 31 -7% | 32 -10% | 31.5 (21.1 - 50.3, n=574) -9% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Aorus X5 v8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Asus Zephyrus M GM501 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Uit / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Inactief | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Belasting |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 31% | 39% | 20% | -2% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 14 44% | 7 72% | 16 36% | 28 -12% | 19.9 (2.7 - 113, n=620) 20% |
Idle Average * | 31 | 18 42% | 11 65% | 19 39% | 33 -6% | 25.5 (6.8 - 119, n=620) 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 33 | 22 33% | 20 39% | 26 21% | 41 -24% | 30.5 (8.3 - 122, n=620) 8% |
Load Average * | 102 | 91 11% | 98 4% | 103 -1% | 94 8% | 104 (14.1 - 319, n=611) -2% |
Load Maximum * | 239 | 173 28% | 182 24% | 223 7% | 222 7% | 166 (21.9 - 590, n=610) 31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 194 | 142 27% | 132 32% | 164 15% | 160 18% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Aorus X5 v8 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8850H, 92.24 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15X v8 GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh | MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh | Asus Zephyrus M GM501 GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H, 55 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 700 GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, 7700HQ, 54 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batterijduur | 124% | 43% | -22% | -40% | 6% | |
Reader / Idle | 294 | 762 159% | 507 72% | 237 -19% | 150 -49% | 336 (39 - 1587, n=605) 14% |
H.264 | 216 | 504 133% | 356 65% | 159 -26% | 106 -51% | 244 (88 - 506, n=125) 13% |
Load | 87 | 156 79% | 81 -7% | 70 -20% | 70 -20% | 78.6 (18 - 202, n=571) -10% |
WiFi v1.3 | 513 | 362 | 164 | 144 | 252 (78 - 622, n=281) |
Pro
Contra
Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.
De 2018 versie van de Aorus X5 v8 kan de strijd met de concurrentie op de meeste vlakken aan. Niet alleen de behoorlijk robuuste metalen behuizing, maar ook qua aansluitingen, invoerapparaten en het beeldscherm kunnen overtuigen. Het 144 Hz IPS paneel biedt het perfecte compromis tussen snelheid en beeldkwaliteit (steekwoord X-Rite Pantone).
Een paar van de grootste minpunten zijn de hoge temperatuur- en geluidsontwikkeling, maar dat is iets dat vaak het geval is bij dunne game notebooks. Al met al plaatsen we de X5 v8 op hetzelfde niveau als de Asus GM501, die vergelijkbare prestaties heeft.
De krachtigste rivaal komt echter van dezelfde fabrikant als de X5 v8. Diegenen die zonder G-Sync kunnen en een paar FPS minder niet een groot probleem vinden, kunnen de Aero 15X overwegen. Dit 15-inch broertje beschikt over een compactere en lichtere behuizing en heeft een veel betere batterijduur, en ook de prijs is lager (€2500 vs. €2700).
Aorus X5 v8 - 15-05-2018 v6
Florian Glaser