Kort testrapport Honor 9 Lite Smartphone

Daniel Schmidt, 24-03-2018

Slimmer. De Honor 9 Lite is voor € 230 niet een slechte koop. De SoC behoort tot de hogere middenklasse en de andere specificaties beloven ook veel goeds. Daarnaast heeft de smartphone 4 camera's. Lees in ons testrapport hoe de smartphone het doet in vergelijking met de concurrent en met het Huawei P zustermodel.

Testtoestel voorzien door Honor Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Size Comparison

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000 Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash	333 MBit/s ∼100% +533%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	278 MBit/s ∼83% +429%
Motorola Moto G5s Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s ∼36% +130%
Nokia 6 Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	117 MBit/s ∼35% +122%
Honor 9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	52.6 MBit/s ∼16%
Huawei P smart Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	51.7 MBit/s ∼16% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	281 MBit/s ∼100% +463%
BQ Aquaris X Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash	270 MBit/s ∼96% +441%
Nokia 6 Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	113 MBit/s ∼40% +126%
Motorola Moto G5s Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	111 MBit/s ∼40% +122%
Huawei P smart Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	50.3 MBit/s ∼18% +1%
Honor 9 Lite Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.9 MBit/s ∼18%

Honor 9 Lite image with front camera in portrait mode

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

klik om beelden te laden

Honor 9 Lite

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)

Apple iPhone X

Canon EOS 70D

klik om beelden te laden

Honor 9 Lite

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)

Apple iPhone X

Canon EOS 70D

klik om beelden te laden

Honor 9 Lite

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)

Apple iPhone X

Canon EOS 70D


684 cd/m²	609 cd/m²	569 cd/m²
671 cd/m²	627 cd/m²	577 cd/m²
673 cd/m²	625 cd/m²	560 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 684 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 621.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.22 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 82 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 627 cd/m²
Contrast: 1529:1 (Zwart: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.26

	Honor 9 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65	Huawei P smart IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65	BQ Aquaris X LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2	Nokia 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5	Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2	ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2	Huawei P10 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2	Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen		-10%	-12%	-20%	4%	-14%	-10%	-11%
Brightness middle	627	573 -9%	675 8%	512 -18%	448 -29%	482 -23%	507 -19%	490 -22%
Brightness	622	568 -9%	702 13%	501 -19%	451 -27%	448 -28%	509 -18%	502 -19%
Brightness Distribution	82	89 9%	91 11%	94 15%	91 11%	79 -4%	95 16%	92 12%
Black Level *	0.41	0.63 -54%	0.59 -44%	0.36 12%		0.64 -56%	0.36 12%	0.43 -5%
Contrast	1529	910 -40%	1144 -25%	1422 -7%		753 -51%	1408 -8%	1140 -25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.5	4.2 7%	4.5 -0%	6.4 -42%	2.7 40%	4 11%	5.1 -13%	5.7 -27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	7	6.4 9%	9.1 -30%	10.9 -56%	9.8 -40%	6.5 7%	9 -29%	7.8 -11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.1	4.6 10%	6.4 -25%	7.2 -41%	1.6 69%	3.4 33%	6.1 -20%	4.7 8%
Gamma	2.26 ^106%	2.24 ^107%	2.24 ^107%	2.28 ^105%	2.06 ^117%	2.13 ^113%	2.28 ^105%	2.4 ^100%
CCT	7201 ^90%	7157 ^91%	7478 ^87%	7904 ^82%	6557 ^99%	6774 ^96%	8143 ^80%	7526 ^86%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
18 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 5 ms stijging
18 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 13 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (26.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
40 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 17 ms stijging
40 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 23 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (42.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	67727 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	45613 Points ∼20% -33%
BQ Aquaris X	63428 Points ∼28% -6%
Nokia 6	47066 Points ∼21% -31%
ZTE Blade V8	45868 Points ∼20% -32%
Huawei P10 Lite	60438 Points ∼27% -11%
Motorola Moto G5s	46370 Points ∼20% -32%
Huawei P smart	66353 Points ∼29% -2%
Huawei Honor 7X	62810 Points ∼28% -7%
Huawei Nova 2	63304 Points ∼28% -7%

AnTuTu v7
MEM (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	9280 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	4775 Points ∼30% -49%
Huawei P smart	8544 Points ∼53% -8%
Huawei Honor 7X	7947 Points ∼49% -14%
UX (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	24145 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	15576 Points ∼27% -35%
Huawei P smart	24255 Points ∼41% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	21484 Points ∼37% -11%
GPU (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	14340 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	8563 Points ∼8% -40%
Huawei P smart	13168 Points ∼12% -8%
Huawei Honor 7X	13110 Points ∼12% -9%
CPU (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	41874 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	32911 Points ∼36% -21%
Huawei P smart	41721 Points ∼45% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	39451 Points ∼43% -6%
Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	89639 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	61825 Points ∼23% -31%
Huawei P smart	87688 Points ∼33% -2%
Huawei Honor 7X	81992 Points ∼31% -9%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	4911 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	3889 Points ∼38% -21%
BQ Aquaris X	4891 Points ∼47% 0%
Nokia 6	3723 Points ∼36% -24%
ZTE Blade V8	3815 Points ∼37% -22%
Huawei P10 Lite	4464 Points ∼43% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s	3604 Points ∼35% -27%
Huawei P smart	4874 Points ∼47% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	4859 Points ∼47% -1%
Huawei Nova 2	4822 Points ∼47% -2%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	5887 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	5006 Points ∼59% -15%
BQ Aquaris X	5792 Points ∼68% -2%
Nokia 6	4980 Points ∼58% -15%
ZTE Blade V8	4978 Points ∼58% -15%
Huawei P10 Lite	5794 Points ∼68% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s	4669 Points ∼55% -21%
Huawei P smart	5817 Points ∼68% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	6213 Points ∼73% +6%
Huawei Nova 2	6252 Points ∼73% +6%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	888 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	737 Points ∼43% -17%
BQ Aquaris X	843 Points ∼50% -5%
Nokia 6	10 Points ∼1% -99%
ZTE Blade V8	744 Points ∼44% -16%
Huawei P10 Lite	654 Points ∼39% -26%
Motorola Moto G5s	703 Points ∼41% -21%
Huawei P smart	919 Points ∼54% +3%
Huawei Honor 7X	724 Points ∼43% -18%
Huawei Nova 2	847 Points ∼50% -5%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	859 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	534 Points ∼6% -38%
BQ Aquaris X	1014 Points ∼11% +18%
Nokia 6	731 Points ∼8% -15%
ZTE Blade V8	787 Points ∼9% -8%
Huawei P10 Lite	829 Points ∼9% -3%
Motorola Moto G5s	723 Points ∼8% -16%
Huawei P smart	857 Points ∼9% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	845 Points ∼9% -2%
Huawei Nova 2	843 Points ∼9% -2%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	1757 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1249 Points ∼28% -29%
BQ Aquaris X	1039 Points ∼23% -41%
Nokia 6	587 Points ∼13% -67%
ZTE Blade V8	812 Points ∼18% -54%
Huawei P10 Lite	1592 Points ∼36% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s	656 Points ∼15% -63%
Huawei P smart	1889 Points ∼43% +8%
Huawei Honor 7X	1788 Points ∼40% +2%
Huawei Nova 2	2011 Points ∼45% +14%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	3058 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	2218 Points ∼22% -27%
BQ Aquaris X	3551 Points ∼35% +16%
Nokia 6	2135 Points ∼21% -30%
ZTE Blade V8	1562 Points ∼15% -49%
Huawei P10 Lite	2642 Points ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s	1553 Points ∼15% -49%
Huawei P smart	3223 Points ∼31% +5%
Huawei Honor 7X	2899 Points ∼28% -5%
Huawei Nova 2	2959 Points ∼29% -3%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	1423 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1022 Points ∼27% -28%
BQ Aquaris X	1333 Points ∼35% -6%
Nokia 6	307 Points ∼8% -78%
ZTE Blade V8	928 Points ∼24% -35%
Huawei P10 Lite	1229 Points ∼32% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s	848 Points ∼22% -40%
Huawei P smart	1480 Points ∼39% +4%
Huawei Honor 7X	1334 Points ∼35% -6%
Huawei Nova 2	1436 Points ∼38% +1%

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	3117 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	2332 Points ∼16% -25%
Motorola Moto G5s	1871 Points ∼13% -40%
Huawei P smart	3117 Points ∼22% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	2772 Points ∼19% -11%
Huawei Nova 2	2997 Points ∼21% -4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	3730 Points ∼14%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	3704 Points ∼14% -1%
BQ Aquaris X	4522 Points ∼17% +21%
Nokia 6	2844 Points ∼11% -24%
Huawei P10 Lite	3460 Points ∼13% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s	2270 Points ∼9% -39%
Huawei P smart	3732 Points ∼14% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	3342 Points ∼13% -10%
Huawei Nova 2	3556 Points ∼14% -5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	945 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	732 Points ∼12% -23%
BQ Aquaris X	929 Points ∼16% -2%
Nokia 6	667 Points ∼11% -29%
Huawei P10 Lite	913 Points ∼15% -3%
Motorola Moto G5s	630 Points ∼11% -33%
Huawei P smart	946 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	869 Points ∼15% -8%
Huawei Nova 2	918 Points ∼15% -3%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	1748 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1727 Points ∼55% -1%
BQ Aquaris X	2179 Points ∼69% +25%
Nokia 6	1225 Points ∼39% -30%
ZTE Blade V8	1214 Points ∼38% -31%
Huawei P10 Lite	1592 Points ∼50% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s	1199 Points ∼38% -31%
Huawei P smart	1827 Points ∼58% +5%
Huawei Honor 7X	1553 Points ∼49% -11%
Huawei Nova 2	1662 Points ∼53% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	253 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	185 Points ∼3% -27%
BQ Aquaris X	380 Points ∼7% +50%
Nokia 6	243 Points ∼5% -4%
ZTE Blade V8	263 Points ∼5% +4%
Huawei P10 Lite	326 Points ∼6% +29%
Motorola Moto G5s	243 Points ∼5% -4%
Huawei P smart	256 Points ∼5% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X	338 Points ∼6% +34%
Huawei Nova 2	330 Points ∼6% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	312 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	231 Points ∼6% -26%
BQ Aquaris X	465 Points ∼12% +49%
Nokia 6	296 Points ∼8% -5%
ZTE Blade V8	318 Points ∼8% +2%
Huawei P10 Lite	396 Points ∼10% +27%
Motorola Moto G5s	295 Points ∼8% -5%
Huawei P smart	316 Points ∼8% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X	409 Points ∼11% +31%
Huawei Nova 2	402 Points ∼10% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	1788 Points ∼58%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1685 Points ∼54% -6%
BQ Aquaris X	2139 Points ∼69% +20%
Nokia 6	1238 Points ∼40% -31%
ZTE Blade V8	1127 Points ∼36% -37%
Huawei P10 Lite	1537 Points ∼50% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s	1158 Points ∼37% -35%
Huawei P smart	1787 Points ∼58% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	1656 Points ∼54% -7%
Huawei Nova 2	1657 Points ∼54% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	184 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	277 Points ∼4% +51%
BQ Aquaris X	724 Points ∼9% +293%
Nokia 6	495 Points ∼6% +169%
ZTE Blade V8	542 Points ∼7% +195%
Huawei P10 Lite	520 Points ∼7% +183%
Motorola Moto G5s	483 Points ∼6% +163%
Huawei P smart	229 Points ∼3% +24%
Huawei Honor 7X	528 Points ∼7% +187%
Huawei Nova 2	526 Points ∼7% +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	230 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	340 Points ∼7% +48%
BQ Aquaris X	849 Points ∼17% +269%
Nokia 6	571 Points ∼11% +148%
ZTE Blade V8	613 Points ∼12% +167%
Huawei P10 Lite	610 Points ∼12% +165%
Motorola Moto G5s	555 Points ∼11% +141%
Huawei P smart	284 Points ∼6% +23%
Huawei Honor 7X	622 Points ∼12% +170%
Huawei Nova 2	620 Points ∼12% +170%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	14780 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	12605 Points ∼16% -15%
BQ Aquaris X	17124 Points ∼22% +16%
Nokia 6	8973 Points ∼11% -39%
ZTE Blade V8	8905 Points ∼11% -40%
Huawei P10 Lite	13510 Points ∼17% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s	9045 Points ∼11% -39%
Huawei P smart	14930 Points ∼19% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X	13372 Points ∼17% -10%
Huawei Nova 2	14488 Points ∼18% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	11712 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	7484 Points ∼2% -36%
BQ Aquaris X	13330 Points ∼3% +14%
Nokia 6	9605 Points ∼2% -18%
ZTE Blade V8	10271 Points ∼2% -12%
Huawei P10 Lite	10603 Points ∼2% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s	9626 Points ∼2% -18%
Huawei P smart	11262 Points ∼2% -4%
Huawei Honor 7X	10332 Points ∼2% -12%
Huawei Nova 2	11688 Points ∼2% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	12278 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	8227 Points ∼4% -33%
BQ Aquaris X	14034 Points ∼7% +14%
Nokia 6	9457 Points ∼5% -23%
ZTE Blade V8	9932 Points ∼5% -19%
Huawei P10 Lite	11135 Points ∼5% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s	9491 Points ∼5% -23%
Huawei P smart	11912 Points ∼6% -3%
Huawei Honor 7X	10882 Points ∼5% -11%
Huawei Nova 2	12212 Points ∼6% -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	19 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	12 fps ∼1% -37%
BQ Aquaris X	23 fps ∼2% +21%
Nokia 6	16 fps ∼1% -16%
ZTE Blade V8	11 fps ∼1% -42%
Huawei P10 Lite	17 fps ∼1% -11%
Motorola Moto G5s	16 fps ∼1% -16%
Huawei P smart	19 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	19 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Nova 2	19 fps ∼1% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	18 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	20 fps ∼4% +11%
BQ Aquaris X	22 fps ∼5% +22%
Nokia 6	16 fps ∼3% -11%
ZTE Blade V8	9.7 fps ∼2% -46%
Huawei P10 Lite	18 fps ∼4% 0%
Motorola Moto G5s	16 fps ∼3% -11%
Huawei P smart	18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei Nova 2	20 fps ∼4% +11%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	8.6 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	5.1 fps ∼1% -41%
BQ Aquaris X	9.8 fps ∼2% +14%
Nokia 6	7.1 fps ∼1% -17%
ZTE Blade V8	4.6 fps ∼1% -47%
Huawei P10 Lite	7.2 fps ∼1% -16%
Motorola Moto G5s	7.1 fps ∼1% -17%
Huawei P smart	8.7 fps ∼2% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X	8 fps ∼1% -7%
Huawei Nova 2	7.9 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	8.4 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	10 fps ∼3% +19%
BQ Aquaris X	9.7 fps ∼3% +15%
Nokia 6	7 fps ∼2% -17%
ZTE Blade V8	4.5 fps ∼1% -46%
Huawei P10 Lite	7.7 fps ∼2% -8%
Motorola Moto G5s	7.4 fps ∼2% -12%
Huawei P smart	8.3 fps ∼2% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X	7.9 fps ∼2% -6%
Huawei Nova 2	8.9 fps ∼2% +6%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	3.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	3.2 fps ∼1% 0%
BQ Aquaris X	6.4 fps ∼2% +100%
Nokia 6	4.6 fps ∼1% +44%
ZTE Blade V8	2.4 fps ∼1% -25%
Huawei P10 Lite	4.2 fps ∼1% +31%
Motorola Moto G5s	4.6 fps ∼1% +44%
Huawei P smart	5.3 fps ∼1% +66%
Huawei Honor 7X	4.7 fps ∼1% +47%
Huawei Nova 2	4.8 fps ∼1% +50%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	5 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	7.4 fps ∼4% +48%
BQ Aquaris X	6.3 fps ∼4% +26%
Nokia 6	4.5 fps ∼3% -10%
ZTE Blade V8	4.9 fps ∼3% -2%
Huawei P10 Lite	4.8 fps ∼3% -4%
Motorola Moto G5s	5 fps ∼3% 0%
Huawei P smart	5.2 fps ∼3% +4%
Huawei Honor 7X	4.5 fps ∼3% -10%
Huawei Nova 2	5.2 fps ∼3% +4%

GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	3.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1.9 fps ∼1% -41%
BQ Aquaris X	3.5 fps ∼1% +9%
Nokia 6	2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
ZTE Blade V8	2.1 fps ∼1% -34%
Huawei P10 Lite	2.8 fps ∼1% -12%
Motorola Moto G5s	2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
Huawei P smart	3.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	2.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Huawei Nova 2	2.9 fps ∼1% -9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite	2.9 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	3.7 fps ∼3% +28%
BQ Aquaris X	3.5 fps ∼3% +21%
Nokia 6	2.5 fps ∼2% -14%
ZTE Blade V8	2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
Huawei P10 Lite	3 fps ∼3% +3%
Motorola Moto G5s	2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
Huawei P smart	2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X	2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei Nova 2	3.1 fps ∼3% +7%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Honor 7X	4.32 fps ∼11%
Huawei Nova 2	4.96 fps ∼13%

Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Blade V8	8015 Points ∼18%
Huawei Honor 7X	8774 Points ∼20%
Huawei Nova 2	8749 Points ∼20%
Medium Quality (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Blade V8	16486 Points ∼37%
Huawei Honor 7X	16931 Points ∼38%
Huawei Nova 2	17001 Points ∼38%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Blade V8	110 Points ∼6%
Huawei Nova 2	147 Points ∼8%

Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Nova 2	47.3 fps ∼77%

Legende

Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash

BQ Aquaris X Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 658, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Huawei Nova 2 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)	30.047 Points ∼100% +14%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)	27.096 Points ∼90% +3%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)	26.63 Points ∼89% +1%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)	26.42 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)	26.37 Points ∼88% 0%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	18.661 Points ∼62% -29%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)	17.558 Points ∼58% -34%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)	17.524 Points ∼58% -34%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)	4968 Points ∼100% +5%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)	4786 Points ∼96% +1%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)	4742 Points ∼95%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)	4589 Points ∼92% -3%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)	4497 Points ∼91% -5%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	3035 Points ∼61% -36%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)	2899 Points ∼58% -39%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)	2826 Points ∼57% -40%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	13057 ms * ∼100% -27%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)	12297.4 ms * ∼94% -20%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)	12062.3 ms * ∼92% -18%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)	10250.4 ms * ∼79%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)	9698.2 ms * ∼74% +5%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)	8825.1 ms * ∼68% +14%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)	8590.8 ms * ∼66% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)	6784.4 ms * ∼52% +34%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)	108 Points ∼100%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)	92 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)	80 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)	62 Points ∼57% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	61 Points ∼56% -44%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)	60 Points ∼56% -44%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)	53 Points ∼49% -51%

* ... kleiner is beter

	Honor 9 Lite	Huawei P smart	Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	BQ Aquaris X	Nokia 6	Motorola Moto G5s
AndroBench 3-5		-14%	-48%	-31%	-33%	-22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	44.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -39%	62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13%	56.6 -21%	62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1%	72.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -13%	84.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%	84.6 2%	84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%
Random Write 4KB	66.83	21.3 -68%	9.9 -85%	11.85 -82%	11.34 -83%	46.2 -31%
Random Read 4KB	68.39	66.11 -3%	24.07 -65%	37.47 -45%	33.8 -51%	40.6 -41%
Sequential Write 256KB	138.21	121.07 -12%	51.96 -62%	75.34 -45%	77.06 -44%	77.5 -44%
Sequential Read 256KB	269.56	269.36 0%	204.45 -24%	266.37 -1%	273.06 1%	259 -4%

Asphalt 8: Airborne | Dead Trigger 2

Asphalt 8: Airborne - high
Nokia 6	24 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei P10 Lite	22 fps ∼92% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	22 fps ∼92% +38%
ZTE Blade V8	19 fps ∼79% +19%
Huawei P smart	18 fps ∼75% +13%
Honor 9 Lite	16 fps ∼67%

Dead Trigger 2 - high
Huawei P smart	58 fps ∼100% +93%
Huawei P10 Lite	51 fps ∼88% +70%
Nokia 6	50 fps ∼86% +67%
ZTE Blade V8	30 fps ∼52% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	30 fps ∼52% 0%
Honor 9 Lite	30 fps ∼52%

Max. Belasting

Inactief


33 °C	33.1 °C	33.7 °C
32.7 °C	31.7 °C	34.6 °C
32 °C	31.3 °C	33.3 °C

Maximum: 34.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.8 °C


30.1 °C	30.6 °C	33 °C
29.6 °C	30 °C	33.2 °C
29.4 °C	30.2 °C	31.9 °C

Maximum: 33.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.9 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 28.4 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

Honor 9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.01 / 0.26 Watt
Inactief	0.85 / 2 / 2.04 Watt
Belasting	3.23 / 4.93 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh	BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh	Nokia 6 3000 mAh	ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh	Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh	Huawei P smart 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		42%	-8%	3%	1%	-2%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	0.85	0.52 39%	1.12 -32%	0.63 26%	0.98 -15%	0.67 21%	0.62 27%
Idle Average *	2	1.17 41%	2.16 -8%	1.75 12%	1.76 12%	1.4 30%	1.76 12%
Idle Maximum *	2.04	1.24 39%	2.18 -7%	1.87 8%	1.79 12%	1.52 25%	1.87 8%
Load Average *	3.23	1.66 49%	2.94 9%	3.56 -10%	2.89 11%	4.56 -41%	4.47 -38%
Load Maximum *	4.93	2.94 40%	5.1 -3%	5.85 -19%	5.62 -14%	7.05 -43%	6.39 -30%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		16h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 63)		10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 22min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		4h 13min

	Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh	BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh	Nokia 6 3000 mAh	ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh	Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh	Huawei P smart 3000 mAh
Batterijduur		52%	-1%	16%	5%	2%	-6%
Reader / Idle	965	1564 62%		1695 76%	964 0%	1233 28%	985 2%
H.264	622	917 47%		542 -13%	545 -12%	645 4%	615 -1%
WiFi v1.3	601	738 23%	592 -1%	670 11%	700 16%	518 -14%	565 -6%
Load	253	449 77%		228 -10%	297 17%	225 -11%	202 -20%

Pro

+ helder, contrastrijk beeldscherm

+ slank ontwerp

+ FM radio

+ hybride SIM-slot

+ snel LTE Cat. 13

+ uitbreidbare opslag

+ goede selfie dual camera

Contra

- matige luidsprekers

- zwakke GPU

- geen USB Type-C poort

- geen AC Wi-Fi

Review: The Honor 9 Lite. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Honor is erin geslaagd om een goede middenklasse smartphone te maken: de 9 Lite. Deze maakt indruk met zijn heldere beeldscherm, fatsoenlijke dual camera's en vloeiende systeemprestaties. Daarnaast is er het fraaie design met aantrekkelijke kleuropties.

De batterijlevensduur van de smartphone is goed, maar had met betere optimalisaties nog langer kunnen zijn. Helaas heeft de 9 Lite nog steeds een Micro-USB poort en is de Wi-Fi relatief traag. Daarentegen is de LTE behoorlijk snel.

De Honor 9 Lite doet het goed met zijn heldere beeldscherm, snelle LTE en vier camera's. Gamers aan de andere kant zullen niet uit de voeten kunnen met de smartphone.

In de directe vergelijking met de Huawei P smart zijn we blij om te zien dat ons testmodel iets beter presteerde door het helderder beeldscherm en betere front camera's. Ook is de prijs iets lager. Als het idee van een smartphone met een glazen achterkant je niet aanstaat, dan kun je beter kiezen voor de P smart, welke een aluminium behuizing heeft.

Honor 9 Lite - 2018-03-0909-03-2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing

87%

Toetsenbord

70 / 75 → 94%

Aanwijsapparaat

91%

Aansluitmogelijkheden

39 / 60 → 66%

Gewicht

92%

Batterij

92%

Beeldscherm

87%

Gaming-performance

19 / 63 → 29%

Applicatie-performance

54 / 70 → 78%

Temperatuur

92%

Luidheid

100%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Camera

72%

Gemiddelde

74%

84%

Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Kort testrapport Honor 9 Lite Smartphone

Size Comparison

Top 10 Testrapporten

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Responstijd Scherm

Honor 9 Lite audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis

Nokia 6 audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare