Notebookcheck

Kort testrapport Lenovo Tab P10 Tablet

Afgekoppeld - De Lenovo Tab P10 is esthetisch meer aantrekkelijk dan de meeste Android-tablets. De glazen achterkant ziet er geweldig uit en wordt ook gebruikt als smart screen wanneer hij is aangesloten op het nieuwe Lenovo Smart Dock dankzij de integratie met Amazon Alexa. Het apparaat wordt echter aangedreven door een eenvoudige Snapdragon 450 SoC en het dock kan alleen worden gekocht als onderdeel van een bundel met de tablet, dus het is niet een grote lofzang. Lees verder om erachter te komen hoe deze middenklasse tablet zich houdt tegen zijn concurrenten.
Inge Schwabe, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger,
Android ARM Smart Home Tablet Touchscreen
Lenovo Tab P10
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
Grafische kaart
Qualcomm Adreno 506
Geheugen
4096 MB 
Beeldscherm
10.1 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitief touchscreen, IPS, glimmend: ja
Opslag
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 53.41 GB beschikbaar
Verbindingen
1 USB 2.0, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Verbindingen: 3.5 mm poort, Card Reader: tot 256 GB microSD kaarten – FAT of FAT32, 1 Vingerafdruklezer, Brightness Sensor, Sensoren: Accelerometer, Hall sensor, USB 2.0 Type-C
Netwerkmogelijkheden
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2, GPS
Afmetingen
hoogte x breedte x diepte (in mm): 7 x 242 x 167
Batterij
27 Wh, 7000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cellen, Batterijduur: 15 h
Besturingssysteem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix , Autofocus
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , Fixed focus
Bijkomende functionaliteiten
Luidsprekers: Vier luidsprekers, Dolby Atmos, Toetsenbord: virtueel toetsenbord, USB lader, USB kabel, snelstartgids, garantieboekje, 24 Maanden Garantie, FM radio. SAR: Body - 1.01 W/kg, fanless
Gewicht
440 g, Voeding: 68 g
Prijs
349 Euro
Links
Lenovo startpagina
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

De glazen achterkant van de Lenovo Tab P10
De glazen achterkant van de Lenovo Tab P10
De voorkant van de Lenovo Tab P10
De voorkant van de Lenovo Tab P10
Vier luidsprekers en de pogo pin connectoren
USB Type-C poort en 3.5 mm audiopoort
De metalen behuizing
Het Lenovo logo geëtst in het glas
De voorkant van de Lenovo Tab P10
De meegeleverde Europese lader en USB Type-A naar Type-C kabel
Standaard homescreen
Standaard homescreen
Vooraf geïnstalleerde apps
Vooraf geïnstalleerde apps
De aanhoudende weernotificatie
De aanhoudende weernotificatie
De vooraf geïnstalleerde FM radio app
De vooraf geïnstalleerde FM radio app
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Chuwi HiPad
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
248 MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
229 MBit/s ∼92% +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
216 (min: 49, max: 250) MBit/s ∼87% +1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
214 MBit/s ∼86% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, SD 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
214 (min: 206, max: 223) MBit/s ∼86%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash
197 (min: 191, max: 201) MBit/s ∼79% -8%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Tab P10
Adreno 506, SD 450, 64 GB eMMC Flash
326 (min: 314, max: 338) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
Adreno 506, SD 450, 32 GB eMMC Flash
312 (min: 291, max: 325) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 64 GB eMMC Flash
248 (min: 114, max: 278) MBit/s ∼76% -24%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
Mali-T830 MP2, Kirin 659, 32 GB eMMC Flash
239 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960s, 32 GB eMMC Flash
237 MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Chuwi HiPad
Mali-T880 MP4, MT6797X, 32 GB eMMC Flash
195 MBit/s ∼60% -40%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340Tooltip
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø214 (206-223)
Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø197 (191-201)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø216 (49-250)
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (314-338)
Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø248 (114-278)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø312 (291-325)
GPS Test: Lenovo Tab P10 - overzicht
GPS Test: Lenovo Tab P10 - overzicht
GPS Test: Lenovo Tab P10 - meer
GPS Test: Lenovo Tab P10 - meer
GPS Test: Lenovo Tab P10 - lus
GPS Test: Lenovo Tab P10 - lus
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - overzicht
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - overzicht
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - meer
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - meer
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - lus
GPS Test: Garmin Edge 500 - lus

Beeldvergelijking

Bekijk een scène en navigeer binnen het eerste beeld. Eén klik wijzigt het zoomniveau. Eén klik op het ingezoomde beeld opent het origineel in een nieuw venster. Het eerste beeld toont de verschaalde foto van het testtoestel.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
klik om beelden te laden
Een foto van onze testkaart
Een foto van onze testkaart
Onze testkaart in detail
ColorChecker Paspoort: de onderste helft van elk vlak representeert de referentiekleur
462
cd/m²		505
cd/m²		527
cd/m²
457
cd/m²		522
cd/m²		528
cd/m²
441
cd/m²		506
cd/m²		506
cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 528 cd/m² Gemiddelde: 494.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5.14 cd/m²
Helderheidsverdeling: 84 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 522 cd/m²
Contrast: 1273:1 (Zwart: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
Lenovo Tab P10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1		Chuwi HiPad
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1		Chuwi Hi9 Plus
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8		Huawei MediaPad T5 10
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
IPS, 2560x1600, 10.8		Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5
Screen
4%
-1%
10%
25%
30%
Brightness middle
522
408.7
-22%
308
-41%
356
-32%
382
-27%
556
7%
Brightness
495
396
-20%
297
-40%
340
-31%
378
-24%
514
4%
Brightness Distribution
84
85
1%
92
10%
92
10%
92
10%
87
4%
Black Level *
0.41
0.51
-24%
0.29
29%
0.5
-22%
0.24
41%
0.42
-2%
Contrast
1273
801
-37%
1062
-17%
712
-44%
1592
25%
1324
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.7
4.13
38%
6.2
7%
2.3
66%
2.8
58%
1.8
73%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.2
7.34
40%
10.5
14%
6.5
47%
6
51%
3.2
74%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.1
4.4
52%
6.6
27%
1.4
85%
3.5
62%
2.2
76%
Gamma
2.14 103%
2.24 98%
2.19 100%
2.16 102%
2.33 94%
2.26 97%
CCT
9417 69%
7389 88%
8216 79%
6565 99%
6903 94%
6819 95%

* ... kleiner is beter

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
Om de schermhelderheid te verlagen schakelen sommige laptops het backlight erg snel aan en uit. Dit gebeurt aan een dergelijk hoge frequentie dat het niet zichtbaar is voor het menselijk oog. Als de frequentie te laag is kunnen personen met gevoelige ogen geïrriteerd geraken, hoofdpijn krijgen en zelfs flickering waarnemen.
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen 34250 Hz ≤ 4 % helderheid instelling

Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 34250 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 4 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden.

De frequentie van 34250 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen.

Ter vergelijking: 50 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 18082 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz waargenomen.

Responstijd Scherm

ℹ
De responstijden van het scherm tonen hoe snel het scherm in staat is om van één kleur naar de andere te veranderen. Trage responstijden kunnen aanleiding geven tot 'nabeelden' rond bewegende objecten of het scherm wazig maken (blur). Vooral spelers van snelle 3D-games hebben baat bij een scherm met snelle responstijden.
   ↔    Responstijd Zwart naar Wit
27.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 9.2 ms stijging
↘ 18 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.7 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
   ↔    Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs
64.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd↗ 28.4 ms stijging
↘ 36 ms daling
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games.
Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.9 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % van alle toestellen zijn beter.
Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (39.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen.
Geekbench 4.4 | PCMark for Android | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench | AnTuTu v6 | AnTuTu v7 | BaseMark OS II
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
11575 Points ∼26% +255%
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=40)
5852 Points ∼13% +79%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
3685 Points ∼8% +13%
Chuwi HiPad
3643 Points ∼8% +12%
Lenovo Tab P10
3261 Points ∼7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=8)
3113 Points ∼7% -5%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3077 Points ∼7% -6%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5809 Points ∼10% +57%
Chuwi HiPad
5064 Points ∼9% +37%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4636 Points ∼8% +25%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=57)
4592 Points ∼8% +24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3846 Points ∼7% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=11)
3838 Points ∼7% +4%
Lenovo Tab P10
3705 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3316 Points ∼6% -10%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Chuwi HiPad
1797 Points ∼28% +141%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1641 Points ∼26% +120%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1634 Points ∼26% +119%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=57)
1627 Points ∼26% +118%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
885 Points ∼14% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=11)
760 Points ∼12% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10
747 Points ∼12%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
745 Points ∼12% 0%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5114 Points ∼39% +20%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
4615 Points ∼35% +9%
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 9615, n=50)
4495 Points ∼34% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=11)
4480 Points ∼34% +5%
Chuwi HiPad
4354 Points ∼33% +2%
Lenovo Tab P10
4250 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4171 Points ∼32% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4077 Points ∼31% -4%
Work performance score
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5798 Points ∼29% +17%
Chuwi HiPad
5463 Points ∼28% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 5656, n=11)
5210 Points ∼26% +5%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
5040 Points ∼26% +2%
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 11644, n=87)
4970 Points ∼25% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
4949 Points ∼25%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4922 Points ∼25% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
4914 Points ∼25% -1%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2323 Points ∼29% +30%
Average of class Tablet (650 - 4756, n=50)
1827 Points ∼23% +2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1804 Points ∼23% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1529 - 1823, n=11)
1769 Points ∼22% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1768 Points ∼22% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1635 Points ∼21% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2069 Points ∼22% +400%
Average of class Tablet (99 - 6993, n=50)
1804 Points ∼19% +336%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
972 Points ∼10% +135%
Lenovo Tab P10
414 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
413 Points ∼4% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (411 - 415, n=11)
413 Points ∼4% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
399 Points ∼4% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2121 Points ∼26% +325%
Average of class Tablet (129 - 5816, n=50)
1608 Points ∼20% +222%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1083 Points ∼13% +117%
Lenovo Tab P10
499 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
498 Points ∼6% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (491 - 501, n=11)
498 Points ∼6% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
480 Points ∼6% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2101 Points ∼37% +17%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1871 Points ∼33% +4%
Lenovo Tab P10
1793 Points ∼31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1580 - 1816, n=11)
1767 Points ∼31% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1766 Points ∼31% -2%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4702, n=58)
1746 Points ∼31% -3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1473 Points ∼26% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=58)
3065 Points ∼11% +331%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2208 Points ∼8% +211%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1133 Points ∼4% +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (709 - 718, n=11)
713 Points ∼2% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
712 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
711 Points ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
611 Points ∼2% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2183 Points ∼16% +166%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=58)
2110 Points ∼16% +157%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1242 Points ∼9% +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (808 - 828, n=11)
822 Points ∼6% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
821 Points ∼6% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
821 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
702 Points ∼5% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2419 Points ∼46% +32%
Lenovo Tab P10
1832 Points ∼35%
Chuwi HiPad
1803 Points ∼35% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1521 - 1855, n=11)
1788 Points ∼34% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1775 Points ∼34% -3%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1746 Points ∼34% -5%
Average of class Tablet (729 - 4096, n=66)
1746 Points ∼34% -5%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1654 Points ∼32% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1504 Points ∼18% +313%
Average of class Tablet (55 - 6128, n=66)
1419 Points ∼17% +290%
Chuwi HiPad
632 Points ∼7% +74%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
626 Points ∼7% +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (363 - 369, n=11)
365 Points ∼4% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
364 Points ∼4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
363 Points ∼4% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
140 Points ∼2% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1642 Points ∼8% +271%
Average of class Tablet (70 - 5346, n=68)
1330 Points ∼7% +200%
Chuwi HiPad
739 Points ∼4% +67%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
726 Points ∼4% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (441 - 449, n=11)
444 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
443 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
441 Points ∼2% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
176 Points ∼1% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2445 Points ∼48% +35%
Lenovo Tab P10
1814 Points ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
1802 Points ∼36% -1%
Chuwi HiPad
1785 Points ∼35% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1504 - 1833, n=11)
1781 Points ∼35% -2%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1714 Points ∼34% -6%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 4056, n=71)
1636 Points ∼32% -10%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1586 Points ∼31% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=71)
1959 Points ∼16% +184%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1719 Points ∼14% +149%
Chuwi HiPad
921 Points ∼7% +33%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
890 Points ∼7% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (690 - 716, n=11)
700 Points ∼6% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
696 Points ∼6% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
691 Points ∼6%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
100 Points ∼1% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1840 Points ∼19% +130%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=72)
1622 Points ∼17% +102%
Chuwi HiPad
1032 Points ∼11% +29%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
996 Points ∼10% +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (800 - 824, n=11)
809 Points ∼9% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
806 Points ∼8% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
801 Points ∼8%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
126 Points ∼1% -84%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
14698 Points ∼17% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
14147 Points ∼16% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
14108 Points ∼16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (13596 - 15177, n=10)
14046 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=166)
13922 Points ∼16% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
12893 Points ∼15% -9%
Chuwi HiPad
12462 Points ∼14% -12%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
11203 Points ∼13% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
35210 Points ∼6% +184%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 221941, n=166)
23419 Points ∼4% +89%
Chuwi HiPad
16016 Points ∼3% +29%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
15682 Points ∼3% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12281 - 12550, n=10)
12423 Points ∼2% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
12400 Points ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12323 Points ∼2% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
10466 Points ∼2% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26875 Points ∼11% +111%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 110846, n=167)
17645 Points ∼7% +38%
Chuwi HiPad
15061 Points ∼6% +18%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
14402 Points ∼6% +13%
Lenovo Tab P10
12743 Points ∼5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (12562 - 12878, n=10)
12732 Points ∼5% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
12686 Points ∼5% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
10923 Points ∼4% -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
96 fps ∼1% +357%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
39 fps ∼0% +86%
Chuwi HiPad
39 fps ∼0% +86%
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=187)
33.8 fps ∼0% +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 22, n=10)
21.6 fps ∼0% +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
21 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
21 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
19 fps ∼0% -10%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
40 fps ∼1% +100%
Chuwi HiPad
34 fps ∼1% +70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=10)
26.7 fps ∼1% +34%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
25 fps ∼1% +25%
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=191)
22.2 fps ∼1% +11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
20 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
20 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
19 fps ∼1% -5%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
44 fps ∼7% +378%
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=121)
23 fps ∼4% +150%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
19 fps ∼3% +107%
Chuwi HiPad
19 fps ∼3% +107%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=10)
9.28 fps ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
9.2 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
9.2 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
8.5 fps ∼1% -8%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
26 fps ∼7% +199%
Chuwi HiPad
19 fps ∼5% +118%
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=127)
15.8 fps ∼4% +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=10)
13.1 fps ∼4% +51%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
11 fps ∼3% +26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
8.8 fps ∼2% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
8.7 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
8.5 fps ∼2% -2%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=73)
20.8 fps ∼0% +247%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼0% +200%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
13 fps ∼0% +117%
Chuwi HiPad
13 fps ∼0% +117%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
6.1 fps ∼0% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.1, n=10)
6.06 fps ∼0% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
6 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5.1 fps ∼0% -15%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
15 fps ∼0% +163%
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=73)
13.4 fps ∼0% +135%
Chuwi HiPad
12 fps ∼0% +111%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=10)
9.17 fps ∼0% +61%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
6.2 fps ∼0% +9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
5.7 fps ∼0% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
5.7 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5 fps ∼0% -12%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 49, n=22)
10.1 fps ∼6% +432%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.9 - 3.7, n=3)
3.07 fps ∼2% +62%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
2.4 fps ∼2% +26%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.9 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1.7 fps ∼1% -11%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (0.8 - 51.1, n=22)
10.3 fps ∼4% +836%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
2.5 fps ∼1% +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (1.1 - 1.2, n=3)
1.133 fps ∼0% +3%
Lenovo Tab P10
1.1 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1 fps ∼0% -9%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 58, n=22)
14.8 fps ∼7% +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.2 - 6.1, n=3)
5.1 fps ∼2% +59%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
3.8 fps ∼2% +19%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.2 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
2.7 fps ∼1% -16%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 134, n=22)
27.6 fps ∼5% +712%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7.2 fps ∼1% +112%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.4 - 3.4, n=3)
3.4 fps ∼1% 0%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
2.8 fps ∼0% -18%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
18 fps ∼4% +429%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 107, n=49)
14.7 fps ∼3% +332%
Chuwi HiPad
7.3 fps ∼2% +115%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7.2 fps ∼2% +112%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 3.5, n=10)
3.42 fps ∼1% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.4 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.4 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3.1 fps ∼1% -9%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
10 fps ∼4% +203%
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 47, n=49)
8.98 fps ∼3% +172%
Chuwi HiPad
7.4 fps ∼3% +124%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3.3 - 7, n=10)
5.05 fps ∼2% +53%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
4 fps ∼2% +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
3.3 fps ∼1% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10
3.3 fps ∼1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
2.9 fps ∼1% -12%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
147305 Points ∼50% +146%
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=67)
69584 Points ∼24% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
67359 Points ∼23% +12%
Lenovo Tab P10
59916 Points ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10)
57703 Points ∼20% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
55314 Points ∼19% -8%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32)
160864 Points ∼28% +124%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
113687 Points ∼20% +58%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
110854 Points ∼20% +55%
Chuwi HiPad
107201 Points ∼19% +49%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
87335 Points ∼15% +22%
Lenovo Tab P10
71739 Points ∼13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
70431 Points ∼12% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11)
69869 Points ∼12% -3%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
818 Points ∼40% +11%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
811 Points ∼40% +10%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
789 Points ∼39% +7%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=117)
760 Points ∼37% +4%
Lenovo Tab P10
734 Points ∼36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (10 - 835, n=11)
618 Points ∼30% -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
10 Points ∼0% -99%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=118)
2304 Points ∼8% +142%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1967 Points ∼7% +107%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1602 Points ∼6% +68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (943 - 975, n=11)
960 Points ∼3% +1%
Lenovo Tab P10
951 Points ∼3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
943 Points ∼3% -1%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
844 Points ∼3% -11%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2654 Points ∼32% +211%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1960 Points ∼23% +130%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 6751, n=118)
1188 Points ∼14% +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (770 - 1522, n=11)
1001 Points ∼12% +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
969 Points ∼12% +14%
Lenovo Tab P10
853 Points ∼10%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
849 Points ∼10% 0%
System
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
3318 Points ∼20% +16%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
3133 Points ∼19% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10
2861 Points ∼17%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
2838 Points ∼17% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2560 - 2898, n=11)
2759 Points ∼17% -4%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=118)
2590 Points ∼16% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
2561 Points ∼16% -10%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
1769 Points ∼21% +55%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus
1446 Points ∼17% +27%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10
1435 Points ∼17% +26%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=117)
1345 Points ∼16% +18%
Lenovo Tab P10
1142 Points ∼14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (389 - 1337, n=11)
1035 Points ∼12% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
389 Points ∼5% -66%

Legende

 
Lenovo Tab P10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Chuwi HiPad MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Chuwi Hi9 Plus MediaTek Helio X27 MT6797X, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 HiSilicon Kirin 659, ARM Mali-T830 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 HiSilicon Kirin 960s, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
 
Average of class Tablet
JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 279, n=97)
58.1 Points ∼100% +161%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
36.127 Points ∼62% +62%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
30.911 Points ∼53% +39%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Google Chrome 70)
29.934 Points ∼52% +34%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
29.467 Points ∼51% +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=10)
22.3 Points ∼38% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
22.275 Points ∼38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
22.084 Points ∼38% -1%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=183)
7432 Points ∼100% +82%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
6802 Points ∼92% +67%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
6046 Points ∼81% +48%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70)
6017 Points ∼81% +48%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
5471 Points ∼74% +34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
4078 Points ∼55% 0%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
4075 Points ∼55%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=11)
3971 Points ∼53% -3%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
11529.2 ms * ∼100% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=11)
11469 ms * ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
11352 ms * ∼98%
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99)
9850.9 ms * ∼85% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
9293.1 ms * ∼81% +18%
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=194)
9001 ms * ∼78% +21%
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70)
7059 ms * ∼61% +38%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
5947 ms * ∼52% +48%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65)
116 Points ∼100% +13%
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=78)
116 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67)
113 Points ∼97% +10%
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71)
103 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100)
99 Points ∼85% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7)
97 Points ∼84% -6%

* ... kleiner is beter

Lenovo Tab P10Chuwi HiPadChuwi Hi9 PlusHuawei MediaPad T5 10Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590NAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-31%
-44%
66%
44%
-6%
8%
-46%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.81
10%
20.44
-66%
72.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
19%
73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
21%
60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
57.6 (11.2 - 74.7, n=120)
-5%
48.1 (14 - 73.8, n=63)
-21%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
65.93
-22%
21.16
-75%
83.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-4%
76.6 (21.1 - 87.2, n=120)
-9%
65.9 (17.6 - 87.7, n=63)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
15.75
10.28
-35%
13.01
-17%
76.12
383%
60.8
286%
13.39
-15%
27.1 (3.4 - 133, n=137)
72%
9.15 (0.13 - 262, n=214)
-42%
Random Read 4KB
53.9
40.21
-25%
42.2
-22%
76.67
42%
54.7
1%
71.13
32%
56.1 (11.4 - 149, n=137)
4%
22.5 (1.04 - 225, n=214)
-58%
Sequential Write 256KB
205.74
73.55
-64%
132.47
-36%
83.84
-59%
126.8
-38%
103.32
-50%
174 (40 - 254, n=137)
-15%
47.7 (2.04 - 522, n=214)
-77%
Sequential Read 256KB
276.7
144.33
-48%
144.97
-48%
312.17
13%
247.8
-10%
285.63
3%
274 (95.6 - 704, n=137)
-1%
131 (6.75 - 1789, n=214)
-53%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; Smooth; 0.10.0: Ø25.8 (19-32)
; Balanced; 0.10.0: Ø25.1 (16-27)
Arena of Valor
010203040Tooltip
; min; 1.26.1.2: Ø29.1 (12-32)
; high HD; 1.26.1.2: Ø28.7 (1-31)
Max. Belasting
 35.1 °C33 °C31.1 °C 
 35.1 °C30.5 °C29.3 °C 
 32.8 °C30.7 °C28.2 °C 
Maximum: 35.1 °C
Gemiddelde: 31.8 °C
28.2 °C30.7 °C32.8 °C
27.5 °C28.5 °C30.8 °C
27.5 °C28.4 °C28.8 °C
Maximum: 32.8 °C
Gemiddelde: 29.2 °C
Stroomadapter (max.)  31.2 °C | Kamertemperatuur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.6 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.7 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.6 °C / 87 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.135.22529.227.3312623.94023.224.85031.931.86327.421.9802927.210024.230.312518.438.81601850.220017.449.325014.455.831515.858.740016.360.750015.463.363014.770.780016.275.4100014.778125013.873.916001472.2200014.474.2250014.171.6315014.672.6400014.675.8500014.480.3630014.480.4800014.873.41000015.271.91250014.7691600014.850.5SPL26.987.6N0.972.6median 14.7median 71.6Delta1.49.23231.727.622.525.324.626.920.736.430.325.926.521.52727.120.824.522.315.742.21746.817.556.118.461.216.26314.669.815.272.514.772.714.572.914.271.713.971.713.868.614.466.513.963.114.260.614.561.714.86414.664.314.959.91557.11551.526.880.70.947.9median 14.8median 631.57.528.630.224.926.624.624.426.422.530.824.623.619.820.221.119.928.817.642.919.159.719.159.617.456.616.961.616.863.515.166.316.567.815.666.41561.915.565.115.367.615.771.515.569.715.572.815.467.915.8641663.815.860.816.154.716.151.617.349.727.979.9146.4median 16median 63.50.65.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab P10Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590NHuawei MediaPad M5 10.8
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Stroomgebruik
Uit / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.31 Watt
Inactiefdarkmidlight 1.01 / 4.16 / 4.17 Watt
Belasting midlight 5.45 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh		Chuwi HiPad
7000 mAh		Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7000 mAh		Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5100 mAh		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Power Consumption
-68%
-63%
-104%
-57%
-5%
Idle Minimum *
1.01
2.7
-167%
2.18
-116%
2.33
-131%
2.01
-99%
1.26
-25%
Idle Average *
4.16
5.5
-32%
5.29
-27%
8.46
-103%
5.4
-30%
4.22
-1%
Idle Maximum *
4.17
5.6
-34%
5.37
-29%
8.49
-104%
5.44
-30%
4.29
-3%
Load Average *
5.45
7
-28%
8.56
-57%
11.14
-104%
8.55
-57%
5.48
-1%
Load Maximum *
6.9
12.2
-77%
12.86
-86%
12.3
-78%
11.53
-67%
6.57
5%

* ... kleiner is beter

Batterijduur
Inactief (zonder WLAN, minimale helderheid)
21h 55min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
16h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 10min
Belast (maximale helderheid)
4h 49min
Lenovo Tab P10
7000 mAh		Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE
5070 mAh		Chuwi HiPad
7000 mAh		Chuwi Hi9 Plus
7000 mAh		Huawei MediaPad T5 10
5100 mAh		Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8
7500 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N
7300 mAh
Batterijduur
-40%
-38%
-37%
13%
-22%
21%
Reader / Idle
1315
1241
-6%
3329
153%
1344
2%
1960
49%
H.264
910
580
-36%
702
-23%
963
6%
WiFi v1.3
992
593
-40%
616
-38%
634
-36%
525
-47%
648
-35%
938
-5%
Load
289
93
-68%
241
-17%
196
-32%
385
33%

Pro

+ stijlvol ontwerp
+ glazen achterkant
+ licht
+ vier luidsprekers
+ camera met LED-flitser
+ 4 GB RAM
+ grote interne opslag
+ Amazon Alexa smart screen-functionaliteit met de Lenovo Smart Dock
+ vingerafdrukscanner
+ USB Type-C
+ koptelefoon aansluiting
+ geschikt voor families en kinderen

Contra

- tegenvallende prestaties
- luidsprekers passen niet aan wanneer het apparaat in liggende of staande modus wordt vastgehouden
- slechte gamingprestaties
- bloatware
- optionele LTE
- geen exFAT-ondersteuning
- verouderde beveiligingssoftware
Getest: de Lenovo Tab P10 tablet.
Getest: de Lenovo Tab P10 tablet.

Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.

De Lenovo Tab P10 is een degelijke tablet die een algehele score heeft die vergelijkbaar is met de Hi9Plus en de MediaPad T5 10 en net niet met de Galaxy Tab A. We raden de Tab P10 echter niet aan als een gaming-tablet. Het apparaat is niet krachtig genoeg voor games die veel rekenkracht vereisen. De tablet is geschikt voor eenvoudige spellen en algemene taken zoals surfen op het web, e-mails en het bekijken van video's.

De Lenovo Tab P10 is een lichtgewicht en stijlvolle tablet die goed is uitgerust, maar er zijn krachtigere, vergelijkbaar geprijsde alternatieven op de markt.

De Tab P10 ziet er duur uit dankzij zijn glazen achterkant en zijn afgeschuinde metalen frame, terwijl hij ook meer RAM en interne opslagruimte heeft dan onze vergelijkingsapparatuur.

We raden echter aan om te wachten totdat Lenovo zijn Smart Dock-bundel heeft vrijgegeven, omdat het bedrijf naar verluidt het pakket voor dezelfde prijs zal verkopen als momenteel wordt gevraagd voor de tablet alleen. Lenovo zal eerst de bundel voor de Tab M10 op de markt moeten brengen, voordat deze Tab P10-bundel verkrijgbaar wordt. Het bedrijf zal naar verluidt de bundel aanvankelijk verkopen met de 3 GB RAM en 32 GB opslagversie, dus het kan een verstandige zet zijn om de versie met hogere opslagcapaciteit te kopen als je geen Amazon Alexa-functionaliteit wilt.

 

 

Lenovo Tab P10 - 21-01-2019 v6(old)
Inge Schwabe

Behuizing
80%
Toetsenbord
69 / 80 → 87%
Aanwijsapparaat
80%
Aansluitmogelijkheden
45 / 65 → 68%
Gewicht
84 / 40-88 → 92%
Batterij
98%
Beeldscherm
82%
Gaming-performance
26 / 68 → 39%
Applicatie-performance
47 / 76 → 62%
Temperatuur
92%
Luidheid
100%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Gemiddelde
71%
83%
Tablet - Gewogen Gemiddelde
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Overzichten en testrapporten over laptops en mobieltjes > Testrapporten > Kort testrapport Lenovo Tab P10 Tablet
Inge Schwabe, 2019-01-23 (Update: 2019-01-23)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj