Kort testrapport Honor 9 Lite Smartphone
Slimmer. De Honor 9 Lite is voor € 230 niet een slechte koop. De SoC behoort tot de hogere middenklasse en de andere specificaties beloven ook veel goeds. Daarnaast heeft de smartphone 4 camera's. Lees in ons testrapport hoe de smartphone het doet in vergelijking met de concurrent en met het Huawei P zustermodel.
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix + 2 MPix (auto focus, f/2.0, portret modus, 1080p video)
Size Comparison
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Nokia 6 | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Huawei P smart | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Honor 9 Lite |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 82 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 627 cd/m²
Contrast: 1529:1 (Zwart: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.26
Honor 9 Lite IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65 | Huawei P smart IPS, 2160x1080, 5.65 | BQ Aquaris X LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2 | Nokia 6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5 | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2 | ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2 | Huawei P10 Lite IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2 | Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -10% | -12% | -20% | 4% | -14% | -10% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 627 | 573 -9% | 675 8% | 512 -18% | 448 -29% | 482 -23% | 507 -19% | 490 -22% |
Brightness | 622 | 568 -9% | 702 13% | 501 -19% | 451 -27% | 448 -28% | 509 -18% | 502 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 89 9% | 91 11% | 94 15% | 91 11% | 79 -4% | 95 16% | 92 12% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.63 -54% | 0.59 -44% | 0.36 12% | 0.64 -56% | 0.36 12% | 0.43 -5% | |
Contrast | 1529 | 910 -40% | 1144 -25% | 1422 -7% | 753 -51% | 1408 -8% | 1140 -25% | |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 4.5 | 4.2 7% | 4.5 -0% | 6.4 -42% | 2.7 40% | 4 11% | 5.1 -13% | 5.7 -27% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 7 | 6.4 9% | 9.1 -30% | 10.9 -56% | 9.8 -40% | 6.5 7% | 9 -29% | 7.8 -11% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 5.1 | 4.6 10% | 6.4 -25% | 7.2 -41% | 1.6 69% | 3.4 33% | 6.1 -20% | 4.7 8% |
Gamma | 2.26 106% | 2.24 107% | 2.24 107% | 2.28 105% | 2.06 117% | 2.13 113% | 2.28 105% | 2.4 100% |
CCT | 7201 90% | 7157 91% | 7478 87% | 7904 82% | 6557 99% | 6774 96% | 8143 80% | 7526 86% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen | |||
Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9953 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz waargenomen. |
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
18 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 5 ms stijging | |
↘ 13 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (26.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
40 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 17 ms stijging | |
↘ 23 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (42.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 | |
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
Geekbench 4.1/4.2 | |
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
GFXBench 4.0 | |
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 | |
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde) | |
Honor 9 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
BQ Aquaris X | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Motorola Moto G5s | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde) | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
Basemark X 1.1 | |
High Quality (sorteer op waarde) | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 | |
Medium Quality (sorteer op waarde) | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei Honor 7X | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde) | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sorteer op waarde) | |
Huawei Nova 2 |
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score | |
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) | |
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60) | |
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
Honor 9 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
Huawei P smart (Chrome 64) | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
Huawei P10 Lite (Chrome 55.0.2883.91) | |
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62) | |
Nokia 6 (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
ZTE Blade V8 (Chrome 57.0.2987.132) |
* ... kleiner is beter
Honor 9 Lite | Huawei P smart | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | BQ Aquaris X | Nokia 6 | Motorola Moto G5s | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -14% | -48% | -31% | -33% | -22% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 71.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 72.36 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% | 44.21 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -39% | 62.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13% | 56.6 -21% | 62.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -13% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 82.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1% | 72.22 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -13% | 84.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% | 84.6 2% | 84.11 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% |
Random Write 4KB | 66.83 | 21.3 -68% | 9.9 -85% | 11.85 -82% | 11.34 -83% | 46.2 -31% |
Random Read 4KB | 68.39 | 66.11 -3% | 24.07 -65% | 37.47 -45% | 33.8 -51% | 40.6 -41% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 138.21 | 121.07 -12% | 51.96 -62% | 75.34 -45% | 77.06 -44% | 77.5 -44% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 269.56 | 269.36 0% | 204.45 -24% | 266.37 -1% | 273.06 1% | 259 -4% |
Asphalt 8: Airborne - high | |
Nokia 6 | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Huawei P smart | |
Honor 9 Lite |
Dead Trigger 2 - high | |
Huawei P smart | |
Huawei P10 Lite | |
Nokia 6 | |
ZTE Blade V8 | |
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos | |
Honor 9 Lite |
Honor 9 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Nokia 6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Uit / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Inactief | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Belasting |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | Nokia 6 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | Huawei P smart 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 42% | -8% | 3% | 1% | -2% | -4% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.85 | 0.52 39% | 1.12 -32% | 0.63 26% | 0.98 -15% | 0.67 21% | 0.62 27% |
Idle Average * | 2 | 1.17 41% | 2.16 -8% | 1.75 12% | 1.76 12% | 1.4 30% | 1.76 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.04 | 1.24 39% | 2.18 -7% | 1.87 8% | 1.79 12% | 1.52 25% | 1.87 8% |
Load Average * | 3.23 | 1.66 49% | 2.94 9% | 3.56 -10% | 2.89 11% | 4.56 -41% | 4.47 -38% |
Load Maximum * | 4.93 | 2.94 40% | 5.1 -3% | 5.85 -19% | 5.62 -14% | 7.05 -43% | 6.39 -30% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Honor 9 Lite 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh | Nokia 6 3000 mAh | ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh | Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh | Huawei P smart 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batterijduur | 52% | -1% | 16% | 5% | 2% | -6% | |
Reader / Idle | 965 | 1564 62% | 1695 76% | 964 0% | 1233 28% | 985 2% | |
H.264 | 622 | 917 47% | 542 -13% | 545 -12% | 645 4% | 615 -1% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 601 | 738 23% | 592 -1% | 670 11% | 700 16% | 518 -14% | 565 -6% |
Load | 253 | 449 77% | 228 -10% | 297 17% | 225 -11% | 202 -20% |
Pro
Contra
Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.
Honor is erin geslaagd om een goede middenklasse smartphone te maken: de 9 Lite. Deze maakt indruk met zijn heldere beeldscherm, fatsoenlijke dual camera's en vloeiende systeemprestaties. Daarnaast is er het fraaie design met aantrekkelijke kleuropties.
De batterijlevensduur van de smartphone is goed, maar had met betere optimalisaties nog langer kunnen zijn. Helaas heeft de 9 Lite nog steeds een Micro-USB poort en is de Wi-Fi relatief traag. Daarentegen is de LTE behoorlijk snel.
De Honor 9 Lite doet het goed met zijn heldere beeldscherm, snelle LTE en vier camera's. Gamers aan de andere kant zullen niet uit de voeten kunnen met de smartphone.
In de directe vergelijking met de Huawei P smart zijn we blij om te zien dat ons testmodel iets beter presteerde door het helderder beeldscherm en betere front camera's. Ook is de prijs iets lager. Als het idee van een smartphone met een glazen achterkant je niet aanstaat, dan kun je beter kiezen voor de P smart, welke een aluminium behuizing heeft.
Honor 9 Lite - 09-03-2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt