Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Smartphone

Florian Wimmer, 03-06-2018

Veel scherm voor weinig geld. De Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus biedt een groot beeldscherm en middenklasse prestaties voor minder dan € 200. Dit klinkt als een goede koop, maar laten we uitgebreider kijken in ons testrapport!

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Redmi Serie)
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.99 inch 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55.9 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 audio poort, Card Reader: microSD max. 128 GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: acceleratiesensor, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas, FM radio, USB OTG, WiFi Direct
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (Band 1,3,5,7,8,20,34,38,39,40,41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.1 x 158.5 x 75.5
Batterij
15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Quick Charge
Besturingssysteem
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/​2.2, phase comparison AF, dual-LED flits, videos @2160p/​30fp
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix LED flits, videos @1080p/​30fps
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono luidspreker aan de onderzijde, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, oplader, USB-kabel, SIM tool, Security, Mi Drop, Mi Video, Mi Remote Control, 24 Maanden Garantie, VoLTE, LTE Cat.6 (300 MBit/s download, 50 MBite/s upload), SAR values: 1.01 W/kg (hoofd), 1.47 W/kg (lichaam), fanless
Gewicht
180 g, Voeding: 59 g
Prijs
199 Euro

 

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus

Größenvergleich

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 939, n=216)
198 MBit/s ∼100% +267%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
108 MBit/s ∼55% +100%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
106 MBit/s ∼54% +97%
Maze Alpha X
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
82.8 MBit/s ∼42% +54%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
53.9 MBit/s ∼27%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 MBit/s ∼27% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=216)
191 MBit/s ∼100% +243%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
102 MBit/s ∼53% +83%
Ulefone Power 3
Mali-G71 MP2, Helio P23 MT6763T, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 MBit/s ∼52% +78%
Maze Alpha X
Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P25, 64 GB eMMC Flash
95.1 MBit/s ∼50% +71%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
Adreno 506, 625, 64 GB eMMC Flash
55.7 MBit/s ∼29%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼26% -10%
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – overview, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – overview, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – gardens, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – gardens, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – bridge, second attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – bridge, second attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – gardens, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge, third attempt
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – overview, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – overview, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – garden, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – garden, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – bridge, third attempt
GPS Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus – bridge, third attempt

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
622
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
621
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 622 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 612.1 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 96 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 613 cd/m²
Contrast: 1088:1 (Zwart: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
99.6% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.073
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Maze Alpha X
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Ulefone Power 3
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Honor 9 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Gigaset GS370 Plus
IPS, 1440x720, 5.7
Screen
-93%
-4%
1%
-52%
Brightness middle
620
497
-20%
494
-20%
627
1%
472
-24%
Brightness
612
478
-22%
485
-21%
622
2%
468
-24%
Brightness Distribution
96
87
-9%
87
-9%
82
-15%
92
-4%
Black Level *
0.57
0.6
-5%
0.33
42%
0.41
28%
0.73
-28%
Contrast
1088
828
-24%
1497
38%
1529
41%
647
-41%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.46
11.6
-235%
5.1
-47%
4.5
-30%
6.8
-97%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.88
22.1
-180%
9.9
-26%
7
11%
14.5
-84%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.9
13.5
-246%
3.5
10%
5.1
-31%
8.2
-110%
Gamma
2.073 116%
2.93 82%
2.16 111%
2.26 106%
2.13 113%
CCT
7230 90%
9955 65%
7253 90%
7201 90%
7924 82%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 10750 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
13 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ ms stijging
↘ ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (26.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
11.5 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ ms stijging
↘ ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
60490 Points ∼85%
Maze Alpha X
63989 Points ∼90% +6%
Ulefone Power 3
54201 Points ∼76% -10%
Honor 9 Lite
67727 Points ∼96% +12%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
42909 Points ∼61% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (59867 - 66045, n=14)
62972 Points ∼89% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=314)
70902 Points ∼100% +17%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
76178 Points ∼67%
Maze Alpha X
73822 Points ∼65% -3%
Ulefone Power 3
54192 Points ∼48% -29%
Honor 9 Lite
89639 Points ∼79% +18%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
55925 Points ∼50% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (76178 - 81789, n=4)
78413 Points ∼69% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (21088 - 266981, n=84)
112962 Points ∼100% +48%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4905 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
3795 Points ∼77% -23%
Ulefone Power 3
4770 Points ∼97% -3%
Honor 9 Lite
4911 Points ∼100% 0%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
3394 Points ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4626 - 5558, n=11)
4905 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3159 - 8601, n=174)
4524 Points ∼92% -8%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
5801 Points ∼91%
Maze Alpha X
4562 Points ∼72% -21%
Ulefone Power 3
6344 Points ∼100% +9%
Honor 9 Lite
5887 Points ∼93% +1%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
4411 Points ∼70% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (4596 - 7846, n=13)
5891 Points ∼93% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 10264, n=337)
4698 Points ∼74% -19%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
722 Points ∼78%
Maze Alpha X
924 Points ∼100% +28%
Ulefone Power 3
829 Points ∼90% +15%
Honor 9 Lite
888 Points ∼96% +23%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
697 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (649 - 895, n=14)
753 Points ∼81% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=412)
674 Points ∼73% -7%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1017 Points ∼67%
Maze Alpha X
1122 Points ∼74% +10%
Ulefone Power 3
855 Points ∼56% -16%
Honor 9 Lite
859 Points ∼56% -16%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
645 Points ∼42% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (968 - 1026, n=14)
1008 Points ∼66% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=412)
1525 Points ∼100% +50%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
961 Points ∼55%
Maze Alpha X
1294 Points ∼74% +35%
Ulefone Power 3
1566 Points ∼89% +63%
Honor 9 Lite
1757 Points ∼100% +83%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
799 Points ∼45% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (584 - 1553, n=14)
1022 Points ∼58% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=412)
1114 Points ∼63% +16%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3236 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
3064 Points ∼95% -5%
Ulefone Power 3
2906 Points ∼90% -10%
Honor 9 Lite
3058 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
1882 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1960 - 3261, n=14)
2765 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=412)
2213 Points ∼68% -32%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
1229 Points ∼86%
Maze Alpha X
1424 Points ∼100% +16%
Ulefone Power 3
1340 Points ∼94% +9%
Honor 9 Lite
1423 Points ∼100% +16%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
906 Points ∼64% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1019 - 1323, n=14)
1197 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=416)
1129 Points ∼79% -8%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3316 Points ∼83%
Maze Alpha X
2726 Points ∼69% -18%
Honor 9 Lite
3117 Points ∼78% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (2628 - 3678, n=7)
3162 Points ∼80% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (773 - 14362, n=111)
3973 Points ∼100% +20%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4292 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
3795 Points ∼88% -12%
Honor 9 Lite
3730 Points ∼87% -13%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
2624 Points ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3148 - 4396, n=9)
4104 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=156)
4089 Points ∼95% -5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
870 Points ∼71%
Maze Alpha X
833 Points ∼68% -4%
Honor 9 Lite
945 Points ∼77% +9%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
618 Points ∼51% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (841 - 881, n=10)
778 Points ∼64% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=157)
1222 Points ∼100% +40%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2038 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
1700 Points ∼83% -17%
Ulefone Power 3
1240 Points ∼61% -39%
Honor 9 Lite
1748 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
1129 Points ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1636 - 2177, n=14)
1930 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (531 - 3669, n=264)
1555 Points ∼76% -24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
379 Points ∼35%
Maze Alpha X
598 Points ∼55% +58%
Ulefone Power 3
54 Points ∼5% -86%
Honor 9 Lite
253 Points ∼23% -33%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
325 Points ∼30% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (372 - 391, n=14)
382 Points ∼35% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=264)
1085 Points ∼100% +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
463 Points ∼45%
Maze Alpha X
699 Points ∼68% +51%
Ulefone Power 3
69 Points ∼7% -85%
Honor 9 Lite
312 Points ∼30% -33%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
386 Points ∼37% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (452 - 473, n=14)
464 Points ∼45% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=272)
1034 Points ∼100% +123%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
2058 Points ∼100%
Maze Alpha X
1725 Points ∼84% -16%
Ulefone Power 3
1237 Points ∼60% -40%
Honor 9 Lite
1788 Points ∼87% -13%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
1116 Points ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (1631 - 2157, n=14)
1939 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (537 - 3642, n=293)
1449 Points ∼70% -30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
732 Points ∼50%
Maze Alpha X
928 Points ∼64% +27%
Ulefone Power 3
57 Points ∼4% -92%
Honor 9 Lite
184 Points ∼13% -75%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
480 Points ∼33% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (390 - 743, n=14)
702 Points ∼48% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=293)
1452 Points ∼100% +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
854 Points ∼69%
Maze Alpha X
1034 Points ∼83% +21%
Ulefone Power 3
72 Points ∼6% -92%
Honor 9 Lite
230 Points ∼19% -73%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
550 Points ∼44% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (476 - 870, n=14)
816 Points ∼66% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=301)
1243 Points ∼100% +46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
15593 Points ∼98%
Maze Alpha X
15189 Points ∼96% -3%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
14780 Points ∼93% -5%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
10201 Points ∼64% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (15462 - 16267, n=13)
15831 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=446)
12118 Points ∼77% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13219 Points ∼85%
Maze Alpha X
13708 Points ∼88% +4%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
11712 Points ∼75% -11%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
9094 Points ∼58% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (12930 - 13491, n=13)
13299 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=446)
15620 Points ∼100% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
13682 Points ∼98%
Maze Alpha X
14012 Points ∼100% +2%
Ulefone Power 3
Points ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
12278 Points ∼88% -10%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
9968 Points ∼71% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (13439 - 14003, n=13)
13789 Points ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=447)
13464 Points ∼96% -2%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
23 fps ∼85%
Maze Alpha X
24 fps ∼89% +4%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
19 fps ∼70% -17%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
17 fps ∼63% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (22 - 23, n=14)
22.9 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=473)
27 fps ∼100% +17%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
17 fps ∼68%
Maze Alpha X
21 fps ∼84% +24%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
18 fps ∼72% +6%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
25 fps ∼100% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (17 - 24, n=14)
21.3 fps ∼85% +25%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=476)
23.4 fps ∼94% +38%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.9 fps ∼69%
Maze Alpha X
11 fps ∼76% +11%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
8.6 fps ∼60% -13%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
7 fps ∼49% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 10, n=14)
9.34 fps ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=398)
14.4 fps ∼100% +45%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
9.4 fps ∼65%
Maze Alpha X
9.5 fps ∼66% +1%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼58% -11%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
13 fps ∼90% +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (7.4 - 10, n=14)
9.58 fps ∼66% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=400)
14.5 fps ∼100% +54%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.5 fps ∼51%
Maze Alpha X
3.7 fps ∼29% -43%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼25% -51%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
4.6 fps ∼36% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.5 - 7, n=14)
6.17 fps ∼49% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=263)
12.7 fps ∼100% +95%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
6.2 fps ∼49%
Maze Alpha X
6 fps ∼47% -3%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
5 fps ∼39% -19%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
10 fps ∼79% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 6.9, n=14)
6.02 fps ∼47% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (3.3 - 110, n=265)
12.7 fps ∼100% +105%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.5 fps ∼40%
Maze Alpha X
4.1 fps ∼47% +17%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼36% -9%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
2.4 fps ∼27% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.4 - 3.8, n=13)
3.51 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.9 - 35, n=195)
8.8 fps ∼100% +151%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
3.4 fps ∼43%
Maze Alpha X
3.6 fps ∼46% +6%
Ulefone Power 3
fps ∼0% -100%
Honor 9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼37% -15%
Gigaset GS370 Plus
4.9 fps ∼62% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3.1 - 3.8, n=13)
3.48 fps ∼44% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 50, n=198)
7.91 fps ∼100% +133%

Legende

 
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Maze Alpha X Mediatek Helio P25, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Ulefone Power 3 Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763T, ARM Mali-G71 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS370 Plus Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=331)
34.6 Points ∼100% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (23.1 - 31.8, n=14)
27.8 Points ∼80% +20%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
27.463 Points ∼79% +19%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
26.42 Points ∼76% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
23.097 Points ∼67%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
22.91 Points ∼66% -1%
Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63)
19.949 Points ∼58% -14%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=467)
5018 Points ∼100% +13%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
4990 Points ∼99% +13%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
4742 Points ∼94% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (3804 - 4979, n=14)
4542 Points ∼91% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
4424 Points ∼88%
Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63)
3310 Points ∼66% -25%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
3155 Points ∼63% -29%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
23714.1 ms * ∼100% -118%
Gigaset GS370 Plus (Chrome 63)
12469.7 ms * ∼53% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=486)
11866 ms * ∼50% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
10895 ms * ∼46%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
10250.4 ms * ∼43% +6%
Maze Alpha X (Chrome Version 64)
10244 ms * ∼43% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (8028 - 10895, n=14)
8986 ms * ∼38% +18%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66)
112 Points ∼100%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
108 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=232)
98.1 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (60 - 112, n=9)
85.1 Points ∼76% -24%
Ulefone Power 3 (Standardbrowser 7.1.1)
43 Points ∼38% -62%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Redmi 5 PlusMaze Alpha XUlefone Power 3Honor 9 LiteGigaset GS370 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
36%
136%
15%
5%
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.46
73.99 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24%
71.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
56.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
50.9 (19.6 - 74.7, n=44)
-14%
42.6 (20.8 - 87.1, n=247)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.38
80.96 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
81.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
76.52 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
69.2 (21.1 - 86.9, n=44)
-18%
60.9 (36.5 - 96.5, n=247)
-28%
Random Write 4KB
7.1
11.61
64%
21.25
199%
66.83
841%
17.1
141%
15.9 (3.4 - 71.1, n=51)
124%
13.2 (0.14 - 164, n=519)
86%
Random Read 4KB
79.5
70.27
-12%
61.38
-23%
68.39
-14%
48.4
-39%
47.7 (11.4 - 149, n=51)
-40%
33.7 (1.59 - 173, n=519)
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB
194.5
162.16
-17%
214.88
10%
138.21
-29%
182.4
-6%
157 (40 - 216, n=51)
-19%
69.1 (2.99 - 216, n=519)
-64%
Sequential Read 256KB
270
247.44
-8%
294.58
9%
269.56
0%
284.9
6%
267 (115 - 704, n=51)
-1%
208 (12.1 - 832, n=519)
-23%
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min31 fps
 high HD31 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 InstellingenWaarde
 high53 fps
 minimal54 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 36.6 °C34.7 °C35.8 °C 
 36.3 °C35 °C35.7 °C 
 35.9 °C35.3 °C35.2 °C 
Maximum: 36.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.6 °C
34.1 °C35 °C36.2 °C
35 °C35.1 °C35.8 °C
35 °C35.5 °C35.5 °C
Maximum: 36.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  35.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.332.42538.2353134.145.54034.934.35043.336.96328.627.98025.825.510024.224.31252130.51602141.520020.150.125019.955.831518.260.440017.964.550017.667.963016.472.980016.572.7100015.875.3125015.474.7160015.174.1200015.273.8250015.274.6315015.177.7400015.176500015.178.2630015.176.4800015.2711000015.267.31250015.360.71600015.144.4SPL27.986.9N170median 15.4Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plusmedian 71Delta1.810.635.238.332.938.737.231.131.732.939.636.328.330.627.327.126.930.326.729.12435.220.939.920.943.519.548.618.556.917.560.417.563.315.765.415.87016.671.815.873.215.470.715.571.11672.515.878167916.375.216.375.216.277.716.468.716.458.328.686.11.162.4median 16.4Honor 9 Litemedian 68.72.112.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.7 / 2.8 / 3.4 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.2 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Maze Alpha X
3900 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS370 Plus
3000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
11%
31%
21%
24%
18%
18%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.9
-29%
0.79
-13%
0.85
-21%
0.77
-10%
0.884 (0.49 - 2.2, n=14)
-26%
0.854 (0.2 - 3.4, n=549)
-22%
Idle Average *
2.8
2.14
24%
1.82
35%
2
29%
1.58
44%
1.96 (0.87 - 3.92, n=14)
30%
1.69 (0.6 - 6.2, n=548)
40%
Idle Maximum *
3.4
2.18
36%
1.87
45%
2.04
40%
1.73
49%
2.1 (0.9 - 4.03, n=14)
38%
1.922 (0.74 - 6.6, n=549)
43%
Load Average *
4.2
3.96
6%
2.7
36%
3.23
23%
3.59
15%
3.38 (1.69 - 6.2, n=14)
20%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=543)
6%
Load Maximum *
7.2
5.81
19%
3.62
50%
4.93
32%
5.69
21%
5.26 (3.8 - 7.2, n=14)
27%
5.57 (1.2 - 14.2, n=543)
23%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 17min
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
4000 mAh
Maze Alpha X
3900 mAh
Ulefone Power 3
6080 mAh
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Gigaset GS370 Plus
3000 mAh
Batterijduur
21%
177%
21%
-2%
Reader / Idle
1624
965
WiFi v1.3
497
603
21%
1376
177%
601
21%
487
-2%
Load
240
253
H.264
622

Pro

+ uitstekende luidspreker
+ goede stemkwaliteit
+ vrijwel geen bloatware
+ helder beeldscherm met goede kleurweergave
+ redelijk krachtige prestaties
+ hoge kwaliteit behuizing

Contra

- in sommige apps problemen met de GPS
- langzaam WLAN
- (nog) geen Android 8
- hoog stroomverbruik
- matige batterijduur
Testing the Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Testing the Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

De Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus biedt een modern 18:9 beeldscherm met dunne randen, goede stemkwaliteit, fantastische luidspreker, hoge kwaliteit behuizing en fatsoenlijke prestaties.

Je moet echter niet teveel verwachten van de camera en de batterijduur. Voor technisch minder onderlegde gebruikers is het ook lastig om uit te vinden dat de geïntegreerde energiebesparingsmodus in sommige apps de GPS blokkeert. Diegenen die veel online zitten zullen niet perse blij zijn met de Redmi 5 Plus, en hiervoor zijn er aanzienlijk snellere apparaten.

Ondanks de ruwe randjes in sommige features is de Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus een goede deal.

Dus moet je deze smartphone van Xiaomi kopen? We neigen naar ja. Als je kan leven met de minpunten die we genoemd hebben, dan levert de smartphone een behoorlijk goede prijs/prestatie-verhouding. Hoewel dit op papier niet meer in een dergelijke mate is als sommige van zijn voorganger, zijn veel zaken, zoals de garantie, nu beter voor elkaar.

Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus - 15-05-2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Behuizing
88%
Toetsenbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
93%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
41 / 60 → 69%
Gewicht
90%
Batterij
91%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
28 / 63 → 44%
Applicatie-performance
50 / 70 → 72%
Temperatuur
91%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
67%
Gemiddelde
74%
83%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus Smartphone
Florian Wimmer, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06- 6)