Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Sony Xperia E5 Smartphone

Marcus Herbrich (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 12-06-2017

Degelijke instap in de smartphonewereld. De Sony Xperia E5 toont zich in onze test een prima smartphone in de lagere prijsklasse. Lees verder om te weten te komen of het toestel zijn prijs waard is, zeker gezien de sterke concurrentie.

Sony Xperia E5 (Xperia Serie)
Processor
Mediatek MT6735 1.5 GHz
Grafische kaart
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Geheugen
1536 MB 
Beeldscherm
5 inch 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitief, LCD, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.6 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5-mm-klink, Card Reader: 200 GB opslag via micro-SD-kaart, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: afstandssensor, accelerometer, gyroscoop, hall-sensor, kompas, Mircacast
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM: 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz, 3G / UMTS: 850 / 900 / 1900 / 1700 / 2100 MHz, 4G/LTE: 700 / 800 / 850 / 1900 / 2600 / 2100 MHz , LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8,2 x 144 x 69
Batterij
2300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, HDR
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono, Toetsenbord: onscreen, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, modulaire voeding, USB-kabel, Sony UI, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR-waarde: 0,461 W/kg (body), fanless
Gewicht
147 g, Voeding: 37 g
Prijs
200 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
368 MBit/s ∼100% +361%
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
103 MBit/s ∼28% +29%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
79.9 MBit/s ∼22%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
54.1 MBit/s ∼15% -32%
Coolpad Modena 2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
44.5 MBit/s ∼12% -44%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
33.5 MBit/s ∼9% -58%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
656 MBit/s ∼100% +734%
UMI Max
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
98.8 MBit/s ∼15% +26%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
78.7 MBit/s ∼12%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
49.2 MBit/s ∼8% -37%
Coolpad Modena 2
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
48.4 MBit/s ∼7% -39%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
48.2 MBit/s ∼7% -39%
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
81.1 MBit/s ∼100%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
47.6 MBit/s ∼59%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (2.4 GHz)
50 MBit/s ∼100%
Vernee Mars
Mali-T860 MP2, Helio P10 MT6755, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38.9 MBit/s ∼78%
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Sony Xperia E5
GPS Sony Xperia E5
GPS Sony Xperia E5

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
539
cd/m²
542
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
538
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
523
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 543 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 533.6 cd/m² Minimum: 50.23 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 96 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 538 cd/m²
Contrast: 1630:1 (Zwart: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.51
Sony Xperia E5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS160
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Vernee Mars
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
UMI Max
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5
LG G6
IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7
Screen
-34%
-42%
-1%
-20%
-32%
-11%
17%
Brightness
534
351
-34%
479
-10%
339
-37%
302
-43%
420
-21%
498
-7%
611
14%
Brightness Distribution
96
93
-3%
95
-1%
85
-11%
79
-18%
94
-2%
86
-10%
89
-7%
Black Level *
0.33
0.49
-48%
0.55
-67%
0.14
58%
0.15
55%
0.33
-0%
0.23
30%
0.23
30%
Contrast
1630
731
-55%
889
-45%
2464
51%
2080
28%
1255
-23%
2270
39%
2809
72%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.7
7.1
-25%
8.3
-46%
7.1
-25%
8.2
-44%
8.1
-42%
6.9
-21%
4.5
21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
6.5
-38%
8.7
-85%
6.7
-43%
9.2
-96%
9.6
-104%
9.2
-96%
6
-28%
Gamma
2.51 96%
2.12 113%
2.08 115%
2.47 97%
2.29 105%
2 120%
2.38 101%
2.27 106%
CCT
7264 89%
8166 80%
9034 72%
7711 84%
9017 72%
7754 84%
8687 75%
7996 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.74
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.05

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 59 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 4338 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
38.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 23.6 ms stijging
↘ 15.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (27.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
42.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 19.2 ms stijging
↘ 23.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (43.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
32477 Points ∼14%
LG K8 2017
30924 Points ∼14% -5%
Gigaset GS160
28459 Points ∼12% -12%
Vernee Mars
51008 Points ∼22% +57%
Coolpad Modena 2
24875 Points ∼11% -23%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
23822 Points ∼10% -27%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
30676 Points ∼13% -6%
UMI Max
49057 Points ∼22% +51%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
45.56 MB/s ∼52%
LG K8 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
52.23 MB/s ∼60% +15%
Gigaset GS160 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
19.19 MB/s ∼22% -58%
Vernee Mars
24 MB/s ∼28% -47%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.25 MB/s ∼21% -60%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
12.62 MB/s ∼14% -72%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
16.17 MB/s ∼19% -65%
UMI Max (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
18.07 MB/s ∼21% -60%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
65.03 MB/s ∼67%
LG K8 2017 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
78.55 MB/s ∼81% +21%
Gigaset GS160 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
30.71 MB/s ∼32% -53%
Vernee Mars
44.5 MB/s ∼46% -32%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
35.59 MB/s ∼37% -45%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
22.77 MB/s ∼24% -65%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
27.68 MB/s ∼29% -57%
UMI Max (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
36.64 MB/s ∼38% -44%
Random Write 4KB (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
9.84 MB/s ∼6%
LG K8 2017
12.5 MB/s ∼8% +27%
Gigaset GS160
6.8 MB/s ∼4% -31%
Vernee Mars
15.77 MB/s ∼10% +60%
Coolpad Modena 2
6.79 MB/s ∼4% -31%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.26 MB/s ∼5% -16%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
7.95 MB/s ∼5% -19%
UMI Max
10.91 MB/s ∼7% +11%
Random Read 4KB (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
26.04 MB/s ∼15%
LG K8 2017
41.6 MB/s ∼24% +60%
Gigaset GS160
18.5 MB/s ∼11% -29%
Vernee Mars
21.66 MB/s ∼13% -17%
Coolpad Modena 2
23.03 MB/s ∼13% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
18.24 MB/s ∼11% -30%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
20.25 MB/s ∼12% -22%
UMI Max
26.66 MB/s ∼15% +2%
Sequential Write 256KB (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
83.09 MB/s ∼40%
LG K8 2017
84.6 MB/s ∼41% +2%
Gigaset GS160
46.6 MB/s ∼23% -44%
Vernee Mars
71.58 MB/s ∼35% -14%
Coolpad Modena 2
42.56 MB/s ∼21% -49%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
70.33 MB/s ∼34% -15%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
39.51 MB/s ∼19% -52%
UMI Max
69.5 MB/s ∼34% -16%
Sequential Read 256KB (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
209.69 MB/s ∼26%
LG K8 2017
270.8 MB/s ∼34% +29%
Gigaset GS160
200.5 MB/s ∼25% -4%
Vernee Mars
255.87 MB/s ∼32% +22%
Coolpad Modena 2
147.04 MB/s ∼19% -30%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
187.34 MB/s ∼24% -11%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
178.65 MB/s ∼23% -15%
UMI Max
257.9 MB/s ∼33% +23%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS160
1453 Points ∼5%
Vernee Mars
2903 Points ∼11%
Coolpad Modena 2
1274 Points ∼5%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1588 Points ∼6%
UMI Max
2701 Points ∼10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Gigaset GS160
518 Points ∼9%
Vernee Mars
729 Points ∼13%
Coolpad Modena 2
459 Points ∼8%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
572 Points ∼10%
UMI Max
734 Points ∼13%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
1527 Points ∼10%
LG K8 2017
1737 Points ∼12% +14%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
556 Points ∼12%
LG K8 2017
642 Points ∼13% +15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
835 Points ∼28%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Vernee Mars
1338 Points ∼44% +60%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
609 Points ∼20% -27%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
882 Points ∼29% +6%
UMI Max
1247 Points ∼41% +49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
100 Points ∼2%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Vernee Mars
356 Points ∼7% +256%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
65 Points ∼1% -35%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
102 Points ∼2% +2%
UMI Max
354 Points ∼7% +254%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
124 Points ∼3%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Vernee Mars
425 Points ∼11% +243%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
81 Points ∼2% -35%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
127 Points ∼3% +2%
UMI Max
421 Points ∼11% +240%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
817 Points ∼28%
LG K8 2017
622 Points ∼21% -24%
Vernee Mars
1100 Points ∼38% +35%
Coolpad Modena 2
621 Points ∼21% -24%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
618 Points ∼21% -24%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
831 Points ∼28% +2%
UMI Max
1239 Points ∼42% +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
175 Points ∼2%
LG K8 2017
31 Points ∼0% -82%
Vernee Mars
523 Points ∼7% +199%
Coolpad Modena 2
106 Points ∼1% -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
101 Points ∼1% -42%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
172 Points ∼2% -2%
UMI Max
521 Points ∼7% +198%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
212 Points ∼4%
LG K8 2017
39 Points ∼1% -82%
Vernee Mars
602 Points ∼12% +184%
Coolpad Modena 2
130 Points ∼3% -39%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
124 Points ∼2% -42%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
209 Points ∼4% -1%
UMI Max
598 Points ∼12% +182%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
9349 Points ∼14%
LG K8 2017
6656 Points ∼10% -29%
Gigaset GS160
7881 Points ∼11% -16%
Vernee Mars
10762 Points ∼16% +15%
Coolpad Modena 2
7061 Points ∼10% -24%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
7026 Points ∼10% -25%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
9768 Points ∼14% +4%
UMI Max
12239 Points ∼18% +31%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
4615 Points ∼1%
LG K8 2017
2546 Points ∼1% -45%
Gigaset GS160
3291 Points ∼1% -29%
Vernee Mars
10685 Points ∼2% +132%
Coolpad Modena 2
2789 Points ∼1% -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2645 Points ∼1% -43%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4333 Points ∼1% -6%
UMI Max
10612 Points ∼2% +130%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
5200 Points ∼3%
LG K8 2017
2951 Points ∼1% -43%
Gigaset GS160
3780 Points ∼2% -27%
Vernee Mars
10702 Points ∼5% +106%
Coolpad Modena 2
3222 Points ∼2% -38%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3070 Points ∼2% -41%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4944 Points ∼3% -5%
UMI Max
10942 Points ∼6% +110%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
8.4 fps ∼1%
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps ∼0% -60%
Gigaset GS160
6 fps ∼0% -29%
Vernee Mars
17 fps ∼1% +102%
Coolpad Modena 2
5 fps ∼0% -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
4.9 fps ∼0% -42%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
14 fps ∼1% +67%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼1% +102%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
15 fps ∼3%
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps ∼1% -57%
Gigaset GS160
11 fps ∼2% -27%
Vernee Mars
18 fps ∼4% +20%
Coolpad Modena 2
8.9 fps ∼2% -41%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
8.2 fps ∼2% -45%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
8.4 fps ∼2% -44%
UMI Max
17 fps ∼4% +13%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
3 fps ∼1%
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps ∼0% -57%
Gigaset GS160
2.1 fps ∼0% -30%
Vernee Mars
7.1 fps ∼1% +137%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.8 fps ∼0% -40%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
3.4 fps ∼1% +13%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
6 fps ∼1% +100%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼1% +137%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
6 fps ∼3%
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps ∼2% -38%
Gigaset GS160
4.7 fps ∼2% -22%
Vernee Mars
7.6 fps ∼3% +27%
Coolpad Modena 2
4 fps ∼2% -33%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.8 fps ∼1% -70%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3 fps ∼1% -50%
UMI Max
7.1 fps ∼3% +18%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
1.9 fps ∼0%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS160
1.4 fps ∼0% -26%
Vernee Mars
4.8 fps ∼1% +153%
Coolpad Modena 2
2.9 fps ∼1% +53%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2.5 fps ∼1% +32%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% +132%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼1% +147%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
3.4 fps ∼2%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS160
3.4 fps ∼2% 0%
Vernee Mars
5.1 fps ∼3% +50%
Coolpad Modena 2
1.2 fps ∼1% -65%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
1.2 fps ∼1% -65%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1.9 fps ∼1% -44%
UMI Max
4.7 fps ∼3% +38%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
3817 Points ∼46%
LG K8 2017
4673 Points ∼56% +22%
Gigaset GS160
2563 Points ∼31% -33%
Vernee Mars
4554 Points ∼55% +19%
Coolpad Modena 2
3119 Points ∼38% -18%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
3813 Points ∼46% 0%
UMI Max
4485 Points ∼54% +18%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
639 Points ∼41%
LG K8 2017
616 Points ∼40% -4%
Gigaset GS160
9 Points ∼1% -99%
Vernee Mars
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Coolpad Modena 2
565 Points ∼37% -12%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
592 Points ∼38% -7%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
10 Points ∼1% -98%
UMI Max
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
280 Points ∼3%
LG K8 2017
436 Points ∼5% +56%
Gigaset GS160
208 Points ∼2% -26%
Vernee Mars
665 Points ∼8% +138%
Coolpad Modena 2
178 Points ∼2% -36%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
174 Points ∼2% -38%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
286 Points ∼3% +2%
UMI Max
666 Points ∼8% +138%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
552 Points ∼13%
LG K8 2017
634 Points ∼15% +15%
Gigaset GS160
497 Points ∼12% -10%
Vernee Mars
1005 Points ∼23% +82%
Coolpad Modena 2
598 Points ∼14% +8%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
487 Points ∼11% -12%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
450 Points ∼11% -18%
UMI Max
998 Points ∼23% +81%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
1091 Points ∼17%
LG K8 2017
1191 Points ∼18% +9%
Gigaset GS160
1029 Points ∼16% -6%
Vernee Mars
2291 Points ∼35% +110%
Coolpad Modena 2
909 Points ∼14% -17%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
801 Points ∼12% -27%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
1090 Points ∼17% 0%
UMI Max
2123 Points ∼32% +95%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5
567 Points ∼15%
LG K8 2017
371 Points ∼10% -35%
Gigaset GS160
178 Points ∼5% -69%
Vernee Mars
348 Points ∼9% -39%
Coolpad Modena 2
483 Points ∼13% -15%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
448 Points ∼12% -21%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
192 Points ∼5% -66%
UMI Max
341 Points ∼9% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58)
17.885 Points ∼0%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
17.124 Points ∼0% -4%
Gigaset GS160 (Chrome 55)
14.428 Points ∼0% -19%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
27.099 Points ∼0% +52%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
13.15 Points ∼0% -26%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
12.729 Points ∼0% -29%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (Chrome Version 52)
18.028 Points ∼0% +1%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
25.502 Points ∼0% +43%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58)
2910 Points ∼6%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
3052 Points ∼6% +5%
Gigaset GS160 (Chrome 55)
2493 Points ∼5% -14%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
4073 Points ∼8% +40%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
1975 Points ∼4% -32%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
1910 Points ∼4% -34%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (die Abstrahlung von blauem Licht)
2697 Points ∼5% -7%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
4231 Points ∼9% +45%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Sony Xperia E5 (Chrome Version 58)
13232.4 ms * ∼22%
LG K8 2017 (Chrome 57)
10742 ms * ∼18% +19%
Gigaset GS160 (Chrome 55)
13907.4 ms * ∼23% -5%
Vernee Mars (Chrome Version 54)
9376.1 ms * ∼16% +29%
Coolpad Modena 2 (Chrome Version 54)
19647.2 ms * ∼33% -48%
ZTE Blade V7 Lite (Chrome Version 50)
19234.4 ms * ∼32% -45%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus (die Abstrahlung von blauem Licht)
12910 ms * ∼22% +2%
UMI Max (Chrome Version 54)
9795.6 ms * ∼16% +26%

Legende

 
Sony Xperia E5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Vernee Mars Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Coolpad Modena 2 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V7 Lite Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Liquid Zest Plus Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
UMI Max Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 44 °C41.1 °C35.3 °C 
 42.6 °C43.3 °C36.9 °C 
 41.8 °C43 °C35.5 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Gemiddelde: 40.4 °C
35.9 °C38.7 °C45.6 °C
34.4 °C41 °C45.6 °C
34 °C39.2 °C44.2 °C
Maximum: 45.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.8 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  30.8 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.72525.433.33125.332.14032.926.45033.626.26331.633.38028.430.51002734.312520.832.61602231.520021.336.625020.841.731521.244.640019.449.750019.554.863017.761.480017.966.1100017.865.9125017.366.9160017.463.6200016.758.6250017.263.3315018.265.9400017.969.1500017.669.2630017.764.7800017.858.51000017.952.91250018.140.21600018.229.5SPL3076.5N1.337.3median 17.9Sony Xperia E5median 58.5Delta1.312.831.633.725.428.625.332.732.930.233.643.231.633.628.425.62722.920.822.52226.321.325.520.831.921.241.119.448.519.559.317.76517.96917.875.517.375.617.474.216.775.817.273.918.272.517.972.317.675.917.775.817.876.217.976.618.16618.249.23086.11.363.5median 17.9Coolpad Modena 2median 691.316.631.644.425.43425.335.932.931.733.630.931.637.828.424.92726.320.827.42225.421.325.620.826.521.229.619.437.119.545.217.754.417.965.517.876.617.378.917.477.716.774.417.273.418.272.417.97017.668.517.768.517.871.917.969.518.163.818.255.93085.61.355median 17.9LG K8 2017median 65.51.317.4hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Sony Xperia E5 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Coolpad Modena 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.12 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 40.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

LG K8 2017 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 38.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (35.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.34 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.03 / 2.06 / 2.12 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.01 / 5.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Power Consumption
28%
19%
2%
8%
34%
12%
27%
Idle Minimum *
1.03
0.65
37%
0.56
46%
1.02
1%
0.64
38%
0.63
39%
0.83
19%
1.02
1%
Idle Average *
2.06
1.6
22%
1.7
17%
1.69
18%
1.96
5%
1.37
33%
2.06
-0%
1.53
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.12
1.62
24%
1.75
17%
1.82
14%
1.98
7%
1.71
19%
2.08
2%
1.62
24%
Load Average *
5.01
2.97
41%
4.17
17%
4.39
12%
4.99
-0%
2.82
44%
3.53
30%
2.91
42%
Load Maximum *
5.04
4.34
14%
5.07
-1%
6.79
-35%
5.48
-9%
3.36
33%
4.49
11%
2.93
42%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Surfen met WLAN v1.3
7h 02min
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
Vernee Mars
3000 mAh
Coolpad Modena 2
2500 mAh
ZTE Blade V7 Lite
2500 mAh
Acer Liquid Zest Plus
5000 mAh
UMI Max
4000 mAh
Batterijduur
WiFi v1.3
422
594
41%
615
46%
427
1%
518
23%
517
23%
815
93%
588
39%

Pro

+ helder IPS-paneel
+ nauwkeurige GPS-module
+ prestaties (gezien het SoC)
+ NFC
+ design en bouwkwaliteit
+ snelle SD-kaartsleuf

Contra

- trage SoC
- plaatselijk hoge warmteontwikkeling
- luidspreker
- batterijduur (in vergelijking met de voorganger)
- camera
Onder de loep: Sony Xperia E5. Testtoestel via notebooksbilliger.de
Onder de loep: Sony Xperia E5. Testtoestel via notebooksbilliger.de

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Het instapmodel van Sony wist in onze test punten te scoren met zijn contrastrijke IPS HD-paneel en handige bediening. De Xperia E5 heeft een prima bouwkwaliteit, al voelt de plastic behuizing redelijk dun aan. De concurrentie gebruikt materialen zoals glas (UHANS S1) of metaal (Vernee Mars) en maakt een duidelijk hoogwaardigere indruk.

De combinatie van een minder performance MediaTek quad-core SoC en 1,5 GB RAM zorgt voor een (verrassend) vlot systeem bij het uitvoeren van alledaagse taken en dankzij de relatief snelle 16 GB eMMC-opslag worden apps zonder grote vertragingen geladen. Daarnaast is de GPS-module van de Xperia E5 erg nauwkeurig voor zijn prijsklasse.

Helaas moeten we vaststellen dat de batterijduur van de Sony-smartphone door het hoge energieverbruik (en warmteontwikkeling) eerder ondergemiddeld is in vergelijking met de concurrentie.

De Xperia E5 is een oerdegelijke budget-smartphone. Het chique glazen design van de duurdere Xperia-smartphones waar we Sony van kennen, zou het toestel echter veel goed gedaan hebben en een unieke feature kunnen bieden.

Sony Xperia E5 - 06-06-2017 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
80%
Toetsenbord
60 / 75 → 79%
Aanwijsapparaat
84%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
41 / 60 → 68%
Gewicht
93%
Batterij
89%
Beeldscherm
83%
Gaming-performance
8 / 63 → 13%
Applicatie-performance
34 / 70 → 49%
Temperatuur
86%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
48 / 91 → 52%
Camera
48%
Gemiddelde
66%
77%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Sony Xperia E5 Smartphone
Marcus Herbrich, 2017-06-12 (Update: 2017-06-12)