Kort testrapport HTC U11 Plus Smartphone

Name: Kort testrapport HTC U11 Plus Smartphone
Item: HTC U11 Plus
Rating: 89
Author: Daniel Schmidt

Daniel Schmidt (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 07-03-2018

Hip. De HTC U11 Plus is een ongeveer een jaar na de U11 eindelijk verschenen en heeft erg gelijkaardige specificaties. De opslagruimte is uitgebreid en het nieuwe Super LCD-scherm heeft nu een hippe 2:1 schermverhouding. Daarnaast werd de batterij ook aanzienlijk vergroot. Lees verder om te weten te komen hoe de smartphone het ervan afbracht in onze tests.

Testtoestel voorzien door notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Formaat Vergelijking

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000 Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	939 MBit/s ∼100% +172%
LG V30 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	657 MBit/s ∼70% +90%
HTC U11 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	394 MBit/s ∼42% +14%
OnePlus 5T Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	386 MBit/s ∼41% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	368 MBit/s ∼39% +7%
HTC U11 Plus Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 MBit/s ∼37%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	338 MBit/s ∼36% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	239 MBit/s ∼25% -31%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG V30 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	703 MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Mali-G71 MP20, 8895 Octa, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	656 MBit/s ∼93% +13%
OnePlus 5T Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	650 MBit/s ∼92% +11%
HTC U11 Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	639 MBit/s ∼91% +10%
HTC U11 Plus Adreno 540, 835, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	583 MBit/s ∼83%
Apple iPhone X A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	456 MBit/s ∼65% -22%
Google Pixel 2 XL Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	279 MBit/s ∼40% -52%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	225 MBit/s ∼32% -61%

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden

klik om beelden te laden


334 cd/m²	353 cd/m²	354 cd/m²
343 cd/m²	361 cd/m²	368 cd/m²
359 cd/m²	360 cd/m²	371 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 371 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 355.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.73 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 361 cd/m²
Contrast: 1719:1 (Zwart: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.21

	HTC U11 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6	HTC U11 Super LCD5, 2560x1440, 5.5	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2	Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6	Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8	LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6	OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6.01	Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6
Screen		-8%	32%	30%	40%	-51%	7%	-9%
Brightness middle	361	482 34%	560 55%	629 74%	600 66%	432 20%	425 18%	415 15%
Brightness	356	472 33%	562 58%	636 79%	606 70%	428 20%	423 19%	420 18%
Brightness Distribution	90	90 0%	93 3%	94 4%	94 4%	87 -3%	92 2%	87 -3%
Black Level *	0.21	0.33 -57%
Contrast	1719	1461 -15%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.5	3.2 -28%	1.7 32%	1.7 32%	1.2 52%	4.18 -67%	2.1 16%	2.7 -8%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	5.3	5.4 -2%	3.4 36%	3.6 32%	3 43%	8.53 -61%	3.4 36%	4.3 19%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	1.7	2.2 -29%	1.6 6%	2.4 -41%	1.6 6%	5.3 -212%	2.5 -47%	3.3 -94%
Gamma	2.21 ^109%	2.22 ^108%	2.13 ^113%	2.15 ^112%	2.23 ^108%	2.33 ^103%	2.32 ^103%	2.36 ^102%
CCT	6580 ^99%	6581 ^99%	6435 ^101%	6337 ^103%	6707 ^97%	7487 ^87%	6455 ^101%	6787 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			81.57
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			99.87

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen

9615 Hz

≤ 33 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 9615 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 33 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 9615 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 53 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
33.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 18.8 ms stijging
33.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 14.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (25.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
36.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 14.8 ms stijging
36.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 21.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 30 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	183057 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	177341 Points ∼77% -3%
Apple iPhone X	197851 Points ∼86% +8%
LG V30	173749 Points ∼75% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL	166151 Points ∼72% -9%
OnePlus 5T	172124 Points ∼75% -6%
HTC U11	175032 Points ∼76% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	165382 Points ∼72% -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	179595 Points ∼78% -2%

PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	6695 Points ∼65%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	6932 Points ∼67% +4%
LG V30	5603 Points ∼54% -16%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6994 Points ∼68% +4%
OnePlus 5T	6595 Points ∼64% -1%
HTC U11	6828 Points ∼66% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5195 Points ∼50% -22%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	6998 Points ∼68% +5%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	7964 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	8439 Points ∼82% +6%
LG V30	6854 Points ∼67% -14%
Google Pixel 2 XL	8258 Points ∼80% +4%
OnePlus 5T	7739 Points ∼75% -3%
HTC U11	8295 Points ∼81% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5830 Points ∼57% -27%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	8553 Points ∼83% +7%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	1159 Points ∼68%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	1234 Points ∼73% +6%
Apple iPhone X	1682 Points ∼99% +45%
LG V30	1009 Points ∼59% -13%
Google Pixel 2 XL	1186 Points ∼70% +2%
OnePlus 5T	1329 Points ∼78% +15%
HTC U11	1221 Points ∼72% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1163 Points ∼69% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	1300 Points ∼77% +12%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	6086 Points ∼66%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	3657 Points ∼40% -40%
Apple iPhone X	9248 Points ∼100% +52%
LG V30	5949 Points ∼64% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6142 Points ∼66% +1%
OnePlus 5T	6100 Points ∼66% 0%
HTC U11	5976 Points ∼65% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6126 Points ∼66% +1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	6144 Points ∼66% +1%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	3376 Points ∼70%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	4142 Points ∼86% +23%
Apple iPhone X	1219 Points ∼25% -64%
LG V30	2091 Points ∼44% -38%
Google Pixel 2 XL	2927 Points ∼61% -13%
OnePlus 5T	3845 Points ∼80% +14%
HTC U11	2085 Points ∼43% -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3135 Points ∼65% -7%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	3652 Points ∼76% +8%
System (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	5926 Points ∼58%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	5244 Points ∼51% -12%
Apple iPhone X	10281 Points ∼100% +73%
LG V30	4238 Points ∼41% -28%
Google Pixel 2 XL	5914 Points ∼58% 0%
OnePlus 5T	5872 Points ∼57% -1%
HTC U11	5570 Points ∼54% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5319 Points ∼52% -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	5918 Points ∼58% 0%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	3447 Points ∼80%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	3147 Points ∼73% -9%
Apple iPhone X	3737 Points ∼87% +8%
LG V30	2702 Points ∼63% -22%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3351 Points ∼78% -3%
OnePlus 5T	3678 Points ∼85% +7%
HTC U11	3034 Points ∼70% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3301 Points ∼77% -4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	3625 Points ∼84% +5%

Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	7946 Points ∼55%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	8572 Points ∼59% +8%
LG V30	8016 Points ∼56% +1%
Google Pixel 2 XL	7568 Points ∼52% -5%
OnePlus 5T	8000 Points ∼55% +1%
HTC U11	8281 Points ∼57% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	8295 Points ∼58% +4%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	6771 Points ∼19%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	6792 Points ∼19% 0%
Apple iPhone X	10255 Points ∼28% +51%
LG V30	6078 Points ∼17% -10%
Google Pixel 2 XL	6253 Points ∼17% -8%
OnePlus 5T	6670 Points ∼18% -1%
HTC U11	6443 Points ∼18% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6695 Points ∼18% -1%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	6711 Points ∼19% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	1935 Points ∼33%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	1898 Points ∼32% -2%
Apple iPhone X	4265 Points ∼72% +120%
LG V30	1900 Points ∼32% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL	1916 Points ∼32% -1%
OnePlus 5T	1962 Points ∼33% +1%
HTC U11	1906 Points ∼32% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2015 Points ∼34% +4%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	1911 Points ∼32% -1%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	3049 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	2871 Points ∼78% -6%
Apple iPhone X	2361 Points ∼64% -23%
LG V30	2931 Points ∼80% -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3028 Points ∼83% -1%
OnePlus 5T	3068 Points ∼84% +1%
HTC U11	2841 Points ∼77% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2466 Points ∼67% -19%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	2986 Points ∼81% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	3987 Points ∼74%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	2844 Points ∼53% -29%
Apple iPhone X	3463 Points ∼64% -13%
LG V30	3903 Points ∼72% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3872 Points ∼72% -3%
OnePlus 5T	4016 Points ∼75% +1%
HTC U11	3883 Points ∼72% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3479 Points ∼65% -13%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	3991 Points ∼74% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	3732 Points ∼79%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	2850 Points ∼60% -24%
Apple iPhone X	3138 Points ∼66% -16%
LG V30	3635 Points ∼77% -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL	3646 Points ∼77% -2%
OnePlus 5T	3758 Points ∼79% +1%
HTC U11	3590 Points ∼76% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3188 Points ∼67% -15%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	3713 Points ∼78% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	3071 Points ∼84%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	2896 Points ∼80% -6%
LG V30	2808 Points ∼77% -9%
Google Pixel 2 XL	2995 Points ∼82% -2%
OnePlus 5T	3031 Points ∼83% -1%
HTC U11	2832 Points ∼78% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2465 Points ∼68% -20%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	3071 Points ∼84% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	6060 Points ∼73%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	3353 Points ∼40% -45%
LG V30	5895 Points ∼71% -3%
Google Pixel 2 XL	5856 Points ∼70% -3%
OnePlus 5T	5791 Points ∼70% -4%
HTC U11	5877 Points ∼71% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	4786 Points ∼58% -21%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	6035 Points ∼73% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	4982 Points ∼78%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	3239 Points ∼51% -35%
LG V30	4738 Points ∼74% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL	4831 Points ∼76% -3%
OnePlus 5T	4816 Points ∼76% -3%
HTC U11	4744 Points ∼74% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3958 Points ∼62% -21%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	4969 Points ∼78% 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	20820 Points ∼26%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	22629 Points ∼29% +9%
Apple iPhone X	25633 Points ∼32% +23%
LG V30	14601 Points ∼18% -30%
Google Pixel 2 XL	20233 Points ∼26% -3%
OnePlus 5T	21348 Points ∼27% +3%
HTC U11	20140 Points ∼25% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	20892 Points ∼26% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	21239 Points ∼27% +2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	58307 Points ∼12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	34008 Points ∼7% -42%
Apple iPhone X	112489 Points ∼24% +93%
LG V30	55271 Points ∼12% -5%
Google Pixel 2 XL	54156 Points ∼11% -7%
OnePlus 5T	58097 Points ∼12% 0%
HTC U11	55725 Points ∼12% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	33077 Points ∼7% -43%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	55485 Points ∼12% -5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	41644 Points ∼20%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	30590 Points ∼15% -27%
Apple iPhone X	64169 Points ∼31% +54%
LG V30	34139 Points ∼16% -18%
Google Pixel 2 XL	39456 Points ∼19% -5%
OnePlus 5T	42022 Points ∼20% +1%
HTC U11	40014 Points ∼19% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	29282 Points ∼14% -30%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	40848 Points ∼20% -2%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	113 fps ∼7%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	112 fps ∼7% -1%
Apple iPhone X	177.4 fps ∼10% +57%
LG V30	113 fps ∼7% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL	112 fps ∼7% -1%
OnePlus 5T	113 fps ∼7% 0%
HTC U11	91 fps ∼5% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	104 fps ∼6% -8%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	105 fps ∼6% -7%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	60 fps ∼13%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	60 fps ∼13% 0%
Apple iPhone X	59.4 fps ∼13% -1%
LG V30	60 fps ∼13% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL	59 fps ∼13% -2%
OnePlus 5T	60 fps ∼13% 0%
HTC U11	58 fps ∼13% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	58 fps ∼13% -3%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	60 fps ∼13% 0%

GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	60 fps ∼11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	54 fps ∼10% -10%
Apple iPhone X	88.2 fps ∼16% +47%
LG V30	59 fps ∼11% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL	59 fps ∼11% -2%
OnePlus 5T	60 fps ∼11% 0%
HTC U11	51 fps ∼9% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	50 fps ∼9% -17%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	54 fps ∼10% -10%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	35 fps ∼10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	56 fps ∼15% +60%
Apple iPhone X	58.5 fps ∼16% +67%
LG V30	35 fps ∼10% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL	35 fps ∼10% 0%
OnePlus 5T	53 fps ∼15% +51%
HTC U11	29 fps ∼8% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	38 fps ∼10% +9%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	36 fps ∼10% +3%

GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	41 fps ∼8%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	37 fps ∼7% -10%
Apple iPhone X	48.9 fps ∼9% +19%
LG V30	40 fps ∼7% -2%
Google Pixel 2 XL	41 fps ∼8% 0%
OnePlus 5T	41 fps ∼8% 0%
HTC U11	33 fps ∼6% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	42 fps ∼8% +2%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	40 fps ∼7% -2%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	21 fps ∼12%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	38 fps ∼22% +81%
Apple iPhone X	44.1 fps ∼25% +110%
LG V30	19 fps ∼11% -10%
Google Pixel 2 XL	20 fps ∼11% -5%
OnePlus 5T	37 fps ∼21% +76%
HTC U11	15 fps ∼9% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	23 fps ∼13% +10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	22 fps ∼13% +5%

GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	25 fps ∼6%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	21 fps ∼5% -16%
Apple iPhone X	31.8 fps ∼8% +27%
LG V30	24 fps ∼6% -4%
Google Pixel 2 XL	24 fps ∼6% -4%
OnePlus 5T	25 fps ∼6% 0%
HTC U11	24 fps ∼6% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25 fps ∼6% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	25 fps ∼6% 0%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	13 fps ∼11%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	22 fps ∼19% +69%
Apple iPhone X	27.7 fps ∼24% +113%
LG V30	13 fps ∼11% 0%
Google Pixel 2 XL	13 fps ∼11% 0%
OnePlus 5T	23 fps ∼20% +77%
HTC U11	13 fps ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	13 fps ∼11% 0%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force	15 fps ∼13% +15%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	38.71 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	21.49 fps ∼56% -44%
Google Pixel 2 XL	37.71 fps ∼97% -3%
HTC U11	36.58 fps ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25.06 fps ∼65% -35%

Basemark X 1.1
High Quality (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	25922 Points ∼59%
HTC U11	38752 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	42335 Points ∼96%
Medium Quality (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	39033 Points ∼87%
HTC U11	44696 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	41901 Points ∼93%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sorteer op waarde)
HTC U11 Plus	868 Points ∼46%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	788 Points ∼42% -9%
Apple iPhone X	1702 Points ∼91% +96%
Google Pixel 2 XL	853 Points ∼46% -2%
HTC U11	812 Points ∼43% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1280 Points ∼68% +47%

Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei Mate 10 Pro	59.7 fps ∼97%
HTC U11	60 fps ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	59.7 fps ∼97%

Legende

HTC U11 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei Mate 10 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash

LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Google Pixel 2 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

OnePlus 5T Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Motorola Moto Z2 Force Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)	224 Points ∼100% +245%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	69.51 Points ∼31% +7%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)	66.689 Points ∼30% +3%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	66.477 Points ∼30% +2%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)	64.948 Points ∼29%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	64.709 Points ∼29% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	62.198 Points ∼28% -4%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)	56.63 Points ∼25% -13%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	52.9 Points ∼24% -19%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)	35255 Points ∼100% +205%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	14050 Points ∼40% +22%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)	12929 Points ∼37% +12%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	12509 Points ∼35% +8%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	11781 Points ∼33% +2%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)	11553 Points ∼33%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	11308 Points ∼32% -2%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	10506 Points ∼30% -9%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)	10406 Points ∼30% -10%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	3630 ms * ∼100% -16%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)	3590.6 ms * ∼99% -15%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	3434.1 ms * ∼95% -10%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)	3175.3 ms * ∼87% -1%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)	3131.6 ms * ∼86%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	3096 ms * ∼85% +1%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	2760.3 ms * ∼76% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	2236.7 ms * ∼62% +29%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)	718 ms * ∼20% +77%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)	354 Points ∼100% +98%
Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62)	194 Points ∼55% +8%
OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63)	181 Points ∼51% +1%
HTC U11 Plus (Chrome 63)	179 Points ∼51%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	162 Points ∼46% -9%
Motorola Moto Z2 Force (Chrome 63.0.3239.111)	161 Points ∼45% -10%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61)	158 Points ∼45% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	154 Points ∼44% -14%
LG V30 (Chrome 62)	138 Points ∼39% -23%

* ... kleiner is beter

	HTC U11 Plus	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	LG V30	Motorola Moto Z2 Force	Honor View 10
AndroBench 3-5		-14%	-29%	-4%	11%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	51.26 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	57.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 12%	47.2 -8%	54.67 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%	65.06 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	75.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	71.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -6%	62.8 -17%	77.37 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 3%	81 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 7%
Random Write 4KB	135.69	15.27 -89%	10.21 -92%	78.62 -42%	160 18%
Random Read 4KB	132.39	127.18 -4%	78.17 -41%	148.76 12%	144.3 9%
Sequential Write 256KB	207.94	194.18 -7%	193.22 -7%	213.61 3%	194.3 -7%
Sequential Read 256KB	728.37	787.6 8%	669.48 -8%	696.35 -4%	810.3 11%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Instellingen	Waarde
	high	29 fps
	very low	30 fps

... in vergelijking

Dead Trigger 2
	Instellingen	Waarde
	high	59 fps

... in vergelijking

Max. Belasting

Inactief


36.8 °C	35.9 °C	35.7 °C
36.1 °C	36.5 °C	35.6 °C
35.9 °C	35.7 °C	34.1 °C

Maximum: 36.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.8 °C


31.9 °C	33.3 °C	34.1 °C
31.6 °C	32.5 °C	36.1 °C
31.2 °C	32.2 °C	34.4 °C

Maximum: 36.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 33 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 29 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

HTC U11 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.03 / 0.14 Watt
Inactief	0.51 / 1.62 / 1.87 Watt
Belasting	3.92 / 8.27 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh	HTC U11 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh	Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh	Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh
Power Consumption		-16%	10%	6%	-32%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	0.51	0.73 -43%	0.68 -33%	0.58 -14%	1.28 -151%	0.85 -67%
Idle Average *	1.62	1.96 -21%	1.13 30%	1.44 11%	1.87 -15%	1.15 29%
Idle Maximum *	1.87	1.98 -6%	1.16 38%	1.53 18%	1.89 -1%	1.23 34%
Load Average *	3.92	4.82 -23%	4.69 -20%	3.17 19%	3.73 5%	4.12 -5%
Load Maximum *	8.27	7.15 14%	5.24 37%	8.54 -3%	8.08 2%	8.42 -2%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		27h 05min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 63)		10h 07min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 11min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		4h 51min

	HTC U11 Plus 3930 mAh	HTC U11 3000 mAh	Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh	OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	Motorola Moto Z2 Force 2730 mAh
Batterijduur		-19%	33%	-15%	11%	8%	11%
Reader / Idle	1625	1250 -23%	1744 7%	1292 -20%	1754 8%	1565 -4%	1630 0%
H.264	611	498 -18%	929 52%	634 4%	799 31%	742 21%	811 33%
WiFi v1.3	607	560 -8%	818 35%	564 -7%	718 18%	736 21%	531 -13%
Load	291	212 -27%	398 37%	180 -38%	257 -12%	275 -5%	354 22%

Pro

+ snelle SoC

+ uitstekende camera

+ nauwkeurige GPS

+ dual-SIM

+ snelle USB die gebruikt kan worden voor een extern scherm

+ uitstekende koptelefoon inbegrepen

+ goede luidsprekers

+ water- en stofdicht

Contra

- scherm is te donker

- camera-app met weinig opties

- matige MicroSD-snelheden

- LTE slechts Cat. 15

Onder de loep: HTC U11 Plus. Testtoestel voorzien door: notebooksbilliger.de

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

HTC is met de U11 Plus trouw gebleven aan zijn gevestigde design. Toch heeft de fabrikant zijn vlaggenschip een beperkter kleurpalet gegeven. HTC heeft veel goede keuzes gemaakt en berust opnieuw op de vertrouwde sterktes die we reeds in het kleinere zustermodel zagen. Een aantal voorbeelden: een bliksemsnelle Snapdragon-SoC, meer dan genoeg opslag, die nog verder uitbreidbaar is, een water- en stofdichte behuizing, een nauwkeurige GPS-module en een erg goed gekalibreerd scherm, dat ondanks zijn formaat comfortabel in de hand licht, dankzij de nieuwe 2:1 schermverhouding.

Helaas is het scherm relatief donker. Dit veroorzaakt vooral problemen in zonnige periodes, aangezien de leesbaarheid buitenshuis dan redelijk beperkt is. We vragen ons ook af waarom de HTC U11 Plus niet zijn LTE-modem ten volle benut en kiest om de snelheden te beperken tot categorie 15.

Met de U11 Plus biedt HTC een prima smartphone. Niettemin laat het toestel steken vallen op het vlak van schermhelderheid en LTE-snelheid, wat de totaalscore aantast.

De dikke batterij zorgt voor een uitstekende batterijduur. We hadden echter nog beter verwacht van een toestel van dit formaat. Batterijduur kan gelukkig nog verbeterd worden met toekomstige updates. De systeemprestaties zijn van een erg hoor niveau. Dit maakt de HTC U11 Plus tot een van de snelse Android-smartphones op de markt.

HTC U11 Plus - 2018-02-2828-02-2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing

89%

Toetsenbord

69 / 75 → 91%

Aanwijsapparaat

94%

Aansluitmogelijkheden

66 / 60 → 100%

Gewicht

89%

Batterij

92%

Beeldscherm

86%

Gaming-performance

65 / 63 → 100%

Applicatie-performance

69 / 70 → 99%

Temperatuur

90%

Luidheid

100%

Audio

79 / 91 → 87%

Camera

85%

Gemiddelde

83%

89%

Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

in vergelijking
Lenovo Moto E3 (min) MT6735P, Mali-T720	11
...
Honor View 10 Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12	29
Honor 8 Pro Kirin 960, Mali-G71 MP8	29
HTC U11 Plus 835, Adreno 540	29
Apple iPad 6 2018 A10 Fusion, A10 Fusion GPU	29
Motorola Moto G6 450, Adreno 506	29
...
HTC 10 (max) 820 MSM8996, Adreno 530	48

in vergelijking
Motorola Moto X Play (min) 615 MSM8939, Adreno 405	20
...
Huawei P smart Kirin 659, Mali-T830 MP2	58
Apple iPhone X A11 Bionic, A11 Bionic GPU	59
HTC U11 Plus 835, Adreno 540	59
Huawei P20 Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12	59
Google Pixel 2 XL 835, Adreno 540	59
...
Samsung Galaxy J6 2018 (max) 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP1	60

Kort testrapport HTC U11 Plus Smartphone

Formaat Vergelijking

Top 10 Testrapporten

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Responstijd Scherm

HTC U11 Plus audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis

Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Pricecompare