Kort testrapport Lenovo Tab P10 Tablet
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , Fixed focus
Top 10 Testrapporten
» Top 10 Multimedia Notebooks
» Top 10 Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Gaming Laptops
» Top 10 Lichtgewicht Gaming-Notebooks
» Top 10 Premium Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Budget Office/Business-Notebooks
» Top 10 Workstation-Laptops
» Top 10 Subnotebooks
» Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €300
» Top 10 Notebooks tot €500
» Top 10 Notebooks tot € 1.000De beste notebookbeeldschermen zoals getest door Notebookcheck
» De beste notebookbeeldschermen
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 13
» Top Windows Alternatieven voor de MacBook Pro 15
» Top Windows alternatieven voor de MacBook 12 en Air
» Top 10 best verkopende notebooks op Amazon
» Top 10 Convertible Notebooks
» Top 10 Tablets
» Top 10 Tablets tot € 250
» Top 10 Smartphones
» Top 10 Phablets (>90cm²)
» Top 10 Camera Smartphones
» Top 10 Smartphones tot €500
» Top 10 best verkopende smartphones op Amazon
Size Comparison
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad |
|
Helderheidsverdeling: 84 %
Helderheid in Batterij-modus: 522 cd/m²
Contrast: 1273:1 (Zwart: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 9.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14
Lenovo Tab P10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Chuwi HiPad IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Chuwi Hi9 Plus IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 IPS, 2560x1600, 10.80 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 4% | -1% | 10% | 25% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 522 | 408.7 -22% | 308 -41% | 356 -32% | 382 -27% | 556 7% |
Brightness | 495 | 396 -20% | 297 -40% | 340 -31% | 378 -24% | 514 4% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 92 10% | 92 10% | 92 10% | 87 4% |
Black Level * | 0.41 | 0.51 -24% | 0.29 29% | 0.5 -22% | 0.24 41% | 0.42 -2% |
Contrast | 1273 | 801 -37% | 1062 -17% | 712 -44% | 1592 25% | 1324 4% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 * | 6.7 | 4.13 38% | 6.2 7% | 2.3 66% | 2.8 58% | 1.8 73% |
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. * | 12.2 | 7.34 40% | 10.5 14% | 6.5 47% | 6 51% | 3.2 74% |
Greyscale DeltaE2000 * | 9.1 | 4.4 52% | 6.6 27% | 1.4 85% | 3.5 62% | 2.2 76% |
Gamma | 2.14 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.19 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 9417 69% | 7389 88% | 8216 79% | 6565 99% | 6903 94% | 6819 95% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM waargenomen | 34250 Hz | ≤ 4 % helderheid instelling | |
Het backlight van het scherm flikkert aan 34250 Hz (hoogstwaarschijnlijk met PWM - Pulse-Width Modulation) aan een helderheid van 4 % en lager. Boven deze helderheid zou er geen flickering / PWM mogen optreden. De frequentie van 34250 Hz is redelijk hoog en de meeste mensen die gevoelig zijn aan flickering zouden dit dus niet mogen waarnemen of geïrriteerde ogen krijgen. Ter vergelijking: 51 % van alle geteste toestellen maakten geen gebruik van PWM om de schermhelderheid te verlagen. Als het wel werd gebruikt, werd een gemiddelde van 9686 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz waargenomen. |
Responstijd Scherm
↔ Responstijd Zwart naar Wit | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 9.2 ms stijging | |
↘ 18 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde relatief trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (24.3 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. | ||
↔ Responstijd 50% Grijs naar 80% Grijs | ||
64.4 ms ... stijging ↗ en daling ↘ gecombineerd | ↗ 28.4 ms stijging | |
↘ 36 ms daling | ||
Het scherm vertoonde trage responstijden in onze tests en is misschien te traag voor games. Ter vergelijking: alle testtoestellen variëren van 0.8 (minimum) tot 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % van alle toestellen zijn beter. Dit betekent dat de gemeten responstijd slechter is dan het gemiddelde (38.5 ms) van alle geteste toestellen. |
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 | |
Compute RenderScript Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (840 - 43802, n=46) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (2777 - 3374, n=10) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=63) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3272 - 4022, n=13) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=63) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (741 - 787, n=13) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N |
PCMark for Android | |
Work 2.0 performance score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (4267 - 12603, n=64) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4171 - 4759, n=13) | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Work performance score | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (1873 - 14982, n=99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (4836 - 6062, n=13) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (1 - 451, n=201) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (21 - 23, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (20 - 34, n=12) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Average of class Tablet (1.1 - 120, n=205) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (1.6 - 220, n=135) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (9.2 - 9.4, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 110, n=140) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (8.7 - 18, n=12) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (1.7 - 173, n=87) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (6 - 6.9, n=12) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Average of class Tablet (2.7 - 95, n=87) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.7 - 13, n=12) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Average of class Tablet (14200 - 227987, n=67) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (54731 - 60077, n=10) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (20856 - 566378, n=32) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus | |
Chuwi HiPad | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | |
Lenovo Tab P10 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (10.9 - 376, n=112) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Google Chrome 70) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=12) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 58568, n=197) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=13) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=13) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
Chuwi HiPad (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
Average of class Tablet (464 - 43092, n=209) | |
Chuwi Hi9 Plus (Chrome 70) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 (Chrome 65) | |
Average of class Tablet (36 - 386, n=78) | |
Huawei MediaPad T5 10 (Chrome 67) | |
Lenovo Tab P10 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7) |
* ... kleiner is beter
Lenovo Tab P10 | Chuwi HiPad | Chuwi Hi9 Plus | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -31% | -44% | 66% | 44% | -6% | 10% | -38% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.95 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 66.81 10% | 20.44 -66% | 72.53 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 19% | 73.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 21% | 60.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -1% | 58.4 (11.2 - 74.7, n=140) -4% | 50.7 (14 - 73.8, n=75) -17% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 84.28 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | 65.93 -22% | 21.16 -75% | 83.94 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0% | 85.14 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1% | 80.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -4% | 77.3 (21.1 - 87.2, n=140) -8% | 68.7 (17.6 - 87.7, n=75) -18% |
Random Write 4KB | 15.75 | 10.28 -35% | 13.01 -17% | 76.12 383% | 60.8 286% | 13.39 -15% | 28.7 (3.4 - 147, n=159) 82% | 11.9 (0.13 - 262, n=228) -24% |
Random Read 4KB | 53.9 | 40.21 -25% | 42.2 -22% | 76.67 42% | 54.7 1% | 71.13 32% | 57.3 (11.4 - 149, n=159) 6% | 26.2 (1.04 - 230, n=228) -51% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 205.74 | 73.55 -64% | 132.47 -36% | 83.84 -59% | 126.8 -38% | 103.32 -50% | 177 (40 - 254, n=159) -14% | 57.9 (2.04 - 732, n=228) -72% |
Sequential Read 256KB | 276.7 | 144.33 -48% | 144.97 -48% | 312.17 13% | 247.8 -10% | 285.63 3% | 274 (95.6 - 704, n=159) -1% | 152 (6.75 - 1789, n=228) -45% |
PUBG Mobile
Arena of Valor
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.5 °C / 94 F, ranging from 22.2 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.5 °C / 87 F.
Lenovo Tab P10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%
Uit / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Inactief | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Belasting |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh | Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh | Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -68% | -63% | -104% | -57% | -5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.01 | 2.7 -167% | 2.18 -116% | 2.33 -131% | 2.01 -99% | 1.26 -25% |
Idle Average * | 4.16 | 5.5 -32% | 5.29 -27% | 8.46 -103% | 5.4 -30% | 4.22 -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.17 | 5.6 -34% | 5.37 -29% | 8.49 -104% | 5.44 -30% | 4.29 -3% |
Load Average * | 5.45 | 7 -28% | 8.56 -57% | 11.14 -104% | 8.55 -57% | 5.48 -1% |
Load Maximum * | 6.9 | 12.2 -77% | 12.86 -86% | 12.3 -78% | 11.53 -67% | 6.57 5% |
* ... kleiner is beter
Lenovo Tab P10 7000 mAh | Lenovo Tablet 10-20L3000KGE 5070 mAh | Chuwi HiPad 7000 mAh | Chuwi Hi9 Plus 7000 mAh | Huawei MediaPad T5 10 5100 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 10.8 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Batterijduur | -40% | -38% | -37% | 13% | -22% | 21% | |
Reader / Idle | 1315 | 1241 -6% | 3329 153% | 1344 2% | 1960 49% | ||
H.264 | 910 | 580 -36% | 702 -23% | 963 6% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 992 | 593 -40% | 616 -38% | 634 -36% | 525 -47% | 648 -35% | 938 -5% |
Load | 289 | 93 -68% | 241 -17% | 196 -32% | 385 33% |
Pro
Contra
Voor het volledige, Engelse testrapport, klik hier.
De Lenovo Tab P10 is een degelijke tablet die een algehele score heeft die vergelijkbaar is met de Hi9Plus en de MediaPad T5 10 en net niet met de Galaxy Tab A. We raden de Tab P10 echter niet aan als een gaming-tablet. Het apparaat is niet krachtig genoeg voor games die veel rekenkracht vereisen. De tablet is geschikt voor eenvoudige spellen en algemene taken zoals surfen op het web, e-mails en het bekijken van video's.
De Lenovo Tab P10 is een lichtgewicht en stijlvolle tablet die goed is uitgerust, maar er zijn krachtigere, vergelijkbaar geprijsde alternatieven op de markt.
De Tab P10 ziet er duur uit dankzij zijn glazen achterkant en zijn afgeschuinde metalen frame, terwijl hij ook meer RAM en interne opslagruimte heeft dan onze vergelijkingsapparatuur.
We raden echter aan om te wachten totdat Lenovo zijn Smart Dock-bundel heeft vrijgegeven, omdat het bedrijf naar verluidt het pakket voor dezelfde prijs zal verkopen als momenteel wordt gevraagd voor de tablet alleen. Lenovo zal eerst de bundel voor de Tab M10 op de markt moeten brengen, voordat deze Tab P10-bundel verkrijgbaar wordt. Het bedrijf zal naar verluidt de bundel aanvankelijk verkopen met de 3 GB RAM en 32 GB opslagversie, dus het kan een verstandige zet zijn om de versie met hogere opslagcapaciteit te kopen als je geen Amazon Alexa-functionaliteit wilt.
Lenovo Tab P10 - 21-01-2019 v6(old)
Inge Schwabe