Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Honor 9 Lite Smartphone

Daniel Schmidt, 24-03-2018

Slimmer. De Honor 9 Lite is voor € 230 niet een slechte koop. De SoC behoort tot de hogere middenklasse en de andere specificaties beloven ook veel goeds. Daarnaast heeft de smartphone 4 camera's. Lees in ons testrapport hoe de smartphone het doet in vergelijking met de concurrent en met het Huawei P zustermodel.

Honor 9 Lite (9 Serie)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 659
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T830 MP2
Geheugen
3072 MB 
Beeldscherm
5.65 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 427 PPI, capacitief, 10 multi-touch punten, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 22.74 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm combo audio aansluiting, Card Reader: microSD-kaart tot max. 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: nabijheidssensor, versnellingsmeter, kompas, OTG, FM radio
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 and 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900 and 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 13 (Band 1, 3, 7, 8 and 20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7.6 x 151 x 71.9
Batterij
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (auto focus, f/2.2, portret modus, 1080p video)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (auto focus, f/2.0, portret modus, 1080p video)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Toetsenbord: virtueel, USB-kabel, modulaire stroomadapter, koptelefoon, beschermende behuizing, EMUI 8.0, 24 Maanden Garantie, Micro-USB 2.0 FM radio, hoofd SAR: 0.77 W/kg, lichaam SAR: 0.99 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
149 g, Voeding: 62 g
Prijs
229 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
333 MBit/s ∼100% +533%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
278 MBit/s ∼83% +429%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
121 MBit/s ∼36% +130%
Nokia 6
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
117 MBit/s ∼35% +122%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
52.6 MBit/s ∼16%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
51.7 MBit/s ∼16% -2%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
281 MBit/s ∼100% +463%
BQ Aquaris X
Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash
270 MBit/s ∼96% +441%
Nokia 6
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 MBit/s ∼40% +126%
Motorola Moto G5s
Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
111 MBit/s ∼40% +122%
Huawei P smart
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
50.3 MBit/s ∼18% +1%
Honor 9 Lite
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.9 MBit/s ∼18%
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite
Honor 9 Lite image with front camera
Honor 9 Lite image with front camera in portrait mode
Huawei P smart image with front camera

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
684
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
671
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
577
cd/m²
673
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
560
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 684 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 621.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.22 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 82 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 627 cd/m²
Contrast: 1529:1 (Zwart: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.26
Honor 9 Lite
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
Huawei P smart
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65
BQ Aquaris X
LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2
Nokia 6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2
ZTE Blade V8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Huawei P10 Lite
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Motorola Moto G5s
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2
Screen
-10%
-12%
-20%
4%
-14%
-10%
-11%
Brightness middle
627
573
-9%
675
8%
512
-18%
448
-29%
482
-23%
507
-19%
490
-22%
Brightness
622
568
-9%
702
13%
501
-19%
451
-27%
448
-28%
509
-18%
502
-19%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
91
11%
94
15%
91
11%
79
-4%
95
16%
92
12%
Black Level *
0.41
0.63
-54%
0.59
-44%
0.36
12%
0.64
-56%
0.36
12%
0.43
-5%
Contrast
1529
910
-40%
1144
-25%
1422
-7%
753
-51%
1408
-8%
1140
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
4.2
7%
4.5
-0%
6.4
-42%
2.7
40%
4
11%
5.1
-13%
5.7
-27%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7
6.4
9%
9.1
-30%
10.9
-56%
9.8
-40%
6.5
7%
9
-29%
7.8
-11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.1
4.6
10%
6.4
-25%
7.2
-41%
1.6
69%
3.4
33%
6.1
-20%
4.7
8%
Gamma
2.26 106%
2.24 107%
2.24 107%
2.28 105%
2.06 117%
2.13 113%
2.28 105%
2.4 100%
CCT
7201 90%
7157 91%
7478 87%
7904 82%
6557 99%
6774 96%
8143 80%
7526 86%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 10727 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
18 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 13 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (26 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
40 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 17 ms stijging
↘ 23 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
67727 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
45613 Points ∼20% -33%
BQ Aquaris X
63428 Points ∼28% -6%
Nokia 6
47066 Points ∼20% -31%
ZTE Blade V8
45868 Points ∼20% -32%
Huawei P10 Lite
60438 Points ∼26% -11%
Motorola Moto G5s
46370 Points ∼20% -32%
Huawei P smart
66353 Points ∼29% -2%
Huawei Honor 7X
62810 Points ∼27% -7%
Huawei Nova 2
63304 Points ∼27% -7%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
9280 Points ∼53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
4775 Points ∼27% -49%
Huawei P smart
8544 Points ∼49% -8%
Huawei Honor 7X
7947 Points ∼46% -14%
UX (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
24145 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
15576 Points ∼27% -35%
Huawei P smart
24255 Points ∼41% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
21484 Points ∼37% -11%
GPU (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
14340 Points ∼11%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8563 Points ∼7% -40%
Huawei P smart
13168 Points ∼10% -8%
Huawei Honor 7X
13110 Points ∼10% -9%
CPU (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
41874 Points ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
32911 Points ∼33% -21%
Huawei P smart
41721 Points ∼42% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
39451 Points ∼40% -6%
Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
89639 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
61825 Points ∼21% -31%
Huawei P smart
87688 Points ∼30% -2%
Huawei Honor 7X
81992 Points ∼28% -9%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
4911 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3889 Points ∼38% -21%
BQ Aquaris X
4891 Points ∼47% 0%
Nokia 6
3723 Points ∼36% -24%
ZTE Blade V8
3815 Points ∼37% -22%
Huawei P10 Lite
4464 Points ∼43% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
3604 Points ∼35% -27%
Huawei P smart
4874 Points ∼47% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X
4859 Points ∼47% -1%
Huawei Nova 2
4822 Points ∼47% -2%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
5887 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5006 Points ∼49% -15%
BQ Aquaris X
5792 Points ∼56% -2%
Nokia 6
4980 Points ∼49% -15%
ZTE Blade V8
4978 Points ∼48% -15%
Huawei P10 Lite
5794 Points ∼56% -2%
Motorola Moto G5s
4669 Points ∼45% -21%
Huawei P smart
5817 Points ∼57% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X
6213 Points ∼61% +6%
Huawei Nova 2
6252 Points ∼61% +6%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
888 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
737 Points ∼43% -17%
BQ Aquaris X
843 Points ∼50% -5%
Nokia 6
10 Points ∼1% -99%
ZTE Blade V8
744 Points ∼44% -16%
Huawei P10 Lite
654 Points ∼39% -26%
Motorola Moto G5s
703 Points ∼41% -21%
Huawei P smart
919 Points ∼54% +3%
Huawei Honor 7X
724 Points ∼43% -18%
Huawei Nova 2
847 Points ∼50% -5%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
859 Points ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
534 Points ∼6% -38%
BQ Aquaris X
1014 Points ∼11% +18%
Nokia 6
731 Points ∼8% -15%
ZTE Blade V8
787 Points ∼9% -8%
Huawei P10 Lite
829 Points ∼9% -3%
Motorola Moto G5s
723 Points ∼8% -16%
Huawei P smart
857 Points ∼9% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
845 Points ∼9% -2%
Huawei Nova 2
843 Points ∼9% -2%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
1757 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1249 Points ∼28% -29%
BQ Aquaris X
1039 Points ∼23% -41%
Nokia 6
587 Points ∼13% -67%
ZTE Blade V8
812 Points ∼18% -54%
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points ∼36% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
656 Points ∼15% -63%
Huawei P smart
1889 Points ∼43% +8%
Huawei Honor 7X
1788 Points ∼40% +2%
Huawei Nova 2
2011 Points ∼45% +14%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
3058 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2218 Points ∼22% -27%
BQ Aquaris X
3551 Points ∼35% +16%
Nokia 6
2135 Points ∼21% -30%
ZTE Blade V8
1562 Points ∼15% -49%
Huawei P10 Lite
2642 Points ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
1553 Points ∼15% -49%
Huawei P smart
3223 Points ∼31% +5%
Huawei Honor 7X
2899 Points ∼28% -5%
Huawei Nova 2
2959 Points ∼29% -3%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
1423 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1022 Points ∼24% -28%
BQ Aquaris X
1333 Points ∼31% -6%
Nokia 6
307 Points ∼7% -78%
ZTE Blade V8
928 Points ∼22% -35%
Huawei P10 Lite
1229 Points ∼29% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
848 Points ∼20% -40%
Huawei P smart
1480 Points ∼34% +4%
Huawei Honor 7X
1334 Points ∼31% -6%
Huawei Nova 2
1436 Points ∼33% +1%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
3117 Points ∼22%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
2332 Points ∼16% -25%
Motorola Moto G5s
1871 Points ∼13% -40%
Huawei P smart
3117 Points ∼22% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
2772 Points ∼19% -11%
Huawei Nova 2
2997 Points ∼21% -4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
3730 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3704 Points ∼13% -1%
BQ Aquaris X
4522 Points ∼16% +21%
Nokia 6
2844 Points ∼10% -24%
Huawei P10 Lite
3460 Points ∼12% -7%
Motorola Moto G5s
2270 Points ∼8% -39%
Huawei P smart
3732 Points ∼13% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
3342 Points ∼12% -10%
Huawei Nova 2
3556 Points ∼12% -5%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
945 Points ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
732 Points ∼12% -23%
BQ Aquaris X
929 Points ∼16% -2%
Nokia 6
667 Points ∼11% -29%
Huawei P10 Lite
913 Points ∼15% -3%
Motorola Moto G5s
630 Points ∼11% -33%
Huawei P smart
946 Points ∼16% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
869 Points ∼15% -8%
Huawei Nova 2
918 Points ∼15% -3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
1748 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1727 Points ∼47% -1%
BQ Aquaris X
2179 Points ∼59% +25%
Nokia 6
1225 Points ∼33% -30%
ZTE Blade V8
1214 Points ∼33% -31%
Huawei P10 Lite
1592 Points ∼43% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
1199 Points ∼33% -31%
Huawei P smart
1827 Points ∼50% +5%
Huawei Honor 7X
1553 Points ∼42% -11%
Huawei Nova 2
1662 Points ∼45% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
253 Points ∼5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
185 Points ∼3% -27%
BQ Aquaris X
380 Points ∼7% +50%
Nokia 6
243 Points ∼5% -4%
ZTE Blade V8
263 Points ∼5% +4%
Huawei P10 Lite
326 Points ∼6% +29%
Motorola Moto G5s
243 Points ∼5% -4%
Huawei P smart
256 Points ∼5% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X
338 Points ∼6% +34%
Huawei Nova 2
330 Points ∼6% +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
312 Points ∼7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
231 Points ∼5% -26%
BQ Aquaris X
465 Points ∼10% +49%
Nokia 6
296 Points ∼6% -5%
ZTE Blade V8
318 Points ∼7% +2%
Huawei P10 Lite
396 Points ∼8% +27%
Motorola Moto G5s
295 Points ∼6% -5%
Huawei P smart
316 Points ∼7% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X
409 Points ∼9% +31%
Huawei Nova 2
402 Points ∼8% +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
1788 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1685 Points ∼46% -6%
BQ Aquaris X
2139 Points ∼59% +20%
Nokia 6
1238 Points ∼34% -31%
ZTE Blade V8
1127 Points ∼31% -37%
Huawei P10 Lite
1537 Points ∼42% -14%
Motorola Moto G5s
1158 Points ∼32% -35%
Huawei P smart
1787 Points ∼49% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
1656 Points ∼45% -7%
Huawei Nova 2
1657 Points ∼45% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
184 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
277 Points ∼3% +51%
BQ Aquaris X
724 Points ∼9% +293%
Nokia 6
495 Points ∼6% +169%
ZTE Blade V8
542 Points ∼7% +195%
Huawei P10 Lite
520 Points ∼6% +183%
Motorola Moto G5s
483 Points ∼6% +163%
Huawei P smart
229 Points ∼3% +24%
Huawei Honor 7X
528 Points ∼6% +187%
Huawei Nova 2
526 Points ∼6% +186%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
230 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
340 Points ∼5% +48%
BQ Aquaris X
849 Points ∼13% +269%
Nokia 6
571 Points ∼9% +148%
ZTE Blade V8
613 Points ∼10% +167%
Huawei P10 Lite
610 Points ∼10% +165%
Motorola Moto G5s
555 Points ∼9% +141%
Huawei P smart
284 Points ∼4% +23%
Huawei Honor 7X
622 Points ∼10% +170%
Huawei Nova 2
620 Points ∼10% +170%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
14780 Points ∼19%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12605 Points ∼16% -15%
BQ Aquaris X
17124 Points ∼22% +16%
Nokia 6
8973 Points ∼11% -39%
ZTE Blade V8
8905 Points ∼11% -40%
Huawei P10 Lite
13510 Points ∼17% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
9045 Points ∼11% -39%
Huawei P smart
14930 Points ∼19% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X
13372 Points ∼17% -10%
Huawei Nova 2
14488 Points ∼18% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
11712 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7484 Points ∼2% -36%
BQ Aquaris X
13330 Points ∼3% +14%
Nokia 6
9605 Points ∼2% -18%
ZTE Blade V8
10271 Points ∼2% -12%
Huawei P10 Lite
10603 Points ∼2% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
9626 Points ∼2% -18%
Huawei P smart
11262 Points ∼2% -4%
Huawei Honor 7X
10332 Points ∼2% -12%
Huawei Nova 2
11688 Points ∼2% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
12278 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
8227 Points ∼4% -33%
BQ Aquaris X
14034 Points ∼7% +14%
Nokia 6
9457 Points ∼5% -23%
ZTE Blade V8
9932 Points ∼5% -19%
Huawei P10 Lite
11135 Points ∼5% -9%
Motorola Moto G5s
9491 Points ∼5% -23%
Huawei P smart
11912 Points ∼6% -3%
Huawei Honor 7X
10882 Points ∼5% -11%
Huawei Nova 2
12212 Points ∼6% -1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
19 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
12 fps ∼1% -37%
BQ Aquaris X
23 fps ∼1% +21%
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼1% -16%
ZTE Blade V8
11 fps ∼1% -42%
Huawei P10 Lite
17 fps ∼1% -11%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼1% -16%
Huawei P smart
19 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
19 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Nova 2
19 fps ∼1% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
18 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
20 fps ∼4% +11%
BQ Aquaris X
22 fps ∼5% +22%
Nokia 6
16 fps ∼3% -11%
ZTE Blade V8
9.7 fps ∼2% -46%
Huawei P10 Lite
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Motorola Moto G5s
16 fps ∼3% -11%
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
18 fps ∼4% 0%
Huawei Nova 2
20 fps ∼4% +11%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
8.6 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
5.1 fps ∼1% -41%
BQ Aquaris X
9.8 fps ∼2% +14%
Nokia 6
7.1 fps ∼1% -17%
ZTE Blade V8
4.6 fps ∼1% -47%
Huawei P10 Lite
7.2 fps ∼1% -16%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.1 fps ∼1% -17%
Huawei P smart
8.7 fps ∼2% +1%
Huawei Honor 7X
8 fps ∼1% -7%
Huawei Nova 2
7.9 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
8.4 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
10 fps ∼3% +19%
BQ Aquaris X
9.7 fps ∼3% +15%
Nokia 6
7 fps ∼2% -17%
ZTE Blade V8
4.5 fps ∼1% -46%
Huawei P10 Lite
7.7 fps ∼2% -8%
Motorola Moto G5s
7.4 fps ∼2% -12%
Huawei P smart
8.3 fps ∼2% -1%
Huawei Honor 7X
7.9 fps ∼2% -6%
Huawei Nova 2
8.9 fps ∼2% +6%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.2 fps ∼1% 0%
BQ Aquaris X
6.4 fps ∼1% +100%
Nokia 6
4.6 fps ∼1% +44%
ZTE Blade V8
2.4 fps ∼0% -25%
Huawei P10 Lite
4.2 fps ∼1% +31%
Motorola Moto G5s
4.6 fps ∼1% +44%
Huawei P smart
5.3 fps ∼1% +66%
Huawei Honor 7X
4.7 fps ∼1% +47%
Huawei Nova 2
4.8 fps ∼1% +50%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
5 fps ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
7.4 fps ∼4% +48%
BQ Aquaris X
6.3 fps ∼4% +26%
Nokia 6
4.5 fps ∼3% -10%
ZTE Blade V8
4.9 fps ∼3% -2%
Huawei P10 Lite
4.8 fps ∼3% -4%
Motorola Moto G5s
5 fps ∼3% 0%
Huawei P smart
5.2 fps ∼3% +4%
Huawei Honor 7X
4.5 fps ∼3% -10%
Huawei Nova 2
5.2 fps ∼3% +4%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
3.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
1.9 fps ∼0% -41%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps ∼1% +9%
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
ZTE Blade V8
2.1 fps ∼1% -34%
Huawei P10 Lite
2.8 fps ∼1% -12%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.5 fps ∼1% -22%
Huawei P smart
3.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
2.9 fps ∼1% -9%
Huawei Nova 2
2.9 fps ∼1% -9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Honor 9 Lite
2.9 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3.7 fps ∼3% +28%
BQ Aquaris X
3.5 fps ∼3% +21%
Nokia 6
2.5 fps ∼2% -14%
ZTE Blade V8
2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
Huawei P10 Lite
3 fps ∼3% +3%
Motorola Moto G5s
2.7 fps ∼2% -7%
Huawei P smart
2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei Honor 7X
2.9 fps ∼2% 0%
Huawei Nova 2
3.1 fps ∼3% +7%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Honor 7X
4.32 fps ∼11%
Huawei Nova 2
4.96 fps ∼13%
Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Blade V8
8015 Points ∼18%
Huawei Honor 7X
8774 Points ∼20%
Huawei Nova 2
8749 Points ∼20%
Medium Quality (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Blade V8
16486 Points ∼37%
Huawei Honor 7X
16931 Points ∼38%
Huawei Nova 2
17001 Points ∼38%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
ZTE Blade V8
110 Points ∼6%
Huawei Nova 2
147 Points ∼8%
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Nova 2
47.3 fps ∼77%

Legende

 
Honor 9 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
BQ Aquaris X Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P10 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 658, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P smart HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Honor 7X HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Nova 2 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
30.047 Points ∼100% +14%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
27.096 Points ∼90% +3%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
26.63 Points ∼89% +1%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
26.42 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
26.37 Points ∼88% 0%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
18.661 Points ∼62% -29%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
17.558 Points ∼58% -34%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
17.524 Points ∼58% -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
4968 Points ∼100% +5%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
4786 Points ∼96% +1%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
4742 Points ∼95%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
4589 Points ∼92% -3%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
4497 Points ∼91% -5%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
3035 Points ∼61% -36%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
2899 Points ∼58% -39%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
2826 Points ∼57% -40%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
13057 ms * ∼100% -27%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
12297.4 ms * ∼94% -20%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
12062.3 ms * ∼92% -18%
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
10250.4 ms * ∼79%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
9698.2 ms * ∼74% +5%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)
8825.1 ms * ∼68% +14%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
8590.8 ms * ∼66% +16%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
6784.4 ms * ∼52% +34%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63)
108 Points ∼100%
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64)
92 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)
80 Points ∼74% -26%
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91)
62 Points ∼57% -43%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)
61 Points ∼56% -44%
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125)
60 Points ∼56% -44%
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132)
53 Points ∼49% -51%

* ... kleiner is beter

Honor 9 LiteHuawei P smartSamsung Galaxy J5 (2017) DuosBQ Aquaris XNokia 6Motorola Moto G5s
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
-48%
-31%
-33%
-22%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
44.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-39%
62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
56.6
-21%
62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-13%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
72.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-13%
84.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
84.6
2%
84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
Random Write 4KB
66.83
21.3
-68%
9.9
-85%
11.85
-82%
11.34
-83%
46.2
-31%
Random Read 4KB
68.39
66.11
-3%
24.07
-65%
37.47
-45%
33.8
-51%
40.6
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB
138.21
121.07
-12%
51.96
-62%
75.34
-45%
77.06
-44%
77.5
-44%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.56
269.36
0%
204.45
-24%
266.37
-1%
273.06
1%
259
-4%
Asphalt 8: Airborne - high
Nokia 6
24 fps ∼100% +50%
Huawei P10 Lite
22 fps ∼92% +38%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
22 fps ∼92% +38%
ZTE Blade V8
19 fps ∼79% +19%
Huawei P smart
18 fps ∼75% +13%
Honor 9 Lite
16 fps ∼67%
Dead Trigger 2 - high
Huawei P smart
58 fps ∼100% +93%
Huawei P10 Lite
51 fps ∼88% +70%
Nokia 6
50 fps ∼86% +67%
ZTE Blade V8
30 fps ∼52% 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
30 fps ∼52% 0%
Honor 9 Lite
30 fps ∼52%
Max. Belasting
 33 °C33.1 °C33.7 °C 
 32.7 °C31.7 °C34.6 °C 
 32 °C31.3 °C33.3 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 32.8 °C
30.1 °C30.6 °C33 °C
29.6 °C30 °C33.2 °C
29.4 °C30.2 °C31.9 °C
Maximum: 33.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  28.4 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
The maximum temp on the upper side is 34.6 °C, compared to the average of 35.9 °C ranging from 21.1 °C to 71 °C for class Smartphone.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.238.32532.938.73137.231.14031.732.95039.636.36328.330.68027.327.110026.930.312526.729.11602435.220020.939.925020.943.531519.548.640018.556.950017.560.463017.563.380015.765.4100015.870125016.671.8160015.873.2200015.470.7250015.571.131501672.5400015.87850001679630016.375.2800016.375.21000016.277.71250016.468.71600016.458.3SPL28.686.1N1.162.4median 16.4Honor 9 Litemedian 68.7Delta2.112.231.63225.438.425.33432.93033.629.631.628.528.429.32731.820.834.92243.421.349.120.855.521.260.719.463.719.567.417.770.217.971.417.868.917.37017.472.616.775.117.277.418.278.117.981.417.676.717.775.417.874.517.970.518.161.818.258.43086.81.370median 17.9Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duosmedian 701.39.530.529.430.531303134.829.834.837.93337.93226.53230.826.230.833.630.933.631.832.431.838.232.638.240.621.940.650.421.250.456.720.856.761.619.261.663.520.863.567.421.667.467.518.767.567.217.967.265.417.665.463.817.263.86416.46469.516.769.569.116.469.166.516.166.564.515.964.564.81664.863.11663.16216.16262.215.962.257.915.957.950.21650.27829.678431.343median 63.5Nokia 6median 17.2median 63.56.42.66.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Honor 9 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Nokia 6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.26 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.85 / 2 / 2.04 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.23 / 4.93 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Nokia 6
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Power Consumption
42%
-8%
3%
1%
-2%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.85
0.52
39%
1.12
-32%
0.63
26%
0.98
-15%
0.67
21%
0.62
27%
Idle Average *
2
1.17
41%
2.16
-8%
1.75
12%
1.76
12%
1.4
30%
1.76
12%
Idle Maximum *
2.04
1.24
39%
2.18
-7%
1.87
8%
1.79
12%
1.52
25%
1.87
8%
Load Average *
3.23
1.66
49%
2.94
9%
3.56
-10%
2.89
11%
4.56
-41%
4.47
-38%
Load Maximum *
4.93
2.94
40%
5.1
-3%
5.85
-19%
5.62
-14%
7.05
-43%
6.39
-30%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
16h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 63)
10h 01min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 22min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 13min
Honor 9 Lite
3000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos
3000 mAh
BQ Aquaris X
3100 mAh
Nokia 6
3000 mAh
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Motorola Moto G5s
3000 mAh
Huawei P smart
3000 mAh
Batterijduur
52%
-1%
16%
5%
2%
-6%
Reader / Idle
965
1564
62%
1695
76%
964
0%
1233
28%
985
2%
H.264
622
917
47%
542
-13%
545
-12%
645
4%
615
-1%
WiFi v1.3
601
738
23%
592
-1%
670
11%
700
16%
518
-14%
565
-6%
Load
253
449
77%
228
-10%
297
17%
225
-11%
202
-20%

Pro

+ helder, contrastrijk beeldscherm
+ slank ontwerp
+ FM radio
+ hybride SIM-slot
+ snel LTE Cat. 13
+ uitbreidbare opslag
+ goede selfie dual camera

Contra

- matige luidsprekers
- zwakke GPU
- geen USB Type-C poort
- geen AC Wi-Fi
Review: The Honor 9 Lite. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.
Review: The Honor 9 Lite. Test unit provided by Honor Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Honor is erin geslaagd om een goede middenklasse smartphone te maken: de 9 Lite. Deze maakt indruk met zijn heldere beeldscherm, fatsoenlijke dual camera's en vloeiende systeemprestaties. Daarnaast is er het fraaie design met aantrekkelijke kleuropties.

De batterijlevensduur van de smartphone is goed, maar had met betere optimalisaties nog langer kunnen zijn. Helaas heeft de 9 Lite nog steeds een Micro-USB poort en is de Wi-Fi relatief traag. Daarentegen is de LTE behoorlijk snel.

De Honor 9 Lite doet het goed met zijn heldere beeldscherm, snelle LTE en vier camera's. Gamers aan de andere kant zullen niet uit de voeten kunnen met de smartphone.

In de directe vergelijking met de Huawei P smart zijn we blij om te zien dat ons testmodel iets beter presteerde door het helderder beeldscherm en betere front camera's. Ook is de prijs iets lager. Als het idee van een smartphone met een glazen achterkant je niet aanstaat, dan kun je beter kiezen voor de P smart, welke een aluminium behuizing heeft.

Honor 9 Lite - 09-03-2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing
87%
Toetsenbord
70 / 75 → 94%
Aanwijsapparaat
91%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
39 / 60 → 66%
Gewicht
92%
Batterij
92%
Beeldscherm
87%
Gaming-performance
19 / 63 → 29%
Applicatie-performance
54 / 70 → 78%
Temperatuur
92%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
64 / 91 → 70%
Camera
72%
Gemiddelde
74%
84%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Honor 9 Lite Smartphone
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-03-24 (Update: 2018-03-24)