Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Redmi 6A Smartphone

Mike Wobker, 18-11-2018

Next-gen budget smartphone. De Xiaomi Redmi 6A is de opvolger van de betaalbare Redmi 5A en wordt voor dezelfde prijs verkocht terwijl de uitrusting aanzienlijk verbeterd is. In dit artikel evalueren we welke verbeteringen de koper van de €90 kostende smartphone kan verwachten en hoe het model zich houdt de concurrenten.

Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Redmi Serie)
Processor
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
Grafische kaart
PowerVR GE8320, Core: 650 MHz, PowerVR GE8320
Geheugen
2048 MB 
, 2GB of 3GB
Beeldscherm
5.45 inch 18:9, 1440 x 720 pixel 295 PPI, capacitief, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 16GB of 32GB, 25 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm audiopoort, Card Reader: microSD (tot 256 GB), Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: versnellingssensor, nabijheidssensor, kompas, microUSB
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (900, 1800), UMTS (B1, B8), LTE (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.3 x 147.5 x 71.5
Batterij
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.2
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 1 luidspreker, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, USB lader, microUSB kabel, SIM tool, MIUI 9.6.2, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR waarde (head): 0.78 W/kg, SAR waarde (body): 1.17 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
145 g, Voeding: 55 g
Prijs
150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
Xiaomi Redmi 6A

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=311)
212 MBit/s ∼100% +256%
Nokia 3.1
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash
112 MBit/s ∼53% +88%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 MBit/s ∼46% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
59.6 (min: 56, max: 61) MBit/s ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.1 MBit/s ∼22% -21%
LG K11
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.1 MBit/s ∼22% -23%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=311)
206 MBit/s ∼100% +270%
Nokia 3.1
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750N, 16 GB eMMC Flash
100 MBit/s ∼49% +80%
Gigaset GS100
PowerVR GE8100, MT6739, 8 GB eMMC Flash
99.6 MBit/s ∼48% +79%
LG K11
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 16 GB eMMC Flash
58.6 MBit/s ∼28% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
PowerVR GE8320, Helio A22 MT6762M, 32 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 (min: 52, max: 59) MBit/s ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
49 MBit/s ∼24% -12%
010203040506070Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø58.8 (56-61)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø55.9 (52-59)
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 6A
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520
GPS Garmin Edge 520

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Xiaomi Redmi 6A - testkaart
Xiaomi Redmi 6A - testkaart (detail)
368
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
443
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
404
cd/m²
434
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
429
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 443 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 400.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 82 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 404 cd/m²
Contrast: 1554:1 (Zwart: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.28 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
93.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.213
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
IPS, 1440x720, 5.45
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS100
IPS, 1440x720, 5.5
Nokia 3.1
IPS, 1440x720, 5.2
LG K11
IPS, 1280x720, 5.3
Screen
-38%
-47%
-9%
-66%
Brightness middle
404
503
25%
442
9%
506
25%
394
-2%
Brightness
400
499
25%
446
12%
490
23%
385
-4%
Brightness Distribution
82
84
2%
86
5%
93
13%
93
13%
Black Level *
0.26
0.73
-181%
0.35
-35%
0.24
8%
0.66
-154%
Contrast
1554
689
-56%
1263
-19%
2108
36%
597
-62%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.28
5.44
-27%
8.03
-88%
6.4
-50%
8.2
-92%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.97
10.01
-0%
15.81
-59%
11.1
-11%
21.5
-116%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
6.8
-94%
10.4
-197%
7.5
-114%
7.5
-114%
Gamma
2.213 99%
2.451 90%
2.02 109%
2.2 100%
2.6 85%
CCT
6899 94%
6590 99%
10070 65%
8643 75%
7581 86%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8929 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
24 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 15 ms stijging
↘ 9 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
34 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 17 ms stijging
↘ 17 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1699 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1333 Points ∼30% -22%
Nokia 3.1
1908 Points ∼42% +12%
LG K11
1559 Points ∼35% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
1699 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (836 - 21070, n=198)
4508 Points ∼100% +165%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2471 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1874 Points ∼44% -24%
Gigaset GS100
1418 Points ∼33% -43%
Nokia 3.1
2645 Points ∼62% +7%
LG K11
2259 Points ∼53% -9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
2471 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 11598, n=248)
4298 Points ∼100% +74%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
825 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
681 Points ∼54% -17%
Gigaset GS100
579 Points ∼46% -30%
Nokia 3.1
665 Points ∼52% -19%
LG K11
609 Points ∼48% -26%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
825 Points ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (394 - 4824, n=249)
1267 Points ∼100% +54%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6194 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
4559 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 3.1
3885 Points ∼63% -37%
LG K11
4241 Points ∼68% -32%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
6194 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4058 - 13531, n=424)
4956 Points ∼80% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
763 Points ∼45%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
611 Points ∼36% -20%
Nokia 3.1
1031 Points ∼60% +35%
LG K11
1121 Points ∼66% +47%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
763 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2293 - 4439, n=277)
1709 Points ∼100% +124%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
260 Points ∼18%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
75 Points ∼5% -71%
Nokia 3.1
266 Points ∼18% +2%
LG K11
248 Points ∼17% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
260 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (869 - 8206, n=277)
1465 Points ∼100% +463%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
305 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
93 Points ∼7% -70%
Nokia 3.1
319 Points ∼23% +5%
LG K11
300 Points ∼22% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
305 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1010 - 5189, n=280)
1360 Points ∼100% +346%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
807 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
886 Points ∼53% +10%
Gigaset GS100
611 Points ∼36% -24%
Nokia 3.1
1013 Points ∼60% +26%
LG K11
1207 Points ∼72% +50%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
807 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=293)
1686 Points ∼100% +109%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
445 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
249 Points ∼12% -44%
Gigaset GS100
131 Points ∼6% -71%
Nokia 3.1
397 Points ∼19% -11%
LG K11
384 Points ∼19% -14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
445 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=293)
2062 Points ∼100% +363%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
494 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
296 Points ∼17% -40%
Gigaset GS100
159 Points ∼9% -68%
Nokia 3.1
459 Points ∼27% -7%
LG K11
453 Points ∼26% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
494 Points ∼29% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=294)
1729 Points ∼100% +250%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
828 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
549 Points ∼33% -34%
Nokia 3.1
1144 Points ∼70% +38%
LG K11
1233 Points ∼75% +49%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
828 Points ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2281 - 4216, n=352)
1642 Points ∼100% +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
225 Points ∼19%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
69 Points ∼6% -69%
Nokia 3.1
150 Points ∼13% -33%
LG K11
252 Points ∼21% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
225 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (815 - 5241, n=352)
1186 Points ∼100% +427%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
268 Points ∼24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
Points ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS100
86 Points ∼8% -68%
Nokia 3.1
186 Points ∼16% -31%
LG K11
306 Points ∼27% +14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
268 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (951 - 4734, n=360)
1134 Points ∼100% +323%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
840 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
903 Points ∼59% +8%
Gigaset GS100
532 Points ∼35% -37%
Nokia 3.1
1099 Points ∼71% +31%
LG K11
1127 Points ∼73% +34%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
840 Points ∼55% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (532 - 4215, n=385)
1538 Points ∼100% +83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
403 Points ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43 Points ∼3% -89%
Gigaset GS100
104 Points ∼6% -74%
Nokia 3.1
103 Points ∼6% -74%
LG K11
381 Points ∼23% -5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
403 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (46 - 8312, n=385)
1627 Points ∼100% +304%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
456 Points ∼33%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
55 Points ∼4% -88%
Gigaset GS100
127 Points ∼9% -72%
Nokia 3.1
129 Points ∼9% -72%
LG K11
447 Points ∼32% -2%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
456 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (58 - 6454, n=393)
1384 Points ∼100% +204%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
14128 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
10556 Points ∼75% -25%
Gigaset GS100
9159 Points ∼65% -35%
Nokia 3.1
10044 Points ∼71% -29%
LG K11
10285 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
14128 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=540)
12875 Points ∼91% -9%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6785 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
5532 Points ∼31% -18%
Gigaset GS100
2878 Points ∼16% -58%
Nokia 3.1
8163 Points ∼45% +20%
LG K11
8177 Points ∼46% +21%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
6785 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2465 - 162695, n=540)
17971 Points ∼100% +165%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
7671 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6186 Points ∼41% -19%
Gigaset GS100
3395 Points ∼22% -56%
Nokia 3.1
8517 Points ∼56% +11%
LG K11
8567 Points ∼57% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
7671 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=541)
15098 Points ∼100% +97%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
13 fps ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
7.7 fps ∼25% -41%
Gigaset GS100
5 fps ∼16% -62%
Nokia 3.1
13 fps ∼42% 0%
LG K11
13 fps ∼42% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
13 fps ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=565)
31.3 fps ∼100% +141%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
19 fps ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
14 fps ∼56% -26%
Gigaset GS100
8.2 fps ∼33% -57%
Nokia 3.1
20 fps ∼80% +5%
LG K11
22 fps ∼88% +16%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
19 fps ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=568)
24.9 fps ∼100% +31%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
6.3 fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
2.8 fps ∼17% -56%
Nokia 3.1
5.5 fps ∼33% -13%
LG K11
5.3 fps ∼32% -16%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
6.3 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=487)
16.8 fps ∼100% +167%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
12 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
6 fps ∼38% -50%
Gigaset GS100
4.4 fps ∼28% -63%
Nokia 3.1
10 fps ∼63% -17%
LG K11
11 fps ∼69% -8%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
12 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=490)
16 fps ∼100% +33%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
4 fps ∼28%
Gigaset GS100
1.3 fps ∼9% -67%
Nokia 3.1
3.6 fps ∼25% -10%
LG K11
3.5 fps ∼24% -12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
4 fps ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 88, n=349)
14.3 fps ∼100% +258%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
7.5 fps ∼54%
Gigaset GS100
2.8 fps ∼20% -63%
Nokia 3.1
7.8 fps ∼56% +4%
LG K11
8.6 fps ∼62% +15%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
7.5 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.8 - 110, n=352)
13.9 fps ∼100% +85%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2.7 fps ∼26%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
2.7 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 59, n=62)
10.2 fps ∼100% +278%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
0.85 fps ∼13%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
0.85 fps ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 31, n=62)
6.49 fps ∼100% +664%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
4.3 fps ∼30%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
4.3 fps ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5.7 - 59, n=62)
14.4 fps ∼100% +235%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
2.3 (min: 4.3) fps ∼15%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
2.3 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 63, n=61)
15.7 fps ∼100% +583%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1.9 fps ∼19%
Nokia 3.1
2 fps ∼20% +5%
LG K11
1.9 fps ∼19% 0%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
1.9 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.3 - 54, n=280)
9.86 fps ∼100% +419%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3.2 fps ∼36%
Nokia 3.1
4.1 fps ∼46% +28%
LG K11
4.3 fps ∼48% +34%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
3.2 fps ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6 - 58, n=283)
8.89 fps ∼100% +178%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
61753 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
43861 Points ∼37% -29%
LG K11
Points ∼0% -100%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
61753 Points ∼52% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (17073 - 348178, n=171)
117893 Points ∼100% +91%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
51633 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
36883 Points ∼48% -29%
Gigaset GS100
30702 Points ∼40% -41%
Nokia 3.1
43987 Points ∼57% -15%
LG K11
39898 Points ∼52% -23%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
51633 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 254229, n=394)
76519 Points ∼100% +48%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
733 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
723 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigaset GS100
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Nokia 3.1
671 Points ∼92% -8%
LG K11
679 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
733 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=500)
697 Points ∼95% -5%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
482 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
444 Points ∼26% -8%
Gigaset GS100
149 Points ∼9% -69%
Nokia 3.1
499 Points ∼29% +4%
LG K11
487 Points ∼28% +1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
482 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=500)
1735 Points ∼100% +260%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
607 Points ∼49%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
762 Points ∼61% +26%
Gigaset GS100
431 Points ∼35% -29%
Nokia 3.1
1033 Points ∼83% +70%
LG K11
728 Points ∼59% +20%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
607 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=500)
1243 Points ∼100% +105%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
1434 Points ∼57%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
1463 Points ∼58% +2%
Gigaset GS100
1115 Points ∼44% -22%
Nokia 3.1
2097 Points ∼84% +46%
LG K11
1599 Points ∼64% +12%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
1434 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=500)
2509 Points ∼100% +75%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
745 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
774 Points ∼62% +4%
Gigaset GS100
162 Points ∼13% -78%
Nokia 3.1
923 Points ∼74% +24%
LG K11
787 Points ∼63% +6%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
745 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=504)
1253 Points ∼100% +68%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
93 Points ∼13%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
93 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (36.3 - 2754, n=76)
693 Points ∼100% +645%

Legende

 
Xiaomi Redmi 6A Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 5A Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS100 Mediatek MT6739, PowerVR GE8100, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 3.1 Mediatek MT6750N, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K11 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=423)
36.7 Points ∼100% +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
23.546 Points ∼64%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
23.5 Points ∼64% 0%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
18.015 Points ∼49% -23%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
17.927 Points ∼49% -24%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
16.634 Points ∼45% -29%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
13.378 Points ∼36% -43%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=559)
5558 Points ∼100% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
4332 Points ∼78%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
4332 Points ∼78% 0%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
3397 Points ∼61% -22%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
3274 Points ∼59% -24%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
3224 Points ∼58% -26%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
2093 Points ∼38% -52%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
15962 ms * ∼100% -49%
LG K11 (Chrome 67)
14149.5 ms * ∼89% -32%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
14115.5 ms * ∼88% -31%
Xiaomi Redmi 5A (Chrome 67)
13112.2 ms * ∼82% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=579)
11477 ms * ∼72% -7%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
10740 ms * ∼67% -0%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
10739.7 ms * ∼67%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (25 - 161, n=63)
63.6 Points ∼100% +112%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
30 Points ∼47%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
30 Points ∼47% 0%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Average of class Smartphone (91 - 362, n=284)
111 Points ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Redmi 6A (Chrome 70)
88 Points ∼79%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
88 Points ∼79% 0%
Nokia 3.1 (Chrome 67)
78 Points ∼70% -11%
Gigaset GS100 (Chrome 68)
52 Points ∼47% -41%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Redmi 6AXiaomi Redmi 5AGigaset GS100Nokia 3.1LG K11Average 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-49%
-21%
-20%
-25%
-28%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
65.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
61 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
59.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-9%
61.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
47.3 (3.4 - 87.1, n=113)
-28%
45.8 (3.4 - 87.1, n=323)
-30%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
79.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
77.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-7%
82.81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
66.4 (8.2 - 96.5, n=113)
-20%
64 (8.2 - 96.5, n=323)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
52.23
9.28
-82%
6.2
-88%
9.2
-82%
13.16
-75%
18.9 (0.75 - 77.3, n=151)
-64%
16.1 (0.14 - 164, n=608)
-69%
Random Read 4KB
33.94
42.32
25%
17.6
-48%
48.62
43%
45.8
35%
36.3 (3.59 - 117, n=151)
7%
38.3 (1.59 - 173, n=608)
13%
Sequential Write 256KB
131.67
49.86
-62%
24
-82%
35.26
-73%
48.32
-63%
95 (14.8 - 189, n=151)
-28%
79.8 (2.99 - 246, n=608)
-39%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.54
293.76
6%
97.2
-65%
281.54
1%
252.96
-9%
230 (25.8 - 440, n=151)
-17%
230 (12.1 - 895, n=608)
-17%
Max. Belasting
 31.5 °C30 °C31 °C 
 31 °C29.6 °C31.4 °C 
 30.4 °C30.1 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 31.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.6 °C
29.3 °C31.1 °C32.3 °C
29.4 °C30.7 °C32 °C
29.7 °C31 °C32 °C
Maximum: 32.3 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  39.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.7 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 34.2 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.945.52536.544.93137.239.14037.641.25031.7356323.823.78024.425.110023.625.112519.922.716023.32420018.430.725018.238.231515.845.140014.653.450015.557.26301361.580012.364.7100012.166.1125011.965.8160010.768.2200010.768.1250010.566.6315010.366.8400010.767.2500010.565.5630010.565800010.663.21000010.662.51250010.553.71600010.641.4SPL61.552.561.424.177.8N14.68.214.50.639.8median 11.9median 62.5Delta3.412.12727.825.927.629.532.231.428.732.634.224.123.223.122.724.123.117.21916.623.616.833.216.438.714.147.513.85713.662.712.163.311.564.211.566.911.265.511.263.511.264.711.26511.166.211.266.111.266.711.465.211.466.811.360.811.450.311.441.86023.977.113.70.539.7median 11.4median 63.31.811.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 6AXiaomi Redmi 5A
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 6A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Redmi 5A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.2 / 2 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.4 / 4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Nokia 3.1
2990 mAh
LG K11
3000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6762M
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-18%
-54%
-8%
-14%
0%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.2
-71%
1.3
-86%
0.68
3%
0.57
19%
0.7
-0%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=642)
-26%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.5
-25%
2.1
-75%
1.33
-11%
1.48
-23%
1.2
-0%
1.721 (0.6 - 6.2, n=641)
-43%
Idle Maximum *
2
1.8
10%
2.9
-45%
1.37
31%
1.54
23%
2
-0%
1.998 (0.74 - 6.6, n=642)
-0%
Load Average *
3.4
2.9
15%
4.4
-29%
4.02
-18%
4.56
-34%
3.4
-0%
4.04 (0.8 - 10.8, n=636)
-19%
Load Maximum *
4
4.8
-20%
5.3
-33%
5.89
-47%
6.16
-54%
4
-0%
5.76 (1.2 - 14.2, n=636)
-44%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 41min
Xiaomi Redmi 6A
3000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 5A
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS100
3000 mAh
Nokia 3.1
2990 mAh
LG K11
3000 mAh
Batterijduur
WiFi v1.3
761
1009
33%
532
-30%
562
-26%
741
-3%

Pro

+ goede systeemprestaties
+ betaalbaar
+ robuuste behuizing
+ dual SIM en microSD kunnen tegelijkertijd gebruikt worden

Contra

- geen NFC
- strenge online vereisten
Getest: Xiaomi Redmi 6A. Testmodel geleverd door notebooksbilliger.de
Getest: Xiaomi Redmi 6A. Testmodel geleverd door notebooksbilliger.de

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Xiaomi Redmi 6A is de smartphone die de Redmi 5A had moeten zijn. De prestaties zijn aanzienlijk verbeterd, zodat eenvoudige toepassingen, browsertaken en het systeem soepel kunnen worden uitgevoerd. De camera is geschikt voor eenvoudige snapshots en gebruikers die op zoek zijn naar een betaalbare tweede telefoon, hoeven niet te leven zonder de dual-SIM-functie, zelfs als ze een micro SD-kaart gebruiken.

Alleen Xiaomi beschikt over een betaalbare telefoon als de Redmi 6A.

Hoewel je nauwelijks je eisen hoeft te verlagen wat betreft systeemprestaties, mist de Redmi 6A enige functies. Vanwege de lage prijs is er bijvoorbeeld geen vingerafdruksensor en moeten gebruikers het ook zonder NFC doen. Kopers moeten zich ook bewust zijn van de strikte online-verbindingsvereisten van Xiaomi. Zonder een gebruikersaccount kunt u bijvoorbeeld bepaalde instellingen niet aanpassen.

Xiaomi Redmi 6A - 16-11-2018 v6
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
77%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 86%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
35 / 60 → 58%
Gewicht
93%
Batterij
96%
Beeldscherm
85%
Gaming-performance
16 / 63 → 25%
Applicatie-performance
46 / 70 → 65%
Temperatuur
93%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
66 / 91 → 73%
Camera
63%
Gemiddelde
70%
81%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Redmi 6A Smartphone
Mike Wobker, 2018-11-18 (Update: 2018-11-18)