Kort testrapport Acer Predator Triton 500 (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) Laptop

Name: Acer Predator Triton 500
Brand: Acer

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, 17-02-2019

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Nauwelijks iets te klagen. Met de Predator Triton 500 presenteert Acer een uiterst compacte gamingnotebook die ondanks de kleine afmetingen krachtige componenten biedt. Naast een Intel hexa-core processor, is ook de gloednieuwe GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q high-end GPU van Nvidia een echte krachtpatser.

Testtoestel voorzien door Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Acer Predator Triton 500 (Predator Triton Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-8750H

Grafische kaart

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 735 MHz, Geheugen: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 417.71

Geheugen

32768 MB

, 2x 16 GB DDR4-2666, dual channel, alle slots bezet

Beeldscherm

15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glimmend: nee

Moederbord

Intel HM370

Opslag

2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0), 512 GB

, NVMe SSDs; slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280

Geluidskaart

Realtek Unknown @ Intel Cannon Point PCH

Verbindingen

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 1x koptelefoon, 1x microfoon

Netwerkmogelijkheden

Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0

Afmetingen

hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 18 x 359 x 255

Batterij

82 Wh, 5400 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cellen

Besturingssysteem

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Bijkomende functionaliteiten

Luidsprekers: 2.0, Toetsenbord: chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 180 Watt stroomadapter, diverse tools, XSplit Gamecaster testversie, 24 Maanden Garantie

Gewicht

2.144 kg

Prijs

2600 EUR

Links

Acer startpagina
Acer laptopsectie

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

zie alle specificaties

Linkerkant: stroomaansluiting, RJ45-LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, microfoon, koptelefoon

Rechterkant: Thunderbolt 3, mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB-A 3.0, Kensington lock

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	684 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	678 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	671 MBit/s ∼98%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	660 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming (141 - 1490, n=286)	620 MBit/s ∼91% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	683 MBit/s ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	680 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	662 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Wireless-AC 9560	655 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming (144 - 1420, n=286)	573 MBit/s ∼83% -16%


280 cd/m²	298 cd/m²	290 cd/m²
296 cd/m²	304 cd/m²	312 cd/m²
287 cd/m²	306 cd/m²	314 cd/m²

Helderheidsverdeling

AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED)

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 314 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 298.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 89 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 304 cd/m²
Contrast: 1126:1 (Zwart: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.66 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.72
ΔE Greyscale 5.53 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.5

ICC-profiel (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator Triton 500 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times		-63%	-57%	-67%	9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	8 (4, 4)	16.4 (8.8, 7.6) -105%	16.8 (9.2, 7.6) -110%	17.6 (9.2, 8.4) -120%	7.4 (3.8, 3.6) 7%
Response Time Black / White *	11.2 (6, 5.2)	13.6 (8.4, 5.2) -21%	11.6 (7.2, 4.4) -4%	12.8 (7.6, 5.2) -14%	10 (4.4, 5.6) 11%
PWM Frequency
Screen		15%	7%	14%	11%
Brightness middle	304	250 -18%	314.7 4%	254 -16%	294 -3%
Brightness	299	235 -21%	312 4%	262 -12%	275 -8%
Brightness Distribution	89	85 -4%	90 1%	89 0%	84 -6%
Black Level *	0.27	0.29 -7%	0.38 -41%	0.22 19%	0.24 11%
Contrast	1126	862 -23%	828 -26%	1155 3%	1225 9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.66	1.46 69%	2.56 45%	2.37 49%	2.57 45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	9.65	2.47 74%	4.89 49%	4.71 51%	4.88 49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	1.72		1.71 1%	1.84 -7%	2.14 -24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	5.53	1.27 77%	3.4 39%	1.58 71%	2.41 56%
Gamma	2.5 ^88%	2.4 ^92%	2.3 ^96%	2.48 ^89%	2.5 ^88%
CCT	8028 ^81%	6749 ^96%	6435 ^101%	6785 ^96%	6370 ^102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	60 0%	60.7 1%	60 0%	59 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	93 0%	94.6 2%	92 -1%	91 -2%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)		-24% / 2%	-25% / -3%	-27% / 2%	10% / 11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.

↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
11.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 6 ms stijging
11.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.9 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↗ 4 ms stijging
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd	↘ 4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.

Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 13573 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.98 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

10.98 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

176 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1019 Points

Help

... in vergelijking

Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (927.26-1023.23)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	176 Points ∼100%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming (77 - 215, n=540)	157 Points ∼89% -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	1156 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1120 Points ∼97% +10%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	1053 Points ∼91% +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	1019 Points ∼88%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H	999 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Gaming (196 - 2022, n=543)	845 Points ∼73% -17%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	2 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.98 Points ∼99%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1.89 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming (0.71 - 2.43, n=423)	1.692 Points ∼85% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	12.44 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H	11.82 Points ∼95% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H	10.98 Points ∼88%
Average of class Gaming (1.13 - 22.3, n=524)	7.45 Points ∼60% -32%

PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	5883 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5416 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	5353 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming (2603 - 7511, n=235)	5264 Points ∼89% -11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5170 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5095 Points ∼87% -13%

	Acer Predator Triton 500 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
AS SSD		-16%	1%	-3%	-21%
Score Total	3770	2722 -28%	4079 8%	4122 9%	3294 -13%
Score Write	1435	957 -33%	2010 40%	2051 43%	1515 6%
Score Read	1558	1180 -24%	1362 -13%	1346 -14%	1161 -25%
4K Write	107.21	107.12 0%	110.72 3%	107.15 0%	103.63 -3%
4K Read	38.7	55.04 42%	52.31 35%	48.94 26%	40.02 3%
Seq Write	2492.02	1471.06 -41%	1822.26 -27%	1834.04 -26%	1260.72 -49%
Seq Read	2913.4	2112.83 -27%	1839.67 -37%	1266.1 -57%	903.24 -69%

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2902 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 338.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 298.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 2107 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2455 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.82 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 93.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q	28083 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22723 Points ∼81% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	22089 Points ∼79% -21%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18687 Points ∼67% -33%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	18296 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming (513 - 50983, n=641)	13786 Points ∼49% -51%

3DMark 11 Performance		20149 punten
Help

... in vergelijking

Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)

Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)

Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)

MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø49.5 (46-53)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø50.3 (45-54)

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	68.9 fps ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼76% -24%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	52.7 fps ∼69% -31%
Average of class Gaming (12.6 - 115, n=335)	50.8 fps ∼66% -34%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	49.2 fps ∼64% -36%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Predator Triton 500 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	136 (min: 104) fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	130.1 fps ∼96% -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	95.5 fps ∼70% -30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	90.4 fps ∼66% -34%
Average of class Gaming (11.1 - 194, n=288)	89.2 fps ∼66% -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	86.5 fps ∼64% -36%

	lage	gem.	hoge	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)			136	76.5	fps
Battlefield 1 (2016)			134	129	fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017)			65	62	fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast		30 / 32 / 34 dB (A)
Belasting		44 / 47 dB (A)

	30 dB stil 40 dB(A) hoorbaar 50 dB(A) luid
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-2%	9%	2%	-9%	-1%
off / environment *	29	30 -3%	28.8 1%	30 -3%	29 -0%	29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=338) -1%
Idle Minimum *	30	32 -7%	28.8 4%	30 -0%	33 -10%	31.4 (28 - 42, n=761) -5%
Idle Average *	32	34 -6%	28.8 10%	31 3%	34 -6%	32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=761) -2%
Idle Maximum *	34	36 -6%	29.4 14%	34 -0%	40 -18%	34.6 (28 - 52, n=761) -2%
Load Average *	44	42 5%	35.7 19%	43 2%	47 -7%	40.8 (30.1 - 58, n=762) 7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	46	44 4%	42.5 8%	42 9%	51 -11%
Load Maximum *	47	48 -2%	45 4%	44 6%	53 -13%	48.2 (38.9 - 64.1, n=762) -3%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


44 °C	48 °C	47 °C
45 °C	49 °C	45 °C
38 °C	39 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 49 °C
Gemiddelde: 43.7 °C


58 °C	58 °C	44 °C
55 °C	56 °C	44 °C
44 °C	43 °C	41 °C

Maximum: 58 °C
Gemiddelde: 49.2 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 42 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


33 °C	33 °C	33 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C
28 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.2 °C


33 °C	33 °C	31 °C
32 °C	33 °C	31 °C
28 °C	27 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.7 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 26 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Belasting

Inactief

Witcher 3


43 °C	48 °C	46 °C
45 °C	47 °C	43 °C
37 °C	38 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Gemiddelde: 42.8 °C


56 °C	59 °C	46 °C
55 °C	57 °C	46 °C
43 °C	43 °C	41 °C

Maximum: 59 °C
Gemiddelde: 49.6 °C

Stroomadapter (max.) 43 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).

	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H	Average of class Gaming
Heat		2%	14%	11%	1%	8%
Maximum Upper Side *	49	56 -14%	49 -0%	49 -0%	54 -10%	45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=726) 6%
Maximum Bottom *	58	66 -14%	49 16%	63 -9%	60 -3%	49.6 (25.9 - 78, n=724) 14%
Idle Upper Side *	33	27 18%	25.4 23%	24 27%	30 9%	30.8 (21.6 - 46.8, n=678) 7%
Idle Bottom *	33	27 18%	27.2 18%	25 24%	30 9%	31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=676) 4%

* ... kleiner is beter

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik

Uit / Standby	0.3 / 1.7 Watt
Inactief	16 / 22 / 32 Watt
Belasting	89 / 173 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		11%	18%	23%	-7%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	16	16 -0%	10.4 35%	7 56%	17 -6%	19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=722) -21%
Idle Average *	22	18 18%	14.6 34%	11 50%	20 9%	24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=722) -13%
Idle Maximum *	32	23 28%	16.3 49%	20 37%	29 9%	30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=722) 6%
Load Average *	89	88 1%	88.5 1%	98 -10%	112 -26%	104 (14.1 - 319, n=713) -17%
Load Maximum *	173	167 3%	182.4 -5%	182 -5%	211 -22%	173 (21.9 - 590, n=712) -0%
Witcher 3 ultra *	147	120 18%	155.4 -6%	132 10%	152 -3%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur

Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)		5h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		3h 10min
Belast (maximale helderheid)		1h 21min

	Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh	Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh	Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 80 Wh	MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 50 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Batterijduur		93%	72%	47%	-34%	12%
Reader / Idle	335	549 64%	682 104%	507 51%	213 -36%	349 (39 - 1174, n=681) 4%
WiFi v1.3	190	382 101%	387 104%	362 91%	157 -17%	259 (78 - 622, n=387) 36%
Load	81	174 115%	88 9%	81 0%	42 -48%	78.9 (18 - 202, n=648) -3%
H.264		364		356		257 (88 - 508, n=149)

Pro

+ compacte behuizing

+ zeer goede prestaties

+ metalen oppervlakken

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ slanke beeldschermranden

+ G-Sync

+ 144 Hz

Contra

- irritant opstartgeluid (kan worden gedeactiveerd in het BIOS)

- beperkte onderhoudsmogelijkheden

- middelmatige batterijlevensduur

- geen Optimus

Predator Triton 500, testmodel geleverd door Acer Germany

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Acer Predator Triton 500 komt net tekort voor een "zeer goede" beoordeling. De 15-inch notebook voldoet aan bijna alle criteria die een moderne gaming-notebook onderscheidt van de concurrentie. Naast de smalle beeldschermranden en de dunne behuizing, willen we hier ook het 144 Hz-beeldscherm met G-Sync vermelden.

De Triton 500 heeft ook geen gebrek aan prestaties. Onze testversie met een Core i7-8750H en GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q kan moeiteloos omgaan met elke huidige game op Full HD-resolutie.

Het is echter voor ons onbegrijpelijk waarom Acer geen gebruik maakt van de geïntegreerde grafische kaart. Wat mobiliteit betreft zou Optimus absoluut een voordeel zijn. We zien extra zwakke punten op het gebied van onderhoudsmogelijkheden. Het ontwerp van de binnenkant is zodanig dat kopers tot vrijwel geen enkele component toegang hebben (prioriteit: opslagstations en RAM).