Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Acer Predator Triton 500 (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) Laptop

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, 17-02-2019

Nauwelijks iets te klagen. Met de Predator Triton 500 presenteert Acer een uiterst compacte gamingnotebook die ondanks de kleine afmetingen krachtige componenten biedt. Naast een Intel hexa-core processor, is ook de gloednieuwe GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q high-end GPU van Nvidia een echte krachtpatser.

Acer Predator Triton 500 (Predator Triton Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 735 MHz, Geheugen: 6000 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 417.71
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB DDR4-2666, dual channel, alle slots bezet
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0), 512 GB 
, NVMe SSDs; slots: 2x M.2 Type 2280
Geluidskaart
Realtek Unknown @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Verbindingen
3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: 1x koptelefoon, 1x microfoon
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Killer E3000 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10MBit), Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW) (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 18 x 359 x 255
Batterij
82 Wh, 5400 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cellen
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2.0, Toetsenbord: chiclet, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 180 Watt stroomadapter, diverse tools, XSplit Gamecaster testversie, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.144 kg
Prijs
2600 EUR
Links
Acer startpagina
Acer laptopsectie
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 1.8 kg360 mm 268 mm 15.8 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg
Linkerkant: stroomaansluiting, RJ45-LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, microfoon, koptelefoon
Linkerkant: stroomaansluiting, RJ45-LAN, USB-A 3.0, HDMI, microfoon, koptelefoon
Rechterkant: Thunderbolt 3, mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB-A 3.0, Kensington lock
Rechterkant: Thunderbolt 3, mini-DisplayPort, 2x USB-A 3.0, Kensington lock

Top 10 Testrapporten

» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks 
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €120
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €300
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Convertibles
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Windows-Tablets
» Top 10 Phablets (>5.5-inch)
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones (≤5-inch)
» Best Geteste Notebook Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000Notebookcheck's Beste Notebook-Beeldschermen
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼99% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s ∼98%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
660 MBit/s ∼96% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (132 - 702, n=203)
593 MBit/s ∼87% -12%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
693 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s ∼98% 0%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
662 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (131 - 721, n=203)
538 MBit/s ∼78% -21%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
280
cd/m²		298
cd/m²		290
cd/m²
296
cd/m²		304
cd/m²		312
cd/m²
287
cd/m²		306
cd/m²		314
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 314 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 298.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 89 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 304 cd/m²
Contrast: 1126:1 (Zwart: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.66 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2, calibrated: 1.72
ΔE Greyscale 5.53 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.5
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
-63%
-57%
-67%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (4, 4)
16.4 (8.8, 7.6)
-105%
16.8 (9.2, 7.6)
-110%
17.6 (9.2, 8.4)
-120%
7.4 (3.8, 3.6)
7%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 (6, 5.2)
13.6 (8.4, 5.2)
-21%
11.6 (7.2, 4.4)
-4%
12.8 (7.6, 5.2)
-14%
10 (4.4, 5.6)
11%
PWM Frequency
Screen
15%
7%
14%
11%
Brightness middle
304
250
-18%
314.7
4%
254
-16%
294
-3%
Brightness
299
235
-21%
312
4%
262
-12%
275
-8%
Brightness Distribution
89
85
-4%
90
1%
89
0%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.27
0.29
-7%
0.38
-41%
0.22
19%
0.24
11%
Contrast
1126
862
-23%
828
-26%
1155
3%
1225
9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.66
1.46
69%
2.56
45%
2.37
49%
2.57
45%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.65
2.47
74%
4.89
49%
4.71
51%
4.88
49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.72
1.71
1%
1.84
-7%
2.14
-24%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.53
1.27
77%
3.4
39%
1.58
71%
2.41
56%
Gamma
2.5 88%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.48 89%
2.5 88%
CCT
8028 81%
6749 96%
6435 101%
6785 96%
6370 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60
0%
60.7
1%
60
0%
59
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
93
0%
94.6
2%
92
-1%
91
-2%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
-24% / 2%
-25% / -3%
-27% / 2%
10% / 11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ
De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
   ↔    Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
11.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6 ms stijging
↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
   ↔    Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4 ms stijging
↘ 4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.98 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
10.98 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
176 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1019 Points
Help
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø981 (927.26-1023.23)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points ∼100%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
175 Points ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (79 - 212, n=445)
153 Points ∼87% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points ∼100% +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1120 Points ∼97% +10%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
1053 Points ∼91% +3%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points ∼88%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 1979, n=446)
775 Points ∼67% -24%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
2 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.98 Points ∼99%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
1.89 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.71 - 2.38, n=413)
1.684 Points ∼84% -15%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
Intel Core i7-8750H
12.44 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Intel Core i7-8750H
11.82 Points ∼95% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
10.98 Points ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.13 - 21.4, n=514)
7.33 Points ∼59% -33%
PCMark 10 - Score
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points ∼92% -8%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5170 Points ∼88% -12%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5095 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7171, n=143)
5062 Points ∼86% -14%
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
AS SSD
-16%
1%
-3%
-21%
Score Total
3770
2722
-28%
4079
8%
4122
9%
3294
-13%
Score Write
1435
957
-33%
2010
40%
2051
43%
1515
6%
Score Read
1558
1180
-24%
1362
-13%
1346
-14%
1161
-25%
4K Write
107.21
107.12
0%
110.72
3%
107.15
0%
103.63
-3%
4K Read
38.7
55.04
42%
52.31
35%
48.94
26%
40.02
3%
Seq Write
2492.02
1471.06
-41%
1822.26
-27%
1834.04
-26%
1260.72
-49%
Seq Read
2913.4
2112.83
-27%
1839.67
-37%
1266.1
-57%
903.24
-69%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2902 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 338.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 298.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2107 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2455 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 38.82 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 93.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points ∼81% -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points ∼79% -21%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18687 Points ∼67% -33%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
18296 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=547)
12476 Points ∼44% -56%
3DMark 11 Performance
20149 punten
Help
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0); The Witcher 3: Ø76.1 (70-81)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8; The Witcher 3: Ø51.3 (44-61)
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; The Witcher 3: Ø49.5 (46-53)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; The Witcher 3: Ø50.3 (45-54)
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
76.5 (min: 63) fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
68.9 fps ∼90% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
58.3 (min: 48) fps ∼76% -24%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
52.7 fps ∼69% -31%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
49.2 fps ∼64% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=247)
46.7 fps ∼61% -39%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
136 (min: 104) fps ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
130.1 fps ∼96% -4%
MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
95.5 fps ∼70% -30%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
90.4 fps ∼66% -34%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
86.5 fps ∼64% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (11.1 - 194, n=208)
79.4 fps ∼58% -42%
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 13676.5fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 134129fps
Assassin´s Creed Origins (2017) 6562fps

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
30 / 32 / 34 dB (A)
Belasting
44 / 47 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
-2%
9%
2%
-9%
-1%
off / environment *
29
30
-3%
28.8
1%
30
-3%
29
-0%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=249)
-1%
Idle Minimum *
30
32
-7%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
33
-10%
31.5 (28 - 41.7, n=672)
-5%
Idle Average *
32
34
-6%
28.8
10%
31
3%
34
-6%
32.8 (28 - 46.6, n=672)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
34
36
-6%
29.4
14%
34
-0%
40
-18%
34.7 (28 - 50.4, n=672)
-2%
Load Average *
44
42
5%
35.7
19%
43
2%
47
-7%
40.5 (30.3 - 58, n=673)
8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46
44
4%
42.5
8%
42
9%
51
-11%
Load Maximum *
47
48
-2%
45
4%
44
6%
53
-13%
47.7 (38.9 - 64, n=673)
-1%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 44 °C48 °C47 °C 
 45 °C49 °C45 °C 
 38 °C39 °C38 °C 
Maximum: 49 °C
Gemiddelde: 43.7 °C
58 °C58 °C44 °C
55 °C56 °C44 °C
44 °C43 °C41 °C
Maximum: 58 °C
Gemiddelde: 49.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  42 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 41.7 °C / 107 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-10.3 °C / -18.5 F).
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
2%
14%
11%
1%
9%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
56
-14%
49
-0%
49
-0%
54
-10%
45.6 (28 - 68.8, n=638)
7%
Maximum Bottom *
58
66
-14%
49
16%
63
-9%
60
-3%
49.2 (25.9 - 78, n=636)
15%
Idle Upper Side *
33
27
18%
25.4
23%
24
27%
30
9%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=589)
7%
Idle Bottom *
33
27
18%
27.2
18%
25
24%
30
9%
31.5 (21.1 - 50.3, n=587)
5%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.542.72540.138.23130.133.44034.142.15037.532.6632732.380313210031.339.212524.845.216023.450.720022.555.22502461.331520.967.640019.165.350018.161.963017.767.280017.371.6100016.969.4125018.97016001869.6200016.771.3250017.270315017.170.640001767500017.363.4630017.165.5800017.167.21000017.164.21250017.157.61600016.852.9SPL29.980.7N1.451.1median 17.3median 65.5Delta1.96.434.433.32930.527.227.627.131.92729.42532.324.83925.241.222.438.322.845.721.753.421.357.219.860.719.56519.470.119.475.519.377.119.37619.374.619.472.919.469.319.568.719.763.519.764.619.465.819.364.919.563.419.858.619.954.219.648.431.683.21.654.2median 19.5median 64.60.67.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Predator Triton 500Acer Predator Triton 700
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Acer Predator Triton 500 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Acer Predator Triton 700 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.7 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 16 / 22 / 32 Watt
Belasting midlight 89 / 173 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
11%
18%
23%
-7%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
16
16
-0%
10.4
35%
7
56%
17
-6%
20 (3.8 - 113, n=633)
-25%
Idle Average *
22
18
18%
14.6
34%
11
50%
20
9%
25.5 (6.8 - 119, n=633)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
32
23
28%
16.3
49%
20
37%
29
9%
30.6 (8.3 - 122, n=633)
4%
Load Average *
89
88
1%
88.5
1%
98
-10%
112
-26%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=624)
-17%
Load Maximum *
173
167
3%
182.4
-5%
182
-5%
211
-22%
168 (21.9 - 590, n=623)
3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
147
120
18%
155.4
-6%
132
10%
152
-3%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
5h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 10min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 21min
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 94.24 Wh		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, 80 Wh		MSI GS65 8RF-019DE Stealth Thin
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 82 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, 50 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
93%
72%
47%
-34%
10%
Reader / Idle
335
549
64%
682
104%
507
51%
213
-36%
334 (39 - 1174, n=614)
0%
WiFi v1.3
190
382
101%
387
104%
362
91%
157
-17%
251 (78 - 622, n=295)
32%
Load
81
174
115%
88
9%
81
0%
42
-48%
78.6 (18 - 202, n=581)
-3%
H.264
364
356
245 (88 - 506, n=130)

Pro

+ compacte behuizing
+ zeer goede prestaties
+ metalen oppervlakken
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ slanke beeldschermranden
+ G-Sync
+ 144 Hz

Contra

- irritant opstartgeluid (kan worden gedeactiveerd in het BIOS)
- beperkte onderhoudsmogelijkheden
- middelmatige batterijlevensduur
- geen Optimus
Predator Triton 500, testmodel geleverd door Acer Germany
Predator Triton 500, testmodel geleverd door Acer Germany

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Acer Predator Triton 500 komt net tekort voor een "zeer goede" beoordeling. De 15-inch notebook voldoet aan bijna alle criteria die een moderne gaming-notebook onderscheidt van de concurrentie. Naast de smalle beeldschermranden en de dunne behuizing, willen we hier ook het 144 Hz-beeldscherm met G-Sync vermelden.

De Triton 500 heeft ook geen gebrek aan prestaties. Onze testversie met een Core i7-8750H en GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q kan moeiteloos omgaan met elke huidige game op Full HD-resolutie.

Het is echter voor ons onbegrijpelijk waarom Acer geen gebruik maakt van de geïntegreerde grafische kaart. Wat mobiliteit betreft zou Optimus absoluut een voordeel zijn. We zien extra zwakke punten op het gebied van onderhoudsmogelijkheden. Het ontwerp van de binnenkant is zodanig dat kopers tot vrijwel geen enkele component toegang hebben (prioriteit: opslagstations en RAM).

 

Desondanks is de Triton 500 naar onze mening aanzienlijk meer succesvol dan de oude Triton 700.

Acer Predator Triton 500 - 14-02-2019 v6
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
80 / 98 → 82%
Toetsenbord
83%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
62 / 81 → 76%
Gewicht
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Batterij
70%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
98%
Applicatie-performance
100%
Temperatuur
75 / 95 → 79%
Luidheid
75 / 90 → 83%
Audio
75%
Gemiddelde
79%
87%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Acer Predator Triton 500
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Acer Predator Triton 500 (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q) Laptop
Florian Glaser, 2019-02-17 (Update: 2019-02-17)