Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Smartphone

Manuel Masiero, 03-06-2018

Ereklasse. Een Snapdragon 845 SoC, maximaal 8 GB RAM, een dual camera systeem en een 6-inch beeldscherm - met eersteklas componenten neemt de Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S het direct op tegen de grote merken zoals de Apple iPhone X. Ons testrapport vertelt of het huidige vlaggenschip van Xiaomi daadwerkelijk de high-end markt voor smartphones op zijn kop kan zetten.

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Mi Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 630
Geheugen
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4
Beeldscherm
5.99 inch 18:9, 2160 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, IPS, 81.9% scherm/behuizing verhouding, Corning Gorilla Glass 4, glimmend: ja
Opslag
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 116.6 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 audio via USB-C adapter, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: acceleratiesensor, gyroscoop, nabijheidssensor, kompas, vingerafdrukscanner, USB OTG, WiFi Direct, Qualcomm Quick Charge 3, Qi Wireless Charging
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE Cat. 18 (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20), downloads tot max. 1.2 GBit/s, 2x Nano-SIM, hoofd SAR 0.542 W/kg, lichaam SAR 1.593 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 8.1 x 150.9 x 74.9
Batterij
3400 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.0 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix dual camera 12 MP (f/1.8, 1/2.55", 1.4 µm) + 12 MP (f/2.4, 1/2.9", 1.0 µm), 4-axis stabilization, dual-pixel auto-focus, multiframe noise reduction, slow motion 240 FPS
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0; 1.4 µm
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: mono luidspreker aan de onderzijde, Toetsenbord: virtueel, modulaire oplader, USB-kabel (Type A naar Type C), 3.5-mm audio via USB-C adapter, SIM tool, beschermende cover, snelstarthandleiding, MIUI 9.5, 24 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
189 g, Voeding: 45 g
Prijs
799 EUR

 

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
939 MBit/s ∼100% +44%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
669 MBit/s ∼71% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB eMMC Flash
656 MBit/s ∼70% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
654 MBit/s ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
652 MBit/s ∼69% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 939, n=216)
198 MBit/s ∼21% -70%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 MBit/s ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB eMMC Flash
585 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Mali-G72 MP18, 9810, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
519 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Apple iPhone X
A11 Bionic GPU, A11 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
456 MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.8 - 703, n=216)
191 MBit/s ∼29% -71%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: overall route
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: overall route
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: lake
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: lake
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: turning point
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: overall route
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: lake
Garmin Edge 500: turning point
Garmin Edge 500: turning point

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
463
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
444
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 492 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 462.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.35 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 492 cd/m²
Contrast: 834:1 (Zwart: 0.59 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.99
Apple iPhone X
Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2
Sony Xperia XZ2
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Screen
37%
37%
22%
36%
15%
Brightness middle
492
600
22%
569
16%
565
15%
630
28%
472
-4%
Brightness
463
606
31%
578
25%
571
23%
632
37%
430
-7%
Brightness Distribution
90
94
4%
95
6%
96
7%
96
7%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.59
0.44
25%
0.27
54%
Contrast
834
1432
72%
1748
110%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.4
1.2
50%
1.3
46%
2.3
4%
1.5
37%
3.5
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.2
3
52%
2.1
66%
4.8
23%
4.3
31%
5.9
5%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
1.6
64%
1.6
64%
1.9
58%
2.1
53%
4
11%
Gamma
2.25 107%
2.23 108%
2.31 104%
2.16 111%
2.17 111%
2.29 105%
CCT
6395 102%
6707 97%
6401 102%
6332 103%
6513 100%
7048 92%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 1168 Hz ≤ 36 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 1168 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 36 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 1168 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 54 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 10750 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 588200) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
25.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 7.6 ms stijging
↘ 16.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd vergelijkbaar is met het gemiddelde (26.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
56 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 27.6 ms stijging
↘ 28.4 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (41.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
162183 Points ∼72%
Apple iPhone X
197851 Points ∼88% +22%
Huawei P20 Pro
179709 Points ∼80% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
222290 Points ∼99% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ2
225663 Points ∼100% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 230421, n=6)
214821 Points ∼95% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (23540 - 230421, n=314)
70902 Points ∼31% -56%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
266601 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
256297 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P20 Pro
207959 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
250577 Points ∼94% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2
266981 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
204457 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (255739 - 266981, n=7)
263395 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (21088 - 266981, n=84)
112962 Points ∼42% -58%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
8078 Points ∼99%
Huawei P20 Pro
6982 Points ∼85% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5319 Points ∼65% -34%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8069 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
7046 Points ∼86% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7717 - 8601, n=7)
8168 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone (3159 - 8601, n=174)
4524 Points ∼55% -44%
Work performance score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
9179 Points ∼96%
Huawei P20 Pro
8115 Points ∼85% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
5822 Points ∼61% -37%
Sony Xperia XZ2
9319 Points ∼97% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
8169 Points ∼85% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (9179 - 10264, n=6)
9579 Points ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 10264, n=337)
4698 Points ∼49% -49%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
1234 Points ∼73%
Apple iPhone X
1682 Points ∼100% +36%
Huawei P20 Pro
1273 Points ∼76% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
1109 Points ∼66% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2
1346 Points ∼80% +9%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
1264 Points ∼75% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1234 - 1437, n=6)
1361 Points ∼81% +10%
Average of class Smartphone (7 - 1682, n=412)
674 Points ∼40% -45%
Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
7918 Points ∼86%
Apple iPhone X
9248 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei P20 Pro
3725 Points ∼40% -53%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6370 Points ∼69% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2
7868 Points ∼85% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5936 Points ∼64% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7868 - 7957, n=6)
7924 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (18 - 9248, n=412)
1525 Points ∼16% -81%
Memory (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3012 Points ∼74%
Apple iPhone X
1219 Points ∼30% -60%
Huawei P20 Pro
4050 Points ∼100% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2625 Points ∼65% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2193 Points ∼54% -27%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3544 Points ∼88% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2193 - 3799, n=6)
3155 Points ∼78% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (21 - 4423, n=412)
1114 Points ∼28% -63%
System (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
5792 Points ∼56%
Apple iPhone X
10281 Points ∼100% +78%
Huawei P20 Pro
5965 Points ∼58% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6413 Points ∼62% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8402 Points ∼82% +45%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5822 Points ∼57% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5792 - 8435, n=6)
7798 Points ∼76% +35%
Average of class Smartphone (369 - 10281, n=412)
2213 Points ∼22% -62%
Overall (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3614 Points ∼90%
Apple iPhone X
3737 Points ∼93% +3%
Huawei P20 Pro
3271 Points ∼81% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3302 Points ∼82% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3738 Points ∼93% +3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3527 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3614 - 4308, n=6)
4016 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1 - 4308, n=416)
1129 Points ∼28% -69%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sorteer op waarde)
Huawei P20 Pro
8025 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
6202 Points ∼43%
Sony Xperia XZ2
14362 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
7750 Points ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (12493 - 14362, n=3)
13643 Points ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone (773 - 14362, n=111)
3973 Points ∼28%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
8937 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone X
10255 Points ∼100% +15%
Huawei P20 Pro
6756 Points ∼66% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
8963 Points ∼87% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8510 Points ∼83% -5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
6649 Points ∼65% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (8437 - 8937, n=5)
8637 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 10558, n=156)
4089 Points ∼40% -54%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2456 Points ∼58%
Apple iPhone X
4265 Points ∼100% +74%
Huawei P20 Pro
1922 Points ∼45% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3776 Points ∼89% +54%
Sony Xperia XZ2
2464 Points ∼58% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
1943 Points ∼46% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2429 - 2464, n=5)
2449 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (390 - 4265, n=157)
1222 Points ∼29% -50%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2606 Points ∼72%
Apple iPhone X
2361 Points ∼65% -9%
Huawei P20 Pro
2926 Points ∼81% +12%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2469 Points ∼68% -5%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3630 Points ∼100% +39%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
2956 Points ∼81% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2606 - 3669, n=6)
3298 Points ∼91% +27%
Average of class Smartphone (531 - 3669, n=264)
1555 Points ∼43% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
5181 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
3463 Points ∼67% -33%
Huawei P20 Pro
3017 Points ∼58% -42%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3582 Points ∼69% -31%
Sony Xperia XZ2
5122 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
4034 Points ∼78% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3488 - 5212, n=6)
4861 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (53 - 5212, n=264)
1085 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
4248 Points ∼91%
Apple iPhone X
3138 Points ∼67% -26%
Huawei P20 Pro
2996 Points ∼64% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3256 Points ∼69% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2
4693 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3732 Points ∼80% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3419 - 4732, n=6)
4373 Points ∼93% +3%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 4732, n=272)
1034 Points ∼22% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
2159 Points ∼59%
Huawei P20 Pro
2885 Points ∼79% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
2496 Points ∼69% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2
3642 Points ∼100% +69%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
2547 Points ∼70% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2159 - 3642, n=6)
3043 Points ∼84% +41%
Average of class Smartphone (537 - 3642, n=293)
1449 Points ∼40% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
6630 Points ∼82%
Huawei P20 Pro
3335 Points ∼41% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
4637 Points ∼57% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2
8122 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
5599 Points ∼69% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (5637 - 8252, n=6)
7399 Points ∼91% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (54 - 8252, n=293)
1452 Points ∼18% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
4540 Points ∼71%
Huawei P20 Pro
3223 Points ∼51% -29%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3895 Points ∼61% -14%
Sony Xperia XZ2
6378 Points ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
4422 Points ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (4540 - 6378, n=6)
5593 Points ∼88% +23%
Average of class Smartphone (68 - 6378, n=301)
1243 Points ∼19% -73%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
30245 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone X
25633 Points ∼71% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro
22441 Points ∼63% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
26226 Points ∼73% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35856 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
21337 Points ∼60% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (27817 - 36494, n=6)
33069 Points ∼92% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (7733 - 36494, n=446)
12118 Points ∼34% -60%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
76078 Points ∼68%
Apple iPhone X
112489 Points ∼100% +48%
Huawei P20 Pro
33472 Points ∼30% -56%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
46610 Points ∼41% -39%
Sony Xperia XZ2
80233 Points ∼71% +5%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
57134 Points ∼51% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (76078 - 81726, n=6)
79918 Points ∼71% +5%
Average of class Smartphone (2396 - 113380, n=446)
15620 Points ∼14% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
56913 Points ∼89%
Apple iPhone X
64169 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro
30176 Points ∼47% -47%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
39745 Points ∼62% -30%
Sony Xperia XZ2
62926 Points ∼98% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
41618 Points ∼65% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (56669 - 63084, n=6)
60664 Points ∼95% +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2841 - 64405, n=447)
13464 Points ∼21% -76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
150 fps ∼85%
Apple iPhone X
177.4 fps ∼100% +18%
Huawei P20 Pro
121 fps ∼68% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
147 fps ∼83% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2
150 fps ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
102 fps ∼57% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (98 - 151, n=6)
141 fps ∼79% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (4.2 - 177, n=473)
27 fps ∼15% -82%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
59.4 fps ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (59 - 60, n=5)
59.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (7.5 - 120, n=476)
23.4 fps ∼39% -61%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
74 fps ∼84%
Apple iPhone X
88.2 fps ∼100% +19%
Huawei P20 Pro
61 fps ∼69% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
74 fps ∼84% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2
82 fps ∼93% +11%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
49 fps ∼56% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (66 - 82, n=5)
73.8 fps ∼84% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1.6 - 88.2, n=398)
14.4 fps ∼16% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
59 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
58.5 fps ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
54 fps ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia XZ2
59 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
45 fps ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 59, n=5)
54 fps ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4.4 - 115, n=400)
14.5 fps ∼25% -75%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
48.9 fps ∼82% -18%
Huawei P20 Pro
39 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
47 fps ∼78% -22%
Sony Xperia XZ2
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
34 fps ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (39 - 60.9, n=6)
56 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 60, n=263)
12.7 fps ∼21% -79%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
55 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone X
44.1 fps ∼80% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro
36 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
24 fps ∼44% -56%
Sony Xperia XZ2
55 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
34 fps ∼62% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (31 - 55, n=5)
50 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (3.3 - 110, n=265)
12.7 fps ∼23% -77%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
35 fps ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
23 fps ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
28 fps ∼80% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
24 fps ∼69% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (35 - 35, n=5)
35 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.9 - 35, n=195)
8.8 fps ∼25% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sorteer op waarde)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
34 fps ∼100%
Huawei P20 Pro
22 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
14 fps ∼41% -59%
Sony Xperia XZ2
33 fps ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
23 fps ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (20 - 34, n=5)
30.4 fps ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1.4 - 50, n=198)
7.91 fps ∼23% -77%

Legende

 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Apple iPhone X Apple A11 Bionic, Apple A11 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P20 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 970, ARM Mali-G72 MP12, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Samsung Exynos 9810, ARM Mali-G72 MP18, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Sony Xperia XZ2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1)
224 Points ∼100% +221%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
89.54 Points ∼40% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (69.8 - 89.5, n=7)
85.2 Points ∼38% +22%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
69.765 Points ∼31%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
69.59 Points ∼31% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
58.255 Points ∼26% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 224, n=331)
34.6 Points ∼15% -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
35255 Points ∼100% +143%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
16774 Points ∼48% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (14491 - 17131, n=7)
16340 Points ∼46% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
14760 Points ∼42% +2%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
14491 Points ∼41%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼33% -20%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
10122 Points ∼29% -30%
Average of class Smartphone (1506 - 35255, n=467)
5018 Points ∼14% -65%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (718 - 59466, n=486)
11866 ms * ∼100% -314%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼32% -34%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
2868 ms * ∼24%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
2712.9 ms * ∼23% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2394 - 2868, n=7)
2492 ms * ∼21% +13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
2394.3 ms * ∼20% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
2059.7 ms * ∼17% +28%
Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2)
718 ms * ∼6% +75%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0)
354 Points ∼100% +55%
Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65)
262 Points ∼74% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (228 - 291, n=7)
255 Points ∼72% +12%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S (Chrome 66.0.3359.158)
228 Points ∼64%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
182 Points ∼51% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0)
164 Points ∼46% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 362, n=232)
98.1 Points ∼28% -57%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 (Chrome 53)
57 Points ∼16% -75%

* ... kleiner is beter

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2SHuawei P20 ProSamsung Galaxy S9 PlusSony Xperia XZ2Xiaomi Mi Mix 2Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
9%
-20%
-23%
-21%
-2%
-76%
Random Write 4KB
128.36
160.49
25%
22.74
-82%
17
-87%
15.75
-88%
114 (20 - 164, n=10)
-11%
13.2 (0.14 - 164, n=519)
-90%
Random Read 4KB
135.14
144.33
7%
129.68
-4%
149.4
11%
148.54
10%
140 (132 - 147, n=10)
4%
33.7 (1.59 - 173, n=519)
-75%
Sequential Write 256KB
208.1
196.69
-5%
204.94
-2%
198.7
-5%
208.62
0%
202 (192 - 212, n=10)
-3%
69.1 (2.99 - 216, n=519)
-67%
Sequential Read 256KB
756.07
831.82
10%
818.69
8%
679.2
-10%
703.99
-7%
768 (699 - 832, n=10)
2%
208 (12.1 - 832, n=519)
-72%
Max. Belasting
 39.2 °C39.5 °C40.3 °C 
 38.7 °C39.2 °C40.3 °C 
 38.5 °C38.2 °C40.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Gemiddelde: 39.4 °C
33.7 °C34.7 °C36.3 °C
34 °C35.3 °C36.9 °C
34.6 °C35.1 °C36.6 °C
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Gemiddelde: 35.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  34.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.240.72532.9433137.238.14031.736.55039.632.16328.333.58027.332.410026.929.612526.731.8160243820020.945.925020.952.931519.555.440018.559.650017.562.763017.568.680015.769.9100015.870.8125016.673.9160015.871.7200015.472.2250015.571.431501671.4400015.873.450001672.3630016.369.2800016.368.21000016.263.81250016.453.51600016.453.5SPL28.683.1N1.155.1median 16.4Xiaomi Mi Mix 2Smedian 68.2Delta2.19.827.727.427.727.726.427.725.430.125.430.529.930.530.924.330.923.825.723.82223.42222.923.522.927.727.427.727.221.327.24020.44048.42248.454.220.554.256.620.256.66220.76265.616.765.666.817.966.87018.47072.117.572.173.717.173.774.91574.977.115.377.178.114.578.179.514.179.575.513.975.570.713.870.768.613.968.666.213.966.261.613.861.646.713.746.786.628.686.661.71.161.7median 66.2Xiaomi Mi Mix 2median 17.1median 66.212.13.312.135.240.532.942.437.233.831.73039.635.128.33127.327.326.930.626.738.62446.820.951.720.955.319.554.218.556.917.561.817.565.315.769.315.872.516.675.215.869.415.471.915.573.91675.315.876.81674.516.370.616.371.316.267.216.459.716.44928.684.91.160.3median 16.4Huawei P20 Promedian 67.22.19.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei P20 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.18 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 0.75 / 2.25 / 2.26 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.89 / 9.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3771 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
2%
35%
34%
3%
14%
7%
17%
Idle Minimum *
0.75
1.03
-37%
0.84
-12%
0.68
9%
0.72
4%
0.69
8%
0.737 (0.42 - 1.16, n=6)
2%
0.854 (0.2 - 3.4, n=549)
-14%
Idle Average *
2.25
2.4
-7%
1.54
32%
0.95
58%
2.21
2%
2.03
10%
1.86 (1 - 2.25, n=6)
17%
1.69 (0.6 - 6.2, n=548)
25%
Idle Maximum *
2.26
2.6
-15%
1.57
31%
1.09
52%
2.22
2%
2.1
7%
1.988 (1.57 - 2.26, n=6)
12%
1.922 (0.74 - 6.6, n=549)
15%
Load Average *
4.89
2.96
39%
2.47
49%
4.58
6%
4.6
6%
3.18
35%
4.92 (4.3 - 6.25, n=6)
-1%
3.96 (0.8 - 10.8, n=543)
19%
Load Maximum *
9.6
6.6
31%
2.49
74%
5.16
46%
9.34
3%
8.73
9%
9.17 (8.3 - 10.2, n=6)
4%
5.57 (1.2 - 14.2, n=543)
42%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
27h 58min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 58min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 59min
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
3400 mAh
Apple iPhone X
2716 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
3500 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2
3180 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
3771 mAh
Batterijduur
-20%
15%
-14%
-13%
-16%
Reader / Idle
1678
1292
-23%
1727
3%
1343
-20%
1402
-16%
H.264
718
634
-12%
784
9%
674
-6%
722
1%
WiFi v1.3
716
564
-21%
744
4%
521
-27%
679
-5%
600
-16%
Load
239
180
-25%
345
44%
237
-1%
159
-33%

Pro

+ erg snelle SoC
+ hoge kwaliteit behuizing
+ dual-SIM
+ USB-C
+ Android 8.0 met intuïtieve MIUI 9.5 gebruikersinterface
+ helder beeldscherm
+ erg goede dual cameras
+ niet veel warmteontwikkeling
+ goede batterijduur
+ beschermende cover meegeleverd

Contra

- USB-C enkel op 2.0 speeds
- geen IP certificering
- geen microSD-slot
- 3.5-mm headset enkel via USB-C adapter
In review: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzen Shop.
In review: Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S. Test unit provided by Trading Shenzen Shop.

Dit is de verkorte versie van het originele artikel. Het volledige, Engelse testrapport vind je hier.

Net als de Xiaomi Mi Mix 2, heeft de Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S geen noemenswaardige minpunten. Het vakmanschap van de 5.99-inch Android smartphone is eersteklas, het beeldscherm toont een messcherpe weergave van de content, de dual camera opstelling behoort tot de beste van dit moment en de communicatie modules laten ook bijna niets te wensen over. Met de Snapdragon 845 is er een bliksemsnelle SoC, waardoor het bedienen van de Mi Mix 2S wonderbaarlijk vloeiend is. De gebruikte Android 8.0, uitgebreid met MIUI 9.5, is iets anders qua layout dan stock Android, maar navigeren gaat net zo makkelijk en gebruiksvriendelijk, plus dat je een paar praktisch extra's krijgt.

Er zijn slechts een paar minpunten te benoemen met het huidige Xiaomi vlaggenschip: de USB-C poort kan enkel USB 2.0 snelheden aan en er is geen microSD-slot. Je kunt het ontbreken van 3.5-mm poort oplossen door de meegeleverde USB adapter te gebruiken. In tegenstellingen tot veel van zijn high-end rivalen heeft de Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S geen IP certificering, en is er dus geen stof- en spatwaterbestendigheid. Diegenen die de Xiaomi importeren uit China, zoals wij, moeten zelf Google Play installeren, al gaat dit makkelijk en snel en is het geen echt nadeel.

Een succesvolle poging: met de krachtige algehele prestaties is de Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S een goed alternatief voor high-end smartphones zoals de Apple iPhone X, Huawei P20 Pro of Samsung Galaxy S9+.

Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S - 22-05-2018 v6
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing
86%
Toetsenbord
69 / 75 → 92%
Aanwijsapparaat
92%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
47 / 60 → 78%
Gewicht
89%
Batterij
94%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
68 / 63 → 100%
Applicatie-performance
73 / 70 → 100%
Temperatuur
86%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
77 / 91 → 85%
Camera
84%
Gemiddelde
81%
88%
Smartphone - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S Smartphone
Manuel Masiero, 2018-06- 3 (Update: 2018-06- 3)