Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Aorus X5 v6 Notebook

Geen prestatie-compromissen. De unieke Aorus X5 is terug met Pascal, individueel RGB verlichte toetsen en 120 Hz/5 ms FHD beeldschermopties in een behuizing van net geen 23 mm dik. Gebruikers krijgen dezelfde game prestaties als een desktop met een GTX 1070 grafische kaart, al is het systeemgeluid waarschijnlijk wel aanzienlijk hoger.

Aorus X5 v6 (X5 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-6820HK
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) - 8192 MB, Core: 1442 MHz, Geheugen: 8008 MHz, GDDR5, 369.26
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, DDR4 SDRAM, PC4-19200, G-Skill, Dual-channel, 1300 MHz, 16-16-16-39
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 1:78, 2880 x 1620 pixel 212 PPI, IPS, Panasonic VVX16T028J00, ID: MEI96A2, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Opslag
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB 
, Secondary: 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630
Geluidskaart
NVIDIA GP104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm Kopfhörer (SPDIF), 3.5 mm Mikrofon, Card Reader: SD-kaartlezer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Qualcomm Killer e2200 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.1+LE
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 22.9 x 390 x 272
Batterij
94.24 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2x 1.5 W luidsprekers, 2 W subwoofer, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 2x laptop voetjes, snelstarthandleiding, garantiekaart, USB drive met drivers, Killer Network Manager, Aorus Audio Equalizer, Aorus Fusion, Command & Control, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.575 kg, Voeding: 822 g
Prijs
2400 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.0, 1x HDMI 2.0
Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.0, 1x HDMI 2.0
Rear: AC adapter, 1x USB 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet
Rear: AC adapter, 1x USB 3.0, Gigabit Ethernet
Left: 1x mDP 1.3, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x audio jack, 1x microphone, 1x USB Type-C Gen. 2
Left: 1x mDP 1.3, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x audio jack, 1x microphone, 1x USB Type-C Gen. 2
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
 
136.5 MB/s ∼100% +71%
Aorus X5 v6
 
79.9 MB/s ∼59%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
23.8 MB/s ∼17% -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
 
195.2 MB/s ∼100% +116%
Aorus X5 v6
 
90.3 MB/s ∼46%
MSI GS73VR 6RF
 
27.6 MB/s ∼14% -69%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
548.939 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
530.963 MBit/s ∼97% +2%
Aorus X5 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
519.603 MBit/s ∼95%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
549.653 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
545.763 MBit/s ∼99% +7%
Aorus X5 v6
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
511.927 MBit/s ∼93%
266.4
cd/m²
264.7
cd/m²
283.4
cd/m²
244.6
cd/m²
280.4
cd/m²
270.5
cd/m²
245.9
cd/m²
286.8
cd/m²
295.3
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Maximum: 295.3 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 270.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17.1 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 83 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 280.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1126:1 (Zwart: 0.249 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.94 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 5.13 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
85.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 55.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
Aorus X5 v6
IPS, 15.6, 2880x1620
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte P35X v5
SHP144E , IPS, 15.6, 3840x2160
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD046F), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
8%
11%
-24%
16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 (19, 25)
38 (16, 22)
-12%
51.2 (21.2, 30)
-51%
34 (14, 20)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
32 (8, 24)
23 (5, 18)
28%
26 (8, 18)
19%
39.2 (8.4, 30.8)
-23%
22 (5, 17)
31%
PWM Frequency
198.4
202 (100)
2%
200 (20)
1%
Screen
-2%
6%
-18%
6%
Brightness middle
280.4
315
12%
293
4%
278.9
-1%
273
-3%
Brightness
271
290
7%
279
3%
272
0%
278
3%
Brightness Distribution
83
85
2%
84
1%
80
-4%
88
6%
Black Level *
0.249
0.32
-29%
0.33
-33%
0.562
-126%
0.27
-8%
Contrast
1126
984
-13%
888
-21%
496
-56%
1011
-10%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.94
4.88
1%
3.59
27%
4.47
10%
3.67
26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.13
8.88
-9%
5.79
29%
8.64
-6%
8.33
-2%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.13
4.17
19%
3.86
25%
6.13
-19%
2.73
47%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.53 87%
2.53 87%
2.2 100%
2.49 88%
CCT
7433 87%
6683 97%
7229 90%
7047 92%
7029 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
55.9
55
-2%
63
13%
60.87
9%
55
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
85.9
83
-3%
97
13%
95.43
11%
84
-2%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
3% / 0%
9% / 7%
-21% / -20%
11% / 7%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
32 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 8 ms stijging
↘ 24 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
34 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19 ms stijging
↘ 25 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 198.4 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 198.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 198.4 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 50 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17077 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
171 Points ∼78%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
166 Points ∼76% -3%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
149 Points ∼68% -13%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
144 Points ∼66% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
143 Points ∼66% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
143 Points ∼66% -16%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
139 Points ∼64% -19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
125 Points ∼57% -27%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
865 Points ∼20% +9%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
790 Points ∼18%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
719 Points ∼16% -9%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
707 Points ∼16% -11%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
669 Points ∼15% -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
490 Points ∼11% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
348 Points ∼8% -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
306 Points ∼7% -61%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.94 Points ∼79%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
1.91 Points ∼78% -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
1.7 Points ∼69% -12%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
1.68 Points ∼68% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.63 Points ∼66% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
1.62 Points ∼66% -16%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.59 Points ∼65% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
1.46 Points ∼59% -25%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
9.56 Points ∼22% +7%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
8.9 Points ∼20%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
7.96 Points ∼18% -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
7.76 Points ∼18% -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.4 Points ∼17% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
5.29 Points ∼12% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.84 Points ∼9% -57%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
3.39 Points ∼8% -62%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
6487 Points ∼60% +2%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
6339 Points ∼59%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
5671 Points ∼52% -11%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
5567 Points ∼51% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
5469 Points ∼50% -14%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
5055 Points ∼47% -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
4999 Points ∼46% -21%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
26150 Points ∼40% +8%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
24280 Points ∼37%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
21681 Points ∼33% -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
21022 Points ∼32% -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
20059 Points ∼31% -17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
14329 Points ∼22% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T560-20FH002RGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
10836 Points ∼17% -55%
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
323 s * ∼4% -54%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
233.067 s * ∼3% -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
224.57 s * ∼3% -7%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
210.349 s * ∼2%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
206.294 s * ∼2% +2%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
178.464 s * ∼2% +15%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - ---
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
635.934 Seconds * ∼3% -31%
MSI GE62 2QC-468XPL
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
573.691 Seconds * ∼3% -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50
Intel Core i7-4700HQ
569.349 Seconds * ∼3% -17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
Intel Core i7-6820HK
558.605 Seconds * ∼2% -15%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS
Intel Core i7-6700K
498.33 Seconds * ∼2% -2%
Aorus X5 v6
Intel Core i7-6820HK
486.718 Seconds * ∼2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6782
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
24280
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6339
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.9 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
80.79 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.94 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
123.21 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
790 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
5053 Points ∼77%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
5011 Points ∼76% -1%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4924 Points ∼75% -3%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4859 Points ∼74% -4%
Gigabyte P35X v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3999 Points ∼61% -21%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
4828 Points ∼79%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4651 Points ∼76% -4%
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4541 Points ∼75% -6%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4060 Points ∼67% -16%
Gigabyte P35X v5
GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
3301 Points ∼54% -32%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4828 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
7973 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5053 punten
Help
Aorus X5 v6
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Gigabyte P35X v5
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
MSI GS73VR 6RF
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Eurocom Sky X7E2
Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-64%
-1%
-70%
11%
Write 4k QD32
358.7
256.3
-29%
385.5
7%
167.1
-53%
422.1
18%
Read 4k QD32
687.9
149.4
-78%
592.7
-14%
251.6
-63%
693.5
1%
Write 4k
158.8
75.74
-52%
145.1
-9%
42.51
-73%
144
-9%
Read 4k
52.95
21.44
-60%
51.42
-3%
20.3
-62%
51.54
-3%
Write 512
1221
287.8
-76%
1214
-1%
254.4
-79%
1561
28%
Read 512
989.5
294.8
-70%
1119
13%
242.3
-76%
1180
19%
Write Seq
1275
312.4
-75%
1247
-2%
319
-75%
1576
24%
Read Seq
1565
485.4
-69%
1541
-2%
334.3
-79%
1673
7%
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Sequential Read: 1565 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1275 MB/s
512K Read: 989.5 MB/s
512K Write: 1221 MB/s
4K Read: 52.95 MB/s
4K Write: 158.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 687.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 358.7 MB/s
3DMark
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
5120 Points ∼51% +22%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
4191 Points ∼41%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
4126 Points ∼41% -2%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
3009 Points ∼30% -28%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
2592 Points ∼26% -38%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
2326 Points ∼23% -45%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10382 Points ∼52% +21%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
8556 Points ∼43%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
6123 Points ∼31% -28%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
5541 Points ∼28% -35%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
4663 Points ∼23% -46%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
21781 Points ∼54% +22%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
17869 Points ∼44%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
16685 Points ∼41% -7%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
13018 Points ∼32% -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
11957 Points ∼29% -33%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9820 Points ∼24% -45%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
11482 Points ∼51% +10%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
10423 Points ∼46%
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
10419 Points ∼46% 0%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
9256 Points ∼41% -11%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
9017 Points ∼40% -13%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
8338 Points ∼37% -20%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Eurocom Sky X7E2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 6700K
28321 Points ∼56% +19%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop), 4790K
23990 Points ∼47% +1%
Aorus X5 v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK
23723 Points ∼47%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK
16946 Points ∼33% -29%
EVGA SC17
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK
12890 Points ∼25% -46%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
12731 Points ∼25% -46%
3DMark 11 Performance
18156 punten
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
144778 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
30162 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14476 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
7857 punten
Help
Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
111.3 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
79.3 fps ∼71% -29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
71.6 fps ∼64% -36%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
55.5 fps ∼50% -50%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
43.5 fps ∼39% -61%
Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
118.6 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
75.2 fps ∼63% -37%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
59.5 fps ∼50% -50%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
44.9 fps ∼38% -62%
Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
78.8 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
52.9 fps ∼67% -33%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
136.8 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
106.2 fps ∼78% -22%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
105.5 fps ∼77% -23%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
90.2 fps ∼66% -34%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
69.5 fps ∼51% -49%
Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
117.9 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
88.3 fps ∼75% -25%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
82.1 fps ∼70% -30%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
69.7 fps ∼59% -41%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
50.5 fps ∼43% -57%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
106.6 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
72.4 fps ∼68% -32%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
67.9 fps ∼64% -36%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
63.7 fps ∼60% -40%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
47.5 fps ∼45% -55%
Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
89 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
63 fps ∼71% -29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
62 fps ∼70% -30%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
50 fps ∼56% -44%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
36 fps ∼40% -60%
Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
60 fps ∼100%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
97.4 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
63.5 fps ∼65% -35%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
60.4 fps ∼62% -38%
EVGA SC17
GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe
54.7 fps ∼56% -44%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128
42.8 fps ∼44% -56%
Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
128.9 fps ∼100%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
96.5 fps ∼75% -25%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
84.3 fps ∼65% -35%
Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
162 fps ∼100%
Asus G701VO-CS74K
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)
118.2 fps ∼73% -27%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
106.3 fps ∼66% -34%
lage gem. hoge ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012) 118.6 fps
Guild Wars 2 (2012) 78.8 fps
BioShock Infinite (2013) 136.8 fps
Metro: Last Light (2013) 117.9 fps
Thief (2014) 106.6 fps
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 89 fps
Metal Gear Solid V (2015) 60 fps
Fallout 4 (2015) 111.3 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 97.4 fps
Doom (2016) 128.9 fps
Overwatch (2016) 162 fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
33.4 / 35.2 / 35.2 dB (A)
Belasting
53.3 / 57.6 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 29.3 dB(A)
Aorus X5 v6
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH
Noise
8%
9%
10%
11%
off / environment *
29.3
30
-2%
30
-2%
30
-2%
Idle Minimum *
33.4
32
4%
32
4%
32
4%
31
7%
Idle Average *
35.2
33
6%
33
6%
33
6%
32
9%
Idle Maximum *
35.2
34
3%
34
3%
34
3%
36
-2%
Load Average *
53.3
39
27%
40
25%
37
31%
40
25%
Load Maximum *
57.6
51
11%
46
20%
46
20%
47
18%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 45.6 °C57 °C38.8 °C 
 36.8 °C46.8 °C34 °C 
 33 °C28.2 °C26.6 °C 
Maximum: 57 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.5 °C
46.4 °C48.8 °C54 °C
38.6 °C47.2 °C50.4 °C
34 °C39.2 °C39.4 °C
Maximum: 54 °C
Gemiddelde: 44.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  55.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-4.3 °C / -7.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.2402535.136.33134.837.14033.1345031.632.56332.1348032.33510032.634.112531.834.216030.940.620028.446.625027.848.531527.75240026.556.550025.557.563026.857.880026.556.8100025.154.6125024.859.5160025.659.5200023.951250023.953.2315023.95940002659.450002462.5630023.565.480002363.81000023.164125002361.8160002352.1SPL3772.3N2.929.9median 25.5median 56.8Delta2.15.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAorus X5 v6Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Aorus X5 v6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.31 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.85 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 25 / 28.9 / 30.1 Watt
Belasting midlight 167.3 / 222.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, IPS, 2880x1620, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Asus G701VO-CS74K
6820HK, GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3
Power Consumption
12%
9%
7%
-1%
Idle Minimum *
25
24.3
3%
24.4
2%
22.3
11%
28.2
-13%
Idle Average *
28.9
29.6
-2%
26.6
8%
27.3
6%
32
-11%
Idle Maximum *
30.1
29.9
1%
36.4
-21%
30
-0%
32.6
-8%
Load Average *
167.3
110.1
34%
117
30%
152.2
9%
162.2
3%
Load Maximum *
222.6
171.4
23%
163.6
27%
204.2
8%
173.5
22%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
4h 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 02min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 40min
Aorus X5 v6
6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 94.24 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 62 Wh
MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 75.24 Wh
Gigabyte P35X v5
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, 76 Wh
Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 970M,  Wh
Batterijduur
-12%
17%
28%
162%
Reader / Idle
249
243
-2%
300
20%
345
39%
WiFi v1.3
182
196
8%
246
35%
261
43%
476
162%
Load
100
58
-42%
97
-3%
101
1%

Pro

+ 4x opslagsleuven, 4x SODIMM sloten, 2x HDMI 2.0 poorten
+ erg hoge prestaties; overklokbare CPU en GPU
+ hoge sRGB dekking; hoge kwaliteit WQHD+ paneel
+ 120 Hz/5 ms FHD en WQHD+ beeldschermopties
+ stijlvol design; dun en draagbaar
+ gescheiden kolom van functietoetsen
+ groter en verbeterd touchpad
+ Aorus software met veel functionaliteiten
+ NVMe en RAID compatibel
+ individueel RGB verlichte toetsen
+ makkelijk onderhoud
+ stevige behuizing

Contra

- hoge tonen spoelen en backlight bleeding in testmodel
- hoog stroomverbruik; matige batterijlevensduur
- PWM gemeten op alle helderheidsniveaus
- CPU throttling bij extreme belasting
- ietwat oneven toetsenbord verlichting
- Aorus software is soms lomp
- geen Thunderbolt 3; VGA verwijderd
- luide ventilator bij belasting
- gesoldeerde GPU; geen MXM 3.0 slot
- systeemventilatoren altijd actief
- geen USB-poort aan de linkerzijde
- deksel en scharnier voelen fragiel aan
- gevoelig voor vingerafdrukken
In review: Aorus X5 v6. Test model provided by Aorus.
In review: Aorus X5 v6. Test model provided by Aorus.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Aorus heeft een leuke niche in de game markt voor zichzelf gemaakt door hardware te gebruiken die normaliter in grotere notebooks gevonden, terwijl de behuizing half zo dik is. De X5 v6 biedt zelfs een unieke set eigenschappen zoals 3K 1620p beeldscherm, dual HDMI 2.0 poorten en Live Stream Engine Hardware voor streamers. Waarom een lompe oplossing kopen wanneer de aanzienlijk dunnere Aorus beschikbaar is met vergelijkbare CPU en GPU opties?

Het antwoord heeft minder te doen met prestaties en functionaliteiten en meer met systeemgeluid. De GTX 1070 GPU in ons testmodel presteert net zo goed als ons desktop GTX 1070 referentie model. Prestaties in games worden op geen enkele manier verminderd dus. De 120 Hz/5 ms G-Sync beeldschermopties, individueel verlichte toetsen, 4x interne opslagsleuven met RAID ondersteuning en makkelijk onderhoud onderscheidt de X5 v6 van andere superdunne game notebooks. Verder past het ongewone WQHD paneel erg goed bij de GTX 1070, waar een 4K UHD paneel wellicht wat veel was geweest.

Systeemgeluid is het grootste nadeel. De ventilatoren zijn dermate luid dat je met name in stillere games zoals MGS V wel een koptelefoon moet dragen om niet afgeleid te raken. Andere kleinere nadelen tikken daar nog bij op, zoals de weinig indrukwekkende batterijlevensduur, PWM op alle helderheidsniveaus, gebrek aan Thunderbolt 3 en MXM 3.0 en het throttlen van de CPU bij extreme belasting. Combineer dit laatste nadeel met het opmerkelijke stroomverbruik van de notebook (>200 watt uit een 200 watt ac adapter) en het resultaat is een systeem dat waarschijnlijk net zo goed gepresteerd had met de minder dure Core i7-6700HQ.

De draagbare Aorus X5 v6 is een game notebook met topprestaties, van begin tot eind gemaakt voor hardcore gamers en streamer, met een veelheid aan functionaliteit. Net als andere dunne game notebooks blijft het grootste nadeel het systeemgeluid.

Aorus X5 v6 - 08-10-2016 v5.1(old)
Allen Ngo

Behuizing
80 / 98 → 82%
Toetsenbord
83%
Aanwijsapparaat
86%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
60 / 81 → 75%
Gewicht
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Batterij
69%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
98%
Applicatie-performance
97%
Temperatuur
82 / 95 → 86%
Luidheid
54 / 90 → 60%
Audio
80%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Gemiddelde
76%
83%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Aorus X5 v6 Notebook
Allen Ngo, 2016-10-10 (Update: 2016-10-10)