Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Smartphone

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, 07-12-2018

Van oud naar nieuw. De Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 maakt gebruik van beproefde technologie: een glijdend mechanisme en een vrijwel randloos en, nog belangrijker, inkeping-vrij ontwerp. Maar het nieuwste model van de Mi Mix-serie heeft ook nog een andere verrassing in petto.

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Mi Serie)
Grafische kaart
Geheugen
8192 MB 
Beeldscherm
6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, capacitief multi-touch beeldscherm, AMOLED, Super AMOLED, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 110.3 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type C, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: kompas, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, versnellingsmeter, OTG, status LED, VoLTE, WiFi-Calling, Miracast
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900MHz; UMTS 1900 / 2100 / 850 / 900MHz; FD-LTE 2100 (band 1) / 1800 (band 3) / 2600 (band 7) / 900(band 8) / 1900(band 2) / 1700(band 4) / 850(band 5) / 700(band 17) / 800(band 20); TD-LTE 2600(band 38) / 2300(band 40) / 2500(band, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.8 x 157.8 x 74.6
Batterij
3200 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix Dual: 12MP + 12MP; Exmor-RS CMOS sensor; f/1.8; 3840x2160 @ 30 fps, 1920x1080 @ 60 fps, 1280x720 @ 120 fps
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix Dual: 24MP + 2MP
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono luidspreker, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Qi charging pad, modulaire CN stroomadapter, 3.5-mm-audiopoort-naar-USB-Type-C adapter, beschermhoes, microUSB kabel, MIUI, 12 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
218 g, Voeding: 68 g
Prijs
470 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3

Size Comparison

162 mm 77 mm 7.98 mm 199 g157.8 mm 74.6 mm 8.8 mm 218 g158.1 mm 73.8 mm 8.5 mm 189 g156.6 mm 73.9 mm 9.7 mm 188 g156.7 mm 74.2 mm 9.4 mm 186 g157.5 mm 74.8 mm 8.2 mm 185 g156.9 mm 72.4 mm 8.6 mm 189 g154.9 mm 74.8 mm 7.6 mm 175 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
685 (min: 657, max: 705) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
629 (min: 621, max: 638) MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 (min: 532, max: 642) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
491 (min: 100, max: 534) MBit/s ∼72% -28%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Oppo Find X
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
530 (min: 467, max: 568) MBit/s ∼77% -23%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
Adreno 630, 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
523 MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=351)
219 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
696 (min: 647, max: 714) MBit/s ∼100% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 289, max: 805) MBit/s ∼95% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 507, max: 704) MBit/s ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
615 MBit/s ∼88% -7%
HTC U12 Plus
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
573 MBit/s ∼82% -14%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
Adreno 630, 845, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
524 MBit/s ∼75% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼75% -22%
OnePlus 6T
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
474 (min: 241, max: 497) MBit/s ∼68% -29%
Oppo Find X
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
450 (min: 167, max: 526) MBit/s ∼65% -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=351)
210 MBit/s ∼30% -68%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø684 (657-705)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø663 (507-704)
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
GPS Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
fotomodus
fotomodus
dubbele zoom
dubbele zoom
portretmodus
portretmodus
portretmodus
portretmodus
fotomodus
fotomodus
nachtmodus
nachtmodus
fotomodus
fotomodus
dubbele zoom
dubbele zoom
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
587
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 599 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 592.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.12 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 96 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 599 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.2
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.4
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
Super AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.2
Oppo Find X
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.42
Vivo Nex Ultimate
Super AMOLED, 2316x1080, 6.59
OnePlus 6T
Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.41
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
HTC U12 Plus
Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.3
Screen
-56%
-97%
-161%
-25%
-20%
-8%
1%
Brightness middle
599
429
-28%
427
-29%
356
-41%
437
-27%
565
-6%
395
-34%
576
-4%
Brightness
593
432
-27%
432
-27%
352
-41%
442
-25%
571
-4%
402
-32%
582
-2%
Brightness Distribution
96
88
-8%
87
-9%
95
-1%
95
-1%
96
0%
90
-6%
90
-6%
Black Level *
0.37
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.4
3.39
-142%
5.37
-284%
7.08
-406%
2.21
-58%
2.3
-64%
1.6
-14%
1.3
7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.2
5.25
-64%
7.51
-135%
14.1
-341%
4.27
-33%
4.8
-50%
3.4
-6%
3.5
-9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
3.3
-65%
4
-100%
4.7
-135%
2.1
-5%
1.9
5%
1.1
45%
1.6
20%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.238 98%
2.243 98%
2.096 105%
2.307 95%
2.16 102%
2.14 103%
2.18 101%
CCT
6496 100%
7135 91%
6851 95%
7297 89%
6353 102%
6332 103%
6536 99%
6561 99%
Contrast
1068

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 240.4 Hz

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 240.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) .

De frequentie van 240.4 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9813 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
12.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 9.4 ms stijging
↘ 2.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
7.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2.8 ms stijging
↘ 4.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
13374 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
14299 Points ∼100% +7%
Oppo Find X
13817 Points ∼97% +3%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
13666 Points ∼96% +2%
OnePlus 6T
13341 Points ∼93% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43% -54%
HTC U12 Plus
12493 Points ∼87% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8938 Points ∼63% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (10876 - 14489, n=23)
13596 Points ∼95% +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1077 - 21070, n=239)
4593 Points ∼32% -66%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8634 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8548 Points ∼85% -1%
Oppo Find X
7983 Points ∼80% -8%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
9136 Points ∼91% +6%
OnePlus 6T
8995 Points ∼90% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼89% +4%
HTC U12 Plus
8812 Points ∼88% +2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
10024 Points ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7754 - 9231, n=25)
8690 Points ∼87% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1634 - 11598, n=291)
4410 Points ∼44% -49%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2333 Points ∼62%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2441 Points ∼65% +5%
Oppo Find X
2330 Points ∼62% 0%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
2464 Points ∼65% +6%
OnePlus 6T
2384 Points ∼63% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼100% +62%
HTC U12 Plus
2429 Points ∼64% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
3378 Points ∼89% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2272 - 2500, n=25)
2417 Points ∼64% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (590 - 4824, n=292)
1293 Points ∼34% -45%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8326 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7360 Points ∼75% -12%
Oppo Find X
9868 Points ∼100% +19%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
7580 Points ∼77% -9%
OnePlus 6T
8487 Points ∼86% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼54% -36%
HTC U12 Plus
8601 Points ∼87% +3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
9225 Points ∼93% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7983 - 9868, n=26)
8051 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2828 - 9868, n=302)
4747 Points ∼48% -43%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
10052 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
8967 Points ∼68% -11%
Oppo Find X
13211 Points ∼100% +31%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
7998 Points ∼61% -20%
OnePlus 6T
10590 Points ∼80% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼44% -42%
HTC U12 Plus
10264 Points ∼78% +2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
12535 Points ∼95% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=24)
10137 Points ∼77% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3977 - 13531, n=470)
5179 Points ∼39% -48%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2802 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2227 Points ∼51% -21%
Oppo Find X
3089 Points ∼71% +10%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
2577 Points ∼59% -8%
OnePlus 6T
3681 Points ∼84% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2546 Points ∼58% -9%
HTC U12 Plus
2947 Points ∼68% +5%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4364 Points ∼100% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2215 - 3764, n=26)
3108 Points ∼71% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (939 - 4439, n=317)
1763 Points ∼40% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4480 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4209 Points ∼72% -6%
Oppo Find X
5678 Points ∼97% +27%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
5689 Points ∼97% +27%
OnePlus 6T
5877 Points ∼100% +31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3792 Points ∼65% -15%
HTC U12 Plus
4450 Points ∼76% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4250 Points ∼72% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4133 - 8206, n=26)
5426 Points ∼92% +21%
Average of class Smartphone (138 - 8206, n=317)
1491 Points ∼25% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3846 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3512 Points ∼68% -9%
Oppo Find X
4765 Points ∼92% +24%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
4485 Points ∼86% +17%
OnePlus 6T
5189 Points ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3420 Points ∼66% -11%
HTC U12 Plus
3997 Points ∼77% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4275 Points ∼82% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3512 - 5200, n=26)
4611 Points ∼89% +20%
Average of class Smartphone (170 - 5200, n=320)
1392 Points ∼27% -64%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3060 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2145 Points ∼49% -30%
Oppo Find X
3024 Points ∼69% -1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
2110 Points ∼48% -31%
OnePlus 6T
3374 Points ∼77% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2561 Points ∼58% -16%
HTC U12 Plus
2656 Points ∼60% -13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4407 Points ∼100% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2110 - 3763, n=25)
3074 Points ∼70% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (375 - 4493, n=333)
1733 Points ∼39% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8245 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
5922 Points ∼71% -28%
Oppo Find X
8357 Points ∼100% +1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
7823 Points ∼93% -5%
OnePlus 6T
8397 Points ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4797 Points ∼57% -42%
HTC U12 Plus
6419 Points ∼76% -22%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5854 Points ∼70% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5228 - 8451, n=25)
7609 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (131 - 14951, n=333)
2053 Points ∼24% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
6054 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4232 Points ∼67% -30%
Oppo Find X
6005 Points ∼95% -1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
4884 Points ∼77% -19%
OnePlus 6T
6310 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4018 Points ∼64% -34%
HTC U12 Plus
4882 Points ∼77% -19%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5456 Points ∼86% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4034 - 6568, n=25)
5717 Points ∼91% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (159 - 7856, n=334)
1744 Points ∼28% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
2653 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2118 Points ∼51% -20%
Oppo Find X
3132 Points ∼75% +18%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
3271 Points ∼78% +23%
OnePlus 6T
3537 Points ∼85% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼59% -7%
HTC U12 Plus
3197 Points ∼76% +21%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4183 Points ∼100% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2118 - 3703, n=25)
3225 Points ∼77% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (918 - 4216, n=393)
1696 Points ∼41% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4223 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3742 Points ∼71% -11%
Oppo Find X
5169 Points ∼99% +22%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
5171 Points ∼99% +22%
OnePlus 6T
5241 Points ∼100% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼68% -15%
HTC U12 Plus
3488 Points ∼67% -17%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4206 Points ∼80% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5246, n=25)
4902 Points ∼94% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 5246, n=395)
1221 Points ∼23% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3677 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3197 Points ∼68% -13%
Oppo Find X
4516 Points ∼95% +23%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
4580 Points ∼97% +25%
OnePlus 6T
4734 Points ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -11%
HTC U12 Plus
3419 Points ∼72% -7%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4201 Points ∼89% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3197 - 4734, n=25)
4380 Points ∼93% +19%
Average of class Smartphone (184 - 4734, n=403)
1171 Points ∼25% -68%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3221 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
2176 Points ∼52% -32%
Oppo Find X
3197 Points ∼77% -1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
2806 Points ∼68% -13%
OnePlus 6T
3483 Points ∼84% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼60% -23%
HTC U12 Plus
2774 Points ∼67% -14%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4150 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2124 - 3668, n=25)
3106 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 4215, n=427)
1595 Points ∼38% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8236 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6554 Points ∼79% -20%
Oppo Find X
8193 Points ∼99% -1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
8203 Points ∼99% 0%
OnePlus 6T
8272 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼56% -44%
HTC U12 Plus
5637 Points ∼68% -32%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
5305 Points ∼64% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8312, n=25)
7733 Points ∼93% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (43 - 8312, n=427)
1659 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
6118 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
4529 Points ∼71% -26%
Oppo Find X
6087 Points ∼96% -1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
5747 Points ∼91% -6%
OnePlus 6T
6336 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼61% -36%
HTC U12 Plus
4585 Points ∼72% -25%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4996 Points ∼79% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4363 - 6454, n=25)
5790 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (55 - 6454, n=435)
1424 Points ∼22% -77%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
35987 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
30765 Points ∼84% -15%
Oppo Find X
35009 Points ∼95% -3%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
34800 Points ∼95% -3%
OnePlus 6T
35022 Points ∼95% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼71% -27%
HTC U12 Plus
33810 Points ∼92% -6%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
36755 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (15614 - 37475, n=25)
33213 Points ∼90% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3958 - 37475, n=586)
13218 Points ∼36% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
83976 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
77003 Points ∼91% -8%
Oppo Find X
83168 Points ∼98% -1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
80183 Points ∼94% -5%
OnePlus 6T
84998 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼55% -44%
HTC U12 Plus
81726 Points ∼96% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
67730 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (53794 - 84998, n=25)
80218 Points ∼94% -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1152 - 162695, n=586)
18733 Points ∼22% -78%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
64627 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
57711 Points ∼89% -11%
Oppo Find X
63695 Points ∼99% -1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
62167 Points ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 6T
64534 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼61% -39%
HTC U12 Plus
62152 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
57047 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (34855 - 65330, n=25)
60903 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (2915 - 77599, n=587)
15750 Points ∼24% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
152 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
102 fps ∼67% -33%
Oppo Find X
146 fps ∼96% -4%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
151 fps ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 6T
152 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼97% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
98 fps ∼64% -36%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
120 fps ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 152, n=26)
142 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 251, n=610)
32.6 fps ∼21% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
60 fps ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
58 fps ∼93% -3%
Oppo Find X
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
60 fps ∼96% 0%
OnePlus 6T
60 fps ∼96% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼96% 0%
HTC U12 Plus
59 fps ∼95% -2%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
61 fps ∼98% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (58 - 89, n=25)
62.2 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (6.9 - 120, n=613)
25.9 fps ∼42% -57%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
81 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
54 fps ∼65% -33%
Oppo Find X
79 fps ∼95% -2%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
83 fps ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼71% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼89% -9%
HTC U12 Plus
72 fps ∼87% -11%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
73 fps ∼88% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (54 - 83, n=25)
72.8 fps ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone (2.2 - 132, n=531)
17.6 fps ∼21% -78%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
56 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
51 fps ∼86% -9%
Oppo Find X
58 fps ∼98% +4%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
59 fps ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% -20%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼59% -37%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
42 fps ∼71% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (33 - 75, n=25)
54.5 fps ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (4.1 - 115, n=535)
16.7 fps ∼28% -70%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
59 fps ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
32 fps ∼53% -46%
Oppo Find X
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
60 fps ∼100% +2%
OnePlus 6T
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼78% -20%
HTC U12 Plus
39 fps ∼65% -34%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
29 fps ∼48% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=26)
53.8 fps ∼90% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2.6 - 88, n=392)
14.8 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
50 fps ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
29 fps ∼49% -42%
Oppo Find X
59 fps ∼100% +18%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
55 fps ∼93% +10%
OnePlus 6T
53 fps ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼41% -52%
HTC U12 Plus
31 fps ∼53% -38%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
26 fps ∼44% -48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=25)
45.9 fps ∼78% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (3.5 - 110, n=395)
14.3 fps ∼24% -71%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
20 fps ∼91%
OnePlus 6T
22 fps ∼100% +10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
19 fps ∼86% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12 - 25, n=15)
19.3 fps ∼88% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (0.61 - 59, n=97)
9.25 fps ∼42% -54%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
31 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 6T
14 fps ∼45% -55%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
13 fps ∼42% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (11 - 31, n=15)
15.3 fps ∼49% -51%
Average of class Smartphone (0.21 - 31, n=97)
6.32 fps ∼20% -80%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
20 fps ∼59%
OnePlus 6T
34 fps ∼100% +70%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
18 fps ∼53% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (16 - 40, n=15)
29.4 fps ∼86% +47%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 59, n=97)
13.8 fps ∼41% -31%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
30 fps ∼81%
OnePlus 6T
37 fps ∼100% +23%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
33 fps ∼89% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (29 - 38, n=14)
35 fps ∼95% +17%
Average of class Smartphone (0.77 - 63, n=96)
15.1 fps ∼41% -50%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
35 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
25 fps ∼71% -29%
Oppo Find X
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
35 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 6T
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼80% -20%
HTC U12 Plus
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
31 fps ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (25 - 35, n=25)
33.4 fps ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 54, n=322)
10.1 fps ∼29% -71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
30 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
24 fps ∼73% -20%
Oppo Find X
29 fps ∼88% -3%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
33 fps ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 6T
31 fps ∼94% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼42% -53%
HTC U12 Plus
20 fps ∼61% -33%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
16 fps ∼48% -47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (13 - 37, n=25)
28 fps ∼85% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (9.4 - 58, n=325)
9.11 fps ∼28% -70%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
292798 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
288062 Points ∼96% -2%
Oppo Find X
283346 Points ∼94% -3%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
286241 Points ∼95% -2%
OnePlus 6T
294488 Points ∼98% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼83% -14%
HTC U12 Plus
255739 Points ∼85% -13%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
300617 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=25)
276911 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (41483 - 348178, n=215)
122050 Points ∼41% -58%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
228173 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
232931 Points ∼93% +2%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
229991 Points ∼92% +1%
OnePlus 6T
228939 Points ∼91% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼89% -3%
HTC U12 Plus
221971 Points ∼88% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
250848 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points ∼90% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (23275 - 273655, n=431)
80811 Points ∼32% -65%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
1386 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
1288 Points ∼90% -7%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
1009 Points ∼70% -27%
OnePlus 6T
1398 Points ∼97% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼77% -20%
HTC U12 Plus
1437 Points ∼100% +4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
1424 Points ∼99% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1009 - 1613, n=24)
1343 Points ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1731, n=543)
714 Points ∼50% -48%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
7891 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
7965 Points ∼100% +1%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
7887 Points ∼99% 0%
OnePlus 6T
7969 Points ∼100% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼80% -19%
HTC U12 Plus
7945 Points ∼100% +1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6273 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5846 - 8001, n=24)
7784 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 15969, n=543)
1806 Points ∼23% -77%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3791 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3521 Points ∼56% -7%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
4798 Points ∼76% +27%
OnePlus 6T
4344 Points ∼69% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼42% -31%
HTC U12 Plus
3641 Points ∼58% -4%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
6283 Points ∼100% +66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 5296, n=24)
3602 Points ∼57% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 6283, n=543)
1329 Points ∼21% -65%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
8146 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
6556 Points ∼76% -20%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
8252 Points ∼96% +1%
OnePlus 6T
8156 Points ∼95% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼75% -21%
HTC U12 Plus
7862 Points ∼91% -3%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
8604 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4417 - 8613, n=24)
7618 Points ∼89% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 12202, n=543)
2664 Points ∼31% -67%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
4287 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3923 Points ∼84% -8%
Vivo Nex Ultimate
4213 Points ∼90% -2%
OnePlus 6T
4458 Points ∼95% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼70% -23%
HTC U12 Plus
4252 Points ∼91% -1%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4687 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3291 - 4693, n=24)
4091 Points ∼87% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (150 - 6097, n=547)
1320 Points ∼28% -69%

Legende

 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Oppo Find X Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Vivo Nex Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
OnePlus 6T Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 980, ARM Mali-G76 MP10, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
109.18 Points ∼100% +27%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
87.036 Points ∼80% +1%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
86.123 Points ∼79% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
85.976 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
80.876 Points ∼74% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=26)
77.2 Points ∼71% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼64% -19%
Oppo Find X (Chrome 69)
64.809 Points ∼59% -25%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 273, n=468)
37.7 Points ∼35% -56%
Vivo Nex Ultimate (Chrome 67)
22.509 Points ∼21% -74%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
23285 Points ∼100% +41%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
16824 Points ∼72% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
16489 Points ∼71%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
16285 Points ∼70% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=26)
15508 Points ∼67% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼63% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
14617 Points ∼63% -11%
Oppo Find X (Chrome 69)
13276 Points ∼57% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 43280, n=604)
5843 Points ∼25% -65%
Vivo Nex Ultimate (Chrome 67)
3991 Points ∼17% -76%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Vivo Nex Ultimate (Chrome 67)
11203.6 ms * ∼100% -387%
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=623)
11157 ms * ∼100% -385%
Oppo Find X (Chrome 69)
3147 ms * ∼28% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=26)
2812 ms * ∼25% -22%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
2409.6 ms * ∼22% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
2316.8 ms * ∼21% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
2299.9 ms * ∼21%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
2281.6 ms * ∼20% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼18% +10%
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
1951.9 ms * ∼17% +15%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
124 Points ∼100% +31%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
101 Points ∼81% +6%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
95 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (19 - 103, n=17)
85 Points ∼69% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (24 - 161, n=84)
64.3 Points ∼52% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
64 Points ∼52% -33%
Vivo Nex Ultimate (Stock Browser)
19 Points ∼15% -80%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei Mate 20 Pro (Chrome 69)
334 Points ∼100% +28%
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼78% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
260 Points ∼78%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)
257 Points ∼77% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition (Chrome 69)
251 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (245 - 291, n=23)
235 Points ∼70% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼49% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (74 - 362, n=308)
117 Points ∼35% -55%
Vivo Nex Ultimate (Chrome 67)
96 Points ∼29% -63%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer EditionOppo Find XVivo Nex UltimateOnePlus 6TSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusHTC U12 PlusHuawei Mate 20 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
5%
15%
5%
6%
8%
106%
187%
94%
-50%
Random Write 4KB
19.54
22.65
16%
26.98
38%
22.1
13%
22
13%
22.74
16%
104.24
433%
157.84
708%
90.2 (19.5 - 250, n=24)
362%
17.8 (0.14 - 250, n=652)
-9%
Random Read 4KB
133.24
135.21
1%
145.87
9%
126.7
-5%
138.5
4%
129.68
-3%
118.14
-11%
157.42
18%
140 (117 - 158, n=24)
5%
41.2 (1.59 - 173, n=652)
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB
206.76
205.23
-1%
206.87
0%
228.4
10%
204.4
-1%
204.94
-1%
195.82
-5%
196.39
-5%
200 (183 - 212, n=24)
-3%
85.9 (2.99 - 253, n=652)
-58%
Sequential Read 256KB
674.98
691.65
2%
760.99
13%
687.2
2%
735.3
9%
818.69
21%
709.11
5%
853.28
26%
759 (427 - 912, n=24)
12%
241 (12.1 - 912, n=652)
-64%

PUBG Mobile

01020304050Tooltip
: Ø39.9 (39-41)

Asphalt 9 Legends

010203040Tooltip
: Ø29.6 (27-31)
Max. Belasting
 31.7 °C31.6 °C31.6 °C 
 31.7 °C30.9 °C31.3 °C 
 32 °C31.7 °C30.6 °C 
Maximum: 32 °C
Gemiddelde: 31.5 °C
28.9 °C30.6 °C30.8 °C
28.2 °C30.6 °C31.1 °C
28.1 °C30.3 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 31.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.9 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  26.3 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.6 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.739.62526.725.83128.722.44026.5295036.936.46326.725.48026.921.910022.323.812520.223.916017.741.220018.741.925019.248.831515.85540015.660.650013.964.363014.365.680014.866.5100013.466.9125014.370.1160014.571.9200013.873.6250013.674.9315014.174.9400014.174500014.976.763001572.9800015.269.81000014.973.41250014.766.11600014.753SPL26.784.8N0.859.7median 14.8median 66.5Delta1.711.930.32938.131.328.52831.428.536.634.224.628.624.126.520.523.11927.316.939.919.151.416.652.413.9551559.514.659.112.357.411.858.611.863.811.968.611.469.511.27011.573.311.370.510.968.710.568.610.76610.665.210.566.410.655.710.638.964.357.22480.516.810.40.545.3median 11.8median 59.52.28.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi Mix 3OnePlus 6T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 6T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.49 / 0.67 / 0.87 Watt
Belasting midlight 3.64 / 9.04 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Oppo Find X
3730 mAh
Vivo Nex Ultimate
4000 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-192%
-130%
-57%
-51%
-18%
-104%
-94%
-79%
-69%
Idle Minimum *
0.49
1.8
-267%
0.9
-84%
0.9
-84%
0.7
-43%
0.68
-39%
0.77
-57%
0.95
-94%
0.83 (0.42 - 1.8, n=25)
-69%
0.881 (0.2 - 3.4, n=684)
-80%
Idle Average *
0.67
2.9
-333%
1.9
-184%
1.5
-124%
1.1
-64%
0.95
-42%
2.18
-225%
2.17
-224%
1.703 (0.67 - 2.9, n=25)
-154%
1.73 (0.6 - 6.2, n=683)
-158%
Idle Maximum *
0.87
3.5
-302%
3.2
-268%
1.7
-95%
2.1
-141%
1.09
-25%
2.21
-154%
2.25
-159%
2.05 (0.87 - 3.5, n=25)
-136%
2.01 (0.74 - 6.6, n=684)
-131%
Load Average *
3.64
4.8
-32%
7.1
-95%
3.7
-2%
4.2
-15%
4.58
-26%
6.25
-72%
4.47
-23%
4.86 (3.56 - 7.41, n=25)
-34%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=678)
-12%
Load Maximum *
9.04
11.2
-24%
10.7
-18%
7.2
20%
8.3
8%
5.16
43%
10.16
-12%
6.15
32%
9.39 (6.2 - 12.3, n=25)
-4%
5.84 (1.2 - 14.2, n=678)
35%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
30h 10min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 56min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 14min
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition
3000 mAh
Oppo Find X
3730 mAh
Vivo Nex Ultimate
4000 mAh
OnePlus 6T
3700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
HTC U12 Plus
3500 mAh
Huawei Mate 20 Pro
4200 mAh
Batterijduur
-5%
-17%
23%
18%
-13%
-19%
13%
Reader / Idle
1810
1401
-23%
1925
6%
1936
7%
1343
-26%
1452
-20%
1747
-3%
H.264
836
921
10%
1133
36%
903
8%
674
-19%
464
-44%
854
2%
WiFi v1.3
719
694
-3%
596
-17%
1026
43%
865
20%
521
-28%
507
-29%
767
7%
Load
194
191
-2%
203
5%
261
35%
237
22%
230
19%
282
45%

Pro

+ geweldig OLED-beeldscherm
+ snelle Wi-Fi
+ ontwerp
+ hoogwaardige behuizing
+ goede camera's
+ nauwkeurige GPS
+ goede prestaties
+ wordt nauwelijks warm...

Contra

- ... maar soms wel thermisch beperkt
- gewicht
- Het schuifmechanisme is soms een beetje gammel
- USB 2.0
- Widevine niveau 3
- opslag niet uitbreidbaar
Getest: Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Testmodel geleverd door TradingShenzhen.
Getest: Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Testmodel geleverd door TradingShenzhen.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Mi Mix 3 is een zeer goede randloze smartphone die geen inkeping in het beeldscherm heeft. Met name het beeldscherm is een vooruitgang vergeleken met de Mi 8. De gebruikte beeldschermtechnologie van Xiaomi is uitstekend.

We waren verrast door de goede prestaties van de relatief kleine batterij. Onze batterijtest laat zien dat de Mi Mix 3 goede looptijden kan bieden dankzij het zeer beperkte energieverbruik. De meeste gebruikers houden het gemakkelijk een dag vol met één batterijlading.

De Mi Mix is een erg degelijke smartphone die vanwege zijn glijdende mechanisme misschien geen ideale reisgenoot voor iedereen is.

De Mi Mix 3 van Xiaomi heeft niet veel zwakke punten. Vanwege de glijdende mechanica heeft de high-end smartphone geen IP-certificering, is hij nogal zwaar en is hij waarschijnlijk gevoeliger voor valschade dan een "normale" smartphone met een monobloc-behuizing.

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 - 03-12-2018 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
87%
Toetsenbord
67 / 75 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
93%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
48 / 60 → 79%
Gewicht
88%
Batterij
95%
Beeldscherm
91%
Gaming-performance
69 / 63 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
76 / 70 → 100%
Temperatuur
94%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
82%
Gemiddelde
81%
89%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Smartphone
Marcus Herbrich, 2018-12- 7 (Update: 2018-12- 7)