Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PB51RF-G) Laptop: Fun and games

Een wolf in schapenvacht. De XMG Pro 15 ziet er op het eerste gezicht misschien niet bijzonder spannend uit, maar hij heeft heel wat in zijn mars. Schenker Technologies heeft een six-core-processor gecombineerd met een GeForce RTX 2070, die voor erg vlotte frame rates zorgt, zelfs bij het spelen van moderne games. Lees meer over de andere sterke en zwakke punten van de 15-inch-laptop in ons gedetailleerde testrapport.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (vertaald door Siemon Boes),
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8192 MB, Core: 1215 MHz, Geheugen: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 442.19, Optimus
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual Channel, alle sleuven bezet, max. 64 GB
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, Slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 & 1x 2.5 inch
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 1 microfoon, 1 koptelefoon, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 Vingerafdruklezer
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 30 x 359 x 258
Batterij
62 Wh, 5500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2.0, Toetsenbord: Chiclet RGB, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 230-Watt-voeding, USB-stick, handleiding, reinigingsdoekje, driver DVD, 2.5-inch-accessoire, Control Center, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.53 kg, Voeding: 680 g
Prijs
2104 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
83 %
02-2020
Schenker XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.5 kg30 mm15.6"1920x1080
82 %
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.4 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080
81 %
05-2019
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
85 %
12-2019
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.3 kg26.9 mm15.6"1920x1080
87 %
03-2019
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
3.5 kg38 mm15.6"1920x1080

Formaat Vergelijking

386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg359 mm 258 mm 30 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 26.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG Pro 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 212, n=278)
92.8 MB/s ∼45% -55%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.9 MB/s ∼13% -87%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Schenker XMG Pro 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
224 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=276)
110 MB/s ∼49% -51%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.8 MB/s ∼13% -87%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1330 MBit/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=319)
679 MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 (min: 541, max: 677) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=319)
630 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
580 (min: 497, max: 619) MBit/s ∼42% -58%
ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
21 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
19 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Pro 15: 18.43 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 29.9 ∆E
Testbeeld Schenker XMG Pro 15
Testbeeld Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
357
cd/m²
352
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
366
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 366 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 345.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 89 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 346 cd/m²
Contrast: 1236:1 (Zwart: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 1.58
ΔE Greyscale 4.95 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
94% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
Schenker XMG Pro 15
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
17%
40%
12%
-8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.2 (8, 9.2)
15 (8, 7)
13%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
58%
13.2 (7.2, 6)
23%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6, 5.2)
9 (5, 4)
20%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
21%
11.2 (6, 5.2)
-0%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-14%
PWM Frequency
250 (20)
23150 (19)
Screen
-7%
0%
9%
1%
Brightness middle
346
309
-11%
286
-17%
277.4
-20%
263
-24%
Brightness
346
284
-18%
275
-21%
264
-24%
264
-24%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
90
1%
90
1%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.28
0.42
-50%
0.37
-32%
0.24
14%
0.17
39%
Contrast
1236
736
-40%
773
-37%
1156
-6%
1547
25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.62
3.99
14%
2.19
53%
1.51
67%
4.45
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.93
8.3
7%
4.4
51%
4.93
45%
8.33
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.58
1.12
29%
2.27
-44%
1.77
-12%
1.93
-22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.95
5.43
-10%
2.2
56%
3.7
25%
4.77
4%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.57 86%
2.41 91%
2.23 99%
2.52 87%
CCT
7733 84%
7767 84%
6405 101%
7061 92%
7767 84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
63
3%
59
-3%
65.1
7%
60
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
97
3%
91
-3%
99.1
5%
93
-1%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
5% / -3%
20% / 6%
11% / 10%
-4% / -1%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
11.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6 ms stijging
↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
17.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 8 ms stijging
↘ 9.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 50 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 18115 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280Tooltip
Schenker XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1023 (1010.13-1155.97)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1177 (1160.19-1270.77)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼100% +17%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points ∼98% +14%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
178 Points ∼88% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼87% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=576)
159 Points ∼78% -9%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points ∼100% +40%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼90% +27%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1288 Points ∼79% +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼73% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1156 (min: 1010.13, max: 1155.97) Points ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=580)
886 Points ∼55% -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=96)
441 Points ∼93% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
430 Points ∼91% +2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
423 Points ∼89% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points ∼89%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points ∼100% +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=97)
2837 Points ∼81% +18%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
2753 Points ∼79% +14%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2507 Points ∼72% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2410 Points ∼69%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1156 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points ∼100% +37%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6452 Points ∼94% +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼82% +13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5625 Points ∼82% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=269)
5303 Points ∼77% +6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5013 Points ∼73%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
-19%
-6%
-12%
Write 4K
120.6
133.3
11%
97.04
-20%
125.7
4%
129.9
8%
Read 4K
46.13
55.34
20%
49.58
7%
45.04
-2%
47.15
2%
Write Seq
2900
980.2
-66%
1838
-37%
2361
-19%
1840
-37%
Read Seq
2929
1406
-52%
2421
-17%
1987
-32%
1775
-39%
Write 4K Q32T1
372.2
286.3
-23%
326.9
-12%
407.1
9%
294.5
-21%
Read 4K Q32T1
422.2
331.5
-21%
372.9
-12%
536.9
27%
373.6
-12%
Write Seq Q32T1
3245
976.2
-70%
1894
-42%
2398
-26%
3295
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3565
1519.8
-57%
2828
-21%
3309
-7%
3535
-1%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3565 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3245 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 422.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 372.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2929 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2900 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.13 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
20935 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37846 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17762 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
7508 punten
Help
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Schenker XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4474 Points ∼100%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4467 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4346 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4155 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1097 - 6005, n=93)
4073 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
3958 Points ∼88% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20997 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20762 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20759 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19846 Points ∼95% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19123 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=601)
11926 Points ∼57% -43%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26975 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26140 Points ∼97%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25845 Points ∼96% -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25500 Points ∼95% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
24267 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=678)
14238 Points ∼53% -46%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Schenker XMG Pro 15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø75.8 (68-80)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
78.4 fps ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
74.4 (min: 62) fps ∼95%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K
73 (min: 60) fps ∼93% -2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
72 (min: 61, max: 84) fps ∼92% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=369)
51.9 fps ∼66% -30%
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 142 74.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 153 140 130 122 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 110 95.5 81.1 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 68.5 41.1 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 103 100 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 190 189 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 89 67 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 104 75.4 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 113 92.9 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 83.5 78.1 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 92.2 90.7 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 66.8 42.4 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.534.933.734.936.32544.14440.739.539.83134.833.635.930.733.14039.536.135.233.337.35033.435.331.530.441.46339.734.530.827.941.28048.232.230.825.648.910033.730.527.426.636.212534.633.626.727.536.816037.632.627.425.139.220035.93124.823.637.425039.130.623.922.84031541.131.625.222.942.540041.828.521.919.842.850043.529.123.51944.663044.528.82117.44480042.927.9191842.6100044.829.219.117.844.7125045.529.81918.845.5160046.330.918.818.246.4200046.330.619.518.546250046.329.419.218.345.9315043.223.8191843.140004322.219.418.243.3500042.221.619.818.641.6630039.120.519.918.53980003420.320.118.8341000032.420.320.819.132.11250029.920.62119.4301600024.521.321.519.824.9SPL55.939.932.330.855.8N10.93.41.81.511median 41.8median 29.1median 20.8median 18.8median 42.5Delta4.53.92.71.83.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker XMG Pro 15

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30 / 32 / 40 dB (A)
Belasting
56 / 56 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
9%
2%
6%
-1%
8%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=371)
2%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.6
-2%
31
-3%
33
-10%
32
-7%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=794)
-5%
Idle Average *
32
30.6
4%
33
-3%
33
-3%
33
-3%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=794)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
40
37.7
6%
38
5%
33.1
17%
36
10%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=794)
13%
Load Average *
56
36.5
35%
50
11%
38
32%
55
2%
40.9 (28 - 59, n=795)
27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55
52.1
5%
53
4%
52.9
4%
57
-4%
Load Maximum *
56
48.1
14%
56
-0%
57.8
-3%
59
-5%
48.4 (38.9 - 64.1, n=795)
14%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 42 °C42 °C43 °C 
 39 °C41 °C42 °C 
 29 °C30 °C30 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Gemiddelde: 37.6 °C
41 °C42 °C42 °C
43 °C41 °C39 °C
33 °C31 °C31 °C
Maximum: 43 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.1 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  50 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Schenker XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-14%
-16%
-17%
-5%
-9%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
45.6
-6%
54
-26%
45
-5%
45
-5%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=759)
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
43
55.5
-29%
47
-9%
53
-23%
48
-12%
49.7 (25.9 - 78, n=757)
-16%
Idle Upper Side *
29
31.8
-10%
33
-14%
31.2
-8%
30
-3%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=711)
-6%
Idle Bottom *
30
33.3
-11%
34
-13%
39
-30%
30
-0%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=709)
-6%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.933.62539.542.33130.733.34033.335.85030.431.36327.932.88025.631.210026.629.812527.531.716025.130.520023.635.125022.850.531522.960.740019.870.75001969.363017.468.38001874.7100017.877.1125018.874.5160018.274.5200018.576.4250018.376.731501874.2400018.268.3500018.671.8630018.570.1800018.8711000019.170.21250019.467.51600019.861.9SPL30.885.7N1.564.9median 18.8median 70.1Delta1.811.243.544.238.639.731.232.235.237.428.428.826.329.125.830.326.736.524.237.422.750.525.658.326.361.721.763.72061.518.859.91858.918.261.817.96419.164.718.162.917.265.517.767.417.767.617.565.517.76517.665.817.563.817.56117.35817.349.330.576.81.440.8median 18median 61.82.44hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Pro 15Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Pro 15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1.4 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 15 / 19 / 26 Watt
Belasting midlight 101 / 245 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
13%
-24%
1%
-61%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
15
11.4
24%
24
-60%
15
-0%
35
-133%
19.1 (1.9 - 113, n=755)
-27%
Idle Average *
19
13.5
29%
27
-42%
18.5
3%
39
-105%
24.5 (6.6 - 119, n=755)
-29%
Idle Maximum *
26
21.6
17%
33
-27%
20.2
22%
47
-81%
30 (8.3 - 122, n=755)
-15%
Load Average *
101
106
-5%
129
-28%
110.9
-10%
117
-16%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=746)
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
177
186
-5%
176
1%
187.3
-6%
196
-11%
Load Maximum *
245
196
20%
216
12%
260
-6%
299
-22%
174 (21.9 - 590, n=745)
29%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
5h 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 28min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 12min
Schenker XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
60%
2%
-9%
-16%
17%
Reader / Idle
312
353
13%
371
19%
194
-38%
356 (39 - 1174, n=705)
14%
WiFi v1.3
208
333
60%
220
6%
216
4%
157
-25%
264 (62 - 622, n=417)
27%
Load
72
62
-14%
35
-51%
83
15%
79.4 (18 - 202, n=672)
10%
H.264
154
261 (88 - 554, n=155)

Pro

+ individuele configuratie
+ matige temperaturen
+ G-Sync of Optimus
+ RGB-verlichting
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ dunne schermranden
+ 144 Hz

Contra

- erg luide ventilatoren onder belasting
- geluidskwaliteit zou beter mogen
- matige batterijduur
Getest: Schenker XMG Pro 15. Testtoestel voorzien door bestware.com
Getest: Schenker XMG Pro 15. Testtoestel voorzien door bestware.com

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De XMG Pro 15 overbrugt perfect de kloof tussen de dunne lichtgewicht-laptops en de klassieke desktopvervangers. Gebruikers die de voorkeur geven aan een compacte behuizing maar hiervoor geen prestaties willen opgeven, zijn aan het juiste adres.

De Core i7-9750H en GeForce RTX 2070 kunnen alle huidige titels met maximale details weergeven en zijn de ideale metgezel voor fanatieke gamers. Ons testtoestel biedt ook RGB-toetsenbordverlichting, veel upgrade- en configuratie-opties en een breed scala aan beschikbare poorten, waaronder Thunderbolt 3. Het responsieve en contrastrijke 144-Hz scherm is ook een geweldige feature.

Helaas ondermijnen de ventilatoren het verder uitstekende concept. Het feit dat de ventilatoren soms zonder goede reden in actie schieten en dat ze bij 3D-taken erg luid worden, merken we wel vaker bij Clevo Barebones. De zwakke batterijduur heeft ook een negatieve invloed gehad op de totaalscore.

Schenker XMG Pro 15 - 19-02-2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
74 / 98 → 76%
Toetsenbord
83%
Aanwijsapparaat
78%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
73 / 80 → 92%
Gewicht
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batterij
55 / 95 → 57%
Beeldscherm
84%
Gaming-performance
93%
Applicatie-performance
91%
Temperatuur
89 / 95 → 93%
Luidheid
56 / 90 → 62%
Audio
75%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Gemiddelde
73%
83%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PB51RF-G) Laptop: Fun and games
Florian Glaser, 2020-02-25 (Update: 2020-02-25)