Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Gigabyte Aero 15 XA Laptop: met OLED-paneel en 4K in een nieuw design

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Glaser (vertaald door Siemon Boes), 03-08-2019

RTX-graphics in een dunne behuizing. Hoewel Gigabyte het design van zijn Aero-notebooks subtiel heeft gewijzigd, blijft het karakter van de toestellen bewaard. Kopers van de Aero 15 OLED XA krijgen een slanke en krachtige notebook met heel wat poorten. We achterhalen in ons testrapport welke prestaties je precies kan verwachten.

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA (Aero 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 855 MHz, Geheugen: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 431.11, Optimus
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, dual channel, 2 van 2 sleuven bezet, max. 64 GB
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, Samsung SDCA029, OLED, UHD, glimmend: ja
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L, 512 GB 
, PCIe, sleuven: 2x M.2 Type 2280, 433 GB beschikbaar
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Cannon Point-LP PCH - cAVS (Audio, Video, Speech)
Verbindingen
4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: gecombineerde audio-poort, Card Reader: SD-kaartlezer (UHS-II)
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Killer E2600 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 20 x 356 x 250
Batterij
94.24 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2x 2-Watt-luidspreker, Toetsenbord: chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 230-Watt-voeding, Control Center, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.214 kg, Voeding: 722 g
Prijs
2700 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA

Formaat Vergelijking

360 mm 249 mm 26 mm 2.1 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 20 mm 2.2 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 2 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
Links: HDMI 2.0, 1x USB 3.1 Type-C mit DP 1.4, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, gecombineerde audio-poort, GigabitLAN
Links: HDMI 2.0, 1x USB 3.1 Type-C mit DP 1.4, 1x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, gecombineerde audio-poort, GigabitLAN
Rechts: 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, 1x Thunderbolt 3, SD-kaartlezer, stroom
Rechts: 2x USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, 1x Thunderbolt 3, SD-kaartlezer, stroom
Achter: geen connectiviteit
Achter: geen connectiviteit
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
195 MB/s ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 202, n=249)
92.3 MB/s ∼47% -53%
Medion Erazer X15805
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼39% -61%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
241 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=247)
110 MB/s ∼45% -54%
Medion Erazer X15805
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼35% -65%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
682 MBit/s ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
Aorus 15 W9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
666 (min: 651, max: 683) MBit/s ∼96% -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 702, n=272)
605 MBit/s ∼87% -11%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
716 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Aorus 15 W9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
620 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 749, n=272)
557 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
547 (min: 364, max: 590) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
392
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
371
cd/m²
377
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
373
cd/m²
364
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
Samsung SDCA029
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 392 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 374.9 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 93 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 373 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.98 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 78% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160
Medion Erazer X15805
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080
Aorus 15 W9
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-396%
12753%
-250%
12585%
-541%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.4 (1, 1.4)
14 (7, 7)
-483%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-533%
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
-200%
13.6 (8, 5.6)
-467%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-600%
Response Time Black / White *
2.2 (1.2, 1)
9 (6, 3)
-309%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-409%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
-300%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
-445%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-482%
PWM Frequency
60 (80)
23580 (24)
39200%
23260 (19)
38667%
Screen
-24%
-10%
2%
13%
-22%
Brightness middle
373
343
-8%
266
-29%
286
-23%
282.3
-24%
295
-21%
Brightness
375
290
-23%
248
-34%
275
-27%
269
-28%
292
-22%
Brightness Distribution
93
74
-20%
89
-4%
90
-3%
90
-3%
80
-14%
Black Level *
0.37
0.31
0.37
0.32
0.34
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.98
4.22
-6%
2.78
30%
2.19
45%
1.17
71%
3.89
2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.28
7.83
-25%
5.96
5%
4.4
30%
3.29
48%
7.28
-16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.81
5.1
-81%
3.58
-27%
2.2
22%
1.3
54%
4.98
-77%
Gamma
2.62 84%
2.2 100%
2.46 89%
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.45 90%
CCT
6434 101%
6970 93%
7186 90%
6405 101%
6643 98%
6407 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
78
58
-26%
62
-21%
59
-24%
63.8
-18%
60
-23%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97
92
-5%
96
-1%
91
-6%
97.5
1%
93
-4%
Contrast
927
858
773
882
868
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.33
0.91
2.27
1.06
1.44
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-210% / -99%
6372% / 3471%
-124% / -49%
6299% / 3441%
-282% / -126%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
2.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 1.2 ms stijging
↘ 1 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
2.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 1 ms stijging
↘ 1.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 60 Hz ≤ 80 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 60 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 80 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 60 Hz is erg laag en kan dus aanleiding geven tot geïrriteerde ogen en hoofdpijn bij langer gebruik.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9345 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1164 (1153.67-1261.15)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
Medion Erazer X15805 Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1197 (1182.87-1216.55)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Aorus 15 W9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1017 (1003.76-1122.08)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
203 Points ∼100% +14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
178 Points ∼88%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼87% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼86% -2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points ∼86% -2%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H
170 Points ∼84% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 212, n=518)
156 Points ∼77% -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1253 Points ∼100%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1217 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1126 Points ∼90% -10%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1122 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=521)
829 Points ∼66% -34%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
178 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1253 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
113.22 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
Medion Erazer X15805
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6044 Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 15 W9
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5839 Points ∼97% +7%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5725 Points ∼95% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼94% +5%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼94% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
5439 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=214)
5222 Points ∼86% -4%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼100% +34%
Aorus 15 W9
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5899 Points ∼98% +31%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5751 Points ∼95% +27%
Medion Erazer X15805
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5713 Points ∼95% +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=395)
5037 Points ∼83% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
4520 Points ∼75%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 15 W9
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5077 Points ∼100% +40%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼96% +33%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4454 Points ∼88% +22%
Medion Erazer X15805
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8950HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4439 Points ∼87% +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=412)
4258 Points ∼84% +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
3638 Points ∼72%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3638 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4520 punten
Help
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
Medion Erazer X15805
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Aorus 15 W9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
2%
-4%
-6%
-6%
-14%
Write 4K
126.7
116.8
-8%
115.5
-9%
97.04
-23%
91.32
-28%
99.18
-22%
Read 4K
66.11
41.42
-37%
57.97
-12%
49.58
-25%
40.73
-38%
54.06
-18%
Write Seq
1538
1994
30%
1555
1%
1838
20%
1915
25%
1524
-1%
Read Seq
2269
2392
5%
2590
14%
2421
7%
2051
-10%
2325
2%
Write 4K Q32T1
456.7
394.9
-14%
369.3
-19%
326.9
-28%
308.3
-32%
259.2
-43%
Read 4K Q32T1
554.1
438.2
-21%
441.7
-20%
372.9
-33%
417.4
-25%
328.9
-41%
Write Seq Q32T1
1541
1987
29%
1547
0%
1894
23%
1922
25%
1566
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
2567
3457
35%
2969
16%
2828
10%
3395
32%
2767
8%
Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L
Sequential Read: 2050 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1474 MB/s
512K Read: 1303 MB/s
512K Write: 1212 MB/s
4K Read: 53.71 MB/s
4K Write: 99.47 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 386.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 326.2 MB/s
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
7277 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
7266 Points ∼100% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
6716 Points ∼92% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
6526 Points ∼90%
Medion Erazer X15805
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-8950HK
6499 Points ∼89% 0%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
6007 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=157)
5728 Points ∼79% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
18962 Points ∼99% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
18117 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17335 Points ∼91% -4%
Medion Erazer X15805
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-8950HK
16923 Points ∼88% -7%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
15501 Points ∼81% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=545)
11397 Points ∼60% -37%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
24926 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼97% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
23133 Points ∼93%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22005 Points ∼88% -5%
Medion Erazer X15805
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-8950HK
21660 Points ∼87% -6%
Aorus 15 W9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
20464 Points ∼82% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=620)
13464 Points ∼54% -42%
3DMark 11 Performance
19110 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
29711 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
16110 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
6512 punten
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +11%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
66.9 fps ∼95% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.1 fps ∼91% +1%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
63.6 fps ∼91% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
63.5 fps ∼90%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
58 fps ∼83% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=315)
49.8 fps ∼71% -22%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
156.9 fps ∼100% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
152 fps ∼97%
Medion Erazer X15805
Intel Core i9-8950HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
150.7 fps ∼96% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
150.3 fps ∼96% -1%
Aorus 15 W9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
135.9 fps ∼87% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=343)
97.6 fps ∼62% -36%
Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
103 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.3 - 142, n=185)
58.7 fps ∼57% -43%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
43.4 fps ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 87.4, n=43)
39.7 fps ∼91% -9%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G8L: Ø63.6 (57-70)
lage gem. hoge ultra4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 152fps
Thief (2014) 103fps
GTA V (2015) 1731651367769fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 63.5fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 43.4fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 119.494.689.680.628.3fps
Metro Exodus (2019) 12378584622fps
The Division 2 (2019) 150105866323fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 36.421.6fps
Control (2019) 2208159.318.1fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
34 / 35 / 45 dB (A)
Belasting
43 / 54 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Max. Belasting
 46 °C49 °C49 °C 
 41 °C47 °C45 °C 
 37 °C41 °C39 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Gemiddelde: 43.8 °C
56 °C59 °C51 °C
57 °C57 °C45 °C
40 °C40 °C39 °C
Maximum: 59 °C
Gemiddelde: 49.3 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  50 °C | Kamertemperatuur 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-12.2 °C / -22 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203641.32539.343.63128.434.54031.238.45027.632.36326.3308025.731.210027.530.312524.728.916024.842.720022.551.525020.260.931520.362.440019.668.850019.167.663017.972.58001877.5100018.374.712502175.8160018.173.9200017.671.4250018.269.5315017.871.6400017.665.8500017.863.6630017.565.9800017.663.51000017.5611250017.465.31600017.561.6SPL30.583.7N1.457.3median 18.1median 65.8Delta1.46.543.345.539.640.632.434.934.435.527.228.829.332.327.732.226.832.523.434.222.74922.958.323.562.119.962.219.762.419.260.217.967.51871.917.87118.975.217.871.617.470.117.768.517.770.917.869.317.562.417.564.617.467.717.366.717.367.617.362.630.281.91.453.1median 17.8median 66.71.54.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 15 OLED XAGigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.5 / 0.8 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 23 / 25 / 33 Watt
Belasting midlight 96 / 197 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Medion Erazer X15805
8950HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Aorus 15 W9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
14%
4%
-10%
9%
16%
6%
Idle Minimum *
23
15.1
34%
21
9%
24
-4%
18.3
20%
18
22%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=702)
16%
Idle Average *
25
19.2
23%
23
8%
27
-8%
22
12%
20
20%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=702)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
33
22.9
31%
32
3%
33
-0%
28.8
13%
28
15%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=702)
8%
Load Average *
96
107
-11%
97
-1%
129
-34%
93
3%
87
9%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=693)
-8%
Load Maximum *
197
213
-8%
213
-8%
216
-10%
215.9
-10%
175
11%
171 (21.9 - 590, n=692)
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
168
148
12%
176
-5%
142.6
15%
135
20%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
9h 51min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 42min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
2h 29min
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Medion Erazer X15805
8950HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 46.74 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 76 Wh
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Aorus 15 W9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 62 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
-46%
12%
-45%
6%
-58%
-38%
Reader / Idle
591
545
-8%
353
-40%
176
-70%
347 (39 - 1174, n=666)
-41%
WiFi v1.3
342
185
-46%
421
23%
220
-36%
362
6%
141
-59%
257 (78 - 622, n=365)
-25%
Load
149
181
21%
62
-58%
81
-46%
79 (18 - 202, n=632)
-47%

Pro

+ OLED-paneel met uitstekend contrast en zwartwaarde
+ veel aansluitmogelijkheden
+ WLAN met 802.11 ax-standaard (WiFi 6)
+ dunne schermranden

Contra

- behuizing is gevoelig voor vuil en vingerafdrukken
- redelijk luid onder belasting
- reflecterend schermoppervlakte

Conclusie - Gigabyte verbetert de Aero 15 en erft zowel plus- als minpunten

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA, testtoestel voorzien door Gigabyte Germany.
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA, testtoestel voorzien door Gigabyte Germany.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse artikel vind je hier.

In onze testen wist de Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA sterke prestaties neer te zetten ten opzichte van vergelijkbare toestellen. Hoewel de systeemprestaties in synthetische benchmarks iets achterlopen op die van de concurrentie, hebben we geen klachten over de prestaties van de processor, grafische kaart en opslag. Daarnaast is de connectiviteit goed en krijg je een future-proof WLAN-adapter met WiFi 6 of de 802.11 ax-standaard. Het herwerkte design bouwt verder op de sterktes van het model van de voorganger, maar blijft even gevoelig voor vuil en vingerafdrukken.

Gigabyte heeft de Aero 15 subtiel verbeterd, waardoor we de notebook met zijn slanke design en goede prestaties nog altijd kunnen aanbevelen.

Het hoogtepunt is uiteraard het 4K OLED-paneel. De voordelen met betrekking tot het contrast en de zwartwaarde zijn onmiskenbaar. Maar er hangen ook nadelen aan vast, waaronder PWM, dat vooral vervelend is voor gebruikers met gevoelige ogen. Daarnaast is het omwille van het reflecterende scherm ook moeilijker om het toestel buitenshuis te gebruiken. Ten slotte willen we graag vermelden dat de koeling en batterijduur uitstekend zijn, waardoor we de Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA zouden aanbevelen aan iedereen die op zoek is naar een slanke en krachtige notebook.

Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XA - 20-09-2019 v7
Mike Wobker

Behuizing
87 / 98 → 89%
Toetsenbord
86%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
69 / 80 → 86%
Gewicht
62 / 10-66 → 92%
Batterij
67 / 95 → 71%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
92%
Applicatie-performance
86%
Temperatuur
77 / 95 → 81%
Luidheid
57 / 90 → 63%
Audio
76%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Gemiddelde
74%
84%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Gigabyte Aero 15 XA Laptop: met OLED-paneel en 4K in een nieuw design
Mike Wobker, 2019-08- 3 (Update: 2019-08- 3)