Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Laptop: Voor koopjesjagers

AMD ten aanval. Al jaren zijn ze marktleiders op het gebied van prestaties, maar nu ervaren Intel en Nvidia steeds meer prijsdruk. Dit is de "fout" van apparaten zoals de MSI Bravo 15, die we in zijn configuratie hebben getest met een Ryzen 7 4800H en een Radeon RX 5300M.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn,
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR (Bravo 15 Serie)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 8 x 2.9 - 4.2 GHz, Renoir (Zen 2)
Grafische kaart
AMD Radeon RX 5300M - 3072 MB, Core: 1036 MHz, Geheugen: 14000 MHz, GDDR6, Adrenalin 19.40.30, Switchable Graphics
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dual Channel, alle slots bezet, 64 GB max.
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, Full-HD, FreeSync, glimmend: nee, 144 Hz
Moederbord
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Opslag
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280 (allemaal bezet)
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC233 @ AMD K17.6 - Audio Processor
Verbindingen
4 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm audiopoort
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 22 x 359 x 254
Batterij
51 Wh, 4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3 cellen
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2x 2W, Toetsenbord: Chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 180-Watt stroomadapter, Dragon Center, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.96 kg, Voeding: 632 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
80 %
07-2020
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M
2 kg22 mm15.6"1920x1080
80 %
07-2020
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
2.2 kg24 mm15.6"1920x1080
80 %
07-2019
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.2 kg26.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
80 %
10-2019
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.7 kg23.7 mm15.6"1920x1080
82 %
07-2019
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
2.3 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080

Size Comparison

364 mm 273 mm 23.7 mm 2.7 kg360.4 mm 262 mm 26.8 mm 2.2 kg363 mm 255 mm 24 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 254 mm 22 mm 2 kg
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1340 MBit/s ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=331)
697 MBit/s ∼50% -48%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
691 MBit/s ∼50% -48%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
646 MBit/s ∼46% -52%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
586 MBit/s ∼42% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1340 MBit/s ∼100% +13%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1190 MBit/s ∼89%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼51% -43%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s ∼50% -43%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=331)
650 MBit/s ∼49% -45%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Realtek RTL8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCIe Adapter
617 MBit/s ∼46% -48%
ColorChecker
13.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR: 11.29 ∆E min: 3.76 - max: 20.52 ∆E
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
322
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
317
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 329 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 313 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 88 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 311 cd/m²
Contrast: 723:1 (Zwart: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 2.65
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
86% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.129
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, 1920x1080
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
Panda LM156LF-2F01 (NCP004D), IPS, 1920x1080
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Panda LM156LF-GL, IPS, 1920x1080
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO23ED), IPS, 1920x1080
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
LGD05CE, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-172%
-128%
-194%
-168%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 (7.6, 8.4)
40.8 (19.2, 21.6)
-155%
30.4 (14, 16.4)
-90%
48 (22.8, 25.2)
-200%
40 (21.2, 18.8)
-150%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 (6, 4.4)
30 (16.8, 13.2)
-188%
27.6 (17.6, 10)
-165%
30 (16.8, 13.2)
-188%
29.6 (17.2, 12.4)
-185%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-11%
-30%
-19%
-23%
Brightness middle
311
287
-8%
286.2
-8%
234
-25%
251
-19%
Brightness
313
271
-13%
267
-15%
216
-31%
232
-26%
Brightness Distribution
88
88
0%
84
-5%
87
-1%
76
-14%
Black Level *
0.43
0.25
42%
0.33
23%
0.22
49%
0.17
60%
Contrast
723
1148
59%
867
20%
1064
47%
1476
104%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.77
-6%
5.45
-21%
6.52
-45%
6.2
-38%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.97
17.15
-115%
18.08
-127%
10.58
-33%
18.6
-133%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.65
3.73
-41%
4.47
-69%
3.56
-34%
4.8
-81%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.3
2.7
18%
5.3
-61%
5.33
-62%
4.2
-27%
Gamma
2.129 103%
2.115 104%
2.1 105%
2.86 77%
2.32 95%
CCT
7227 90%
7187 90%
7679 85%
5983 109%
7454 87%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63
43
-32%
37.6
-40%
36
-43%
36.5
-42%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
86
61
-29%
59.1
-31%
57
-34%
57.4
-33%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-92% / -36%
-79% / -45%
-107% / -46%
-96% / -45%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
10.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6 ms stijging
↘ 4.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
16 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 7.6 ms stijging
↘ 8.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17916 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750Tooltip
: Ø1697 (1664.03-1741.33)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
186 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points ∼96% -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼92% -8%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
169 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=588)
160 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
157 Points ∼84% -16%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1741 (min: 1664.03, max: 1741.33) Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (min: 1313.46, max: 1397.77) Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=592)
896 Points ∼51% -49%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
818 Points ∼47% -53%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
799 Points ∼46% -54%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
769 Points ∼44% -56%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
643 Seconds * ∼100% -126%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=58)
403 Seconds * ∼63% -42%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * ∼54% -21%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
284 Seconds * ∼44%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
47520 MIPS ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=58)
35882 MIPS ∼76% -24%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
20736 MIPS ∼44% -56%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5674, n=58)
4820 MIPS ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
4626 MIPS ∼96% +1%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4584 MIPS ∼95%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS ∼93% -2%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
477 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=104)
444 Points ∼93% -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points ∼90% -10%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
419 Points ∼88% -12%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
404 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
386 Points ∼81% -19%
CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
3956 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=105)
2887 Points ∼73% -27%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
Intel Core i5-9300H
1821 Points ∼46% -54%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1793 Points ∼45% -55%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
1723 Points ∼44% -56%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7453 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (3448 - 10190, n=39)
6557 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points ∼71% -29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (874 - 1401, n=39)
1199 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1154 Points ∼96%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points ∼92% -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
11.7 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 18.9, n=58)
9.78 fps ∼84% -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps ∼79% -21%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
Intel Core i5-9300H
5.7 fps ∼49% -51%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
93.9 s ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s ∼68% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.6 - 95.8, n=34)
59.5 s ∼63% -37%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec * ∼100% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.546 - 0.761, n=39)
0.621 sec * ∼99% -4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.597 sec * ∼95%

* ... kleiner is beter

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1741 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
111 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
186 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5639 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=276)
5312 Points ∼94% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
4892 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
4873 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4732 Points ∼84% -16%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H, KBG30ZMS128G
4615 Points ∼82% -18%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1422.9 μs * ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H, SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
1000.2 μs * ∼70% +30%

* ... kleiner is beter

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
SK Hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
KBG30ZMS128G
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-31%
-31%
-67%
-14%
Write 4K
118.3
94.71
-20%
137.5
16%
65.35
-45%
112.1
-5%
Read 4K
43.73
38.91
-11%
56.96
30%
29.71
-32%
42.01
-4%
Write Seq
2854
1056
-63%
983.8
-66%
128.8
-95%
1964
-31%
Read Seq
2302
1183
-49%
1564
-32%
858.9
-63%
2065
-10%
Write 4K Q32T1
418.5
445.3
6%
237.4
-43%
95.85
-77%
318.2
-24%
Read 4K Q32T1
517.1
477.7
-8%
340.7
-34%
197.6
-62%
406.7
-21%
Write Seq Q32T1
3008
1063
-65%
958.8
-68%
132.5
-96%
2534
-16%
Read Seq Q32T1
3568
2154
-40%
1732
-51%
1208
-66%
3438
-4%
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3568 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3008 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 517.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 418.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2302 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2854 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.73 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 118.3 MB/s
3DMark 06 Standard
36032 punten
3DMark Vantage P Result
39264 punten
3DMark 11 Performance
14048 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
32417 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9404 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
3872 punten
Help
05101520253035404550Tooltip
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø38.5 (34-41)
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=223)
5948 Points ∼100% +68%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
3773 Points ∼63% +7%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3568 Points ∼60% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3565 Points ∼60% +1%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
3539 Points ∼59%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3488 Points ∼59% -1%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=610)
12036 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
10550 Points ∼88%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
10209 Points ∼85% -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9536 Points ∼79% -10%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9428 Points ∼78% -11%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
9239 Points ∼77% -12%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
14437 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=687)
14394 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
13927 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13575 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13447 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
13233 Points ∼92% -8%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=383)
52.4 fps ∼100% +37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H
38.3 (min: 29) fps ∼73% 0%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
38.3 (min: 31) fps ∼73%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
37 fps ∼71% -3%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
36.2 fps ∼69% -5%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
34.4 (min: 26) fps ∼66% -10%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=327)
92.9 fps ∼100% +55%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, R5 4600H
67.7 (min: 56) fps ∼73% +13%
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R7 3750H
62.7 fps ∼67% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
62.2 fps ∼67% +4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H
60 (min: 48) fps ∼65%
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
59.8 (min: 50) fps ∼64% 0%
lage gem. hoge ultra
GTA V (2015) 163 86.1 42.6 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 178 122 60 38.3 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 113 108 97.9 94.7 fps
Fortnite (2018) 131 114 81.8 58.2 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 98.4 51.6 29.3 fps
Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018) 118 70.4 60.8 38.3 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 51.5 39.5 34.9 fps
Monster Hunter World (2018) 80.6 60.1 52.2 42.6 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 114 60 48 36 fps
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) 72 59 42 25 fps
Hitman 2 (2018) 74.5 65.7 55.8 48.8 fps
Battlefield V (2018) 140 91.8 79.4 70.8 fps
Darksiders III (2018) 155 76.8 62.2 54.9 fps
Just Cause 4 (2018) 108 79.1 56 52.5 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 143 87.2 68.6 67.6 fps
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 88 69 64 58 fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 105 51.2 36.1 28.6 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 190 110 89.9 49.5 fps
The Division 2 (2019) 120 75 63 42 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 83.4 60.3 39.7 20.6 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 121 54.8 30.4 29.8 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 176 106 94 81 fps
Control (2019) 132 41.8 29.4 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 97.3 63.6 40.9 36 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 190 172 160 153 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 82 51 41 22 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 164 76.8 54.8 25.5 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 127 72.2 57.9 47 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 78.6 67.9 58.6 52.9 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 71.2 61.1 53.1 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 95.4 41.2 32.1 fps
Escape from Tarkov (2020) 121 80.5 70.1 56.7 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 137 53 43.2 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start 0 game wont start fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 231 100 66.4 47.5 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.335.535.837.338.52537.838.739.437.943.13132.7343333.235.64035.137.433.632.937.15049.237.836.733.848.86334.134.131.734.136.58030.529.329.729.631.910028.329.231.329.433.212527.928.530.728.831.916029.725.927.825.133.920029.724.928.125.534.12502923.324.722.233.631530.722.826.522.736.340031.32225.921.637.450031.521.325.519.936.863033.620.326.91938.280032.119.926.618.337.610003519.730.21840.5125036.920.63118.342.5160037.419.831.51843200038.119.330.317.643.6250036.818.827.517.943.4315038.818.525.718.144.3400037.918.124.81844.6500035.718.121.91841.7630029.518.118.917.936.7800028.71818.217.835.91000024181817.831.51250020.617.817.817.726.81600018.717.817.717.721.7SPL47.931.639.630.753.7N61.73.11.59.1median 31.3median 19.8median 26.5median 18.1median 36.8Delta3.12.64.12.13.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Bravo 15 A4DCR

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
31 / 32 / 40 dB (A)
Belasting
48 / 54 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
5%
11%
2%
17%
6%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
28.2
6%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
29.3 (25 - 32, n=384)
2%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
28.2
9%
31
-0%
28.8
7%
31.4 (25 - 42, n=807)
-1%
Idle Average *
32
32
-0%
28.2
12%
32
-0%
29.5
8%
32.6 (26 - 46.6, n=807)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
40
34
15%
31.4
21%
35
12%
31.1
22%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=807)
13%
Load Average *
48
46
4%
39.8
17%
49
-2%
35.2
27%
41.1 (28 - 59, n=808)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
47
2%
47
2%
47
2%
35.2
27%
Load Maximum *
54
49
9%
50.2
7%
53
2%
41
24%
48.4 (38.9 - 64.1, n=808)
10%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 51 °C51 °C48 °C 
 47 °C47 °C41 °C 
 34 °C35 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Gemiddelde: 42.9 °C
42 °C49 °C50 °C
32 °C39 °C41 °C
31 °C31 °C29 °C
Maximum: 50 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  47 °C | Kamertemperatuur 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.3 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the device average of 33.3 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.2 °C / -13 F).
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
5%
3%
7%
16%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
49
4%
41.2
19%
49
4%
40.3
21%
46 (28 - 68.8, n=771)
10%
Maximum Bottom *
50
50
-0%
40
20%
55
-10%
48.5
3%
49.8 (25.9 - 78, n=769)
-0%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28
7%
34.6
-15%
25
17%
23.9
20%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=723)
-2%
Idle Bottom *
31
28
10%
34.4
-11%
26
16%
24.6
21%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=721)
-3%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.840.82539.644.43132.536.2403642.35043.746.16332.137.28032.135.410030.431.81253036.116029.444.52002853.325025.965.131523.767.340020.571.850020.47263022.771.980018.774.9100017.969.4125018.870.5160018.274200017.672.5250017.664.1315017.766.9400017.968.5500017.968630017.873.4800017.871.21000017.871.61250017.670.71600017.663.6SPL31.383.1N1.760.8median 18.2median 69.4Delta3.26.631.832.133.433.327.530.333.93434.530.231.430.825.727.223.726.522.42622.733.421.940.521.454.119.753.819.463.218.762.41871.417.969.818.469.218.270.417.96917.468.117.767.317.866.217.760.417.661.317.661.517.664.417.664.517.463.117.356.130.179.11.444.3median 17.9median 63.11.48.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Bravo 15 A4DCRAcer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.7 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 11 / 14 / 25 Watt
Belasting midlight 72 / 163 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
33%
25%
28%
29%
-44%
Idle Minimum *
11
5
55%
7
36%
4
64%
4.04
63%
19 (1.9 - 113, n=767)
-73%
Idle Average *
14
8
43%
9.9
29%
7
50%
7.2
49%
24.4 (6 - 119, n=767)
-74%
Idle Maximum *
25
13
48%
12
52%
12
52%
11.4
54%
30 (8.3 - 122, n=767)
-20%
Load Average *
72
69
4%
68.4
5%
95
-32%
80.8
-12%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=758)
-44%
Witcher 3 ultra *
100
78
22%
94.9
5%
86
14%
93.6
6%
Load Maximum *
163
124
24%
130.9
20%
135
17%
144.5
11%
175 (21.9 - 590, n=757)
-7%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
6h 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
4h 28min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
0h 53min
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR
R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, 51 Wh
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
R5 4600H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 57.48 Wh
Asus TUF FX505DT-EB73
R7 3750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 48 Wh
Dell G5 15 5590-PCNJJ
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 60 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1020ng
i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 52.5 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
82%
27%
111%
69%
11%
Reader / Idle
418
828
98%
466
11%
867
107%
951
128%
357 (39 - 1174, n=714)
-15%
WiFi v1.3
268
520
94%
285
6%
482
80%
385
44%
264 (62 - 622, n=426)
-1%
Load
53
82
55%
87
64%
131
147%
71
34%
79.6 (18 - 243, n=681)
50%
H.264
482
262 (88 - 554, n=158)
Witcher 3 ultra
59
56.5 (50 - 66, n=6)

Pro

+ compacte afmetingen
+ zeer goede CPU-prestaties
+ laag gewicht
+ 144 Hz beeldscherm

Contra

- toetsenbordindeling moet wennen
- hoog systeemgeluid onder belasting
- behuizing zou stabieler kunnen zijn
- laag aantal poorten
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR, testmodel geleverd door MSI Taiwan
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR, testmodel geleverd door MSI Taiwan

Fans van AMD-chips zullen (zeer) tevreden zijn met de Bravo 15.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Als je de magere poortselectie, de vrij korte batterijduur en het hoge geluidsniveau tijdens 3D-toepassingen buiten beschouwing laat, is de Bravo 15 een aantrekkelijk pakket voor prijsgevoelige gamers die nieuwe normen stelt voor CPU-prestaties in het bereik van $1000. De Ryzen 7 4800H biedt veel vermogen en is toekomstbestendig. Het 144-Hz-beeldscherm is in hoge mate bevredigend.

 

We raden potentiële kopers echter aan om de configuratie met de Radeon RX 5500M te kiezen vanwege het beperkte video-geheugen van de Radeon RX 5300M (4 GB in plaats van 3 GB GDDR6). Het voordeel dat gebruikers brengt is de meerprijs zeker waard.

MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR - 07-07-2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
73 / 98 → 74%
Toetsenbord
75%
Aanwijsapparaat
75%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
53 / 80 → 66%
Gewicht
64 / 10-66 → 96%
Batterij
60 / 95 → 64%
Beeldscherm
84%
Gaming-performance
85%
Applicatie-performance
93%
Temperatuur
84 / 95 → 88%
Luidheid
64 / 90 → 72%
Audio
81%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Gemiddelde
72%
80%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
MSI Bravo 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Laptop: Voor koopjesjagers
Florian Glaser, 2020-07-18 (Update: 2020-07-18)