Notebookcheck

Kort testraport Schenker XMG Fusion 15: Het referentieontwerp van Intel daagt de concurrentie uit

Sebastian Jentsch, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, Andrea Grüblinger, 06-10-2019

Snel referentiemodel. Intel en Schenker hebben een dunne gaming-laptop gemaakt met een goede batterijlevensduur, hoge prestaties en een uitgebreid aanbod aan poorten. Veegt dit model de vloer aan met concurrerende apparaten van Razer, Acer, Gigabyte en Asus?

Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 885 MHz, Geheugen: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, Forceware 430.81, Optimus Intel UHD 630
Geheugen
16384 MB 
, Corsair PC4-21300
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 144Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Opslag
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, Raid 0 en 1
Geluidskaart
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Verbindingen
2 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: Mic, audio-uit, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 20 x 356.4 x 233.7
Batterij
93 Wh, 8000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD webcam, Windows Hello compatible
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix 1280x720
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Stereo, Toetsenbord: optomechanisch toetsenbord met RGB verlichting per toets, stille schakelaars, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 230 Watt stroomadapter, Control Center, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
1.89 kg, Voeding: 830 g
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15
Schenker Fusion 15

Size Comparison

360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356.4 mm 233.7 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Achterkant: RJ-45 (LAN), Thunderbolt 3/USB Type-C 3.1 Gen 2 (DisplayPort & G-Sync ondersteund, geen Power Delivery, HDMI 2.0 HDCP 2.2)
Achterkant: RJ-45 (LAN), Thunderbolt 3/USB Type-C 3.1 Gen 2 (DisplayPort & G-Sync ondersteund, geen Power Delivery, HDMI 2.0 HDCP 2.2)
Rechterkant: USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 2, audio-uit, audio-in
Rechterkant: USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 2, audio-uit, audio-in
Linkerkant: 2x USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 1, kaartlezer
Linkerkant: 2x USB Type-A 3.1 Gen 1, kaartlezer
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +154%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181 MB/s ∼92% +133%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=262)
91.7 MB/s ∼47% +18%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
77.6 MB/s ∼39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +180%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198.2 MB/s ∼82% +129%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=260)
109 MB/s ∼45% +26%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86.4 MB/s ∼36%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
694 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼98% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s ∼98% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1380, n=283)
614 MBit/s ∼88% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
603 (min: 531, max: 676) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +11%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼96% +7%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
611 (min: 491, max: 652) MBit/s ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1160, n=283)
566 MBit/s ∼83% -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
554 MBit/s ∼81% -9%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø603 (531-676)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø614 (541-652)
325
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
BOE NV156FHM-N4G
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 331 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 309.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.4 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 85 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 331 cd/m²
Contrast: 1034:1 (Zwart: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.31
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
BOE NV156FHM-N4G, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), , 1920x1080, 15.6
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
6%
6%
-57%
-70%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4, 4)
7.2 (3.8, 3.4)
10%
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
35%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-90%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-110%
Response Time Black / White *
9 (5, 4)
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
2%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-24%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
-24%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-29%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
6%
12%
9%
8%
Brightness middle
331
286
-14%
288
-13%
266
-20%
314.7
-5%
Brightness
309
275
-11%
265
-14%
248
-20%
312
1%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
84
-1%
89
5%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.32
0.37
-16%
0.22
31%
0.31
3%
0.38
-19%
Contrast
1034
773
-25%
1309
27%
858
-17%
828
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
2.19
51%
3.22
28%
2.78
38%
2.56
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8
4.4
45%
6.26
22%
5.96
25%
4.89
39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.9
2.27
-19%
1.5
21%
0.91
52%
1.71
10%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
2.2
53%
3.43
27%
3.58
24%
3.4
28%
Gamma
2.31 95%
2.41 91%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.3 96%
CCT
7537 86%
6405 101%
7290 89%
7186 90%
6435 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
59
0%
60
2%
62
5%
60.7
3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91
91
0%
93
2%
96
5%
94.6
4%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
6% / 6%
9% / 11%
-24% / -1%
-31% / -4%

* ... kleiner is beter

CalMAN grayscale - voor calibratie
CalMAN grayscale - voor calibratie
CalMAN saturation sweeps - voor calibratie
CalMAN saturation sweeps - voor calibratie
CalMAN Color Checker - voor calibratie
CalMAN Color Checker - voor calibratie
CalMAN grayscale - na calibratie
CalMAN grayscale - na calibratie
CalMAN saturation sweeps - na calibratie
CalMAN saturation sweeps - na calibratie
CalMAN Color Checker - na calibratie
CalMAN Color Checker - na calibratie

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
9 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 5 ms stijging
↘ 4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.8 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4 ms stijging
↘ 4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9364 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

System info: CPU-Z CPU
System info: CPU-Z cache
System info: CPU-Z mainboard
System info: CPU-Z memory
System info: CPU-Z SPD
System info: CPU-Z graphics
System info: GPU-Z
System info: GPU-Z Intel UHD Graphics
System info: HWiNFO
System info: Intel XTU
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300Tooltip
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1225 (1188.53-1294.79)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
183 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=63)
183 Points ∼97% 0%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points ∼94% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼93% -4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=534)
157 Points ∼83% -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1294 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (964 - 1306, n=65)
1185 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼86% -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=537)
839 Points ∼65% -35%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1294 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
183 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
114.77 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7357 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7314 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (6765 - 8220, n=9)
7300 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
6936 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6888 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6708 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=226)
6400 Points ∼87% -13%
Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7695 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
7661 Points ∼100% +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7547 Points ∼98% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
7515 Points ∼98% 0%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7490 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (6834 - 7695, n=9)
7347 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=227)
7186 Points ∼93% -4%
Essentials
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
9534 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9472 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (9140 - 9741, n=9)
9391 Points ∼99% -1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
9366 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
9231 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=228)
8555 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8517 Points ∼89% -11%
Score
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5784 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼99% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5439 - 5991, n=9)
5695 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=230)
5242 Points ∼91% -9%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5694 Points ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4520 - 6035, n=6)
5624 Points ∼93% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6515, n=406)
5051 Points ∼84% -11%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4890 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (3638 - 5661, n=6)
4756 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=423)
4265 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4890 punten
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5931 punten
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5694 punten
Help
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
7%
15%
14%
-8%
20%
Write 4K
106.47
97.04
-9%
108.8
2%
115.5
8%
93.88
-12%
148 (99.3 - 197, n=8)
39%
Read 4K
42.24
49.58
17%
40.31
-5%
57.97
37%
40.56
-4%
47.2 (38.5 - 53.2, n=8)
12%
Write Seq
1465.81
1838
25%
2488
70%
1555
6%
1468
0%
1712 (1087 - 2718, n=8)
17%
Read Seq
1336.59
2421
81%
1916
43%
2590
94%
1540
15%
1553 (974 - 2559, n=8)
16%
Write 4K Q32T1
337.26
326.9
-3%
382.4
13%
369.3
10%
293.5
-13%
430 (337 - 557, n=8)
27%
Read 4K Q32T1
407.59
372.9
-9%
421.8
3%
441.7
8%
346
-15%
521 (408 - 648, n=8)
28%
Write Seq Q32T1
2932.8
1894
-35%
2542
-13%
1547
-47%
1941
-34%
3217 (2933 - 3280, n=8)
10%
Read Seq Q32T1
3235.3
2828
-13%
3320
3%
2969
-8%
3266
1%
3448 (3235 - 3556, n=8)
7%
AS SSD
-28%
-2%
-23%
-7%
3%
Copy Game MB/s
1216.28
1140.57
-6%
1200.14
-1%
1099 (787 - 1434, n=6)
-10%
Copy Program MB/s
511.09
454.24
-11%
525.53
3%
438 (243 - 570, n=6)
-14%
Copy ISO MB/s
1997.6
2085.95
4%
1974.98
-1%
1939 (1394 - 2728, n=6)
-3%
Score Total
4886
2896
-41%
4329
-11%
2870
-41%
4079
-17%
5037 (4379 - 5862, n=8)
3%
Score Write
2694
1528
-43%
1927
-28%
1141
-58%
2010
-25%
2529 (1902 - 2853, n=8)
-6%
Score Read
1454
923
-37%
1604
10%
1186
-18%
1362
-6%
1655 (1414 - 2359, n=8)
14%
Access Time Write *
0.031
0.04
-29%
0.065
-110%
0.033
-6%
0.0294 (0.023 - 0.037, n=8)
5%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.08
-27%
0.042
33%
0.047
25%
0.0498 (0.033 - 0.092, n=8)
21%
4K-64 Write
2358.62
1253
-47%
1546.17
-34%
921.88
-61%
1717.43
-27%
2154 (1494 - 2431, n=8)
-9%
4K-64 Read
1159.12
623.93
-46%
1272.09
10%
875.61
-24%
1125.76
-3%
1359 (1156 - 2050, n=8)
17%
4K Write
117.18
103.6
-12%
143.57
23%
126.51
8%
110.72
-6%
130 (99.1 - 166, n=8)
11%
4K Read
50.57
48.32
-4%
42.95
-15%
59.11
17%
52.31
3%
50.9 (30 - 59, n=8)
1%
Seq Write
2178.95
1711.53
-21%
2374.01
9%
923.81
-58%
1822.26
-16%
2454 (2081 - 2779, n=8)
13%
Seq Read
2438.1
2505.83
3%
2888.39
18%
2516.94
3%
1839.67
-25%
2445 (2172 - 2716, n=8)
0%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-11% / -13%
7% / 6%
-5% / -10%
-8% / -7%
12% / 9%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3235.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2932.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 407.59 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 337.26 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1336.59 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1465.81 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 42.24 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 106.47 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
25259 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
24267 Points ∼96% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22749 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
22723 Points ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22005 Points ∼87% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 25259, n=21)
21637 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=636)
13686 Points ∼54% -46%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
20201 Points ∼100%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
19123 Points ∼95% -5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18153 Points ∼90% -10%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
18060 Points ∼89% -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17335 Points ∼86% -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 20201, n=22)
17020 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=561)
11547 Points ∼57% -43%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
125189 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
114431 Points ∼91% -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
112480 Points ∼90% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H
109473 Points ∼87% -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
106170 Points ∼85% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (39014 - 125189, n=20)
91060 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=542)
68419 Points ∼55% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
20181 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
39529 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17593 punten
Help
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
68.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
66 fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=20)
64.6 fps ∼92% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.1 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=331)
50.5 fps ∼72% -23%
F1 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
105 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
103 (min: 92) fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (97 - 105, n=4)
103 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.8 - 152, n=22)
88.3 fps ∼84% -16%
Dirt Rally 2.0 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
79.1 (min: 64) fps ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
77.4 fps ∼98%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
75 (min: 53) fps ∼95% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (68.8 - 79.1, n=4)
74.4 fps ∼94% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 114, n=23)
69.8 fps ∼88% -10%
Anthem - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
79 (min: 64) fps ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
75.7 (min: 49) fps ∼96% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (67.8 - 75.7, n=4)
71.9 fps ∼91% +2%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
70.6 fps ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (29.1 - 112, n=18)
69.3 fps ∼88% -2%
Farming Simulator 19 - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
128.1 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 128, n=2)
117 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.6 - 140, n=10)
77 fps ∼60% -40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 84, n=8)
76.8 fps ∼100% +7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
74.2 fps ∼97% +3%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
72 fps ∼94%
Average of class Gaming
  (23 - 124, n=58)
71.1 fps ∼93% -1%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
70.2 (min: 58) fps ∼100% +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
68.9 fps ∼98% +4%
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 XFU15L19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
66 fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (57 - 80.8, n=20)
64.6 fps ∼92% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
64.4 (min: 54) fps ∼92% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
64.1 fps ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=331)
50.5 fps ∼72% -23%
051015202530354045505560657075808590