Notebookcheck

Kort testraport Schenker XMG Fusion 15: Het referentieontwerp van Intel daagt de concurrentie uit

Snel referentiemodel. Intel en Schenker hebben een dunne gaming-laptop gemaakt met een goede batterijlevensduur, hoge prestaties en een uitgebreid aanbod aan poorten. Veegt dit model de vloer aan met concurrerende apparaten van Razer, Acer, Gigabyte en Asus?
Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Andrea Grüblinger,
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 (XMG Fusion 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 885 MHz, Geheugen: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, Forceware 430.81, Optimus Intel UHD 630
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, Corsair PC4-21300
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 144Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Opslag
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, Raid 0 en 1
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: Mic, audio-uit, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 20 x 356.4 x 233.7
Batterij
93 Wh, 8000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD webcam, Windows Hello compatible
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix 1280x720
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: optomechanisch toetsenbord met RGB verlichting per toets, stille schakelaars, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 230 Watt stroomadapter, Control Center, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.89 kg, Voeding: 830 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15

Size Comparison

360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356.4 mm 233.7 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +154%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼92% +133%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 212, n=290)
93.6 MB/s ∼48% +21%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.6 MB/s ∼39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +180%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.2 MB/s ∼82% +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=288)
111 MB/s ∼46% +28%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.4 MB/s ∼36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=334)
704 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼99% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
694 MBit/s ∼99% +15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼97% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼97% +13%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
603 (min: 531, max: 676) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=334)
656 MBit/s ∼96% +7%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
611 (min: 491, max: 652) MBit/s ∼89%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
554 MBit/s ∼81% -9%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø603 (531-676)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø614 (541-652)
325
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
BOE NV156FHM-N4G
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 331 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 309.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.4 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 85 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 331 cd/m²
Contrast: 1034:1 (Zwart: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
BOE NV156FHM-N4G, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
6%
6%
-57%
-70%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4, 4)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
10%
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
35%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-90%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-110%
Response Time Black / White *
9 (5, 4)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
2%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-24%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-24%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-29%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
6%
12%
9%
8%
Brightness middle
331
286
-14%
288
-13%
266
-20%
314.7
-5%
Brightness
309
275
-11%
265
-14%
248
-20%
312
1%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
84
-1%
89
5%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.32
0.37
-16%
0.22
31%
0.31
3%
0.38
-19%
Contrast
1034
773
-25%
1309
27%
858
-17%
828
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.19
51%
3.22
28%
2.78
38%
2.56
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8
4.4
45%
6.26
22%
5.96
25%
4.89
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.9
2.27
-19%
1.5
21%
0.91
52%
1.71
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
2.2
53%
3.43
27%
3.58
24%
3.4
28%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.41 91%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.3 96%
CCT
7537 86%
6405 101%
7290 89%
7186 90%
6435 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59
0%
60
2%
62
5%
60.7
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
91
0%
93
2%
96
5%
94.6
4%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
6% / 6%
9% / 11%
-24% / -1%
-31% / -4%

* ... kleiner is beter

CalMAN grayscale - voor calibratie
CalMAN grayscale - voor calibratie
CalMAN saturation sweeps - voor calibratie
CalMAN saturation sweeps - voor calibratie
CalMAN Color Checker - voor calibratie
CalMAN Color Checker - voor calibratie
CalMAN grayscale - na calibratie
CalMAN grayscale - na calibratie
CalMAN saturation sweeps - na calibratie
CalMAN saturation sweeps - na calibratie
CalMAN Color Checker - na calibratie
CalMAN Color Checker - na calibratie

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
9 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4 ms stijging
↘ 4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17878 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

System info: CPU-Z CPU
System info: CPU-Z cache
System info: CPU-Z mainboard
System info: CPU-Z memory
System info: CPU-Z SPD
System info: CPU-Z graphics
System info: GPU-Z
System info: GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics
System info: HWiNFO
System info: Intel XTU
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300Tooltip
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1225 (1188.53-1294.79)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=80)
184 Points ∼97% +1%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
183 Points ∼97%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼94% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼93% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=595)
160 Points ∼85% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1294 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=83)
1180 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=599)
902 Points ∼70% -30%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1294 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
183 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114.77 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7357 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7314 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4938 - 8220, n=10)
7064 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6936 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6888 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6708 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=276)
6450 Points ∼88% -12%
Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7695 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7661 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7547 Points ∼98% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7515 Points ∼98% 0%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7490 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (6834 - 7754, n=10)
7388 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=277)
7289 Points ∼95% -3%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
9534 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9472 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (9140 - 9741, n=10)
9401 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
9366 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
9231 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=278)
8732 Points ∼92% -8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8517 Points ∼89% -11%
Score
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5784 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5115 - 5991, n=10)
5637 Points ∼97% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=280)
5311 Points ∼92% -8%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5694 Points ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4520 - 6035, n=7)
5523 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=439)
5101 Points ∼85% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4890 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (3638 - 5661, n=7)
4692 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=456)
4284 Points ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4890 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5931 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5694 punten
Help
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
7%
15%
14%
-8%
21%
Write 4K
106.47
97.04
-9%
108.8
2%
115.5
8%
93.88
-12%
145 (99.3 - 197, n=13)
36%
Read 4K
42.24
49.58
17%
40.31
-5%
57.97
37%
40.56
-4%
47 (38.5 - 53.2, n=13)
11%
Write Seq
1465.81
1838
25%
2488
70%
1555
6%
1468
0%
1832 (1087 - 2900, n=13)
25%
Read Seq
1336.59
2421
81%
1916
43%
2590
94%
1540
15%
1815 (974 - 2929, n=13)
36%
Write 4K Q32T1
337.26
326.9
-3%
382.4
13%
369.3
10%
293.5
-13%
409 (311 - 557, n=13)
21%
Read 4K Q32T1
407.59
372.9
-9%
421.8
3%
441.7
8%
346
-15%
486 (351 - 648, n=13)
19%
Write Seq Q32T1
2932.8
1894
-35%
2542
-13%
1547
-47%
1941
-34%
3232 (2933 - 3280, n=13)
10%
Read Seq Q32T1
3235.3
2828
-13%
3320
3%
2969
-8%
3266
1%
3479 (3235 - 3565, n=13)
8%
AS SSD
-28%
-2%
-23%
-7%
4%
Copy Game MB/s
1216.28
1140.57
-6%
1200.14
-1%
1099 (787 - 1434, n=6)
-10%
Copy Program MB/s
511.09
454.24
-11%
525.53
3%
438 (243 - 570, n=6)
-14%
Copy ISO MB/s
1997.6
2085.95
4%
1974.98
-1%
1939 (1394 - 2728, n=6)
-3%
Score Total
4886
2896
-41%
4329
-11%
2870
-41%
4079
-17%
5051 (4379 - 5862, n=12)
3%
Score Write
2694
1528
-43%
1927
-28%
1141
-58%
2010
-25%
2534 (1902 - 2859, n=12)
-6%
Score Read
1454
923
-37%
1604
10%
1186
-18%
1362
-6%
1663 (1414 - 2359, n=12)
14%
Access Time Write *
0.031
0.04
-29%
0.065
-110%
0.033
-6%
0.0292 (0.023 - 0.037, n=12)
6%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.08
-27%
0.042
33%
0.047
25%
0.0498 (0.033 - 0.092, n=12)
21%
4K-64 Write
2358.62
1253
-47%
1546.17
-34%
921.88
-61%
1717.43
-27%
2155 (1494 - 2444, n=12)
-9%
4K-64 Read
1159.12
623.93
-46%
1272.09
10%
875.61
-24%
1125.76
-3%
1355 (1156 - 2050, n=12)
17%
4K Write
117.18
103.6
-12%
143.57
23%
126.51
8%
110.72
-6%
132 (99.1 - 166, n=12)
13%
4K Read
50.57
48.32
-4%
42.95
-15%
59.11
17%
52.31
3%
52.9 (30 - 62.3, n=12)
5%
Seq Write
2178.95
1711.53
-21%
2374.01
9%
923.81
-58%
1822.26
-16%
2470 (2081 - 2779, n=12)
13%
Seq Read
2438.1
2505.83
3%
2888.39
18%
2516.94
3%
1839.67
-25%
2547 (2172 - 2975, n=12)
4%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-11% / -13%
7% / 6%
-5% / -10%
-8% / -7%
13% / 10%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3235.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2932.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 407.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 337.26 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1336.59 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1465.81 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 106.47 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
25259 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22749 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼90% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 27694, n=25)
22176 Points ∼88% -12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22005 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=691)
14444 Points ∼57% -43%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
20201 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
18060 Points ∼89% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 21191, n=26)
17396 Points ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17335 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=614)
12070 Points ∼60% -40%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
125189 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
114431 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
112480 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
109473 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
106170 Points ∼85% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (39014 - 134255, n=24)
94022 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=592)
70974 Points ∼57% -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
20181 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39529 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17593 punten
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
66 fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.9, n=25)
65.1 fps ∼93% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.1 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=386)
52.6 fps ∼75% -20%
F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
105 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (97 - 112, n=5)
104 fps ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
103 (min: 92) fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.8 - 167, n=35)
96.2 fps ∼92% -8%
Dirt Rally 2.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
79.1 (min: 64) fps ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
77.4 fps ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
75 (min: 53) fps ∼95% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (68.8 - 79.1, n=4)
74.4 fps ∼94% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 114, n=33)
70.2 fps ∼89% -9%
Anthem - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
79 (min: 64) fps ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
75.7 (min: 49) fps ∼96% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (67.8 - 75.7, n=4)
71.9 fps ∼91% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
70.6 fps ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (24 - 112, n=21)
66.2 fps ∼84% -6%
Farming Simulator 19 - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
128.1 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 128, n=2)
117 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 140, n=11)
75.1 fps ∼59% -41%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 89, n=10)
78.9 fps ∼100% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (23 - 124, n=96)
75 fps ∼95% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
74.2 fps ∼94% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
72 fps ∼91%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
68.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
66 fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.9, n=25)
65.1 fps ∼93% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
64.1 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=386)
52.6 fps ∼75% -20%
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø66 (59-73)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø49.5 (46-53)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G: Ø50.3 (45-54)
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 66 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 77 72 fps
Farming Simulator 19 (2018) 128.1 fps
Anthem (2019) 70.6 fps
Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) 77.4 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 105 fps
De ventilator blijft permanent uitgeschakeld in de stille modus
De ventilator blijft permanent uitgeschakeld in de stille modus

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30 / 30 / 30 dB (A)
Belasting
46 / 51.6 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Emissions
Fan Noise
51.6
Noise
-9%
-5%
-8%
9%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
30
31
-3%
30
-0%
31
-3%
28.8
4%
Idle Average *
30
33
-10%
33
-10%
34
-13%
28.8
4%
Idle Maximum *
30
38
-27%
39
-30%
39
-30%
29.4
2%
Load Average *
46
50
-9%
45
2%
46
-0%
35.7
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51.5
53
-3%
49
5%
53
-3%
42.5
17%
Load Maximum *
51.6
56
-9%
51
1%
55
-7%
45
13%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-9% / -9%
-5% / -5%
-8% / -8%
9% / 9%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 46 °C52.7 °C43.2 °C 
 27.6 °C45.3 °C28.6 °C 
 32.1 °C36.1 °C35.9 °C 
Maximum: 52.7 °C
Gemiddelde: 38.6 °C
41.6 °C50 °C44.1 °C
35.7 °C52.2 °C35.1 °C
33 °C36.1 °C33.3 °C
Maximum: 52.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 40.1 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  26.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 23.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.2 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.3 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.3 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-8.3 °C / -15 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.73132.72533.530.333.53138.231.638.24030.329.930.35034.831.234.86330.626.730.68025.326.625.31002624.72612528.123.828.116034.323.834.32003422.33425041.120.741.131548.320.148.340054.819.754.850056.619.256.663057.61957.680067.118.367.1100064.617.864.6125060.617.960.6160052.617.452.6200055.317.355.3250053.917.353.9315058.717.158.7400050.117.450.1500048.817.348.863005517.555800056.317.456.31000050.717.550.71250045.217.345.21600045.217.545.2SPL70.93070.9N25.71.325.7median 52.6median 17.8median 52.6Delta6.31.66.343.644.939.640.430.933.83542.828.335.92635.828.642.128.757.423.854.622.957.423.958.52560.92064.219.16417.965.117.372.516.97517.177.818.576.717.874.917.474.117.467.717.676.817.583.317.484.217.279.817.271.617.266.51769.216.863.43090.21.481.4median 17.5median 69.21.86hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.7 / 1.6 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 7.5 / 14.6 / 17 Watt
Belasting midlight 181 / 243 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IGZO, 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-61%
15%
-43%
8%
-31%
-45%
Idle Minimum *
7.5
24
-220%
7
7%
21
-180%
10.4
-39%
16 (5 - 46, n=22)
-113%
18.9 (1.9 - 113, n=770)
-152%
Idle Average *
14.6
27
-85%
12
18%
23
-58%
14.6
-0%
20.7 (12 - 59, n=22)
-42%
24.4 (6 - 119, n=770)
-67%
Idle Maximum *
17
33
-94%
22
-29%
32
-88%
16.3
4%
27.8 (16.3 - 65.5, n=22)
-64%
29.9 (8.3 - 122, n=770)
-76%
Load Average *
181
129
29%
86
52%
97
46%
88.5
51%
103 (83.4 - 181, n=22)
43%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=761)
43%
Witcher 3 ultra *
170
176
-4%
144
15%
148
13%
155.4
9%
Load Maximum *
243
216
11%
177
27%
213
12%
182.4
25%
198 (120 - 249, n=22)
19%
175 (21.9 - 590, n=760)
28%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
9h 19min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
6h 00min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 28min
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 93 Wh
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
-35%
20%
40%
10%
34%
-32%
-5%
-24%
Reader / Idle
559
353
-37%
666
19%
545
-3%
682
22%
549
-2%
335
-40%
507
-9%
359 (39 - 1174, n=717)
-36%
WiFi v1.3
360
220
-39%
478
33%
421
17%
387
8%
382
6%
190
-47%
362
1%
266 (62 - 622, n=431)
-26%
Load
88
62
-30%
96
9%
181
106%
88
0%
174
98%
81
-8%
81
-8%
79.7 (18 - 243, n=685)
-9%
H.264
408
364
356
266 (88 - 554, n=161)

Pro

+ Turbo Boost bijna permanent actief
+ goede gamingprestaties
+ toetsenbord met goede feedback
+ responsief 144-Hz beeldscherm
+ goede batterijduur
+ veel poorten, waaronder Thunderbolt en USB 3.1 Gen 2
+ snelle, nieuwste generatie Wi-Fi
+ zeer goede microfoon
+ lichtgewicht ten opzichte van zijn prestatieklasse
+ eenvoudig onderhoud, ventilatorreiniging

Contra

- erg luid onder belasting/tijdens het gamen
- sRGB niet volledig gedekt
- slechte webcam
Schenker Fusion 15: Gaming laptop met bescheiden, ultrabook-geïnspireerd ontwerp
Schenker Fusion 15: Gaming laptop met bescheiden, ultrabook-geïnspireerd ontwerp

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De technische kant van het verhaal heeft enorm geprofiteerd van de samenwerking tussen Intel en Schenker: de Fusion 15 biedt meer prestaties dan concurrerende dunne gaming-laptops, ook al is deze uitgerust met dezelfde hardware. De prestaties van de CPU profiteren het meest, terwijl de verschillen in games marginaal zijn. Dit weerspiegelt niet alleen goed de koeloplossing, maar spreekt ook voor een goede balans tussen de energielimieten van de SoC's en de GPU.

Onze configuratie van de Fusion 15 (RTX 2070) combineert draagbaarheid en prestaties, die vaak elkaar uitsluiten, zoals bijna geen ander apparaat.

Aan de andere kant heeft de dunne 15-inch laptop een verrassend goede batterijlevensduur: we konden een looptijd van respectievelijk zes en iets meer dan negen uur behalen in onze Wi-Fi-test en in rust. Hoewel er andere apparaten zijn die deze tijden kunnen evenaren (Acer Predator Triton 500), zijn ze niet in staat om hetzelfde soort prestaties uit de componenten te halen op netstroom.

De aluminium-magnesiumlegering behuizing weegt 200 gram minder dan zijn aluminium tegenhangers. Desondanks is de constructiekwaliteit van de bescheiden, matte behuizing goed.

Schenker sluit ook geen compromissen als het gaat om connectiviteit, onderhoud en uitbreidingsmogelijkheden. De DisplayPort-compatibele Thunderbolt-connector en de twee M.2-2280-slots zijn even indrukwekkend.

De nadelen zijn allereerst de hoge geluidsniveaus tijdens het gamen en onder belasting. Voor creatief werk kan het ontbreken van volledige sRGB-dekking en de lage contrastverhouding ook een probleem zijn. Aan de andere kant zullen gamers daar minder last van hebben en kunnen ze genieten van 144-Hz en lage responstijden. Deze functies maken het onvoldoende contrast bijna goed.

Als je op zoek bent naar nog meer prestaties, is de categorie 'dun en licht' misschien niet de juiste keuze. Schenker en Intel hebben draagbaarheid en prestaties zeer goed bij elkaar weten te brengen.

 

 

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 - 17-10-2019 v7
Sebastian Jentsch

Behuizing
82 / 98 → 84%
Toetsenbord
97%
Aanwijsapparaat
96%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
60 / 80 → 75%
Gewicht
64 / 10-66 → 97%
Batterij
69 / 95 → 72%
Beeldscherm
84%
Gaming-performance
93%
Applicatie-performance
90%
Temperatuur
80 / 95 → 84%
Luidheid
78 / 90 → 86%
Audio
46%
Camera
30 / 85 → 35%
Gemiddelde
75%
84%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testraport Schenker XMG Fusion 15: Het referentieontwerp van Intel daagt de concurrentie uit
Sebastian Jentsch, 2019-10- 6 (Update: 2019-10- 6)