Kort testrapport Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Laptop: $1000 voor GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Graphics is te veel
Evaluatie | Datum | Model | Gewicht | Hoogte | Formaat | Resolutie | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81 % | 07-2020 | Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 2.3 kg | 25.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83 % | 07-2020 | Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.4 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
83 % | 06-2020 | MSI GP65 10SFK-047US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 27.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % | 06-2020 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | 2.4 kg | 21.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % | 07-2019 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 79 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 271.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 512:1 (Zwart: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.04 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 4.26
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 37.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | MSI GP65 10SFK-047US LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB3, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F BOE NV156FH, WVA, 15.60, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng LGD05CE, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 6% | 61% | 63% | 50% | -13% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.6 (18.4, 15.2) | 34 (16, 18) -1% | 15 (8, 7) 55% | 10.4 (6.4, 4) 69% | 20.4 (10.8, 9.6) 39% | 40 (21.2, 18.8) -19% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 (15.6, 12) | 24 (13, 11) 13% | 9 (5, 4) 67% | 12 (6.8, 5.2) 57% | 10.8 (6.4, 4.4) 61% | 29.6 (17.2, 12.4) -7% |
PWM Frequency | 250 (20) | 198.4 (99) | ||||
Screen | 25% | 29% | 36% | 36% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 271.2 | 280 3% | 309 14% | 384.9 42% | 292 8% | 251 -7% |
Brightness | 252 | 254 1% | 284 13% | 358 42% | 290 15% | 232 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 79 | 88 11% | 88 11% | 87 10% | 77 -3% | 76 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.15 72% | 0.42 21% | 0.67 -26% | 0.27 49% | 0.17 68% |
Contrast | 512 | 1867 265% | 736 44% | 574 12% | 1081 111% | 1476 188% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 5.04 | 5.89 -17% | 3.99 21% | 2.43 52% | 3.99 21% | 6.2 -23% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 16.07 | 19 -18% | 8.3 48% | 4.58 71% | 6.11 62% | 18.6 -16% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated * | 4.26 | 4.79 -12% | 1.12 74% | 2.03 52% | 3.02 29% | 4.8 -13% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 3.4 | 4.08 -20% | 5.43 -60% | 2.6 24% | 3.3 3% | 4.2 -24% |
Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.33 94% | 2.57 86% | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.32 95% |
CCT | 7079 92% | 7303 89% | 7767 84% | 6981 93% | 7047 92% | 7454 87% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.8 | 37 -2% | 63 67% | 59.7 58% | 58.1 54% | 36.5 -3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.5 | 58 -3% | 97 63% | 93.9 58% | 89.7 51% | 57.4 -4% |
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | 16% /
22% | 45% /
34% | 50% /
40% | 43% /
38% | 1% /
10% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
27.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 15.6 ms stijging | |
↘ 12 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
33.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 18.4 ms stijging | |
↘ 15.2 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen | |||
Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9687 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=33) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4775 - 6652, n=33) | |
Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=33) | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Schenker XMG Pro 15 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=32) | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
* ... kleiner is beter
PCMark 10 | |
Digital Content Creation | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Productivity | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Essentials | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Score | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
PCMark 8 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
MSI GP65 10SFK-047US | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4420 punten | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5587 punten | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5466 punten | |
Help |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Eluktronics RP-15 |
* ... kleiner is beter
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GP65 10SFK-047US Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 17% | -18% | 150% | 32% | 99% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 895.31 | 534.73 -40% | 755.35 -16% | 1613.89 80% | 1013.21 13% | 907.05 1% |
Copy Program MB/s | 489.85 | 248.35 -49% | 452.76 -8% | 727.67 49% | 401.88 -18% | 392.55 -20% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 939.1 | 674.64 -28% | 1269.47 35% | 2926.74 212% | 1284.05 37% | 1417.66 51% |
Score Total | 1673 | 2143 28% | 1332 -20% | 5482 228% | 2536 52% | 4323 158% |
Score Write | 940 | 1101 17% | 586 -38% | 2249 139% | 973 4% | 1901 102% |
Score Read | 488 | 701 44% | 489 0% | 2126 336% | 1034 112% | 1619 232% |
Access Time Write * | 0.137 | 0.02 85% | 0.046 66% | 0.091 34% | 0.095 31% | 0.032 77% |
Access Time Read * | 0.07 | 0.087 -24% | 0.24 -243% | 0.042 40% | 0.098 -40% | 0.084 -20% |
4K-64 Write | 758.75 | 845.47 11% | 403.79 -47% | 1877.79 147% | 721.31 -5% | 1538.26 103% |
4K-64 Read | 322.22 | 472.49 47% | 323.8 0% | 1865.15 479% | 853.7 165% | 1282.6 298% |
4K Write | 114 | 164.78 45% | 90.1 -21% | 128.97 13% | 127.96 12% | 118.58 4% |
4K Read | 49.99 | 60.21 20% | 48.88 -2% | 54.18 8% | 41.32 -17% | 40.56 -19% |
Seq Write | 675.39 | 904 34% | 919 36% | 2418.17 258% | 1233.57 83% | 2439.74 261% |
Seq Read | 1157.35 | 1682 45% | 1163 0% | 2065.9 79% | 1386.48 20% | 2955.46 155% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 19% | -2% | 69% | 22% | 51% | |
Write 4K | 125.4 | 219.8 75% | 133.3 6% | 145 16% | 142.1 13% | 112.1 -11% |
Read 4K | 52.73 | 50.16 -5% | 55.34 5% | 46.84 -11% | 46.43 -12% | 42.01 -20% |
Write Seq | 943.1 | 978.7 4% | 980.2 4% | 2377 152% | 1108 17% | 1964 108% |
Read Seq | 1383 | 1990 44% | 1406 2% | 2185 58% | 1622 17% | 2065 49% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 437.9 | 515.8 18% | 286.3 -35% | 463.5 6% | 467 7% | 318.2 -27% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 334.9 | 298.3 -11% | 331.5 -1% | 526.5 57% | 524.5 57% | 406.7 21% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 960.3 | 981.7 2% | 976.2 2% | 2395 149% | 1203 25% | 2534 164% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1530 | 1907.2 25% | 1519.8 -1% | 3470 127% | 2288 50% | 3438 125% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 980.5 | 747.6 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 300.9 | 344.6 | ||||
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen) | 18% /
18% | -10% /
-13% | 110% /
121% | 27% /
28% | 75% /
81% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (9749 - 13027, n=8) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (12865 - 14415, n=8) | |
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 14000 punten | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 33407 punten | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9710 punten | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4131 punten | |
Help |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G | |
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Maingear Vector 15 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS63VR 7RG-005 | |
Asus ROG GA502DU | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile (34.7 - 42.3, n=8) | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT | |
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng | |
MSI GF63 Thin 9SC | |
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng |
lage | gem. | hoge | ultra | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 223.5 | 135.5 | 76.1 | 40.1 | fps |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 148 | 132 | 122 | 115 | fps |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 98.9 | 82.7 | 71.8 | fps |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GP65 10SFK-047US GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | 4% | -2% | 13% | 16% | |
off / environment * | 27.7 | 30.2 -9% | 30 -8% | 29.3 -6% | 28 -1% | 28.8 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 34.2 | 30.2 12% | 30.6 11% | 31.9 7% | 28 18% | 28.8 16% |
Idle Average * | 36 | 30.2 16% | 30.6 15% | 31.9 11% | 28 22% | 29.5 18% |
Idle Maximum * | 36.6 | 30.2 17% | 37.7 -3% | 33.5 8% | 28 23% | 31.1 15% |
Load Average * | 44.3 | 40 10% | 36.5 18% | 47 -6% | 28 37% | 35.2 21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47.9 | 49 -2% | 52.1 -9% | 53.8 -12% | 50.6 -6% | 35.2 27% |
Load Maximum * | 49.3 | 49 1% | 48.1 2% | 56.7 -15% | 50.6 -3% | 41 17% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Geluidsniveau
Onbelast |
| 34.2 / 36 / 36.6 dB (A) |
Belasting |
| 44.3 / 49.3 dB (A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.9 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.6 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.8 °C / 78.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3 °C / 5.4 F).
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Uit / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Inactief | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Belasting |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | MSI GP65 10SFK-047US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Pavilion Gaming 15-cx0003ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS721010A9E630 1 TB HDD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | -66% | -6% | 22% | 14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.7 | 5.4 5% | 14.2 -149% | 6.5 -14% | 4.04 29% | 5.5 4% |
Idle Average * | 9.3 | 10 -8% | 18.8 -102% | 10.6 -14% | 7.2 23% | 8.5 9% |
Idle Maximum * | 20.9 | 10.5 50% | 23.9 -14% | 11 47% | 11.4 45% | 11.9 43% |
Load Average * | 105.1 | 135 -28% | 96.9 8% | 84.1 20% | 80.8 23% | 94 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 94.5 | 144 -52% | 185 -96% | 152.9 -62% | 93.6 1% | 86 9% |
Load Maximum * | 160.8 | 147 9% | 233.4 -45% | 180.4 -12% | 144.5 10% | 144 10% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus TUF A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh | Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | MSI GP65 10SFK-047US i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh | HP Omen 15-dc1020ng i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batterijduur | 18% | 23% | -19% | 9% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 797 | 587 -26% | 671 -16% | 951 19% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 271 | 370 37% | 333 23% | 220 -19% | 372 37% | 385 42% |
Load | 81 | 116 43% | 87 7% | 71 -12% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 59 |
Pro
Contra
Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.
De kenmerken die het meest opvallen, zijn de ondersteuning voor 3x M.2 2280 SSD's, de baseline 144 Hz beeldschermoptie en de LED-balk rond de onderkant van het chassis voor visuele flair. De meeste andere laptops in deze grootteklasse kunnen slechts twee opslagstations bevatten. Anders zijn de prestaties enigszins teleurstellend voor een gamingmachine van $1000, omdat gebruikers vrijwel dezelfde grafische prestaties kunnen krijgen van een oudere en goedkopere GTX 1060-laptop of zelfs bijna 50 procent snellere prestaties van systemen die op de GTX 1660 Ti draaien door slechts $100 tot $200 meer uit te geven.
Bovendien klinkt het 144 Hz-scherm hier goed op papier, maar dit specifieke Panda-paneel heeft grote compromissen, waaronder de beperktere kleurruimte, meer opvallende ghosting en een lage contrastverhouding. De game-ervaring is daarom niet zo soepel of kleurrijk als het had kunnen zijn, tenzij gebruikers bereid zijn meer uit te geven aan de 144 Hz-optie.
Voor $1000 biedt de Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI niet een overtuigende GPU om het de moeite waard te maken, vooral nu gaming-laptops met AMD Ryzen van de grond komen. Gebruikers zullen gelukkiger zijn met de prestaties van een Asus TUF-model of GTX 1660 Ti-alternatief voor ongeveer dezelfde prijs.
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI - 04-11-2020 v7
Allen Ngo