Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e (Wi-Fi) Tablet

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, 27-05-2019

De nieuwe S-Class. De Galaxy Tab S5e lijkt veel op de Galaxy Tab S4. Hoewel de laatste momenteel het paradepaardje van Samsung is, is de Tab S5e met een adviesprijs van €400 aanzienlijk goedkoper. Deze middenklasse tablet is ook ongeveer 20% lichter. Samsung heeft echter niet op hardware bezuinigd, waardoor de Tab S5e voor sommige mensen een betere keuze zou kunnen zijn dan zijn duurdere zustermodel.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Galaxy Tab S Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 616
Geheugen
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4X
Beeldscherm
10.5 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 288 PPI, 10-punts multitouch touchscreen, Super AMOLED, WQXGA, adaptieve helderheid, Gorilla Glass 3, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 48.2 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Verbindingen: USB Type-C, Card Reader: tot 512 GB microSD kaarten, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, vingerafdrukscanner, gyroscoop, hall sensor, Wi-Fi Direct, USB OTG, ANT +, docking poort (Samsung Pogo Pins), Samsung DeX
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 5.5 x 245 x 160
Batterij
7040 mAh Lithium-Ion
Besturingssysteem
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 1/3.4", f/2.0, 8x digitale zoom, foto's tot 4128x3096 (4:3), video's tot 3,840 x 2,160/30 FPS (UHD)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix 1/4.0", f/2.0, groothoeklens, foto's 3265x2448 (4:3), video's tot 1,920 x 1,080/30 FPS (Full HD)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: AKG quad luidsprekers met Dolby Atmos, Toetsenbord: virtueel, Modulaire lader (9 V/1.67 A, 5 V/2 A), USB Type-A naar Type-C kabel, 3.5 mm audio adapter (USB Type-C), SIM tool, snelstartgids, One UI 1.1, 24 Maanden Garantie, fanless
Gewicht
400 g, Voeding: 30 g
Prijs
429 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

262 mm 159 mm 9.8 mm 497 g258.7 mm 171.8 mm 7.3 mm 498 g250.6 mm 174.1 mm 6.1 mm 456 g249 mm 164 mm 7 mm 482 g245 mm 160 mm 5.5 mm 400 g242 mm 167 mm 7 mm 440 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPad Air 2019
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
540 (min: 499, max: 581) MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
346 (min: 329, max: 362) MBit/s ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼54% -16%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼45% -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼40% -38%
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
214 (min: 206, max: 223) MBit/s ∼40% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
580 MBit/s ∼100% +101%
Apple iPad Air 2019
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
553 (min: 481, max: 580) MBit/s ∼95% +91%
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (min: 314, max: 338) MBit/s ∼56% +13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Adreno 616, 670, 64 GB eMMC Flash
289 (min: 229, max: 300) MBit/s ∼50%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼41% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼39% -21%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (329-362)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø289 (229-300)
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Overzicht
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Overzicht
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Fietsen rondom een meer
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e – Fietsen rondom een meer
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e - Lus
GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e - Lus
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overzicht
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overzicht
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 –  Fietsen rondom een meer
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Fietsen rondom een meer
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Lus
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 – Lus

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
435
cd/m²
436
cd/m²
440
cd/m²
445
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
460
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 481 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 453.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.74 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 90 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 452 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Apple iPad Air 2019
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Lenovo Tab P10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Screen
-69%
-2%
-34%
-131%
-14%
Brightness middle
452
426
-6%
515
14%
382
-15%
522
15%
474
5%
Brightness
453
399
-12%
483
7%
378
-17%
495
9%
477
5%
Brightness Distribution
90
91
1%
90
0%
92
2%
84
-7%
91
1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.41
0.24
0.41
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.5
-165%
1.6
6%
2.8
-65%
6.7
-294%
2.5
-47%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.7
7.9
-114%
4.4
-19%
6
-62%
12.2
-230%
5.8
-57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
5.2
-117%
2.8
-17%
3.5
-46%
9.1
-279%
2.1
12%
Gamma
2.07 106%
2.23 99%
2.21 100%
2.33 94%
2.14 103%
2.08 106%
CCT
6337 103%
6875 95%
6944 94%
6903 94%
9417 69%
6281 103%
Contrast
1121
1256
1592
1273

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 245.1 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 245.1 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 245.1 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9418 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.1 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
5.6 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2.8 ms stijging
↘ 2.8 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (40 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points ∼26% +90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7930 Points ∼18% +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6090 - 6479, n=3)
6348 Points ∼14% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6090 Points ∼14%
Average of class Tablet (862 - 43802, n=38)
6015 Points ∼14% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10
3261 Points ∼7% -46%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -74%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
11490 Points ∼26% +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6477 Points ∼15% +13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5742 Points ∼13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5164 - 5742, n=3)
5359 Points ∼12% -7%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=55)
4639 Points ∼11% -19%
Lenovo Tab P10
3705 Points ∼8% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼8% -42%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
4758 Points ∼75% +178%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1893 Points ∼30% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1712 Points ∼27%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=55)
1653 Points ∼26% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1616 - 1712, n=3)
1651 Points ∼26% -4%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points ∼26% -5%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% -30%
Lenovo Tab P10
747 Points ∼12% -56%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6698 - 7387, n=3)
7154 Points ∼60% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6698 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6315 Points ∼53% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points ∼43% -24%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6698, n=39)
4281 Points ∼36% -36%
Lenovo Tab P10
4250 Points ∼36% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼31% -45%
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8126 - 9458, n=3)
8994 Points ∼46% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
8126 Points ∼41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6954 Points ∼35% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points ∼26% -38%
Lenovo Tab P10
4949 Points ∼25% -39%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼25% -40%
Average of class Tablet (4342 - 8356, n=80)
4594 Points ∼23% -43%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2288 - 2314, n=2)
2301 Points ∼15% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2288 Points ∼15%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 2288, n=5)
868 Points ∼6% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1408 - 1416, n=2)
1412 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1408 Points ∼10%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 1408, n=5)
404 Points ∼3% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1540 - 1550, n=2)
1545 Points ∼10% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1540 Points ∼10%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 1540, n=5)
453 Points ∼3% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3347 Points ∼74% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2919 Points ∼64% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2424 - 2763, n=3)
2573 Points ∼57% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2424 Points ∼53%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2323 Points ∼51% -4%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼40% -26%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 3347, n=43)
1600 Points ∼35% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1386 Points ∼31% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
6484 Points ∼79% +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
4086 Points ∼50% +153%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2069 Points ∼25% +28%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 6993, n=43)
1631 Points ∼20% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1612 Points ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1611 - 1612, n=3)
1612 Points ∼20% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
528 Points ∼6% -67%
Lenovo Tab P10
414 Points ∼5% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 2019
5367 Points ∼85% +208%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼59% +115%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2121 Points ∼34% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1742 - 1772, n=3)
1756 Points ∼28% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1742 Points ∼28%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 5367, n=44)
1397 Points ∼22% -20%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
612 Points ∼10% -65%
Lenovo Tab P10
499 Points ∼8% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3493 Points ∼74% +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼63% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2413 - 2771, n=3)
2560 Points ∼54% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2413 Points ∼51%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2101 Points ∼45% -13%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼38% -26%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=48)
1643 Points ∼35% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1399 Points ∼30% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
15399 Points ∼54% +508%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼13% +45%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=48)
3099 Points ∼11% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2533 - 2537, n=3)
2535 Points ∼9% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2534 Points ∼9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2208 Points ∼8% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
754 Points ∼3% -70%
Lenovo Tab P10
711 Points ∼2% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 2019
8763 Points ∼65% +250%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼28% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2506 - 2582, n=3)
2539 Points ∼19% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2506 Points ∼19%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2183 Points ∼16% -13%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=48)
2050 Points ∼15% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
840 Points ∼6% -66%
Lenovo Tab P10
821 Points ∼6% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3312 Points ∼77% +36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼68% +21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2436 - 2728, n=3)
2543 Points ∼59% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2436 Points ∼56%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points ∼56% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10
1832 Points ∼42% -25%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 3312, n=62)
1474 Points ∼34% -39%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼32% -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
5760 Points ∼91% +297%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼58% +154%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points ∼24% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1451 - 1487, n=3)
1473 Points ∼23% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1451 Points ∼23%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 5760, n=62)
1193 Points ∼19% -18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼6% -72%
Lenovo Tab P10
364 Points ∼6% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Air 2019
4949 Points ∼86% +210%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼61% +119%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points ∼29% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1594 - 1651, n=3)
1625 Points ∼28% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1594 Points ∼28%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 4949, n=68)
1052 Points ∼18% -34%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼9% -69%
Lenovo Tab P10
443 Points ∼8% -72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
3180 Points ∼71% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼66% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2456 - 2708, n=3)
2551 Points ∼57% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2456 Points ∼55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points ∼55% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
1814 Points ∼41% -26%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 3184, n=64)
1443 Points ∼32% -41%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼30% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
10647 Points ∼100% +352%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼35% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2357 - 2428, n=3)
2401 Points ∼23% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2357 Points ∼22%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=64)
1731 Points ∼16% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points ∼16% -27%
Lenovo Tab P10
691 Points ∼6% -71%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼6% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad Air 2019
6997 Points ∼89% +194%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼45% +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2378 - 2477, n=3)
2432 Points ∼31% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2378 Points ∼30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points ∼24% -23%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=68)
1359 Points ∼17% -43%
Lenovo Tab P10
801 Points ∼10% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼9% -71%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Air 2019
27663 Points ∼32% +112%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
19037 Points ∼22% +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13055 - 18523, n=3)
15403 Points ∼18% +18%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼17% +16%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼17% +13%
Lenovo Tab P10
14108 Points ∼16% +8%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=152)
13331 Points ∼15% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
13055 Points ∼15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
160399 Points ∼30% +617%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
56368 Points ∼11% +152%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼7% +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (22381 - 35596, n=3)
31126 Points ∼6% +39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
22381 Points ∼4%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=152)
20201 Points ∼4% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% -43%
Lenovo Tab P10
12400 Points ∼2% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
77626 Points ∼33% +302%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
39260 Points ∼17% +103%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼11% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19315 - 29229, n=3)
25181 Points ∼11% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
19315 Points ∼8%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=153)
15950 Points ∼7% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% -32%
Lenovo Tab P10
12743 Points ∼5% -34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Air 2019
261 fps ∼2% +467%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps ∼1% +109%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
69 fps ∼1% +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (46 - 58, n=3)
54 fps ∼0% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
46 fps ∼0%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=178)
32 fps ∼0% -30%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼0% -52%
Lenovo Tab P10
21 fps ∼0% -54%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Air 2019
59.9 fps ∼2% +87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
58 fps ∼2% +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32 - 53, n=3)
45.7 fps ∼1% +43%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps ∼1% +25%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
32 fps ∼1%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼1% -34%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=182)
21 fps ∼1% -34%
Lenovo Tab P10
20 fps ∼1% -37%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Air 2019
139 fps ∼25% +379%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
60 fps ∼11% +107%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps ∼8% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
29 fps ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29 - 29, n=3)
29 fps ∼5% 0%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=116)
21 fps ∼4% -28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -66%
Lenovo Tab P10
9.2 fps ∼2% -68%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Air 2019
58.5 fps ∼16% +244%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
36 fps ∼10% +112%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps ∼7% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (17 - 28, n=3)
24 fps ∼7% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
17 fps ∼5%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=119)
14.7 fps ∼4% -14%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -44%
Lenovo Tab P10
8.7 fps ∼2% -49%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
96 fps ∼2% +405%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
41 fps ∼1% +116%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 173, n=65)
19.9 fps ∼0% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (19 - 20, n=3)
19.7 fps ∼0% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
19 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼0% -5%
Lenovo Tab P10
6 fps ∼0% -68%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼0% -74%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
51.2 fps ∼1% +642%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22 fps ∼1% +219%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps ∼0% +117%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.9 - 19, n=3)
15 fps ∼0% +117%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=65)
12.5 fps ∼0% +81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.9 fps ∼0%
Lenovo Tab P10
5.7 fps ∼0% -17%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼0% -32%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
26.4 fps ∼17% +514%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 49, n=15)
10.5 fps ∼7% +144%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
8.9 fps ∼6% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.3 - 7.2, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼3% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
4.3 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.9 fps ∼1% -56%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
26.3 fps ∼24% +498%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 51.1, n=15)
11.7 fps ∼11% +166%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
9.3 fps ∼8% +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (4.4 - 7, n=3)
5.3 fps ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
4.4 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.1 fps ∼1% -75%
Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
40.4 fps ∼20% +494%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 58, n=15)
15.1 fps ∼8% +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14 fps ∼7% +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.8 - 11, n=3)
9.6 fps ∼5% +41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.8 fps ∼3%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.2 fps ∼2% -53%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
70.5 fps ∼28% +488%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 134, n=15)
31.3 fps ∼12% +161%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼10% +108%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
12 fps ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12, n=3)
12 fps ∼5% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼1% -72%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
62.8 fps ∼16% +639%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼6% +194%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼5% +112%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 107, n=44)
13.4 fps ∼3% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (8.5 - 11, n=3)
10.2 fps ∼3% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
8.5 fps ∼2%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼1% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -76%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 2019
35.8 fps ∼21% +459%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
13 fps ∼8% +103%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps ∼6% +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (6.4 - 11, n=3)
9.13 fps ∼5% +43%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 47, n=44)
7.71 fps ∼5% +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
6.4 fps ∼4%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.3 fps ∼2% -48%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -69%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
21.79 (min: 12.48, max: 36) fps ∼23% +66%
Average of class Tablet (8.72 - 21.8, n=3)
14.5 fps ∼16% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (13.1 - 13.8, n=2)
13.4 fps ∼14% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
13.1 fps ∼14%
Vulkan Medium Native
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
14.78 (min: 9.16, max: 37.68) fps ∼41% +93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (7.67 - 11.6, n=2)
9.65 fps ∼27% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7.67 fps ∼21%
Average of class Tablet (7.67 - 14.8, n=3)
7.48 fps ∼21% -2%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22.71 (min: 13.73, max: 55.41) fps ∼16% +89%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (12 - 12.5, n=2)
12.2 fps ∼9% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
12.04 fps ∼9%
Average of class Tablet (12 - 22.7, n=3)
11.6 fps ∼8% -4%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
370545 Points ∼65% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
201881 Points ∼36% +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
156772 Points ∼28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (153450 - 158868, n=3)
156363 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 566378, n=31)
147105 Points ∼26% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
113687 Points ∼20% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% -50%
Lenovo Tab P10
71739 Points ∼13% -54%
VRMark - Amber Room
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3130 Score ∼62% +120%
Average of class Tablet (1423 - 3130, n=2)
2277 Score ∼45% +60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1423 - 1473, n=2)
1448 Score ∼29% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1423 Score ∼28%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad Air 2019
1734 Points ∼85% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1218 Points ∼60% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (1144 - 1229, n=3)
1186 Points ∼58% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
1144 Points ∼56%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼50% -12%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points ∼40% -29%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=109)
753 Points ∼37% -34%
Lenovo Tab P10
734 Points ∼36% -36%
Graphics
Apple iPad Air 2019
15614 Points ∼54% +454%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6080 Points ∼21% +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2816 Points ∼10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2815 - 2818, n=3)
2816 Points ∼10% 0%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=109)
2249 Points ∼8% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points ∼6% -43%
Lenovo Tab P10
951 Points ∼3% -66%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -70%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2894 - 3316, n=3)
3166 Points ∼42% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2900 Points ∼39% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2894 Points ∼39%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points ∼35% -8%
Apple iPad Air 2019
2095 Points ∼28% -28%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼20% -48%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=109)
1072 Points ∼14% -63%
Lenovo Tab P10
853 Points ∼11% -71%
System
Apple iPad Air 2019
12591 Points ∼76% +137%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
5537 Points ∼34% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (5315 - 5507, n=3)
5434 Points ∼33% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
5315 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Tab P10
2861 Points ∼17% -46%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points ∼17% -47%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=109)
2463 Points ∼15% -54%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -56%
Overall
Apple iPad Air 2019
5169 Points ∼61% +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3302 Points ∼39% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (2653 - 2811, n=3)
2753 Points ∼33% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
2653 Points ∼31%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points ∼21% -33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -51%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=109)
1278 Points ∼15% -52%
Lenovo Tab P10
1142 Points ∼14% -57%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad Air 2019
2873 Points ∼54% +547%
Average of class Tablet (301 - 5300, n=17)
1526 Points ∼29% +244%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (444 - 447, n=2)
446 Points ∼8% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
444 Points ∼8%

Legende

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Qualcomm Snapdragon 670, Qualcomm Adreno 616, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Air 2019 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
109.573 Points ∼100% +226%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 110, n=6)
45.9 Points ∼42% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
33.6 Points ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=3)
33.1 Points ∼30% -1%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
156 Points ∼100% +136%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
77 Points ∼49% +17%
Average of class Tablet (23 - 182, n=20)
73.7 Points ∼47% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
66 Points ∼42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (62 - 66, n=2)
64 Points ∼41% -3%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
123 runs/min ∼100% +265%
Average of class Tablet (11.1 - 132, n=10)
58.9 runs/min ∼48% +75%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
33.74 runs/min ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.5 - 33.7, n=2)
33.1 runs/min ∼27% -2%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
41770 Points ∼100% +269%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
12897 Points ∼31% +14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
11312 Points ∼27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10844 - 11312, n=3)
11071 Points ∼27% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼21% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼16% -40%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=170)
6729 Points ∼16% -41%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
4075 Points ∼10% -64%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
11352 ms * ∼100% -225%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=181)
9243 ms * ∼81% -164%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼52% -70%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼35% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136)
3496.3 ms * ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3589, n=3)
3482 ms * ∼31% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
2644.7 ms * ∼23% +24%
Apple iPad Air 2019 (Safari Mobile 12)
643.5 ms * ∼6% +82%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720Amazon Fire HD 10 2017Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8Lenovo Tab P10Samsung Galaxy Tab S4Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
29%
-7%
44%
-6%
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.76 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-50%
73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
22%
60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
59.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-3%
55.9 (11.2 - 74.7, n=101)
-8%
44.9 (14.6 - 73.8, n=53)
-26%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
76.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-27%
85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
12%
84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
11%
80.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
74 (41.7 - 87.2, n=101)
-3%
62.4 (21.2 - 87.7, n=53)
-18%
Random Write 4KB
18.79
9.37
-50%
60.8
224%
15.75
-16%
24.43
30%
24 (3.4 - 88.2, n=112)
28%
5.82 (0.13 - 77.9, n=204)
-69%
Random Read 4KB
79.19
27.72
-65%
54.7
-31%
53.9
-32%
141.96
79%
54.3 (11.4 - 149, n=112)
-31%
18.7 (1.32 - 142, n=204)
-76%
Sequential Write 256KB
197.05
147.67
-25%
126.8
-36%
205.74
4%
195.76
-1%
171 (40 - 246, n=112)
-13%
38.8 (2.04 - 208, n=204)
-80%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.35
262.2
-11%
247.8
-16%
276.7
-6%
740.54
152%
273 (95.6 - 704, n=112)
-7%
110 (6.75 - 741, n=204)
-63%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; 0.12.0: Ø29.5 (7-31)
Dead Trigger 2
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.5.5: Ø60.1 (49-61)
Shadow Fight 3
010203040506070Tooltip
; 1.18.3: Ø59.6 (2-61)
Max. Belasting
 32.6 °C29 °C28.1 °C 
 33.1 °C28.8 °C28 °C 
 31.8 °C30.7 °C29.6 °C 
Maximum: 33.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 30.2 °C
27.9 °C29.1 °C29.8 °C
27.6 °C28.4 °C30.4 °C
27.7 °C28.8 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 31.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 29 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  31.1 °C | Kamertemperatuur 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
Hittefoto van de onderkant onder zware belasting
Hittefoto van de onderkant onder zware belasting
Hittefoto van de achterkant onder zware belasting
Hittefoto van de achterkant onder zware belasting
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.143.32527.434.43125.525.54024.527.45036.136.56326.127.88024.333.610022.14212519.145.616020.25820019.460.225016.560.331515.168.140015.366.95001471.163014.570.78001473.8100014.573.6125014.572.7160014.374200014.673.225001470315014.765.5400014.365.4500014.870.4630014.671.2800014.470.81000014.671.41250014.764.9160001552.9SPL26.783.3N0.860.4median 14.6median 70Delta1.55.428.630.224.926.624.624.426.422.530.824.623.619.820.221.119.928.817.642.919.159.719.159.617.456.616.961.616.863.515.166.316.567.815.666.41561.915.565.115.367.615.771.515.569.715.572.815.467.915.8641663.815.860.816.154.716.151.617.349.727.979.9146.4median 16median 63.50.65.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 2.07 / 3.94 / 3.96 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.07 / 5.73 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7040 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2019
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Power Consumption
-26%
-60%
-56%
-3%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
2.07
1.55
25%
2.18
-5%
2.01
3%
1.01
51%
1.76
15%
Idle Average *
3.94
4.17
-6%
6.4
-62%
5.4
-37%
4.16
-6%
4.22
-7%
Idle Maximum *
3.96
4.25
-7%
6.43
-62%
5.44
-37%
4.17
-5%
4.25
-7%
Load Average *
4.07
7.13
-75%
7.48
-84%
8.55
-110%
5.45
-34%
4.52
-11%
Load Maximum *
5.73
9.63
-68%
10.65
-86%
11.53
-101%
6.9
-20%
7.35
-28%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
21h 03min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
10h 23min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 24min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
5h 00min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720
7040 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Apple iPad Air 2019
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Batterijduur
-20%
-3%
-11%
16%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1263
960
-24%
1501
19%
1344
6%
1315
4%
1227
-3%
H.264
864
585
-32%
684
-21%
702
-19%
910
5%
735
-15%
WiFi v1.3
623
542
-13%
738
18%
648
4%
992
59%
495
-21%
Load
300
274
-9%
214
-29%
196
-35%
289
-4%
245
-18%

Pro

+ dun en stijf ontwerp
+ relatief licht voor een 10,5-inch tablet
+ Samsung DeX-ondersteuning
+ snelle Wi-Fi
+ indrukwekkend Super AMOLED-display
+ solide SoC-prestaties
+ moderne games lopen soepel
+ quad-luidsprekers
+ Dolby Atmos-ondersteuning
+ lage oppervlaktetemperaturen, zelfs onder belasting
+ goede batterijlevensduur

Contra

- geen IP certificering
- geen NFC
- middelmatige camera's
- PWM
De Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e tablet. Testmodel geleverd door Notebooksbilliger.de.
De Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e tablet. Testmodel geleverd door Notebooksbilliger.de.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e heeft een uitstekende prijs-kwaliteitverhouding en is een degelijke all-round tablet. Het apparaat heeft een helder en contrastrijk Super AMOLED 10,5-inch beeldscherm en een SoC die zelfs de meest complexe moderne games aankan. Op dezelfde manier bieden de luidsprekers een meeslepende game-ervaring, terwijl de batterijlevensduur je niet tekort zal doen tijdens lange spel- of filmsessies.

De tablet is ook goed gebouwd en licht, wat niet altijd het geval is met tablets uit de middenklasse. Het metalen ontwerp en de dunne beeldschermranden maken het apparaat er duurder uitzien dan het werkelijk is. Bovendien maakt de DeX ondersteuning en de optionele toetsenbord-cover de Tab S5e meer dan alleen een multimediatablet.

Er zijn enkele zwakke punten, maar deze zitten er maar weinig tussen. Samsung heeft de tablet uitgerust met middelmatige camera's, en het weglaten van een NFC-chip is teleurstellend. We raden u ook aan om de Tab S5e persoonlijk uit te proberen als u gevoelig bent voor PWM, omdat het beeldscherm flikkert op een frequentie die bij langdurig gebruik vermoeide ogen en hoofdpijn kan veroorzaken.

De Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e is een waardig alternatief voor duurdere tablets zoals de Tab S4 en iPad Air (2019). Het biedt praktisch alles wat de meeste mensen van een tablet willen, maar voor een betaalbare prijs en zonder veel compromissen.

Over het algemeen is de Tab S5e niet alleen een van de best geprijsde tablets die je op dit moment zou kunnen kopen, maar maakt het ook krachtigere tablets lastig. De Tab S4 blijft echter een betere multimediatablet, vanwege zijn krachtigere SoC, RAM met hoge capaciteit en snellere interne opslag. De penondersteuning laat ons ook neigen in het voordeel van de Tab S4.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 - 22-05-2019 v6
Manuel Masiero

Behuizing
87%
Toetsenbord
75 / 80 → 93%
Aanwijsapparaat
88%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
52 / 65 → 79%
Gewicht
85 / 40-88 → 93%
Batterij
94%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
56 / 68 → 82%
Applicatie-performance
65 / 76 → 85%
Temperatuur
93%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 84%
Camera
51 / 85 → 60%
Gemiddelde
78%
89%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e (Wi-Fi) Tablet
Manuel Masiero, 2019-05-27 (Update: 2019-05-27)