Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport ZTE Axon 11 5G: Betaalbare 5G smartphone

Slank en licht. Met de Axon 11 5G vertrouwt ZTE op de naam van de smartphone die het al heeft uitgebracht. Een blik op het specificatieblad laat echter zien dat dit totaal verschillende smartphones zijn, zelfs als je de 5G-modem uit de vergelijking haalt. Lees onze recensie om te zien wat de ZTE Axon 11 5G te bieden heeft.
Mike Wobker, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (vertaald door Notebookcheck),
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Axon Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Geheugen
6144 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.47 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, capacitief, AMOLED, glimmend: ja, 60 Hz
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C , Card Reader: microSD (FAT, FAT32, exFAT, up to 2 TB), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: bewegingssensor, gyroscoop, naderingssensor, kompas, USB-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G GSM (B2/B3/B5/B8), 3G UMTS (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8), 4G LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B20/B26/B28), 5G (n1/n3/n7/n28/n38/n41/n77/n78), LTE, 5G, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.9 x 159.2 x 73.4
Batterij
4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.9, 25mm, 1/1.72", 0.8µm), 8MP (f/2.2, 16mm), 2MP (f/2.4), 2MP (f/2.4), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.0, 1/2.8", 1.0μm)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1 speaker, 1 ear-piece, Toetsenbord: onscreen, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB power adapter, USB Type-C cable, 3.5-mm stereo headset, USB-C to 3.5-mm headphone jack adapter, protective case, SIM card removal tool, MiFavor UI 10.1, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR value (head): 1.597 W/kg, SAR value (body): 1.420 W/kg, DRM Widevine L1: yes, fanless
Gewicht
168 g, Voeding: 72 g
Prijs
550 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison Devices

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Drive
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
84 %
10-2020
ZTE Axon 11 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
168 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.47"2340x1080
84 %
08-2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080
83 %
07-2020
OnePlus Nord
SD 765G, Adreno 620
184 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.44"2440x1080
85 %
06-2020
LG Velvet
SD 765G, Adreno 620
180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.8"2460x1080
82 %
07-2020
Oppo Find X2 Lite
SD 765G, Adreno 620
180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"2400x1080
ZTE Axon 11 5G
ZTE Axon 11 5G
ZTE Axon 11 5G
ZTE Axon 11 5G
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
683 (656min - 691max) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
671 (652min - 683max) MBit/s ∼98% +2%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (632min - 679max) MBit/s ∼97%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
650 (563min - 668max) MBit/s ∼95% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼41% -57%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +41%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
620 (300min - 635max) MBit/s ∼93% +31%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
618 (310min - 644max) MBit/s ∼93% +30%
OnePlus Nord
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
563 (275min - 666max) MBit/s ∼84% +19%
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
475 (437min - 523max) MBit/s ∼71%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼40% -44%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø660 (632-679)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø475 (437-523)
Geolocation - ZTE Axon 11 5G
Geolocation - ZTE Axon 11 5G
Geolocation - ZTE Axon 11 5G
Geolocation - ZTE Axon 11 5G
Geolocation - ZTE Axon 11 5G
Geolocation - ZTE Axon 11 5G
Geolocation - Garmin Edge 500
Geolocation - Garmin Edge 500
Geolocation - Garmin Edge 500
Geolocation - Garmin Edge 500
Geolocation - Garmin Edge 500
Geolocation - Garmin Edge 500

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Main cameraWide-angle lens5X zoomLow-light photography
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
28.1 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
57.6 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
33 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
56.9 ∆E
57.7 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
57.5 ∆E
36 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
57.6 ∆E
46.4 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker ZTE Axon 11 5G: 40.04 ∆E min: 12.31 - max: 57.66 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
ColorChecker ZTE Axon 11 5G: 6.53 ∆E min: 1.86 - max: 13.32 ∆E
600
cd/m²
613
cd/m²
633
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
581
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 633 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 607.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.04 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 92 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 603 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6
Gamma: 2.21
ZTE Axon 11 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
OnePlus Nord
AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.44
LG Velvet
P-OLED, 2460x1080, 6.8
Oppo Find X2 Lite
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4
Screen
28%
13%
7%
-26%
Brightness middle
603
584
-3%
529
-12%
586
-3%
638
6%
Brightness
608
583
-4%
531
-13%
587
-3%
633
4%
Brightness Distribution
92
97
5%
94
2%
97
5%
95
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3
1.17
61%
2.53
16%
2.8
7%
5.6
-87%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.2
2.95
52%
4.52
27%
6.3
-2%
8.9
-44%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
1.7
55%
1.7
55%
2.3
39%
5.3
-39%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.231 99%
2.249 98%
2.01 109%
2.25 98%
CCT
7242 90%
6341 103%
6462 101%
6827 95%
7118 91%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 250 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 250 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 250 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17495 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
3.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 1.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2 (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1252 Points ∼61%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼63% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1242 Points ∼61% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1242 Points ∼61% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1242 - 1302, n=6)
1265 Points ∼62% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 5532, n=34)
2048 Points ∼100% +64%
Vulkan Score 5.2 (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1128 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼68% +5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1169 Points ∼67% +4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1187 Points ∼68% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1128 - 1265, n=6)
1180 Points ∼67% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 4789, n=36)
1750 Points ∼100% +55%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1816 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼97% +5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1966 Points ∼100% +8%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1797 Points ∼91% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1815 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=12)
1787 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=125)
1943 Points ∼99% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
588 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100% +14%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
611 Points ∼91% +4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
554 Points ∼82% -6%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
572 Points ∼85% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=12)
602 Points ∼89% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=125)
554 Points ∼82% -6%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7737 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼83% +1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9427 Points ∼100% +22%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7808 Points ∼83% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7754 Points ∼82% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7737 - 9989, n=12)
8355 Points ∼89% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=528)
5988 Points ∼64% -23%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
9168 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼80% -5%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
10876 Points ∼100% +19%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
9154 Points ∼84% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9756 Points ∼90% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8730 - 10876, n=12)
9679 Points ∼89% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=686)
6572 Points ∼60% -28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2609 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2867 Points ∼99% +10%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points ∼74% -18%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2757 Points ∼95% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=12)
2712 Points ∼94% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=179)
2668 Points ∼92% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3192 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3185 Points ∼100% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3193 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3177 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2364 - 3198, n=12)
3093 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9104, n=179)
3070 Points ∼96% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3041 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3108 Points ∼99% +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2877 Points ∼92% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3072 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2478 - 3130, n=12)
2988 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=179)
2734 Points ∼87% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3225 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼99% +8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3544 Points ∼100% +10%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1898 Points ∼54% -41%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3325 Points ∼94% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=12)
3247 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=531)
2236 Points ∼63% -31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3579 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3556 Points ∼99% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3547 Points ∼99% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3568 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2834 - 3589, n=12)
3489 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=531)
2174 Points ∼61% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3494 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3553 Points ∼99% +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2934 Points ∼81% -16%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3524 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=12)
3414 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=532)
2027 Points ∼56% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3238 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼98% +8%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3555 Points ∼100% +10%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1790 Points ∼50% -45%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3114 Points ∼88% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=12)
3225 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=563)
2153 Points ∼61% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5416 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼98% -1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5357 Points ∼99% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5437 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5356 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=12)
5214 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=563)
2928 Points ∼54% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4712 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4815 Points ∼98% +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3678 Points ∼75% -22%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4663 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=12)
4555 Points ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=563)
2457 Points ∼50% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3133 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼98% +9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3503 Points ∼100% +12%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3312 Points ∼95% +6%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼93% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3133 - 3547, n=12)
3334 Points ∼95% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=612)
2114 Points ∼60% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3302 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3284 Points ∼99% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3289 Points ∼99% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3302 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2106 - 3342, n=12)
3181 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9167, n=612)
1833 Points ∼55% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3263 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3330 Points ∼100% +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3278 Points ∼98% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼97% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2315 - 3346, n=12)
3199 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=613)
1743 Points ∼52% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3223 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼99% +7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3476 Points ∼100% +8%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1689 Points ∼49% -48%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3074 Points ∼88% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=12)
3196 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=655)
1985 Points ∼57% -38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5167 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼100% +13%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5171 Points ∼89% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5005 Points ∼86% -3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5136 Points ∼88% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=12)
4960 Points ∼85% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 13305, n=654)
2430 Points ∼42% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4556 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼100% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4665 Points ∼99% +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3576 Points ∼76% -22%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4478 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=12)
4347 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9611, n=657)
2083 Points ∼44% -54%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
14891 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼97% +37%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21016 Points ∼100% +41%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18769 Points ∼89% +26%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19521 Points ∼93% +31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=12)
20159 Points ∼96% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=799)
15611 Points ∼74% +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
68840 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69285 Points ∼100% +1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
68764 Points ∼99% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68456 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (60281 - 69645, n=12)
67892 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=797)
27419 Points ∼39% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38137 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼99% +19%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
45872 Points ∼100% +20%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43325 Points ∼94% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
43965 Points ∼96% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=12)
44075 Points ∼96% +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=797)
21279 Points ∼46% -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
93 fps ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼98% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
97 fps ∼100% +4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
96 fps ∼99% +3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼98% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=10)
90.1 fps ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=800)
46.1 fps ∼48% -50%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
59 fps ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼95% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
60 fps ∼95% +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼95% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60 fps ∼95% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (45 - 86, n=10)
63.2 fps ∼100% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=809)
31.6 fps ∼50% -46%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
56 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼88% -12%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
55 fps ∼98% -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼98% -2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
56 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=10)
51.6 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=705)
27.3 fps ∼49% -51%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
48 fps ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +15%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼91% +4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
47 fps ∼85% -2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
50 fps ∼91% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=10)
47.2 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=713)
22.8 fps ∼41% -52%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼100% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
37 fps ∼97% -3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
38 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=10)
35.8 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=568)
21.9 fps ∼58% -42%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼97% +3%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼100% +6%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps ∼94% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
34 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 34, n=10)
31.7 fps ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=570)
19.8 fps ∼58% -38%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼100% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼92% -8%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 13, n=12)
12.2 fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=324)
11.5 fps ∼88% -12%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.6 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼99% -1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼99% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.6 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=12)
8.59 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=322)
8.13 fps ∼95% -5%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20 fps ∼95% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 21, n=12)
20.2 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=328)
17.1 fps ∼81% -19%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼100% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
23 fps ∼96% -4%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
24 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 24, n=12)
22.7 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=327)
19.7 fps ∼82% -18%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼100% 0%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=10)
20 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=493)
14.7 fps ∼70% -30%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼95% 0%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼100% +6%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼95% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
18 fps ∼95% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 19, n=10)
17.9 fps ∼94% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=497)
13 fps ∼68% -28%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
316938 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼96% +1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
332074 Points ∼100% +5%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
308878 Points ∼93% -3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
323940 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (288970 - 332074, n=10)
315853 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=122)
322931 Points ∼97% +2%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1362 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% +7%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1441 Points ∼99% +6%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1226 Points ∼84% -10%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1196 Points ∼82% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1196 - 1462, n=10)
1375 Points ∼94% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=739)
828 Points ∼57% -39%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5247 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5203 Points ∼99% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5153 Points ∼98% -2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5172 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2560 - 5247, n=10)
4866 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=739)
2557 Points ∼49% -51%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5464 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100% +4%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5296 Points ∼93% -3%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4556 Points ∼80% -17%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5214 Points ∼92% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=10)
5129 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=739)
1910 Points ∼34% -65%
System (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6691 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼89% -9%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6801 Points ∼99% +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6430 Points ∼94% -4%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6856 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5960 - 6936, n=10)
6611 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=739)
3510 Points ∼51% -48%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Axon 11 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4020 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼100% +2%
OnePlus Nord
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4054 Points ∼99% +1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3674 Points ∼90% -9%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3856 Points ∼94% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3290 - 4094, n=10)
3872 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=739)
1797 Points ∼44% -55%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
58.665 Points ∼100% +23%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
50.998 Points ∼87% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.232 Points ∼86% +5%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
47.673 Points ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 58.7, n=9)
45.1 Points ∼77% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=197)
41 Points ∼70% -14%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
39.522 Points ∼67% -17%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
94.481 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼99% +5%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
89.305 Points ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 94.8, n=7)
75.1 Points ∼79% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=628)
47.8 Points ∼51% -46%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus Nord (Chome 84)
53.6 runs/min ∼100% +6%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
50.8 runs/min ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
50.7 runs/min ∼95% 0%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
49.8 runs/min ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=7)
45.4 runs/min ∼85% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=178)
43.1 runs/min ∼80% -15%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
101 Points ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼75% +7%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
76 Points ∼75% +7%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
72 Points ∼71% +1%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
71 Points ∼70%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=266)
69.9 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=10)
69.7 Points ∼69% -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
19143 Points ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼97% +2%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
18546 Points ∼97% +2%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
18219 Points ∼95%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
17890 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=10)
16097 Points ∼84% -12%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=797)
7984 Points ∼42% -56%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=823)
9690 ms * ∼100% -226%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2470 - 15230, n=10)
4156 ms * ∼43% -40%
ZTE Axon 11 5G (Chrome 83)
2973.3 ms * ∼31%
OnePlus Nord (Chrome 84)
2834.8 ms * ∼29% +5%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
2778 ms * ∼29% +7%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
2665.8 ms * ∼28% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼27% +12%

* ... kleiner is beter

ZTE Axon 11 5GXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GOnePlus NordLG VelvetOppo Find X2 LiteAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
-8%
-5%
6%
-19%
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
66.41 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.29 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
59 (8.4 - 72.4, n=34)
-11%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
88.31 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.77 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
74.4 (13.4 - 88.3, n=34)
-16%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
128.35
138.47
8%
104.5
-19%
135.87
6%
146.1
14%
112 (18.2 - 290, n=63)
-13%
37.1 (0.14 - 319, n=895)
-71%
Random Read 4KB
166.27
156.45
-6%
126.7
-24%
154.28
-7%
169.44
2%
144 (96.8 - 239, n=63)
-13%
60.3 (1.59 - 324, n=895)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
417.09
476.87
14%
473.1
13%
409.21
-2%
475.23
14%
243 (182 - 511, n=63)
-42%
131 (2.99 - 911, n=895)
-69%
Sequential Read 256KB
955.97
979.54
2%
955.5
0%
924.54
-3%
910.45
-5%
774 (427 - 999, n=63)
-19%
348 (12.1 - 1802, n=895)
-64%
0102030405060Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.8 (36-42)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø30 (29-31)
; Arena of Valor; min: Ø59.5 (59-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD: Ø59.5 (57-60)
Max. Belasting
 32.7 °C32.2 °C31.2 °C 
 32.7 °C31 °C31.9 °C 
 32.2 °C31.7 °C31.3 °C 
Maximum: 32.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 31.9 °C
29.1 °C30.1 °C31.9 °C
28.2 °C30.2 °C32.2 °C
28.4 °C30.1 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 32.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  33.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.935.5252928.23121.929.7402227.75029.932.9632230.58019.331.610016.332.41251438.216016.949.520014.952.425014.1583151063.44001165.550011.76963010.968.480011.971.310001175.2125010.276.9160011.477.7200012.878.6250012.980.6315012.582.440001379.3500013.182.4630013.480.6800015.776.91000013.576.3125001469.81600013.755.8SPL24.890.9N0.685median 13median 71.3Delta1.11047.242.43942.134.336.539.339.942.144.431.734.426.32626.427.125.631.622.143.919.353.218.958.716.562.71668.614.372.915.773.915.273.713.777.111.776.51274.512.470.311.171.911.269.711.86712.963.513.771.814.173.41475.81366.211.452.26863.425.984.922.415.80.864.6median 14median 69.72.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseZTE Axon 11 5GOnePlus Nord
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
ZTE Axon 11 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

OnePlus Nord audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.04 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.78 / 1.43 / 1.54 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.04 / 7.49 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
ZTE Axon 11 5G
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
LG Velvet
4300 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Lite
4025 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-43%
-33%
13%
-15%
-11%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.78
1.5
-92%
1.8
-131%
0.66
15%
0.75
4%
0.961 (0.66 - 1.8, n=11)
-23%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897)
-14%
Idle Average *
1.43
2.2
-54%
2.1
-47%
1.58
-10%
2.55
-78%
1.964 (0.82 - 2.55, n=11)
-37%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896)
-23%
Idle Maximum *
1.54
2.9
-88%
2.3
-49%
1.6
-4%
2.58
-68%
2.13 (0.85 - 2.9, n=11)
-38%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897)
-32%
Load Average *
5.04
4.4
13%
3.4
33%
3.3
35%
3.21
36%
3.96 (2.73 - 6.8, n=11)
21%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891)
18%
Load Maximum *
7.49
7.2
4%
5.2
31%
5.46
27%
5.29
29%
6.02 (4.4 - 7.5, n=11)
20%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891)
18%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
28h 20min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 50min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 00min
ZTE Axon 11 5G
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
OnePlus Nord
4115 mAh
LG Velvet
4300 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Lite
4025 mAh
Batterijduur
37%
14%
9%
7%
Reader / Idle
1700
1683
-1%
2003
18%
H.264
1070
1403
31%
1064
-1%
WiFi v1.3
679
884
30%
869
28%
741
9%
728
7%
Load
240
448
87%
261
9%

Pro

+ helder scherm
+ goede primaire camera
+ hoogwaardige behuizing

Contra

- Beeldscherm met PWM
- concurrenten bieden een betere levensduur van de batterij

Samenvatting - ZTE-specifiek ontwerp

ZTE Axon 11 5G testrapport. Apparaat geleverd door: ZTE Germany
ZTE Axon 11 5G testrapport. Apparaat geleverd door: ZTE Germany

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Met de Axon 11 5G zet ZTE voort wat het is begonnen met de Axon 11 (4G). De 5G-smartphone voelt premium, maar niet zwaar, in de hand. De bouwkwaliteit is op een goed niveau. Het touchscreen reageert snel op inputs en het systeem voelt erg pittig aan. 5G-ondersteuning betekent dat de ZTE-smartphone kan werken in de modernste mobiele netwerken.

De ZTE Axon 11 5G biedt wat elke 5G-smartphone uit het middensegment zou moeten bieden.

In vergelijking met de concurrentie zien de cameraprestaties van de ZTE Axon 11 5G er erg goed uit en zijn de systeemprestaties op een normaal niveau. Als het echter om de batterijduur gaat, doet de ZTE-smartphone het slechter dan de rest van de concurrentie. Maar dankzij QuickCharge 3.0 laadt de batterij behoorlijk snel op.

ZTE Axon 11 5G - 05-10-2020 v7
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
88%
Toetsenbord
66 / 75 → 88%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
51 / 70 → 73%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
87%
Gaming-performance
35 / 64 → 55%
Applicatie-performance
74 / 86 → 86%
Temperatuur
93%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
63%
Gemiddelde
78%
84%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport ZTE Axon 11 5G: Betaalbare 5G smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2020-10-17 (Update: 2020-10-17)