Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Smartphone

Florian Wimmer, 05-05-2018

Nog een. Er zit slechts 6 maanden tussen de Sony Xperia XZ Compact en z'n voorganger. Echter, er is veel veranderd: ontwerp, beeldschermgrootte en Super Slow-Motion. Lees hier of de nieuwe uitstraling slechts een vermomming van stagnaties is of dat de smartphone écht vooruitgang heeft geboekt.

Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (Xperia Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 630
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
5 inch 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixel 483 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, Audio Verbindingen: Audio output door USB Type-C poort, Card Reader: microSD tot 400 GB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Versnellingsmeter, Gyroscoop, Nabijheidssensor, Kompas, Barometer, USB Type-C 3.1
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, Netwerken: GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (800/​850/​900/​1700/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 12.1 x 135 x 65
Batterij
10.9 Wh, 2870 mAh Lithium-Ion, QuickCharge 3.0
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 19 MPix f/​2.0, Contrast detectie AF, Laser AF, fasedetectie AF, Kleurenspectrumsensor, LED flits, Video @2160p/​30fps, Video @1080p/​960fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/​2.2, Video @1080p
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo luidsprekers aan de voorkant, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, Lader, USB kabel, Headset, Audio adapter, 3D Creator, Sketch, Playstation app, AVG Protection, 24 Maanden Garantie, DLNA, Miracast, USB OTG, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD; IP65/​IP68 certified; Bandbreedte (Download/​Upload): 800Mbps/​150Mbps (LTE); SAR waardes: 0.77W/​kg (Head), 1.05W/​kg (Body), fanless
Gewicht
168 g, Voeding: 51 g
Prijs
599 Euro

 

Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
915 MBit/s ∼100% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼73% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
667 MBit/s ∼73%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
521 MBit/s ∼57% -22%
Google Pixel 2
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
287 MBit/s ∼31% -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.7 - 939, n=199)
202 MBit/s ∼22% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
Adreno 540, 835, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655 MBit/s ∼98%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼95% -3%
Apple iPhone 8
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
354 MBit/s ∼53% -46%
Google Pixel 2
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
240 MBit/s ∼36% -63%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=199)
194 MBit/s ∼29% -70%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Overzicht
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Meer
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Meer
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Lus
GPS Garmin Edge 500 – Lus
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact – Overzicht
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact – Overzicht
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact – Meer
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact – Meer
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact – Lus
GPS Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact – Lus

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
675
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
596
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
617
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
625
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 675 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 615.6 cd/m² Minimum: 6.31 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 87 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 617 cd/m²
Contrast: 1624:1 (Zwart: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.32
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
IPS, 2160x1080, 5
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
IPS, 1280x720, 4.6
Apple iPhone 8
IPS True Tone, 1334x750, 4.7
Google Pixel 2
AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5
Screen
-1%
-72%
8%
-5%
Brightness middle
617
630
2%
566
-8%
604
-2%
396
-36%
Brightness
616
632
3%
560
-9%
580
-6%
404
-34%
Brightness Distribution
87
96
10%
98
13%
91
5%
91
5%
Black Level *
0.38
0.44
-16%
0.53
-39%
0.44
-16%
Contrast
1624
1432
-12%
1068
-34%
1373
-15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
1.5
17%
4.6
-156%
1.2
33%
1.7
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.6
4.3
-19%
9.4
-161%
2.3
36%
4
-11%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.3
2.1
9%
6.5
-183%
1.6
30%
1.3
43%
Gamma
2.32 103%
2.17 111%
2.14 112%
2.25 107%
2.3 104%
CCT
6324 103%
6513 100%
8189 79%
6688 97%
6483 100%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 2336 Hz ≤ 29 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 2336 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 29 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 2336 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 10374 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
17.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5.2 ms stijging
↘ 12.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (26.2 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
39.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 12.4 ms stijging
↘ 27.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (41.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
225224 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
225663 Points ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
150208 Points ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 8
204270 Points ∼91% -9%
Google Pixel 2
166939 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 5T
172124 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 230421, n=4)
210873 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (39089 - 230421, n=296)
70951 Points ∼31% -68%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
8073 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼99% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6421 Points ∼79% -20%
Google Pixel 2
7223 Points ∼88% -11%
OnePlus 5T
6595 Points ∼81% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8069 - 8358, n=5)
8172 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2152 - 8282, n=158)
4537 Points ∼56% -44%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
9579 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
7496 Points ∼78% -22%
Google Pixel 2
8550 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 5T
7739 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (9179 - 9630, n=4)
9427 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 9630, n=323)
4661 Points ∼49% -51%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
1390 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1213 Points ∼87% -13%
Google Pixel 2
1210 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 5T
1329 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1234 - 1390, n=4)
1339 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 1682, n=398)
675 Points ∼49% -51%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
7957 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
5791 Points ∼73% -27%
Google Pixel 2
6052 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 5T
6100 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7868 - 7957, n=4)
7923 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=398)
1519 Points ∼19% -81%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
2543 Points ∼66%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼57% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1501 Points ∼39% -41%
Google Pixel 2
2942 Points ∼77% +16%
OnePlus 5T
3845 Points ∼100% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 3799, n=4)
2887 Points ∼75% +14%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=398)
1106 Points ∼29% -57%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
8435 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
5336 Points ∼63% -37%
Google Pixel 2
5918 Points ∼70% -30%
OnePlus 5T
5872 Points ∼70% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8435, n=4)
7714 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=398)
2190 Points ∼26% -74%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
3925 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼95% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2739 Points ∼70% -30%
Google Pixel 2
3360 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 5T
3678 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3614 - 4308, n=4)
3896 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=401)
1126 Points ∼29% -71%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
14073 Points ∼98%
Sony Xperia XZ2
14362 Points ∼100% +2%
Google Pixel 2
7462 Points ∼52% -47%
OnePlus 5T
8000 Points ∼56% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (14073 - 14362, n=2)
14218 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (912 - 14362, n=99)
4062 Points ∼28% -71%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
8491 Points ∼82%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8510 Points ∼82% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6541 Points ∼63% -23%
Apple iPhone 8
10380 Points ∼100% +22%
Google Pixel 2
6256 Points ∼60% -26%
OnePlus 5T
6670 Points ∼64% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8437 - 8937, n=4)
8594 Points ∼83% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=141)
4158 Points ∼40% -51%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
2442 Points ∼59%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2464 Points ∼59% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
1915 Points ∼46% -22%
Apple iPhone 8
4162 Points ∼100% +70%
Google Pixel 2
1924 Points ∼46% -21%
OnePlus 5T
1962 Points ∼47% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2442 - 2464, n=4)
2454 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=142)
1260 Points ∼30% -48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
3669 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2658 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple iPhone 8
1989 Points ∼54% -46%
Google Pixel 2
3078 Points ∼84% -16%
OnePlus 5T
3068 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2606 - 3669, n=4)
3334 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (1111 - 3669, n=250)
1546 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
5159 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
3925 Points ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone 8
2581 Points ∼50% -50%
Google Pixel 2
3974 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 5T
4016 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5122 - 5212, n=4)
5169 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=250)
1095 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
4732 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
3549 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone 8
2421 Points ∼51% -49%
Google Pixel 2
3733 Points ∼79% -21%
OnePlus 5T
3758 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4248 - 4732, n=4)
4587 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=258)
1040 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
3081 Points ∼85%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100% +18%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2675 Points ∼73% -13%
Apple iPhone 8
1774 Points ∼49% -42%
Google Pixel 2
3080 Points ∼85% 0%
OnePlus 5T
3031 Points ∼83% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3642, n=4)
3084 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1122 - 3642, n=279)
1435 Points ∼39% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
8117 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
6007 Points ∼74% -26%
Google Pixel 2
6040 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 5T
5791 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (6630 - 8252, n=4)
7780 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 8252, n=279)
1458 Points ∼18% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
5954 Points ∼93%
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
4705 Points ∼74% -21%
Google Pixel 2
4977 Points ∼78% -16%
OnePlus 5T
4816 Points ∼76% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4540 - 6378, n=4)
5794 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (71 - 6378, n=287)
1240 Points ∼19% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
36494 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼98% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
22530 Points ∼62% -38%
Apple iPhone 8
24131 Points ∼66% -34%
Google Pixel 2
20482 Points ∼56% -44%
OnePlus 5T
21348 Points ∼58% -42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (30245 - 36494, n=4)
34197 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=433)
12052 Points ∼33% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
79670 Points ∼71%
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼71% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
54415 Points ∼48% -32%
Apple iPhone 8
112424 Points ∼100% +41%
Google Pixel 2
55247 Points ∼49% -31%
OnePlus 5T
58097 Points ∼52% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 81269, n=4)
79313 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9713 - 113380, n=433)
15443 Points ∼14% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
63084 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
41396 Points ∼66% -34%
Apple iPhone 8
62006 Points ∼98% -2%
Google Pixel 2
40116 Points ∼64% -36%
OnePlus 5T
42022 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56913 - 63084, n=4)
61291 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (9580 - 64405, n=434)
13325 Points ∼21% -79%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
149 fps ∼92%
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼93% +1%
Apple iPhone 8
161.3 fps ∼100% +8%
Google Pixel 2
112 fps ∼69% -25%
OnePlus 5T
113 fps ∼70% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (149 - 151, n=5)
150 fps ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5.1 - 177, n=458)
27.1 fps ∼17% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
60 fps ∼50%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Apple iPhone 8
119.8 fps ∼100% +100%
Google Pixel 2
59 fps ∼49% -2%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (60 - 60, n=4)
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (9.7 - 120, n=461)
23.4 fps ∼20% -61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
75 fps ∼91%
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼100% +9%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
53 fps ∼65% -29%
Apple iPhone 8
70.8 fps ∼86% -6%
Google Pixel 2
52 fps ∼63% -31%
OnePlus 5T
60 fps ∼73% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (66 - 82, n=4)
74.3 fps ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=384)
14.4 fps ∼18% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
59 fps ∼52%
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼52% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
58 fps ∼51% -2%
Apple iPhone 8
114.5 fps ∼100% +94%
Google Pixel 2
54 fps ∼47% -8%
OnePlus 5T
53 fps ∼46% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 59, n=4)
58.8 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=386)
14.5 fps ∼13% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
60 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
40 fps ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 8
54 fps ∼90% -10%
Google Pixel 2
31 fps ∼52% -48%
OnePlus 5T
41 fps ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56 - 60.9, n=5)
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=250)
13 fps ∼22% -78%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
55 fps ∼50%
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼50% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
59 fps ∼54% +7%
Apple iPhone 8
109.7 fps ∼100% +99%
Google Pixel 2
40 fps ∼36% -27%
OnePlus 5T
37 fps ∼34% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 55, n=4)
54.8 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4.5 - 110, n=252)
12.8 fps ∼12% -77%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
35 fps ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
24 fps ∼69% -31%
Google Pixel 2
24 fps ∼69% -31%
OnePlus 5T
25 fps ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 35, n=4)
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 35, n=182)
9.02 fps ∼26% -74%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
33 fps ∼66%
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼66% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
50 fps ∼100% +52%
Google Pixel 2
25 fps ∼50% -24%
OnePlus 5T
23 fps ∼46% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 34, n=4)
33 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.4 - 50, n=185)
8.08 fps ∼16% -76%
AnTuTu v7
MEM (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
9485 Points ∼95%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9670 Points ∼97% +2%
Google Pixel 2
8474 Points ∼85% -11%
OnePlus 5T
9027 Points ∼90% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7910 - 12310, n=5)
10007 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 16148, n=69)
7109 Points ∼71% -25%
UX (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
55456 Points ∼97%
Sony Xperia XZ2
56292 Points ∼98% +2%
Google Pixel 2
43350 Points ∼76% -22%
OnePlus 5T
46549 Points ∼81% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (55456 - 58498, n=5)
57194 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 58218, n=69)
28757 Points ∼50% -48%
GPU (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
107080 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
106371 Points ∼99% -1%
Google Pixel 2
82858 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 5T
85868 Points ∼80% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (106371 - 107334, n=5)
107017 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 107334, n=69)
35902 Points ∼34% -66%
CPU (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
93890 Points ∼99%
Sony Xperia XZ2
94648 Points ∼100% +1%
Google Pixel 2
72848 Points ∼77% -22%
OnePlus 5T
73371 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (88739 - 94648, n=5)
92131 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 99873, n=69)
45937 Points ∼49% -51%
Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
265911 Points ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 2
207530 Points ∼78% -22%
OnePlus 5T
214815 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (265569 - 266981, n=5)
266350 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0 - 266981, n=69)
117851 Points ∼44% -56%

Legende

 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Apple iPhone 8 Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, Apple 256 GB (iPhone 8 / Plus)
 
Google Pixel 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
206.7 Points ∼100% +134%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼43% +1%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (Chrome 66)
88.444 Points ∼43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (69.8 - 89.5, n=5)
84.3 Points ∼41% -5%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
66.477 Points ∼32% -25%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
64.791 Points ∼31% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
63.675 Points ∼31% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=315)
34.8 Points ∼17% -61%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 8
34163 Points ∼100% +99%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (Chrome 66)
17131 Points ∼50%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼49% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (14491 - 17131, n=6)
16277 Points ∼48% -5%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
12509 Points ∼37% -27%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
11424 Points ∼33% -33%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
11380 Points ∼33% -34%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=452)
5025 Points ∼15% -71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=471)
11862 ms * ∼100% -394%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
3414.7 ms * ∼29% -42%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
3393.2 ms * ∼29% -41%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
3096 ms * ∼26% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2394 - 2868, n=6)
2493 ms * ∼21% -4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (Chrome 66)
2401 ms * ∼20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼20% -0%
Apple iPhone 8
730.8 ms * ∼6% +70%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone 8
359 Points ∼100% +47%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼73% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (228 - 291, n=5)
255 Points ∼71% +5%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact (Chrome 66)
244 Points ∼68%
Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62)
190 Points ∼53% -22%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)
181 Points ∼50% -26%
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84)
166 Points ∼46% -32%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=225)
96.6 Points ∼27% -60%

* ... kleiner is beter

Sony Xperia XZ2 CompactSony Xperia XZ2Sony Xperia XZ1 CompactGoogle Pixel 2OnePlus 5TAverage 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
27%
72%
7%
3%
92%
24%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
17.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76%
50.17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
193%
47.5 (17.1 - 67.2, n=17)
178%
41.9 (8.29 - 87.1, n=229)
145%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
18.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
34.25 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
90%
73.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
307%
64 (18 - 80.6, n=17)
255%
60.3 (13.5 - 96.5, n=229)
235%
Random Write 4KB
16.9
17
1%
17.13
1%
18.03
7%
20
18%
38.5 (8.77 - 152, n=22)
128%
12.9 (0.14 - 164, n=503)
-24%
Random Read 4KB
153.2
149.4
-2%
113.29
-26%
173.13
13%
138.1
-10%
137 (78.2 - 173, n=22)
-11%
33.2 (1.59 - 173, n=503)
-78%
Sequential Write 256KB
201.1
198.7
-1%
119.89
-40%
196.22
-2%
203.4
1%
194 (133 - 214, n=22)
-4%
67.5 (2.99 - 215, n=503)
-66%
Sequential Read 256KB
694.1
679.2
-2%
667.75
-4%
758.35
9%
698.7
1%
725 (529 - 819, n=22)
4%
204 (12.1 - 832, n=503)
-71%
Arena of Valor
 InstellingenWaarde
 min60 fps
 high HD60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Shadow Fight 3
 InstellingenWaarde
 high60 fps
 minimal60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Battle Bay
 InstellingenWaarde
 half resolution60 fps
 half resolution60 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Max. Belasting
 36.6 °C38.2 °C40.3 °C 
 37.3 °C38.5 °C39.8 °C 
 35.5 °C38.9 °C39.7 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.3 °C
34.4 °C36.1 °C36.6 °C
35 °C36.3 °C36.8 °C
34.1 °C36.4 °C36.7 °C
Maximum: 36.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  28.8 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.1 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.240.22532.938.63137.237.54031.733.65039.642.46328.334.58027.33010026.931.112526.730.61602430.620020.940.225020.946.731519.553.340018.560.750017.563.263017.567.180015.772.1100015.877.8125016.675.5160015.870.6200015.473.8250015.574.331501674.1400015.872.850001665.3630016.368.2800016.372.71000016.274.71250016.465.11600016.451.4SPL28.684.9N1.161.5median 16.4Sony Xperia XZ2 Compactmedian 67.1Delta2.111.835.240.432.938.837.238.231.736.239.635.428.332.927.331.426.927.326.728.2242920.933.920.94219.551.418.555.817.564.417.563.915.771.715.873.916.669.115.868.115.472.315.574.41668.115.859.2166216.365.516.372.816.270.316.463.916.452.628.681.91.150.2median 16.4Sony Xperia XZ1 Compactmedian 63.92.111.1hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.2 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.42 / 1.54 / 1.57 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.94 / 9.03 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
2870 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2700 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Google Pixel 2
2700 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-30%
-19%
4%
-14%
-22%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.42
0.72
-71%
0.58
-38%
0.54
-29%
0.99
-136%
0.63 (0.42 - 0.75, n=3)
-50%
0.849 (0.2 - 3.4, n=531)
-102%
Idle Average *
1.54
2.21
-44%
1.76
-14%
1.63
-6%
1.35
12%
2 (1.54 - 2.25, n=3)
-30%
1.685 (0.6 - 6.2, n=530)
-9%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
2.22
-41%
1.81
-15%
1.67
-6%
1.37
13%
2.02 (1.57 - 2.26, n=3)
-29%
1.916 (0.74 - 6.6, n=531)
-22%
Load Average *
4.94
4.6
7%
6.33
-28%
2.74
45%
3.25
34%
4.81 (4.6 - 4.94, n=3)
3%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=525)
20%
Load Maximum *
9.03
9.34
-3%
9.18
-2%
7.78
14%
8.56
5%
9.32 (9.03 - 9.6, n=3)
-3%
5.56 (1.2 - 14.2, n=525)
38%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
23h 40min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 32min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 23min
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact
2870 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact
2700 mAh
Apple iPhone 8
1821 mAh
Google Pixel 2
2700 mAh
Batterijduur
-3%
40%
2%
-12%
Reader / Idle
1420
1402
-1%
2655
87%
1629
15%
1457
3%
H.264
692
722
4%
866
25%
698
1%
564
-18%
WiFi v1.3
638
679
6%
736
15%
585
-8%
575
-10%
Load
203
159
-22%
266
31%
202
0%
161
-21%

Pro

+ 60-fps-gaming ready
+ Zeer snelle smartphone
+ Redelijke prijs
+ Goede beeldkwaliteit
+ 3D scans
+ IP68 certificaat
+ Stijlvolle matte afwerking
+ Uitgebreid softwarepakket
+ Nauwkeurige GPS
+ Helder beeldscherm met sterke kleuren
+ Super Slow-Motion video
+ Snelle LTE

Contra

- Bloatware
- Slechte gesprekskwaliteit op hoog volume
- Matige luidsprekers
- Langzame microSD kaartslot
- Geen 3.5 mm audiopoort
- Verminderde prestaties onder belasting
Getest: Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, testmodel geleverd door Sony Mobile Germany
Getest: Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, testmodel geleverd door Sony Mobile Germany

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Sony's kleine topmodel heeft een unieke positie. Er zijn niet veel compacte hoogwaardige smartphones, vooral niet voor €600. De kleurrijke beelden met leuke functies zoals Super Slow-Motion en 3D scans kunnen verdere redenen zijn om tot aankoop over te gaan. Gelukkig heeft de XZ2 Compact een matte afwerking en dus niet de gladde oppervlaktes van z'n grotere broer. Anderzijds zijn de verschillen miniem, afgezien van natuurlijk de meetresultaten: de maximale LTE snelheid ligt lager en de Compact versie wordt geleverd zonder QuickCharge lader, wat gezien de prijs onbegrijpelijk is. Dat is alles.

Helaas heeft de XZ2 Compact ook de minpunten van de XZ2 overgenomen, namelijk de aanzienlijke prestatiebeperkingen onder continue belasting en vreselijke gesprekskwaliteit op hoge volumes. De luidsprekers presteren ook ondermaats, vooral gezien de enorme Hi-Fi afdeling binnen Sony. Ook de lompe behuizing en het ontbreken van een 3.5 mm audiopoort spreken in het nadeel.

Dit laat de Xperia XZ2 Compact een krachtige, stijlvolle smartphone met lange looptijden, welke helaas steken laat vallen met de details. Sony had een aantal jaren geleden de beste gesprekskwaliteit en luidsprekers, wat het Japanse bedrijf zou moeten heroverwegen.

De Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact laat punten liggen met de dikke behuizing en ontbrekende 3.5 mm audiopoort. Als je daarmee kunt leven krijg je een zeer snelle smartphone voor een redelijke prijs.

De kunnen de Xperia XZ2 Compact een aanbeveling geven als je niet van plan bent veel te bellen en geen probleem hebt met het gebruiken van een adapter voor normale koptelefoons. In dat geval krijg je een bliksemsnelle telefoon met een lange batterijlevensduur.

Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact - 30-04-2018 v6
Florian Wimmer

Behuizing
93%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
93%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
47 / 60 → 78%
Gewicht
91%
Batterij
93%
Beeldscherm
91%
Gaming-performance
59 / 63 → 94%
Applicatie-performance
68 / 70 → 97%
Temperatuur
87%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 52%
Camera
87%
Gemiddelde
79%
89%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Smartphone
Florian Wimmer, 2018-05- 5 (Update: 2018-05- 5)