Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CQ7Z) Laptop: Een gaming laptop met dunne beeldschermranden

Een Clevo alternatief. Als het gaat om configureerbare high-end laptops, is fabrikant Clevo al lange tijd een bekende speler in de industrie. Tongfang is al een tijdje zijn concurrent, dus we hebben het GK5CQ7Z-model nog een keer getest. Lees verder om erachter te komen hoe de XMG Neo 15 met zijn 9e generatie Intel-processor en RTX 20-serie GPU presteert in onze tests.
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser, Felicitas Krohn,
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 (XMG Neo 15 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H
Grafische kaart
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 885 MHz, Geheugen: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 441.12, Optimus
Geheugen
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dual-channel. Alle slots bezet, maximum van 64 GB
Beeldscherm
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, glimmend: nee
Moederbord
Intel HM370
Opslag
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, twee M.2-2280 drive slots
Geluidskaart
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Verbindingen: Aparte koptelefoon en microfoon slots, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Netwerkmogelijkheden
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 22 x 359 x 243
Batterij
62 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: 2.0, Toetsenbord: RGB, mechanisch, Toetsenbordverlichting: ja, 230 Watt stroomadapter, Control Center, 24 Maanden Garantie
Gewicht
2.056 kg, Voeding: 690 g
Prijs
2268 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
83 %
12-2019
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg22 mm15.6"1920x1080
84 %
08-2019
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
84 %
05-2019
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg19 mm15.6"1920x1080
82 %
09-2019
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.4 kg19.8 mm15.6"1920x1080
85 %
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg25 mm15.6"1920x1080

Size Comparison

362 mm 265 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg362.2 mm 261.6 mm 19.8 mm 2.4 kg359 mm 243 mm 22 mm 2.1 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 212, n=278)
92.8 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78 MB/s ∼84%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=276)
110 MB/s ∼100% +29%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼77%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1360 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=317)
676 MBit/s ∼50% -50%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
1140 MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=317)
628 MBit/s ∼55% -45%
307
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 313 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 294.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 89 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 313 cd/m²
Contrast: 1043:1 (Zwart: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.33 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9, calibrated: 1.77
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
90% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.51
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NV156FHM-N4G (BOE084D), IPS, 1920x1080
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NV156FHM-N4K (BOE082A), IPS, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 1920x1080
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
AU Optronics AUO82ED, IPS, 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
BOE NV156FHM-N4J, IPS, 1920x1080
Response Times
27%
-26%
-24%
-41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
9.6 (4.8, 4.8)
5.2 (2.6, 2.6)
46%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-58%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
-58%
19 (9, 10)
-98%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
7%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
7%
10.8 (6, 4.8)
10%
10 (6, 4)
17%
PWM Frequency
23580 (24)
Screen
4%
1%
-18%
19%
Brightness middle
313
288
-8%
266
-15%
324.8
4%
477
52%
Brightness
295
265
-10%
248
-16%
316
7%
431
46%
Brightness Distribution
89
84
-6%
89
0%
84
-6%
84
-6%
Black Level *
0.3
0.22
27%
0.31
-3%
0.26
13%
0.175
42%
Contrast
1043
1309
26%
858
-18%
1249
20%
2726
161%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.33
3.22
3%
2.78
17%
4.96
-49%
4.17
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.25
6.26
-0%
5.96
5%
8.95
-43%
6.97
-12%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.77
1.5
15%
0.91
49%
3.23
-82%
2.51
-42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.1
3.43
-11%
3.58
-15%
5
-61%
3.49
-13%
Gamma
2.51 88%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.21 100%
2.5 88%
CCT
6930 94%
7290 89%
7186 90%
7742 84%
7076 92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
60
2%
62
5%
59.8
1%
60
2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
90
93
3%
96
7%
91.8
2%
91
1%
Totaal Gemiddelde (Programma / Instellingen)
16% / 7%
-13% / -3%
-21% / -19%
-11% / 10%

* ... kleiner is beter

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
12 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6.8 ms stijging
↘ 5.2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
9.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 4.8 ms stijging
↘ 4.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou geschikt moeten zijn voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (39.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM niet waargenomen

Ter vergelijking: 50 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 18082 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1002 (974.71-1181)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1066 (1053.71-1188.07)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1007 (976.09-1115.02)
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø968 (959.49-1081.9)
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1132 (1125.75-1244.28)
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
457 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
448 Points ∼98% +3%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
442 Points ∼97% +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (340 - 511, n=95)
441 Points ∼96% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
434 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
429 Points ∼94% -1%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (1530 - 6321, n=96)
2843 Points ∼100% +19%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
2694 Points ∼95% +13%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
2448 Points ∼86% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
2427 Points ∼85% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
2384 Points ∼84%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
2298 Points ∼81% -4%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
189 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
183 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
181 Points ∼94% -6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=575)
159 Points ∼83% -17%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼100% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
Intel Core i7-9750H
1188 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Intel Core i7-9750H
1181 Points ∼99%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H
1115 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
Intel Core i7-9750H
1057 Points ∼89% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=579)
886 Points ∼75% -25%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
192 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1181 Points
Help
PCMark 10 - Score
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
5991 Points ∼100% +8%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
5938 Points ∼99% +8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
5746 Points ∼96% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼95% +3%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
5522 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=267)
5303 Points ∼89% -4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-128G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
22%
22%
27%
-32%
Write 4K
108.7
108.8
0%
115.5
6%
137.4
26%
134.2
23%
Read 4K
41.4
40.31
-3%
57.97
40%
41.37
0%
37.72
-9%
Write Seq
1083
2488
130%
1555
44%
2500
131%
389.2
-64%
Read Seq
917.2
1916
109%
2590
182%
1576
72%
1030
12%
Write 4K Q32T1
468.5
382.4
-18%
369.3
-21%
446.7
-5%
238.9
-49%
Read 4K Q32T1
529.6
421.8
-20%
441.7
-17%
522.4
-1%
343.9
-35%
Write Seq Q32T1
3057
2542
-17%
1547
-49%
2796
-9%
789.1
-74%
Read Seq Q32T1
3422
3320
-3%
2969
-13%
3415
0%
1501.9
-56%
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3422 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3057 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 529.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 468.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 917.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1083 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 108.7 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
18275 punten
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34619 punten
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15226 punten
3DMark Time Spy Score
6358 punten
Help
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30001: Ø60.8 (55-68)
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3921 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3738 Points ∼95%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3721 Points ∼95% 0%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3719 Points ∼95% -1%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3717 Points ∼95% -1%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6831 Points ∼100% +7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6748 Points ∼99% +6%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6716 Points ∼98% +5%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6419 Points ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6387 Points ∼94%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18060 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17419 Points ∼96%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17335 Points ∼96% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16968 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
16483 Points ∼91% -5%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22749 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22005 Points ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21959 Points ∼97% 0%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
21861 Points ∼96%
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18434 Points ∼81% -16%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
72.6 (min: 59) fps ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
60.4 (min: 49) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=367)
51.9 fps ∼71% -14%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
100.8 (min: 78) fps ∼100% +21%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
83.2 (min: 65) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (29.8 - 136, n=19)
78.1 fps ∼77% -6%
GRID 2019 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
79.4 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +22%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
65.1 (min: 54) fps ∼82%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.9 - 107, n=23)
61.5 fps ∼77% -6%
Ghost Recon Breakpoint - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
66 (min: 31) fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
57 (min: 30) fps ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (4 - 83, n=22)
50.4 fps ∼76% -12%
FIFA 20 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
210 (min: 164) fps ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
195 (min: 149) fps ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (58.3 - 264, n=22)
172 fps ∼82% -12%
Borderlands 3 - 1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
63.3 fps ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
53 fps ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.3 - 89.4, n=39)
48.4 fps ∼76% -9%
Control - 1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
71.2 (min: 63) fps ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
59.3 (min: 52) fps ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.2 - 92.1, n=31)
51.2 fps ∼72% -14%
Apex Legends - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:TS AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
143 (min: 139) fps ∼100% +16%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
123 (min: 114) fps ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.5 - 163, n=30)
105 fps ∼73% -15%
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Overboost)
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
98.1 (min: 90) fps ∼100% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-9750H
83.2 (min: 76) fps ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (28.2 - 124, n=31)
78.8 fps ∼80% -5%
lage gem. hoge ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 113 60.4 fps
Apex Legends (2019) 124 123 fps
Rage 2 (2019) 85.5 83.2 fps
F1 2019 (2019) 147 105 fps
Control (2019) 59.3 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 69.3 53 fps
FIFA 20 (2019) 203 195 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 78 57 fps
GRID 2019 (2019) 107 65.1 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 96.9 83.2 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 91.8 84.4 fps
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.839.637.235.732.937.7254445.244.644.842.346.83133.337.736.43534.235.24031.336.736.533.434.234.45039.839.440.83937.533.46334.234.133.430.632.331.88032.533.932.433.930.848.810029.932.232.732.131.433.612530.93331.930.129.232.316034.435.936.735.134.333.520035.628.728.92826.630.825032.627.831.227.726.232.431532.126.927.924.822.834.340030.925.826.121.219.836.150031.92625.420.519.437.36303225.423.620.721.636.280033.725.221.818.417.338.6100034.726.222.718.417.240.6125035.726.623.618.918.841.5160037.828.922.818.318.143.9200038.726.521.61816.844.625003724.120.418.41743.5315035.32319.417.816.944400035.822.419.117.716.744.1500032.120.21817.717.240.9630029.618.517.817.516.939.5800025.21817.717.816.935.21000022.91817.817.71733.41250019.71817.717.518.428.21600018.517.717.717.516.922.6SPL473734.531.730.953.9N5.72.82.31.71.69.3median 32.1median 25.8median 22.7median 18.4median 18.1median 36.2Delta2.72.84.93.343.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSchenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19

Geluidsniveau

Onbelast
31 / 34 / 37 dB (A)
Belasting
47 / 54 dB (A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
stil
40 dB(A)
hoorbaar
50 dB(A)
luid
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm afstand)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
2%
-1%
7%
9%
6%
off / environment *
31
30
3%
30
3%
29
6%
30
3%
29.4 (27.7 - 32, n=368)
5%
Idle Minimum *
31
30
3%
31
-0%
30.5
2%
31.3
-1%
31.4 (28 - 42, n=791)
-1%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
31.5
7%
31.3
8%
32.6 (28 - 46.6, n=791)
4%
Idle Maximum *
37
39
-5%
39
-5%
31.5
15%
31.3
15%
34.7 (28 - 52, n=791)
6%
Load Average *
47
45
4%
46
2%
40.6
14%
42
11%
40.9 (28 - 59, n=792)
13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
49
2%
53
-6%
49.5
1%
42.1
16%
Load Maximum *
54
51
6%
55
-2%
53.4
1%
46.5
14%
48.3 (38.9 - 64.1, n=792)
11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Max. Belasting
 58 °C60 °C49 °C 
 42 °C47 °C41 °C 
 36 °C40 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 60 °C
Gemiddelde: 45.9 °C
66 °C66 °C56 °C
65 °C65 °C45 °C
37 °C37 °C32 °C
Maximum: 66 °C
Gemiddelde: 52.1 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  47 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 60 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 39.7 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 42.5 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-14.2 °C / -25.6 F).
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
11%
2%
-11%
-1%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
60
49
18%
58
3%
48.8
19%
43.9
27%
45.9 (28 - 68.8, n=757)
23%
Maximum Bottom *
66
59
11%
64
3%
55
17%
47.6
28%
49.7 (25.9 - 78, n=755)
25%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28
7%
30
-0%
41
-37%
38.6
-29%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=709)
-2%
Idle Bottom *
32
29
9%
31
3%
45.6
-43%
40.8
-28%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=707)
1%

* ... kleiner is beter

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.9342542.338.93134.2324034.2365037.539.76332.334.28030.832.610031.429.512529.231.816034.33320026.632.425026.246.331522.856.640019.862.450019.460.263021.665.980017.376.1100017.273.6125018.866.4160018.165.7200016.866.425001765.3315016.968.2400016.766.5500017.267.5630016.971.5800016.968.4100001767.41250018.464.51600016.959.5SPL30.981.1N1.650median 18.1median 65.7Delta48.431.734.233.7373032.936.637.134.23527.634.32833.424.63823.847.123.952.821.550.722.160.321.664.420.56719.5621868.217.970.518.369.720.869.618.769.717.469.917.769.317.668.517.267.417.464.117.363.217.364.417.162.217.258.517.254.430.5801.448.9median 18median 64.41.76.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSchenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.9 / 2.4 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 11 / 15 / 21 Watt
Belasting midlight 94 / 173 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
10%
-38%
-144%
-38%
-39%
Idle Minimum *
11
7
36%
21
-91%
46
-318%
22.2
-102%
19.1 (1.9 - 113, n=753)
-74%
Idle Average *
15
12
20%
23
-53%
59
-293%
24.9
-66%
24.6 (6.6 - 119, n=753)
-64%
Idle Maximum *
21
22
-5%
32
-52%
65.5
-212%
30.6
-46%
30.1 (8.3 - 122, n=753)
-43%
Load Average *
94
86
9%
97
-3%
99.8
-6%
101
-7%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=744)
-11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
143
144
-1%
148
-3%
154.1
-8%
143
-0%
Load Maximum *
173
177
-2%
213
-23%
222.7
-29%
186
-8%
174 (21.9 - 590, n=743)
-1%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
7h 19min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
5h 40min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
1h 19min
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 62 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-51-71PZ
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q,  Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
HP Omen X 2S 15-dg0075cl
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 72 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 57 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Batterijduur
38%
59%
-37%
-47%
-14%
Reader / Idle
439
666
52%
545
24%
221
-50%
355 (39 - 1174, n=703)
-19%
WiFi v1.3
340
478
41%
421
24%
129
-62%
179
-47%
263 (62 - 622, n=415)
-23%
Load
79
96
22%
181
129%
80
1%
79.4 (18 - 202, n=671)
1%
H.264
408
259 (88 - 508, n=154)

Pro

+ compact
+ lichtgewicht
+ robuust
+ mechanisch toetsenbord
+ RGB-achtergrondverlichting
+ 144 Hz paneel
+ dunne beeldschermranden
+ individueel configureerbaar

Contra

- hoge oppervlaktetemperaturen
- luide ventilatoren onder langdurige belasting
- geen Thunderbolt 3
- teleurstellende luidsprekers

Samenvatting - Een laptop die bijna elke gamer zou moeten aanspreken

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 laptop. Testmodel geleverd door bestware.com
Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 laptop. Testmodel geleverd door bestware.com

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

Over het algemeen is de Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 een goede gaming-laptop, afgezien van de hoge oppervlaktetemperaturen en luide ventilatoren tijdens het gamen. Ons testmodel biedt uitgebalanceerde maar krachtige hardware die de meeste gamers zou moeten aanspreken.

Door de combinatie van de Core i7-9750H en RTX 2070 Max-Q kan het apparaat alle moderne games soepel spelen op het 144 Hz-display. Evenzo zijn de compacte metalen behuizing van de Neo 15 en het mechanische toetsenbord met RGB-achtergrondverlichting verdere redenen om dit model aan te bevelen. De mogelijkheid om het apparaat individueel te configureren is ook een bonus.

 

Het zou leuk geweest zijn als Schenker een Thunderbolt 3-poort en betere luidsprekers had opgenomen. Dit mogen echter geen redenen zijn om de XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 af te wijzen, omdat deze op andere gebieden uitblinkt.

Schenker XMG Neo 15 XNE15M19 - 14-05-2020 v7
Florian Glaser

Behuizing
82 / 98 → 84%
Toetsenbord
89%
Aanwijsapparaat
81%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
61 / 80 → 77%
Gewicht
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Batterij
67 / 95 → 71%
Beeldscherm
86%
Gaming-performance
89%
Applicatie-performance
91%
Temperatuur
68 / 95 → 72%
Luidheid
65 / 90 → 72%
Audio
74%
Camera
43 / 85 → 50%
Gemiddelde
74%
83%
Gaming - Gewogen Gemiddelde
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Schenker XMG Neo 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Schenker XMG Neo 15 (Tongfang GK5CQ7Z) Laptop: Een gaming laptop met dunne beeldschermranden
Florian Glaser, 2019-12- 8 (Update: 2019-12- 8)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj