Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Tablet

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn, 08-11-2018

Room for improvement. Samsung heeft zijn vlaggenschip-tablet geüpgraded, wat waarschijnlijk een van de laatste Android-tablets is met zowel geavanceerde specificaties als pen-invoer. De Galaxy Tab S4 heeft echter enkele tekortkomingen. Ontdek in dit artikel op welke gebieden de Tab S4 tekortschiet en voor wie het een zinvolle aankoop is.

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Galaxy Tab S Serie)
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 540
Geheugen
4096 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Beeldscherm
10.5 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 288 PPI, Capacitief, 10-punts multitouch, Super AMOLED, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB 
, 50.7 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Card Reader: Tot 400 GB microSD/SDHC/SDXC kaarten; FAT, FAT32, exFAT ondersteunde bestandssystemen, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Iris scanner, Gezichtsherkenning, Accelerometer, Positiesensor, Hall sensor, G-sensor, Digitaal kompas, OTG, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung DeX
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7 x 249 x 164
Batterij
7300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (Autofocus, LED Flash, UHD video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (Fixed Focus)
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Vier luidsprekers, Toetsenbord: Virtueel toetsenbord, Lader, USB Type-A naar Type-C kabel, Card slot tool, Snelstartgids, Samsung Experience 9.5, 24 Maanden Garantie, SAR waardes: Body – W/kg, Head – W/kg. LDAC, aptX, fanless
Gewicht
482 g
Prijs
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
615 MBit/s ∼100% +112%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
528 MBit/s ∼86% +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼47%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
262 MBit/s ∼43% -10%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
241 MBit/s ∼39% -17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
236 MBit/s ∼38% -19%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
580 MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996, 32 GB eMMC Flash
569 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
A10X Fusion GPU, A10X Fusion, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
497 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
PowerVR GX6250, MT8176, 64 GB eMMC Flash
240 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB eMMC Flash
238 MBit/s ∼41% -59%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
PowerVR GX6250, MT8173, 64 GB eMMC Flash
227 MBit/s ∼39% -61%
Garmin Edge 500 - Overzicht
Garmin Edge 500 - Overzicht
Garmin Edge 500 – Rond een meer
Garmin Edge 500 – Rond een meer
Garmin Edge 500 - Lus
Garmin Edge 500 - Lus
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Overzicht
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Overzicht
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 – Rond een meer
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 – Rond een meer
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Lus
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - Lus

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Foto van onze testkaart
Foto van onze testkaart
Testkaart in detail
Het optionele toetsenbord van de Tab S4
Het optionele toetsenbord van de Tab S4
457
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
474
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
495
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 502 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 477.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.82 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 91 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 474 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Zwart: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.5
Gamma: 2.08
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
Super AMOLED, 2048x1526, 9.7
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
IPS, 2224x1668, 10.5
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1
Screen
14%
14%
-100%
-48%
-159%
Brightness middle
474
452
-5%
634
34%
384
-19%
426
-10%
340
-28%
Brightness
477
468
-2%
625
31%
360
-25%
399
-16%
320
-33%
Brightness Distribution
91
82
-10%
87
-4%
84
-8%
91
0%
84
-8%
Black Level *
0.39
0.8
0.38
0.19
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.5
1.8
28%
1.9
24%
6.83
-173%
4.5
-80%
15
-500%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.8
4
31%
3.9
33%
12.7
-119%
7.9
-36%
22.8
-293%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.1
1.2
43%
2.8
-33%
7.5
-257%
5.2
-148%
4
-90%
Gamma
2.08 106%
2.11 104%
2.26 97%
2.199 100%
2.23 99%
2.09 105%
CCT
6281 103%
6500 100%
7027 93%
8544 76%
6875 95%
6940 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.32
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.06
Contrast
1626
480
1121
1789

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 240.4 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 99 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 240.4 Hz is redelijk laag en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering kunnen dit dus waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen (gebruikmakend van de vermelde helderheid en lager).

Ter vergelijking: 52 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 8651 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
       Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (25.6 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
       Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
4.8 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 2.8 ms stijging
↘ 2 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde erg snelle responstijden in onze tests en zou zeer geschikt moeten zijn voor snelle games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd beter is dan het gemiddelde (41 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
217439 Points ∼87% +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
176131 Points ∼70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (150208 - 185487, n=17)
173235 Points ∼69% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
157445 Points ∼63% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
144426 Points ∼58% -18%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
78980 Points ∼31% -55%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=59)
71242 Points ∼28% -60%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
63777 Points ∼25% -64%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (201881 - 217442, n=8)
208685 Points ∼37% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
201881 Points ∼36%
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=15)
176133 Points ∼31% -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
175581 Points ∼31% -13%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
77717 Points ∼14% -62%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (5603 - 7223, n=19)
6702 Points ∼65% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6315 Points ∼61%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6039 Points ∼59% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5432 Points ∼53% -14%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
4827 Points ∼47% -24%
Average of class Tablet (2345 - 6315, n=25)
4305 Points ∼42% -32%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3678 Points ∼36% -42%
Work performance score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (6854 - 8553, n=19)
7820 Points ∼59% +12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6954 Points ∼53%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6830 Points ∼52% -2%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5843 Points ∼44% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
5608 Points ∼42% -19%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4895 Points ∼37% -30%
Average of class Tablet (2529 - 7053, n=67)
4487 Points ∼34% -35%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1009 - 1329, n=17)
1222 Points ∼62% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1218 Points ∼62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1010 Points ∼51% -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1007 Points ∼51% -17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
913 Points ∼46% -25%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
803 Points ∼41% -34%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 1979, n=96)
731 Points ∼37% -40%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6080 Points ∼21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (5791 - 6273, n=17)
6052 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4941 Points ∼17% -19%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2284 Points ∼8% -62%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=96)
1833 Points ∼6% -70%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
833 Points ∼3% -86%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
701 Points ∼2% -88%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1501 - 4423, n=17)
3137 Points ∼50% +8%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3108 Points ∼49% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2900 Points ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1931 Points ∼31% -33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1513 Points ∼24% -48%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=96)
1025 Points ∼16% -65%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
968 Points ∼15% -67%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (4238 - 5926, n=17)
5690 Points ∼35% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
5537 Points ∼34%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
3639 Points ∼22% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3505 Points ∼21% -37%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2329 Points ∼14% -58%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=96)
2124 Points ∼13% -62%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1957 Points ∼12% -65%
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2702 - 3790, n=17)
3367 Points ∼40% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3302 Points ∼39%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2409 Points ∼29% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2204 Points ∼26% -33%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1312 Points ∼16% -60%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=96)
1157 Points ∼14% -65%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1016 Points ∼12% -69%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7930 Points ∼19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (7462 - 8281, n=13)
7893 Points ∼19% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
7063 Points ∼17% -11%
Average of class Tablet (862 - 41735, n=22)
5723 Points ∼14% -28%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3081 Points ∼7% -61%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1562 Points ∼4% -80%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
9358 Points ∼26% +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (6006 - 6799, n=18)
6515 Points ∼18% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6477 Points ∼18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
6173 Points ∼17% -5%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 17691, n=34)
4320 Points ∼12% -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4187 Points ∼12% -35%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
3305 Points ∼9% -49%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
2489 Points ∼7% -62%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3933 Points ∼62% +108%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1809 - 1973, n=18)
1917 Points ∼30% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1893 Points ∼30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1892 Points ∼30% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1745 Points ∼28% -8%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1541 Points ∼24% -19%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=34)
1491 Points ∼24% -21%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1204 Points ∼19% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1628 - 3157, n=18)
2891 Points ∼69% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2416 Points ∼58% -18%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
2027 Points ∼48% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1798 Points ∼43% -39%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 2952, n=48)
1447 Points ∼35% -51%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1363 Points ∼33% -54%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
843 Points ∼20% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4537 Points ∼84% +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3560 - 4072, n=18)
3901 Points ∼72% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2943 Points ∼55% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1646 Points ∼31% -55%
Average of class Tablet (102 - 5384, n=48)
1196 Points ∼22% -68%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
557 Points ∼10% -85%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
413 Points ∼8% -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2895 - 3810, n=18)
3609 Points ∼76% +3%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
3558 Points ∼75% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
2578 Points ∼54% -26%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
1771 Points ∼37% -49%
Average of class Tablet (134 - 3806, n=53)
1047 Points ∼22% -70%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
602 Points ∼13% -83%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
489 Points ∼10% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (1574 - 3092, n=17)
2795 Points ∼67% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2366 Points ∼57% -20%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
1960 Points ∼47% -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
1811 Points ∼44% -39%
Average of class Tablet (810 - 2952, n=51)
1379 Points ∼33% -53%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
1347 Points ∼32% -54%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
1128 Points ∼27% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
7212 Points ∼87% +96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3682 - 6231, n=17)
5615 Points ∼68% +52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
4626 Points ∼56% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼44%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2392 Points ∼29% -35%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 7525, n=51)
1630 Points ∼20% -56%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
884 Points ∼11% -76%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
598 Points ∼7% -84%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3407 - 5030, n=17)
4558 Points ∼71% +31%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
4521 Points ∼71% +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
3438 Points ∼54% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
2386 Points ∼37% -32%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 4588, n=55)
1288 Points ∼20% -63%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
929 Points ∼15% -73%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
682 Points ∼11% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
21886 Points ∼28% +15%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
19534 Points ∼25% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (6729 - 23046, n=20)
19196 Points ∼24% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
19037 Points ∼24%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
15117 Points ∼19% -21%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
14456 Points ∼18% -24%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 27021, n=135)
12770 Points ∼16% -33%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
9729 Points ∼12% -49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
110148 Points ∼21% +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
56368 Points ∼11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (16794 - 58360, n=20)
53776 Points ∼10% -5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
35076 Points ∼7% -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34002 Points ∼6% -40%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 110971, n=135)
16661 Points ∼3% -70%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
12771 Points ∼2% -77%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11719 Points ∼2% -79%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
54237 Points ∼25% +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
39260 Points ∼18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (12604 - 42278, n=20)
37906 Points ∼18% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
30277 Points ∼14% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
26634 Points ∼13% -32%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 54449, n=136)
14162 Points ∼7% -64%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
13227 Points ∼6% -66%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
11209 Points ∼5% -71%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
225 fps ∼13% +226%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (69 - 119, n=18)
107 fps ∼6% +55%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
93 fps ∼5% +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
92 fps ∼5% +33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
69 fps ∼4%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=162)
27.2 fps ∼2% -61%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
22 fps ∼1% -68%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
18 fps ∼1% -74%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (54 - 79, n=19)
60.3 fps ∼13% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
59 fps ∼13% +2%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
59 fps ∼13% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
58 fps ∼13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
57 fps ∼12% -2%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
21 fps ∼5% -64%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=166)
19.8 fps ∼4% -66%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
17 fps ∼4% -71%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
109 fps ∼20% +82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
60 fps ∼11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (43 - 64, n=19)
55.2 fps ∼10% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
48 fps ∼9% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
41 fps ∼7% -32%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 202, n=100)
18 fps ∼3% -70%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.9 fps ∼2% -83%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.5 fps ∼2% -86%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
58 fps ∼16% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (29 - 58, n=19)
42.3 fps ∼12% +18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
36 fps ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
34 fps ∼9% -6%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
27 fps ∼7% -25%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=103)
13.5 fps ∼4% -62%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
9.5 fps ∼3% -74%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
8.3 fps ∼2% -77%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
63 fps ∼12% +54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
41 fps ∼8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (21 - 43, n=19)
37.9 fps ∼7% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
32 fps ∼6% -22%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
28 fps ∼5% -32%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 169, n=50)
18.5 fps ∼3% -55%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6 fps ∼1% -85%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.9 fps ∼1% -88%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
43 fps ∼24% +95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (15 - 59, n=19)
29.1 fps ∼17% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
22 fps ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps ∼11% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps ∼9% -27%
Average of class Tablet (4.3 - 95, n=50)
12.2 fps ∼7% -45%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
5.7 fps ∼3% -74%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
4.7 fps ∼3% -79%
GFXBench
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
25 fps ∼6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (22 - 26, n=19)
24.5 fps ∼6% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
19 fps ∼5% -24%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
16 fps ∼4% -36%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 101, n=29)
11.7 fps ∼3% -53%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3 fps ∼1% -88%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼1% -92%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (11 - 50, n=19)
19.5 fps ∼17% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
13 fps ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
13 fps ∼11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
9.3 fps ∼8% -28%
Average of class Tablet (2 - 47, n=29)
7.29 fps ∼6% -44%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
3.1 fps ∼3% -76%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
2 fps ∼2% -85%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (32.1 - 38.7, n=5)
36.7 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
18.61 fps ∼48%
Average of class Tablet (4.23 - 29.5, n=7)
14.8 fps ∼38%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (733 - 889, n=6)
832 Points ∼30%
Average of class Tablet (426 - 1871, n=11)
823 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
615 Points ∼22%

Legende

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 Apple A10X Fusion, Apple A10X Fusion GPU / PowerVR, Toshiba THGBX669D4LLDXG 64 GB NAND
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 Mediatek MT8173, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 Mediatek MT8176, PowerVR GX6250, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
30333 Points ∼100% +135%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
12897 Points ∼43%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
11854 Points ∼39% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (3086 - 14300, n=20)
11209 Points ∼37% -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
9531 Points ∼31% -26%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
8897 Points ∼29% -31%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
8570 Points ∼28% -34%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 31188, n=152)
5858 Points ∼19% -55%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
257 Points ∼100% +37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
187 Points ∼73%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
178 Points ∼69% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (57 - 204, n=17)
164 Points ∼64% -12%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
137 Points ∼53% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
132 Points ∼51% -29%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 257, n=68)
102 Points ∼40% -45%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
200.59 Points ∼100% +208%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (52.9 - 80.4, n=19)
66.1 Points ∼33% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
65.07 Points ∼32%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
57.007 Points ∼28% -12%
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 202, n=67)
49.7 Points ∼25% -24%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
47.337 Points ∼24% -27%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
46.39 Points ∼23% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
42.73 Points ∼21% -34%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (969 - 43092, n=163)
9429 ms * ∼100% -257%
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2)
3975.5 ms * ∼42% -50%
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50 (Browser: Chrome Version 63)
3756.1 ms * ∼40% -42%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro (Chrome 68.0.3440.91)
3575.4 ms * ∼38% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998) (2425 - 4813, n=19)
3219 ms * ∼34% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
2644.7 ms * ∼28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825 (Samsung Browser 5.2)
2244.4 ms * ∼24% +15%
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017 (Safari Mobile 10)
972.7 ms * ∼10% +63%

* ... kleiner is beter

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 ProAmazon Fire HD 10 2017Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-39%
-34%
-52%
-48%
9%
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
59.08 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
58.56 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-1%
73.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
24%
30.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-49%
56.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
50.5 (17.1 - 71.9, n=23)
-15%
42.5 (14.6 - 73.8, n=41)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.07 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
76.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)
-5%
84.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
55.49 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-31%
80.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
66.9 (18 - 85.3, n=23)
-16%
60.8 (34.4 - 87.7, n=41)
-24%
Random Write 4KB
24.43
13.13
-46%
15.35
-37%
9.37
-62%
8.77
-64%
46.8 (8.77 - 156, n=30)
92%
5.45 (0.13 - 77.9, n=190)
-78%
Random Read 4KB
141.96
45.82
-68%
27.41
-81%
27.72
-80%
13.7
-90%
134 (78.2 - 173, n=30)
-6%
17.4 (1.32 - 142, n=190)
-88%
Sequential Write 256KB
195.76
87.6
-55%
94.08
-52%
147.67
-25%
92.38
-53%
191 (133 - 214, n=30)
-2%
34.5 (2.04 - 208, n=190)
-82%
Sequential Read 256KB
740.54
288.58
-61%
278.59
-62%
262.2
-65%
173.7
-77%
730 (529 - 895, n=30)
-1%
103 (6.75 - 741, n=190)
-86%
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; 1.0.1a: Ø29 (25-31)
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; 0.8.0: Ø39.7 (11-41)
Max. Belasting
 31.4 °C29.9 °C27.7 °C 
 29.4 °C27.8 °C27.9 °C 
 28 °C27.4 °C28.4 °C 
Maximum: 31.4 °C
Gemiddelde: 28.7 °C
27.5 °C30 °C30.2 °C
26.6 °C26.5 °C28.3 °C
26.2 °C26.7 °C26.3 °C
Maximum: 30.2 °C
Gemiddelde: 27.6 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  29.6 °C | Kamertemperatuur 20.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.3 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the bottom side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 20.3 to 56 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
Warmtebeeld van de voorkant (zware belasting)
Warmtebeeld van de voorkant (zware belasting)
Warmtebeeld van de achterkant (zware belasting)
Warmtebeeld van de achterkant (zware belasting)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203029.42530.123.53129.326.64026.924.55032.831.16324.826.78020.726.210019.535.212518.627.216021.445.92002551.425017.459.531516.266.540018.467.550015.467.963013.568.180013.768100013.769.3125014.670.3160014.972.6200014.471.1250014.768.1315014.665.1400014.863.2500014.764.5630014.666.180001561.41000014.952.41250015.147.91600014.938.5SPL27.280.1N0.947.6median 14.9median 65.1Delta1.493237.731.931.131.731.131.132.736.235.926.332.422.232.222.53825.445.518.952.817.159.816.962.41462.613.568.713.869.212.571.312.17511.47511.273.4117010.871.410.574.310.874.610.373.110.375.210.469.410.563.510.459.410.351.310.447.170.765.523.884.62718.20.562.7median 11.2median 69.22.59.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy Tab S4Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 36%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.21 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.76 / 4.22 / 4.25 Watt
Belasting midlight 4.52 / 7.35 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
7500 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Power Consumption
-8%
-41%
-74%
-15%
-64%
Idle Minimum *
1.76
2.08
-18%
1.44
18%
3.3
-88%
1.55
12%
3.21
-82%
Idle Average *
4.22
3.5
17%
6.12
-45%
4.2
-0%
4.17
1%
5.97
-41%
Idle Maximum *
4.25
3.58
16%
6.14
-44%
7
-65%
4.25
-0%
6.19
-46%
Load Average *
4.52
6.97
-54%
8.55
-89%
10.4
-130%
7.13
-58%
9.72
-115%
Load Maximum *
7.35
7.4
-1%
10.62
-44%
13.8
-88%
9.63
-31%
9.97
-36%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
20h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
8h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 15min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 05min
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 SM-T825
6000 mAh
Apple iPad Pro 10.5 2017
8134 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 Pro
7500 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017
6300 mAh
Acer Iconia Tab 10 A3-A50
6100 mAh
Batterijduur
34%
18%
3%
-5%
-30%
Reader / Idle
1227
1903
55%
2036
66%
1254
2%
960
-22%
735
-40%
H.264
735
551
-25%
629
-14%
629
-14%
585
-20%
WiFi v1.3
495
760
54%
693
40%
670
35%
542
9%
387
-22%
Load
245
375
53%
199
-19%
220
-10%
274
12%
175
-29%

Pro

+ slank, stijlvol ontwerp
+ goede prestaties
+ uitbreidbare opslag
+ indrukwekkend OLED-beeldscherm
+ Degelijke quad-speakers
+ S Pen-ondersteuning
+ DeX-integratie
+ optioneel LTE-modem
+ USB 3.1 met ondersteuning voor HDMI en DisplayPort

Contra

- SoC van voorgaand vlaggenschip
- zwakke camera's
- beperkte interne opslag
- geen NFC
- het apparaat voelt niet hoogwaardig
Getest: Samsung Galaxy Tab S4. Testmodel geleverd door Samsung Germany.
Getest: Samsung Galaxy Tab S4. Testmodel geleverd door Samsung Germany.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 is momenteel de sterkste Android-tablet op de markt. Het geweldige Super AMOLED-scherm is bijzonder overtuigend en de DeX-integratie is geweldig voor de productiviteit, hoewel er beperkingen zijn met het gebruik ervan voor gaming en multimedia. De 64 GB aan opslagruimte en 4 GB RAM zijn er ook in overvloed, maar het is een schande dat Samsung de 256 GB niet in meer regio's verkoopt en deze momenteel beperkt is tot alleen de Wi-Fi-versie. De batterijloze S Pen blijft ook een geweldig hulpmiddel.

De Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 is een fantastische tablet die de Android-tablets ten goede komt dankzij het geweldige beeldscherm en het huidige gebrek aan waardige alternatieven.

Samsung heeft echter het doel gemist bij het maken van een high-end tablet met een passend premium gevoel. Het bedrijf heeft de Tab S4 uitgerust met het vlaggenschip SoC van vorig jaar, terwijl de opslagruimte, het RAM-geheugen en de camera's beter passen bij een smartphone uit het middensegment dan een vlaggenschip uit 2018. De kunststof S Pen en het optionele toetsenbord voegen alleen maar toe aan onze indruk toe dat Samsung nog verder kon gaan in het leveren van een tabletervaring op vlaggenschipniveau.

 

De Tab S4 begint bij $649,99 op de Samsung-website, en loopt op tot $749 voor de 256 GB wifi-versie in de Verenigde Staten en tot $729,99 voor de LTE-variant. De meeste Android-tablets zijn echter aanzienlijk goedkoper, waarvan de Huawei MediaPad M5 Pro momenteel het beste alternatief is. De optionele accessoires zijn echter moeilijk te verkrijgen, en heeft ook moeite om de Tab S4 te evenaren.

 

 

Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 - 01-11-2018 v6
Daniel Schmidt

Behuizing
88%
Toetsenbord
67 / 80 → 83%
Aanwijsapparaat
94%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
57 / 65 → 87%
Gewicht
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Batterij
92%
Beeldscherm
88%
Gaming-performance
63 / 68 → 93%
Applicatie-performance
66 / 76 → 87%
Temperatuur
95%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
76 / 91 → 83%
Camera
58 / 85 → 68%
Gemiddelde
79%
90%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Tablet
Daniel Schmidt, 2018-11- 8 (Update: 2018-11- 8)