Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Tablet - Ongetwijfeld de beste 11-inch Android-tablet

Zelfs beter dan de Galaxy Tab S7 Plus! In vergelijking met zijn grotere broer Galaxy Tab S7 +, ziet de Galaxy Tab S7 eruit als een tweederangs tablet. In werkelijkheid is de Galaxy Tab S7 eigenlijk een erg indrukwekkende tablet en beter dan zijn grotere broer. Lees dit korte testrapport om erachter te komen waarom.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (vertaald door Notebookcheck),
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Galaxy Tab S Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) 8 x 2.4 - 3.1 GHz, Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Grafische kaart
Geheugen
6144 MB 
Beeldscherm
11 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 274 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, native pen support, LTPS, glimmend: ja, 120 Hz
Opslag
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 103 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C , Card Reader: microSD tot 1 TB, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: bewegingssensor, e-kompas, gyroscoop, hall-effectsensor, OTG, Miracast
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz; UMTS: B1 (2.100), B2 (1.900), B4, B5 (850), B8 (900), LTE: B1 (2.100), B2 (1.900), B3 (1.800), B4, B5 (850), B7 (2.600), B8 (900), B12 (700), B13 (700), B20 (800), B25 (1.900), B26 (850), B28 (700), B66, LTE, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 6.3 x 253.8 x 165.3
Batterij
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Besturingssysteem
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix + 5 MPix (Ultra wide-angle), Camera2API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: quad-speaker setup afgestemd door AKG, Dolby Atmos, Toetsenbord: digitaal, optioneel Keyboard-Cover, modulaire lader, USB kabel, S Pen, OneUI 2.5, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR body : 1.381 W/Kg, Widevine L1, fanless
Gewicht
500 g, Voeding: 51 g
Prijs
681 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Evaluatie
Datum
Model
Gewicht
Hoogte
Formaat
Resolutie
Best Price
90 %
10-2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
500 g6.3 mm11"2560x1600
90 %
04-2020
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic, A12Z Bionic GPU
471 g5.9 mm11"2388x1668
88 %
08-2020
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
460 g7.2 mm10.8"2560x1600
88 %
10-2020
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
SD 865+ (Plus), Adreno 650
575 g5.7 mm12.4"2800x1752
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Kort testrapport van de Samsung Galaxy Tab S7

Size Comparison

285 mm 185 mm 5.7 mm 575 g253.8 mm 165.3 mm 6.3 mm 500 g247.6 mm 178.5 mm 5.9 mm 471 g246 mm 159 mm 7.2 mm 460 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1065 (1022min - 1104max) MBit/s ∼100% +27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
836 (624min - 890max) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
629 (284min - 753max) MBit/s ∼59% -25%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
609 (572min - 622max) MBit/s ∼57% -27%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
873 (750min - 946max) MBit/s ∼100% +29%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
A12Z Bionic GPU, A12Z Bionic, 128 GB NVMe
828 (752min - 864max) MBit/s ∼95% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
679 (653min - 709max) MBit/s ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Adreno 650, SD 865+ (Plus), 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
612 (243min - 690max) MBit/s ∼70% -10%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (624-890)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø679 (653-709)
Navigatie: Garmin Edge 500
Navigatie: Garmin Edge 500
Navigatie: Garmin Edge 500
Navigatie: Garmin Edge 500
Navigatie: Garmin Edge 500
Navigatie: Garmin Edge 500
Navigatie: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigatie: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigatie: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigatie: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigatie: Galaxy Tab S7
Navigatie: Galaxy Tab S7

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Wide-angle lensWide-angle lens5X zoomLow-light photographyUltra wide-angle lens
klik om beelden te laden
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S7: 47.14 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 93.69 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
0 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Tab S7: 8.16 ∆E min: 0 - max: 17.55 ∆E
548
cd/m²
519
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
535
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 569 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 534.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.44 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 554 cd/m²
Contrast: 1679:1 (Zwart: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6
97% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
LTPS, 2560x1600, 11
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
IPS, 2388x1668, 11
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4
Screen
18%
-20%
-14%
Brightness middle
554
617
11%
606
9%
441
-20%
Brightness
535
585
9%
579
8%
447
-16%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
89
-2%
98
8%
Black Level *
0.33
0.36
-9%
0.32
3%
Contrast
1679
1714
2%
1894
13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.1
0.94
55%
2.9
-38%
2.4
-14%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.1
1.87
74%
6
15%
4.1
42%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.4
12%
4.3
-169%
2.9
-81%
Gamma
2.32 95%
2.156 102%
2.22 99%
2.01 109%
CCT
6623 98%
6733 97%
7272 89%
6469 100%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 59520 Hz ≤ 21 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 59520 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 21 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 59520 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 17482 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
20.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 6.8 ms stijging
↘ 14 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde prima responstijden in onze tests maar is misschien wat te traag voor competitieve games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (24.4 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
45.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 22 ms stijging
↘ 23.6 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
OpenCL Score 5.2
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3591 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3466 - 3591, n=4)
3542 Points ∼2% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3466 Points ∼2% -3%
Average of class Tablet (529 - 3591, n=6)
1824 Points ∼1% -49%
Vulkan Score 5.2
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3732 Points ∼2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3473 - 3955, n=4)
3676 Points ∼2% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3473 Points ∼2% -7%
Average of class Tablet (79 - 3732, n=8)
1357 Points ∼1% -64%
OpenCL Score 5.1
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3756 Points ∼3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
2932 Points ∼2%
Average of class Tablet (138 - 5353, n=5)
2292 Points ∼2%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
4707 Points ∼38% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
3338 Points ∼27% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3201 Points ∼26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3012 - 3300, n=4)
3144 Points ∼25% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3063 Points ∼25% -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
2893 Points ∼23% -10%
Average of class Tablet (498 - 4712, n=21)
1979 Points ∼16% -38%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
1127 Points ∼70% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (950 - 1006, n=4)
976 Points ∼60% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
963 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
950 Points ∼59% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
906 Points ∼56% -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
759 Points ∼47% -21%
Average of class Tablet (135 - 1127, n=21)
590 Points ∼36% -39%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9443 Points ∼22% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9279 Points ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
9279 Points ∼21% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8892 Points ∼20% -4%
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=45)
5745 Points ∼13% -38%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
13186 Points ∼23% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
13066 Points ∼23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
13066 Points ∼23% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
11885 Points ∼21% -9%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=62)
4764 Points ∼8% -64%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4493 Points ∼67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus)
4493 Points ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4261 Points ∼63% -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3865 Points ∼58% -14%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=62)
1670 Points ∼25% -63%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (12457 - 13999, n=4)
12881 Points ∼84% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
12603 Points ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
12466 Points ∼81% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
10952 Points ∼72% -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8636 Points ∼56% -31%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=60)
4914 Points ∼32% -61%
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (13629 - 19824, n=4)
15760 Points ∼79% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
14982 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
13629 Points ∼68% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
13142 Points ∼66% -12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
10918 Points ∼55% -27%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=96)
5329 Points ∼27% -64%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
3830 Points ∼94% +17%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
3658 Points ∼90% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (3100 - 3875, n=4)
3412 Points ∼84% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
3285 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
3100 Points ∼76% -6%
Average of class Tablet (1152 - 3658, n=20)
2346 Points ∼58% -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8768 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8745 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (7613 - 9047, n=4)
8543 Points ∼94% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8173 Points ∼90% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4156 Points ∼46% -53%
Average of class Tablet (400 - 8768, n=20)
2120 Points ∼23% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
6578 Points ∼94% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5960 - 6977, n=4)
6364 Points ∼91% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
6292 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
6226 Points ∼89% -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4036 Points ∼58% -36%
Average of class Tablet (469 - 6292, n=20)
1904 Points ∼27% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
5277 Points ∼66% +23%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4756 Points ∼60% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4159 - 5406, n=4)
4600 Points ∼58% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4298 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4159 Points ∼52% -3%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=61)
1950 Points ∼24% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9893 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (9453 - 10043, n=4)
9836 Points ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
9453 Points ∼94% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9356 Points ∼93% -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4356 Points ∼43% -56%
Average of class Tablet (99 - 9893, n=61)
2021 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7986 Points ∼95% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (7369 - 8386, n=4)
7841 Points ∼94% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
7701 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
7369 Points ∼88% -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4467 Points ∼53% -42%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 7701, n=61)
1787 Points ∼21% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4702 Points ∼82% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4178 - 5361, n=5)
4628 Points ∼80% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4319 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4283 Points ∼74% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4178 Points ∼72% -3%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=67)
1823 Points ∼32% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
13779 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
13149 Points ∼46% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11617 - 13779, n=5)
12716 Points ∼44% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
12694 Points ∼44% -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4405 Points ∼15% -68%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=67)
3186 Points ∼11% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9283 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8709 - 10059, n=5)
9132 Points ∼68% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8902 Points ∼66% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8823 Points ∼66% -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4472 Points ∼33% -52%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=67)
2237 Points ∼17% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4895 Points ∼94% +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4041 - 5035, n=4)
4386 Points ∼84% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4201 Points ∼81%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4096 Points ∼79% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4041 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4201, n=77)
1832 Points ∼35% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8894 Points ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8548 - 9032, n=4)
8871 Points ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8548 Points ∼93% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
8299 Points ∼91% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4425 Points ∼48% -50%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 8894, n=77)
1603 Points ∼17% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (6850 - 7678, n=4)
7213 Points ∼35% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7157 Points ∼35% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
7098 Points ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
6850 Points ∼34% -3%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4334 Points ∼21% -39%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 7098, n=79)
1481 Points ∼7% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
4729 Points ∼90% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
4482 Points ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (4104 - 4911, n=5)
4447 Points ∼84% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
4104 Points ∼78% -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4056 Points ∼77% -10%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4482, n=80)
1716 Points ∼33% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
14283 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
12725 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
12394 Points ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11107 - 14283, n=5)
12371 Points ∼87% -13%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4256 Points ∼30% -70%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 14283, n=80)
2291 Points ∼16% -84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
9238 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
9123 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8272 - 9361, n=5)
8764 Points ∼91% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8675 Points ∼90% -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4215 Points ∼44% -54%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 9238, n=81)
1838 Points ∼19% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
51436 Points ∼60% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (42810 - 56928, n=4)
49274 Points ∼57% +15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
42810 Points ∼50%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
40279 Points ∼47% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
32384 Points ∼37% -24%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
19565 Points ∼23% -54%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51436, n=174)
14462 Points ∼17% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
221941 Points ∼41% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
164853 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
160665 Points ∼29% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (128372 - 169103, n=4)
155748 Points ∼29% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
150281 Points ∼28% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64715 Points ∼12% -61%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=174)
25191 Points ∼5% -85%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
110846 Points ∼45% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
109154 Points ∼44% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (91762 - 117606, n=4)
104977 Points ∼43% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
101385 Points ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
82937 Points ∼34% -18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
42861 Points ∼17% -58%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=175)
18873 Points ∼8% -81%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
225 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
215 fps ∼2% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (171 - 225, n=4)
208 fps ∼2% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
203 fps ∼2% -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
135 fps ∼1% -40%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=196)
37.1 fps ∼0% -84%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
119 fps ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
116 fps ∼3% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 119, n=4)
102 fps ∼3% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
90 fps ∼3% -24%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
60 fps ∼2% -50%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=200)
23.9 fps ∼1% -80%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
134 fps ∼21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
125 fps ∼20% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (110 - 134, n=4)
125 fps ∼20% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
122 fps ∼20% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
64 fps ∼10% -52%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=130)
25.3 fps ∼4% -81%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
88 fps ∼24% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
82 fps ∼22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (60 - 82, n=4)
71 fps ∼19% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
67 fps ∼18% -18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
44 fps ∼12% -46%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=136)
17.5 fps ∼5% -79%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
93 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
88 fps ∼2% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (75 - 93, n=4)
87.3 fps ∼2% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
86 fps ∼2% -8%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps ∼1% -56%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=82)
22.7 fps ∼0% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
77 fps ∼2% +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
51 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41 - 60, n=4)
49.5 fps ∼1% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
41 fps ∼1% -20%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
34 fps ∼1% -33%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=82)
15.1 fps ∼0% -70%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
30 fps ∼19% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (18 - 35, n=4)
24.3 fps ∼15% +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
21 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
18 fps ∼11% -14%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
13 fps ∼8% -38%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=32)
10.3 fps ∼7% -51%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
22 fps ∼9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
22 fps ∼9% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (22 - 22, n=4)
22 fps ∼9% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
20 fps ∼8% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps ∼7% -23%
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=32)
9.95 fps ∼4% -55%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
47 fps ∼23% +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (27 - 54, n=4)
37 fps ∼18% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
33 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
27 fps ∼13% -18%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
17 fps ∼8% -48%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=32)
15.5 fps ∼8% -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
58 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
57 fps ∼10% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (46 - 58, n=4)
54.8 fps ∼9% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
54 (20min) fps ∼9% -7%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
41 fps ∼7% -29%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=32)
26.6 fps ∼5% -54%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
57 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
53 fps ∼12% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (46 - 57, n=4)
52.8 fps ∼12% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
50 fps ∼11% -12%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
38 fps ∼9% -33%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=58)
16.3 fps ∼4% -71%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
45 fps ∼17% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (24 - 52, n=4)
34.3 fps ∼13% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
32 fps ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
24 fps ∼9% -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
21 fps ∼8% -34%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=58)
10.2 fps ∼4% -68%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
712218 Points ∼95% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
595466 Points ∼79% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
584052 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (490260 - 622888, n=4)
571612 Points ∼76% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
490260 Points ∼65% -16%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
409039 Points ∼54% -30%
Average of class Tablet (78450 - 751846, n=16)
324526 Points ∼43% -44%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
1514 Points ∼74% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
1409 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1268 - 1621, n=4)
1407 Points ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
1268 Points ∼62% -10%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
1032 Points ∼51% -27%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=123)
772 Points ∼38% -45%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
12048 Points ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (11773 - 12048, n=4)
11899 Points ∼41% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
11773 Points ∼41% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
11567 Points ∼40% -4%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8775 Points ∼30% -27%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=124)
2440 Points ∼8% -80%
Memory
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
7945 Points ∼90% +22%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
6751 Points ∼76% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5918 - 8056, n=4)
6654 Points ∼75% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
6501 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
5918 Points ∼67% -9%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=124)
1304 Points ∼15% -80%
System
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
10002 Points ∼61% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (8965 - 9901, n=4)
9264 Points ∼56% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8994 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
8965 Points ∼54% 0%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
8215 Points ∼50% -9%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=124)
2712 Points ∼16% -70%
Overall
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro
6072 Points ∼72% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (5305 - 6247, n=4)
5656 Points ∼67% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
5592 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
5305 Points ∼63% -5%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
4738 Points ∼56% -15%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=123)
1426 Points ∼17% -74%

Legende

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 Apple A12Z Bionic, Apple A12Z Bionic GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 990, ARM Mali-G76 MP16, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus), Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
124.503 Points ∼100% +73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
72.541 Points ∼58% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (69.8 - 75.5, n=4)
72.4 Points ∼58% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
71.821 Points ∼58%
Average of class Tablet (14 - 126, n=19)
61.7 Points ∼50% -14%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
55.115 Points ∼44% -23%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
274.4 Points ∼100% +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
127.58 Points ∼46% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (122 - 132, n=4)
127 Points ∼46% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
126.98 Points ∼46%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
101.24 Points ∼37% -20%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=108)
61 Points ∼22% -52%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
141 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
126 Points ∼89% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (114 - 126, n=4)
120 Points ∼85% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
116 Points ∼82%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
97 Points ∼69% -16%
Average of class Tablet (13 - 182, n=43)
74.8 Points ∼53% -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chome 80)
125 runs/min ∼100% +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
71.3 runs/min ∼57% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
70.9 runs/min ∼57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (41.2 - 73.3, n=4)
64.2 runs/min ∼51% -9%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
63.9 runs/min ∼51% -10%
Average of class Tablet (5.68 - 139, n=28)
55 runs/min ∼44% -22%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
42372 Points ∼100% +60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
27360 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (25953 - 27360, n=4)
26679 Points ∼63% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
26495 Points ∼63%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
19885 Points ∼47% -25%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=193)
7803 Points ∼18% -71%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=205)
8823 ms * ∼100% -364%
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8 (Huawei Browser V10.1.2)
2344.9 ms * ∼27% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus (Samsung Browser 12.1)
1947 ms * ∼22% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) (1854 - 1947, n=4)
1908 ms * ∼22% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 (Chrome86)
1900.3 ms * ∼22%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 (Chrome 80)
646.4 ms * ∼7% +66%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 PlusAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
1%
4%
-2%
-69%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
69.04 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.72 (NM Card)
4%
69.32 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
69
0%
50.2 (14 - 73.8, n=72)
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
86 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.42 (NM Card)
-4%
85.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
86
0%
68.1 (17.6 - 87.7, n=72)
-21%
Random Write 4KB
211.5
262.42
24%
204.97
-3%
201 (121 - 244, n=4)
-5%
11.5 (0.13 - 262, n=224)
-95%
Random Read 4KB
218.97
224.61
3%
230.14
5%
199 (133 - 230, n=4)
-9%
25.9 (1.04 - 230, n=224)
-88%
Sequential Write 256KB
680.21
398.96
-41%
731.99
8%
701 (674 - 728, n=4)
3%
57 (2.04 - 732, n=224)
-92%
Sequential Read 256KB
1511.54
1788.66
18%
1674.99
11%
1538 (1348 - 1659, n=4)
2%
149 (6.75 - 1789, n=224)
-90%
PUBG
010203040506070Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø59.9 (58-60)
; HD: Ø59.7 (52-61)
; Ultra HD: Ø40 (39-41)
Asphalt 9 Legends
0102030405060Tooltip
: Ø57.3 (44-60)
Max. Belasting
 28.1 °C27.4 °C33.4 °C 
 28.8 °C26.5 °C33.5 °C 
 27.8 °C25.4 °C32.2 °C 
Maximum: 33.5 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.2 °C
25.6 °C27.1 °C28.5 °C
25.3 °C27.3 °C29.8 °C
25 °C26.3 °C28.1 °C
Maximum: 29.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 27 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  24.8 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.6 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.523.22521.326.73118.426.44022.5275020.333.56315.828.48015.735.710016.746.912515.153.51601561.920010.662.125014.167.331510.872.140010.973.650010.577.46308.877.28001075.7100010.179125011.177160011.97720001174.6250012.171.6315012.574.4400012.778.5500013.476630013.879.180001576100001475.61250014.1651600014.157.3SPL24.488.4N0.584median 12.5median 74.6Delta2642.340.440.741.131.138.634.34334.751.928.946.423.840.926.249.42253.720.757.32157.218.657.117.762.517.268.31970.51771.515.27217.369.715.468.618.564.615.958.715.165.614.464.314.860.115.161.215.363.815.664.915.961.416.161.216.65760.869.667.428.378.515.224.219.31.145.8median 16.6median 62.51.65.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S7Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPad Pro 11 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.16 / 4.42 / 4.43 Watt
Belasting midlight 8.86 / 11.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
10090 mAh
Power Consumption
-25%
-13%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
1.16
1.3
-12%
1.98
-71%
2.41
-108%
Idle Average *
4.42
3.5
21%
5.66
-28%
3.4
23%
Idle Maximum *
4.43
5.6
-26%
5.69
-28%
3.43
23%
Load Average *
8.86
12.5
-41%
6.96
21%
6.63
25%
Load Maximum *
11.6
19.2
-66%
6.98
40%
10.29
11%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
32h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 45min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
3h 41min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7
8000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 11 2020
7538 mAh
Huawei MatePad Pro 10.8
7250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Plus
10090 mAh
Batterijduur
2%
4%
-18%
Reader / Idle
1963
2001
2%
1877
-4%
898
-54%
H.264
885
936
6%
909
3%
620
-30%
WiFi v1.3
811
902
11%
891
10%
425
-48%
Load
221
197
-11%
233
5%
355
61%

Pro

+ contrastrijk 120 Hz scherm
+ hoog prestatieniveau
+ snelle opslag
+ bouwkwaliteit
+ geweldige sprekers
+ S Pen

Contra

- de aan / uit-knop is te diep in het frame geplaatst
- "slechts" 6 GB RAM
- geen 5G-modem
- PWM
- geen IP-classificatie
- 45 Watt snellader niet inbegrepen in de doos

Samenvatting van de Galaxy Tab S7: Samsung doet veel goed, maar niet alles!

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S7. Testmodel geleverd door: notebooksbilliger.de
Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S7. Testmodel geleverd door: notebooksbilliger.de

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 is een aantrekkelijke Android-tablet die in staat is om de rest van de high-end, maar toch ietwat zuinige concurrentie een kans te geven voor zijn geld. In feite is de enige echte concurrent in de Android-ruimte Huawei’s MatePad Pro, die enkele zwakke punten heeft die de Tab S7 niet heeft. De Samsung tablet heeft een vingerafdruksensor, een 120 Hz-paneel en geen cameragat, waardoor het gedeelte van het scherm eromheen donkerder wordt. Bovendien ondersteunt de Tab S7 Google Play Services en de Huawei slate niet.

Naast de geweldige luidsprekers, snelle UFS-opslag en de krachtige Qualcomm SoC, vonden we de meegeleverde S Pen en de functionaliteit die deze biedt ook nuttig. De bouwkwaliteit is van een zeer goed niveau. De matte oppervlakken zorgen echter niet voor veel grip.

De Galaxy Tab S7 is een uitstekende Android-tablet, die niet zo goed wordt behandeld als hij verdient.

Al met al stelt de premiumtablet zich voor meer kritiek open dan de Galaxy S20-smartphones. Het heeft bijvoorbeeld niet zulke premium functies als een IP-certificering, een NFC-chip of draadloos opladen. Het feit dat de doos geen snellader van 45 Watt bevat, is moeilijk te begrijpen gezien de hoge adviesprijs van het apparaat. Het is ook moeilijk te begrijpen waarom de Tab S7 slechts 6 GB RAM heeft terwijl er een 8 GB-versie van de Tab S6 was en de Note 20 Ultra daadwerkelijk wordt geleverd met maximaal 16 GB RAM. Het feit dat de mobiele versie van de Tab S7 alleen wordt geleverd met een 4G-modem, is ook behoorlijk verwarrend.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 - 15-10-2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Behuizing
88 / 98 → 89%
Toetsenbord
72 / 80 → 89%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
66 / 70 → 94%
Gewicht
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Batterij
90%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
63 / 78 → 80%
Applicatie-performance
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperatuur
94%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 98%
Camera
57 / 85 → 68%
Gemiddelde
82%
90%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 Tablet - Ongetwijfeld de beste 11-inch Android-tablet
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-10-17 (Update: 2020-10-17)